FAA Drone Document Rules - What do You Need ?

If the FAA or Law Enforcement walk up to you when flying a drone and ask for your required documentation, what would you give them? 👀
☕☕ Enjoy the content? Buy Me a Coffee! www.buymeacoffee.com/AlienDrones
Thinking about your Part 107? This is the place to check out. Really.
🏅 Pilot Institute 107 course: bit.ly/3rwJrxV (or enter ALIENDRONES in the coupon section) you can get $100 off, they guarantee you pass or money back.
TRUST Test: www.scouting.org/the-recreati...
REGISTER your Drone: www.faa.gov/uas/getting_start...
When is Remote ID Needed?: • 🔥 TOP 18 Remote ID for...
👕 The now INFAMOUS Alien Drones FAA SHIRT SERIES here: alien-drones.myspreadshop.com...
== My Equipment ==
DRONES:
- FIMI X8 Pro: fimiuavstore.com/?ref=73m40rxb
- Potensic ATOM 3-Axis (Potensic Site): shrsl.com/48iws
- DJI Mini 2 se: amzn.to/43eotpS
- ATOM SE: amzn.to/3S26HRK
- Skydio 2+: skydio.pxf.io/NKrvEb
- DJI Mini 3 Pro: amzn.to/3WnWmRZ
- EXO Blackhawk 2 - Mini Pro: bit.ly/3BgyYg7
- Ruko F11 GIM2: amzn.to/36XBRX7
- EXO X7 Ranger Plus: bit.ly/3BgyYg7
- EXO Cinemaster2: bit.ly/3BgyYg7
- DJI Mavic Air 2s: amzn.to/3wlGUbI
-DJI Mavic Mini2: amzn.to/3gtK0ng
MISC. STUFF
- 💨TopTes Anemometer: amzn.to/3YQVxl5
- DroneTag Mini: bit.ly/3z3wNvh
- Lume Cube Strobe: amzn.to/2FmZHxt (EBAY): ebay.us/SVV6z3
- 64G Extreme SD Card: (Amazon) amzn.to/2JNk3Bi
CONTROLLER PARTS:
- Magnetic Charging Cable: (Amazon) amzn.to/3IEYdKW
- Remote Rt Angle Cable (Type C): amzn.to/2XNhJAj
- Remote Rt Angle Combo Pack (Type C, tablet and phone): amzn.to/37LpFWa
- Remote Rt Angle Cable (Lightning): amzn.to/2RTjYOy
- Remote Rt Angle Cable (Micro): amzn.to/33ye9cx
--TABLET Rt Angle cable (Type C): (Amazon) amzn.to/2oJ7Hkp
--- TABLET Rt Angle cable (Micro): amzn.to/2XVGHLY
-- Skyreat Tablet Holder (Metal NUT): (Amazon) amzn.to/3Y4PbO0
CAMERAS AND BLOGGING EQUIPMENT:
- Sony A6400: (Amazon) amzn.to/2EIt7mC
- Camera Tripod (Amazon) amzn.to/2rCQdr8
- Extension Tubes for Macro Photography (Amazon): amzn.to/2FRtRcN
🎤 DJI Mic: amzn.to/3BQItDo
🎤 Coiled TRS Mic Patch Cable (red): amzn.to/3IWKlOD
🎤 Coiled Saramonic TRS Patch Cable: amzn.to/3G8VxGB
🎤 Saramonic Lav (Black): amzn.to/3jgarBU
🎤 Saramonic Lav (White): amzn.to/3FEs7yC
Your support is appreciated as a small stipend may be received from associate links included here which cost you nothing, but helps support this channel and foster future content!
POST PROCESSING SOFTWARE:
Luminar Neo: skylum.evyy.net/a1rMeZ
DISCOUNT CODE for $10 OFF Luminar: "aliendrones"
Hey, Like the music? Audiio has a pay-once, lifetime plan, no subscription!: Audiio Link here: audiio.com/pricing?oid=1&affi... and Use “AlienDrones10” for 10% OFF! or "SAVE100" for $100 OFF a subscription!
Music from Audiio
Daniel Jorgensen: A Search For Somewhere Else_Talkative - (Instrumental)
RocknStock - Get Up (Copyright Free Music) Download free: tunetank.com/t/3m2k/5657-get-up
Any material included herein for illustration or example creates new value and complies with industry fair use best practices. Your support is appreciated as a small stipend may be received from associate links included here which cost you nothing, but helps support this channel and foster future content! Thank you again for visiting Alien Drones!

[@ParkerUAS]

As an Airport Operations specialist who gets these questions quite often, this is a pretty good explanation and one I will be pointing people towards when they have questions. To expound on why ALL drones are Part 107, it is because that is the section of the FARs that houses all the rules for UAS under 55 lbs. This is the same as Part 121 (All scheduled airline operations), Part 91 (All non scheduled, non commercial, non military flight), Part 103 (all manned aircraft under a max empty weight of 254 lbs ), etc. Another Part of the FARs that frequently catches non aviation people is Part 77 which outlines obstruction to air navigation. The big catch is anything over 250 feet ANYWHERE in the US as well as obstacles lower than that on a slope towards the nearest runway (if you are within 4 miles of any public funded airport, you're best to check) then you can't exceed that height without an Obstruction Evaluation. Lots of times cranes will be erected to do some quick operation (like HVAC on a warehouse) and not go through the process, because the process takes weeks. So, you have a poor crane operator getting a visit from someone like me because their obstruction makes my airport unsafe and I have to close a runway or sometimes the full airport. The crane operator is not only fined by the FAA (which isn't cheap), but is civilly liable for all costs associated with their disruption. The rules can be a PITA for all involved, but almost all of them are there from a safety standpoint that was unfortunately learned the hard way. To anyone wanting to fly your drone l, use the apps out there to check the airspace. If you're in a congested area, go only as high as you need. When in doubt, call the Airport Operations at the nearest airport. Most of us are drone pilots and love to talk about them. We're happy to give info on when and where are the best places to fly, how to fly safely around our airspace,and work to get you waivers if your mission requires it. Contrary to belief,most of the people in the FAA and airport operations want to help make the sky open to all, we just have to work a lot of compromises to make sure everyone fits.

[@AlienDrones]

Thanks for Sharing! 🤙

[@alacazaba]

Part 77 rules on obstruction are for "objects" and not aircraft, I would assume, correct? And is it 200ft AGL within 3NM, and then 300ft, 400ft, 499ft agl for every NM distant, up to 5NM?

[@ParkerUAS]

@@alacazaba it is for objects based on height. Moored balloons and such are tangentially related,but have their own specific rules. I don't want to get into a really long comment about the various imaginary surfaces over a runway. There are five of them (Primary, Approach, Transitional, Horizontal,and Conical) because each one could be its own topic. Basically, a decent rule of thumb is to assume a 20 to 1 slope from the edge of the runway. So go out 20 feet, up 1, another 20 and up another foot. The truth is there are various slopes depending on the length of the runway and additional, more restrictive slopes will be added for runways with instrument approaches. It gets pretty complicated at an airport like O Hare where you have multiple runways, extremely low visibility approaches,and they intersect. The FAA requires that any obstacle that may potentially violate these be evaluated. You can submit an OE/AAA (Obstruction Evaluation/ Airport Airspace Analysis) request for free online and usually get a report back in a couple of weeks. It will basically come back with how the obstacle effects the National Airspace System. To be VERY clear, it doesn't prohibit the object, it just outlines the impact and what must change in the NAS to accommodate it. It is the entities on the ground that can regulate it based on the impact to their airport. This is why cities don't get to build skyscrapers off a runway. Because the FAA says the runway is unsafe for use and their airport is then impacted. It is cheaper to zone the buildings then move the runway. So, moral of the story is if you are within about 4 miles (straight line) of a public use runway and need to do something taller than your roof line, do a quick Google Earth measurement to the nearest point of the runway and divide that number by 20. That is how tall you can go before the FAA cares. If the number is 250 or higher, the FAA will always care.

[@jay-dt3zq]

Hey Parker I have a question when someone gets pre-authorization to fly their drone and class D airspace does the control tower get notified that there is drones in the vicinity and are man pilots notified or have equipment on their airplanes that let them know that there is drones nearby?

[@ParkerUAS]

@@jay-dt3zq , So the authorization will be sent to Air Traffic Manager and the Airport Manager and will outline the time of the operation, location, and max permissable altitude. It will also detail if any operational changes need to occur at airport for safety (no instrument operation from a runway, closed runway, opposite traffic pattern, etc.). There will always be a note that operation of the drone still requires ATC approval and the ATC facility and Airport Operations must be called before liftoff and once the operation is complete. This is the part that catches most drone pilots. Just because you have the DroneZone paper doesn't mean you have carte blanche to fly. LAANC authorizations don't usually have that contact requirement, but LAANC is more tightly restricted on altitudes. There is nothing the drone sends out that a manned aircraft can detect. Aircraft have ADS-B In/Out for manned flights, but to minimize congestion, drones are only allowed to receive this info (ADS-B In), not transmit (ADS-B Out). If UAS operations are occuring within the Class D the best practices is for the Airport Authority to issue a Notice to Air Missions (NOTAM), which alerts air raft operators in the area. The ATC will then update their Automated Terminal Information Service (ATIS) to reflect the NOTAM. Authorization at a Class D isn't too difficult for a Part 107 that is willing to work around the operational tempo. Class C is harder, but possible as long as not in an approach corridor. Class B is exceedingly difficult and practically never gets authorized off the runway ends.

[@Jasontyo]

I still hear from all of these videos that, when asked, "the intent of my flight is solely for recreation and I had line of sight" would be hard to disprove in court, if it ever got that far.

[@AlienDrones]

Keep in mind it's easy for someone on a video to tell others to be cavalier about the rules but when you're in front of the judge and the FAA says you were not following the rules and here's why, the guys in the video won't be there to back you up, just sayin. In your other comment you mentioned you don't have a clue about CBOs. That in itself is against the rules and means the FAA (and the law) will judge your flights against part 107 rules and will add this to what will be a large list of 107 rules not followed, doesn't matter if they can't prove one beyond a reasonable doubt. The FAA isn't out to get people, I've actually found most to be really decent and they love the hobby. If you make some effort to become knowledgeable and follow the rules at all you likely won't have an issue even if something goes wrong.

[@bobbylefebvre6298]

Great information

[@4WingView]

If i havent said this before. I appreciate all you do for us. These subjects are not explained enough. Please , Please keep creating content like this. I share them with groups and on personal FB.

[@AlienDrones]

Thank you, I will! I do not say this often enough either and comments like these really do help creators out. It takes a lot of time and effort to put these together and if we only have trolls responding with crap, it makes it hard to do more. And let's face it, nobody LOVES more rules, so I get it. So make sure you comment your appreciation to your favorite creators, it is important and appreciated! 👽🛸

[@YellowRoseDrones]

Thanks. I just shared your video to a local drone group on the Nextdoor app.

[@AlienDrones]

Awesome, thank you, appreciate that! 🤙

[@RonaldBrown59]

Great information, thanks for sharing.

[@AlienDrones]

Glad it was helpful!

[@donpcola]

Thank you for touching on this subject. Everyone flying recreationally needs to know this information and have a plan. I agree with everything you said except for the ID part. If a local police officer or deputy comes up to you and asks for your ID, they still need reasonable articualable suspicion of a crime to ID you. If you are not breaking any laws, then you wouldn't have to show ID. From what I understand, the only thing you need to present is your trust certificate for a recreational flight. Again, thanks for touching on this important subject

[@AlienDrones]

Thanks for sharing!

[@Errr717]

Like my friend likes to say "you may have the right of way but the other driver is driving a Mack truck". If the LEO has been dispatched to investigate what you're doing, I would personally show him/her my ID because if I don't my interaction is gonna get ugly soon enough especially if the officer isn't too well versed in the FAA regulations.

[@ImperiumLibertas]

​@@Errr717 just ask "if I do not present my documents will I be arrested or fined?" If yes then comply, state "I'm complying under duress," and sue later since you have damages.

[@SC515]

Great information. Thanks for the post

[@AlienDrones]

Thanks for watching!

[@SC515]

I will add another comment that I ran into on this subject. I had pilons around me and two cameras filming, when my first hostel approach. I have my vest one. FAA COMMERCIAL PILOT LICENSE, Please do not disturb. 3 people. I dropped my controller down around my neck and handed one a packet with a letter stating do not interfere while I flying, I will lad and talk with you, my card and IDENTIFICATION. I had it documented and came out okay but it was not pleasant. I’m not here to educate you but I have a job. Clueless. I landed and was able to deescalate the situation and leave. Came back the next day to finish the job. But it was real interesting to see how people reacted when close to there property.

[@AlienDrones]

@@SC515 Indeed, some people don't care if it's legal or legit, they already have their mind made up and will be a jerk. It's not only drones, some people are just idiots and there's no fixing stupid, even when you're in the right... Fortunately at least for me, I've been able to turn _most_ situations into a positive, but sometimes it's better to walk away and try another day...

[@pioneerdroneoperations]

Thanks for the reminder to save all these documents to an easily accessible location.

[@AlienDrones]

Glad it was helpful!

[@inakidb]

yes another video from one of the channel that help faa.

[@AlienDrones]

Glad to help!

[@inakidb]

@@AlienDrones ;)

[@inakidb]

@OverlandWisconsinFTW sure. overcontrolled aerospace is the solution. 🎉

[@Hansaman58]

I live on 93 acres situated outside any flight restriction areas. I’ll fly my drone recreationally and whenever I choose, and “the man” is not coming onto my private property to check anything.

[@AlienDrones]

That's always a personal choice!

[@0utcast]

except the man has every right to enter with probable cause. but i feel ya. sadly i think that my time as a drone pilot is at an end. i havent flown in 7 Mo.

[@anonymoussoulFPV]

Not without a warrant, their not. The FAA has not jurisdiction on private property. Pursuant to the 9th and 10th Amendments, US Constitution, the federal government cannot assume powers not specifically granted to it by the Constitution. There has never been a constitutional amendment establishing the FAA in the US, until that happens, it is my position that the FAA has no constitutional authority over the actions of any private citizen. Congress cannot grant the FAA power, that Congress itself does not have under the US Constitution. Assuming that the FAA is constitutional, it does not have the authority regulate the privately owned air space that reaches the enveloping atmosphere of a persons real property, anymore than having the authority to regulate the airspace within ones home. The US Supreme Court has ruled, a landowner owns as much of the space above the ground as he can occupy or use in connection with the land. Flying a quadcopter around and above privately own trees, buildings, animals, or any other object owned, controlled, and connected to the property, is clearly an activity that is done in direct connection with the use of the land. Privately owned airspace is as much a property right as anything else attached to the property. The government cannot take possession of privately owned airspace and tell a landowner how privately owned airspace can, or cannot be used, without due process of law. The United States Supreme Court ruled, “We have said that the airspace is a public highway. Yet it is obvious that, if the landowner is to have full enjoyment of the land, he must have exclusive control of the immediate reaches of the enveloping atmosphere. . . . . The landowner owns at least as much of the space above the ground as they can occupy or use in connection with the land.” States v. Causby, 328 U.S. 256 (1946) If you don't stand up for your constitutionally protected rights, you don't have them.

[@anonymoussoulFPV]

@@0utcast On private property, the FAA cannot prove probable cause by simply observing a drone in the air. Without knowing who is flying the drone, how much it weighs, etc., there is no probable cause for anything, only speculation. Without the drone operator volunteering information related to the drone, the FAA can only assume that the drone in question is under 250 grams. Since a citizen has no obligation to witness against themselves, the FAA must make their own independent investigation on the matter, and cannot enter upon private property without a 4th Amendment warrant. Fly safe, fly free!

[@MikesGarageReviews]

@@0utcastnot without a warrant

[@nickrich710]

Cool👍😀

[@RebelByNature]

Show me your papers Comrade! Actually, thanks for this. I have heard various people make comments on this topic lately (e.g. heard one person say you had to have a copy of the CBO rules with you) and I appreciate you addressing it.👍

[@AlienDrones]

Show me your papers Comrade! Oh, and you're vaccination card! Wait, that's a different video, lol. Thanks for sharing! 🤙

[@1stAmendmentDrone]

Show me your badge! Displays a state or city badge. -Kick rocks. Show me your badge! Displays a Federal id, not a USPS id either. -How may i help you. This is how it’s going to stay too.

[@CGAZ66]

I Have my trust certification. Need to find it as I have not flown my drone in awhile.ohh and need to re register it too.

[@cybertelevision]

Did you print it out, or did they send it to you via email? [Contact them?] /// Also, it seems strange that, I do not see a gov website data Website, that would allow verification of license (TRUST), via name, email and or License number of the given, (TRUST LICENSE), that has been issued. Would be nice to be able to verify you have a valid TRUST License, and did not have a, (maybe not good one done), does anyone have an answer on this????? - Should not the Government have a data base on this, so that you and or authorities may check? - PLEASE COMMENT, or is this a xyz ........ ? /// And, NO NO NO, blah blah blah, just take again??? - How would a ........ verify your TRUST license in the field?

[@alacazaba]

as for cbo's, pilot institute has an article about WHICH cbo to choose for rules to follow....you don't need to be a member to follow the cbo's, btw. The 3 CBOs noted: Academy of Model Aeronautics (AMA), First Person View (FPV) Freedom Coalition, Flite Test Community Association (FTCA) ----- and these rules apply whether you fly under 250g up to 55lb. If you are 107, when flying rec you will need to cite a CBO.

[@mattalford3932]

I just randomly picked one because it's pointless.

[@stephenstewart6091]

Thank you for the excellent videos!! I used to fly small RC planes and helicopters but after a many year break, am just starting back and decided to try small drones. All just for fun! I diligently studied the rules and feel confident that I am fully in compliance with 44809 (TRUST certificate, registration, B4UFLY, LAANC when needed and I’ve studied the latest AMA (CBO) rules). My lingering anxiety is that some local authority who is not completely informed about the real regulations, and is instead influenced by media hype to be fearful of drones as some kind of threat to humanity, is going to ruin my enjoyment and turn it into some kind of legal nightmare. I never had that kind of fear with my little foam park-flyer RC planes. No one else feared them back in the day either. Stray baseballs or angry hawks were more perceived dangers! Even a tiny “quad-copter” does not sound like a threat. But, put the name “drone” on it and rational thought seems to go out the window.. This video helps me feel a little more confident. Please pardon the rant. Here are my more constructive questions: Do you think it is worth the extra money for me to actually re-join the AMA to get a card confirming I am a member and am therefore operating under those rules? I don’t think it is technically required but wonder if you know of any situations where this was practically helpful? I am also studying to get the full 107 certificate for a similar reason. Not because I think I really need it for my personal hobby, but because that certification might help me avoid potential unwarranted issues. Fun learning more about general aviation in any case. Your thoughts on that? I know I’m likely being overly cautious. That is just what us folks who try to follow the rules do 😊.

[@BluSkyOne1]

You realize you can right now, get into an ultralight aircraft that weighs 254 pounds, it poses a far more significant threat to manned aircraft and not have to do anything the things FAA is requiring for 251 gram drone? How is that fair? This is why I mostly ignore FAA I use LAANC and stay under 400 feet, I use LAANC to avoid restricted airspace beyond that the FAA isn't going to over regulate my hobby or ruin my fun. I'd be happy to school FAA in SCOTUS about my rights they are violating.

[@gotubeit11]

Great educational videos! I have the New DJI Mini 4 Pro (under the weight limit)....and I am not planning to register it because I only fly on my property or maybe a hike to check out the view. Do I have to carry any of that paperwork being my drone is a mini? Additionally... my drone does NOT require Remote ID but apparently it came installed and puts out a signal anyway....what can I do to avoid being on the radar to protect myself from someone having bad intentions coming to find me???

[@AlienDrones]

This is a very common misunderstanding. Being below 250g doesn't get you any exemptions except _possibly_ registration. So, yes, regardless of the weight you still need the paperwork mentioned here (Items 1-5, with the exception of item #3 since you are planning not to register). #4 is situational, so depending what you're doing or where you're flying it may be a requirement, even as a recreational pilot. As far as the broadcast transmitting, if that's a concern there is no option except to use a different drone. The RID cannot be turned off on UASs supplied with RID already installed.

[@fez3606]

A recent update from DJI makes the mini 3 and 4 pro NOT transmit RID with the smaller battery installed, those drones DO transmit with the PLUS battery installed.

[@AlienDrones]

@@fez3606 Indeed, that is a welcomed recent decision by DJI to serve the recreational community. I'm sure they were seeing a huge decrease in sales because of the RID transmitting regardless.... Money talks, sometimes.

[@markkempton4579]

This is the simplest yet most comprehensive list I've seen. Now off to find my aircraft registration certificates. Where do you get the fancy FAA-printed recurrent certificate? Did they mail that? I just took it online and don't remember getting anything nice like that.

[@AlienDrones]

Thanks! It's been a few months but I thought there was a button or link to "print" the recurrent certificate... Could always take it again to get to to the screen again. It's nice that its free and easy now instead of spending $150 and heading off to a testing center every 2 years.

[@peacefulthrillseeker]

There is an option to Download it as a PDF and save it on your phone just like the waiver and Lannc. Also, it’s very rare for an FAA inspector to show up when your flying but this video is helpful when they check for papers 🤣

[@AlienDrones]

@@peacefulthrillseeker Indeed it is rare, I imagine if you fly a lot in controlled airspace near high profile airspace you would have a significantly increased probability of FAA or local security/police rolling up...

[@peacefulthrillseeker]

@@AlienDrones it’s more common for a police officer to come up to you than the FAA in most situations which has happened to me before. To mitigate this and a professional courtesy( especially when working a gig) is to approach law enforcement as well as other officials and give them a heads up, show them credentials, etc. you’d be surprised how much they appreciate that and they will go as far as assist you with the operation 👍🏽

[@rockyo967]

A little late to the party, but in all the previous videos, interviews, etc, has it ever been explained why the remote ID needs to broadcast the operators location. I can understand, rather I agree or not, with wanting the UAV locations and id number. Anyone that really needed more than that would be from the FAA and have access to their database.

[@harrysimpsonimages]

I know all the videos I see on KZbin and Facebook flying over people, at night, >400 ft etc are not 107 certified. It seems pretty wild west out there with a lot of drone pilots not even knowing what 107 is.

[@AlienDrones]

Indeed, that is true. We can thank many of them for the increasing restrictions, regulations and new laws that are continuing to target the hobby for sure... I've reached out to a few just suggesting they may want to look at the rules and most of the time they say that the rules don't apply to them for one reason or another, especially because recreational flyers of mini drones don't need to follow any rules, it's just a toy. I guess it's like the tree falling in the forest making a sound analogy: If I don't read or acknowledge any rules, do they even exist? Apparently not. 😎 Thanks for sharing!

[@wyewound]

So I have a DJI mini pro 4. I have both the 249g battery and the above 249g identify battery. If registered can I fly my drone based battery used. Commercial on one and recreational on the other?

[@AlienDrones]

Nope, not quite depending on what you're implying. The problem is that if the drone is registered it must also transmit remote ID. If you put the smaller batteries in to fly recreationally under USC 44809 and the remote ID turns off you are non-compliant because the drone is still registered and not transmitting RID, so you'd have to add a RID module to it. You could de-register it, but then you'd have to re-register it (and pay another $5) to register it again every time you change batteries, IF you want to fly recreationally under 44809 rules. What you could do though is simply fly under part 107, but in a "recreational fashion". This means you are still following part 107 rules flying for fun, but under part 107 rule set and you are not following USC 44809 rules, ever. Hope that makes sense.

[@MrRaymond1021]

Very nice Keith. Although, I never knew that we "pilots" COULD GET a waiver for BVLOS. Even though I never fly more than I can see, but yeah. If I ever wanted one, where do I get one? Thanks for sharing. 👍👍👍

[@AlienDrones]

Thanks! It is possible, have to apply and be approved for it through the Drone Zone. It is a very difficult one to get but it has been done.

[@MrRaymond1021]

@@AlienDrones Thanks again.

[@dadge2500]

Does any of this have to be done with a 249 g drone?

[@AlienDrones]

All of the items mentioned in the video (certificate, ID, authorizations, CBO Rules) with the 1 possible exception of registration (maybe), are legally required for drones under 250g as well. This is a common misconception that sub 250g drones get a pass on any rules or regulation but this is simply not true. Please take a moment and take the TRUST test, it is required, easy, free and it is helpful to get some basic understanding of flying drones legally: www.scouting.org/the-recreational-uas-safety-test/ . Any questions let me know, happy to help if I can.

[@Powertuber1000]

You forgot to say, no remote ID needed and no registration if under 250 grams and flying recreationally.

[@AlienDrones]

Didn't forget, just beyond the scope of a 3 minute vid. "If your drone is registered for any reason..."

[@Yyz1971]

Thank you! I just watched a few of your videos and just got the Trust Certificate. Part 107 Next!

[@AlienDrones]

Nice! 🤙 Thanks for sharing!

[@CtoGuantanamo]

But will a registered drone under 250g fliying recreationaly still need remote ID? My first gen Mavic Mini doesn't support RID and it's so expensive to get that module!

[@RebelByNature]

Yes, if it's registered, game over, need RID. Need it to be registered? If not, I believe you can un register it.

[@AlienDrones]

@CtoGuantanamo , @RebelByNature is correct, IF you fly _only_ recreationally. If it is registered for any reason, even if it's not required (that's why I say it this way) then it needs RID. Holy stone is the cheapest stand alone module I've tested to date kzbin.info/www/bejne/eYqXpKx_oq5srsk , and it's fairly light as well. And you can simply un-register it if registration isn't required, then no remote ID is needed! 🤙

[@Jasontyo]

the CBO part I still really have no clue about.......

[@AlienDrones]

Have you checked out this video? Might help: kzbin.info/www/bejne/mGTcgoyibMp0m7M

[@Jasontyo]

@@AlienDrones I have. I just find the CBO rules contradictory and so restrictive I may as well not have this drone.

[@KrazyK78]

What kind of ID is my kid going to have to prove he is eho is named on thr TRUST certification? There is no age restriction for TRUST thst i am aware of.

[@AlienDrones]

That's a good question. First, they should be named on the TRUST certificate. For an ID, this is an exception that I imagine would be the same if any juvenile were stopped/questioned by the authorities for something else. Not that I can confirm or deny that I was ever in this situation but if something is being done that warrants further action (flying in an unsafe manner, flying in controlled airspace or restricted launch/land zone, basically not following rules) and in the absence of an ID in the case of a minor, then they will ask name and where they live/staying and follow them home to take it further with the parent/guardian. You are the responsible one in this situation.

[@surfart5448]

what is Part 107 Small Uas Recurrent - Part 61 Pilots certification, course #ALC -515 ?

[@AlienDrones]

That's the recurrent if you have your part 61 (manned aircraft certificate) as well as part 107 (remote pilot certificate).

[@Leonardokite]

Government regs..... Grrrrrrrrr

[@AlienDrones]

🐶 Grrrr.... 😅

[@0utcast]

As Admiral Kathryn Janeway said: Oh, the almighty Temporal Prime Directive. "Take my advice: it's less of a headache if you just ignore it."

[@AlienDrones]

But Janeway got lost, for years, and I think the promotion to Admiral was honorary. Not sure she's the one to take advice from... just sayin'😅

[@Ozkar2023]

I register to FAA with the trust test requirement got both on digital haven't print it yet... question the number for the drone does it have to be on the below 250grams mavic mini? Thanks edit he aloft app you mentioned on another video is saying that the max altitude on queens NY and Jamaica queens village is of 50 feet which is miles away from the airport or hospitals ( by the look of the app colored circle ) I message them showing maps of the highway and the MTA train yard that is huge I said my drone fits is my hand so imagine how small microscopic it shows on the map way out of range of any airplane traffic ...airplanes don't fly below 200 feet I fly usually 100 feet max but trees are taller than 50 feet it's ridiculous I have to fly below 50 in Sunnyside queens or queens village when the airport is about 30 minutes away by train ( just a rant about aloft FAA rules )

[@AlienDrones]

If you're flying for fun only, then you do not have to register the drone if it is less than 250g. If you are not flying for fun OR the drone weighs more than 250g (even if you're still flying for fun) then you have to register it and install Remote ID. I understand about having a altitude restriction where it doesn't make sense. Keep in mind that sometimes the apps are just wrong. I had that once and I sent in a request for review on the app (I think it was Airmap at the time) and it took a couple of days but the map was updated and the restrictions in the area were gone.

[@Ozkar2023]

@@AlienDrones thanks I registered because the holystone is a little more than 250grams but when it started to go crazy on me I stopped flying above tree level so I bought the mavic mini so my registration would be for the mini and whatever I buy after then... thank you 👍

[@mr.eggplant866]

It's the camera that Scares 'Them'.

[@AlienDrones]

...and their shadow... 😎

[@ATLAS-_-.]

So what you're telling me is that even though I'm flying under the weight and recreationally, I'm needing to get certification to fly my drone, at this point I might as well just forget about my tiny drone, get a nice big drone register it, get the certification even though I don't want to deal with the stupid remote ID, especially where all that's going to do is cause you to get harassed by anyone and everyone because they have a Nifty app to harass you.

[@KazanskyAlex]

Do I need anything of these, if I fly a sub 250g fpv drone ?

[@AlienDrones]

Yes, all things mentioned (either recreational or Part 107) plus you need a VO (visual Observer) to be legal. Look up the CBO from the FPV coalition fpvfc.org/safety-guidelines for the CCBO to follow.

[@KazanskyAlex]

@@AlienDrones yeah, I know I need to folow CBO rules But I mean, need I have anything with me as I not regestred the drone, because it sub 250g ?

[@AlienDrones]

@@KazanskyAlex You need everything mentioned in this video (certificate, ID, waivers/authorizations, plus CBO rules printed is recommended) PLUS you need a VO present (another person watching without goggles) if you're flying with goggles... The only thing not registering gets you is that you don't need registration documents or remote ID, you need everything else.

[@KazanskyAlex]

@@AlienDrones Thank you for your answers, but I still didn't get where I can get the certificate and the waiver ?

[@AlienDrones]

@@KazanskyAlex The certificate is the TRUST certificate. It is REQUIRED to be legal to fly in the US, at a minimum www.scouting.org/the-recreational-uas-safety-test/ . Its FREE, easy and is very informative. The waivers/authorizations are only needed if you NEED waivers or authorizations depending on the airspace you're flying in. This may be LAANC authorization or something else. Once you take the TRUST test, it will make more sense, it is a good way to start learning all the details of flying a drone legally according to the FAA. If you have questions once you pass the TRUST test feel free to ask, happy to help.!

[@steve_beatty]

What would I give them ? The middle finger...that's what...The FAA and the AMA can kiss my shiny metal butt...I've been flying rc for 40 years now...without guvmint help...More people die every year from baseball injuries than ever flying rc... The new FAA rules allow flying over people and property..Something we hobbyists deemed a hazard too many years ago to count.. good idea FAA...🙄

[@AlienDrones]

Why is your butt metal? 😅

[@steve_beatty]

@@AlienDrones I identify strongly with Bender the Robot and his attitude towards unnecessary intrusions on my life ..😅

[@AlienDrones]

@@steve_beatty 😅

[@mattalford3932]

What i want to know is why is my drone listed on the declaration of compliance list when it is incapable of broadcasting a remote id signal. It literally doesn't have the built-in hardware, yet there it is all compliant and shit according to the agency that'll fine me if i fly it, lol. Im going to fly it anyway. Im sure Mr FAA agent man has a non answer.

[@bobbylefebvre6298]

I have my trust test on my phone

[@AlienDrones]

Easiest way!

[@Markevans36301]

So, I need more documents to fly a 260 gram foam board model airplane than I needed to fly a Cessna back when I was flying maned aircraft. Makes perfect sense.

[@rickdavid1795]

Your paperz pleeze…

[@felixruiz2838]

All you have to say is " Can you educate me please !" 😂😂😂😂 to FAA person or Start running ...😂😂😂

[@AlienDrones]

...and hope the drone doesn't do an auto RTH! 😅

[@nightlightabcd]

If law enforcement comes up to you asking silly questions, ask him about the regulations on GUNS!!!

[@nightlightabcd]

I will never, NEVER take or pay for the extremely government overreach Part 107! It is none of the FAA's business if I post drone video on KZbin or not! None of their business!! The business of the FAA should be for safety, not shakedowns! How about the FAA concentrate on Boeing instead of drones!

[@beentheredonethat6219]

Great video! I’m a FAA 107 pilot and carry all my paperwork including my insurance and certifications in a binder. I find many recreational flyers especially those with sub 250 drones think they don’t have to do any training. I direct them to the FAA website to take the trust test and explain how easy it is.

[@AlienDrones]

Indeed, I've had many conversations with newbies that think "sub 250g = exempt" from any rules/regulations... That's the right thing to do is point to the TRUST, it is very informational if you're new to the hobby...

[@oneninerniner3427]

We need insurance too? Anybody want to buy a Phoenix, cheap :(

[@AlienDrones]

@@oneninerniner3427 Insurance is not a requirement. It may be prudent depending on how/where you fly, but not required by the FAA.

[@mikehays6526]

Where r u getting your ins from and how much?

[@beentheredonethat6219]

@@mikehays6526 SkyWatch. Depends on how much you fly and what coverage you want. Starts at $10 for an hour. If you fly on and off you can do monthly $46 and up or if you fly all the time, $466 for a year

[@slosher42]

I dont answer Questions.

[@RebelByNature]

Any suggestions on the least obnoxious set of CBO rules to say you are following?

[@AlienDrones]

Indeed, the one I show that I was clicking in the video is the least obnoxious one by far. I actually said that in a part of the video that got cut to try and get closer to 3 minutes... 😎

[@RebelByNature]

@@AlienDrones Perhaps rules need to flexible 🤣

[@George-nt8uw]

So not remembering which CBO rules one is following defaults one back to part 107 rules. I am amazed at all the well thought out and expensive traps they have created for us.

[@GarryFPV]

haha I know right

[@nightwaves3203]

I can train the drone police for a fee. It'll cost them airfare to Ukraine and a small fee to cover the costs of police whistles for them to run around fields with. I'm sure Russia and Ukraine would give me an armored vehicle they could drive around with. We all love our fun.

[@07087joenj]

there are more regulations on Drones now than Guns...amazing..!

[@middleagedbaldguy6774]

My question from the beginning is how does this do anything to prevent bad actors from misbehaving? I already have a part 107, can read a sectional and understand where and when I can fly. How does this benefit me or the general public? A few years ago, at AUVSI there were rumors floating around that several appointees at the FAA were heavily invested in some of the tech being developed for RID and hence the push for it in the industry. I also own and fly paramotors. Something with much more mass, combustible fuel, and a twentieth the maneuverability of any of my sUAS platforms and the FAA couldnt care less. Legislation should be based in logic.

[@anonymoussoulFPV]

Legislation must meet the mandates of the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights, otherwise the law or rule in invalid!

[@fjanson2468]

Exactly, these rules are insane for tiny drones when a paramotor carrying hundreds of pounds of who knows what, with ranges of over 100 miles has no regulation at all. What are they protecting and who is paying them to push this insanity?

[@mr.eggplant866]

'They' fear the Camera.

[@ghettogardens1]

@@fjanson2468 Government is concerned that "We the People" might use a drone pursuant to our second amendment rights!

[@0utcast]

lol nope haha yeah im not carrying any of that + i let my registration lapse. I actually havent flown my drone since last june. anyone interested in a mavic air 2 (not the 2S) with 3 batteries that have undergone 50-60 charge cycles? as for govt regs... As Admiral Kathryn Janeway said: Oh, the almighty Temporal Prime Directive. ***"Take my advice: it's less of a headache if you just ignore it."***

[@robskully3539]

almost feel the same way. Bought my Mavic 6 years ago and really only fly it once or twice a year. But after watching videos on this channel again and watching videos on Pilot Institute I am really thinking of doing the 107. I was against getting it before because I thought you had to take tests every few years and had to pay. Now I thought I read that you take the test once and it is good forever plus the Pilot Institute course is guaranteed 👍🏻 . I just found about that channel just today and now subscribed to it and will also checkout all he has to offer on his website … Thanks to this channel 👍🏻👍🏻

[@0utcast]

@@robskully3539 i see what your saying and good if that works for you but i cant say the same for my scenario as i really dont have any vested interest in shelling out the money for a part 107 when the type of flying i did didn't neccesitate one. its just another hoop for me to have to jump through and then theres always going to be another one after that.

[@Diantane]

I'm a recreational license operator. My house is surrounded by 800 acres of USDA government land. Have lived here for over 18 years and know all the employees here very well. Asked for permission to fly my drones before I started over a year ago when I retired. Never been approached by anyone when flying, but my registration number affixed to all of my drones.

[@anonymoussoulFPV]

The FAA and its rules, are clearly unconstitutional as applied to a private citizen. Remote ID and part 107 are a blatant violation of the Bill of Rights. When anyone is approached by any government agent, they are under no obligation to answer any questions or produce any information. Every citizen has a right to reman silent and have counsel present when government is questioning them. Remember anything you say or do, can and will be used against you in a court of law. Don't say anything, keep your mouth closed, and shut up. Fly safe, fly free!

[@RickyL305]

By any chance do you yourself have a 107 license? If so have you taken the latest one in which is actually a lot different in many questions that newer material would need to be studied. The charts remain the same though of course and about four or five of the old questions but that is about it. I believe it was February 9th. It was announced that the 2024 test would be out by that coming up Thursday. I tried rushing it in to focus my attention on the older study materials and test, the ,2024 107 test actually came out Tuesday so I was clearly wrong however I was still able to pass it. What I am getting to is the ,2024 test in regards to all the new laws and such focused on safety for all people around and operation of the flight. Therefore I was all for people understanding the test actually.. Yes I plan on part time commercial flying but only part time. I had studied hard for the test more to learn the safety areas of operating drones. Having the license is just an extra benefit nothing more. I do not know many drone operators either recreational and or 107 licensed however I flown my drone in a area I could legally with other drone operators in the area, unfortunately, I was hit over time unexpectedly twice by a inexperienced drone operator. The drone did not have the propeller guards on them and I was hurt pretty bad in one of the situations therefore I felt learning about everything could be beneficial for all to actually study nowadays. As much as you feel it is unconstitutional, please at least respect that the new test is for the safety and well being for all.

[@anonymoussoulFPV]

@@RickyL305 The airways are a public easement. We all have a constitutionally protected right to use them. The airways belong to all of us. As long as a private citizen flies their property (drone) in a manner that does violate the life, liberty or property of another, that person does not have to get governments permission to do so. In the event that a person flying a drone does violate the rights of another person, we have the "Bill of Rights" and due process of law to settle the issue. Part 107, does it violate the 1st Amendment? Is flying an FPV drone an art form? Are drone videos and photos an expression of that art form? Are drone videos, and photos, the intellectual property of the drone owner? Does the 1st Amendment protect the drone owners intellectual property from arbitrary government control and regulation? Does Part 107 violate 1st Amendment protections? While using a drone, can the FAA license, regulate and control a private citizen's 1st Amendment right to freedom of expression? Can a private citizen’s 1st Amendment intellectual property be sold without the permission and/ or licensing of the FAA? Does Part 107 turn 1st Amendment rights and protections into mere privileges that can be arbitrarily denied, regulated and controlled by the will of FAA without due process of law? "When rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491.

[@RickyL305]

@@anonymoussoulFPV ..... I understand a lot when rules and laws change people get frustrated, I do and the only thing and this is why people need to turn to their local and state law makers if not the new rules and laws will be set in place. I have been hearing about case law being established now which occurs every time certain judicial actions are taken , some for the benefit of pilots both recreational and licensed and other times for those against them as well. I obviously see things a bit more different than you to at least to some degree anyhow. A example is, do you know that there is a drone pilot who claims he knows the laws , has a DJI drone I believe a mini two in Philadelphia who has his drone registered for the $5 dollars, claims he did the trust test but claiming he is a 107 drone Pilot who flies his drone on KZbin with a lot of subscribers not only getting paid monthly by KZbin but takes in daily donations from his subscribers for his video uploads which is against 107 commercial pilots rules and regulations. This man had his background check done by others proving he is a convicted two time child molester, charges of thefts, drugs, robbery ext. (18 charges in total that's viewable on Philadelphia dockets. ) It is not the same Philadelphia pilot now being fined 200 k for legally flying without the 107 either but a totally different pilot in the same general area. What I am getting at is why have such people giving drone pilots a worse reputation knowing this man had been charged and convicted as as a child sexual offender, court records showed he pimped these girls out and provided drugs to these children. Thank God the FAA for the 107 license do their own government background check as this guy is still on the streets of Ohio today taking videos of everyone including children. Sorry to inform you though we see things differently, certain rules and laws need to be in place but I will say that in a compromise that if there are rules and laws that do violate anything of course I would stand in support to have laws amended.

[@anonymoussoulFPV]

@@RickyL305 Your last comment, is nothing more than an emotional rant and completely off point. We are talking about constitutional law here. The man you are referring to, is presumed to be innocent. He is entitled to due process of law. I wasn’t there, so I don’t know what he did or didn’t do. I’m not going to try him in the court of public opinion. In the United States, we have a constitution that protects us from the FAA’s unconstitutional overreach! My understanding, Part 107, violates the 1st Amendment, by regulating and licensing a citizen's inalienable right to “freedom of expression”. It also denies the citizen ownership of the intellectual property derived from “freedom of expression.” Look at Remote ID. On its face, it completely destroys the Bill of Rights. How can the FAA, a government agency, whether in public or not, force a citizen to wave their constitutionally protected rights (1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th Amendments) and submit to, without probable cause and/ or a 4th Amendment warrant, government tracking, surveillance, and control of a citizens private movements while enjoying a business or hobby, all while collecting and recording evidence that can, and will be used against a citizen in any FAA prosecution against them in a court of law? And, in most cases, forcing a citizen to pay for the surveillance equipment that will be used against them? How is this not a blatant violation of the Bill of Rights? "An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442 No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law! "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803) When the FAA is compliant with the Bill of Rights, I might consider complying with the FAA! Until then, fly safe, fly free.

[@RickyL305]

@@anonymoussoulFPV ... He has his due process and was convicted in court , you just have no idea.

[@HelloDonkey9]

Ridiculous all the documents and proof that is required to fly a toy on my own land.

[@leehester9801]

I like that you're answering questions. That's great. The answer is great. I hate the fluff. HATE IT!!! Coffee? Clock? Just do it without the fluff please.

[@omegaplumbing]

More rules that never get enforced.

[@frankmoralesiii6908]

Bought a small drone (Mavic) when I left Calf and moved to Texas. I have flow it off and on with a group called The El Paso Drone Hive. But like the Hive I am loosing interest in the thing and decided not to fly it anymore. It was fun, as a recreational flyer, in the beginning but I don't plan making money from such activity so, bye, bye drone flying.

[@WestVirginiasBigred271]

If you are flying a drone under 250 grams you don’t need to register your drone unless you’re flying a part 107 flight. However you don’t need any documentation to fly a drone that doesn’t require registration. And even if you’re registered and are flying your drone. The law says that you don’t need to show your identification unless you’re suspected of a crime. There for you don’t have to show them anything. This has already been proven several times by drone pilots who had an encounter with law enforcement officers. As long as you are following the FAA guidelines you have no reason to show them anything. If you have done something illegal and they have seen it then you should provide your information. Let’s say you are flying your drone at a local park. You have not done anything illegal or wrong and police just want you to verify some identification or a proof of registration or something. Tell them to Go F themselves. Don’t forget in America you are protected by the constitution of the United States. If you are in another country then you might just be screwed. I don’t know I don’t follow laws about countries that I have never been to or ever planning on visiting.

[@SeeFPv-qm6ie]

Unless you have under 250 grams 😂

[@AlienDrones]

All of the items mentioned in the video (certificate, ID, authorizations, CBO Rules) with the 1 possible exception of registration (maybe), are legally required for drones under 250g as well. This is a common misconception that sub 250g drones get a pass on any rules or regulation but this is simply not true. Please take a moment and take the TRUST test, it is required, easy, free and it is helpful to get some basic understanding of flying drones legally: www.scouting.org/the-recreational-uas-safety-test/ . Any questions let me know, happy to help if I can.

[@markkempton4579]

Not correct. ALL drone operators must have their certificate (either TRUST or 107) and your drone registration certificate (if you registered it) and (assuming you are making this comment because you aren't flying Part 107) the name of your CBO at a minimum (printed copy of those regs recommended).

[@dogstar7]

All this advise seems to be predicated on many in your audience not having their Part 107 certification and the implication that their flights may or may not be within compliance to begin with. Here's a thought; Get your certification and make every effort come into compliance. Don't fly if there is any question on whether you are doing so lawfully. Nobody is paying you to be an outlaw. It is not profitable to proceed in ignorance.

[@AlienDrones]

I tried to give a balanced overview of both recreational and part 107 requirements because everybody starts out being recreational first, then progress to part 107 if it makes sense for them. Part 107 certification isn't for everybody, but regardless of your certification status, trying to be educated and follow the appropriate rules and knowing the consequences if you don't is always good form... I agree with you that everyone should "get your certification" as long that means that it could be part 107 or recreational certificate.

[@wp9002]

Shouldn't there be a choice for people who do not want to get their 107 certification yet want to legally fly a drone?

[@RebelByNature]

@@wp9002 There is a choice. AS the video says it's a choice, they call it an exception, but either way congress says there is a choice. I am not interested in getting a 107. It's not required and I don't need it to do anything I particularly want to do.

[@RebelByNature]

Most drone fliers are recreational. It's not even close.

[@felixruiz2838]

I start as a hobbyist and there is where I stay Many think a 107 is going to make MONEY 💰 for you It's all a fad . Just follow the rules and stay away from strangers !

[@JoeCosentino]

Toed my quad into the trash, all you people kept calling them drones and the stupid public thinks you are spying on them it’s not worth all this to for around an ope field

[@tomrowe8728]

What stupidity will be next

[@NightRiderT7]

This crap should tell you one thing you own nothing and that government owns you. A free man doesn’t ask permission just gets it done.