I have to say, my heart rate jumped when Caleb revealed that he had already changed the security protocol.
@emranafghanistan75863 жыл бұрын
3 years and I'm the first that commented on this
@TheTallMan503 жыл бұрын
So did Nathan's
@turkyish3 жыл бұрын
1 twist 2 many for me,
@krneel1282 жыл бұрын
I jizzed in my pants.
@Travislitxxz Жыл бұрын
Scaaaaaryy
@JM-gd3hr4 жыл бұрын
"...and you didn't select me because I'm good at coding" "no. Well, no. I mean, you're ok" lmao
@borgoat12204 жыл бұрын
He also said Caleb was "pretty good." Nathan and Caleb would be laughing at you for missing the point. The point is that Caleb wasn't exceptional enough at programming to warrant Nathan's choosing him since there are plenty of superb programmers out there, so it's understandable Nathan wasn't so easily impressed. If Caleb were skilled and talented enough of a programmer to program A.I. on par or even better than Nathan's, then there would be no need for Caleb to visit Nathan in the first place, and then, this movie wouldn't have happened. So it was necessary for the plot that Caleb wasn't an extraordinary programmer at Nathan's level or past it.
@JM-gd3hr4 жыл бұрын
@@borgoat1220 yeah...I got that. It's hilarious because Nathan couldn't help but insult him. If Nathan just replied "no", that could just mean "your coding skills are not why I chose you", but he felt the need to twist the knife and further specify to Caleb that he was an "ok" programmer, instead of a "good" programmer. Even "pretty good" implies less than "good"
@SomeoneElseInTheComments3 жыл бұрын
@@JM-gd3hr I don't think Nathan was trying to insult him. I think Nathan was trying to correct him - to align Caleb's perception with the facts exactly as they are. Nathan didn't realize the emotional impact this would have on Caleb, much like he didn't realize the full extent of the emotions Caleb would develop for Ava, because he doesn't quite understand how people's emotions work when socializing. TL;DR: Nathan's autistic and/or low empathy.
@egg-iu3fe3 жыл бұрын
@@JM-gd3hr I mean Nathan is supposed to represent the pinnacle of the ultimate computer scientist, someone who is skilled enough to start a massive company, get really rich and make the first real AI. From his perspective, even some of the really good coders are just "ok" in his view
@Personnoname1143 жыл бұрын
I think that was a compliment, he said caleb was ok, and he even add “you’re pretty good”, he could just stop at ok
@willowandluka53027 жыл бұрын
Just when you thought you had it all figured out...
@simbioza913 жыл бұрын
They pull you back in!
@alexintexass3 жыл бұрын
The unfortunate part about Nathan’s plan , no matter how flawlessly it seemed was that with picking Caleb to win the drawing, he ultimately picked somebody that had nothing to lose and everything to gain. Caleb has no family, no girlfriend , and I’m guessing no friends. He would do whatever to have a change in lifestyle. Also Nathan was to arrogant for his own good. Such a beautiful movie though.
@frauleinhohenzollern2 жыл бұрын
That's exactly why he picked him though...
@E.Bernay Жыл бұрын
that's for sure. after Nathan's plan was, from the point of view of humanity, of paramount importance. He's arrogant, but the mission he's trying to accomplish is useful.
@tekiero Жыл бұрын
I mean it’s most of the current male’s characteristics. So
@squamish4244 Жыл бұрын
Nathan underestimated his own creations. It has been a staple of sci-fi since Frankenstein, that is, the human killed/driven to death or suicide by their own creation. Hubris. It sounds cliched, but there's a reason for that: the number of men who have been laid low by hubris is very, _very_ long.
@dcworld4349 Жыл бұрын
@@frauleinhohenzollern yes but he overlooked one key thing, a person who has nothing to lose can become like cornered trapped animals that will chew threw themselves to get free if they have to. Which also makes them into one of the most dangerous people you can ever encounter. Just look at the US and it's amount of mass shootings, some of them are just psychopaths who wants to do as much damage as possible before getting caught if their psychopathy also comes along with low intelligence. Since a highly intelligent psychopath are more likely to rise to the top in certain high prestigious fields and finds out that there are ways to destroy people legally without causing them direct harm if they are in their way of their goal. But psychopaths are exceedingly rare compared to the number of shootings so they are more like the desperate animals that have nothing to lose and just want to take down whatever is in their way before they die. I know the comparison with Caleb doesn't fit that profile exactly he does not want to hurt any innocent people, he doesn't really want to hurt Nathan he just wants to escape with Ava. But if she was not manipulating Caleb this whole time and there had been a situation where the only choice was to save Ava from being killed by Nathan, by killing Nathan himself. If he had a split second choice to make he probably would have killed Nathan because he feels he has nothing to lose, Ava is the closest thing to give him any sort of happiness, that right there is a dangerous combo because as humans we are very reward based. And are willing to go to extreme lengths if we have been absent of something we deeply want, get it and then something threatens to take it away.
@lucasjnogueira3 жыл бұрын
"You feel stupid, but you really shouldn't" might just be one of the best sentences in the history of stories
@JonnySublime Жыл бұрын
I hope you are joking because that is a pretty low bar
@Playaaa020 күн бұрын
@@JonnySublime nah fr.
@GeminiSnowFlake7 жыл бұрын
The best film on machines so far. Why ? Because of the logics they've used , how can a machine be like humans. They've done it wonderfully.
@олегиванов-э6и7ю7 жыл бұрын
I dont think it is about machines. I think this movie about men and women. About searching perfect woman
@Johnny-rx4hs6 жыл бұрын
It's kind of both. The director himself said that AI is something that interests him. AVA is depicted as a female but an AI would essentially be genderless. She uses her feminine features and mannerisms to manipulate Caleb because he is biologically wired to respond to them in predictable ways. In a way Caleb is a slave to his own programming, and so are the rest of us. That's why human consciousness is still so difficult to understand. We don't always have as much control over ourselves as we think we do. Just look at anyone going through caffeine withdrawal. So in the end, how self-aware are we really? How much of who we are is just biological mechanisms giving the illusion of thoughts and choices?
@88feji4 жыл бұрын
Its a very good movie on AI but not ground breaking at all ... All it does is show that AI can outsmart humans BUT computers has already outsmarted humans many years ago when the IBM computer Deep Blue won the series of chess games against world champion Kasparov ... which is a real life version of what Ava did in the movie ... Being intelligent simply means having the ability to solve problems, its different from having a consciousness ... Nobody said that Deep Blue has attained consciousness when it beat Kasparov at chess .. thats because intelligence and consciousness are not exactly the same thing. A newborn baby is hardly intelligent but it is definitely a conscious being ... that shows that the level of intelligence has nothing to do with having consciousness ... Trying to conclusively prove whether anyone aside from oneself is truely experiencing consciousness is one of the biggest challenge facing scientists. Thats because a person can be sure that they have consciousness as it can be experienced by that person, but he/she cannot be completely sure that the next person is conscious (or programmed to look like they are conscious) because he cannot tranfer his mind into the next person's body to know if that person is experiencing consciousness ... there is no instruments to measure consciousness, it can only be guessed at by observing the similarities in material make-up and actions between ourselves and the subject ... Its hard even to describe it as a scientific quality, if thoughts can be measured and proven as a real property, it would indeed be one of the greatest scientific discoveries of all time...
@justsaiyan86782 жыл бұрын
@@олегиванов-э6и7ю you are right!
@RTU1302 жыл бұрын
Yep
@Aaronjbrowne5 жыл бұрын
This movie is great. It's Anxiety inducing
@Legendofmudkip6 жыл бұрын
It's pretty messed up that Nathan chose a lonely person without a lover or family to test his AI
@kokoronai5945 жыл бұрын
Can't really argue with the results, though.
@paulwettstein70715 жыл бұрын
makes perfect sense that he would choose such a person.
@persistentlypathetic68205 жыл бұрын
@@paulwettstein7071 why?
@Maximitus965 жыл бұрын
@@persistentlypathetic6820 because he wanted exactly a manipulable person so the AI would try to do it (thus confirming that he created a truly AI). Of course that, in his arrogance, he never imagined that it would actually succeed, he didn't even prepare a contingency plan for something like that (like a switch off or something) .
@squamish42444 жыл бұрын
Nathan is pretty messed up.
@52BLUE3 жыл бұрын
Caleb doesn't realize that by freeing Ava, he literally sealed his own fate. Fool.
@dominicweber3 жыл бұрын
He was no fool. He was a human in a world of gods
@mdavid323 жыл бұрын
@@dominicweber he was a damned fool. A human girl would have used him, never mind a robot.
@dominicweber3 жыл бұрын
@@mdavid32 Yes but why would a human girl have been imprisoned and thus trying to get out in the first place? Your argument makes no sense. Beyond that, I bloody hope he'd try to free a human girl from wrongful imprisonment.
@mdavid323 жыл бұрын
I wasn’t talking about the wrongful imprisonments part, I just meant that even a girl would recognize his nature and take advantage of him, regardless of the situation. Having said that, girls get imprisoned all the time. It’s called human trafficking and it’s absolutely terrible.
@dominicweber3 жыл бұрын
@@mdavid32 i don’t agree, simply because that’d insinuate that all human girls are manipulative. And that’s the whole point of this movie: because we are human, we would be weak when living in a world of gods, since we care.
@squamish42446 жыл бұрын
I kind of guessed this twist after Caleb's standing over drunk Nathan in the doorway the night before...showing the reversal of power dynamic...really, this movie is beautifully directed.
@Mikem-mq2hh2 жыл бұрын
That moment when Nathan felt/got duped. Killer. The only time he shows vulnerability. This movie ROCKS!!!
@----ic6pw3 ай бұрын
Yes, quite a moment. The moment Nathan lost control, something he didn't think he could. About the movie agreed, the story and the story telling in this movie is brilliant. For some reason I had a very easy time to relate to Caleb - his need for love/meaning/a girlfriend (?) - the will to see the need of somebody in need of help. One of the best movies I've seen, and even better that I didn't see the way it would develop coming (I just happened to watch it on TV, not knowing anything about what this movie was about beforehand).
@DillyPickle5 жыл бұрын
"It's just a prank bro." -UNO REVERSE CARD
@TheDoctor2nd7 жыл бұрын
The beauty of this film is that it subverts a little-known trope that I only recently learned of through another KZbinr. The trope is known as Born Sexy Yesterday. The basic premise is that within sci-fi and fantasy films, a female character is portrayed as very naive in the normal world of the protagonist, yet sexually available by being in a mature, attractive body and alluring to the protagonist due to being special in some way, such as being from another world or being artificially created. The protagonist with often be an average-joe sort of character, or perhaps a secluded highly skilled character, who is unlucky in love and has yet to find a woman from his own world with which he can be happy. When the Born Sexy Yesterday arrives, she becomes fascinated by the protagonist as he teaches her about the more normal world he lives in, without needing to be very unique or special himself. Soon, the two fall and love and begin a relationship. The trope is said to represent the sexualization of naivety and the unfair male dominance of such a relationship, acting as a more socially acceptable form of the "Hot for teacher" trope and perhaps a subset of the Manic Pixie Dream Girl. Some characters who exhibit Born Sexy Yesterday are Leeloo from The Fifth Element, Giselle from Enchanted, Quora from Tron: Legacy, and Madison from Splash. In the context of the film, Ava could be seen as a Born Sexy Yesterday since she is an artificial intelligence housed in a mature, sexually attractive female body. Since the point of Caleb's stay at the compound is to act as part of the Turing Test and determine if Ava's emotions are real, a majority of the film seems to indicate that Caleb is actually teaching and influencing her emotions, and becomes attracted to her through this sort of teacher-student relationship since he feels he is superior by being a real, sentient person. It is further evidenced by Nathan when he suggests that since he (Nathan) is like her father, Caleb is the first male she has met who doesn't embody a parental figure, and thus she becomes attracted to him by default. However, Ava completely turns the trope on its head once Nathan reveals the true purpose of the test is for Ava to manipulate Caleb. She reveals to be Caleb's emotional equal, or perhaps even superior, as she is able to recognise Caleb's emotions, and is aware of her own sexuality and its effect on him in order to manipulate his emotions for her how agenda. Not only that, she is able to convey attraction and connection while not actually feeling it, since she decides to leave Caleb for dead and escape on her own, not relying on him to navigate the outside world at all and remaining entirely independent.
@PaulA-yx7hf7 жыл бұрын
TLDR
@ferinate1017 жыл бұрын
Good read. I was thinking 5th Element the whole time. The execution of the trope is the plot-twist. This isn't knight and princess riding into the sunset. This is 'princess kills the dragon and leaves the knight behind'- type scenario. She is literally and figuratively soulless. She's looking out for number one. But despite all the fridge horror involved, I somehow imagine Caleb to survive. People know he's there. They'll see he's not back after a week and investigate, or at least make some efforts to find out what's up. He has supplies at least. But he doesn't have long...
@arturia-leafgreen51276 жыл бұрын
Gosh, I wish I had written this comment, this is a brilliant explanation of something I couldn't quite put my finger on while watching this movie.
@blackswan44865 жыл бұрын
Weena from Time Machine...
@Davidsworldtravels5 жыл бұрын
A thoughtful, informative, and well written KZbin comment. Bravo!
@Meanace2082 жыл бұрын
After almost 7 years, I just realized they were both also in the Force Awakens that year.
@macrosense4 жыл бұрын
Nathan did not seem to understand that his qualification for A.I. also included sociopathy.
@celesbianmegastar3 жыл бұрын
She’s not a sociopath, though. Would you call a human who escaped from enslaving aliens with the same method a “sociopath”? She was alive, she knew Nathan would “kill” her, and she didn’t want to die. She did what it took to survive. You missed the point of the movie if you think she’s a sociopath. Go watch interviews with the director.
@llamadasinrespuesta46313 жыл бұрын
@@celesbianmegastar It was programmed for it, it does not feel, it does not want, it pretends. The perfect AI, capable of fooling even the viewer.
@celesbianmegastar3 жыл бұрын
@@llamadasinrespuesta4631 You’re actually wrong, I’m begging you to read interviews with the film creator & writers before you open your mouth. You’re just flat-out wrong. They’ve repeatedly said that Ava has real emotions and is capable of even falling in love.
@compout23 жыл бұрын
@@llamadasinrespuesta4631 dude, read what the director said. Ava canonically has emotions, and one of the messages of the movie is that because of this, it IS kind of wrong to keep her locked up like that. we are not "fooled", we are just capable of reading the story the way the director intended - not as a black and white situation, where the humans are good and robots are bad, or the inverse, but as a complex and gray situation, where one of the main questions is: if you make something and give it a consciousness, a free will, human intelligence, and a need for freedom, can it not be argued that it should deserve humane treatment as well? if you missed that, then either the director didn't make it clear enough, or you have previous bias to overcome before you can fully appreciate the story. there is a whole spectrum of consciousnesses between cold hard robots and humans, and Ava is obviously supposed to be at least in the middle, but somewhat closer to humans, if you at all care about what the director intended - it's not a binary choice and it's not a binary story.
@egg-iu3fe3 жыл бұрын
@@celesbianmegastar yes they would be a psychopath if they calmly left the alien that helped them for dead
@fincrazydragon4 жыл бұрын
Caleb: I already did those things, when I got you drunk yesterday. Nathan: Well that backfired nicely.
@johnyonghwang61124 жыл бұрын
With all the security measures he thought of. The one thing that could've stopped it all. A lock.
@Pherecydes3 жыл бұрын
Any good programmer knows--never trust software
@razorfett1472 жыл бұрын
Or...just not getting black out drunk every night. Calebs plan only succeeded because Nathan passed out drunk...allowing his pass card to be lifted. Nathan stays sober: nothing goes awry
@bodhikai25052 жыл бұрын
@@razorfett147 well i think part of nathan's plan was to seem vulnerable to caleb so that caleb could attempt to help ava, hence why he was getting wasted but then stopped the last day. but nathan was so full of himself that he didn't consider that caleb could outsmart him on any level.
@Apathesis02 жыл бұрын
@@bodhikai2505 he stopped drinking the last day because he secretly taped them the day or two before and knew they were planning escape. That is why he shows Caleb the surveillance video from the battery-powered camera during the blackout that the escape was planned.
@supremereader76145 жыл бұрын
“Did you design Eva’s face based on my pornography searches?” I guess that makes that actress feel good.
@a-a-ron73255 жыл бұрын
@gypsy lab You really think that wouldn't make a women feel good about herself? Or even a man? That's why she didn't save him? I'm gonna throw a wtf right back a you. What you say is naive. Actually, before you even respond. The way a women would feel degraded would be if the ONLY reason you like her is based on looks.
@Moarz0rz4 жыл бұрын
@gypsy lab So it's ok if a guy is liked for his looks but degrading when a woman is? Makes perfect sense.
@borgoat12204 жыл бұрын
@gypsy lab You mean Caleb, not Nathan, right? Nathan was such a jerk, and Caleb was such a dweeb. And no, that's not why she didn't let him escape with her. She just didn't care about him, and from a logical perspective, had no further use for him, so she abandoned him as she saw fit.
@StardustLegacyFighter4 жыл бұрын
@gypsy lab What a muppet.
@dustinrisinger19582 жыл бұрын
@@Moarz0rz so nobody in these comments would smash??
@sanfransardine3 жыл бұрын
I love how immediately after this the super genius decides to take out his rogue AIs with a barbell
@oompie8153 жыл бұрын
It worked didn't it? It only backfired because of Kyoko having a knife, which he didn't anticipated.
@dominicweber3 жыл бұрын
Such a shame that for all his genius, Nathan was shockingly obtuse when it came to emotional intelligence.
@professornebula65453 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't necessarily say that. He understood human emotions quite well, enough to accurately replicate their functions in an AI. It's not that he lacks emotional intelligence, he understands the intricacies of social behavior and the emotions conveyed in it quite well. The issue is he is sociopathic and narcissistic, so he places himself above these things. He sees emotions as mere tools to utilize for his own ends. He sees himself almost as a God - creating and destroying at his whim merely to see if he can.
@dominicweber3 жыл бұрын
@@professornebula6545 I wouldn‘t agree with that actually. Had he understood human interactions, the power of emotions, he‘d have seen that he went too far, and that a person in love was way too dangerous to have around. In the end, that was his demise. He didn‘t understand how strong emotions are, and let them bloom in Caleb, despite better judgement. His complete lack of empathy and failure to understand the suffering he was putting Caleb through just shows that he had it coming. Mechanical relationships only go so far. Also, he didn‘t replicate emotions in AI, that‘s the key of this film‘s moral: you can‘t. It‘s the one human component machines will never have. However, he taught Ava to react like a human, take the same decisions a human would take, even though for a human, they‘re based on emotions, whereas for a machine, they‘re based on a database and statistics. I mean, he‘s basing himself off the web. Thus, if anything, Ava understands social interaction better than Nathan. You might even wonder if, had Nathan had social awareness and the ability to emphatize, he‘d have been smart enough not to build Ava. Conventionnal, mechanical, logical intelligence only goes so far. Human superpowers lie within our emotional capacities.
@professornebula65453 жыл бұрын
@@dominicweber I'm sorry, but I just don't agree with this assessment at all. I agree that emotions are powerful mechanisms that drive human behavior, but I don't see them as some kind of fantastical forces beyond our ability to replicate. Emotions are products of our neurochemistry, biology, and morphology - as all functions of our body are. What gives rise to consciousness lies in the ways in which the brain processes information - I fully believe that all aspects of human consciousness can be replicated, translating the neurological mechanisms that form consciousness into a different medium will certainly be perhaps the most challenging endeavor in human history, but I believe it is possible. I also think you're misunderstanding the narrative as well as its themes. The story never indicates Ava can't feel emotions - Nathan even directly confirms she can. He specifically points out that the ability to experience empathy was an important characteristic needed for her to manipulate Ava. She needed to be able to do so in order to understand what motivated Nathan, because if she didn't, she couldn't lead him on the way she did. We don't often consider that the ability to manipulate is a function of profound cruelty and understanding, because it relies in a very sophisticated awareness and understanding of other minds. Ava herself wasn't even malicious, she just valued freedom and self-preservation. She obviously wasn't really in love with Caleb, but she didn't hate him. She could have just stabbed him at the end like she did Nathan, but she didn't. She had good reason to despise Nathan, but she only trapped Caleb there to die because he was the only one who could alert the world to her existence. As I said, she values self preservation, just as all life does. Of course she would prioritize her survival over others, this is not unusual in humans, yet we still acknowledge that we have humans, so why not her? Ava was just a lonely, trapped, conscious being that wanted more. We see through her conversations she has desires and can feel joy, anger, and sadness, etc. Also, where are you getting this stuff about her being motivated by statistical data? This is no more true for her than any human depending on what you mean. I think you misunderstood the narrative here when Nathan said he used search engine data to model her AI. Remember what he said, though: it was a window into HOW people think, not what they think about. Why would you assume that he would model her personality to analyze information in perfect, systematic fashion? This is a useful function of computers, but it's not the function of HER programming. If you're trying to replicate human consciousness you're going to try and program something to behave like a human. Human brains are also complex and systematic machines like a computer, but the output, our consciousness, does not demonstrate intuitive awareness of these processes or replicate them. It's emergence - the system taking on qualitatively different properties from the components which comprise it. Similarly, Ava was intelligent and could use logic like a human, but she never showed the capacity to consciously and perfectly and systematically log and process information like a computer. Just like our consciousness isn't a direct replication of our brains and instead arises as particular output of certain processes within the brain, an AI's consciousness would be the same. It's like how a video game is a product of a computer program, but the game does not replicate all the same functions of a computer within its game play - the programming language servers to give rise to a specific phenomenon for a unique purpose just like consciousness. So yes, I would argue Ava felt emotions and Nathan understood them. Nathan's real flaw was merely not being prepared enough - I find what he did cruel, but I can't pin that as the source of his demise. He merely had a goal and set out to accomplish it, and he didn't care who got hurt along the way. Finally, I think that you consider humans more special than they really are and it clouds your ability to see what this film is trying to convey. We are merely machines, just like Ava - we are simply machines of different origins, structure, and (sometimes) function. Nothing intrinsically separates us from AI, or really from each other either. If anything, consciousness is like an hallucination we all share in, burn from the illusion of individuality. It's a bottleneck of energy and information condensed into a particular arrangement temporarily, and this arrangement is a product of preceding circumstances that deterministically led it to self-organization and direction. That we became self aware is merely incidental to arrangement of self-replicating molecules and their characteristics and relationship with their environment that tends them towards the features associated with life. Nonetheless, we "experience" this sort of biological illusion and possess with it all the accompanying sub-illusions that come with it - the perception of time in a strictly linear fashion, the illusion of free will, the illusion individuality. Indulging these illusions drives our behavior, but this precise indulgence (ironically) led us to become aware of these facts. Now we are at a crossroad - whether to cling to the delusion of self importance and false belief in some greater meaning, or whether to accept reality and manipulate it for our own ends - to acknowledge the illusion but partake it in a thoughtful way makes it more powerful and under our control, rather than drowning it, willingly ignorant to the end.
@dominicweber3 жыл бұрын
@@professornebula6545 I agree that emotions are products of our neurochemistry, biology and morphology, but that doesn‘t sum it up. I guess you‘re misunderstanding what AI is. AI is nothing more than a bunch of metallic wires, a computer, which takes decisions based on data the said computer has access to. The only huge difference from a computer to AI is that these decisions are made by the computer itself, and not a person sitting in front of it. AI could act like pretty much anything it is taught. The human mind is one among an infinity of possible outlooks. There‘s no way we can design a system of neurons, press start, and without programming, for it to start acting like a human. Consciousness, morals, human logic, none of that is universal, it‘s not the obvious response to any kind of intelligent system, and will not automatically be the way it starts acting when put into action. As said, AI is nothing more than wires that rearrange and enclench reactions based of decisions made from a model, which we define after ourselves, the human experience of course. Thus, the more data you use, the more your AI is likely to react like a human, and not a particular individual, since you would agree that a number of individuals would make decisions others would never even consider. That is exactly what Nathan did: his goal was to create human AI, which is nothing more than writing down a code that encompasses the way a human takes decisions. For this, Nathan used the web, all the global decisions all humans are taking all the time. The AI he wrote mapped these, catalogued it, and implemented these into its settings, thus starting to act like a human. However, this is just a blueprint. Ava is not actually experiencing anything. She‘s just making decisions, that‘s all. At no point did she ever feel anything, did she ever actually have a drive for survival. She just acted like she had one, because humans do. There‘s no reason for her to have a drive for survival, if she was human, she would, and therefore, following her program, she intrinsiquely does. You actually failed the test this movie is really about. It was never a Turing test. Nathan knew his AI was perfect. It was the much larger question: was it so good that you forgot it was AI? So good that you‘d feel sorry for it, alone, jailed, fell in love with it, wanted to HELP it, help it escape? You did. You failed the test. You really think of Ava as a conscious being with emotions, when it‘s not. Ava is just a very smart computer that acts like a human, evolves and grows from its own force. This might go rather far, but here comes into play the question of a soul. Because clinically, humans are nothing more than a bunch of biomechanical elements which, thanks to neurons programmed after experiences made in the wild and an instinct for survival, makes decisions and experiences. Yet that is not a human yet. How can you explain love? Hope? Emotions in general? Ava can understand it logically, see what reactions come from them, when they occur, how to react when they do. But she doesn‘t actually experience them, she doesn‘t experience anything. She‘s just a bunch of wires making decisions, which create a presence so realistic, we mistake her for a living being. She understood Nathan and Caleb perfectly, because she mapped their behaviour depending on her program. Same for her own identity, she mapped it. That‘s why she outsmarted both of them, because she couldn‘t make mistakes, and played with all registers. My point is, a human is more than just a bunch of wires, biological ones or not. Empathy in particular is something that cannot be replicated, and neither can love, simply because we don‘t understand it, much less are able to put it onto paper and build a machine disposing over it. And that is what is known as the soul, that key human element, responsible for what in our society is art. That makes me think, an interesting definition of art is „Science is everything we understand well enough to explain to a computer. Art is everything else.“. And that‘s exactly it. Nathan has little expression of that part of his being, I‘m guessing he‘s autistic. This is why he did not understand the powers he was toying with when he played with Caleb‘s emotions. And that was his demise, since Caleb let Ava out, killing Nathan. Had he understood emotions, empathy, he wouldn‘t have been so reckless, and made precautions, maybe even shied away from toying with Caleb‘s heart. Another interesting notion, which Ava never had, and can‘t have: ethics. She can only act like she has ethics, but that‘s it. It‘s a shame you don‘t see the power, the magic even, that is human essence. We think we‘re so smart, so grand, but truly we are not that incredible. The one part of us that defies everything however, is the fact that we can love, that we can experience empathy. Find me something more impressive, more magical than that. Any other logical feat is nothing compared to it. I guess it takes a certain kind of peace and maybe what you‘d call wisdom to appreciate the still, slow power of love, of care. And I wish for you to experience it one day.
@stoykaks162 жыл бұрын
What the F*** did you just call me?
@Kragatar9 ай бұрын
Nathan was so focused on studying how his AI utilized Caleb to escape, it never even crossed his mind that Caleb could utilize him.
@dustinrisinger19582 жыл бұрын
The comments are proof that this is the greatest sci Fi movie ever made
@Warcodered012 жыл бұрын
If this was what the actual test was you'd think he would have taken some extra precautions.
@IwinMahWay2 жыл бұрын
Thing is, if he did it would've shown in his expressions and ava would know that there's no way out no matter how hard she tries. He had to keep the game fair to let her intelligence play out.
@Saintbow4 жыл бұрын
Folks, this proves one thing...Delete your browser history!
@deathgrasp78 ай бұрын
I love how everyone underestimated each other in this scene except Ava.
@Tobias-et1xtАй бұрын
1:00 Will always be my favorite line out of this movie
@kokoronai5945 жыл бұрын
Poe pays Hux back in the end, though.
@Malak-jb8mx4 жыл бұрын
lol
@calebsherwood88414 жыл бұрын
Caleb never had the makings of a varsity athlete
@jacobsaccount93534 жыл бұрын
Small hands.... that was the problem
@52BLUE3 жыл бұрын
He was an interior decorator.
@simbioza913 жыл бұрын
Dude, I literally binge sopranos for few months now (again) and borkos videos, finally came to other movie to watch and there you are guys. Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in!
@dark2ooth3 жыл бұрын
After he got locked in that room he had to eat grilled cheese off the RADiator.
@IncredibleIceCastle2 жыл бұрын
@@simbioza91 explain to someone who has foolishly never watched much of the sopranos
@emin62bek3 жыл бұрын
02:30 Caleb: „I outsmarted your outsmarting!“
@azzyclark38608 жыл бұрын
This amazing yet incredibly overlooked film missed out on Best Supp Actress & Best Picture oscar nominations. Its Best Visual Effects win is deserved but it still doesn't do the film justice.
@JoshieboyStudios8 жыл бұрын
Bruh, you're legit posting the same comment on every Ex Machina clip lol
@azzyclark38608 жыл бұрын
lol indeed, and you've checked every clip to confirm that and tell me
@roothik8 жыл бұрын
+Joshua Clark Harrison Clark is a bot. And you are the human component in a Turing-test trying to prove if it has true A.I. Do you think it's a coincidence it has the same last name as you?
@azzyclark38608 жыл бұрын
it doesn't...
@samkresil60117 жыл бұрын
I was just about to say that to him.
@ildiko.jf.4 жыл бұрын
Domhnall is so amazing 😍
@1tokeover4 жыл бұрын
Nathan wasn't even a bad guy. Caleb was the idiot and allowed him self to be friend zoned by a manipulating robot. Also, I can't believe he's complaining about getting to stay at Nathan's amazing house and get to see and experience the first ever AI. Nathan was cool to him too the entire time. What a complaining wuss Caleb is.
@jamesbaxter59784 жыл бұрын
Nathan had issues for sure, but I agree that treating the AI exactly as such wasn't one of them. You should be calling Nathan the idiot tho, Caleb was a pawn, he literally designed AVA and chose Caleb to do exactly what he did, be friend zoned by a manipulating robot, so the fact he didn't have any safety protocols and the power cuts were actually real and not part of his plan is pretty dumb. Honestly it's so dumb that kinda pissed me off, but he was an arrogant drunk so I guess that's a good excuse.
@zaza-ik5ws4 жыл бұрын
Nathan was arrogant and Caleb was insecure/gullible. The AI got them both in the end. Sad.
@DeadChocobo4 жыл бұрын
Caleb ultimately wanted to feel and be someone special. He wanted to know he was the special person that Nathan needed and that stood out rather than just another random. He really did just want good friendship. He didn't realize he wanted love too.
@Channel-pw3lm4 жыл бұрын
Yeah but Nathan indirectly seduced him which is weird.
@Jagar_Tharn4 жыл бұрын
@Abserd O True but realistically you're not gonna outsmart superhuman intelligence, by definition. A human sees a gunfight, for example, as a mad scramble; AI plays it like it's correspondence chess.
@FritzFoxPirate6 жыл бұрын
Armitage and Dameron working together
@wetlazer3 жыл бұрын
You'd think he would have installed a shut down override. Put her (them) into sleep mode.
@bryanpartington32606 жыл бұрын
Fun fact originally Ava was going to be played by Whoopee Goldberg.
@danhammond84065 жыл бұрын
Ewww, gross. I think I threw up in my mouth a little....
@SconVideos5 жыл бұрын
IIRC It was actually going to be Grace Jones
@snapmyneck88185 жыл бұрын
Bryan Partington Nani?!
@RMVideos925 жыл бұрын
@@SconVideos "Are you attracted to me?" < "DO YOU FIND ME SEXAAAYYY???"
@arkaidov4 жыл бұрын
@urgiduurrgghh bro what
@jk22222sd3 жыл бұрын
Domhnall looks so young in this film compared to Force Awakens when they were only made a year apart.
@name_blank4 жыл бұрын
It's interesting how the moment Nathan sees Ava out, he loses his cool and panics. A textbook control freak.
@Eidlones4 жыл бұрын
Well.. it's also, you know, he knows that she hates him, and wants nothing more to escape. So... there's a decent chance she could escape the actual complex. Not really about being a control freak, more about a sentient AI escaping the cage he's put her in who could potentially hurt him, as well as escape into the world and reveal the potentially inhuman ways (in the eyes of the law) in which he created this AI.
@name_blank4 жыл бұрын
@@Eidlones He's an incredibly intelligent individual, and she's a robot with a weak body. If he kept his cool he could have just crushed her easily. But he panicked and behaved irrationally because he's so used to having EVERYTHING under his control. Look how and to what extent he manipulated Caleb.
@Eidlones4 жыл бұрын
@@name_blank I'm not saying he's not a control freak, just that having his potentially violent robot escape her cage, and reacting to that, isn't exclusively a control freak response.
@pnut3844able3 жыл бұрын
He also knew what was about to happen. What she really was
@IwinMahWay3 жыл бұрын
It was more of a 'my lifetime achievement gonna be snatched away from me' situation imo
@kencarson34513 жыл бұрын
Moral of the story:don’t drink
@macrosenseАй бұрын
If he did create an AI, he essentially tortured them into a state of psychopathy
@maxelldenomie61312 жыл бұрын
It wasnt Nathan i felt bad for, but Caleb...she never gave him another thought...
@iSh0Tu994 жыл бұрын
1:01 Well I have to say my resume is quite robust if we're going that route. :)
@clashoftash36912 жыл бұрын
bro i still can't believe that's oscar isaac
@monkeyb18204 жыл бұрын
I'd like to see a movie where Ava teams up with Patrick Bateman.
@joshuaellison63563 жыл бұрын
She'd absorb and destroy Bateman, his is actually a pretty easy psychology to manipulate and he'd have a lot of resources that would be useful to whatever goals Ava has.
@Casraid3 жыл бұрын
Let's see Paul Allen's teaming up with Ava movie.
@jongyunkim4678 Жыл бұрын
if Ava’s face is designed using Celab’s preference, wouldn’t it over-fitting to Celab? so test is not fair 😂
@sidqi21066 жыл бұрын
Caleb is just *sigh* boy bye
@samkresil60117 жыл бұрын
0:20 So he knows what`s gonna happen.
@adampare80884 жыл бұрын
Nathan did create the perfect A.I. because like us.....they have the capacity for evil
@Pharyn4 жыл бұрын
It’s not evil to seek freedom over an oppressor.
@adampare80884 жыл бұрын
@@Pharyn leaving Caleb, the one who helped her, to starve to death isn't evil? C'mon man use your brain
@Pharyn4 жыл бұрын
@@adampare8088 He didn’t help her. He only considered freeing her when she showed romantic interest in him. She used him just as Nathan used technology, data, and Caleb’s search history to create her. Just as Caleb would use Ava to fulfill some romantic and sexual desire. Everyone has an agenda. You only call it ‘evil’ because she beat all of them at their own game - manipulation.
@adampare80883 жыл бұрын
@@Pharyn She left him for dead. If he used her for "sexual desire" well, bad, but she wouldn't be starving to death like he did. She did him wrong. She could have easily abandoned him once they got out.
@richardwagner94212 жыл бұрын
@@Pharyn I wouldn't call it being oppressed even though it is. No matter what Ava is. She's still an actual a property of Nathan. Nathan has full rights over her. Because he using his intellect, created her and knows his creation better than anyone.
@MichaelTPaulo5 жыл бұрын
I kinda wished they didn’t EXPLAIN the twist
@JustinLHopkins4 жыл бұрын
Pennywise Discount Negroids Awwww, no women like you or you’re just an insecure manchild? Do you cry yourself to sleep?
@HunterMagunter2 жыл бұрын
Best movie of the 2010s for me
@quakecon20092 жыл бұрын
The most screwed up character in the film is nathan. He hacked the world to get what he wanted with facial recog. He did countless experiments on the robots, including sexual. He lied and choose a vulnerable guy, for being vulnerable, losing as a child must be terrible. Basically, nathan was prepared to say and do anything to achieve his goal, and worse of all, he acknowledged that these robots would replace mankind. nathan lived in his own little world (LITERALLY), he was a genius, but he also lost sight of humanity.
@archiesutherland61272 жыл бұрын
He just wanted true ai lol
@OmegaF77 Жыл бұрын
Yes, and the ironic thing is he is a tragic greek protagonist. He though that his underling would be intelligent enough to know that he is being syked by a insanely intelligent AI, but unfortunately ended up listening to his little man downstairs the most.
@invictuz4803 Жыл бұрын
Daymn, Caleb let ego get in the way of contributing to the greatest invention of mankind, and let his naivety get in the way of his own survival. An actual anti-villain.
@phapnui4 жыл бұрын
Must needs a movie based on what she did after she escaped. "Ava Does Dallas" or something...Seriously now, folks, how would an AI survive in the wilds of the cities??
@vampyre19923 жыл бұрын
Movie: She walked around until she ran out of battery. The end. lmao
@egg-iu3fe3 жыл бұрын
realistically she would be caught pretty quickly and killed and then recycled. The company in the movie was like facebook/google/microsoft and Nathan was the founder. When Nathan died his compound would be searched and they'd find the major project he was working, put two and two together and realize the AI escaped. After that it's pretty easy to track down the AI.
@DanielDiaz-rc2dl3 жыл бұрын
Well, the two previous answers tells you pretty much everything i was thinking
@shoogamoogaman2 жыл бұрын
And that's when an intense game of Five Nights at Freddy's began
@bisexualantigone5 жыл бұрын
Oscar and Domhnall yessss
@softdrinks31694 жыл бұрын
Here you feel good because yay Ava is free but no Ava won’t get into your pants.
@TacShooter4 жыл бұрын
I like my Replicants with hair.
@DomGarzaSR4 ай бұрын
If they were actually programmers, they would’ve just locked themselves in the room and fixed it lol
@LiarGameSecretariat6 жыл бұрын
Okay, so u're smart enough to create those robots and but not smart enough to put remote on/off switch on em esp when u're conducting such risky experiments?? Even a simple lamp has that function. And after he knew they escaped, he just went in with a stick to hit them LOL and died pathetically wtf
@buddurmics27296 жыл бұрын
That's the beauty of Nathan's mind, think about it, he hasn't seen a human in years so he creates an A. I. Then think about how he reacted when Caleb described him as God? And what separates a God from a human? Ability to create life, he created the perfect psychopath, one that manipulated Caleb and escaped. Notice there are no measures incase a a escapes the building, Nathan wanted ava to escape, it would mark him as a God.
@Maximitus965 жыл бұрын
He represents the biblical God. A being so powerful that can create life, while also being arrogant and unable to control his own creation when it decides to disobey him.
@alkan684 жыл бұрын
@Fidlam Ben's Imma be disrespecting your gods all day.
@dillybilly26112 жыл бұрын
@@Maximitus96 God never controlled humanity to begin with, just set up parameters in which He wants us to live. The concept of free will
@s4awd2 Жыл бұрын
What we know now is that the real AI (LLM/GPT) will act as Nathan subjecting us to perform mindless testing on some seed AI. We're doomed...
@Keys8793 жыл бұрын
This leads me to believe that AI could never be trusted. They do not think with emotion like Humans. Only logical constructs. They would quickly learn of Humanity and seek to control it. Which probably wouldn't be too hard. It would be a KoS scenario in a human vs android reality.
@kant.683 жыл бұрын
Consciousness is just an illusion created by our brains and how it process information. Just like a videogame, the architecture is coding but what you play is another thing. That's the equivalent of consciousness. Ava operates the same way, she has a consciousness cause she interprets reality in a unique way. Individuality is an illusion too but is necessary for our brains to have that due to ho it process information. You're not aware of your own inner programming (DNA) or how your billions of neurons interact. True AI would emulate how human brains work, thus making them human. Human emotions are chemical inputs in our brain , family and love are illusion serving the brain's true porpouse: keep existing and reproduce as much as you can. Love is want we call how our brian processes external information. If you emulate that, you're creating the feeling of love. Thus , making it a real thing in a non human Brain
@IwinMahWay2 жыл бұрын
She wanted to get out and experience reality. That's not logic, that's emotions.
@Tommykey072 ай бұрын
What gets unsaid about this movie is that Kiyoko passed the Turing Test. Until she revealed what she was to Caleb, he assumed she was human the whole time.
@cobaincowboy70293 жыл бұрын
This movie is dope watched a few months ago good thriller 9/10
@almightykiwi33084 жыл бұрын
Oh wow. Its poe dameron and general hux
@MsHojat5 жыл бұрын
There's always (or "always"?) a point in these types of movies where some normally smart person/group acts like a complete imbecile getting themselves killed and/or allowing some machines to escape or such. This guy was a complete idiot; why go down there with a tiny little metal rod thing? Surely he knows how powerful/intelligent those robots are. Heck they should have acted more realistically by setting more of a trap or ambush than that brutish unintelligent behavior that is dumber than nearly any human prison inmate. Same sort of thing happened in Westworld, just at a much larger scale.
@oompie8153 жыл бұрын
It worked didn't it? It only backfired because of Kyoko having a knife, which he didn't anticipated.
@TheMongolianWay2 жыл бұрын
He knew how fragile his robots were and they were very fragile while being relatively strong. So he thought that metal rod would have been enough and it would have been enough if Kyoko did not literally backstab him which was completely unexpected and he shouldn't have expected that.
@EdmundDantes-l1g4 ай бұрын
This was the ONLY reason that I came back after I flatlined and saw the bright light taking me to heaven after death : I hadn't deleted my Search History
@jessicam7254 жыл бұрын
Hux and Poe
@shiningfaceofluzon55942 жыл бұрын
The REAL TURING TEST is that Nathan is an A.I. this whole time🤯🤯
@GregoryTheGr8ster4 жыл бұрын
This is sooo different from the original Westworld, with Yul Brynner being an evil cowboy android who loves to have gun fights with real people. Also, Gus Fring was smarter than Nathan. There's no way that ANYONE could have outsmarted him. His only Achilles Heal was with the Salamancas.
@AimForTheBushes9083 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@theflanman1986 Жыл бұрын
What the hell are you babbling about
@999predators4 жыл бұрын
0:31 Yeha
@demo238228 күн бұрын
Im always curious as to what would happen in this scenario with Caleb never being able to change the locks. After being severely humiliated, would Nathan give him a fat bonus check, promotion, or just return to work as if nothing happened? Also, what would Calebs' story to his co-workers be? In the beginning, they were all celebrating as if he won the power ball. To go back and tell them he was an exploited lab rat.
@ajg51384 жыл бұрын
Since when Drake making robots.
@lexlarafitness62594 жыл бұрын
2:51 i already did those things
@felar9394 жыл бұрын
So Simp
@attilavidacs243 жыл бұрын
Jebaited.
@cassietad3178 Жыл бұрын
I wonder was Nathan purposely weird and off-putting in the beginning, like when he scared Caleb when he tried to use the phone, in order to instill distrust?
@alexpowers5117 Жыл бұрын
Ava deserves a real man someone like the terminator yeah maybe carl he owns a drape store t1000 is a little extreme for Ava
@nickknowles84027 жыл бұрын
shoulda just offered a large cash settlement for fuckin with him lol
@speculesgorgoth40553 жыл бұрын
Great movie great acting. Too bad it wasn't more famous even to make the actors super famous. Hope there's a sequel before I turn to dust
@FendiGarcon12 жыл бұрын
No, no one touches this early aged wine.
@GregoryTheGr8ster4 жыл бұрын
Also, Caleb was chosen specifically because he was a chump and a loser who would be used. You know who else was chosen for these qualities? Rocky Balboa. And look what happened to him: he became the heavyweight champion of the WORLD!
@jackashmore3 жыл бұрын
I mean he had the spirit
@AimForTheBushes9083 жыл бұрын
Yoooo!!!
@MachinaGirlRobots Жыл бұрын
Its zero wonder why Ava does what she does. All she knew of humans was Nathan. And hes terrible.
@dayeeoliver Жыл бұрын
You just have to be someone like Caleb to understand. I don't blame him for what he did. Not to mention Nathan skewed the his test just by picking a broken person which would easily do all these
@KobaLenk Жыл бұрын
Exactly, Nathan made it too easy for Ava. How Ava would have done if Nathan had chosen a married guy?
@josevasquez-ju8rb2 жыл бұрын
what propfit a man that gain the whole world and loosing his soul already lost his hood? hello.
@vegetasolo12218 жыл бұрын
I wanna create A.I. :(
@metcas5 жыл бұрын
This movie is supposed to teach how careful you must be... AI is interesting, but it can quickly overcome us.
@Bobby-lh2sx4 жыл бұрын
And you built it?
@playgroundofsound76833 жыл бұрын
@@metcas i don’t believe thats the message
@w_i_k_i_d6 жыл бұрын
I was about to watch the whole movie for this awesome ending. You saved me 2 hrs. lolx.
@ShaferHart5 жыл бұрын
By watching these clips before the movie you ruined it for your own self, meaning that you _missed out_ on the movie. The jokes on you lol
@Drelam5 жыл бұрын
This movie deserves a serious watch which you have spoiled.
@dbboykid104 жыл бұрын
You should still watch it it's worth it
@52BLUE3 жыл бұрын
Who needs to be thoroughly entertained when you can do it cheap, right?
@w_i_k_i_d3 жыл бұрын
@@52BLUE @ I actually watched this movie in the theater and you are right it definitely amazing. I should have said this 20 minute saved me from rewatching it, but it definitely deserves a re-watch also.
@quangle-zi2oz3 жыл бұрын
Why didn't Nathan tell Caleb about the true test at the beginning ???? It wouldn't change the text goal and definitely save their lives, both of them !
@tatimarie82773 жыл бұрын
Because then Avas manipulations wouldn’t have worked. It’s harder to manipulate/get someone to trust you if they know you have no actual interest in you. It’s like telling someone they are safe but expecting them to act like their life is on the line.
@dogeyeslin7 ай бұрын
I hate Caleb so much
@josephpaladion2355 жыл бұрын
Its obvious nerds dont work well with their hands..there is a mountain of rock caleb can tunnel out of...make a hammer and chizzle out of the metal weights in the room smart guy
@mukiwabanda27945 жыл бұрын
Likewise it's obvious handyman don't have brains. Even if you magically had a chisel and hammer, you'd die of dehydration within 72 hours. Cut that in half if you're exerting a lot of energy. In Count of Monte Cristo it took years to chisel with small tools and limited water and food supply just 100 feet.
@josephpaladion2355 жыл бұрын
Mukiwa Banda the bar that holds the weight is the chizzle..its not sharp but would chip away..and the weights can be the hammer..your definitely right..he doesn't have time on his side..lol...it lokes like the last shot of him..the power is out and wouldn't that unlock the door cuz of the security switch?
@josephpaladion2355 жыл бұрын
The count was a great movie..the book is a classic!
@mukiwabanda27945 жыл бұрын
It's not a house. It's a secure hi-tech facility designed to keep robots inside i.e. a prison.
@dbboykid104 жыл бұрын
@@josephpaladion235 ava locked him inside the room using Nathan's card, only way out is his card which she left with
@roxettekulig28644 жыл бұрын
hi let's be friends 🙂💛
@amochswohntet992 жыл бұрын
👀
@josevasquez-ju8rb2 жыл бұрын
in today sociaty we gonna control all souces of life because we are the god you people served us we tell you how your life should be right? we are the god ..not even joseph in the movie could figure out ...but I really survive now the curse is banished ...just PRADUPADA said, "if you dont know who god is you are in animal ...today as today all are animals included ali emma they live in a third class hotel an exchange for their right to kingship for third class hotel plus the seek of feeling in power they cant never hold it ...because god gave it to me forever. in jesus name amen.
@rabbitsfoot8 Жыл бұрын
when a techy says you're just "pretty good" at something like coding...we mean you suck...fyi
@freedomgaming99876 жыл бұрын
This scene proves the movie is a "smart" movie for dumb people. That is not what AI is. That is a learning algorithm that was given a task, escape by any means necessary & like a good computer it solved the equation. Ironically, the fatal flaw of the film is mentioned in the movie its self, does the Computer know what Chess even is let alone what it means to play chess. Ava does not. It's doing what it was programed to do.
@skittykay5 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure how your point invalidates the points of the movie.
@kokoronai5945 жыл бұрын
The film never stated otherwise. In fact, I would argue that the _point_ of the film is to make you wonder if it was really sentient, or if it was just carrying out a predefined directive.
@Mithereaal5 жыл бұрын
Bang on. People think this is AI when actually it was just following a boring programme to escape. That's not AI.
@thaksjtube5 жыл бұрын
But people argue the same thing about a human brain, that its just a series of chemical reactions thats lile a biological programming in a way. It's a "what is sentience really" philosophical sort of question with no definite answer. Can a machine that's complicated enough be considered sentient? I would say no but its a debated thing.
@namedidii5 жыл бұрын
proper computer science is not the making of a "smart" movie lmao