Expertise

Рет қаралды 3,928

Larken Rose

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 231

@cakins08 4 ай бұрын

You don't need to be an expert to understand the Earth is a stationary level plane.

@joshpollack5936 2 ай бұрын

Are you being serious or joking, I can’t tell lol

@redleo380 5 ай бұрын

Most experts are experts at regurgitating institutional lies.

@WizzdummHeadley 5 ай бұрын

EXACTLY!!! Just look at all the utter insanity/nonsense that we were told by so called "experts" during the "events" of 2020 onward!!!???

@honestlee4532 5 ай бұрын

When I hear "experts", I take that as a red flag.

@ekurisona663 5 ай бұрын

as reaction people have when they hear someone is an 'intellectual' - it's an immediate red flag because life and the universe don't work that way - everything is connected in some kind of way, so narrow field expertise must be integrated into a richer tapestry to make sense of the world around us - and we need to be able to use our natural abilities, senses, heuristics/intuition, experience, agency to navigate those waters... people bullying their way in with 'we're experts and intellectuals and authority' are just bulls in the china shop - i always wonder how they're seemingly so ignorant of how they are affecting people and situations and so confident in their myopia - it's really something

@Patrick-sg7cm 5 ай бұрын

@ekurisona663 Most of the "so called experts" could care less if they are wrong or telling deliberate lies as long as they receive a paycheck.

@RicaRoseHopeful_Voluntarist 5 ай бұрын

"He talked fancy to me!" ~ A Bug's Life

@Patrick-sg7cm 5 ай бұрын

We need to be careful about blindly trusting the experts. Often times, the experts are for sale and will say anything they are told to say for a paycheck.

@ericpellizzari4420 5 ай бұрын

I worked in a hospital for 10 years both as a contractor and an employee and i confirm this is very true. Especially the higher up you go..

@AMP3083official 5 ай бұрын

My favorite news headline: 'EXPERTS ARE BAFFLED!'

@LarkenRose 5 ай бұрын

Which usually means, "Professional Liars Running Out of Excuses!"

@AMP3083official 5 ай бұрын

@@LarkenRose 😅

@stevegregory7512 5 ай бұрын

Listening to this, there's one name that comes to mind: Neil DeGrasse Tyson. He sure sounds like he knows what he's talking about, but his conjob is all to obvious.

@keithbaker1951 5 ай бұрын

Like when he said the earth was 🍐 shaped 😂 yet all the cartoons and globes we have ever seen were perfect round spheres.

@davidj231 5 ай бұрын

@@keithbaker1951 The lies have to evolve as our abilities to perceive and think rationally grow.

@kennethstensrud214 5 ай бұрын

EXACTLY 😅

@chuklee7523 5 ай бұрын

I had to stop at 3:40, I had an employee who could say anything with such a level of confidence that everybody believed him. Even when he was 100% wrong. It really pissed me off. There are times when he would argue with me, and I was right, and he would say what he was saying was such confidence that people just automatically believed him. Drove me up the wall.

@bbblackwell 5 ай бұрын

The Trump factor.

@garyrolen8764 5 ай бұрын

Why didn't you just prove him wrong? You could have deflated him and re-earned the respect and trust of the others.

@LarkenRose 5 ай бұрын

@@garyrolen8764 The type of person he's talking about never admits that he is wrong. He wouldn't be deflated. He would continue on, as confident as ever. That describes every flat-earther, for example.

@jorionedwards 5 ай бұрын

@@garyrolen8764 I've tried using evidence. Doesn't always work when a high charisma charlatan enters the mix or when the audience doesn't care for truth. Once in school a substitute teacher claimed that Jesus never prescribed baptism (in a physics class). When I showed everyone in class the multiple verses that said otherwise, she spouted more nonsense to claim why the sinner prayer is biblical despite it not showing up in any version of the bible and used some classic appeal to authority. She got believed. I didn't.

@bbblackwell 5 ай бұрын

@@jorionedwards A good politician--public or private--knows how to move goalposts, strawman, appeal to authority, and ad hominem his way to acclaim in any situation. In other words, he wields well the ignorance his audience. There's nothing you could do but walk away lamenting the surreal circumstance of living through a zombie apocalypse. Have you ever read Boethius' "Consolation of Philosophy?"

@drumstick74 5 ай бұрын

You hit the nail on the head from 28:00 onwards. The majority of the medical profession were spineless liars, and people who were supposed to be rebels (like for instance musicians) did nothing, just followed along. Even the ones with "anti authority" media image like _Foo Fighters_ and _Rage Against The Machine_ required their audience to be jabbed. 😮‍💨 *Sigh!*

@bbblackwell 5 ай бұрын

They have too much to lose. This is why ridding ourselves of government won't be enough. As long as people can accumulate material wealth through methods of trade that rely on subjective valuations, there will be reward slavery, even if punishment slavery is abolished.

@tysonbiornstad2205 5 ай бұрын

Thinking is the most intolerable labor that people wish to avoid and delegate to someone else.

@1voluntaryist 5 ай бұрын

All my life I have had difficulty understanding people because I assumed they "thought" as I did. Finally, I came to realize that their cryptic remarks were not rational because they were bluffing, e.g., they were pretending to be thoughtful without doing any thinking at all.

@bbblackwell 5 ай бұрын

@@1voluntaryist Same here. I assumed if I could only explain myself, *surely* they would see reason. Then I realized they didn't care about actually being right, only justifying their own B.S.

@ryanhodgson1879 5 ай бұрын

I'd say it's taking personal responsibility for their thoughts emotions and actions, but fair fair. That does require thinking lmao

@jonas3333 5 ай бұрын

What's truly terrifying is how EASY it is to convince so many people to lie. It just doesn't seem to bother them to lie at all.

@1voluntaryist 5 ай бұрын

Sabine Hossenfelder did a great job of explaining Howard's mistakes. She's an astrophysicist.

@diogenes9295 5 ай бұрын

Yes, but she still thinks that CO² causes heat.

@travisthompson1679 5 ай бұрын

One of my pet peeves are the "debunking" "experts" who do a terrible job of "debunking". They just rely on appeals to authority, strawmans, and other fallacies. Or they are just lazy and don't bother actually showing you the evidence to back up their claims. It's really bad in archeology and v*ccine stuff. It's really hard to find people in these areas to actually learn anything from because everyone is just asserting things without ever explaining how they got there.

@olrailbird 5 ай бұрын

I think this is because experts are generally high in intellect, but low in intelligence. Intelligence requires wisdom.

@conradmbugua9098 3 ай бұрын

@@olrailbird Or they're paid to intentionally misinform the public

@robbinpapalucas4620 5 ай бұрын

The less I know allows me to be open to learning to know, what I don't know.🎉

@steverino5054 5 ай бұрын

"confidently spewing crap" - aka the political class.

@guillaumekeulen219 5 ай бұрын

Dont forget Lawyers, accountancy social workers, paperpushers in general

@cacaomonster 5 ай бұрын

I’ve spoken on this subject to people so many times Larken. Thank you for bringing it to light.

@Maibrapiano 5 ай бұрын

I know theory too, but weirdly I kind of learned it by accident by just playing and learning classical music by ear.

@tinnaz1 5 ай бұрын

Yes! This is one of the greatest truths they've ever taught us! Among the millions of others!

@Marmalade93 5 ай бұрын

Mr Rose, what a mind you have! Excellent work. Thank you

@AScannerClearly 5 ай бұрын

From my observations, bias & trust are central to people’s belief in one “expert” over another when you have two of them making contradictory claims. People (without base knowledge on a subject) always trust whichever one best matches their own biases, so even when the one they listen to is proven flat-out wrong, as long as the wrong “expert” never confesses, but provides literally ANY excuse for how he is “actually” still correct somehow, their ignorant followers will remain convinced.

@travisthompson1679 5 ай бұрын

There's also the slow degradation of competency due to things like DEI making "experts" not actually know anything.

@froderik 5 ай бұрын

Good topic. I addressed it almost one year ago: 'I think most of us would agree that something is likely to be dangerous if all of the "experts agree" that it isn't.'. . . Yay me.

@msspacecake121 5 ай бұрын

Aye Larken 🙏i too am happy my mum and dad are not here to see the stupidity...

@darrellernst5493 5 ай бұрын

Jack of all trades and a master of none. I know things on many topics but I am not an expert on any topics.

@bbblackwell 5 ай бұрын

The "Jack of All Trades" is master of one: Versatility.

@darrellernst5493 5 ай бұрын

@@bbblackwell people rarely truly know how to do anything until they have done it themselves.

@Mr.Grimsdale 5 ай бұрын

@@darrellernst5493 Most people don't challenge themselves to see if they can do something, unfortunately.

@Mr.Grimsdale 5 ай бұрын

I was a Set-Builder which meant i could construct things out of wood, wallpaper, paint, tile etc to a professional standard but i'm not an expert at anything.

@jeremiahbullfrog9288 5 ай бұрын

Finish the quote: "... is oftentimes better than a master of one"

@skullanones 5 ай бұрын

The earth isn't flat, it has hills, valleys, mountains, volcanoes, and a sea level. With that in mind the earth isn't a spinning ball either, it is stationary unfr the firmament.

@skullanones 5 ай бұрын

Under the firmament.

@LarkenRose 5 ай бұрын

You believe that, because you never learned the basics of geometry, physics, or logic. Then you heard something that SOUNDED persuasive (because you didn't have enough of the foundational knowledge to spot the bullshit), and then you WANTED to believe it. Meanwhile, the real world proves that to be 100% untrue. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jZy6fph_Ys-Wqsk

@nitsudocsicnarf347 5 ай бұрын

You need to be mocked daily.

@bbblackwell 5 ай бұрын

I look into space and everything is round. I'm going with a ball on the Earth thing.

@saywhat6768 5 ай бұрын

Bingo. The idea of a ball spinning over 1k/mph, orbiting the sun over 66k/mph and shooting through a universe at over 500k/mph is lunacy!!!

@astatine0085 5 ай бұрын

Dunning-Kruger effect.

@JekyllHyde967 5 ай бұрын

Idiocracy has become a documentary...

@mustardseedsociety 5 ай бұрын

The same exact thing happens in the freedom community concerning "chemtrails" because the vast majority has no clue how a modern day jet engine works. They look up in the sky and see contrails and just automatically conclude they are "chemtrails". Now look, I'm anti gov - my nick name is anti gov LOL {that was a joke} but seriously, many times the freedom movement is its own worst enemy for exactly the reasons Larken has pointed out. In the case of "chemtrails" as an example, right off the bat, we can eliminate the commercial airliners as the ones making "chemtrails". It is impossible for an airliner configured to carry passengers to be spraying "chemtrails" because {1} there's no "chemtrail" release switch in the cockpit and {2} there's no place to install the chemtrail tank. Yet the vast majority of higher altitude traffic is commercial jet airliners. So those lines in the sky are NOT 100% "chemtrails". If there are "chemtrails" at those altitudes, they would be a small % and they would be from special modified aircraft. So that's all I'm asking is at the very least, if you verify the airplane is a commercial jet airliner, then if it's leaving a trail, it's a CONTRAIL, not a "chemtrail". But what's so frustrating, is the same freedom people always look up and make false claims YET totally ignore ACTUAL real bona-fide CHEMTRAILS literally being sprayed from 50 feet off the ground by Crop dusters. The freedom people are putting their energy towards the unprovable while totally ignoring the provable. And the world LAUGHS at the freedom movement.

@diogenes9295 5 ай бұрын

Totally agree. The con-trail is a condensation trail, duh! 🙄There are a few known chemtrails; mostly cloudseeding to kick start rain. It makes me cringe to hear all the absurdity from otherwise sensible people. Other ClA psyops designed to ridicule all conspiracy theory are flerfing, 5G, the non-moon landing, numerology, and we are living in a simulation. And yet a majority of people believe in Big Pharma's shots, Big Ag's veganism, forever wars, CO² poison, EVs don't pollute, democracy, and good government. Go figure. However, a couple of serious realities that very few know about are currency/economic collapse, and the magnetic pole flip.

@sixstringhans-tone5574 5 ай бұрын

All I ever remember seeing as kid being born in the 70’s is planes that were way the hell up in the sky and the trail behind it would disappear not to far behind it all the time. Or it was a helicopter or a smaller plane that might have been a few thousand feet in the air that I didn’t see any kinda exhaust coming from it. I saw those things probably all the way up to maybe the 2010’s-ish…… So I can tell the difference between a chemtrail an a contrail. And like you sayin something about passenger airliners and people maybe thinking they are producing chemtrails just wouldn’t make sense to me any way cuz if passengers were on a plane spooing out chemicals would probably be instant death maybe to passengers, I would think anyway. ✌🏼

@mustardseedsociety 5 ай бұрын

@@sixstringhans-tone5574 Great points !! Thanks for the reply. If you go on YT and watch videos of the old B-707's and the old B-727's you'll see when they took off, {at max or near max power} you'll see they left black smoke coming from the tailpipe AND they were extremely LOUD. Today's modern jet engines are High Bypass Turbo Fan engines and when they take off at max or near max power, they leave no black smoke on takeoff. If they do leave smoke on take off, then there's a malfunction and that would most likely call for a return to land as soon as possible situation. So here's where the confusion comes in. When the jet of a modern high bypass engine reaches cruising altitude, because the engines are far more efficient than engines of the past, they are converting MORE of the energy from fuel into water. {pure hydrogen produces heat + water} A modern high bypass engine produces heat + some hydrocarbons + lots of water. The water comes out the exhaust as STEAM This steam is invisible UNTIL it mixes with the very cold DUCTED thrust fan air just aft of the tailpipe and that in turn mixes with ambient air, and if the temperature is about minus 52 Celsius and the relative humidity is in a certain range, the steam will turn to ice crystals and CAN produce a spectacular long and sometimes long lasting CONTRAIL. The key is the High Bypass DUCTED fan engine and the high water content in the exhaust thanks to efficiency. The REASON the high bypass engine is installed on modern day jet airliners is {1} they produce enormous amounts of power which means single engine performance is good enough even for high density altitude days {2} They are light years more fuel efficient than engines of the 50's and 60's and 70's.{3} They are much much quieter. The long contrails they produce under certain atmospheric conditions is PROOF that the engines are much better than the old engines. These modern engines are also more reliable. The ONLY negative I can think of with the high bypass turbofan engine, is they are more prone to sucking in birds through the engines. But you have 2 engines and the airplane can climb out at max weight on one engine - not as much as two engines, but within standards. That's where the rudder comes in - but that's for another day.

@katiekane5247 5 ай бұрын

Using the chemtrail term starts the obfuscation. Stratospheric aerosols are an actual thing.

@mustardseedsociety 5 ай бұрын

@@katiekane5247 You mean like CFC's from pressurized cans correct ?? Because those actually are problematic. {in theory anyways} But when you see trails coming from the tailpipe of a modern day high bypass fan jet engine at the higher flight levels, that's simply the water vapor in the exhaust mixing with the highly cold ducted thrust fan air and hitting a very cold ambient atmosphere under certain relative humidity conditions. From the ground it looks like "smoke", but it's simply ice crystals - and YES they can linger. Just like the WW2 bombers did over Germany. Trust me, the pilots of the WW2 Bombers had they had any control over the matter, would have "elected" to NOT have contrails while flying bombing missions.

@joefization 5 ай бұрын

Everyone should study basic formal logic; what is a major premise, a minor premise and how to determine what conclusion they come to. The famous syllogism for example, "all men are mortal (major premise) and Socrates is a man (minor premise), therefore Socrates is mortal. (conclusion)" A different kind of syllogism could be something like "A new medicine has been released to the market without having been adequately tested for safety and efficacy (major premise) yet experts are claiming this medicine is safe and effective (minor premise), therefore these experts are failing in their duty of educating the public (conclusion).

@LarkenRose 5 ай бұрын

Yep, But your comment is already about twenty levels above how most people think (or feel, as the case may be).

@bbblackwell 5 ай бұрын

Also, their "duty" to educate the public, though assumed by their victims, was never actually part of their job description as tyrants and profiteers.

@joefization 5 ай бұрын

@@LarkenRose fair enough. I would like to recommend for anyone interested a very short book titled Being Logical for children and adults alike. Ancient Greece is famous for inventing democracy but I think their greatest invention was formal logic. It's our birthright to at least familiarize ourselves with it. One of my favorite videos of yours is titled It's Simple. It's the best logical deduction of the immorality of government I've ever heard and I recommend it to lots of people. Thank you for making it!

@olrailbird 5 ай бұрын

Everyone knows man is a featherless biped.

@johnliberty3647 5 ай бұрын

Experts on TV are propagandists. I started limiting complexities in my life and the dependencies on experts disappeared. I thought I was an expert on dropping trees after clearing land in a windless environment. I discovered after moving that I was very novice.

@danielrobbins6355 Ай бұрын

And then there are these scientismists who PRESUME that people "don't know anything about physics"... I KNOW HOW IT FEELS when I am being whipped around in a circle and I AM NOT FEELING THAT RIGHT NOW! And all this comparing apples and oranges and talking about riding on a train in a STRAIGHT LINE and not feeling it are: a) Comparing apples and oranges and b) Not even true! Yes you DO feel the movement on a train even if that is in a straight line! RIDE ONE!

@katiekane5247 5 ай бұрын

Some of the best in many fields are self taught, like Joey Santoro and botany. Institutional education tends to stifle thought in favor of accepting a proscribed narrative. As a female who knows something about cars, I've been gaslit more than once. As someone who went to nursing school and decided not to stay in practice, I've been "fired" as a patient for being too informed. Some professions are less tolerant of being questioned. Even those with average intellect can learn basic anatomy and physiology. I highly suggest it.

@Destro7000 Ай бұрын

A lot of what you're describing is a core plot point of The War Of The Worlds novel. The humans know the Martians are just massively evolved versions of themselves made out of pure brain, but they can't fathom or forget to appreciate that the Martians are playing 5D chess with them at all times and that they know more things than can even be in a human mind's frame of reference.

@ekurisona663 5 ай бұрын

great topic, larken - expertise can still be limited in how it integrates with all the other topics and subjects in the world which leads to the 'appeal to authority' fallacy or the 'if all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail' problem. for example, a surgeon whose life suffers in all domains outside of his practice. all of this supporting the idea that specilization by definition isn't good beyond a certain point because the specialist becomes out of phase or harmony or balance with the other aspects and domains of their environment and life.

@LarkenRose 5 ай бұрын

There's also the weird thing where people decide that if someone has a Ph.D., then he must magically be an expert in everything, and everything he says should be taken on faith.

@diogenes9295 5 ай бұрын

A surgeon's gonna recommend cutting, regardless.

@saisofttevault4548 5 ай бұрын

Well, here's proof-positive that the earth is NOT flat: If the earth were flat, cats would have knocked everything off by now. (I'm not an expert astronomer, but I've had a lot of experience with cats.)

@bbblackwell 5 ай бұрын

An argument from first-hand experience--that alone puts it way ahead of the pack.

@katiekane5247 5 ай бұрын

Not to mention every other celestial body of any size we can see are spherical.

@conradmbugua9098 3 ай бұрын

@@katiekane5247 So if a light bulb is spherical then the floor of a house must also be spherical is what you're basically concluding.

@mpscorporation6874 5 ай бұрын

Wait, wait, wait... did Terrance Howard actually declare that 1×1=2?

@LarkenRose 5 ай бұрын

Yes. He actually did. And not as some abstract, theoretical thing, but as a literal statement. Repeatedly. "This is the last century that our children will ever have been taught that one times one is one. They won't have to grow up in ignorance. Twenty years from now, they'll know that one times one equals two." - Terrence Howard

@bbblackwell 5 ай бұрын

Jeez, man... Pulling straight from the Big Brother playbook? This Howard dude is whack.

@davidj231 5 ай бұрын

@@bbblackwell He appears to be Neil the Grass-fed's replacement because too many people are waking up to Neil's woke BS. Just another charlatan on the world stage, testing the level of discernment of the masses.

@mpscorporation6874 5 ай бұрын

@@LarkenRose howwwwwww the hell did he "prove" his foolishness? 1 times 1 is the number 1 one time. One 1 is simply 1. And presumably educated people with college degrees ACCEPTED his foolishness? Unreal! 🤦🏾‍♂️

@tkoll6268 5 ай бұрын

I left school years ago because this foolishness lol.. rule number one OBEY!

@deborahsavageshaffer6846 5 ай бұрын

So to sum this rant up in my own limited way: You are speaking about those who express themselves sophomorically. I was in my early 20's when I started observing myself talking sophomorically. I would think it's driven by a strong desire to be right about the subject at hand. Not everyone is sophomoric because of evil intentions.

@Dougrutter1 5 ай бұрын

I do hope you don’t take this the wrong way… You are Frodo.. Height has nothing to do with this statement. How you deal with the ring of power is your own business. However you have a supernatural ability to explain the weakness of ego over the soul. So I thank you for your insights… 😎

@jorionedwards 5 ай бұрын

On one hand it's easy to call people cowards when you're not the one under fire. On the other hand, I wouldn't have been expelled during school if the guidance counselor (aka the mental health expert) did their jobs and explained what Hyperacusis was to the teachers that insisted on using loud group activities in lessons.

@philipgrobler7253 5 ай бұрын

Larken, where can I get to hear your music, I just got a hint a while back on how good you are, I really would like to hear more!

@jeremiahbullfrog9288 5 ай бұрын

You could watch The Jones Plantation, he did the whole score

@darrellernst5493 5 ай бұрын

A few years ago I had a lady Facebook friend who did what most people do and share information or post videos. She was calling herself a journalist. Okay journalist actually write things and their writings normally get published somewhere. Then the woman took a two week course on regressive hypnosis and started calling herself a therapist.😂 I told her about herself and that ended the friendship.😂🤣😂 A two week course isn't enough training to go messing with people's subconscious and could do harm.

@loydeallen6312 3 ай бұрын

The tree thing is cool. I've thought about it before, and I definitely thought further than just having a chainsaw. If I was to start without any experience, I'd be using ladders and ropes, chopping and lowering chunk by chunk. Just to try to make sure I didn't destroy anything other than the tree. Is that a good start? Serious question.

@bdog111 5 ай бұрын

Lions and tigers and manipulated statistics OH MY!

@danielrobbins6355 Ай бұрын

No! People who have WOKEN UP to the OBVIOUS FALLACY of the GLOBE can AND DO understand that THE EARTH IS FLAT! Think about it MORE! REALLY think about it!

@heaveniscoolerthanfire1204 5 ай бұрын

I am not an expert probably in anything, but I do know that there is truth, and the actual truth will set you free indeed; and that truth is that Christ is real. I cried out for the answer in my most desperate time 23 or 24 years ago. You should try it too, open your mind.

@1voluntaryist 5 ай бұрын

Watching "Wheel of Fortune" I learned that most people don't plan, don't think, e.g., don't question. I got so I could spot the ones who did come with a strategy, paid attention, by the look on their face. I could predict they were more likely to win. I lost interest when the worst players sometimes won. I don't like to see "pink panther" idiots come out on top of others.

@bbblackwell 5 ай бұрын

I don't understand the usage of the term "pink panther" here. Would you explain?

@1voluntaryist 5 ай бұрын

@@bbblackwell A comedy franchaise that feachered an inept inspector Clouseau who does everything wrong, but always prevails.

@bbblackwell 5 ай бұрын

@@1voluntaryist Oh yes, of course, I remember; but I was young and thought the panther was suave and capable, so I misunderstood the reference. I didn't recall the nuance of the inspector being inept and succeeding.

@Peter-xi1if 5 ай бұрын

Excellent - Subscribed! Thank you

@chrisscott3349 5 ай бұрын

Wake up America

@msspacecake121 5 ай бұрын

You make common sense look like it has been removed from most folks 🕊️❇️💚🙏 In lak'ech Don't have to be a brain surgeon to see the bullshit 😁

@jorionedwards 5 ай бұрын

Quick question: What do you mean by common sense? Nobody seems to agree what it is.

@diogenes9295 5 ай бұрын

Common sense is that which is most common. Like sharing; socialism. Or shots. Or paying taxes. Or jumping off a bridge when everyone else is jumping. Anarchism is uncommon.

@bbblackwell 5 ай бұрын

Show us tree stuff!

@craigf2696 5 ай бұрын

Expert; One who ex-cludes otherwise pert-inent information.

@tkoll6268 5 ай бұрын

Annuit Coeptis, Novus Ordo Seclorum.

@Mr.Grimsdale 5 ай бұрын

'Experts believe' how many people fall for that trick. un-named experts that have proven nothing.

@loydeallen6312 3 ай бұрын

Well shit. I may have just done this on FB? I gave a tiny spiel about voluntaryism, and that we have alot of people already not voting, so we could have it now.. Then I pointed them toward you, if anyone wants to hear it from someone that isn't me. I'm not an expert, but I'm also not completely ignorant about the idea. Right now, you're the expert I refer to.

@robertpike6934 5 ай бұрын

As usual, great video!

@TheyKnowWhoThisIs 5 ай бұрын

Spiken like a guy who wants to do his own research. GIVE ME A BRAKE, just get that poinson in you already! Its good for ya, Trust me, I am an Expert...

@katiekane5247 5 ай бұрын

What you don't know is how to spell.

@mkeyx82 5 ай бұрын

For some reason when you started talking about mechanics I immediately zoned out to "Rodney Dangerfield’s Guide to Auto Repair (1985)". But now I got my fix, please proceed.

@davidwilson9261 5 ай бұрын

Wow, I made a comment here and tried to link a video and it was taken down immediately.

@diogenes9295 5 ай бұрын

Non-YT videos are verboten.

@nin6246 5 ай бұрын

I agree that Terrence Howard is absolutely wrong about 1 x 1 = 2. That being said, I would leave it open on the shape of the earth. The radius value of the earth has been falsified so throwing out the entire topic of the flat earth would be a mistake.

@diogenes9295 5 ай бұрын

_"The radius value of the earth has been falsified."_ How so?

@LarkenRose 5 ай бұрын

If YOU don't know enough yet to know either way, then YOU continuing to consider things makes sense. But don't project your ignorance onto the rest of the world, and assume that if YOU don't know it, then NO ONE can possibly know it. Some of us know how to prove it. It's not flat. And the radius hasn't been "falsified," despite whomever you heard claiming that. Over two THOUSAND years ago, a pretty accurate radius was calculated (by Eratosthenes), that has been confirmed (and made more precise) a million times over since then. Every day you have first-hand evidence that proves the world isn't flat, if you understand even basic geometry. If you want to UNDERSTAND, instead of just BELIEVING one way or the other, you could start with this very simple, obvious proof: kzbin.info/www/bejne/jZy6fph_Ys-Wqsk

@warphog23 5 ай бұрын

@@diogenes9295 Long distance photography/videography.

@diogenes9295 5 ай бұрын

@@warphog23 Somebody told you that and you believed them? Or are you making fun of nin?

@davidj231 5 ай бұрын

@@diogenes9295 Globe proponents have to invoke refraction to explain away the countless long distance observations that clearly show the Earth to be either flat or hundreds of thousands of times larger than a 24,901 mile circumference globe. Just like they have to invoke "gravity" to explain how the alleged boundary between a gaseous gradient and the void of "space" works. Neither claim holds up but an apathetic lack of discernment keeps the lie going.

@garyrolen8764 5 ай бұрын

Seems you're talking about the appeal to authority fallacy. As far as I can tell, there's 3 types. One is the authority figure with all the terminology, perhaps a true expert, who happens to be wrong for some reason. One is the expert in one field being wrong on a subject they are not an expert. The last, is wrongly dismissing the layman simply because he isn't an expert. The example I use is a teacher discussing a financial question with colleagues, who consider the value of the advice of the superintendent vs the janitor.

@LarkenRose 5 ай бұрын

There's also actual "experts" who know better, but who intentionally LIE. (That might be a subset of the first one you listed.)

@garyrolen8764 5 ай бұрын

@LarkenRose yes. Reasons being the key word.

@olrailbird 5 ай бұрын

Depends on the financial question. Both have correct answers under some circumstances. One might argue even for the janitor, who may be financially rising faster than the administrator fat in his job.

@garyrolen8764 5 ай бұрын

@olrailbird exactly. The key word in what you said is "depends". Because it does. Which is why the appeal to authority fallacy is so detrimental. When people automatically assume someone is right or wrong, because of a creditial or lack thereof, there isn't a true evaluation of the question and/or answer.

@supplanterjim 5 ай бұрын

The sum of all integers from 1 to infinity (1 + 2 + 3 + ⋯ + ∞) = -1/12. Lol.

@cactusscone 5 ай бұрын

I'd agree with you on almost everything...but I've been seeing Bobby Kennedy on a lot of podcasts etc and I'd love to to hear your prospectives on Kennedys whole running etc because I really dig the guy but I also agree that anyone who wants the thrown must be a psycho

@bbblackwell 5 ай бұрын

He's a super-cool dude, as far as statists go, but haven't you watched Larken's, "If You Were King?"

@cactusscone 5 ай бұрын

@@bbblackwell I have not

@CostaRicaNOW369 5 ай бұрын

Well ... tell us what quality you like best...is nit his OK on full term abortion...or maybe his rabid defense of the slaughter of women and children in Gaza...or maybe it is his excusing of the CIA for the murder of his family members.?

@scgenton 5 ай бұрын

@@cactusscone Watch his interview on Jimmy Dore about Israel. Incredibly dishonest. Like all politicians, they change their opinion based on who is financing them or who aligns with their own interests.. and as the commenter above mentioned, check out the video he suggests.

@PonziZombieKiller 5 ай бұрын

We is doomed... F it

@bbblackwell 5 ай бұрын

It ain't over 'til it's over.

@diogenes9295 5 ай бұрын

@@bbblackwell Not gonna bet the farm on it.

@bbblackwell 5 ай бұрын

@@diogenes9295 Intellectually, it doesn't look good; but there's a natural corrective force and a resilient lifeward tendency underlying all of this, which I suspect cannot be squelched by mere human ignorance.

@diogenes9295 5 ай бұрын

@@bbblackwell Yes but that effect only comes after a lot more pain than we have experienced so far.

@bbblackwell 5 ай бұрын

@@diogenes9295 That's true, and if we admit spirituality into the conversation, the aforementioned acknowledgement doesn't preclude the extinction of this species en route to a higher expression in another form, even on another planet, etc. I still find that hopeful, but many wouldn't Hahaha

@elliottjames671 5 ай бұрын

I believe Terrance Howard is change the world

@LarkenRose 5 ай бұрын

By making it even more ignorant than it already is?

@unvaccinatedamerican9620 5 ай бұрын

27:48 forward 🎯🎯🎯

@jjemsnd7 5 ай бұрын

Didn't know you were a musician

@LarkenRose 5 ай бұрын

It's something I wish I had more time for. Maybe some day. kzbin.info/www/bejne/hGHElWelgpyJeKc

@traceeburris511 5 ай бұрын

Cool.

@scottmatznick3140 5 ай бұрын

2:53 so like you saying people saying the earth is flat at dumb?

@davidj231 5 ай бұрын

He's at least implying it and throwing around words like "flerf". Which is why I unsubbed - I don't care if people want to continue to believe in Santa/Easter Bunny/Globe but when they go out of their way to insult others based solely upon contradictory beliefs, they've demonstrated that they're operating at the emotional level. His other comments demonstrate that he has a profound lack of understanding of both logical fallacies and the very model that he purports to defend.

@DavidLawrenceDaley 5 ай бұрын

Wow your audio is great

@bobbyc5922 5 ай бұрын

Stick to volunteerism man. I don't watch you for your belief in the shape of the earth. I disagree with you on that, but I look past it because that is not why I listen to you. You are very authoritarian/religious on the topic. "Believe the experts" who wrote in a book, and do not question it because they are experts...Sounds a lot like preaching the Bible

@pyriticbatman88 5 ай бұрын

Genuinely curious, what is your evidence for a flat earth?

@nitsudocsicnarf347 5 ай бұрын

Lashing out in ignorance much.

@LarkenRose 5 ай бұрын

""Believe the experts" who wrote in a book, and do not question it because they are experts..." Your comprehension skills suck. And that's not surprising, if you think the Earth is flat. Not only did I not say or imply anything close to that. I said the exact opposite. Learn to LISTEN. Learn to OBSERVE. Learn to THINK. Until then, you'll just keep making an ass of yourself.

@LarkenRose 5 ай бұрын

By the way, the term isn't "volunteerism." It has nothing to do with volunteering.

@lucar.923 5 ай бұрын

Are you real? 😂🤪

@darrellernst5493 5 ай бұрын

Not relevant to the video but less than a week after Trump appealed to the libertarian party the governor of Wisconsin declared a State of Emergency for the Republican National Convention. 😂 Nothing says libertarian like deploying the National Guard.🤣😂🤣

@flatclub5098 4 ай бұрын

the more u mention flat earth, shows how little u understand physics etc. their is no place like outer space.

@plj4all869 5 ай бұрын

Hey Larken, In the end you kind of got to the main point but didn't stress it enough. There's a profit motive for car mechanics to lie about work "needed". There was a profit motive for the medical experts to lie. Same could be said for the scientists who get funding for their global warming research. But where's the profit in lying about astronomy or mathematics? Answer: there is none. And THAT is how you tell the difference.