I remember the boxart of the Ar 240 in 1/72 by Revell and it was drawn as a night fighter. It looked badass
@BV-fr8bf6 ай бұрын
So the equivalent of the Me210 twin engine aircraft, without the large production orders & the fix, the replacement plane is a '4' series aircraft (Me410 and Ar440.)
@micodyerski16216 ай бұрын
Thanks for that. I never of this one before.
@mickmuzzmkmz16286 ай бұрын
Interesting video, but an explanation for the unusual "hollow" spinners, shown on the DB603 powered examples, would have been nice.
@gort82036 ай бұрын
It was the intake for the engine coolant radiator.
@robbudden6 ай бұрын
Yes, pressurised annular radiators. The spinnersbhad internal fans
@jlvfr6 ай бұрын
Is there _any_ plane of that era that Eric Brown didn't fly?!
@IntrospectorGeneral6 ай бұрын
I don't think that he ever flew the Short Sunderland, Consolidated Coronado, or Martin Mariner flying boats which were all in service with the UK during WW2. He flew the big Blohm & Voss flying boats so it obviously was due to lack of confidence. There are a number of Japanese fighter types missing from his list and, for the truly pedantic, he didn't fly the CAC Boomerang.
@jlvfr6 ай бұрын
@@IntrospectorGeneral so he only flew 95% :)
@IntrospectorGeneral6 ай бұрын
@@jlvfr I check the list every few years for additions. A man who flew that many aircraft is bound to forget a few. The Bell P-63 doesn't appear on the 'official' Guinness Records list but is recorded as flown on a day when he flew eight different aircraft types (of the 30 types he flew that month). The list is about 100 longer than when I first read about Eric Brown circa 1970.
@robbudden6 ай бұрын
Basically, yes
@derekowens18176 ай бұрын
Only one Aichi type, no Avia, Fokker, IAR, Kawanishi or Tachikawa models and, presumably many other aircraft not flown by him. D
@edxcal846 ай бұрын
Had they gone with a more conventional flap/aileron set up, this might have helped with stability.
@MachDoch746 ай бұрын
Greetings from the site of the ex AGO Flugzeugwerke Oschersleben
@MrDino19536 ай бұрын
So they tried many versions and they all had “problems”, but we have no idea what they were.
@PeteSampson-qu7qb6 ай бұрын
Um. I'm unaware of a source claiming the 240 was fitted with DB 603's; which just barely entered production in mid 1942.
@krugmeister73014 ай бұрын
A.sad end to that project Aircraft.. But I feel that HEINKEL had it better with the TWIN ENGINE OWL..
@The_armed_Whale6 ай бұрын
Why the Minecraft music at the start 😭
@MrNaKillshots6 ай бұрын
Took long enough, to get it up and running
@AlistairGale6 ай бұрын
Was that a rubber powered model near the end?
@AlistairGale6 ай бұрын
The outsized propellers, the way it seemed to wallow when freewheeling. Not to mention the earlier plainly obvious RC model landing in tall grass.
@ElsinoreRacer4 ай бұрын
"Operational prototype." Is that even a thing? Maybe functional prototype.
@jussi81116 ай бұрын
that cockpit reminds me of the Yak-2/4
@kaletovhangar6 ай бұрын
Also that two wheel landing gear, just like YAK-2/4.
@Jdub65802 ай бұрын
How cool would that be if some Frenchman found it in a barn and restored it to flying condition?