Examples 25-28 of the New World Translation Being Doctored

[@itsMe-ey2lv]

This is one aspect of Lloyd's channel we Christians love! 👏🏽👍🏽

[@sifrade]

The Interlinear NT is the only JW book I did not destroy. I found it (it was my mother's) when I was 13, fell in love and decided to learn Ancient Greek, which I did, but let's say it backfire a bit and studying classics was instrumental in my awakening from the organization.

[@AnArchyRulzz]

Perfect example of why JW organization fears education

[@b4ph0m3tdk9]

This series is so very important, thanks for facilitating this work.

[@TruthSpeaker.]

Woohoo!!! One of my favorite series on this channel, & you finally made a new one!!! Thanks Lloyd

[@jimmyb3158]

I think you need to look into Titus 2:13. One of the most glaring examples of a doctored scripture. It may be that they even doctored their own Interlinear version because it doesnt line up with any other Interlinear version.

[@jjmillen]

Holy crap I just looked it up, that’s a big one as well. Very good find, hope it gets included 👌🏻

[@DAVIDEMARTELLO]

Love this series ❤

[@erinkeneston7702]

Hi Lloyd. These are my favorite videos of yours

[@joannaalabaster5916]

Great job as always! Thanks Lloyd!

[@philipblack5176]

Thank you, Lloyd. I have really liked this series. How to change the word of God to the words of 8, no sorry, I mean 10, oops sorry...it's now 9 men!

[@oshiforb7445]

I was doing a wooden project at home. I put my coat on, and my wife said, "Where are you going?" and "What are you going for? " I told her,"I gofor wood. " I know it's spelt slightly different, but maybe God was telling Noah to gofor wood. 🤔😜

[@KitKatSukiKat]

Thank you Lloyd. One of my favourite series ❤

[@lilymohsye]

This is a most interesting series! I look forward to more!

[@StefWokeUp]

Thank you for this. I always enjoy this series.

[@tonymorris4325]

Hi Lloyd,Ezra 2:69 WT snicked the word 'project' in relation to the donations for the construction of the temple. Many bibles translate work and not project

[@luan.assis2020]

Have you already apostatized, Tony? 😅

[@tonymorris4325]

@@luan.assis2020 long time ago !!!

[@b4ph0m3tdk9]

Aaand whiskey in the jar..

[@diegobrito6735]

The resinous wood request always makes me think of the Knights who say Ni requesting a shruberry. One that looks nice. And not too expensive.

[@jakeleroy3186]

I looked up gopher wood and found that it most likely was refering to teak wood as it was available and used for building in the middle east. Whether or not thats ehat the NWT was referring to I dont know.

[@PlayerClarinet]

Gen 6:14 in the Good News version simply reads "good" timber. I wonder why the other translations allude to something like unobtainium.

[@theunb7035]

NRSV footnote on Gen 6:14 - Meaning of Hebrew uncertain. Nobody knows what the wood used to make the ark is supposed to be. Resinous wood is as good as any description, maybe better than putting a specific wood type in there. i will have to research if such a thing exists though. NRSV uses Cypress in the main text.

[@belladonna70]

they completly re wrote the bible didnt they...... when i left the cult i said to the presiding overseer, that latest bible the silver sword,,its re written the bible..its disgusting . he did not disagree.

[@ronburg8544]

I noticed Lloyd doesn't include the NRSV in his translations. I looked on bible hub and it seems like they don't use it? Does anyone know why? Thanks :)

[@tankc3495]

Hey Loyd , would like to tell you my story about JW. I've tried getting it out many times but I'm severely mentally ill and no access to health care to treat so I can't get enough focus to communicate well enough to tell it.

[@b.w.7588]

Tank C, I'm sorry to hear that. I hope that at some point you can get access to the help you need.

[@tankc3495]

@@b.w.7588 thanks, soon as I can get my benefits out of JW hands I can turn my insurance back on so hopefully Loyd keeps up great job 🍺

[@jjmillen]

Very sorry to hear that, being mentally ill is still so undervalued in so many places. As well as receiving benefits, and it sucks. I’m in a similar situation with my wife, and the bOrg has definitely had its effect on her mental health as well. I really wish you well and I hope you can still receive your benefits somehow.

[@Narcissism_101]

Thank you for this review of the Revised NWT. Two things I wanted to point out. The previous version of the NWT, now known as the reference Bible is also quite different from the current 2013 revision. I find this very disturbing. When you are pointing out discrepancies, can you please indicate these changes as well? I believe the previous version was much more carful with the wording. The second point: For your next segment of “Doctored” could you do a search on the 18 occurrences where the 2013 revision has used the word procedure to doctor the text for organizational purposes. This was not done in the previous version. The current leadership has gone far beyond what our previous generation was taught. Thank you for considering these points.

[@ashleyandspencer8033]

One of our favourite series!

[@byronstander5210]

Hi Lloyd, I found an interesting one in 2 Kings 3: 26 - 27 Not sure if this has already been covered, please ignore if it has. Most translations render it as wrath or anger, but NWT renders it indignation which feels a bit toned down. Thanks for all the hard work you put into your videos.

[@finnguy9096]

My suggestion is Numbers 31:18. Here the 2013 revision left out "for yourselves", which was in the previous version of NWT. This seems to be trying to soften the horrible sex slave narrative of this hideous chapter.

[@JazmineTaglienti-yi8tt]

That was interesting what you mentioned about resinous wood. I had a look on google though and once researched does make a lot of sense. Incase anyone is interested, resinous wood belongs to the family of coniferous tress including pine, cedar, spruce and more. It is one of the best materials for construction due to their low density making it easier to work with. This would have helped the ark in floating rather than using heavier and denser wood. It also withstands water the best( which there would’ve been a lot of). Also imagine the sheer amount of wood it would have taken to build the ark. Maybe asking for resinous wood allowed different types of the wood in that family to be used ensuring there was enough instead of specifically asking for one type which would have been a lot harder to make sure there was enough. Asking for specifically one type of wood to be used would have made Noah’s work way harder if not impossible. This was all done by hand no equipment to transport that type of tree from other areas. I thought that was interesting and wanted to share 😊

[@deus_vult8111]

Humans could never be sacrificed. People devoted doesn’t mean sacrificed

[@debkopinsky8438]

Thanks!

[@LloydEvans]

Thanks for the kind support Deb!

[@stealthy1086]

@16:58 Philippians 2:6 would have read a bit different when you were a JW, and it would have included a similar word to ‘cling’ or ‘grasp’. It wouldn’t have been as quite slam dunk as you say!

[@aidellamas5542]

i'ts so sad how many persons are manipulated with a book, that contradicts it's self...

[@daveyravage]

I know you’ve already done Jephthah’s daughter but compare Judges 11:35 in the NWT to other translations

[@AlanDaubs]

Luke 9:56. Should read ‘For the Son of man is not come to destroy men's lives, but to save them. And they went to another village.’ NWT reads ‘So they went to a different village’.

[@tiadiad]

"The internets speaketh the truths." - 3rd Timothy, chapter 5 verse 11

[@90zuk4]

So, I’ve been doing this myself. I saw you’ve got John 8:58 from my list, but here’s a few I didn’t see. Colossians 1:6 I love this one, they add the word other for absolutely no Greek reason. It’s completely an additional word not found in the interlinear, not even the kingdom interlinear. Titus 2:13 the is added in the 1984 edition, and our is added in the 2013 addition. Changing the meaning of the verse to stray away from the godhead unity. Romans 9:5 is also a favorite because there is no added words. But punctuation which changes the way it’s perceived. It’s amazing. Check them out! God bless

[@songoku6919]

Have you checked out Mathew 5:3?

[@gabby4382]

Of coarse you have to '" go for wood '" , its not going to cut itself down , and come to you !

[@symone3113]

@ Gabby. 😂😂😂 yes that’s it….

[@lisettebordeleau3765]

Great work!

[@gidifihrer3966]

To be accurate Lloyd is incorrect on Genesis 6:14. The Hebrew says “עצי גפר״. Using Latin letters “Atzai Gopher”. The translations are using the same word as the Hebrew and are not actually providing a equivalent English word. Jastrow which is the gold standard English-Hebrew dictionary in Jewish circles (I have no idea about what is used in Christian circles) defines gopher as “a resinous tree”. He cites the Talmud as identifying it as a species of ceder. In this case the JW’s are likely more correct

[@LloydEvans]

That’s like saying “a small green alien” when the original text says “Grogu.” Replacing a noun with a definition to make it read better is altering the text.

[@rosskstar]

Hi Lloyd, would you happen to know exactly which day Robert Ciranko became President in 2014? There are exact dates for everyone else but not him.

[@durakbalbesov9788]

Ephesians 4:24 - They changed "holiness" to "loyalty" in the NWT.

[@saburgess2336]

Hebrews 1:6 1961 NWT says: "let all God’s angels worship him" of Jesus, but they changed it to "obeisance"

[@cooperjackson4348]

Hi Lloyd!!!

[@finnguy9096]

Gopher is just a transliteration of the Hebrew word. I don't think there's anything insidious about it, it's just one of those words in Hebrew we don't know the meaning of. It could be cypress. It is close to the word kopher, 'tar', which is probably the association WT was going for. They do use a transliterated word when describing the window thing in earlier revisions, so I guess they could have used it here. Perhaps fudging away the fact that we clearly don't know all of Hebrew is their problem here. This is all in the Insight book, so it's surprising Lloyd didn't address it. Nothing to do with gophers. But the Bible having been written in a language that we can't ever fully decipher is another concern though, since it sort of goes against the whole divine authorship, doesn't it.

[@LloydEvans]

I didn’t suggest it had anything to do with actual gophers, but yes, why would a God who wants to communicate clearly with his creation choose a word that can’t be understood by the overwhelming majority of readers?

[@finnguy9096]

@@LloydEvans Thank you for reading my comment. I might've misread you, I'm sorry. But yeah, the other thing I have thought about since fading away and studying history more closely, is how the Mesopotamians had a near perfect way of preserving documents on clay tablets. We have thousands of originals in Akkadian but none in Hebrew. Kinda makes you wonder why He chose papyrus instead of clay for the most important book in the world 😉

[@pencilme1n]

Vise (a workshop tool, pronounced ‘vice’) arms - presumably the arms of a Vise or possibly strong arms.

[@EfrainRiveraJunior]

I'm not sure if this one has already been mentioned: 1 Samuel 14: 27

[@pearlytiger564]

I have one … John 1:1, “In the beginning was the Word, and the word was with God, and the Word was God.” NWT changes it to “and the word was a god.” Emphasis on the “a god” because they remove anything in the Bible that points to the Trinity. Well, ok, so we have more than one god now? Thought we had only one god. It makes ZERO sense.

[@symone3113]

@Pearly Tiger that one always got me like WTH!!

[@pearlytiger564]

@@symone3113 RIGHT!? I really don’t get how they can’t see the HUGE issue with this one. Hands down, this one, out of all the changes they made, this one will always be at the top of my WTF list.

[@JazmineTaglienti-yi8tt]

Hiya! I love researching things and just wanted to throw in an idea. So in history people had many gods in different religions. I believe witnesses believe that Jehovah is the true god. Although in the past, people would have had other gods they were not the true god. Many worshipped statues and idols that didn’t necessarily hold meaning. So there were many gods that people believed in but only one true God that proved He was real. Therefore stating ‘a god’ in the bible was simply speaking of these ones other people believed in, but not God, if that makes sense. Also the bible was inspired by god, so when it states that the word is ‘a god’ it also means divine because it came from him but is not Him. Not the one true God that they believed. Just throwing in an idea 😊

[@JazmineTaglienti-yi8tt]

Also one other point haha when it comes to the trinity. One thing I found spoke about how, if Jesus came down to the earth, and God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit are one, who was behind in heaven? In Matthew 3:17 it talks about when Jesus was baptised, a voice from heaven said, ‘this is my son, the beloved, whom I have approved’ so it makes you wonder who that was since Jesus wouldn’t approve and speak down to himself 😅 it was the words of a loving and proud father to his son

[@pearlytiger564]

@@JazmineTaglienti-yi8tt oh goodness ... heavens no. I don't think you understand that in this part of scripture when it states "the Word" that is referencing Jesus as well, because "the Word became flesh and dwelt among us." The JWs absolutely 100% believe that when scripture is referencing "The Word" here, it's talking about Jesus AND God depending on which part of the verse you are reading. But because the JWs do not believe in the Trinity, they added "a" to when it states the "the Word was God," and changed God to god, because they couldn't figure out another way to change scripture to make it fit their anti-trinity agenda. So from what you are saying above, is that JWs believe in multiple gods, which is absolutely not the case. That is why this change they made in scripture points out one of the biggest fallacies in their doctrinal beliefs. It just doesn't work and makes ZERO sense.

[@UtubeAdviser]

Oh snap I thought it was Eminem 😂😂😂

[@vanshankguitars]

Hey Lloyd!

[@aaronwood8012]

(Apostate wakes up from demonic possession stupor) “.....zzzzzz...... (snort) huh? Wha?? Oh! Yeah! Sure.... yeah.... let’s wreck the neighbors .... yeah ... the bastards .... that’s what we do .... yeah...(yawn)”

[@b4ph0m3tdk9]

Gensis 2:19 JW newest bible puts the creation of animals in past sentence, instead of in present, to fit the first creation story where animals was created first and then man. It says: "Now Jehovah God HAD BEEN forming from the ground every wild animal of the field and every flying creature of the heavens, and he began bringing them to the man to see what he would call each one" Older versions of JW bible and other bibles says: "Now Jehovah God WAS forming from the ground every wild beast of the field and every flying creature of the heavens, and he began bringing them to the man to see what he would call each one" Also this: Genesis 2:18 still talks about the creation of a helper for Adam is something that is going to happen, and then in 2:19 it happens, but no, not in the new JW bible there it has suddenly already happend, in the past. Makes no sense. When JW changed 2:19 to past sentense they should probably have changed 2:18 too, to fit.

[@sun.del.sol360]

Phillippians 2 is basically saying the idea that "Jesus is God" is a given, therefore he didn't have to steal or snatch or grasp or cling to it to aquire it, it was inherently his.

[@Caitgreenham]

Hello Loyd!

[@MrRockgod777]

gopherwood is known as cypress wood these days......

[@derekdunbar9636]

Special request: Lloyd could you please do a long in depth video of your journey to atheism? It’s the video I keep hoping you’ll do.

[@KevinRoseYT]

Regarding Philippians 2:5,6. Both the NWT and the others in Bible Hub are saying the same thing. The fact that the NWT doesn't have the word for grasping is irrelevant. They all give the same idea, that of Christ not trying to be equal to God. And that's the important thing. That the correct meaning is portrayed. If it was trying to say something different to the original Greek then you would have a good point, but it doesn't. Admittedly, some of the translations are confusing. King James seems to be saying the complete opposite to all the others.

[@minuette1752]

Yea, the whole Jesus being God thing always confused me and still does. That was one of things that sold me on JW's beliefs for a long time.

[@davidingram1892]

Clearly no matter what JWs do they are in the wrong! Since it is not certain what Gopher wood was, and Cypress wood is a resinous wood, a number of words would acceptably translate the original word. This is basic homework and does not demonstrate “doctoring”.

[@jaflenbond7854]

Arguments and debates are worthless and bring nothing... just face the TRUTH..... PROOF THAT THE LOVING, KIND, and MERCIFUL CREATOR WANTS HUMAN BEINGS TO LIVE and EXIST ON EARTH FOREVER The Creator's requirements for imperfect, suffering, and dying human beings - 1. submit to the authority of his Christ as his Chosen King and Ruler of the heavens and the earth 2. believe the teachings of the Christ about the "Kingdom of God" and "Resurrection of the Dead" REWARD - Eternal Life and existence on earth without sufferings, pains, griefs, sickness, and deaths. PROOF that LOWLY, KIND, and SUBMISSIVE HUMAN BEINGS WILL LIVE and EXIST ON EARTH FOREVER Jesus Christ knows that all lowly, kind, and submissive human beings who honor and obey him as their Heavenly Master and King and believe his teachings about the "Kingdom of God" and "Resurrection of the Dead" will be rewarded by the Creator with Eternal Life and existence on earth without sufferings, pains, griefs, sickness, and deaths The Creator knows that in his own right time, he will let his Christ resurrect back to life all lowly, kind, and submissive human beings who died even thousands of years ago like Abel, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, King David, the Christ's believers, and many others so they can live and exist again on a safe, secure, and peaceful earth as submissive and obedient citizens of the "Kingdom of God" and fully enjoy the eternal love, kindness, goodness, generosities, compassions, favors, and blessings of the Creator and his Christ for eternity under the loving and kind rulership, guidance, and protection of the Creator's Chosen King and Ruler of the heavens and the earth, his Christ. PROOF that ALL THE GREAT, SUPERIOR, and POWERFUL HUMAN BEINGS WILL NOT LIVE and LAST ON EARTH FOREVER The Creator knows that all the powerful, great, and superior Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Atheists, and Agnostics who are insulting and degrading his Christ as worthless and undeserving to be honored and respected as his Anointed King of the heavens and the earth and his teachings about the "Kingdom of God" and "Resurrection of the Dead" worthless and useless too are just bringing upon themselves their own disgrace, dishonor, downfall, shameful and Eternal Deaths, just worthless and useless dusts on earth forever.

[@Mobius81]

And thank you for the great content. This is the stuff JW's can't say you're lying about.. It's their own version of the bible, it's not like you're making this up.

[@saburgess2336]

I wonder if Philipians was saying that Jesus was already God, so he didn't need to reach to be equal to God, because he already was there. Does that make sense?

[@LloydEvans]

But isn’t that a bit superfluous? “The rabbit never strove to be a rabbit because it was already a rabbit.”

[@saburgess2336]

@@LloydEvans So that scripture makes no sense whatsoever. Regardless if you are a trinitarian or a non-trinitarian.

[@jasoncoupet5472]

Luke 22:19-20, NWT uses the word means, other translations use the word is

[@noahkling4018]

In my next book I’m using this Bible to show how much the Bible has deviated from the original messages.

[@oldchannel_MoM]

They deviate from the traditional bible because the watchtower wants to be seen as edgy, they wanna be the rockstars of christian theology

[@TruthHasSpoken]

Regarding Phil 2:5-6, one can read many early Christian commentaries on the verse. I do however like the clarity of Aquinas (Commentary on Phil.): _For it is through its form that a thing is said to be in a specific or generic nature; hence the form is called the nature of a thing. Consequently, to be in the form of God is to be in the nature of God. By this is understood that He is true God: [“That we may be in his true Son, Jesus Christ” (1 Jn. 5: 20) ]. However, it should not be supposed that the form of God is one thing and God himself another, because in simple and immaterial things, and especially in God, the form is the same as that whose form it is._ _But why does he say, in the form, rather than “in the nature”? Because this belongs to the proper names of the Son in three ways: for He is called the Son, the Word and the Image. Now the Son is the one begotten, and the end of begetting is the form. Therefore, to show the perfect Son of God he says, in the form, as though having the form of the Father perfectly. Similarly, a word is not perfect unless it leads to a knowledge of a thing’s nature; and so the Word of God is said to be in the form of God, because He has the entire nature of the Father. Finally, an image is not perfect, unless it has the form of that of which it is the image: “He reflects the glory of God and bears the very stamp of his nature” (Heb. 1:3)._ _But does He have it perfectly? Yes, because He did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped. This can be taken two ways: in one way, of His humanity. But this is not the way Paul understood it, because it would be heretical; for it would be a grasping [robbery] if it referred to his humanity. Therefore, it must be explained in another way, namely, of His divinity, according to which equality with God is said of Christ. It is contrary to reason to say otherwise: because the nature of God cannot be received in matter; but the fact that someone existing in a certain nature participates in that nature to a greater or lesser degree is due to the matter; which is not the case here. Therefore, we must say that He did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, because He is in the form of God and knows His own nature well. And because He knows this, it is stated in John (5: 18): “He called God his Father, making himself equal with God.” But this is not a grasping, as it was when the devil and man wished to be equal to Him: “I will make myself like the Most High” (Is. 14:1 4); “You will be like God” (Gen. 3:5), for which Christ came to make satisfaction: “What I did not steal must I now restore?” (Ps. 69:4). Then when he says, but emptied himself, he commends Christ’s humility: first, as to the mystery of the incarnation; secondly, as to the mystery of the passion (2:8). In regard to the first: first, he mentions His humility; secondly, its manner and form (2:7)._

[@mmltpb14]

Zechariah 12:10

[@chadmaltez-nt4td]

His new hair do yells “mid life crisis”

[@timisa58]

16:30. Crazy verse. Jesus didn't want to take advantage of his godly attributes????! Just doesn't make sense. It sounds like, once again, something made up by human beings.

[@Hammface]

I do love the new look Mr Lloyd, although you’re most handsome face/head gets lost on the white wallpaper 😂

[@blackops123999]

Regarding Philippians, jesus would not think he was god because it refers to jesus in the flesh. He was a man

[@doglover12345andfr]

Holy Shit! Your hair! (How long was I gone?!)

[@alans.wendelschafer6588]

Ezekiel 23:20. The swapped the word "emission" for "genitals." I would not have wanted to see Ezekiel's browsing history, jeez.

[@maklaren811]

28 examples? Wtf?????

[@woke2025]

You have to put this into a small book ... ..

[@JamesRichardWiley]

Noah's Ark required a seamless hull and bilge pumps to stay afloat. It had neither. God's fault.

[@b.w.7588]

In the BOOK OF PHILIPPIANS 2:5-6. I don't know that is an addition or if that is a result of later scribes inserting their Trinitarian beliefs into the text, but I don't that passage has anything to do with the Trinity. It sounds to me like it could be saying that Jesus has a divine sort of nature, but that he doesn't use that as a bragging point to try and say that he is equal to God. Really, these alleged words are supposed to be coming from a man who claimed to be speak on behalf of God, one who said that no one cannot come to God without acknowledging his authority as God's only then-spokesperson. Sometimes it hard to tell the difference with see self-proclaimed messiahs and prophets, and Jesus was only one out of multiple people who have done this throughout religious history. The historical Jesus was a bizarre, sincere man. Harmless and likely well-meaning but still, what bizarre little dude. Now, I'm an atheist and though I think the earliest Christians were nontrinitarian, I don't care if individual Christians in today's world believe in Trinitarianism or nontrinitarian theology. I have no reason to believe in either concept. To me, it's utterly irrelevant. I think it's always interesting to compare translations of the Bible. But you know, even if the Bible was "God's Word", I still would find many concepts and rules to be wrong and harmful and would not follow them, no matter what punishment I might be given for choosing not to adhere to said rules or concepts.

[@Lovealwayswins1]

Looking good Marshall Mathers

[@garryiglesias4074]

Hi John Gopher !

[@BardofHorror36]

Gopher wood, was prevalently used as a structural material in the Middle East. The different wood types were soaked in fresh water and salt water for one year. It still is used today.

[@LloydEvans]

A quick copy paste using "prevalently used as a structural material in the Middle East" shows your comment to be an extremely disingenuous misquote of a creationist source. Please don't abuse my comments section to spread misinformation or you will be blocked.

[@TheRealMGT]

A quick Google search for gopher wood will show that is does exist. I have no idea why Lloyd is saying there's no such thing as gopher wood.

[@Deo_on2]

Squirrel screws 🤣🤣🤣

[@Lovealwayswins1]

109 subs dude

[@AlanDaubs]

Psalm 119:138. Faithfulness changed to reliable. Noticed in WT w23 Jan. par 13 proof that the bible is trustworthy.

[@gregnietsky]

Noah and his sons going Al over gofer Wood here and gofer wood there

[@vincentcross9148]

Like the hair bruh!

[@EviLxFifi]

Squirrel screws XD

[@treboy63]

Are you going to the protest Lloyd on 🎃 👻

[@myidahohomestead.7123]

Its kind of off subject, but Joseph Smith has what's called Joseph Smith translations. He started doing his own "corrections" and translations of the Bible to what he thought it should be. That's the mormon excuse. They only believe the Bible as far as it is translated correctly. So anytime there is an issue with it and the book of mormon they say the Bible wasn't translated right.

[@letadoro8966]

It was the custom, evidently to offer people in sacrifice, both for Yahweh and for other elohim such as Chemos god of the Moabites. Episode in 2 kings 3:27 mesha king of moab burns his firstborn to save his skin. Analogy with yahweh elohim of the Israelites, where, in exchange for help in the battle against the Ammonites, he offers him the first person who came to meet him as a burnt offering, unfortunately it was his daughter. Or also the episode of Isaac where "god" then spares him . This was the god of love.

[@archivalblob56]

There's also an interesting possibility that Isac was actually sacrificed in the "original" version of that story and that this was then amended later on as the tradition was transmitted

[@saffronhammer7714]

Words written by men, later teamster ahd. Interpreted by other men: . But I’m supposed to care?

[@mrm8850]

any bible is a bible not the bible! as much as i agree with the bible the message is clear as much as mankind has altered it! make sense to me! there is truth to it!

[@jaflenbond7854]

The CREATOR is the Most High and Sovereign God who authorized and sent Jesus Christ from heaven to earth to preach and teach the "Kingdom of God" and "Resurrection of the Dead" to imperfect, suffering, and dying human beings. The KINGDOM of GOD The "Kingdom of God" is the Creator's Rulership through Jesus Christ that will destroy and put an end to all the Satanic arrogance, lies, deceptions, hypocrisies, and cruelties of Satan the Devil's Atheism, Agnosticism, and Religious Fanaticism and ensures planet earth is secure, safe, and peaceful for all lowly, kind, and submissive human beings who will be allowed by the Creator to live and exist on earth forever without sufferings, pains, griefs, sickness, and deaths as their honor and reward for being submissive and obedient to the authorities, teachings, and commandments of the Creator and His Christ. The RESURRECTION of the DEAD The "Resurrection of the Dead" is the Creator's guarantee that all lowly, kind, and submissive human beings who died even thousands of years ago like Abel, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, King David, the Christ's believers, and many others will not remain as worthless dusts on earth forever, instead in his own right time, the Creator will let Jesus Christ resurrect them back to life so they can live and exist again on a safe, secure, and peaceful earth as submissive and obedient citizens of the "Kingdom of God" and fully enjoy the eternal love, kindness, goodness, generosities, compassions, favors, and blessings of the Creator and his Christ for eternity under the loving and kind rulership, guidance, and protection of the Creator's Chosen King and Ruler of the heavens and the earth, his Christ.

[@mrm8850]

@@jaflenbond7854 well if you follow the watchtower all the best!

[@jaflenbond7854]

@@mrm8850 hahahahaha.....Satan the Devil's Atheism, Agnosticism, and Religious Fanaticism VS. the authorities, teachings, and commandments of the Creator and his Christ....and you're talking about the Watchtower? Really? ....hahahahaha..... The Creator is the loving, kind, and merciful God and Father of Jesus Christ Jesus Christ is the One given by the Creator all authority in heaven and in earth The teachings of the Christ are - 1. the Kingdom of God 2. Resurrection of the Dead Christians, Buddhists, Muslims, Hindus, all Religions, Atheists, and Agnostics - 1. don't honor and respect the Creator as the Most High and Sovereign God 2. don't submit to the authority of Jesus Christ as the Creator's Chosen King and Ruler of the heavens and the earth 3. reject the teachings of the Christ about the Kingdom of God and Resurrection of the Dead as worthless and useless, no value whatsoever in their own lives and existence

[@mrm8850]

@@jaflenbond7854 trash talk!

[@jaflenbond7854]

@@mrm8850 Nothing has changed.... Atheists can worship and glorify Satan as better, greater, higher, powerful, and superior than the Creator.. Liars and deceivers can degrade the Bible as just a book of lies, myths, fictions, fantasies, and fairy tales But just the same.. Satan the Devil is still the Father of Lies and Murderer of Human beings Satan the Devil is still the enemy of the Creator Satan the Devil is still misleading and deceiving human beings to hate and slander the Creator and reject too the authority and teachings of the Christ about the "Kingdom of God" and "Resurrection of the Dead" Atheists, Agnostics, Cults and religions are still worshippers of Satan and believers of the lies and false teachings of his anti-Christs. The Creator and his Christ are opposed and against the Satanic arrogance, lies, deceptions, hypocrisies, and cruelties of Satan's Religious Fanaticism, Atheism, and Agnosticism Atheists, Agnostics, Cults and religions are opposed and against the authorities, teachings, and commandments of the Creator and his Christ It's the same battle to the death - The Creator and his Christ VS Satan the the Devil, Religions, Atheists, and Agnostics ETERNAL DEATHS for RELIGIONS and CULTS The Creator knows that Christians, Catholics, JWs, Mormons, Buddhists, Hindus, Muslims, Baptists, Pentecostals, Born Agains, all Cults and Religions who worship the Father of Lies and believe the lies and false teachings of the liars and anti-Christs Pastors and Leaders of Cults and Religions about "Armageddon", "rapture", "hellfire", "Trinity", and "reincarnation" are worthless and useless human beings who are just bringing upon themselves their own sufferings, sickness, disgrace, dishonor, downfall, shameful and Eternal Deaths, just worthless and useless dusts on earth forever. WORTHLESS and USELESS LIVES and EXISTENCE of CULTS, RELIGIONS, ATHEISTS, and AGNOSTICS on PLANET EARTH Cults and Religions, Christians, Buddhists, Muslims, Buddhists, Atheists, and Agnostics who freely and willingly placed themselves under the authority, power, and control of arrogant, cruel, and merciless Satan the Devil will just grow old, suffer, get sick, get weak and weaker, die and become worthless and useless dusts on earth forever as the consequence of their Satanic hatred, mockeries, opposition, and defiance of the Creator's Sovereignty and his Christ's authority and teachings.