**EARLY ARRIVAL - HEAVY FIRE in Taxpayer** FDNY Battles MAJOR 4-ALARM Fire in Bronx [ Box 2297 ]

[@manny3918]

Just looked them up, this person has a total debt of 12k in parking tickets including multiple fire hydrant tickets, speeding in school zone and bus lane. Looks like they just don't care.

[@FDNYResponseVideos]

It’s actually absurd how many fire hydrant tickets that driver has. Most from the same hydrant and going back multiple years… his car should have been impounded already. This also negates any thought that he was unaware that he was parked too close to the hydrant - he has had years (and thousands of dollars) of warnings.

[@staceynoble2415]

Love you guys. Came from reddit to see why that hard working man was blowing off steam on those there windows. I just refused to believe he was a jerk...lol theres always a reason. ​@FDNYResponseVideos

[@desecration171]

People aren't mad them for busting out some dxckhead's car windows. People are mad at them for WASTING TIME busting out some dxckhead's car windows during a raging fire then using his parking ticket history as some sort of justification for doing so. We were all 12 once. We know malicious vandalism when we see it.

[@szargos]

@@staceynoble2415 Just cuz there's a reason (not a valid reason), does not mean you aren't still a jerk. This was obviously not necessary. If someone gets to the point where they have 12k in parking tickets and that car has not been impounded, then your battle needs to be with someone further up the chain. Think 2 broken windows is gonna stop a guy with 12k in parking tickets from doing this again? Doubt it.

[@RetLtFF43]

@@szargos It’s real simple, don’t park on the hydrant

[@celticviking3150]

OK, at 19:50, was it really necessary to break the cars windows to make the plug hook up? If it was right in front of the hydrant blocking it, I'd completely understand.

[@yojimbo3681]

Nah, it's just a power trip for them.

[@KOBIELWOODS]

FDNY had room

[@JBart3112]

No, it wasn’t. Lousy spot by the chauffeur. Back up 10ft and he’s good. They absolutely had room to make that hydrant without breaking the car windows. They just really wanted to do it. Wonder if his little stunt allowed him room to fix that giant kink.

[@paulzeigler7616]

I understand being frustrated with people parking in front of hydrants, but in this case it was a case of a pissed off fireman going overboard needlessly taking out his anger on someone's car. If you look at the situation. Running the 8" li e through the car windows was stupid, it required two 90 Degree bends causing huge kinks. There is absolutely no reason why with that small car being so low to the ground, he could have easily run the 8" line right up the hood of the car at a nice diagonal gone across the windshield with NO KINKING, THEN just laid the line right across the roof of the csr at a diagonal, ending up right where he needed to be and probably almost at the perfect height off the ground. There would have been no 90 Degree bends. No kinks. The fireman was really being a jerk. He Needlessly wasted a lot of time busting up the car windows.....would have been hooked up and water flowing 2-3 minutes faster without throwing his little hissy fit. Go across the top of the car. Then after the fire, call the city tow and have the car impounded and have the city fine the crap out if the car owner vs. this nonsense.

[@robertszczepaniak8646]

Ten co wybijał szubę to ma małego 😂😂😂

[@Eric-sn4qz]

Great video. Thanks for NO annoying play by play or unnecessary chatter.

[@rickmontgomery3037]

Exactly.

[@jimhardy4750]

All the chatter is coming from all these professional firefighters in here who seem to know the job. They are all ones that want to start at the top and work their way to the bottom!!!

[@josiahtitus]

dang your military career looks crazy, you were army sf and a ranger?

[@vasyapupkin1643]

Firefighter: “Are we going to let water in?” Chief: "No, it will go out on its own")

[@minerran]

I had to investigate what "Taxpayer" is and will share in case you don't know. When someone owns a parcel of land in the city and wants to keep it for a while as an investment to sell later after prop values go up, they often will tear down whatever structure was there and replace it with something minimal that will generate enough income to pay the minimum property taxes such as a small business on the bottom floor with a residence for the owner on the second floor. These are often poorly constructed because its done on the cheap and can be a fire trap. These are a red flag for firefighters who are very aware of them and therefore give these special attention as we see in this video. That's what I learned hope it helps someone.

[@doreenblatz2440]

The way it was told to me is business on the bottom, renters on the top. Renters payments go to taxes for the buildings.

[@FFPM371]

Is this why it appears they do not make entry or much attack until it is more involved and can see the fire? I am not at all critiquing FDNY but I want to learn their strategy.

[@virgilhilts3924]

@@FFPM371 "it appears they do not make entry or much attack" -Both assertions are clearly false

[@tomh3652]

Thanks now that makes sense it lets everyone know its a hazard building to use even more caution. Got it.

[@wilsjane]

@@virgilhilts3924 I think the bulk of the fire was on the second floor spreading from the rear. They were forced to wait until the roof burnt through of the ceiling of the shops collapsed. While the shops had dividing walls, the second floor probably ran the entire length of the terrace. The entire front would have therefore been in danger of collapse without warning. It looked bad to ignore the fire on the first floor, bot there was no way that they could have saved it. Here in the UK, each unit has a continuous dividing wall from ground to roof, so we never see fires spreading sideway.

[@LokirofRoriksted]

Imagine thinking you're lucky that there are 200 firefighters and 20 trucks already waiting, while the shop next door to you is burning, just to watch your shop burns aswell while they're just watching. This felt like getting shot in a hospital bed inside the surgery room and paramedics take you to another hospital 45min away while you bleed to death

[@FDNYResponseVideos]

By the time firefighters arrived all of the stores were on fire. They are all contained within one building and share a common cockloft (space between ceiling and roof) and all had a connected rear area. The fire originated in the rear and spanned the entire length of the building involving each business. In short, the building was a total loss prior to fire department arrival.

[@isaacwinters6954]

@@FDNYResponseVideos As someone going into the academy next January This helps makes sense of what’s happening

[@glennhuber4975]

Obviously you know nothing about firefighting, so I suggest you stop there

[@andrewj.karaffa7080]

They aren't just standing there watching, they are on deck awaiting assignment. We don't just show up and do shit, that's called freelancing and it gets us killed. As crews come out for new air bottles, those others go in.

[@DanielStephens-yn4bw]

How about you keep everything to yourself? How about you explain it mate? ​@@glennhuber4975

[@ls60fd]

I love the use of drones to get a birdseye view of the fire scene. I always thought this would be a perfect for the fire service when drone first became widely available and cheaper.

[@GubiYoroi]

i think they do use drones but mostly for take out fire i think i saw drone shoot water

[@RaceBanner_]

Batt. Chief: “Fire is doubtful” Fire: “Oh I’ll make you a believer”

[@82fdny97]

That’s what doubtful is

[@lynnecromack4933]

OK, don't get the hose routing through a car @19:30. Ideas ?? They've made the job harder by looks..

[@Blizzyy16]

Yeah maybe I’m missing something but could they have put it on top of the car?

[@finderlifebound6961]

@@Blizzyy16 Or behind it, or in front of it.. Guy had a temper tantrum for some reason.

[@celticviking3150]

If the car was right in front of the hydrant, break away. But, the car was legally parked. That's going to cost the city some change.

[@jamiekeno8487]

They write the law to protect themselves, car isn't 15ft away, city isn't going to be in trouble

[@jaysunbrady]

What Would happen If It slipped down? And going around the car puts links in which lower the pressure how about just don't park 15 feet in front of a hydrant like the law states.​@@finderlifebound6961

[@EMJE272]

Are FDNY members ordered not to put water on fires?

[@cornelfrancis7615]

If you have crews working inside a building, you do not want a crew outside with a line pumping water inside at the same time because it may worsen the conditions for the crew carrying out an interior attack.

[@rj4590]

@@cornelfrancis7615 It's JB917 in disguise...

[@simonschuster3967]

​@@cornelfrancis7615Das ist korrekt, aber bei diesen Verhälltnissen im Gebäude (der Rauch kurz vor der Durchzündung) war bestimmt keiner mehr drinn!!! Das kann mir niemand erzählen... und deswegen fragte ich mich auch, warum alle zuschauen und nicht von aussen löschen... In der Schweiz wird ein Eskalieren der Situation oder ein aus-oder abbrennen eines Gebäudes möglichst verhindert!! Und dies mit allen möglichen Mitteln, die in diesem Fall ja bereit gestanden sind!! Gruss aus der CH

[@RetLtFF43]

You on the job?

[@cornelfrancis7615]

@@rj4590 Thank you sir, he just can't help himself.😂😂😂😂😂

[@BenBrown-c2h]

Then car wasn't even blocking the hydrant though? That was a ridiculous overreaction

[@shawnweaver8091]

@@BenBrown-c2h yup and I am sure the tax payer is footing the bill for it.

[@jimothy138]

yeah, this was totally unnessesary.

[@leoengl9130]

In Germany, the firefighter would probably receive a significant fine and professional consequences for the action.

[@csx2183]

The intake for the supply was on the front of the truck, due to possible spacing issues the truck could not back up, so they had to smash it to avoid kinking of the hose as much as possible, so yes it was possibly justified.

[@joe8374]

I absolutely love to see the FDNY in action at these large scale events. Just terrific work and how connected the crews are all together. Great work and thanks for sharing for our pleasure.

[@nitroxph]

Maybe wait untill the whole block lit up.

[@GubiYoroi]

i kinda wonder to why they wait sometimes could be for shady reason or for safety ?

[@anastasiabee3843]

@@GubiYoroisafety. Another post above explains the term they use for the building, taxpayer, and replies give more info on why they couldnt go in until the roof collapsed.

[@antizoom6855]

@doomed-y3s Noice sarcasm

[@basspig]

It seems counterproductive to be running the fire hose through the automobile windows. It would seem just as easy to run the hose over the car or around it.

[@manschopanscho.]

at 20:54 you can see the natural curve the hose wants to take and the kinks he created by running it thru the car.

[@melhupby]

@@manschopanscho. That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard.

[@TYSuggested]

Yeah that took a lot of time. Looks like they do it just to prove a point here. That hose would have been fine just laying over the hood or the roof of that car.

[@greyman686]

Or backed the rig up a few feet and had free access to the hydrant.

[@jarenagra2804]

he decided to be his good ol' asshole self.

[@AZAce1064]

Putting the hose through the car, what in the hell is the purpose of that!

[@greyman686]

To make a point, an unnecessary one in this case.

[@Nash1a]

@@greyman686 And waste time... don't forget that.

[@fp7713]

to make sure some water will get there as well

[@boolikethebear]

Never in my life have I heard someone say fuck the fire department - until today.

[@originalbigmike]

I say it every time they shut down traffic to park the ladder tuck after using it for a grocery run.

[@RetLtFF43]

@@originalbigmike Oh so sorry, how are they to shop for their meal?

[@originalbigmike]

@@RetLtFF43 in literally any other vehicle. Take the battalion chief's SUV.

[@RetLtFF43]

@@originalbigmikeOh, so every firehouse has a Battalion Chief Car?

[@RetLtFF43]

@@originalbigmikeAnd what is the Battalion Chief suppose to use to respond to fires and other incidents in the response area?

[@ronfreniere8769]

Hopefully there were no injuries to anyone related to this incident. Thank you to all firefighters everywhere for protecting the citizens of your coverage area.

[@yojimbo3681]

Fire Fighters' IQ dropped that day.

[@manschopanscho.]

me eat much smoke, me eat little air, head no work so good

[@Sneaky_Blaze]

That looked completely unnecessary, such a power trip

[@awepossum1059]

Just goes to show in any job where people have power, there are going to be people who have power trips. Not just police, but also firefighters.

[@AwesomeRepix]

Officially the worst fire fighters I've ever seen.. That was.. wat.

[@AzderielBane]

When a cop becomes a firefighter

[@MarkJohnson-us4sh]

LOL best comment 😂

[@ConnorRoss]

in general firefighters are way more like cops than people think. they just don't have as many chance to shoot people.

[@blackrock6278]

Jesus...the time it took Pugsly to bust out those windows, he could have properly ran that hose instead of running it like it was his first day on the job. Prime example of why people are developing a negative view of first responders.

[@farrenzoroqueez]

In fact, it would have been a lot easier to run the hose behind the car so it doesn’t bunch up when the water flows through it. He wanted to destroy a window. Dumbass.

[@greyman686]

Dude could have literally backed the engine up 5 feet and had completely clear access to it.

[@sprybug]

Omg 😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@crew-dog2668]

Why was he wearing gym shoes? Unprofessional.

[@Munter247]

The car is technically illegally parked. But they could have hooked up without breaking the windows in this specific case

[@TheSwayzeee]

They did that to prove a point. Parking is very limited, but for some reason no one respects the fire hydrants. 😅

[@scampsboytes9088]

@@TheSwayzeee It still lacked good sense, chance to cut the hose, just lay it around the car, have a citation written on the car. Really lessened respect for the fire department.

[@Jerrynyc424]

@@scampsboytes9088you never worked in Bronx FD? The frustration theses FF have to deal with double parked cars snd cars blocking hydrants all the time ?

[@SBayne762]

@@scampsboytes9088 The material of the window is not sharp enough to cut the hose. And the hose needs to have both the least quantity of bends, and the least angle in the bends that do have to exist. Going through the car accomplishes this for the pressure of water needed to reach the truck. But you know, keep your jackass opinion to yourself.

[@marumiyuhime]

@@scampsboytes9088 what you saw will occur anywhere in the us if you are parked in front of a fire hydrent and they need the water guy should be happy its not a webnet/braided hose still used by many depts and they leak.

[@billjenkins687]

I have NEVER seen so many guys standing around with their hands in their pockets.

[@Sean-C]

only in the US...they rather watch the building burned to the ground than put out the fire. Remember water is very expensive here in the US because of climate change.

[@azranger7294]

Uvalde had a few more guys I think

[@Borntobreach]

​@Sean-C that's not why they're standing around, the creator posted another comment somewhere explaining that the build was a total loss and it would be unsafe to go interior

[@jimrussell5728]

How ironic " The Blaze Smoke Shop" up in flames 😂

[@shawnweaver8091]

The car window smashing was totally unneeded there.

[@Edoubleyt]

So was the car parked there.

[@greyman686]

@@Edoubleyt Perhaps, doesn't change that there was virtually no reason to smash his window.

[@shawnweaver8091]

@@Edoubleyt yes the car was parked illegally, that doesn't justify smashing the windows. The hose had to take a more extreme angle to go through the window than it would have to go in front of the car.

[@k9spjack]

I guarantee you that Mr. Fester wouldn't have been so eager to break those car windows if HE had to pay for the damage. As just because they can justify breaking the windows, doesn't mean that they should. And based on the overwhelming majority of Firefighters standing around watching the fire burn, it was obvious that exigent circumstances DIDN'T exist to justify breaking the cars windows!

[@royvankan2723]

What the… Is there really no other way to get around that car instead of through it? It definitely doesn’t make any sense to me. It looks almost like a sensation seeker. I’m aware you need to create some space around a fire hydrant. But his? I feel bad for the store owners though.

[@bobvidoni5898]

It was in Backdraft so some guys copy it thinking they are "legally" teaching a lesson, although in Vancouver a fireman who did that had to pay for the damage to the car when the owner took the city to court.

[@choppermike3329]

@@bobvidoni5898 They have been doing that long before Backdraft.

[@SBayne762]

No. You're a bleeding heart.

[@cavemanyogi150]

@@bobvidoni5898 as should this little manlet. Unnecessary, could have went over the car or pulled the truck up a few feet. Wasted time in the situation and should be held accountable for the damage.

[@travelingman3579]

@@cavemanyogi150right, the hose could have sat in the same path that he ran around the car 2x

[@jimrussell5728]

Fire fighter taking out his frustration on the Honda's windows 😅

[@Nash1a]

Overcompensating for his own inadequacy!

[@adamlea6339]

I wondered why he did that instead of running the hose on the ground around the front of the car which if anything looked an easier routing. I'm not familiar with U.S. parking restrictions but I'm guessing the car was illegally parked and partially obstructing the hydrant, in which case the firefighter should have used that blunt instrument on the driver's head.

[@nvus2758]

Widely known in NYC, you block a hydrant, you get the leaky hose passed through your vehicle.

[@Nash1a]

@@nvus2758 But he wasn't. Yes he was near a hydrant. Yes he deserved to be fined. But this is vigilantly justice and ILLEGAL. The hose could have made a shorter path going straight to the truck instead of through the car.

[@joscallinet6260]

The Smokeshop on the front side of the taxpayer was truly living up to its name!

[@MUFCXI]

Not condoning the parking job, but why couldn’t they FD not just go around the front of the car to connect the hose?

[@notsure7874]

Because they're more concerned with "teaching them a lesson" than putting out fires.

[@greyman686]

Or back the engine up a few feet and be completely clear.

[@jarenagra2804]

he think's he's an alpha male. this is his way of being a passive aggressive bitch, because, why stop at smashing windows?

[@teambedburg]

What does the fire department actually do for a living?

[@Mr150bandit]

Need to call out more Firemen, so the 40 firemen STANDING AROUND WATCHING THE FIRE WILL HAVE SOMEONE TO TALK TO !!!

[@ryrocks9487]

@doomed-y3s Or you could live in Europe and have people on FD's too scared to search.

[@Borntobreach]

Go find the comment explaining what a taxpayer is

[@timothyjohnson4885]

That blazin smoke shop is for sure blazing

[@tucobenedicto109]

Notice the crystal ball.

[@rj4590]

Maybe where the smokin blaze started.

[@lollipop84858]

What was your first clue?

[@georgecoons6872]

i think the dummy in the window is smarter then its stands. NOMEX NEW LOOK..

[@csalerno7472]

I guess if there's anything good to come from this is that it was now in the morning and not during the extreme heat coming this afternoon.

[@christophercosentino3192]

up here where I am in Canada, you can not park within 5 meters of a hydrant or it's a $156.00 fine.

[@timmied8461]

I see that car is illegally parked, it's too close to the hydrant! BUT COME ON. It would have been the same angle if he had gone over the hood with that line! That was totally uncalled for!!! They would be receiving a call from my attorney in the morning! The video is the proof!

[@inothome]

Waa... waaa.. don't ever park next to a hydrant, period. Call your "attorney" all you want. lol

[@bobvidoni5898]

In Vancouver, a fireman did that. The owner took the city to court and the fireman had to pay for the damage, although the driver was fined CAD$100 for parking too close to a hydrant.

[@inothome]

@@bobvidoni5898 But you also probably don't have an many a-holes blocking hydrants in Canada either. US is full of them.

[@timmied8461]

@@bobvidoni5898 Yes, thank you Bob, and he should have been fined $100., but the damage that was done to that car , along with the inside damage could be over five grand! The guy probably has insurance, but he will still have to pay the deductible, maybe $1000. bucks!

[@timmied8461]

@@inothome Whoever parked that car there, is an asshole and should be ticketed, but the fireman didn't have to go through the windows, it was just as easy to go over the hood! That fireman took it upon himself to punish that guy, and that"s not right!!!

[@MrBigbonzai]

19:30 why on earth are they placing the hose through the car?

[@greyman686]

They wanted to be big and bad an made an point, for whatever reason.

[@dragonsong1023]

Not an early arrival, if the fire got to be a MAJOR 4-ALARM Fire. With that many trucks and manpower there at the start, that fire shouldn't have got to 4 ALARM. Who ever was in charge, screwed that one up.

[@FDNYResponseVideos]

Early arrival indicates that the video begins early in the operation. In this case, 15 minutes after the first 911 call. The fire was well advanced upon arrival and was a loss before the fire department even arrived.

[@SweetBack1946]

Overall, I think they did a great job! I also think the firefighter who busted out that car window to run that hose line from the front of that pumper to the fire hydrant is an a-hole! He could have back that truck up and hook that hose attachment. Ok. The legal argument may be the car was not 50 feet from that fire hydrant. I got that. I just saw an alternative way to do it. Again, all props to everyone who knocked this fire down. It's that one guy who lit my fuse. 1965, Ship Firefighter School ("Smoke Eater")

[@BobbyBoca]

18:35 The car definitely should have not been parked there but no need to break the window that is just stupidly! Cleary he can hooked up putting the line over the roof of the car and would have been good .

[@Bradley38]

No safety gear at all. He probably didn't want to take the time to put some on so that nobody else beat him to the window breaking wet dream.

[@BobbyBoca]

@@Bradley38 100%

[@PeterShaw-lb9lt]

they can't those 4 inch hoses full of water can not be bent on an angle it will restrict the water flow it was the drivers fault it is illegle to park in front of a hydrant the extra time taken can effect the outcome for the fire the driver will also get a fine for parking there the car driver is a moron fighters

[@BobbyBoca]

Agreed illegal to park by hydrant but 20:55 yes this kinks will open up but it would have been much easier to lay the line over the windshield and roof of the car this ,chauffeur was waiting for this day to break a window like this …

[@Bradley38]

@@PeterShaw-lb9lt Two things can be wrong at the same time

[@Konrad_BER]

Why did they wait so long to delete it? 18:45 And why was the car's window broken? The Schlau could really have been placed around or over the car. :-(

[@wombatcitystudios]

they didn't have to smash the car windows for the hose to get to the hydrant, very overdramatic

[@rly1977]

I'm not a firefighter but it appears to me that way too, I feel like the hose could have been looped over the car but what do I know. It also looks to me, that at that hose angle, a car could have been parked one car length up, right next to the hydrant and the hose would just go behind the car.

[@BadMannerKorea]

@@rly1977 So let me get this straight---you're not a firefighter, you've provided zero sources, and it's quite obvious you have no relevant education and are too lazy to find credible information, but you know what a firefighter is doing is wrong? Makes sense /s

[@Mike-at-Play]

Yeah that for sure wasn't necessary. Running the hose through the vehicle didn't make it better than going under, behind or over would have.

[@tonytrinh4990]

Do your eyes work? See the kinks in the hose from feeding it through the car? I'm not defending the parking but that whole thing was just stupid to prove a point.

[@BadMannerKorea]

@@tonytrinh4990 Maybe it was, but you aren't the court system. You're a goofy Redditor pretending to be a lawyer or a judge who presides over the case. If it was wrong then the court system will decide, not you, but there are reasons for why it's done.

[@zyglo9826]

With all those huge fires in NY, it amazes me that there’s anything left to burn.

[@EMJE272]

the way FDNY works, it amazing the city doesn't look like the old south bronx of the 70's. Guess we should thank God for sprinklers and updated building codes

[@FDNYResponseVideos]

⁠@@EMJE272it may be prudent to consider that the fire videos you see in any given year represent less than .1% of all fires that the FDNY responded to. The vast majority of fire incidents are extinguished quickly, without incident and with no representation on KZbin or the news. The fires that you DO see are the rare exception in which fire conditions have significantly extended throughout hard-to-reach void spaces and have subsequently severely compromised building safety. Food for thought.

[@wilsjane]

@@FDNYResponseVideos What you say is absolutely true. With such poor building regulations and compliance, you can end up losing the battle before you start. We have a joke here in the UK. English architects design buildings, American architects design bonfires. Compared with what you have to do, London firefighters have the easiest job on the planet.

[@andrewthies7313]

@@wilsjane perhaps brush up on the IFC

[@gleebybooer]

@@FDNYResponseVideosI wouldnt trust you given how you thought you had to break through that car to attach the hose 😂

[@frankpritz6997]

Seems like he did that to make a point. With the length of 5" supply line they had he could have gone over the trunk or roof of the car. But because they went through it, it wound up partially kinked.

[@bobvidoni5898]

...and compromised water supply. But guys like that don't have a Ph.D.

[@RoseMadrid-e5t]

🥞THE GOSPEL OF THE WORD OF ALMIGHTY GOD "the last age in which God is saving man from the imminent destruction of this old world" (Can the name Jesus--"God with us"--represent the whole disposition of God? Can it clearly describe God? God may be called by many names, but by these names, no one can fathom the fullness of God, no one can fully represent God. Man has only a limited vocabulary available to summarize all he knows about God's disposition: great, revered, mysterious, unfathomable, supreme, divine, righteous, wise, etc. There are so many words! God is so great! God is so holy! God is so lovable! One particular word or name is incapable of representing God in His entirety, so do you think His name can be made permanent? God is so great and so holy, but you won't let Him change His name in every new age? Therefore, in each age that God personally carries out His own work, He uses a name appropriate to the age to sum up the work He intends to do. This is God's use of human language to express His own disposition. There is no single name that can sum up God's disposition, and there is no single name that can describe all that God is and is. If someone asks Me. "What name do You really use? I will say to them, "God is God!" The day will come when God will no longer be called Jehovah, Jesus, or the Messiah--He will be called the Creator.) Almighty God said Can the NAME JESUS---"GOD with US"---represent the WHOLE DISPOSITION of GOD? Can it CLEARLY EXPLAIN GOD? If man SAYS that GOD can only be NAMED JESUS, and CANNOT HAVE any other NAME because GOD CANNOT CHANGE His DISPOSITION, those WORDS are indeed BLASPHEMY against GOD! Do you BELIEVE the NAME JESUS, GOD with US, can ALONE REPRESENT GOD in His WHOLENESS? GOD can be CALLED by different NAMES, but among these NAMES, NO ONE can contain the WHOLENESS of GOD, NO ONE can fully REPRESENT GOD. ☀️ And so, GOD has many NAMES, but these NAMES CANNOT COMPLETELY EXPRESS GOD'S DISPOSITION, because GOD'S DISPOSITION is VERY ABUNDANT and EXCEEDS MAN'S ABILITY to KNOW Him. There is NO WAY for MAN, using MAN'S LANGUAGE, to COMPLETELY SUMMARIZE God. 🙏 MAN has ONLY a LIMITED VOCABULARY AVAILABLE to SUMMARIZE all he KNOWS about GOD'S DISPOSITION: GREAT, REVERED, MYSTERIOUS, UNFATHOMABLE, SUPREME, HOLY, RIGHTEOUS, WISE, and so on. So MANY WORDS! 🙏💐 This limited vocabulary is incapable of describing how little man has witnessed of God's disposition. Later, many people added words that they felt could better describe the fire in their hearts: GOD is GREAT! GOD is VERY HOLY! GOD is so lovely! 🙏 At present, man's sayings like this have reached their peak, but man still lacks the ability to express himself clearly. And so, for MAN, GOD has MANY NAMES, but He does NOT have ONE NAME, and that is because His being GOD is TOO Abundant, and MAN'S LANGUAGE is too poor. ☀️ A particular word or name is incapable of representing God in His entirety, so do you think His name can be made permanent? GOD is so great and so holy, but you WON'T LET Him change His NAME EVERY NEW AGE? ☀️ Therefore, in EVERY TIME GOD PERSONALLY DOES HIS OWN WORK, He USES A NAME appropriate to the TIME to sum up the WORK HE intends to DO. He USES this particular NAME, one that HAS TEMPORARY SIGNIFICANCE, to REPRESENT His DISPOSITION at that TIME. ☀️🙏 This is GOD'S USE OF HUMAN LANGUAGE to EXPRESS HIS OWN DISPOSITION. 🙏 However, many people who have had spiritual experiences and personally seeing God still feel that this particular name is incapable of representing God in His entirety--unfortunately, it cannot be contained--so it is not that man calls God by any name, but simply calls Him "GOD." ☀️ The human heart seems to be full of love, but it also seems to be surrounded by contradictions, because man does not know how to explain God. WHAT GOD is is SO Abundant, that there is absolutely NO WAY to DESCRIBE it. There is NO single NAME that can sum up GOD'S DISPOSITION, and NO single NAME can DESCRIBE ALL that is and what GOD is. 🙏 If anyone ASKS Me. "What exactly is the name You use?" I WILL TELL them, "God is God!" 🙏 Isn't THAT the best NAME for GOD? Isn't that the BEST assimilation of GOD'S DISPOSITION? So why do you spend so much effort searching for God's name? Why would you think so intensely, without eating and sleeping, just for a name? The DAY WILL COME that GOD WILL NO LONGER BE CALLED JEHOVAH, JESUS, or the MESSIAH---He WILL ONLY BE CALLED the CREATOR. 💐🙏 At that TIME, ALL the NAMES He USED on EARTH WILL END, because His WORK on EARTH is OVER, AFTER that, He WILL HAVE NO NAMES. ☀️ When ALL THINGS are UNDER the RULE of the CREATOR, why would He NEED to have SO many appropriate but incomplete names? Are you still SEEKING GOD'S NAME today? Do you still dare to SAY GOD and just CALL JEHOVAH? Do you still dare to SAY that GOD CAN ONLY BE CALLED JESUS? Can you endure the SIN of blasphemy? You MUST KNOW that GOD in the BEGINNING has NO NAME. He only used one or two, or many names because He has a WORK to DO and He needs to RULE HUMANITY. Whatever NAME He is CALLED, is it NOT He CHOOSE FREELY? Would He NEED you---one of His creatures--to decide this? ☀️ The NAME by which GOD is CALLED conforms to WHAT MAN CAN UNDERSTAND, in MAN'S LANGUAGE, but this NAME is NOT a THING MAN CAN UNDERSTAND. ☀️ You can only say that there is a God in heaven, that He is called God, that He is God Himself with great power, who is so wise, so great, so wonderful, so mysterious, and so almighty, and then you have nothing more to say; that's all you can know. Because of this, can the mere name Jesus represent God Himself? When the LAST DAYS COME, even though GOD is still DOING His WORK, His NAME mush CHANGE, because it is a NEW AGE. 🙏 The Word, vol.1. The Manifestation and Work of God. The Vision of God's Work 3" Fulfilled of (Ezekiel 2:9-10). (Rev. 19:13). 📥Calling and leading everyone to His lowered Kingdom or Church because it is still standing on earth in the holy place in the air/ youtube "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD 💐 this is the fulfillment of what He said to Peter 2,000 years ago, recorded in (Matthew 16:18'19). This is the the only Church of each one of our spirit that we must listen to or eat and drink like how we eat, dress and sleep every day so that He can guide us and change us by rejecting the evil attached by satan so as to be perfect, having attained eternal life that will enter the coming replacement of the New Heaven and New Earth. 💌

[@goldengaming7036]

@@bobvidoni5898And the friction loss could’ve been a part of what the other gentleman said. Lot of factors that people don’t think of it’s basic physics lol

[@skycarp2002]

In another video posted by a fire photographer the scene is different. The engine is backed up and connected to the same hydrant with the hose laying in the street. The car is shown with the broken windows. Seem like someone forced common sense upon the company.

[@goldengaming7036]

@@skycarp2002 unknown I guess

[@bagelburgling]

"Heavy fire in taxpayer" what the fuck does this even mean. This road is a tax payer?

[@anastasiabee3843]

Another comment explains. Interesting info too and tells why they had to wait so long to go in.

[@ericlyh091]

Not gonna lie, I think that it is nesscary to break the car window as if the hose goes around the car rather than in a straight line, the water pressure will be lost, which means the water will come out slower, which may also affect the distance the water can be sprayed. Also the fire truck is very close to the car. If it is placed on the hood, the angle of bending when attached to the fire truck will be too large. So the hose going through the car window is the best solution. In emergencies, only the most optimized solution can be chosen.

[@empyreanparadiso]

bro smashed that car window cause he wanted to look tough in front of the cameraman LMAOOO

[@sargashcontola2874]

Bro smashed that window because it couldn't go over the car or under the car so it had to go through the car. They gotta do it all the fucking time and it's just annoying.

[@user-fl3ls4np8t]

Um.. no. He literally needed to to reach properly so the hoze would not bend or kink preventing water flow.

[@Caboosejaja]

you're dense, or blind 😂🤡

[@williamberryhill2651]

We're you watching the same video? The hose they have routed through the car has more bends and kinks than if it was routed in front. Just because one fire crew is being called out for do something unsavory doesn't mean all fire crews are being attacked.

[@M4r10h]

He could have routed the hose over the car with minimal damage to it and less hose bend. Fireman was looking for an anger outlet

[@billkaku1283]

It would be better to directly connect the hose from the roof of the car to the fire hydrant, right?

[@demonracer2]

Great coverage all around!

[@Hinocala]

Logistically would the back passenger window have been better to break so the hose could pass through without the sharp turns ?

[@greyman686]

Logistically, and he later did it, he could have backed up 5 or 10 feet and had easy access to the hydrant. When they charged this line, he ended up with the two massive kinks which isn't overly effective.

[@tidenhub71]

18:58 - Absolutely ridiculous and totally unnecessary. This is just about showing who has the power. The hose can be placed around the car without any problems. Yes, the car is parked incorrectly, but it is not so obstructive that the hose has to be put through the car.

[@greyman686]

He also could have just backed up.

[@plansandprocrastination]

So, I would love a fireman to come on here, and explain why I'm 8 minutes in and with scores of firemen around, it just looks like it keeps getting worse and everyone is just milling around. Is it just the camera angle? Is there any water on this yet?

[@BRM-dk3tf]

In this video, you can only see one area at a time. This fire presumably originated in the row of retail stores (side 1). Side 2 was an attached multi-story multi family dwelling. Side 3 was the back side of a row of attached single family dwellings. Side 4 was fenced off. Fires in urban settings sometimes must be attacked from multiple sides, this is one of those times. Initial crews were offensive (hose lines stretched and operating inside the fire building). You can’t see those companies because they are working inside and on top of the buildings. The members that look as if they are standing around are awaiting assignment. At this incident, a critical safety observation was made that the fire building was separating at the masonry joints indicating pending collapse. Command pulled all interior companies out of the fire building and off the roof. They simultaneously had companies trying to access the number 3 side (which had to be done by forcing entry on the private dwellings and advancing lines through them to attack the fire and prevent the homes from burning. Simultaneously, several companies were working in and on the number 2 exposure to check and prevent extension. The strategic change from offensive to defensive required the removal of the ladder trucks and for them to be replaced with tower ladders. Once in position, engine companies had to reposition to supply the tower ladders and the 4 multi-verses (ground based deck guns). There is a period after any strategic change that requires a withdrawal from a fire building for the command to conduct an accountability check and make sure every member is out of the building and accounted for. During that time, it can appear as nothing is happening, but we simply have to account for all the members operating. At the FDNY, there should always be companies visible outside of a working incident. These members are the next to be assigned to a function, and serve as a human shield should the incident suddenly escalate (explosions, collapse, fire growth, and extension). Only the largest fire departments have the staffing and manpower to place that many firemen on scene. Those departments have learned the hard way that not having those members standing by can be catastrophic. I would also add that the vehicle parking on side 1 added to the difficulties. Those vehicles were parked where the defensive members would have operated their hose lines from. That’s not to blame those drivers, those appeared to be legally parked cars in designated parking spots. Remember, fire codes can only go so far. Probably the best example of that is the vehicle that DID park illegally and obstruct one of the hydrants needed during this operation. Hope that helped.

[@EMJE272]

There was NO firefighting for several minutes. FDNY always seems to allow things to build up

[@dougs4944]

​@@BRM-dk3tfYou nailed the response...👍

[@jamesstark8316]

Awesome and measured response. Thank you. Odd that I never see any of these arm chair fire chiefs on the nozzle in any of these FDNY videos.

[@bobclavile5653]

Until you've actually been a firefighter, and understand the real answers to your questions. Sometimes it's just better to KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT, rather than prove your ignorance.

[@joenewman6939]

13 minutes in and they finally pull out a second hose wow fellas

[@FDNYResponseVideos]

Blatantly false buddy boi

[@lelo3961]

Always like that...

[@물붕]

사다리차가 중간에 왜 교체됩니까? 미국은 인명구조용 사다리차와 방수용 사다리차가 별도로 운용됩니까?

[@ConfederateHokie]

Report from Engine Co 82.......... Here's your water :-D :-D Love that chauffeur !!

[@klausjansen2121]

I am a German Firefighter . In Min. 19.00 this i never seen in Germany. The NY Firrfighter , he destroy the Window both Side. Very good Job. Jetzt auf deutsch . Das ist ein tolles Video , der Brand ist aber auch nicht zu verachten, soviel Brandlast und dann 4 VIER Geschäfte die brennen . Wie kann sowas passieren , haben die Holzwände als Zwischenwände, da muss man ja noch aufpassen das dieser Brand nicht noch auf Nebenhäuser übergreift oder Fahrzeuge in Mitleidenschaft gezogen werden. Guter Bericht und Gruß aus Germany /NRW Nähe Köln.

[@xbnlf]

That's because across Europe, the first mission is to do as little collateral damage as possible. So the they won't destroy someone's car because they're too lazy to stretch out a longer hose.

[@mowglikorf2913]

Breaking the windows of that car, completely unnecessary. That is just frustration, the hose could easy go in front or behind the car.

[@Pops-b4e]

Agree 100% a better setup was clearly available in front of the car! NYFD just being JERKS while half the man power standing around with their thumbs up their asses until things get totally out of control, seen it over and over and over again!

[@Bradley38]

@@Pops-b4e Firefighters acting like cops. I would encourage any firefighter to be better than this. Don't be a dick.

[@xheralt]

@@Pops-b4e They pulled their rig too far forward, then used the bumper inlet when there was an alternative inlet available 19:10 almost directly in line of the hydrant with open access between the bollards.

[@MrTimeless101]

yep.

[@gorak9000]

@@Bradley38 But if they didn't act like dicks, how would they earn the title "fire dicks"??

[@awill891]

I'm a Californian and always want to see real life streets of New York in 4K. But not just a "walking tour" type of videos, I want to see real life things going on. And I never know what to search to find that on KZbin. I think I finally found it!

[@apple_barns4719]

This isnˋt real, is it? Please tell me, it is slapstick. The way they put the hose through the car is probably a joke. I last saw something like that with Stan and Ollie. And how they all stand around comfortably like at a party. The only thing missing is the cocktail. Oh no, Marshmallows! And meanwhile the fire gets bigger and bigger. But hey, they punished the owner of the car. Biggest success of the day.

[@cluckhead1913]

The developers are licking their chops over this one.

[@manschopanscho.]

the guy smashing the windows is a complete muppet took him three times as long to do a worse job laying the hose with 5 kinks in it... power trip much?

[@explodingdog]

He should've been a cop with this attitude

[@notsure7874]

And you have people in here crying about how they have to do this because "muh kinks in hoses, and muh straight lines for the better water flows, so YES THEY HAD TO ..." As if throwing the hose over the hood in this case isn't a much straighter shot, with no bends, kinks, or time wasted smashing out windows to "teach them a lesson".

[@greyman686]

@@notsure7874 Or just back the rig up. 82 was the 6th in engine, I don't think things were going to shit anymore than they already were if he took a second to back up.

[@Suzuki_Akira]

I love the video work always in these videos!❤ Serious question, I understand the illegal parking issue, however I am curious that is the broken glass not a potential hazard for the hose vs just going over or under the vehicle?

[@greyman686]

Or backing the rig up a few feet.

[@rolfsinkgraven]

A big one again, great footage thnx.

[@countrystorm1005]

Me being a firefighter for 24 years….. yup that supply line doesn’t need to go through the car. The car is not blocking the hydrant and they created more friction loss than what was needed doing it that way.

[@Dbodell8000]

Love how they let things progress. Gotta put a good show on for the public and the news camera's.

[@olbricky6824]

This might be a noob question but what is with the titles of these videos having "taxpayer" in them?? Is it a NYC thing or..??

[@jurgenfranzke8981]

Dieser Feuerwehreinsatz ist an Lächerlichkeit kaum noch zu überbieten . Fehlt nur noch dass die Löschknechte sich ein Bier aufmachen und sich im Feuer Würstchen grillen .😭

[@obineg5752]

Wichtig ist vor allem, den Schlauch durch das falsch geparkte Auto zu stecken, auch wenn das eine kontraproduktive Wirkung im Hinblick auf das Einsatzgeschehen hat, weil das dann zu Knoten führt. Möglichst viel kaputtzumachen ist oberstes Gebot!

[@helenadrumz]

Is there a reason nobody's putting out the fire, or is this a NY thing?

[@exeexecutor]

They want someone to pay first then they release the water - capitalism is so good!

[@Squad61]

Isn't there an pump inlet on the officers side? Why connect it to the front, just to justify breaking the car windows next to he fire hydrant? The twists in the hose made a good waterflow not possible. So many questions. Why, why why ? Just because you can, and the car was to close to the hydrant?

[@xheralt]

There was an alternative inlet almost directly in line with the hydrant 19:10 , in line with the open space between the bollards marking/protecting the hydrant. They deliberately _chose_ to not use it.

[@MrTimeless101]

plenty of space in front the car.

[@greyman686]

Funny part is, he could have backed up and had much better access, which he eventually did and can be seen in themajesteriums version of this fire. All that stupidity of breaking the windows when he could have taken and a moment and done what he eventually did.

[@ForestNinjaZero]

The image of an astronaut carrying bud might be a clue as to why the smoke shop was blazin. Whatever they're selling sends the customer into space! 🤣

[@nickhalden3616]

COULD NOT go over the top of that car HAD to destroy it and cause damage

[@davehendricks7023]

The epitome of fafo

[@joegaito702]

Even by fdny and NYPD responding as always excellent outstanding brilliant they deserve alot of credit tons of it let's honor and appreciate the paramedics and firemen and police who proudly serve us your service and time and efforts are deeply appreciated even by fdny and NYPD responding great job great team work and great and sweet catches as usual still going strong great team efforts are deeply appreciated stay safe and warm out there stay strong and healthy as well much love and respect and appreciation job well done you should be proud really enjoyed and appreciate the vidoes please keep them safe out there and coming a big thanks to everyone who responds and works around the clock to keep us safe out there way to go very impressed way to go !!! Joe 😅😊😊😊😊

[@MLSPlatforms]

Do they not own more than 1 hose ?

[@MikeWilson75]

No, it's okay. You're outside, no need to wear your mask in the smoke.

[@kjbigsful]

Does the color of the smoke tell what's burning?

[@bobvidoni5898]

Yes, and also how hot the fire is and whether it is being dampened down.

[@kjbigsful]

@@bobvidoni5898 Good to know, thank you!

[@PaulDean-y5o]

Why do firefighters in the US not put water straight on the fire they can see? They are literally standing there watching those buildings burn down 😮 So different from the rest of the world. This isn't having a go at the firefighters. It's a genuine question.

[@sicksonethree]

Because most cities and departments aren't like the FDNY, and it's also why the FDNY are amongst the most respected departments in the world. Most FD's are trained to (for the most part) hit a fire from the outside, push the flames inward to the structure and drown it with water. While this may be safer for firefighters, it increases structural damage and can make things more dangerous to crews or people inside. FDNY, on the other hand, are trained to aggressively attack a fire from the inside of a structure and push it outwards. It's gutsy and more dangerous for the crews, but it has been shown to be effective in putting fires out quicker and with less damage. What you don't see in most videos is the huge host of firefighters fighting the fire from inside the building. There's also the unique structural designs of NYC that play into this ''inside-out'' style of attack. NY being one of the most densely populated cities in the world, full of old tenements, bodegas, dilapidated buildings etc. that you won't find anywhere else in the world (all of which seemingly love to catch fire) plays a big role into how the FDNY fights fires.

[@jconde854]

Cause all firemen are idiots 😂😂😂

[@Benjamin-in5ef]

There all just standing in groups and looking 👀

[@GamingLoreReader]

Don't worry. These are highly trained firefighters. Noticed how they contained the fire and it didn't spread out more? They aren't just standing around and watching. They are waiting for the strategic planning on how to take the fire out with minimal structural damage. They know what they are doing despite it looking confusing to ordinary people who are not trained or educated in fighting fires.

[@mkeonfiremagazine4673]

@@sicksonethreeyou typed all that for nothing.. nobody respects the New York fire department 🤣🤣🤣

[@c1c4d4d4c1c]

It did not make any sense to smash those car windows, they could have placed it over the car. The US really has stupid ass firefighters.

[@anracc5302]

really glad you spent unnessicary time destroying a guys car for no reason rather than doing your fucking job

[@cavemanyogi150]

public minions think they can do whatever, because they get away with bullshit like this plus wayyyyy worse daily.

[@Juice-re6id]

maybe you should get out there and show them how it's done

[@ZMonster01]

@@Juice-re6id Don’t need to be a firefighter to see the massive kink in the hose caused by routing it through the car. Dude was just being an ass.

[@greyman686]

@@Juice-re6id Most people would probably have enough sense to run the line either around the back of the car, or back the truck up (which is what eventually happened anyway) and run it in front of the car.

[@ME-on8by]

so why don't they put the hose over the top of the car?

[@nathan-qcueparsons268]

18:48 😂 That's why you don't park near the fire hydrant.

[@superharek]

Genuine question, why they just don't have the line go around the car, rather than through it? I didn't see any markings prohibiting parking next to the hydrant, is it illegal to park next to them, and they don't need to have any markings?

[@hazwiz7004]

@@superharek I agree, as a firefighter myself this was NOT justifiable. Yes, the car was too close to the hydrant but not blocking it. That supply line would have been easier and quicker to deploy behind and around the car. Not to mention safer as well. That supply line now has a risk of getting damaged putting the firefighters on the attack lines at risk. I have to ask is it worth trying to make a point putting your brothers at risk?

[@georgebaggitt1930]

@@hazwiz7004 You are way out of line. What planet are you from ???

[@georgebaggitt1930]

@@superharek You do NOT park anywhere near a fire hydrant anywhere in the world...got it ?

[@stbu9709]

Seemed petty to me, firefighter wasted time trying to smash the car up instead of just running the hoses! 🤷🏼

[@ERICSANFILIPPO]

DMN FUCKING CRAZY FDNY ENGINE 82 FIREHOSE THROUGH CAR WINDOW 2 HOOK UP 2 HYDRANT:

[@floater81floats37]

As a full time firefighter of 16 years im always amazed by the American tradition of doing everything but putting water on the fire😂 don't want to push that fire lol

[@virgilhilts3924]

I'm amazed by the number of phonies who claim they are experienced firefighter who turn around and prove they aren't

[@bobvidoni5898]

Depends on the jurisdiction. Many (most???) are very good, but NY and LA.... meh.

[@RoseMadrid-e5t]

🥞THE GOSPEL OF THE WORD OF ALMIGHTY GOD "the last age in which God is saving man from the imminent destruction of this old world" (Can the name Jesus--"God with us"--represent the whole disposition of God? Can it clearly describe God? God may be called by many names, but by these names, no one can fathom the fullness of God, no one can fully represent God. Man has only a limited vocabulary available to summarize all he knows about God's disposition: great, revered, mysterious, unfathomable, supreme, divine, righteous, wise, etc. There are so many words! God is so great! God is so holy! God is so lovable! One particular word or name is incapable of representing God in His entirety, so do you think His name can be made permanent? God is so great and so holy, but you won't let Him change His name in every new age? Therefore, in each age that God personally carries out His own work, He uses a name appropriate to the age to sum up the work He intends to do. This is God's use of human language to express His own disposition. There is no single name that can sum up God's disposition, and there is no single name that can describe all that God is and is. If someone asks Me. "What name do You really use? I will say to them, "God is God!" The day will come when God will no longer be called Jehovah, Jesus, or the Messiah--He will be called the Creator.) Almighty God said Can the NAME JESUS---"GOD with US"---represent the WHOLE DISPOSITION of GOD? Can it CLEARLY EXPLAIN GOD? If man SAYS that GOD can only be NAMED JESUS, and CANNOT HAVE any other NAME because GOD CANNOT CHANGE His DISPOSITION, those WORDS are indeed BLASPHEMY against GOD! Do you BELIEVE the NAME JESUS, GOD with US, can ALONE REPRESENT GOD in His WHOLENESS? GOD can be CALLED by different NAMES, but among these NAMES, NO ONE can contain the WHOLENESS of GOD, NO ONE can fully REPRESENT GOD. ☀️ And so, GOD has many NAMES, but these NAMES CANNOT COMPLETELY EXPRESS GOD'S DISPOSITION, because GOD'S DISPOSITION is VERY ABUNDANT and EXCEEDS MAN'S ABILITY to KNOW Him. There is NO WAY for MAN, using MAN'S LANGUAGE, to COMPLETELY SUMMARIZE God. 🙏 MAN has ONLY a LIMITED VOCABULARY AVAILABLE to SUMMARIZE all he KNOWS about GOD'S DISPOSITION: GREAT, REVERED, MYSTERIOUS, UNFATHOMABLE, SUPREME, HOLY, RIGHTEOUS, WISE, and so on. So MANY WORDS! 🙏💐 This limited vocabulary is incapable of describing how little man has witnessed of God's disposition. Later, many people added words that they felt could better describe the fire in their hearts: GOD is GREAT! GOD is VERY HOLY! GOD is so lovely! 🙏 At present, man's sayings like this have reached their peak, but man still lacks the ability to express himself clearly. And so, for MAN, GOD has MANY NAMES, but He does NOT have ONE NAME, and that is because His being GOD is TOO Abundant, and MAN'S LANGUAGE is too poor. ☀️ A particular word or name is incapable of representing God in His entirety, so do you think His name can be made permanent? GOD is so great and so holy, but you WON'T LET Him change His NAME EVERY NEW AGE? ☀️ Therefore, in EVERY TIME GOD PERSONALLY DOES HIS OWN WORK, He USES A NAME appropriate to the TIME to sum up the WORK HE intends to DO. He USES this particular NAME, one that HAS TEMPORARY SIGNIFICANCE, to REPRESENT His DISPOSITION at that TIME. ☀️🙏 This is GOD'S USE OF HUMAN LANGUAGE to EXPRESS HIS OWN DISPOSITION. 🙏 However, many people who have had spiritual experiences and personally seeing God still feel that this particular name is incapable of representing God in His entirety--unfortunately, it cannot be contained--so it is not that man calls God by any name, but simply calls Him "GOD." ☀️ The human heart seems to be full of love, but it also seems to be surrounded by contradictions, because man does not know how to explain God. WHAT GOD is is SO Abundant, that there is absolutely NO WAY to DESCRIBE it. There is NO single NAME that can sum up GOD'S DISPOSITION, and NO single NAME can DESCRIBE ALL that is and what GOD is. 🙏 If anyone ASKS Me. "What exactly is the name You use?" I WILL TELL them, "God is God!" 🙏 Isn't THAT the best NAME for GOD? Isn't that the BEST assimilation of GOD'S DISPOSITION? So why do you spend so much effort searching for God's name? Why would you think so intensely, without eating and sleeping, just for a name? The DAY WILL COME that GOD WILL NO LONGER BE CALLED JEHOVAH, JESUS, or the MESSIAH---He WILL ONLY BE CALLED the CREATOR. 💐🙏 At that TIME, ALL the NAMES He USED on EARTH WILL END, because His WORK on EARTH is OVER, AFTER that, He WILL HAVE NO NAMES. ☀️ When ALL THINGS are UNDER the RULE of the CREATOR, why would He NEED to have SO many appropriate but incomplete names? Are you still SEEKING GOD'S NAME today? Do you still dare to SAY GOD and just CALL JEHOVAH? Do you still dare to SAY that GOD CAN ONLY BE CALLED JESUS? Can you endure the SIN of blasphemy? You MUST KNOW that GOD in the BEGINNING has NO NAME. He only used one or two, or many names because He has a WORK to DO and He needs to RULE HUMANITY. Whatever NAME He is CALLED, is it NOT He CHOOSE FREELY? Would He NEED you---one of His creatures--to decide this? ☀️ The NAME by which GOD is CALLED conforms to WHAT MAN CAN UNDERSTAND, in MAN'S LANGUAGE, but this NAME is NOT a THING MAN CAN UNDERSTAND. ☀️ You can only say that there is a God in heaven, that He is called God, that He is God Himself with great power, who is so wise, so great, so wonderful, so mysterious, and so almighty, and then you have nothing more to say; that's all you can know. Because of this, can the mere name Jesus represent God Himself? When the LAST DAYS COME, even though GOD is still DOING His WORK, His NAME mush CHANGE, because it is a NEW AGE. 🙏 The Word, vol.1. The Manifestation and Work of God. The Vision of God's Work 3" Fulfilled of (Ezekiel 2:9-10). (Rev. 19:13). 📥Calling and leading everyone to His lowered Kingdom or Church because it is still standing on earth in the holy place in the air/ youtube "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD 💐 this is the fulfillment of what He said to Peter 2,000 years ago, recorded in (Matthew 16:18'19). This is the the only Church of each one of our spirit that we must listen to or eat and drink like how we eat, dress and sleep every day so that He can guide us and change us by rejecting the evil attached by satan so as to be perfect, having attained eternal life that will enter the coming replacement of the New Heaven and New Earth. 💌

[@CallsItLikeISeizeIts]

Watch many European vids and they will put as much water as they as soon as they can as fast as they can, as proven in Govs Island NIST tests. Reducing the thermal load works, but not in America 😂, where no water shall be put on a fire until,the last moment, ya know, cause fire hates water. Like a infantry squad who won’t fire back at the enemy.. oh wait, no they unload with everything they got immediately 🤓

[@anthonyvera8524]

​@@virgilhilts3924so whenever someone says something you don't like, you claim they're a phony?

[@TommyHasThoughts]

When did this happen?

[@user-jr1pj9lq2t]

Breaking the Honda windows was unnecessary. This guy just wanted to do it like in a movie. Stupid behavior

[@bobclavile5653]

Back in the 1970's, when I was a Firefighter. This kind of fire was called "LIGHTNING". Owners, Landlords, Family...but NEVER....Natural.....LIGHTNING. It always happens more when the ECONOMY is failing.

[@georgecoons6872]

lightning can punch a whole through througe 2 floors.

[@longshotny]

Yeah Sounds about right

[@TekPrimeMIA]

what kind of lightning bob 😄

[@Vic-d5c]

There was no reason to break the windows out of the car you had plenty of line to go around the car

[@Ifyoufeelawaysmd]

Car is illegally parked

[@MrTigurius]

Probably the best fire department in the country. God bless them all.

[@stuzworldz]

08:00 the Place is readying to Burst with a bit of AIR...stand back...like waaay back...

[@Scyths1]

The guy parking CLOSE to a fire hydrant was an idiot, but these firefighters are huge pieces of shits, deliberately smashing the car's windows just to make a point when the hose could have perfectly gone around. No wonder after the police firefighters are said to be the second bastards, you can clearly see why in this case. They ENJOYED breaking those windows, after all, it's not going to come out of their pockets even if they are found to be in the wrong, if.

[@BadMannerKorea]

A quick Google search would have told you at length as to why they do that. But instead you come from Reddit, mad about things you know nothing about nor did your basic research on.

[@ottodotbot]

It legitimately seems like smashing those windows not only took a LOT LONGER than just going over the vehicles hood, but also hindered the hose's ability to carry water in a pretty significant way. This move was not only malicious, but stupid and costly.

[@BadMannerKorea]

@@ottodotbot Are you a bot, or can't you read what I said, or Google? There’s numerous sources explaining why. Put your pitchforks down and go be mad about something else.

[@garretthaynes8814]

Found the guy that got his shit busted in. Don’t park so close to hydrants.

[@brianfarmer5976]

They weren’t putting water on the fire anyways they are all standing around letting burn

[@fredbiden868]

Wow lots of Fire but very very little water??? were the hell is the water and lines???

[@t._._._.]

Given the premise that ‘there’s no smoke without fire’, why is everyone stood around doing fuck all until the place really catches alight? This could’ve been so much less severe.

[@michaelsheffler5710]

Ok hard charger

[@Munter247]

This is one time I agree. No excuse not to operate large hand lines , multiversals while waiting for the towers to get into operation

[@RetLtFF43]

Well you could become a FDNY FF and tell them how to put out taxpayer fires with roll down gates

[@virgilhilts3924]

@@Munter247 Thanks for proving that you have no clue what you are talking about

[@lollipop84858]

I'd say they're not first due and are assigned RIT

[@kevinjones1993]

How dose the fire get away like this

[@CarlosLopez-zw9wo]

It took forever to get water on the fire 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 harder to watch a bunch of firefighter waiting orders or had no water??!?!

[@FDNYResponseVideos]

​​⁠​⁠it may be prudent to consider that the fire videos you see in any given year represent less than .1% of all fires that the FDNY responded to. The vast majority of fire incidents are extinguished quickly, without incident and with no representation on KZbin or the news. The fires that you DO see are the rare exception in which fire conditions have significantly extended throughout hard-to-reach void spaces and have subsequently severely compromised building safety. As is done at every fire, an aggressive interior attack was attempted - for more than 20 minutes in this instance - battling the flames which originated in the rear of the row of interconnected stores. Fire conditions then dictated the transition to an exterior attack. Water was applied long before the video began and to suggest that it wasn’t is blatantly false. Food for thought.

[@JohnnyT002]

At 18:29 mark Those 2 cars are illegally parked. One is partially blocking the cross walk and if it backed up it would block the hydrant. The other car is partially blocking the hydrant and got its windows knocked out for the hose to go to the fire truck. So that whole area should be marked off for NO PARKING.

[@Scoobawoo]

yeah thats something ive noticed alot in nyc. they dont have a yellow line around those areas like they do in nj where im from

[@golferpro1241]

@@Scoobawooyou ever been to the Bronx? lol lol lol

[@fhowland]

How is he blocking the hydrant?

[@mrmrso228]

@@fhowland The law in NYC is 15 feet to park from a hydrant. While the car isn't totally blocking the hydrant, that's also not 15 feet. Respect the law and your neighbors.

[@fhowland]

@@mrmrso228 My comment has nothing to do with the law, or measurements in feet. The car did not appear to be blocking the hose, and them breaking the windows did not appear to be necessary whatsoever.

[@doubleupd69]

Aaaaah memories, the 70s’, somethings never change….

[@aaronbradwell989]

I remember going to the Bronx to visit my grandma in the late 70s. I'm not exaggerating when I say it looked like the Gaza Strip. It was hell on earth.

[@doubleupd69]

@@aaronbradwell989 I was raised in Melrose and Morrisania. Loved it, lived near firehouses of E71/L55/B26 when they were on Park Avenue and E92/L44/B17 when I lived on College/167th. I remember the 3rd Avenue “EL” along that stretch where the business were loss. Sad.

[@RoseMadrid-e5t]

🥞THE GOSPEL OF THE WORD OF ALMIGHTY GOD "the last age in which God is saving man from the imminent destruction of this old world" (Can the name Jesus--"God with us"--represent the whole disposition of God? Can it clearly describe God? God may be called by many names, but by these names, no one can fathom the fullness of God, no one can fully represent God. Man has only a limited vocabulary available to summarize all he knows about God's disposition: great, revered, mysterious, unfathomable, supreme, divine, righteous, wise, etc. There are so many words! God is so great! God is so holy! God is so lovable! One particular word or name is incapable of representing God in His entirety, so do you think His name can be made permanent? God is so great and so holy, but you won't let Him change His name in every new age? Therefore, in each age that God personally carries out His own work, He uses a name appropriate to the age to sum up the work He intends to do. This is God's use of human language to express His own disposition. There is no single name that can sum up God's disposition, and there is no single name that can describe all that God is and is. If someone asks Me. "What name do You really use? I will say to them, "God is God!" The day will come when God will no longer be called Jehovah, Jesus, or the Messiah--He will be called the Creator.) Almighty God said Can the NAME JESUS---"GOD with US"---represent the WHOLE DISPOSITION of GOD? Can it CLEARLY EXPLAIN GOD? If man SAYS that GOD can only be NAMED JESUS, and CANNOT HAVE any other NAME because GOD CANNOT CHANGE His DISPOSITION, those WORDS are indeed BLASPHEMY against GOD! Do you BELIEVE the NAME JESUS, GOD with US, can ALONE REPRESENT GOD in His WHOLENESS? GOD can be CALLED by different NAMES, but among these NAMES, NO ONE can contain the WHOLENESS of GOD, NO ONE can fully REPRESENT GOD. ☀️ And so, GOD has many NAMES, but these NAMES CANNOT COMPLETELY EXPRESS GOD'S DISPOSITION, because GOD'S DISPOSITION is VERY ABUNDANT and EXCEEDS MAN'S ABILITY to KNOW Him. There is NO WAY for MAN, using MAN'S LANGUAGE, to COMPLETELY SUMMARIZE God. 🙏 MAN has ONLY a LIMITED VOCABULARY AVAILABLE to SUMMARIZE all he KNOWS about GOD'S DISPOSITION: GREAT, REVERED, MYSTERIOUS, UNFATHOMABLE, SUPREME, HOLY, RIGHTEOUS, WISE, and so on. So MANY WORDS! 🙏💐 This limited vocabulary is incapable of describing how little man has witnessed of God's disposition. Later, many people added words that they felt could better describe the fire in their hearts: GOD is GREAT! GOD is VERY HOLY! GOD is so lovely! 🙏 At present, man's sayings like this have reached their peak, but man still lacks the ability to express himself clearly. And so, for MAN, GOD has MANY NAMES, but He does NOT have ONE NAME, and that is because His being GOD is TOO Abundant, and MAN'S LANGUAGE is too poor. ☀️ A particular word or name is incapable of representing God in His entirety, so do you think His name can be made permanent? GOD is so great and so holy, but you WON'T LET Him change His NAME EVERY NEW AGE? ☀️ Therefore, in EVERY TIME GOD PERSONALLY DOES HIS OWN WORK, He USES A NAME appropriate to the TIME to sum up the WORK HE intends to DO. He USES this particular NAME, one that HAS TEMPORARY SIGNIFICANCE, to REPRESENT His DISPOSITION at that TIME. ☀️🙏 This is GOD'S USE OF HUMAN LANGUAGE to EXPRESS HIS OWN DISPOSITION. 🙏 However, many people who have had spiritual experiences and personally seeing God still feel that this particular name is incapable of representing God in His entirety--unfortunately, it cannot be contained--so it is not that man calls God by any name, but simply calls Him "GOD." ☀️ The human heart seems to be full of love, but it also seems to be surrounded by contradictions, because man does not know how to explain God. WHAT GOD is is SO Abundant, that there is absolutely NO WAY to DESCRIBE it. There is NO single NAME that can sum up GOD'S DISPOSITION, and NO single NAME can DESCRIBE ALL that is and what GOD is. 🙏 If anyone ASKS Me. "What exactly is the name You use?" I WILL TELL them, "God is God!" 🙏 Isn't THAT the best NAME for GOD? Isn't that the BEST assimilation of GOD'S DISPOSITION? So why do you spend so much effort searching for God's name? Why would you think so intensely, without eating and sleeping, just for a name? The DAY WILL COME that GOD WILL NO LONGER BE CALLED JEHOVAH, JESUS, or the MESSIAH---He WILL ONLY BE CALLED the CREATOR. 💐🙏 At that TIME, ALL the NAMES He USED on EARTH WILL END, because His WORK on EARTH is OVER, AFTER that, He WILL HAVE NO NAMES. ☀️ When ALL THINGS are UNDER the RULE of the CREATOR, why would He NEED to have SO many appropriate but incomplete names? Are you still SEEKING GOD'S NAME today? Do you still dare to SAY GOD and just CALL JEHOVAH? Do you still dare to SAY that GOD CAN ONLY BE CALLED JESUS? Can you endure the SIN of blasphemy? You MUST KNOW that GOD in the BEGINNING has NO NAME. He only used one or two, or many names because He has a WORK to DO and He needs to RULE HUMANITY. Whatever NAME He is CALLED, is it NOT He CHOOSE FREELY? Would He NEED you---one of His creatures--to decide this? ☀️ The NAME by which GOD is CALLED conforms to WHAT MAN CAN UNDERSTAND, in MAN'S LANGUAGE, but this NAME is NOT a THING MAN CAN UNDERSTAND. ☀️ You can only say that there is a God in heaven, that He is called God, that He is God Himself with great power, who is so wise, so great, so wonderful, so mysterious, and so almighty, and then you have nothing more to say; that's all you can know. Because of this, can the mere name Jesus represent God Himself? When the LAST DAYS COME, even though GOD is still DOING His WORK, His NAME mush CHANGE, because it is a NEW AGE. 🙏 The Word, vol.1. The Manifestation and Work of God. The Vision of God's Work 3" Fulfilled of (Ezekiel 2:9-10). (Rev. 19:13). 📥Calling and leading everyone to His lowered Kingdom or Church because it is still standing on earth in the holy place in the air/ youtube "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD 💐 this is the fulfillment of what He said to Peter 2,000 years ago, recorded in (Matthew 16:18'19). This is the the only Church of each one of our spirit that we must listen to or eat and drink like how we eat, dress and sleep every day so that He can guide us and change us by rejecting the evil attached by satan so as to be perfect, having attained eternal life that will enter the coming replacement of the New Heaven and New Earth. 💌

[@deitraemory55]

Where are the owners of the cars?

[@MrTimeless101]

at work, out of town, in the hospital, etc.

[@Buggylt]

Let's be honest they broke the window out of dushery. They would have gotten a better flow not putting the hose through the car.

[@malikhstory]

Are all parked cars covered by insurance?

[@kevinl4966]

Water?

[@EMJE272]

got to make it look good for the media and justify their existence

[@leeit2me]

never park/block a hydrant.. FDNY will destory your car.. LOL..

[@cchan37]

There was plenty room in front car to access fire hydrant, why smash windows?

[@leeit2me]

@@cchan37 this normal. We seen them do this many times. This is nothing new. Many people do park right next to the hydrants and usually nothing happens. You’re blocking, preventing FDNY from doing their job which is to put out fires.

[@Bradley38]

Seems like they will go out of their way to destroy it even if it negatively affects their firefighting efforts.

[@anslowp1]

@@cchan37 I thought the same, but hey, if you are illegally parked, you roll the dice!

[@xheralt]

@@anslowp1 They just wanted to smash a nice car and "punish" the presumed asshole rich owner. Well if not an asshole before, will be now! Assholery is contagious. FDNY better hope they never need the professional services of that car's owner.

[@MyReviews_karkan]

They clearly had plenty of hose to go around the car. Guess just like to be an asshole? Love the power trip? Not sure why they had to break the window and go through it, it even looks dumb AF.

[@greyman686]

Could have backed up a few feet too and had clear access to the hydrant.

[@MyReviews_karkan]

@@greyman686 yup. It was a dick move for the sake of being a dick