Ok..buy Grifpen and F-16 the two half of them...Go...go...we need badly MRF fighters jet indeed to booster our air defense.. Mabuhay Philippines 🇵🇭👍👍💪
@PrayerWarriorPh4 ай бұрын
fifty pcs of FA-50.. thirty pcs of Gripen... 20 pcs of KF-21... We can consider manufacturing our own F-16s in the future, but right now we need aircrafts asap to meet the threat of China.
@pyxlxyles4 ай бұрын
The budget bro
@josephmariealba84836 ай бұрын
Gripen is more suitable to Philippines as an archipelago. The planes can easily be distributed all over the country.
@Ophirian-kt8ep6 ай бұрын
Go for Gripen😊
@educationcitystadiumclinic27096 ай бұрын
only in the philippines suffer budget constraints and defense but in terms of money and corrupt it's easy on their pocket, but i understand our government and military that our capability to aquire new technological weaponry must be upgraded and eradicate the corrupts in the government, I am confident to the latest administration that he will do his best to achieve the goals of the country (philippines) to boost the moral of our soldier, improve the economy and prevent unemployment in the country, prevent corruption, and utilizing the tax budget of the country for the filipino people etc.
@CoffeBuz6 ай бұрын
Philippines faces the same issues as the Thai Airforce. Either Gripen C/D or F-16 Block 50. (Though Thailand's situation is Gripen E vs. F-16 Block 70). It's a tough choice. Gripen make sense economically for small countries with less Defense budgets than United States. On the other hand, there's GEOPOLITICS at play. As for the Thai case, there's still 3 squadrons of old F-16's waiting to be decommissioned. SO who ever wins the first round ensures that they'll be selected for the entire 2 remaining squadrons. Fleet diversification is highly unlikely as it increases operational costs long term. Thai major point of tender is Offset policy. Probably the make or break point actually. The datalink is also the big issue. According to the Airforce's preliminary evaluation between F-16 block70 and Gripen E, 10 criteria points of comparison were used. With the Gripen E beating 9/10 total criteria. The Gripen has a better radar, Infrared sensors, more advanced avionics for the pilots, the ability to use METEOR, dispersed deployment on upcountry roads, cheaper to operate, 10min of turnaround with only 5 crew, Datalink and electronic warfare jamming suite all inside the airframe. In many ways, I think the public sentiment in Thailand feels the Gripen E is like the lower budget F35 that Thailand first wanted but was denied by USAF. Overall, I think the Airforce believes the Gripen E stands a better chance at survival in the battlefield than the F-16b70 despite having less aero-performance. As a system, it's a more complete choice. However, the biggest issue is the need for Earieye radar support aircraft to fly in a mission. This is a huge downside. Gripen E costs $85M, F-16b70 is $80M. But like I said, it's not a done deal. Because theres the OFFSET policy that each manufacturer still have to answer to. Soon. We will hear of that. Hope the Philippines decides what's best for Philippines. Combat readiness is the most important issue here. No point to have expensive jets when you can't afford to put them up in the air for training. You need the jets to fly so it's always ready to defend. The same issue is for Thailand. Eventhough the defense budget of Thailand is higher than the Philippines, the same issue exists nonetheless. Flight cost per hour is a Huge deciding factor.
@hernangatchalian59256 ай бұрын
Gripen E Jas39 are more wise choice and lower maintenance with advance sensor and more leathal weaponry that F16 are too expensive for the Phillippines.
@marukudo85326 ай бұрын
Good point. However, Gripen less cost to operate is far more better so that our pilots can train more.
@arminjoemarblanche19485 ай бұрын
Gripen is better for long term
@RossanoRuiz4 ай бұрын
The best choice for urgency's sake is 2nd-hand hand F16. Quick delivery and quick defense and at least 24 units for the country.
@TheDaysOfGlory4 ай бұрын
Second hand F-16s will not be new. Most likely coming from US National Guard airgroups… prolly F-16C Block 50/55… not the F-16V Viper with Sniper Pod. At least, 12 Gripen by next year.
@infinitechi35445 ай бұрын
The Philippine Government should support local manufacturers by assembling any fighter jets purchased or acquired overseas, whether F-16, F-15 -USA, Grippen -Sweden even SU-30 Russia-fighter jets?Philippine Executive,Philippine Senate and Philippines Congress needs to make a provision that procure, purchase jets needs to be assembled in the Philippines for Job creation and cost effectiveness in maintenance training and cost, two Jet engines at-least and one-two cockpit configuration. Peace
@infinitechi35445 ай бұрын
Forget that F-16 or Grippen buy a modern version of mig-29 with caveat that mig-29 (50) order will need to be manufactured in the Philippines with a transfer of technology as of now, Lockheed and SAAB will not transfer the technology of F-16 or Grippen even purchasing 60 fighter jets the USA also purchase mig-29, as an archipelagic country it requires a twin engine jet fighters with one and two seater configuration. The Philippine need to follow Taiwan they designed and built their own version of F-16. Peace
@EduardoObando-oh8thАй бұрын
Hanggang pangarap nalang .......
@timskigonzalo40746 ай бұрын
Better to buy them both
@rainnelmaclang48036 ай бұрын
F-16 is from a 1970s obsolescent design. It may have good performance now, but it can no longer take next generation weapons upgrades in the next ten to twenty years. Our potential opponents' new crop of fighters with new generation of missiles and sensors can outclass the F-16s now. We are better off looking at newly designed models like JAS-39, FA-50, HAL Tejas, etc... and future ones like KAI KF-21 Boramei and Saab-Boeing's fighter variant of the T-7 Red Hawk.
@danieltang16806 ай бұрын
I’d say the Eurofighter with the latest update is the optimal choice.
@byron86574 ай бұрын
Gripen low operational cost affordable systems and parts. The F16 high operational cost unaffordable systems and parts! Go go go Gripen Saab JAS 39 for the Philippines k!
@seekersoul34396 ай бұрын
Buy both.
@romeosanga61095 ай бұрын
Uninterrupted Supply chain is a vital factor to consider
@jay-nalbay79146 ай бұрын
Gripen less maintenance, can operate in rough runways can be refueled and re arm by only 5 person. Cheaper acquisition cost with enough sensors for quick react and detection. NATO operable.. There's no need for expensive f16. Philippines need more numbers of active jet not to pour in all the budget for few jet.
@johna31426 ай бұрын
Gripen E costs more than F-35 and F-16V
@benktlofgren47106 ай бұрын
@@johna3142 You can not only count for the acquisition, you need to count flight hours and maintenance for at least 10+ years. The F-16 will become more expensive in a year or two. The lower acquisition price is just for American salesmen bogus.
@spider-man9106 ай бұрын
Bit small for most countries , its almost the size of a lot of trainer aircraft .....
@johna31426 ай бұрын
@@benktlofgren4710 interesting case is Czech Republic’s new fighter jet selection recently.
@benktlofgren47106 ай бұрын
@@johna3142 well they going for F-35 it looks like, they have no border to Russia so makes sense in a way. That does not make an expensive old repainted F-16 a better choice. F-35 is not a question for the Philippines it's as expensive as a Gripen E but its maintenance, turnaround, and flight hours costs are insane. You need to sign mechanics service contracts with American firms and so on.
@memodelapena28906 ай бұрын
F15 EX 😊
@louilustrisimo81426 ай бұрын
Upgraded F-16 is also best for PH, or half n Half as well as for Griffin..❤️🇵🇭
@CzettCzarron6 ай бұрын
No doubt, the F16 is a very excellent fighter. However, the Gripen offers the best value-for-money as it has the lowest through-life cost (Program Unit Cost) and Operating Unit Cost. Hence, the Gripen is the more flexible aircraft to own and operate.
@luisitobanez76166 ай бұрын
Just to please the US, PAF should consider purchasing 1 Squadron of F16, the rest is Gripen EF variants or 2 Squadrons of FA 50's with upgraded version
@edwinsalindong49896 ай бұрын
Gripen-E ang pinaka-matindi sa lahat..Dun pa lang sa Cockpit na Flat Panel display ay malaking advantage na para maging madali ang trabaho ng Piloto..Kung pag usapan naman ang Sensor system ay lamang na lamang ang Gripen para ma-detect agad ang kalaban kahit malayo posisyon.. Kahit walang GPS ay alam ng Gripen kung saan ang posisyon nya...Ang pinaka-maganda ay meron malakas na Internal Jammer ang Gripen para lituhin ang kalaban at hindi sya ma-detect nito..
@cesarvelchez65276 ай бұрын
kahit wharthog lang okay na!
@defensenews18446 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment
@Kpdhfytgfkfg5 ай бұрын
F16 💪🇺🇸🇵🇭💪
@eduardoquirino81313 ай бұрын
ASAP Saab Gripen 12 units +2 (because it is already partially built), FA-50 PH upgraded 12 units (can be built fast) , F-16 one squadron.
@Abdul_hanif1236 ай бұрын
Gripen more relevant it can landing at hiway Luzon and Mindanao Island
@jasonchia23526 ай бұрын
suggest F15 and F35
@benktlofgren47106 ай бұрын
F-16 is not on par with Gripen E, anyone who claims so is a US fanboy. Also, to have an effective jet, you need a well-trained Pilot who knows the plane in and out. The maintenance and flight hour costs are extreme on the F-16 side, F-16 does nothing good if you can not afford to have the personnel trained in a top-notch manner. I do not even have to mention the bonus of dispersed usage of the Gripen, it is already clear what the winner is.
@edwinsalindong49896 ай бұрын
Agr😮ee..The weapon system alone that is included is already a winner.. It has many sensor system that you cannot find in F-16 even the latest version.. The Canard, Flat Panel Display, MAW, Internal Jammer for Electronic Attack and Supercruise ability are all the essential component that you cannot found in F-16..
@benktlofgren47106 ай бұрын
@@edwinsalindong4989 correct and on top of it F-16 is designed for US style of warfare and supply chains. None of that fits the Phillipines while the Gripen checks all boxes. The Philippines needs a jet that can act as a deterrent to prevent attacks in the first place, and defend the Philippines if the worst happens, and do as much damage as possible until foreign aid arrives.
@defensenews18446 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment
@benktlofgren47106 ай бұрын
@@defensenews1844 also no mention of Meteor and RBS 15 Mk4 Gungnir, named after Odin spear that never misses and is so well balanced so anyone can throw it :) When I think of it SAAB produces most of the things the Philippines needs, Subs, Jets, Ships, small, Assault boats, Torpedos, Anti-ship Missiles, and a lot more. All designed to defend a huge archipilago that contains even more islands than in the Philippines. As a Swede, i hope we strengthen the connection between our nations even more. If you want tech transfer and a chance to have some produced at home, SAAB is who you want to deal with.
@rolandjosef79616 ай бұрын
F-16V
@TonyChua-y3q6 ай бұрын
Dapat bumili na may budget na ata pra sa PAF. Yaan Air force Ang ist line of defense nation second Ang PN.. kaya importante na bumili na as soon as possible. PAF
@lancegallego18626 ай бұрын
Why not both?
@danieljuanson55026 ай бұрын
F-16
@infinitechi35445 ай бұрын
RP government should get 20 jets whether Grippen vs F-16 request the variant with larger wing span than regular F-16 wings with provisions on transfer of maintenance technology. Get a high end 30 drones size of MQ-1 or latest model drones with dual use for the coast guard and military requirements from different branches of the DND) with variant that can carry missiles and bombs, also capable in electronic warfare jammers or communications intrusion. Peace
@spider-man9106 ай бұрын
F 16 far more superior , the latest block variant has a whole host of upgrades from all weather radar to advanced avionics ...to the latest air to air missiles ...
@Munchkinz116 ай бұрын
The maintenance though compared to the Gripen which just needs few personnel to maintain.
@chillxxx2416 ай бұрын
I’m not sure if the can afford the newest variant of F-16. Not many militaries would pick the Gripen. Very few operated by just Brazil, South Africa, Czech Republic, Thailand and Hungary. Seems to be more of a “stop gap”. Thailand now uses more F-16s. Brazil is in negotiations to purchase 24 F-16s. Czechia is upgrading to the F-35. Hungary would like F-16s, but can’t afford them. South Africa really no longer has an Air Force.
@johna31426 ай бұрын
@@Munchkinz11 maintenance and support will not be a problem since there are a lot of third parties which can supply spare parts or can do MRO services of F-16s. Also the current existing EDCA provisions, VFA and JUSMAG where US sourced hardwares owned by PH have advantages in sustainment.
@johna31426 ай бұрын
@@chillxxx241 Thailand and Hungary are leaning towards a Gripen E buy. And Brazil, they are studying to buy used F-16 since their soon to be retired AMX jets need replacement and producing more batches of Gripen E takes a while and costs more.
@chillxxx2416 ай бұрын
@@johna3142 Wasn’t aware of this news. It also seems they are still looking to send Gripens to Ukraine in the future too.
@alesh22756 ай бұрын
Sweden is in the middle of its own Gripen upgrade and, from what I know, doesn’t really have the capacity to ramp up its Gripen production for other markets ..
@JuanitoCabanit5 ай бұрын
The Philippines will buy both
@divinavergara14326 ай бұрын
Both of them. EMV777
@randygloria10376 ай бұрын
Ang Magandang Tanong Dyan ay kung may balak bang bumili ang pilipinas.kasi ang tagal na nyan.kahit isa wala man lang nabili.paulit ulit na Lang Balita nakaka umay na.
@MrYoda19726 ай бұрын
ang tagal na nilang pinag-iisipan, panahon pa ni Digong, wala pa ring napili? F16 at SAAB Gripen lang naman, hindi limang fighter jet ang pipiliin. walang nang mangyayari dyan. matatapos nalang ang term ni PBBM wala paring mapili.
@jbats04286 ай бұрын
I agree. Same information over and over again.
@richiecabale38296 ай бұрын
Ay nko ang budget nakuha na sa eleksyun ngayung 25, wala mg aasahan..
@RalphPeligrino-mm3gr6 ай бұрын
Another botbot
@RalphPeligrino-mm3gr6 ай бұрын
Another botbot
@spider-man9106 ай бұрын
Gripens disadvantage is it's range and ceiling height , its powerplant is 1/3 rd less that of its rival ...weight to thrust ratio is a disadvantage. .... compared to. F 16 ...
@berniemorales90726 ай бұрын
Pwede naman drop tank
@สัญพงษ์สุวพิศ-ฉ5ช6 ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤
@GenXmind-d8b6 ай бұрын
1unit F16 = 1,000 figthing drones.
@WilfredoMarin-w1k6 ай бұрын
get them both pra lalong mlkas
@PrayerWarriorPh6 ай бұрын
I believe the Japanese made multi-role fighters are the best ones to buy.. perhaps the Mitsubishi F-2 right now are cheaper than the Korean made T-50. Also the F-X will be coming soon? We can now acquire F-2 multi-role fighters since Ph signed a defense pact with Japan a few days ago.
@defensenews18446 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment
@kornkernel22326 ай бұрын
If Japan can export them and if they offer cheaper deal with support and weapons for it, then maybe yeah. F-2 is basically larger and bit more capable F-16. I believe Philippines needs at least huge numbers of fighters on its arsenal. Fewer fighters even if they are 5th Gens won't cut it. Speaking of 5th Gen, maybe Philippines just skip it and wait for future 6th Gen, maybe there will be some cheaper 6th Gen from other allied countries. PH just only need few of those to compliment existing 4.5 Gen fighters
@TheBongReyes6 ай бұрын
This has become pretty comically. It seems every 2-3 months the Philippines finds ways not to make a decision. I really think the Philippines will never decide on either the Gripen or the F-16. And, eventually, will settle on more upgraded FA-50s. It’s really not that hard of a choice. Either the Gripen or the F-16 will be a significant upgrade to their Air Force. I’ve seen comments for months… “The right price…” Well, both are similar in cost. Gripen is cheaper to maintain. F-16 is more numerous and have a large worldwide stockpile of parts. If the Philippines wants to bargain shop then just buy more FA-50s from South Korea. They’ll be able to achieve 70-75% the capabilities provided by the Gripen or the F-16. Better than what they’ve had before.
@TheDaysOfGlory3 ай бұрын
Gripens can be here by 2025. Gripen C MS20 versions could easily protect PHL EEZ. These are already Sukoi killers. Gripens E would just dominate the skies, super cruising with each fighter carrying 7 Meteor missiles. HANDS DOWN.
@carlosbaluyot60253 ай бұрын
Hey guys, its been a long time to choose what is best for the PAF. War is just around the corner. Make up your mind. For the meantime, why not procure 12 F16 and 12 Jas Gripen as a deterrent to our enemies. Air force is lagging behind in comparison with the PN & CG. Hurry up guys, decide ASAP.
@alvinsangutan62666 ай бұрын
Bilhin na yong dalawa grepen f16 tag 1sguadron para malakas pang depensa sa west ph sea
@leon-z6r5 ай бұрын
F16 latest version 12 units
@gabriel7881717 күн бұрын
F16
@prafullamohantakumar89415 ай бұрын
Gripen is a best fighter jet than F16
@rab34926 ай бұрын
Depende yan magkano maipasok sa bulsa...
@regorflora79156 ай бұрын
best agains china is not a fighter plane nor more warships. we simply cannot compete against china, they will always have more. Mpapagastos lang tayo dyan. what we need is a small tactical nuclear missiles. mas low maintenance, at requires less manpower compare sa eroplano at barko, at higit sa lahat kamak na mas epektibong deterence laban sa china. A nuclear arm PH will gain china's respect.
@ryanreclozado50726 ай бұрын
Buy a dozen F16 and a dozen Gripen E and that's it ! 😊
@Psalm_96_2_KJV6 ай бұрын
Hindi po sila pwede bumili ng parehas. dapat 1 lang ang piliin nilang multirole para pareparehas at hindi malito ang mga sundalo sa paggamit.
@genendrasanaga214615 күн бұрын
If i have the power to choose i will go to A10 warthog 100 units is enoght ro be strong
@wenwensr.87186 ай бұрын
BUY NOW!
@JuanitoCabanit5 ай бұрын
The Philippines will buy both so there is no competition.
@johna31426 ай бұрын
Gripen E- if you want "low cost" to operate, BVR, EW advantage F-16- if you want logistics, user base and quantity advantage
@defensenews18446 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment
@jpinas82443 ай бұрын
Mas importante pa din precision missile at lakas ng missile f16
@TonyChua-y3q4 ай бұрын
I think F-16 much better already tested in middle east war we ha hope by 2025 even 16 units first batch to help FA-50 for patrolling in WPS.
@misterbig90256 ай бұрын
Can The Philippines afford any of them? Has it considered Indian HAL Tejas?
@TonyChua-y3q6 ай бұрын
Why don't we bought 12 units of F-16 and 14 units of Griffen which Sweden offered as last year.
@senioritovictorioofficial43176 ай бұрын
SAAB Gripen E is good
@defensenews18446 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment
@sh1nyarm0r6 ай бұрын
F-35
@rumjundelgado78226 ай бұрын
2trillion defense budget this year..
@Anonymous-v7r9j6 ай бұрын
Sa panaginip mo lng yan naniwala kpa😂😂😂
@efrenplaza6 ай бұрын
When we, US tax payers, give Philippines $500 million to help upgrade their military capability, it's prudent to reciprocate by buying US made and also for interoperability with US aircrafts and ease of implementing future upgrades. Utang na loob na nga babayaran mo ng pagbili ng iba. Hindi naman ugali ng Filipino yun.
@johnvball96 ай бұрын
F-16…because the proven aircraft.
@nitinat81816 ай бұрын
I believe that in the end the Philippines will definitely be forced by the Americans to buy the F16.
@bennuredjedi6 ай бұрын
The F2 or Tejas Mk1A or the KA50 upgraded single seat variant
@defensenews18446 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment
@quazars2365 ай бұрын
mas maganda yung pinaglumaan at araw araw maghingi ka ng code para makapag paandar.. puppet is life!
@HuwagSalangin5 ай бұрын
Go get the F16 and then upgrade to KF-21 next.
@yousteady6 ай бұрын
JAS Gripen E, is cheaper to operate and has more time to patrol in the air. Less crew and less runway to operate.
@Mudbakit6 ай бұрын
Why not buy F35 instead
@MilagrosCaguin6 ай бұрын
F50 din kz Lockheed Martin din yn
@sergegenobaten44185 ай бұрын
Hahay until now wala pa tayong mrf
@mikhelmartires47556 ай бұрын
Para sa akin GRIPEN... KNG ANO ANG KAYA NG BUDGET DON DAPAT MAG FOCUS NG MAGKAROON AGAD TYO DI UNG PURO ISIP ISIP WALA NMANG SAPAT NA BUDGET KAYA HANGGANG NGAYON WALA PA TYON MRF JETS 😭😭😭😭
@marukudo85326 ай бұрын
F2 ng Japan.
@ireneclark7456 ай бұрын
after US gave 500M usd, you have no options 😅
@MilagrosCaguin6 ай бұрын
Na sa piloto yn
@jhingabrigo69746 ай бұрын
Tora-tora nalang, hahahaha😂
@byron86576 ай бұрын
Yah F16 high cost high maintenance JAS Gripen 39E low cost easy low maintenance k!
@BasilLeaf-o4c6 ай бұрын
Philippines is undergoing a famine at the moment many are starving. I think the Philippines can better spend tax payers money on feeding the people than on weapons.
@michaelcalderon14056 ай бұрын
Gripen E is more expensive than F16 blk 50/70 . F16 is more proven fighter jets than gripen jets.so please pick f16.
@gilbertvoy64226 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂yung mga nag cocomments akala mo meron talagang maraming alam sa mga uri ng fighter jets😂😂😂😂
@Yannickille6 ай бұрын
Rafale is the best😂😂😂
@avionicsmanteddy6 ай бұрын
Both aircraft will not sale to Phil. 3 president have negociate nothing has come on story for vlogging 😂😂😂😂