19:55 Good info. Getting ready to attend CJ4 initial. This will be my first type rating.
@Big.Ron14 жыл бұрын
Excellent information. Everything you said reminds me of when I did IA school 20 years ago. Granted no flying but the ground, oral and written were all there. The ground and oral were school and the written was FAA. Intense but i learned alot. Thank you.
@AirplaneAcademy4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing and for the comment!
@chazflyz5 жыл бұрын
Nice video. I got typed in the K350 earlier this year and just went through recurrent.
@AirplaneAcademy5 жыл бұрын
Awesome! Jealous! -charlie
@jimcaufman2328 Жыл бұрын
The most difficult type rating is your first. The second time around is much easier because you know what to expect. Early simulators were not very good but since the 1980s the simulators are exactly like the aircraft. In fact After shooting an approach and landing to a 300 foot RVR you often feel like you were in the simulator. The key is working together and remember there is no such thing as a one man band.
@CanuckFlyer3 жыл бұрын
350 is the best all-around aircraft I've ever flown. Beechcraft got it right with this one!
@alessio2724 жыл бұрын
King airs are notorious for power lever migration.
@williamschlecht35483 жыл бұрын
Sounds like every other professional commercial level flying course. Great comments and good philosophy.
@AirplaneAcademy3 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much!
@deanshowalter17892 жыл бұрын
Excellent overview... thanks!
@williammickelson4033 жыл бұрын
Lots of good information
@mxcollin953 жыл бұрын
Great video and thanks for taking the time to make it! I just found your channel and am definitely subscribing! I’m headed to flight safety in Wichita shortly for the same type rating. It was kind of comforting to watch this since I haven’t been through a flight safety course since going through the Hawker 800XP course in ‘04. So ya...I’ll definitely be knocking off some rust. I’m sure you probably had at least the operating limitations memorized before you got there but was there anything else that you wish you would’ve or should’ve focused on more before getting to school (besides the electrical system you mentioned)?
@scottmajor26205 жыл бұрын
Great video, but i was constantly distracted by how clean the glass is in your plane. Mine never looks that good. :)
@AirplaneAcademy5 жыл бұрын
Ha! Nice little bird in the shot. Wish it was ours!
@AshishBalajiR Жыл бұрын
Do Companies and airlines pay for the type rating training and provide the certificates once hired or do you need to pay for and obtain the type rating yourself before applying to these companies/airlines?
@Hedgeflexlfz Жыл бұрын
They pay for it
@calvinnickel99954 жыл бұрын
Your thumbnail photo is my company’s old airplane at my home airport. I fly its replacement in an identical paint scheme.
@alexhackler81664 жыл бұрын
Calvin Nickel is that CYXS?! I can’t quite tell
@dutchboyish2 жыл бұрын
how many hours in airplanes are required?
@conquest75634 жыл бұрын
How about when you're job is on the line?
@thefireman28544 жыл бұрын
Try to learn and be familiar with as much as possible BEFORE going to the type rating course. Some people show up without looking into anything. It will make it much more stressful.
@KingOfBanks3 жыл бұрын
Does the B300 type rating not cover the B1900 under the FAA rules?
@TrainSounds3 жыл бұрын
I’m at a part 61 flight school, so is there a way I can do it at a part 61?
@xstankovic44554 жыл бұрын
How much year to be captain in king air . After getting the three license
@Naija4K2 жыл бұрын
Type rating should come with avionics used in training. Because they different avionics are so different that it’s not clear these pilots can fly older avionics systems.
@gracebyseven2 жыл бұрын
Hi there. I'll soon be transitioning from many years in the B-737 to a Citation and wondering what training will be like. Are systems very complex? What about maneuvers? Thanks in advance.
@AirplaneAcademy2 жыл бұрын
Congrats! Here's a video talking about the citation type rating: kzbin.info/www/bejne/q4SzepuGg6mZaKc
@shawnclark7325 жыл бұрын
Thanks. I always wondered if the 350 required a type rating. I knew the 90 didn’t.
@benignomanuelvaldes94004 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir!
@AirplaneAcademy4 жыл бұрын
You're welcome! :)
@donizetesilva1088 Жыл бұрын
Donizete Braganca pt SP Brasil ✈✈✈✈✈✈
@DanielHelc5 жыл бұрын
Its all fun and games until you run into a psycho instructor and then is not. It makes the session total hell.
@AirplaneAcademy5 жыл бұрын
Yikes - I'll bet!
@nocalsteve5 жыл бұрын
Turboprops do not require a type-rating unless they weigh more than 12,500 lbs. Turboprops are not turbojets.
@AirplaneAcademy5 жыл бұрын
Correct - the King Air 350 exceeds the 12,500 lb mark which is why it needs a type rating. The smaller ones do not for the reasons you pointed out.
@sam040194914 жыл бұрын
Sort you volume out mate.
@StefBelgium4 жыл бұрын
Volume is fine....sort your crappy speakers dude 😂😂😂🤣😅