What happened before the Big Bang?

[@hzk1234]

"It's not a sin to not know something. It's only a sin to think you do when you clearly don't" - Dr. Don Lincoln

[@spiralsun1]

Chesky Stern it might also be a sin to say that we don’t know something when we clearly do! We do know what existed before or outside spacetime. You will see what I mean if you stop trying to make your way back to the beginning from within spacetime -when we know that the natural laws break down! Seriously that’s just being stupid. You can take yourself out of the universe one way. By finding the one solid thing that must have existed forever. Probability or probabilities. I explain the implications of this one foundation of reality in my video where I look hideous but Looks aren’t everything 😆🤷‍♀️ People are so sure that they don’t know but that’s patently ridiculous because you can take the whole universe as an experimental result in a way- and then we DO KNOW that there was the probability of the universe existing. We know that and that’s huge. Probability is prime. It exists without the universe. The implications of that are staggering. I explain in my video. Incidentally I am a scientist in the top 1% of IQ and I have thought about this one thing my whole life. I am not being contentious, flippant, or cute. I discuss these things with Nobel Prizewinners. He’s just wrong. kzbin.info/www/bejne/rXXMdoB5hbJqgaM

[@pradeljames3260]

@@BadBoiFX let her express her opinions. You don't hold her mind and her conciousness. Why don't you just respect different people's views. Don't be an asshole, we're all Humans. Everybody has the right to express themselves.

[@timeless_realm]

@@BadBoiFX and, likewise, no one asked for your comment.

[@StoryGordon]

Misconceptions aren't sins.

[@wanaraz]

@@spiralsun1 BS nonsense!

[@emeraldaisle2927]

The best science quote ever ( 02:42 ), "...That should impress the heck out of you. It still blows my mind, and it's what I do everyday...." - Dr. Don Lincoln

[@robertsikes8157]

WHAT QUOTE IS IT ? TEXT ME BACK.

[@D.NogueraMusic]

"It's better to have questions you can't answer, than having answers you can't question" Edit: Quote from Richard Feyman, according to many commenters below.

[@kleinbot]

42

[@MikeStoddart]

Science vs Religion?

[@D.NogueraMusic]

@@MikeStoddart it doesnt have to be a versus. Science, philosophy and religion can become dogmatic for the people who can't admit "I don't know."

[@lucidstate4664]

Moron!

[@Peter_Scheen]

@@D.NogueraMusic It goes even further. For many the "I do not know" is not an option. When you say to a creationist that you do not have an answer to a certain question they consider your whole argument invalid. Example, Evolution, tons of evidence but we do not know how Abiogenesis exactly works. Therefor, Evolution is rejected.

[@lubimenergetiky8131]

Finally a good science channel with 0 clickbait. Great job, please stay awesome.

[@02markcal]

I agree just pure science without the hype.

[@steveshadforth8792]

Unlike that Bint hoffennhuer

[@kilosolutions]

and it's not for the lack of opportunity. 11:10 proves me right.

[@RD-kz4wr]

Great pure science up to 1x10-43 seconds. During this point he throws out the most obvious point and provides 3 explanations even more radical. Physics 'breaking down' is not the most obvious explanation. You can't explain physics if what you use to calculate it doesn't exist yet. Einstein's theory perfectly predicts that space, time, and matter are interdependent. That's the 'physics' relationship we have. It's pretty obvious if you don't have one you don't have any. The most logical explanation is that there was nothing as we know it. No time, matter, or space. His concept of multiple universes is also most logical mathematically, but does not need to intercept with ours.

[@FurryFoxFren]

Well, it's not like they need to be misleading. They are a real science lab (I can confirm, I have family members working there) that actually works with these things.

[@videos4mydad]

My absolute favorite part of the video is the repetition of how "we dont know" and that it is far better to admit the truth than to arrogantly proclaim something without evidence. Love it! There is no shame in not knowing - that's what science is all about!

[@RME76048]

"... it is far better to admit the truth than to arrogantly proclaim something without evidence." Please tell that to Fox "News." And the President.

[@cosmodeus1720]

". . .arrogantly proclaim something without evidence." This is what annoys the hell out of me about Brian Cox and Michio Kaku.

[@dunruden9720]

@@RME76048 Quote, "I know this, and I'm a smart guy!" Sheesh!!

[@Mellownius]

Pretty cool since he’s a pretty chill dude ... don’t mind learning from him a little science if he can dig a little faith ... never know , he could learn a thing or two even though I’m pretty sure he’s much smarter than your average bear 😎

[@lrvogt1257]

CosmoDeus Are they claiming they know something they don’t know or something YOU don’t know... or are they saying things for which there is evidence and suggesting hypothesis. what have they said is certainly factual that is not?

[@benjaminrobles3825]

I love how he does this so we can learn and not the money cause he has no ads

[@z_boozebag]

same mans a hero

[@jacksonlarson6099]

I would imagine he already has a decent amount of money in the bank.

[@timguan5353]

yep I definitely appreciate that

[@pokerilaama8864]

@@jacksonlarson6099 maybe but has that ever stopped people grabbing every possible $?

[@biggstavros5876]

@Brad Watson Ha ha ha ha. I want some of those drugs you are taking.

[@JMichael2x2]

Ironically he gets my attention when he says, “there are some things we don’t know.” That’s probably the most accurate statement in his discussion!

[@slavaserbie9155]

Yes!!!!

[@jamescaban7710]

It's more like we know 1% of 100 but we say we got half of it figured out and they call that a theory and then supposedly use the scientific method... if you have 1% of knowledge in a subject no matter what you think you still don't know Jack schitt...

[@lightningbrigade4722]

Awesome comment

[@YTho-ev1ej]

@@jamescaban7710 what we know, we know, what we don't, we don't. Not really sure how you can fault him for that. He is providing the only knowledge humans have been able to obtain about our universe and its existence so far.

[@JMichael2x2]

Y. Tho - I’m not criticising him, what I said was true. I just think it’s more interesting when scientists talk about what they don’t know, since that’s when the juices of our imagination and innovation explode discovering. Also, when you understand what we don’t know, it’s pretty boring when a scientist starts telling you with great confidence what happened before the Big Bang.

[@kensanity178]

In high school, I lit up a cherry bomb and heard a big bang. Then I joined the Army, went to Vietnam, and heard a really big bang. How big you talkin?

[@spudhead169]

Don, the only complaint I have about your videos is a very serious one and it's something you should seriously consider. There's not enough of them.

[@ajcook7777]

Not trying to be rude or offend whatsoever with this comment: Alot of good knowledge and content but I have a hard time getting over all those forced hand gestures. It's quite easy to tell when someone constantly overuses them, in this case, they became very distracting when they were added in randomly and at will, they just didn't match the script...looked very unnatural...

[@TheCarpenterUnion]

@@ajcook7777 I think he oversimplifies things a bit for me.. The hand gestures are a good facet to presentation.

[@Elrog3]

I'm just glad he doesn't misrepresent science like so many other channels out there.

[@Pravinkumar-zv7ww]

Can someone give the content of this video in a short note.

[@samsum3738]

@@Pravinkumar-zv7ww yes

[@scarbo22]

So nice to hear a lecture without background music. Thank you.

[@peaceman269]

Yes I agree ditch the music - it's noise and doesn't help

[@chucktooley4553]

Same as with porn! A refreshing change, thank you Fermilab. 🖖🏼

[@keyboardevangelist]

The good news has once again come to you today. You can inherit the kingdom of God even if you are a sinner.. after all we are all sinners in God's standards of justice and holyness (he says that if a man looks at a woman with lust he has already committed adulterly with her in his heart NO MAN IS THAT PURE😅).....All you have to do is to honestly humbly pray repent turn away from sins (read the10 commandments) and trust that Jesus for his love❤❤ for you he left his throne in heaven and came to the world he was humbled humiliated betrayed beaten and killed for your sake to pay the fine of your sins and mine so that we won't spend our eternity in hell but with him in heaven...this might be the last time you read the gospel...Look around🔥🔥 be smart..the end is nigh🔥 ..He is coming back soooon not as the sacrificed lamb of God🐑..but as King of Kings🤴 the judge of the whole world..Your soul is on the line😭😭. Eternity is a long time.

[@bigjapko3139]

lecture WITH background music is a show, not lecture.

[@theoskeptomai2535]

@@keyboardevangelist1) How did you come to conclude that this god you've mentioned exists? 2) Couldn't others be as justified as you to propose a different explanation is responsible for all reality? Yes or no. 3) Will you admit there is no evidence that substantiates your conclusion? Yes it no. 4) Have you ever observed this god you've mentioned? Yes or no. 5) Will you admit that all that is known to be real can be observed? Yes or no.

[@aa-to6ws]

"But before that, the universe was way hotter" Weren't we all?

[@motog4221]

Hotter than that archer? I struggle to envisage such heat.

[@davidm5707]

@@motog4221 He means when we were younger, as well.

[@motog4221]

@@davidm5707 and I mean that archer was hawt. Kazowie!

[@Simon.the.Likeable]

May have been hotter but certainly lacking the complexity and depth which develop with curated aging.

[@roddymcape7697]

I always thought what happened before the Big Bang was Two and a Half Men, both created by the same producer....😁😁😁😁😷😷😷😷😷

[@hansruiter-jo4ke]

I have seen several of your videos and its always a joy to watch. You make the hard to understand much more understandable and even more interesting. Thanks for that.

[@Galacoo]

"i was a cute baby" nice try, we all know you were born 54

[@blackscreennoiseforrelaxat1517]

@MesohornyMeloveulongtime idk but man I can’t stop laughing

[@JamesBond-ml3zp]

@@blackscreennoiseforrelaxat1517 Boy this guy got Game!! He's probably got Tons of Women, waiting outside his Tent on the Sidewalk!!

[@jefflittle8913]

54? I am not sure I get the reference. The opposite of 45?

[@aaronbaddestqueen7713]

Lmao

[@alingkinai7520]

@Brad Watson i'd rather siddharta gautama return than jesus.

[@friedpicklezzz]

A HUGE compliment to the presenter and people involved creating this video. It’s not easy to explain difficult things in an easy way. Not only that, the tempo and depth is just right, there’s no distracting music and the length of the video is just perfect. Looking forward learning more.

[@mitchellc4]

The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.

[@Takeabowson1986]

@@mitchellc4 do you have evidence that any of this actually happened?

[@intlvoiceofreason9239]

@@mitchellc4 Yikes!!

[@lederereddy]

@Jeroen De Cloe "It's not easy to explain difficult things in an easy way." That's true when someone's just trying to explain something difficult. Like a rocket engineer trying to explain how all the many facets involved in the mechanics of a rocket work together to produce a rocket that does what it's designed to do. That would be very difficult to explain in an easy way. But Dr Logan, I think it was, he's trying to explain the impossible. There is no scientific method in his description. There's no science that could reveal anything about what happened before creation came into being. And the big bang model defies the laws of physics, logic, the scientific method and common sense. Apparently, this fantasy club actually believe they represent Christ. Far from it. Christ taught us to trust God's word. Not change it, amend it, manipulate it, to conform with the secular ideologies of big bangs, billions of years, evolution, etc. When, and for how long the creation event took is clearly written in the book of Genesis, and specifically, the King James version. What God's word teaches is clear. The only question is do you believe God's word or man's best guesses? Because this guy is not teaching science aka observed, tested, repeatable knowledge. He's choosing what seems most reasonable, and aligns best with the modern secular concessions. Literally, you have to presume the big bang happened before compiling various theories about when and how it happened, what was happening prior to it, what caused it, etc. Without your initial assumption that it happened, there is nothing to extrapolate upon. That means it's all fantasy. So, you tell me... What, exactly, have you actually learned from examining a long list of previous fantasies? And if you're a Christian, believe Christ. He created the world as is, in six days, approximately 6000 years ago. Personally, I chose to believe God's word... At least until it can be proven wrong. And His word, as always, has proven to be, by far, the most scientifically sustainable model of the universe's origin and creation. No model that begins with "billions of years ago" stands up to objective scrutiny. Just the observation of the many clues just inside this solar system defy and debunk that model... Dinosaur fossils, and fossils in general, have been proven to be but a few thousand years old, by numerous examples of the actual application of the scientific method. Evolutionists have only one good reason to deny science every time it defies evolution. They prefer to believe there is no Creator. But Christians don't have any good reason to deny both God and science. Peer pressure is not a good reason, btw. Leave God out of it and just stand by the actual unbiased, objective, tested and repeated observable facts. Bio matter has a half-life of about 520 years, tops. Period. End of discussion. Rescuing devises are not how science moves forward. The bible, ancient textual human history, archeology, fossils, and the objectivity of the scientific method, just to name a few, all favor God's word, at all times, and in all things. But Christians need to learn to trust God... At least until His word has been demonstrably proven wrong. If anyone could have done that, there would be no bible. It's loaded from top to bottom, side to side, cover to cover with specific people, places, things, times, dates, prophecies, world renowned events, and more... If it was all made up, it would be the easiest thing in the world to debunk.

[@Mozart1220]

@@mitchellc4 And yet there is no credible evidence backing that up. God is a MYTH, and the entire story of "jesus" is taken from several earlier "pagan" religions.

[@MrBrandx8106]

Lol my son asked me this question. I said "The Big Date".

[@jeremiahb3421]

Ahhh haha I saw what you did, good job there I saw what you did 😂

[@Morrodin-WH40K]

If he ever asks what will happen after you can say, most likely The Big Breakup :p

[@besto5486]

@@Morrodin-WH40K and then the great depression state

[@dylantrost4471]

@@Morrodin-WH40K what a lame joke

[@Morrodin-WH40K]

​@@dylantrost4471 The joke is less lame than your comment though, so I guess you are the whiner eh winner >.>

[@madisonnapolitano7531]

Amazing! This was such a consumable video! So reasonably timed, and well explained. Very, very fascinating!

[@ricardocastillo5485]

What happened before the big bang, the short version: "Dunno".

[@seelenwinter6662]

the only thing they know is, that they know nothing...

[@RockinLoud360]

PARTICLES! they did the smashing thing, very hot mmm spicy, then boom big expansion

[@waynebow-gu7wr]

Michio Kaku is working on a theory that our big bang was caused by another universe.??? How much more BS do they think we are going to take.

[@hunk2140]

this has been answered in 2019 paper by Neurokinetikz..I Dunno why these scientists keep persisting on WE DUNNO.. it's simple..dig in and get enlightened.. Theoretical Implications Either the universe has the properties of a hologram. Or the hologram has the properties of a universe. What is the Universe? The universe is a black hole. And every black hole is a universe. The big bang is the collapse of our black hole into a singularity, creating a universe in its interior. The universe is a black hole contained in a parent universe with the same laws of physics and other black holes. The 7th dimension of string theory is the plane of possible universes with the same laws of physics but different initial conditions.

[@OdinzEinherjar]

Thanks, just as i suspected.

[@MshadowsenseoC]

I respect the fact that you won't lie about y'all not knowing.

[@KrustyKlown]

there already are far too many people with sacred books full of lies of knowledge

[@kennethhicks2113]

Yes, something that should be taught in all disciplines starting in grade school.

[@KrustyKlown]

@Mike Doonsebury There a difference between Knowledge, Belief, Scientific Hypothesis, and a Scientific Theory. If you understood the difference, you wouldn't have posted your comment. Far too many people think a scientific hypothesis when stated, is something that scientists know to be true, or are asserting to be true. No, it's only a possibility they have reason to believe MAY be true, and do not have any verifiable evidence for it yet.

[@eatersofdead]

@@KrustyKlown What you just stated is the Definition of a Theory. This guy in this video is stating as fact. That is falsifying evidence, in the name of Consensus Science. To me looses all credibility. Even with a Dr. at the beginning of his name.

[@mattweston1212]

@@eatersofdead found someone who doesn't know the difference between theory as used colloquially and theory used in a scientific context. Shocker.

[@alencosic3765]

"I's not a sin to not know something, it's only a sin to think you do when you clearly don't." Well said Dr. Lincoln

[@mattpotter8725]

Someone tell this to Trump pleases!!!

[@daieast6305]

no such thing as a sin...science tends to learn most from its mistakes... and who the hay is doctor lincoln?

[@daieast6305]

@@mattpotter8725 that is below my pay grade

[@alencosic3765]

@@daieast6305 The word "sin" here is meant more like a "mistake", he used it just to piss on religions. You don't know who doc is, really? Google him

[@mattpotter8725]

@@daieast6305 It's below everybody's pay grade, but I still wish someone would tell him, but then he thinks he knows everything better than everybody else. Maybe only his own daughter could tell him, he seems to listen to her.

[@germanmusicjournalist4356]

@ Dr. Lincoln: At the end of the video you mentioned three models/cosmologies. The first one reminds me of the Cyclic Cosmology, the great opponent of every model and cosmology, that include a Big Bang. But you don't use the words "cycles", "oscillation" and "Big Bounce". So: ? The second one is Brane Cosmology (even, if you don't mention the strings, the branes, the bulk and so on), right? It was created with the intention to avoid the singularity of the Lambda-CDM model of the Big Bang Cosmology and to save the Big Bang. Brane Cosmology needs cartoonish inventions and makes predictions, that cannot be falsified (which downgrades a theory to a hypothesis). The third one is the Big Bang Cosmology paired with Eternal Inflation, leading to a multiverse with an infinite amount of universes (in almost all models, the amount is infinite). Each of the universes can have different physics. Each of the universes can be infinite in size (or can be finite in size). Each universe creates a baby-universe. Baby-universes also create baby-universes. Even if a spaceship would be able to LEAVE it's own universe 😂 and would be able to ENTER a different universe 😂 and would be able to reach the speed of light 😂 it would still end up in a "Nowhere", because the universes move away from each other faster than the speed of light. Of course, the only imaginable "interaction" between two universes would be a collision of both. IF our universe was involved in a collision (which take place very seldom), then gravity astronomy COULD be able in the future to detect the correct gravitational waves 😂. You mentioned the Brane Cosmology, but you didn't tell us about the Loop Quantum Cosomology with it's "spin-networks" and "space-time-atoms". Another weird attempt to get rid of the singularity! Did you not report about the LQC, because it is in even bigger trouble, than the Brane Cosmology? Some people call the LQC disproven, because in the vacuum the speed of light IS always the same. Brane Cosmology and LQC are more Hollywood, than real science. Eternal Inflation is the King of Hollywood!

[@hermeticxhaote4723]

"For all we know, there are still things we don't." There will never be a time in human history where this isn't true.

[@michealtaylor7745]

Yes we will. Tomorrow. Two mnths after your comment. We still don't know all shit.

[@srobertweiser]

What I don’t know could fill Soldier Field.

[@andrewferg8737]

But we do know that all physical states are derived from previous states. And we do know of another class of object not requiring an initial state.

[@mitchellc4]

The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.

[@Kiros37100]

@@mitchellc4 Why are you quoting entirely unrelated fiction books under a video about science?

[@Festerbestertester6]

I really appreciate that he's able to say "we don't know". It gives "us" (these geniuses) something to work on.

[@frankcabanski9409]

Him: "I don;t know. Therefore, I'm right." Nope.

[@mitchellc4]

The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.

[@shermie_65]

@@mitchellc4 nope genius, thats not it...

[@Kastor774]

Optimists: The glass is half full Pessimists: The glass is half empty Dr. Lincoln: Suppose you have a container that had both air and water

[@johnchildree782]

The glass is full half air, half water. You must count blessings you can not see.

[@goodpeopleoftheworldunite]

Yes

[@Rhovanion85]

Engineer: the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.

[@daleandrews3552]

I'm a fairly intelligent person holding bachelor degrees in biology (with a minor in chemistry), medical technology, and nursing, in that order. I'm a retired R.N. about 10 years now. In all that schooling, I thereby have an almost total science background. Out of all that science, I've only had 2 courses in physics that didn't require calculus. Those 2 courses would be Physical Chemistry, which are the booger bears of physics courses! I guess that explains why I was only able to fully comprehend his concepts. I really need to go back and watch the video again to try to comprehend those parts that went over my head! To be honest, I was humbled by this presentation. I rarely run across anything I read or see that goes completely over my head. 🤔

[@panzerblitz2140]

It goes over your head because it's complete 🐂 It's intended to be incomprehensible so you will buy into their religious dogma and they can get more funding.

[@Hajime319]

“You’re so hot even physics don’t apply to you

[@ceelo826]

Underappreciated comment right here

[@icetea52]

Damn that's smooth.

[@kallah4999]

Wow, thanks brah. I'm not gay though. Sorry, didn't mean to hurt your feelings buddy...

[@gregandcindygingerich9615]

Well, since he’s speaking of a point in TIME at 10 to the -48 seconds, in other words pretty effing early in the history of the universe, I think it could also be said, “You’re so fresh the laws of physics don’t apply to you! “ Just another scientifically observed option...

[@m.a2894]

Wait did Vsauce said that

[@badcamred8824]

Just want to say, I appreciate that there are men and women out there like Dr. Lincoln who are dedicating their lives to unraveling life's greatest mystery.

[@jonb6417]

... and wasting their time fabricating theories.

[@Ryan-eu3kp]

@@jonb6417 you are clueless

[@mitchellc4]

The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.

[@Ryan-eu3kp]

@@mitchellc4 Koo Koo!!! 🤣

[@shermie_65]

@@mitchellc4 nope, thats not it...

[@jameslai6879]

“I will never lie to you,” said on April 1st.

[@c.augustin]

Nope, was uploaded on 2020-03-31.

[@VanBurenOfficial]

@@c.augustin G O T T E M🥇💯🆒️

[@c.augustin]

@@VanBurenOfficial Ah, well, I forgot the ;-) - I was only half serious ;-)

[@williesmith9832]

Still, a great comment 😅

[@DDKKAY]

@@c.augustin but the comment is in 1st of April so the comment itself is a lie..😁😁

[@gorber1971]

I love that you use 'Centigrade'. I still do it, but then change it to 'Celsius' because I don't think anybody will know what I'm talking about nowadays.

[@colebizwell5407]

"But that would be a lie, and I'll never lie to you" *sniff* *thanks don*

[@Aurinkohirvi]

Next sentence: I think I can hear my lab calling. Yeah, do you, really?

[@texasnewt]

Scientists are always truthful, never corrupted like, say global warming or the COVID-19 scamdemic, ...

[@MC-ur6qv]

@@texasnewt Global warming is real and so is Covid.

[@another3997]

The problem is that we only have a small sample size, taken over a tiny period of time, and from one infinitesimally small spot in the universe. Our perspective is fixed, and we have to make many assumptions based only on the tiny snippets of information we can collect at that point. It's like sampling the air one inch above the ground outside your front door for a week, and then trying to describe the whole of the Earth's atmosphere in minute detail, just from those readings. Yet even with millions of weather measurements taken around the globe every day, dozens of weather satellites in orbit, and vast amounts of computing power running simulations, we still don't have the granularity to accurately predict the exact conditions at that one spot at any point in time. Now imagine this on a universal scale.

[@lloydperry9227]

And what if our assumptions are totally wrong?

[@pauljack7170]

How true ! Humans are overfilled of fake certitudes

[@TheHulabob]

James Webb surprised everyone

[@TheHulabob]

The Big bang .was different when the deep infra red james webb telescope shook up the science tists when they did not see what they thought they should see

[@TheHulabob]

Holy moly there's hundreds of comments

[@aaronseet2738]

"It's a sin to think you do when you clearly don't." I see this sin committed all around me practically everyday.

[@rhabdob3895]

Well at least it’s not adultery.

[@larswadefalk6423]

Definition of religion.

[@6862ptc]

@@larswadefalk6423 Exactly, they think they know what can't be known. Then condemn science.

[@jeromegoodwin3848]

Sin merely means "Short Comings" so everyone has Sin.

[@filiusvivam4315]

@@6862ptc that's a false. stop being a bigot.

[@stevewhitt9109]

The best part of this channel is your HONESTY! This is the very best video on this subject. I am a big believer in the colliding branes.

[@craiggrocott7559]

“I would rather have questions that can’t be answered than answers that can’t be questioned”.

[@spyeatte]

@Larry Chappell The elephant in the room is that before the big bang there was nothing (no time, no space, no mass, no energy). Genesis 1:1 - In the beginning God created... The physical laws of time and space, and the relationship of mass and energy, and all atomic values defined in the first microsecond. Since God created them he operated outside those parameters and is in no way limited by them in any way. So what was before the big bang we can never know...until we die and then it won't matter. Apparently the universe is a one-time event. It was created, will exist for a period of time (approximately 145 billion years) then the "Big Rip" will end it all with all mass reduced to sub-atomic particles and be rolled up like a scroll.

[@moderntechnology7010]

tru

[@vercingetorix3414]

@@spyeatte So Genesis is your science textbook? The flood Tower of Babel Adam and Eve Talking serpents The Nephili The children of God mating with the daughters of men etc. Are part of your science curriculum?

[@karnobot9814]

@@spyeatte here is why religion is so toxic to people. They think Pretending to know the unknown is knowing and make unsubstantiated claims is virtuous as long as its made in the name of diety and religion

[@MC-ur6qv]

@@karnobot9814 Yep. They try to explain stuff that can be explained with science, given time, with some crazy idea of an all powerful being creating everything and when they’re is a legit good point against religion they point to faith

[@Romogi]

'I will never lie to you'. Humility is a requirement for good science.

[@paulweeldreyer7457]

And desperately lacking today. Just look at how the lab leak hypothesis was treated (lied about).

[@michaelbee2165]

@@HamhocksUnlimited It's not any different from Mengele actually.

[@maryjane1085]

It's usually something that is often said by liars actually - otherwise why would they feel the need to say it - other than to reassure the gullible...

[@1970Phoenix]

@@HamhocksUnlimited I'm trying to work out if you are a troll or just uneducated (I suspect its the latter). Its perfectly reasonable and entirely honest to say there exists a consensus if indeed a consensus does exist. There are many scientific explanations for which there is indisputably a consensus. Biological evolution and the Big Bang are two such examples. It may be that you personally don't like those explanations because (perhaps) they conflict with your preferred religious narrative, but it is demonstrably true that they represent the scientific consensus on those issues.

[@cindysantillan5278]

November yeah

[@muchtentoft]

Spoiler: I don't know, you don't know, we don't know, and we'll probably never know

[@olblu8746]

Thor L we'll know when we get to heaven, Jesus will show us.

[@kinglui1257]

We’re no suppose to know we gotta enjoy what we got

[@voges1001]

Edyon hahaha

[@kinglui1257]

zesty_sauce lol you can’t do nothing your dead lmaooo

[@truepeacefromviolence9581]

@@olblu8746 death is a end to a life and nothing lies beyond that idiot

[@jackychandler8594]

13.8 Billion years. I can accept that, BUT what the hell was there BEFORE THAT? Not only that, what is Outside of the Universe? Yep. I mean, what is Outside of what we can Observe? How can there be Nothing Outside of that? Is it a cosmic wall? If so, what is beyond that ?

[@jamesdong8179]

video title: What happened before the Big Bang? me: well, obviously the Big Foreplay

[@roddymcape7697]

Two and a Half Men before and Young Sheldon later....

[@olivernald]

Our universe on my wild guess was a product of a very large black hole which reach its maximum compression of singularity causing it to explode as the big bang.

[@jamesdong8179]

@@olivernald I have a few black holes in mind. Some are a bit on the brown side though

[@jaxxonbalboa3243]

There is no before...the BB is a perpetual. This means the entire universe is constantly recycling itself...it's a process machine.

[@speedy-cc]

El basho. best comment on utube. Legend 😅🤣

[@bandotasif]

I love how Dr. Lincoln explains these things. The available information is very well presented. If he was my teacher when I was much younger I almost certainly would have gone into theoretical physics, the wonderment of science. Amazing.

[@gernothartung]

word

[@herrschmidt5477]

He never explain anything really in detail. Most of the time it's "we know this and that"

[@SEVideoQuant]

Herr Schmidt Maybe because he must summarize in 20 Minutes a 7000 pages textbook...?

[@herrschmidt5477]

@@SEVideoQuant no he must not^^

[@SEVideoQuant]

Herr Schmidt LoL

[@d4v0r_x]

ynow what they say: what happened before the bigbang, stays before the bigbang. so, its rude to ask

[@VanBurenOfficial]

Is this a haiku?

[@Arboldenrocks]

@@VanBurenOfficial no, it's a reference to Vegas. what happens inside cygnus x-1, stays inside cygnus x-1.

[@Mellownius]

You can’t get behind that event .... even under the influence of LSD or your mind altering of choice ,,, you can’t get behind that singular moment ... hint would be .... it’s not the speed of light goofy , it’s the speed of sound ..... duh .. he said ... let there be

[@Arboldenrocks]

@@Mellownius you're not as think as i drunk you are?

[@superorphangodsworshipper6577]

d4v0r_x - To ask is not rude. Not to understand and visualise things could be rude.

[@UltimaGaina]

This voice felt so familiar after listening to "The Theory of Everything" on Audible! Checking the professor's name both here and there clarified that it was not just a coincidence, but I never pictured the mustache. 😁 Great lectures!

[@ketchup5344]

"What happened before the big bang" "We dont know" thanks.

[@Music1art]

Is there any reason to know that there was a big bang?

[@ketchup5344]

@@Music1art Id rather know when the sky engineer can come round and set up my tv at the moment lol

[@WakenerOne]

Not only "We don't know," but "We probably _can't_ ever know." The Bang had already presumably happened, and expansion was already underway at the earliest point our observations can tell us anything concrete. Anything _anyone_ has to say on the actual _origin_ of the matter, energy, space, and time involved in that expansion, whether the person be of secular persuasion or theological, is a matter taken on the basis of neither empiricism nor rationalism. That leaves faith. (and before anyone claims that he uses rationalism in the video, yes, he does, but only up to the point where physics becomes meaningless. Before that, he openly admits that there is only speculation, with no actual data).

[@Music1art]

@@ketchup5344, changing the topic, why? It's about whether the big bang happened or not. If there is or not a "sky engineer" how can that prove the existence of the big bang?

[@maisiesummers42]

@@Music1art Yes. The cosmic microwave background (CMB) is direct evidence of the big bang.

[@szarvasmarha]

Q: What happened before the Big Bang? Scientist's honest answer: We just don't know.

[@cosmodeus1720]

Ah, but Q probably does know ;). kzbin.info/www/bejne/rpenoXd5qLp_pJI

[@drzilman4536]

The quantum simulation computer was switched to the on position. And before that... The quantum, quantum simulation, simulation computer was switched on. And before that, God was still asleep after a crazy party....

[@zeromph8325]

What's honesty got to do with it?

[@zeromph8325]

@@cosmodeus1720 Lol. I loved that episode when Captain Morgan brought everyone free rum.

[@maythesciencebewithyou]

Science deniers: "Got you now. I knew it, you know nothing and I've got the truth"

[@ccchhhrrriiisss100]

When I was a kid, one of my classmates used to argue that our universe (and its expansion) is simply the other side of some other parallel universe's black hole. We debated and argued over this idea throughout the fifth grade.

[@YCCCm7]

As the saying goes: "If you can't show it, you don't know it." I will admit I've had the same idea myself, and it's a fun one, but there's problems about the questions of energy quantity and why black holes don't seem to lose any coherent level of mass, although the search for Hawking radiation is still on.

[@thomasmaughan4798]

Janet Jeppsen (Mrs Isaac Asimov) wrote a novel about that very idea. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janet_Asimov "The Last Immortal" (1980) (as J. O. Jeppson)

[@shaunhumphreys6714]

that's the holographic principle, based on information thought to be imprinted on a black hole's event horizon, which was established as the solution to the information paradox by stephen hawking i think. Then speculation arose that the same thing could apply to our whole universe, all the universe as information imprinted on a two dimensional hologram, either encircling our universe or imprinted on a black hole's event horizon. This encouraged further speculation taking the idea to its most extreme conclusion-the simulation hypothesis. Holographic principle though merely speculative is way more sensible than the latter. But that's only relatively speaking. They are both fringe ideas. Indeed two experiments have been done to test for the holographic principle, one was to test for the equivalent of pixels in the structure of space-time. If this is holographic, then space will be pixelated. However so far no pixelation has been found. Another experiment, this one non lab based, used telescopes to measure the journey of different types of electromagnetic waves, specifically if space-time is not a smooth membrane like medium, then Fermi's LAT would have detected a significant time lag between the arrival of the lowest-energy and highest-energy gamma rays. In fact, to within one part in 100 million billion, the two photons traveled at the same speed. Many approaches to new theories of gravity picture space-time as having a shifting, frothy structure at physical scales trillions of times smaller than an electron. Some models predict that the foamy aspect of space-time will cause higher-energy gamma rays to move slightly more slowly than photons at lower energy. Such a model would violate Einstein's edict that all electromagnetic radiation -- radio waves, infrared, visible light, X-rays and gamma rays -- travels through a vacuum at the same speed. Fermi showed that pixelation or rough 'texture' in space-time may not exist at all. So far the smoothness of the space-time continuum has been confirmed. So that's NO to the holographic principle or simulation hypothesis. It confirms the aether/vacuum conventional idea, supported by Einstein and his predecessors which describes spacetime as euclidean. However all this fringe speculation, especially occupying populist 'science' circles, started with the information paradox black hole problem, which I'm not satisfied is solved, and I don't even think it's that great a problem-energy can't be created or destroyed, information can't be lost. These rules may not apply in extreme situations e.g. at the high energy and temperatures just after time equals zero st the big bang our laws of physics did not apply. And similarly things break down in black holes-which are the most extreme predictions derived from General relativity's mathematics-all the tensor and vector calculus. the schwarzschild metric and the kerr metric describes the physics of black holes, and it's pretty crazy,the maths says in a kerr black hole you can visit your own past. Black holes spin space and time. All real black holes are spinning black holes. The angular momentum of the star thay collapsed, plus the material the black hole devows, even at a quantum level, the angular momentum of every fermion and boson means black holes always rotate. A paper in the astrophysical journal detailed how gamma ray bursts seem to produce superluminal motion, with superluminal gamma waves being time reversed.. gamma ray burst only happen in very extreme cosmological events and therefore are another example of where our laws of physics may break down to produce faster than light travel through space under that unique condition. iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ab3bdf

[@TotalGAMIX]

It doesn't make sense cause what would've caused that universe. And then that universe and then that and then that and then that universe. There must be a beginning

[@briandolan2224]

Pretty cool dialog for 5th graders! In 5th grade I spent most of my time avoiding cooties and trying to figure out why those creatures called girls were starting to be interesting!

[@BrianAdams-dt1ks]

What happened at t=0 and "before" is unknowable and will never be known. End of story.

[@Manguadesignz]

Subbed simply because i genuinely learned with no ads

[@JamesPattersonamg]

Me 2

[@MnM008]

When will it get dubbed?

[@wadesmith3092]

His most astute statement is "let's talk about the things we do know". His next word following that is "assuming".

[@athasmak1161]

But if we do know, then we do know while he is assuming.

[@meesalikeu]

when u assume u make an ass of u & me.

[@daieast6305]

@@athasmak1161 : one thing i do know is that 'we' is way overused!

[@daieast6305]

@wade smith : yup, another scientist talkin out his assuming

[@rancidpitts8243]

Things we do know. Assuming. Well, at one time people KNEW if you traveled to far you could fall off the edge of the earth, assuming the world was flat. Also the earth was the center of all there was. What is truth today can be rubbish tomorrow with new discoveries. The best we can do is Assume we are correct.

[@astrodude7306]

I teach astronomy and this still blows my mind

[@kylie_joe]

Thank you for a straightforward video about this subject!

[@meranism673]

For me this is the best channel on KZbin to learn things about physics. Thanks for these valuable contents !

[@demonshaz]

"What happened before the big bang?" Easy answer. "We dont know"!!

[@ToniLixSim]

hahahahhaha ye this is real answer :D

[@ynntari2775]

the small bang

[@blackholeentry3489]

Well, actually it can ALL be traced back to the rather short coitus!

[@spiralsun1]

I will never agree to that. We do. It’s obvious. Like knowing how the Grand Canyon formed. We KNOW. but we can never actually see it.

[@spiralsun1]

@@johnstumpf8401 closest answer I have seen. Excellent. ❤️

[@arthurhunt642]

This is absolutely the most interesting video I think I've seen on this subject. This is dealing with our universe. Heavy on the word "our".

[@-f8884]

You mean MY Universe. You exist in my Universe pal. You should be so lucky.

[@Paul-hl8yg]

We ARE Universe!! 🇬🇧

[@mrhassell]

How many containers, could the containers contain, when the containers contents counted air?

[@marqgoldberg7454]

I may have to listen to this video 100 before I absorb all of its content. He communicates EXTREMEMY well; but single sentences often contain 3 or more complex ideas that have to be understood individually before connecting them together so as to grasp the meaning of the entire sentence. Each successive sentence then builds upon what preceded it. It's a struggle for me but an immensely rewarding one.

[@johnjepsen4243]

It's science fiction. Bull feces.

[@marqgoldberg7454]

@@johnjepsen4243 do you believe Jesus magiced it up? I guess that's easier. But you never get to learn anything worthwhile.

[@schechter01]

"extrememy"?

[@daleandrews3552]

Read my post above, Marq!

[@charlesx593]

@@Dawn-Songs Genesis tells us what happened science is trying to discover how it happened.

[@henrikpersson1962]

I think all of this is confusing to me, still I'm watching it.

[@pokerilaama8864]

Me too.

[@ozzyzee1770]

What a pleasant, likeable chap. Very well explained

[@salvor1]

This is the first I have heard of close to a long standing belief I have had, the lava lamp hypothesis. In this infinite space, there are an infinite number of black holes, some of which eventually migrate together and eat everything in their localized area, eventually reaching a critical point, at which time, they expand. The most recent event in our known universe, we call the big bang. There are an unlimited number of these events happening concurrently. The regions expand until the matter is recalled with gravity to start the process over again. Some material may escape to join an adjacent recall. Some of the material from adjacent cycles may soon be part of the next local recall. This has gone on with no beginning, and will continue with no end. What I'm trying to say here is that if you got the wrong color paint for your kitchen, it really doesn't matter.

[@SStupendous]

Universe will come to end end eventually, whether something we don't know yet, heat death, whatever it is it will end sometime.

[@BavonWW]

As I suspected just more endless waiting for the answer; although it will involve a piece of our space garbage. Just joking; I ponder the question at least once a day.

[@anderd333]

"This has gone on with no beginning, and will continue with no end. " So, everything came from nothing, and everything has no cause?

[@SStupendous]

@@anderd333 -And no end apparently

[@salvor1]

@@anderd333 no, everything came from what existed already. Who says it needs a cause? Looking at how insignificant we are, there is no who.

[@MillerFourFingers]

When a scientist says "We don't know" respect goes up.

[@davidwayne8336]

And when religious-ists claim they know something, the opposite happens.

[@alexamaya3208]

@@davidwayne8336 Claiming to know the answer to something isn’t disreputable in and of itself. It’s the answer you seem to have a bias against, and therefore a hostility that lowers your respect for any theist. But there are perfectly reasonable reasons why we believe God caused the Big Bang, such as the first mover argument. Or the uncaused cause

[@MC-ur6qv]

@@alexamaya3208 Don’t take that guy as an example for all thiests. Believe it or not some of us think they’re may be something after death, we just don’t believe in a particular god.

[@michaelbee2165]

@@davidwayne8336 But only from unbelievers. We can share the Gospel but only a fool says there is no God. That is from Psalms. And if we share, that person's salvation is not our responsibility. It is between that person and God, not between me and the unbeliever. So you see, I am commanded to share the gospel but not responsible. You are neither, but insist on demanding believers betray Jesus Christ. I pray you come to recognize His call.

[@michaelbee2165]

@@alexamaya3208 Very well stated. Factual and reasonable.

[@Yashiro-nene_dies]

Sometimes I think we're inside of a black hole giving ua the illusion that space is expanding but actually shrinking from the forces of the black hole...shit this weed is good.

[@bluesewage980]

something my older brother said once was " the universe is microscopic and we live at the singularity of an infinitely collapsing black hole." probably not true, but i the sentiment.

[@teachoc9482]

If we just gave Fermilab a bunch of "brownies", we'd get so many great physics advancements. HA!

[@Andrew-zq3ip]

You might be on to something. Matter contracting, and the heavy bits dragging it's satellites with it, would look identical to space expanding.

[@angrymokyuu1951]

The trouble with us shrinking is that EM radiation wouldn't be affected - meaning we'd start going blind as the sun puts out the same frequencies while our eyes shrink too small to see them.

[@mahroofnoormohamed9834]

I'm an accountant, I thought until now finance ruled the world but I have now seen the light, yes I now agree PHYSICS is everything

[@anathardayaldar]

7:40 "It's only a sin to think you know something when you clearly don't." Religions have entered the chat. Experts on the Internet: Hold my dunning-kruger effect.

[@Alexagrigorieff]

The story so far: In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.

[@silknfeathers]

@Andy Solomons Well, it's certainly simple for you...

[@claytonrealist8868]

In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth. Science will hopefully understand that they can't figure some things out because it is beyond human comprehension.

[@panc8ke324]

Sounds like Hitchhikers Guide to me....

[@silknfeathers]

@@claytonrealist8868 So why do you think you can place a god in there, if it is "beyond human comprehension"?

[@Gruuvin1]

@@silknfeathers your problem might be a problem of semantics. The word 'God' might be used with the most varied of meanings of all words. Think about what this video attempts to contemplate: what is before the beginning of the universe, and even is the cause of the universe? Do we yet have a word for it? Start with a brand new word; and give it an initial meaning, such as: that which exists independently from and causes our known universe of space, time, matter, and energy. Then, by way of logic and reason, describe the attributes which are necessary for such a 'thing' to be accurately defined as such. If it exists independently of time, then it is timeless. If it exists independently of space, then it is omnipresent. If it exists while there is no matter, then it is immaterial. If it causes the beginning of all known energy and matter, then it is omnipotent. If it exists timelessly yet causes at a time, it might be considered agency. If it causes all that is known it is omniscient. Keep going. One can come up with a few more logically necessary attributes. Then you can call it what you want. You can even recognize that some people are already using a word for this. Maybe they are importing more meaning ascribed to that word than some people find comfortable. It's semantics, at that point. Or you can take the view that you don't like any of the logical conclusions about the necessary attributes, and choose instead to believe that 'nothing' could precede (or co-exist with) the moment of creation, but that is logically absurd.

[@therearenoshortcuts9868]

"what happened before the Big BANG" .... the Big Seduction?......

[@summersky77]

The Big Blow, usually comes before the big bang. Seduction starts well before that.

[@___..Blade..___]

Underrated

[@nebwachamp]

The Big Cosby

[@summersky77]

@@nebwachamp You win. Best reply yet!

[@RonaldModesitt]

Thank you for another great physics video! During most of your videos you are standing in front of a black board with all kinds of calculations, that really intrigue me. I know the black board is primarily for show. But, I wonder if you would consider discussing the black board and some of the equations that are pertinent?

[@RonaldModesitt]

@Slippery Storm Funny, Don doesn't look like one of those kind of guys!

[@RonaldModesitt]

@Slippery Storm Careful Slippery, you're gonna get us in trouble!

[@TheFlyingBrain.]

That would require imagining that the viewer is capable of thinking beyond the surface of things, and that is just something that isn't done in the case of videos like these. It's much easier to provide the appearance of teaching, than it is to actually TEACH.

[@4apca]

Thank you Dr Lincoln for another exceptional piece.

[@Tall-Cool-Drink]

"Everything after 10^-13 second is solidly known..." That's a bold statement.......

[@ustadmiqbal7772]

Only on macroscopic scales.

[@jonb6417]

And it's also utter bollox!

[@mitchellc4]

The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.

[@mysynthsandstuff6519]

Mitchell C if Jesus did did exist (I’m not saying he did or doesn’t) I’m fairly sure he wouldn’t encourage you spamming people while they here listening and learning.

[@martinc.720]

@@mitchellc4 He won’t return for as long as you keep spamming

[@tenormdness]

For 14 minutes and 34 seconds, there was no Covid19. Thank you, sir!

[@zradek]

And, there it is again. "thank you", sir

[@ajcook7777]

Well looks like you just ruined that 🤦🤦🤦

[@superorphangodsworshipper6577]

Average Joe - Be ALERT. Be safe (even if others don't permit). Because there is no second chance for being born again.

[@superorphangodsworshipper6577]

@@ajcook7777 - Biological weapons could be sure. It is a way of extinction of part or full human race, INSTEAD of saving human race. Death is the surest. But dying earlier by Corona virus is a swift and pathetic way to die due to human foolishness. ---

[@timwhite5562]

I don't know why I watch these videos that talk about this specific "what came before" subject expecting an answer. Regardless of how interesting and how well they answer this question, the answer is inevitably going to be the same: we just don't know. It is amazing that they know as much as they do.

[@WayneLynch69]

Actually there's a very great deal we do know, and it's not flattering. Einstein said: "thermodynamics is the one theory of universal content which will never be overthrown". Arthur Eddington made Einstein Einstein. He said: "if your theory challenges thermodynamics there is no hope for you other than total humiliation". These theorists, well-intentioned or other(Brian Greene), put bread on their table with their theories. NO ONE grants $$$ to respond to, "we don't know and there's every reason to think we never will". So reasonably they HAVE to propose hypotheses. But NOTHING is suggested that doesn't conflict prima facie with thermodynamics. 1st Law disallows heat from cold: this universe of heat from "nothing"(cold). 2nd Law demands that heat goes only to cold: this universe of heat would have distributed to cold if eternal....it has not so it's not eternal. NOTICE NONE of them EVER refer to a reconciliation with thermodynamics. NOT because they don't have it...OF COURSE THEY DON'T. But because NO ONE EVER voices the words; "thermodynamics is wrong". It's the clergy saying "there's no God"; THEIR JOB IS OVER!! (some clown will suggest quantum physics; QM can NEVER conflict with "conservation laws".)

[@danieljones9245]

Don Lincoln here did not properly explain what actually occurred before existence expanded out of the singularity. The singularity is where/when all this existence was merged into, you got it, a "singularity". What is this singularity? This is energy at its maximum level of intensity, an infinite level of intensity. It is not possible to go beyond an infinite/maximum level of energy which is why we can logically conclude the singularity does not have a beginning. As existence expands, the level of energy decreases, and will continue decreasing until its minimum level of intensity, even if it takes an eternity to get there.

[@valinorean4816]

@@WayneLynch69 learn inflation and Vilenkin's tunneling

[@kippertrace5808]

@@WayneLynch69 but, how do you really know? You put your trust in what you read. How do you really know that's what Einstein actually said? He may be fiction. I know it seems to all make sense but, how can we really know.?

[@normtheteacher5485]

Matter can't be created from nothing but at one time it was. Our brains are not equipped to deal with this type of problem. There is something out there that we are completly blind to. We need more than the 5 senses that we have.

[@mehbleh5835]

What I don't understand about this video --well, I don't understand all of it but what bugs me the most-- is the visible universe parts, specially around minute 07:50. "Certainly all of the visible universe was much smaller than it is now". I don't get that. Much smaller before the big bang? After the big bang up until now? I wasn't sure what that meant and then that image and later the chart show up about the distant universe and the pieces to the puzzle scattered. Was there a distant universe before the big bang? And what exactly is the visible universe? Also, apparently there is another thing called the observable universe and it is not the same thing as the visible universe. Can someone help me out cause Google and Wikipedia are too stupid (it pops up showy articles about the big bang that offer way less information than channels like these for the sake of ad revenue) or too smart (Wikipedia is not a place known to dumb-down their science terminology) to be of any help.

[@jimjohnson682]

There are a few basic questions about the source of the universe, for example, A. Is the concept of abstract reality rational? B. Could there be different universal rules or laws of physics, many universes (multiverse)? C. Is spacetime finite or infinite? D. Is the source of energy from a quantum field or a cyclic universe? E. And did something “just exist” or was it created? This video, kzbin.info/www/bejne/e57JZ5tugNx0mq8, provides a framework for a logical discussion of these “philosophical” issues. It defines what precedes the big bang in terms of nothing plus four somethings (universal rules, laws of physics, spacetime, and energy). This description provides a reference point for philosophical questions related to the four somethings (8 minute video).

[@johnhough7738]

To answer 'C' ... it has to be infinite! Both ways. And now some genius will mutter darkly to the effect "...it's circular, you unthinking oaf!" (Phew, than heavens-no beginning, no end.) (I might live with that, if I had faith in such genius.) But to my limited imagination every circle is simply lots of little bits until finally joined. (See where we could be going with this?) The end and beginnings of time can be answered by the same religiosi who tell us blandly that everything qua Everything is of God ... and then when you ask where did ol' God come from, who created God? You promptly get the glib "Oh no! He was/is/ever shall/will be eternal!" (At primary school in New Zealand I just about blew a fuse trying to imagine that; and once got the strap for impudence when my questions drove the teacher out of her depth.)

[@allaction7816]

@@johnhough7738 If that's the case and U don't understand then simply ask your own self a question "Did ALL of this happened 'automatically' OR Was it 'created?', find an answer to that question and U'll know your own one"

[@johnhough7738]

@@allaction7816 Created of course, just as every (R) every thing was/should be. No? Now that I've bitten the bait, let me ask in return: Who then, created That First Creator?

[@allaction7816]

@@johnhough7738 U already have an answer No One since he's already there What else were U expecting. Tell me something, can a computer made by us know everything about us, comprehend us without us ever telling it anything about us The answer is no, it cant. Yes Humans are special and not like machines. We have imaginations, conciousness, creativity, intelligence and many others BUT we're not perfect. Scintist would say, I cant comprehend the concept of god and that's the greatest joke in the world. We can't even comprehend his creations and yet we're trying to comprehend him? It's like beginning point is zero but we directly jump to million, asking whats there. How would we know whats there without first knowing everything below that point Anyway, tell me one fact which contradicts the existance of a higher power. The evolution theory? That stuff contradicts itself and is faar from complete. Again tell me, can it explain of how if every living organism evolved from a preexisting one then how is it that only humans have all those gifts while others don't Anyway tell me one fact

[@thatdude2369]

@@allaction7816 "The evolution theory? That stuff contradicts itself and is faar from complete. Again tell me, can it explain of how if every living organism evolved from a preexisting one then how is it that only humans have all those gifts while others don't" That's not the problem of evolutionthat'ss your lack of understanding. How is it that only humans have all those gifts while others don't" Every animal has a "gift" If that is what you want to call it. They simply evolved differently based on the environment they are in, and what gifts do humans have that animals do not? As someone who studies animals I can tell you we have a lot more in common with animals than the average ignorant person knows.

[@raymcconnell1075]

Thank you Dr. Lincoln. You are one of the best science communicators of our age. Keep the videos coming!

[@jessegonzalez7454]

Horse manewer

[@abrahammulder]

Yes, he changed the universe and the world 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@tedskins]

These are the kind of videos you watch at 3 AM

[@raditzsuper9782]

lol 😂

[@absolutelynothing3621]

I am watching at 730 am

[@whambamcantacam1042]

1 am here

[@mitchellc4]

The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.

[@absolutelynothing3621]

@@mitchellc4 what relevance does that have with what we were saying?

[@Manc-fh5we]

Time is infinite. Just like a circle. There was no start and will be no end. The “Big Bang” was the result of a collision between two or more universes. I spoke to the angels and they told me.

[@logicalatheist1065]

You mean the universe creating flying green pixies

[@ASLUHLUHC3]

The Big Bang is so misunderstood. People think it's about what happened from time t=0, and that it asserts the creation of matter & time from nothing at that 'singularity'.

[@Garyskinner2422]

Explain it to me pls

[@sinenomine334]

@Gary Skinner Imagine you were created immediately after reading this and your memories were created with you. What was there before the big bang is what was there before you were hypothetically created.

[@Garyskinner2422]

@Eastern fence Lizard Yes it definitely didn't come from nothing where this singularity arose and how is the question, quantum physics postulates that matter can pop into existence with its anti matter and dissappear so yep we just don't actually know as of yet, just wanted to hear what other people think and I feel the same

[@Garyskinner2422]

@Eastern fence Lizard Ty and how did you come to choose Eastern fence lizard lol

[@Garyskinner2422]

@Eastern fence Lizard Haha

[@prashantmishra1994]

Hi Don! It was informative video for everyone.That's because,you explained to us in a clear and concise way. Thanks & regards.

[@gtechnosinc2518]

yes, can you get something from nothing?try it, do your experiment idiot.

[@pguti778]

7:44 the best 10 seconds of a KZbin ever !!!!

[@ronenshtein7083]

Yessss!

[@arzentvm]

is xfce still being develop?

[@pguti778]

@@arzentvm unfortunately, not as often as I'd like. :(

[@SilenceStabber]

Lol religions, God, Hell, other bullshit

[@AussieInDistortedworld]

@@SilenceStabber it's not bullshit

[@anthonyat2401]

Another excellent presentation by Dr Don.

[@Iceman-xx1kh]

Let's hope the James Webb can get safely up and bring sooo much more.

[@mlmimichaellucasmontereyin6765]

Yes!!! Now. I give 10:1 odds that the view is at least 10x "bigger" than before. Zo send me your bet & I will start an escrow account to cover it. O...BTW, there R so many shibboleths in this BS video that I will refuse to accept wagers from those of you who believe any of the absurdities claimed about all that BS about what exists beyond what real science can study (etc.).

[@devastatn]

I just can't get past how the universe went from something the size of a pinhead to enough volume to make up all the matter we no of and all the rest we haven't seen yet. Great video btw.

[@allhopeabandon7831]

...and they say that WE believe in Faerie Tales...

[@radrook7584]

But you can get past how DNA supposedly programed itself?

[@suserman7775]

@@radrook7584 Oh wow I guess that definitely means a man walked on water 2000 years ago. Lol. Get real bro.

[@phild249]

@@suserman7775 There's no connection.

[@WorksopGimp]

Because it didn't this is science fiction

[@prabhatb]

Follow-up questions to consider - If the static model of universe at t=0 to consider, then what triggered the explosion? At t=0 what force could have kept the universe infinite small. And if all of space and matter was in compressed form at t=0, then what was like existence of something (space and matter) without space?

[@followme8238]

Oh that’s and easy one: the Lord snapped his fingers like Thanos and pop! everything started

[@belladonnahigh9206]

@@followme8238 yeah, but I wonder, what was beyond that infinitely small point that caused the big bang? Did it destroy, as it was expanding, something else that already existed? Or there was truly nothing beyond that point, like nothing of all nothingness, that it couldn't be even called something? Cause today science says even nothing is something, can there be a true nothing that isn't something? And how it would look like (nothing meaning not even the color black representing darkness and nothingness)?

[@followme8238]

@@belladonnahigh9206 all good questions which God may answer after our resurrection. We won’t know if our minds will be able to understand it all then - but we shouldn’t be surprised if we don’t understand it now. In Isaiah in the Bible God says ‘my ways are not your ways, my thoughts are not your thoughts’ after describing how He is the creator of all. Sure, it’s good for scientist to push and expand the boundaries of knowledge, but it’s not good/scientific to eliminate an alternative, like God, out of hand.

[@belladonnahigh9206]

@@followme8238 I believe more in reincarnation if anything else. There may be a God, but there may be none. Those who say they found the proof for existence/nonexistence of God are both ignorant or it's wishful thinking, because a true God could exist and he can either show he exists or never do so, because he's almighty and can do anything. Unfortunately I would rather call him our Creator, as he could create us, but heaven is a myth, and he could be long gone or still be with us, depending on how time flows for him in correlation to us, or he's immortal and time doesn't matter to him. But if he's immortal, why did he create such a fragile creation such as this universe, where everything decays and dies? That would be rather a proof he's also just a mortal that created us. For all we know, we could be some alien's science class project. Afterlife is the biggest problem. He could have created us and either he doesn't care anymore and there is no heaven, or he didn't create us in mind of us going somewhere after death. But in science there is this theory that what can happen will happen, eventually, no matter how much time it takes. So I believe in reincarnation - we are a form of energy. After our death that energy transfers into something else, so maybe we will be reborn. Or the atoms that once formed us will come together again to form us again - it can happen after a very long time, Googol Plex (that number cannot be written on all the computers nor our entire planet - rather the zeroes would go from here to the visible universe and back with room to spare - that's how large this number is - it would require a computer the size of our Solar System to write it down digitally) - for us dead people time does not exist, so Googol Plex of years would pass by in a second and bam - we are alive again. We know about our universe less than 0% (I know that's impossible, but I wanted to make a point) yet we know more about it than our oceans - let that sink in. We are still relatively a very primitive civilization. What are atom bombs compared to nature's super volcanos or a damn 100 meter rock from outer space travelling 25 Km/s? Anything happens to the planet and we're history. I guess what I'm trying to say here is we, with all our smartphones really know nothing except for some basic stuff about ourselves and the universe, and the more we know the less we know. One answer creates a thousand more questions. For all we know we live in a simulation. stored on a 2d plain disc. Everything can happen. Maybe we already colonized the whole galaxy, bc we sent our seeds so to speak everywhere to start from the beginning and our forefathers did in order to save humanity, as their Sun was going hypernova. Maybe we don't resemble them 100% but we were created in their image. And thus maybe reincarnation exists. Or maybe heaven. Who knows. Or maybe nothing, which is still something according to science. It's all just speculation and wishful thinking on my part, but hey, a man can dream of a better life after this one when it sucks. Those at the beginning of their lives with great lives don't bother and even are sworn atheists. Come death time and many people turn to God, how "funny", is it not? I'm 34 and already hope there's afterlife, because my life is ridden with severe depression. Ok, I will stop now, because I'm feeling sad.

[@ernestolula3280]

Stop all this bla-bla ! Learn, and leave the time guide the humanity to more nowledge. Infinit small is not a concept. T=0 is a fake, when at that times, it is not clear that time is at all a quantitative variable. There are a lot of thing that exists without needing any space. Their existence can be prooved today, and yaeh, we have the space to do it.

[@LooxJJ]

This man is the first honest scientist on this subject. We don’t know… and we may never know the nature of the universe

[@mpersand]

Bro, were you really listening to him? "Everything after 10 to the minus 13 seconds is solidly known.". This man believes that he knows solidly how the universe was created back to the very first second. He's so narcissistic, that he says they don't exactly know what happened from time 0 to 10^-13 seconds, but what they think is sensible speculation. After 10^13 seconds? Oh no, that's not speculation. He just knows. I have no problem with the theory. It may be true. It may not be. Personally, I think the odds of them actually being correct are astronomical (no pun intended). My problem is the insane amount of arrogance to basically just take this theory as complete fact. Actually, I don't think he "basically" takes it as fact. I'm pretty sure he completely takes this as fact, and a done deal. Which again, I have no problem with him believing that either. I wished he would just acknowledge it as a belief. A very strong belief.

[@timesquare5473]

@@mpersand If you listen near the end he states that what we presently know might not be correct at all so that negates your "narcissistic" comment, but then again it takes one to know one 🤪

[@johnslugger]

Why does science think we are the ONLY "BIG BANG" out their in infinite space? Travel fast enough and far enough and you will run into other big bang zones forever and ever.

[@LooxJJ]

@@johnslugger and how do you substantiate your claim?

[@LooxJJ]

@@mpersand Unless you know more than anyone else on this subject matter, of few "evidences" that we currently have of Big Bang theory, a couple of them are CBR and red shifts - which raises more question of validity of the claim than actually being evidences. What we can all agree is that - there are so many things we do not know - and perhaps will never know, about the universe.

[@bjknuckles7873]

dr. lincolns humble and honest demeanor is so refreshing in comparison with the dogmatic arrogance so prevalent in the scientific community.

[@j.wick6666]

You mean religion

[@bjknuckles7873]

@@j.wick6666 no denying there are religious dogmatists. dr. lincoln represents the scientific community though.

[@j.wick6666]

@@bjknuckles7873 so he's talking like any other scientists who talks about the subject, you're just push a bs view you have of other scientists you don't agree with that tend to be atheistic

[@bjknuckles7873]

@@j.wick6666 no just the ones that are arrogantly dogmatic. you do realize not all scientists agree about everything. and there are some who are overly high on their opinion, which is often a scientistic opinion and not a scientific one.

[@j.wick6666]

@@bjknuckles7873 name one universally known scientists that does this

[@mariaazevedo3417]

I love to watch scientists explain things about the universe that can't be proven in our life time. Maybe in a few generations we'll probably be able to if the human race will still be around that is.

[@routmaster38]

No one can explain where the original energy that caused the big bang came from.I think it always existed because there is no begining only cycles of birth and death of everything including our planet,sun,etc.

[@stevelozevski8151]

@@routmaster38 it may not have been a big bang

[@ArtyFactual_Intelligence]

@@stevelozevski8151 Couldn't have been. No-one had ears.

[@stevelozevski8151]

@@ArtyFactual_Intelligence 🤣🤣🤣

[@bigmac8574]

The way he says “much, much before that time!” Makes you understand a bit more how old time is.

[@1st_ProCactus]

Yeah and it could be a spring chicken at the same time

[@DanRagoo]

He was actually there and has the ticket to prove it

[@herrschmidt5477]

@RDE Lutherie mhm that' why whe don't even know shit about stuff like dark matter and energy and we basically find every several days stuff or bodies in the universe that shouldn't exist the way they do regarding our theories. Not saying it's all crap but oh boy we are so far away from knowing anything.

[@Religion-Is-Fiction]

@@herrschmidt5477 Scientists know a lot, but the human race is very young. There's stuff we don't even know to question yet, let alone have any answers to. If there is any such thing, we'd have to become gods ourselves to know everything, and we probably still wouldn't.

[@patkovskyi]

If time is relative to the observer/frame of reference, how can we talk about "seconds" after Big Bang? What reference frame is this?

[@BrokenSymetry]

''It's not a sin to admit you don't know, it's a sin to claim you know when you've no idea''

[@m.dwaynesteckley4832]

Yeah, that caught my attention too. Very passive-aggressive insult to our theist pals. On that note, I came upon this video as a recommendation while browsing atheist vs theist discussions. It may be an inadvertent means to point out one of theists primary arguments about creation. In that they seem to imply that only an omnipotent entity(?) could create from nothing. As the video points out there never was a nothing but there was a singularity which is a thing. Given we know so little about the singularity, It is easy to present the idea that it can't exist. It reminds me of a boss I had once whose philosophy was that if he couldn't understand something within the first 5 seconds it did not and could not make any sense and can thus be disregarded. How he got to be my boss is also something incomprehensible: hm, maybe he didn't really exist.

[@ahmednseka970]

Technically your saying it's a sin to lie ok

[@mitchellc4]

The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.

[@voodoonights1671]

Love these. Even the bits that hurt my brain!

[@bareknuckles2u]

Just listened to "Some Enchanted Evening" for the first time last night. No B.S.! I was floored by ETI.

[@frequencymanipulator]

A most splendid offering. The science explained in a calm and pragmatic manner. Thanks so much.

[@michaelpalmer7954]

"Thus saith God the LORD, he that created the heavens, and stretched them out; he that spread forth the earth, and that which cometh out of it; he that giveth breath unto the people upon it, and spirit to them that walk therein:" Isaiah 42:5 "Which commandeth the sun, and it riseth not; and sealeth up the stars. 8 Which alone spreadeth out the heavens, and treadeth upon the waves of the sea. 9 Which maketh Arcturus, Orion, and Pleiades, and the chambers of the south. 10 Which doeth great things past finding out; yea, and wonders without number." Job 9:7-10 Also search; Isaiah 45:12: Isaiah 40:22: And John 1:1-5 "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. 4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men. 5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not." Also John 3:16-18

[@jeanmanson444]

….was without form, and void: and darkness was upon the face of the deep.” “That” is what was before the “BIG BANG:” GENESIS, CHAPTER 1, VERSE 2.

[@ovidiucostici1315]

Fantastic. Helps a layman like me actually understanding some of the great questions of physics.

[@jasonmorgan661]

Big Bang theory is Bullshit. No one was there!!!!!! Or were " they" ? 🧐

[@mikebrunet54]

God explains how he made all things . Test His Word and see whether it aligns with what is true or not. The Big Bang is not how all life began . Entropy disproves the hypothesis.

[@mikebrunet54]

Any layman can know what Gods teaches.

[@ovidiucostici1315]

@@mikebrunet54 Yea, why should we listen to modern science when we have a 2000 years old book with fairy tales to learn from.

[@blulagoon21]

No one has ever answered the questions "What triggered the big bang" and, "If time did not exist before the big bang, how could there be a "Time" for it to happen".

[@blackholeentry3489]

Both questions have puzzled me for decades. Think I'll take a long motorcycle ride and pay a visit to the UFO museum in Roswell, NM.

[@davidberry8431]

Good questions. The Bible says God made the universe out of nothing. He had to have made Time also, whatever it is. We humans can't fathom such concepts as no end to time or no end to the universe. But there has to be an end...right? God said there is no end of time for us. We are eternal beings placed in temporary bodies for a short period of time.

[@blulagoon21]

@@davidberry8431 And, If scientists and their followers believe the big bang is true and without proof, then it becomes a religion, right ?

[@massacred666]

@@blulagoon21 it does sound like it, however there's a difference in the meaning of the words, which is a little confusing. Like how you and I might see the colour orange, but to me it's a bit more yellow, so I'd call it yellow, and you see more red so you call it red. When scientists say, "we know that this is true", it's not normally meant in the same way as everyone else would use the word. It's closer to, "this is the best possible answer we have based on what we've measured, and we've done a lot of measurements, but if we end up measuring something different in the future then we probably got it wrong to start with and we'll change it". If we had an example in a religious context, it might be something like if a really, really old version of the Bible was found and there were different commandments, people would have to abandon the ones that they have lived by and believe to be true. Although it's not true by any means that all scientists always drop their gut feelings that something is right, unless it's proven to be true via some form of measurement (and these can be extremely complicated! Often requiring a lot of study to understand!), the gut feelings people have don't really affect science as a whole. What's kinda cool it's that they often inspire views that are entirely opposite, which other people set out to measure and prove. A bit like how religions separate from eachother when they disagree, but if each group disagreed on how tall a mountain is and both groups go away and measure it themselves. It's often hard to stop ourselves, as humans, getting overconfident. There are all sorts of documented psychology rules that have been found on how our brains make bad judgements, like how we subconsciously ignore things that don't agree with us (and that goes for some scientists), so it's useful for us to always think which way might we have been wrong so far. If the answer is that we're sure of something, then we're almost certainly wrong about it.

[@nuoiptertermer4484]

@brian jackson It may be that no one you know of answered what triggered the big bang, but that doesn't mean no one has. It could be that the big bang was the beginning of time, so nothing triggered it. There did not need to be any time for it to happen. It's an instant.

[@johnmalayny2437]

Woot Dr. Don is safe from CV! Glad to see another video! Stay safe!

[@regfries8279]

Absolutely fascinating. I don’t have a science background, so I’m sorry if this is a dumb question. If the known laws of physics didn’t exist between t=0 and t=10^-43 seconds, how do we know what time itself was like during that interval? In the timeline this video is based upon, couldn’t time itself have been elastic or even completely indefinable during that period?

[@drsatan3231]

That was the inflation epoch. The laws of physics we have now didn't exist back then. There was only the inflation quantum field at that point. The four fundamental forces were created as the inflation quantum field decayed after the inflation epoch ended

[@ahsnsb]

"it's *not* a sin to not know something, it's only a sin if you think you know when you _clearly_ don't"

[@stevebrindle1724]

There is no such thing as sin where ideas are concerned unless of course, you are an idiot who believes in fairy tale gods and prophets like the child molester Mohammed!

[@Freestyler-rr]

@@stevebrindle1724 He was just quoting Dr. Don... and your response to it shows how much of a moron you are.

[@iSimple1111]

@@Freestyler-rr I agree with you in the fact he may have been confused, however, we must acknowledge the fact that he makes a good point.

[@jacksonlarson6099]

@@stevebrindle1724 Oh jeeze. Buddy, I'd be on your side if you weren't an ignorant asshole. By all accounts, Jesus and Mohammed were real people. There is a great deal of primary documentation that attests to this. The secular approach to these characters is simply that they weren't much different from modern cult leaders, except that they became extremely popular. But it's just plain silly to say that Muhammed is a fairytale.

[@ThuyTran-ci2et]

This is such a great video explaining very complex ideas to the general public. Thank you ! I just subscribed based on the quality of this vid.

[@vicg5323]

Awesome to have freely lectures that were once limited to the priviledged few. The Spice must flow.

[@mitchellc4]

The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.

[@techgamer1597]

@@mitchellc4 ok

[@officialcartoonsgallery4539]

@@mitchellc4 🤡

[@pauleveritt3388]

Would you revisit the topic of this video based on JWST observations? Does this video need an update?

[@soonertee]

For me the question isn't what happened, but where did even a single particle of any kind come from to begin with. Great video, keep it up!

[@fdarwiche2125]

from God Allah !🤍

[@3DGvisuals]

Particle/antiparticles appear and disappear from the universe every day, so it's not unprecedented. Hawking Radiation is because of this.

[@soonertee]

@@3DGvisuals So you're saying particles just make themselves from nothing all of the time? That is too pat of an answer, there is no scientific proof of that. There may be theories, but nothing that can be recreated in a lab or actually observed in space.

[@3DGvisuals]

@@soonertee Hawking Radiation was theoretical for years, but has now been observed

[@davidberry8431]

Like atoms and their electrons and what they're made from and....

[@ak203]

I found this well done and fascinating but have a question I never thought I'd consider: what's the importance and value on knowing all this?

[@Blue1Sapphire]

Not a lot of value if u are an evolutionist .. .in the end u just die anyways and all that knowledge means nothing. On the other hand if u believe in a Creator, u marvel at His creative abilities and His plan for His creation. This in turn gives u hope of something better after death. Afterall Jesus is a historical figure that died & rose again. To dismiss this lightly seems rather foolish to me.

[@sueouzounis9439]

I can't see any value. Look at a jar of smarties, now drop the jar.

[@ak203]

@@Blue1Sapphire Not all of us are convinced that Jesus rose again you know. And why for only 3 days? The accounts of this alleged event came about 80 years after it is supposed to have happened.

[@Blue1Sapphire]

@@ak203 yes of course all are not convinced. This is the reason He said, "many are called, but few are chosen."

[@marxoulis]

@@Blue1Sapphire Yes, he did all that and then he had nothing else to do, got bored and started being interested on whether you like your neighbour's wife. Makes sense.

[@Andrew-zq3ip]

I submit that when your measuring events at a trillionth of a trillionth of a second, nothing is happening "slowly"

[@paulyadav2288]

Thank you for your honesty!