FINALLY The S-500!

Go check out kommandostore.com/covertcabal
Sign up for their mailing list and get 10% off first order!
We started a Podcast - Tac Ops - / tacops - or find it on any typical podcast location
For Business Inquires - [e-mail]
If you'd like to help support me continue to create videos, you can do so here...
Patreon (Monthly) - / covertcabal
PayPayl (One Time Donations) - www.paypal.me/covertcabal
Discord - / discord
Names at the end are of supporters at Silver Level on Patreon, and $10 or more on PayPal
If you would like to have your name kept private, feel free to send me an email, or contact me through Patreon
Amazon Prime 30 Free Trial - amzn.to/2AiNfvJ
Microphone I use = amzn.to/2zYFz1D
Video Editor = amzn.to/2JLqX5o
Military Aircraft Models = amzn.to/2A3NPxu
Military Strategy Book = amzn.to/2AaqwST
----------------------------------
Credits:
Footage:
Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
The NATO Channel
Ministry of Defence of Estonia
Department of Defense (US)
"The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement."
KCNA - North Korea State Media
Music:
BTS Prolog - Kevin MacLeod - incompetech.com
creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
BAZ-6909 Image
Author: Vitaly V. Kuzmin
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en

[@hughlevantjames905]

Yeah, my neighbor too threatens me with ballistic missiles. Hopefully KommandoStore and the S-500 Prometheus will fix this problem.

[@birthdwt8859]

Put legos on his lawn

[@victorrenevaldiviasoto9728]

What about Nord VPN? And raid shadow legends? Do they help with ballistic missile threats?

[@konstantinoskountousias3099]

the best will be to nuke him first

[@annelisemeier283]

Ivan can’t even nitrogen purge fucking NVG tubes, god forbid you buy anything that is supposed to actually do anything other than exist.

[@NoBullNate]

I feel like the KommandoStore ad got edited.

[@Ken-no5ip]

This’ll come handy when my neighbor flies his little drone copter over my house...

[@rogerwehbe182]

😂

[@ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869]

If kill is good Overkill is better

[@nesseihtgnay9419]

If it works

[@mdem2040]

🤣🤣

[@quisqueyanguy120]

That thing can even shoot down satellites, lol

[@randomstuff5562]

Once s2000 comes, it'll be able to shoot down missiles and planes before they are even constructed

[@birthdwt8859]

S0000 will be able to time travel back to the person who developed the target.

[@mauser98kar]

Temporal missiles.

[@ilijabosnjak76]

😂

[@breadman32398]

almost as good as the anti-RPG systems on vehicles that detect and destroy RPGs before they're even fired by the user.

[@richardkammerer2814]

That’s impossi………………….

[@blu5543]

Getting excited about a weapons system... Within every man is a 7 year old and it's great.

[@hughlevantjames905]

ayy

[@gebys4559]

If not for the shit salaries, I would have loved to go into missile development. It's just such intricate and extreme engineering, utterly pointless to human development but yet so satisfying.

[@Odin31b]

I remember discussing the apache helicopter with friends in elementary school. Maybe you're correct.

[@birthdwt8859]

@@gebys4559 what sorts of projects do you enjoy instead?

[@Panicscroll69]

That’s hilarious, I’ve had that backwards for years 😂

[@carlstanland5333]

Watching Russian missile launches in snow always has an 80’s vibe to me.

[@TheCJUN]

'Spies Like Us'

[@Sh4d891]

@@daltonv5206 Wolveriiiiines

[@billjames8036]

@@TheCJUN Haha was thinking the exact same thing.... ;-)

[@freedomfrogs4847]

We'll offset global warming with some good old nuclear winter

[@lc9245]

​@@JigilJigil F-16 and F-15 still rule the sky, completely undefeated. Both were designed in the 70s so they can be considered 60s technology with modern gadgets.

[@theluftwaffle1]

Binkov releases a 50 second video.. mean while here we get a full 11 minutes. Awww yeah

[@kameronjones7139]

I have generally preferred this channel

[@theluftwaffle1]

@@kameronjones7139 As do I. Binkov focuses more on being entertaining, but sometimes gets his information wrong. Cabal goes all in on his topic.

[@d.j.9095]

There's a sweet spot between informative and entertaining. 11 mins is not that spot. Still upvoted though.

[@Jay-bf8yp]

I like both. Binkov gets into wargaming stuff, emphasizing the geographic and social implications of the scenarios he looks at. I'm not into the fantasy stuff (Modern supercarrier vs Japanese Navy), but I like his analysis of how potential modern conflicts could play out. I like this channel too. Little fluff and information is expressed very efficiently.

[@julwiezdeghorz5089]

Binkov prefers fairy tales. He is even very late for the Sukoi LTS 😊

[@sethgaston8347]

Normal people love watching vids of cars they’ll never afford. I love watching vids of military tech, that I’d have to steal to use.

[@ThatCarGuy]

I do both... lol

[@dhurjatinarayangiri1590]

I watch because our army can buy it

[@sethgaston8347]

@@ThatCarGuy The name says it all my friend 😁

[@sethgaston8347]

@@dhurjatinarayangiri1590 Where you from bro, your name sounds Desi 😎

[@sethgaston8347]

@Tanveer Ahmed Tantray Facts 💯

[@serghw]

S-500 main purpose is to intercept priority targets, such as: awacs planes on 500km+ distances, warheads on final part of trajectory, low orbit intelligence satellites and etc. F22/35 or any other jets are not priority targets for this system, with them will handle S-400, S-350, S-300, Buk, Thor and Pantsir, depend on distances.

[@joshc.1871]

But all of those will be destroyed by cheap Turkish drones and Israeli suicide drones. And the Russian ppl will still live on 13000 USD a year. 🤣 Which Western country are you living in?

[@serghw]

@@joshc.1871, i live in Moscow - the capital of Russia ))) You, buddy, should more use your own brain instead of listening the trash-talks from the west politicians. And of course, should watch west TV less than you actually do it. Dollar of course is the powerful weapon, but missiles are better in many occasions)))

[@CDSAfghan]

​@@serghw Watch the footage. You can easily see many russian systems being defeated in Syria and Armenia. Turkey is in Nato, you think that we won't pull apart and study the S400? Like we did in Greece with the S300. NATO pilots train against Russian/Soviet aircraft, and A2D weapons, while Russian pilots are lucky if they get 100hrs a year. Let's be real Russia is an arms dealer now. You sell your subs to india, your carriers to China, air defense to Turkey. How is the Kutznesov doing? Rumour has it you'll sell an S500 to india and we'll make a big deal about how we don't want them purchasing it, but the truth is we'll soon see every detail about it if we haven't already. Russia can't even make modern jets without partnerships and when those fail the jet gets shelved.

[@CDSAfghan]

And no one worships the dollar more than Russian politicians

[@SFDPSFDP]

@@CDSAfghan The US still has no tactical answer to the S-400, all the currently operational air to ground missiles and smart bombs are ineffective against it . Besides Turkey (despite obsolete nato membership) is closer to Russia now and has no interest whatsoever to share any sensitive information with the US given the recent history of their relationships ( state coup, syria etc) and their exclusion from the F35 tech sharing. They would weaken themselves by doing that anyways, they just bought it, why would they be dumb enough to reveal its secret and lose trust from Russia for no gain.

[@LewisPalmer1234]

My neighbor recently purchased several D26 ballistic missiles so this will come in handy

[@mnemonicpie]

Imagine a situation in the hood💀

[@andresmartinezramos7513]

​@@mnemonicpieThere are SSBNs in the pools

[@emmy.eyoung8076]

This is a serious treat to birds having fun around the neighborhood

[@vitalegvitalegov]

No they use ecology friendly fuel.

[@sjwarialaw8155]

@@vitalegvitalegov carbon free?

[@shinchan-F-urmom]

**Since I bought a big ass gun, all the bullies in my neighborhood suddenly turned quite polite....hmmm I wonder why**

[@miltonjmj]

It's going to be canonized as a saint by the Russian orthodox Church.

[@valeremkin5188]

Correct as US and EU are Satanic cultures.

[@leonhardsatriasuharjo1644]

At the end, every air defense system has their own strength and weaknesses. Even the top line air defences has either the speciality to defend against cruise missile, aircraft, or ballistic missile

[@gahdhsh623]

thats why you have to combine and support them with other tech

[@Volodymyr_SVD]

Actually China recently kind of developed interesting thing for ships (but may be done on other platforms as well). So the main benefit of this system is that it has 8 launch pods and 3 types of rockets, one against huge missiles (ballistic or cruise ones), second for height altitude or long range jets, third type is placed as 4 in one pod (meaning that it fit in 1 pod but those are 4 rockets) and those required to shutdown fast but close targets like ones which gone though first two types of rockets. So all together it allows to target any type of threads from singe lunch station which is sound pretty cool. Anyway those are marketing information, how good those rockets and target lock systems we don't know and I hope that we will never know. Make love, not war, peace brothers!

[@benromign7612]

@@Volodymyr_SVD Yup, American Arleigh Burke destroyers started that decades ago. Chinese copied the design. Like they do with everything else.

[@benromign7612]

@otto Lincoln like what? Please, name what was copied?

[@dianapennepacker6854]

Probably for the best. You can't make one for all. Small drones to slow moving aircraft for instance definitely should not be using missiles. The S 500... The size of thing is outstanding to me.

[@Zarathustra-H-]

I'll believe the S-500's prowess when I see it in action. Until that time, it's just more vaporware, like the T14 Armata and the SU-57. Heck, its predecessors the S300 and S400 have been pretty underwhelming, as has the Pantsir. It can't even target low and slow flying drones in Ukraine, something it was specifically designed for. Russian military equipment since the cold war appears to be more propaganda than anything else. It fails once it hits the field,

[@romanpyatibratov4361]

Same goes for NATO's Javelins, Stingers, M177, HIMARIS and any other weaponry, that sent to Ukraine. As they not stopping "Russian military equipment, that appears to be more propaganda than anything else". Modern warfare is a battle of cost effectivness. You can spend $10mil rocket to take down a $5mil drone, but it is not a great outcome. And all videos i watched, where S300 or S400 were shown "underwhelming" are in scenarios against overwhelmingly bigger threat both in numbers and cost. Like 20 tomahawk missiles and 10 F-35 with bunch of expensive rockets. With total cost of literal $billions destroyed S-400 system with couple buks, pantsir and other AA systems with total cost less than a $billion. Nobody says S-300, S-400, S-500 is unkillable complex of unpenetrable defense. It's just these complex systems are the BEST in terms of quality and cost. I havent watched much about Patriot systems. But i know for a fact - its more expensive. Even if Patriot is better than S-400, but more expensive. 5 Patriots will perform worse, than 10 S-400. And why buy 5 Patriots if you can get 10 S-400 for the same price? (numbers are not exact, just to show an example). P.S. i actually googled it. First article CNBC tells that S-400 complex costs $500mil. While patriot battery costs $1bil. Funny that i actually got numbers somewhat correct xD

[@akanoob2072]

By this logic, Western equipment is mostly propaganda too. We don't have more credibility by default.

[@RegulatorSevenZeroSeven]

I was under the impression that the reason TB2's did so well in the early days was because the Russian AA wasn't even looking for targets as their commanding officers were lied to by command that Russia achieved total air superiority.

[@RegulatorSevenZeroSeven]

However the Pantsir being a disappointment is also very likely.

[@akanoob2072]

@@RegulatorSevenZeroSeven look, even the Patriot is a "dissapointment" if you hold it to difficult criteria. Air defense units aren't made to be 100% effective. Even the Iron Dome has a 90% chance that reduces if overwhelmed. If 1000 grad rockets are fired, about 100 will pass through. Does that make it a bad AA System if something passed through? Absolutely not.

[@heatherdark3387]

1:01 to 1:04 randomly cuts all audio, not sure how or why

[@rradical4714]

i noticed the same and was looking for your comment!

[@LewisPalmer1234]

Same

[@jamesrocket5616]

Same

[@lanzortiz3199]

Finally. I ordered one last night, they said it's already been ship. Now i can shoot down my neighbors annoying drone, despite multiple warning they kept violating our backyards airspace. My options were the j-20 or this, but i realized building a runway for the j-20 was very costly.

[@dashknow5082]

you pick the right choice bud

[@marat8584]

That's correct - the 77N6 missiles shown in the video are designed to intercept other missiles (short range ballistic, gliders, possibly ICBM warheads during re-entry). The anti-aircraft missile is called 40N6M and is an improved version of the S-400's 40N6. The S-500 system (launcher, radar, etc.) in its anti-aircraft configuration will most likely look just like the S-400 with an improved radar and improved long-range missiles that are derived directly from their predecessors. Also, while A-235 is essentially a Russian's GBI, the anti-missile configuration of the S-500 is said to be able to work as a part of the A-235 system by adding a THAAD-like final defense layer.

[@aadil6617]

I have ordered 5 for my lovely family!

[@FusionC6]

what a lucky family!

[@guestimator121]

For them, or against them? :-)

[@aguynamedscott11]

Damn, being a passenger on a Ukrainian airline just got a lot more dangerous.

[@ignaciomunizdiaz5194]

Ukranian air defence ( the ones Who shootdown the mh17) never will have this beauty

[@madara8918]

Ukraine shot down their own plane? Got a source for that claim amigo?

[@ignaciomunizdiaz5194]

@@madara8918 They be so incompetent to do that. They have shootdown the malasian mh17 and the siberian ones. Sorry they shootdown the mh17 on porpouse to justify the biden's war

[@mattatenta1444]

@@ignaciomunizdiaz5194 MH17 happened before Biden's presidency?

[@ignaciomunizdiaz5194]

@@mattatenta1444 LOL... THE NUDLAND PAPPERS PROOF WHO BE JOE BIDEN THE ONE WHO ORDERS THE UKRANIAN COUP AND DICTACTORSHIP. OBAMA ONLY WAS THEIR PUPPET

[@deanyt3697]

Thank you for the research in this video!

[@gebys4559]

Nice one! At 7:20 you managed to say Iranian that sounded almost correct and no like Aye, ranian.

[@sancrosanct5070]

Oh my God finally!!! My neighborhood has been in a cold war for the last month. My worst one already has a B-2 spirit raider. This'll come in handy keeping it away from my home.

[@MironBleek]

We need video about A-235 and russian anti-ICBM defences.

[@AOErocks3832]

Last time I was this early, Hitler had just invaded the USSR

[@johnsilver9338]

Its similar to THAAD, its a mid tier ballistic interceptor. Highest altitude it can go is 200 km if im not wrong, while THAAD at 150 km. Probably will be used in conjunction with the A-135, or the A-235 once it comes out, as a dedicated ABM. For SRBM this will do, or as another line of defense if its bigger brothers failed to intercept MRBM, IRBM, and ICBMs.

[@bluemarlin8138]

THAAD’s official ceiling is 150km, but we don’t know if it’s greater in actuality. Either way, THAAD-ER will be operational in a few years and should close any real or perceived gap. SM-3’s ceiling is supposedly 160 km, but again, that’s “official” and is being improved. Ruzzia still has no analogue for either GBMD for midcourse intercepts, or PAC-3 for point defense (which as we can see, is pretty impressive and vastly improved over older versions). Nor does Ruzzia have anything close to the SM-6, which can hit maneuvering fighter-sized targets at 450km, and is much more maneuverable than S-400’s longest ranged missile. These AEGIS systems also come with much more powerful radars than the Ruzzian systems because (1) the US radar tech is better, and (2) they can draw power from a whole ship (or ground installation) instead of just a truck mounted launcher. PAC-2 may not have great range, but it’s certainly not bad range. Long range anti-aircraft work over land is what the USAF is for.

[@johnsilver9338]

@@bluemarlin8138 THAAD-ER won't likely be purchased as that would defeat the purpose of Aegis SM-3 Block 1. SM-3 Block 1A can reach 600km altitude. While Block IIA can reach 1450km to 2350km as ICBMs will climb that high. Hence why SM-3 can also be used as an ASAT missile targeting LEO satallites.

[@KHETTIUS]

one thing that was very noticeable from this video, was how quickly the s500 missiles accelerated compared to all the other systems shown, other than that, you can only speculate about it's true capabilities. maybe Russia has figured out a way to accurately track stealth aircraft, maybe they haven't, maybe they figured a way to make a single missile perform well against multiple target types, maybe they haven't.

[@KHETTIUS]

@@paulbarclay4114 Is there a source for this? i find this highly unlikely, but not at all impossible.

[@odinSvobodyiNik]

@@KHETTIUS "stealth" is a meme. it's working only, if your enemy have only one radar with specific working wave-length in operational area. if enemy have at least two or/and with different working wave-length, then "stealth" become useless. If you'll look into complectation of S-400, you'll see that there few different radars for detection of targets with different working wavelengths, and there are bunch of different radars that could be added to standart stack.

[@ytsks]

@@paulbarclay4114 sure they did.

[@mnemonicpie]

Great analysis, you should create your own channel

[@bakinginc.3844]

maybe but i would like to know how they know that it would funktion even tho they dont have any stealth fighters for testing

[@nikk7545]

I hope the civilian version of these will be available soon here in u.s. I'm so excited to finally have this

[@digimaks]

I'm sure it might be useful against BLM rioters ))))

[@user-tl2cs6wv8b]

@@digimaks A sling shot with a good amount of pebbles works fine against protestors imo.

[@user-fm6py7fr5x]

Для вас будет супер высокоточная версия, которая стреляет только по афганским свадьбам ....

[@omskpravo55]

​@@digimaksпротив ЛГБТ и БЛМ, нужно использовать дубину и огонь.

[@gapant69]

Yeah, can’t hunt ducks without this bad boy 😊

[@eslSlightz]

The S-500 is using a new type of warhead: A so called cope-head 🥸🤭

[@zinjanthropus322]

There's a chance atleast one of the missile variants has multiple warheads to engage low altitude threats with greater reaction speed than the s400.

[@sjwarialaw8155]

I truly doubt that because there's really no point, they have a lot o other anti-air missile systems that do that already. This missiles are way too big and expensive to be used against unreliable target acquisitions.

[@zinjanthropus322]

@@sjwarialaw8155 The larger missile could carry a larger radar to provide better target acquisition and provide a far longer range for the multiple short range missiles within. It would come in handy dealing with large fleets of attack aircraft, drones or bombers.

[@sjwarialaw8155]

@@zinjanthropus322 won't deny that is a cool idea but I have serious doubts that any country has the technology to pull that of in an efficient way.

[@digimaks]

@@sjwarialaw8155 Yes you are correct. Appearance of S-500 doesn't mean they are planning to retire S-400 and S-300. S-500 is basically an ADDITION to the already existing capabilities.

[@Myungbean]

Russia's performance in Ukraine is showing that much of the performance of their weapons systems are wildly overblown, all bark and little bite...so color me highly doubtful until they're operationally proven.

[@elozinoemeovrode9779]

Yeah the propaganda war got you too…when the fog of war is over you will now how powerful their weapons are…

[@Myungbean]

@@elozinoemeovrode9779 if their systems are as powerful as they (and you) have claimed, then why not bring them in and end this decisively? Their struggle to achieve aerial superiority is the most glaring issue. With thr current state of their economy from sanctions, they can ill afford to prolong the conflict. For the "second" most powerful military in the world, they're looking incredibly inept right now. And it wouldn't be the first time there's been a revelation that Russia embellished its capabilities. The same thing happened after the USSR collapsed and the west got good looks at equipment inherited by breakaway SSRs.

[@quantumedits272]

@@Myungbean Russia has proven it can deploy hypersonic missiles whilst others only have them in concepts

[@Myungbean]

@@quantumedits272 True, but have you looked up the design of the Kinzhal? It's nothing particularly technically impressive. The US and China could probably build something very similar very quickly. It seems to share a stage with the Iskander SRBM, making the Kinzhal a glorified reentry vehicle, albeit one that's fire from a plane. When they break out the Avangard, then I'll be somewhat impressed.

[@rogue__agent5884]

Well no Most equipment used in Ukraine are outdated T-72B3 T-80 for example

[@baghlani92]

My neighbor doesn't threatened me with a ballistic missile no thank you 😂😂😂😂😂🤟🤟🤟🤟🤟

[@themacker894]

Nice analysis. Thanks for the video.

[@sylwiazielinski2153]

I haven't read the comment flow and maybe I'll repeat things others have already said. Your video lacks a lot of known info about the S-500 because it's usually in Russian. I know the language so I can add some useful insights. The S-500 WILL work in unison with the S-400 as an extra layer of defense. No, the radars for the new system are NOT an upgrade or a derivative of the S-400 radars such as the 'tombstone'. All radars are a completely new architecture with no common parts with the older systems. S-400 is after all an upgraded Soviet S-300. The S-500 search & track was tested extensively in Syria to debug the system and validate that the preset goals were met. Russian air defense thinking is based on a philosophy of a layered system divided between the air&space defense troops ( point defense) and the air defense of the ground forces in movement. S-500 will most likely come under the air&space air denese forces to protect important military and industrial targets.

[@freedomfrogs4847]

А, все одно, прикрывают, но не защищают

[@digimaks]

Satellites is one of its important capabilities.

[@buildindian8169]

I am more impressed with the capabilities of the transport trucks, boy the kind of load I could move with those ..

[@digimaks]

Think those trucks drink fuel like a horse.

[@buildindian8169]

@@digimaks hmmm we will use natural gas from Ukraine..cheap and clean

[@Desire123ification]

The S 500 key component is the warhead (a new multi-purpose explosive). As for one of the radars, it's similar to the IDF EL/M-2080 Green Pine or the US AN/TPY-2. (Over the Horizon type)

[@user-7165jdhrnxymzn]

Many people has been waiting the S-500 for sooooo long 😁 haha

[@willdavids7075]

How soon before China buys few and then has a whole fleet of them? Then we can buy one on eBay for $19.99 with free shipping.

[@zoka7108]

The HQ-26 already exists

[@hydrohasspoken6227]

Once you are spotted 600 miles away from a S500 system, it’s over.

[@thinhvcoin]

Russia: comes out with a new weapon system. Covert Cabal: it is shit and cannot do anything, btw American has something better or they are adding capabilities.

[@CosmicValkyrie]

I'm sure you already know this is all propaganda.

[@guestimator121]

+Thịnh Nguyễn Quang Your impression from watching this video is that Covert Cabal thinks this system is shit?

[@bnnnnnnnnnnn]

TBH screw them both

[@TheSnarkyViking]

Huh? If anything this channel tends to overstate Russian and Chinese capabilities and understate those of the US

[@ShivaTD420]

Yeh it's bunk propaganda, bout the only thing we know for sure is how dangerous they are to civilian aircraft.

[@Ganiscol]

Does Amazon sell these or do I have to look on Ebay?

[@mt1885]

Peace through strength -

[@christophermarkee5445]

Offer one hand an arm the other

[@DonVigaDeFierro]

- Peace through superior firepower.

[@QualityPen]

Level 1: Peace Level 2: Peace through strength Level 3: Peace through superior strength ... Level 100: Peace through total global thermonuclear annihilation Can’t break the peace if there’s nobody alive to break it.

[@christophermarkee5445]

@@QualityPen nukes are played out I want to see Rod's of God giant pieces of tungsten rods ramming into the Earth at Mach 5 now that would be something to see.☄

[@rzmonk76]

Russia has been getting a lot of real world practice over the years. You don’t get good playing basket ball against a 5 ft player. You play against someone good and either adapt or get run down.

[@ade_adegboye005]

Haven't seen S300 and S400 shot down any aircraft in Syria. Israel keeps ravaging Iranian proxies in the region.

[@victorzvyagintsev1325]

@@ade_adegboye005 To be fair, Israel uses Lebanon mountains as cover. SAMs are useless in such situations. All Syrians can do is shoot down incoming missiles.

[@harambetidepod1451]

Steel sharpens steel

[@PeterbFree]

Israel has a deal with Russia, for now. The Syrians however did shoot down an F35 with an upgraded old S200 system. The Israelis said it was a bird strike, but that the aircraft was damaged beyond repair…. So the Syrians shot at it, but a bird hit it….

[@ade_adegboye005]

@@PeterbFree I am still looking for images of wreakage /debris. That's a fake story. If it was true, the images will be a propaganda tool. For your information, bird strike is actually a bird strike. It's common. A KZbin search will help

[@ronelicabandi9706]

Nice next month s-500 plus then in another month s-500 ultra.

[@JohnMaxGriffin]

They’ll produce 8 missiles, take some pictures/video of them all in the same place, and then announce development of the S-600

[@userjlj]

i thought the next one will be the S22? that's quite a leap.. lol

[@r.p5380]

@@JohnMaxGriffin probably manufacture around 100 systems and set them up around Moscow and areas in Siberia

[@chieftainofthemoroccosindi1685]

@@JohnMaxGriffin No, you don't understand. S-300, S-400, S-500 is a designation of no more new weapons. This is an encrypted designation of the distances at which the complex is capable of conducting reconnaissance, etc. For example, the Russian "Pantsir" is designated as S1 Pantsir S1 is a short-range AA defense. Now they have the Pantsir S1M, this is a late modification of it. In the USSR, they tried to create the S-500 (we are talking about the distance) back in the 60s as a strategic stationary weapon. Today, for Russia, the S-500 is just a portable tactical weapon. The S-500 Almaz-Antey began to design it from scratch in 2002, during which time a huge number of prototypes were modernized many times).

[@deanyt3697]

That was a great ad. Love the intro lol

[@douglas69ification]

The Russians will probably claim to have a weapon that can blow up Jupiter

[@ethericboy]

FINALLY the S 500! Now I can get a good nights sleep again

[@connormoylan2466]

I'm guessing to solve the problem of possibility of kill solutions would be the same way they use the s-400 and have more then 3 in most groups, and not just that but they will be used alongside the s-400 and s-300

[@mahmoudkosa994]

I saw that S500 video 3 years ago and feels like yesterday .. feels old ❤️

[@Idontwantahandle6669]

The S-500 is designed to work in tandem with the S-400 in the same way the S-300 did for years. It's just now the S-400 will be dedicated to aircraft, while the S-500 will be primarily for ICBM's, though it isn't uncommon for Russia to deploy multiple launchers types in one battalion, as prior to the S-400, multiple variants of the S-300 would be deployed in the same unit.

[@blazinchalice]

Countermeasures and counter-tactics are evolving. AARGM-ER fired from standoff range will be able to take out targeting radar. These S series systems are vulnerable.

[@Pao234_]

Not if they shoot from far enough

[@perskarva123]

Amazing work.

[@ronmaximilian6953]

What about as a large missile for longer range and to have the size to put a proper AESA radar and the computing equipment to work with ground-based L-band, X-band, and s-band radars.

[@ravencookie5141]

That THAAD-like system ? Hell yeah!

[@kameronjones7139]

@HellYeaNixon the video controdicts that

[@themax9913]

@HellYeaNixon You misunderstood the video, the S-500 by design is not intended to engage small targets which will instead be engaged by the S-400 or SHORAD elements.

[@Nekminute]

Thaad sux donkey dong

[@jungtaemin1639]

@HellYeaNixon would you use a 120mm tank gun to kill a rabbit?

[@Clickathon]

THAAD = 900kg, 8x Launcher, 150km ceiling S-500 = 3000kg+ (guess), 2x launcher Not very alike...

[@sakshammishra8291]

Everyone covers S-500 in detail and no one looking at Su-75. It seems everyone thinks it's not gonna work

[@ebek4806]

Everyone been waiting for the S-500 for a decades now. Su-75 is intended for export and will only be relevant if someone orders it that's why no one currently cares

[@themax9913]

The Su-75 for now is only a mock-up, prototypes are planned for later and it’s only then that speculations will be possible with it. I do believe it has a great potential but I think the price will be higher than 30M$ (likely 60M$ at least) and it needs to have guarantees of being successful at exportation cause otherwise it’s money thrown down the bin. Russia could buy some once it enter service to influence further buyers but it could be a gamble with no further foreign purchase, only time will tell.

[@QualityPen]

Russia wanted to have a deal to export the Su-57 to India, but India didn’t want to help fund the development unless it also got the blueprints.

[@lukabogdanovic4658]

@@themax9913 the Russian goverment wants to buy the SU 75's

[@themax9913]

@@lukabogdanovic4658 No, the russian government did not say anything about it yet. The su-75 is a private veinture by the UAC and they are still looking for investment which is why they are so much willing to get guarantees of export.

[@anthonyfarrell7720]

7:26 Wow, I sure am enjoying camping here in this desert. 7:27 Wow, I am now chunky soup.

[@Ariez05]

US: Don't you dare do it TURKEY: Start's mass production of the new S-500

[@billwhoever2830]

I know that this is a meme but Russia doesnt allow anyone to build their SAMs under license, not even China. The funny part is that the main SAMs of China are copied and later improved Russian s300 missiles.

[@Ariez05]

@@billwhoever2830 Turkey and Russia already agreed that Turkey will do (Joint-production) of the S-500 search it up

[@timnik3570]

@@Ariez05 Это ложь. Россия не будет продавать С500 пока не будет С600 и производить и делиться технологиями тем более.

[@Mike-rt1vh]

@@Ariez05 turkey is a poker face

[@shinchan-F-urmom]

If that missile has a *Solid Fuled Ducted Ramjet Engine* like Meteor Missile, then it will be smaller and also agile against all planes. It will be a killer.

[@themax9913]

For the altitude it would operate at, and the speed of targets it would need to intercept, a Scramjet might be more reliable than a ramjet, a mix of the 2 would be ideal but hard to make compact.

[@DonVigaDeFierro]

@@themax9913 Ye, but the technology is fairly simple in principle, so it's not unlikely they have already a technology demonstrator of some sort with a small size.

[@themax9913]

@@DonVigaDeFierro In principle, the technology is achievable, for both ramjet & scramjet, however, a mix of the 2 (to operate in both environment) would be better, and that one is harder to achieve and minaturise, tho i believe russia could do it with some effort, just like the US or France could.

[@quinndenver4075]

What does the type of engine it have have to do with its maneuverability characteristics?. A similar U.S system already in use, the sm-3 missile that is part of the USN AEGIS system uses a separate kinetic kill vehicle in its terminal stage that has lateral thrusters to rapidly change course at Mach 12+

[@trolleriffic]

​@@quinndenver4075 A rocket-ramjet can achieve significantly higher specific impulse (kinda like fuel efficiency for reaction engines) than a regular rocket engine, and it can burn for longer using a given mass of fuel. Lots of guided missiles have a rocket engine which only burns for a short period (8 seconds for the AIM-120C) so beyond fairly short ranges, most of the flight will be unpowered as the missile glides towards the target. Problem is that manoeuvres impose a large drag penalty which slows the missile down even more, and control surfaces get less effective as the speed drops so it doesn't take much manoeuvring to kill the performance and range of the missile. Since a rocket-ramjet can burn for much longer, the missile can still be in powered flight when it starts manoeuvring to intercept a target that's trying to evade. This allows it to maintain speed and performance even at long ranges.

[@antoniooceguera1996]

If it was so true why Russia isn’t in control of Ukrainian 🤔🤔🤔

[@qunaaqsteenholdt6314]

It can also be used for meteors, it was mentioned in another video...

[@HM-wv2ft]

S-500 works against several target types but its obvious that it is the ABM complement to the S-400.

[@ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869]

Hey, you just referred to my favourite hiking pack as an artefact.

[@lando1296]

Russia: We built the S-500, good luck getting out our airspace now. F-22: Hold my stealth.

[@johnnyrvf]

How many F22’s will have to be downed before you change your mind?

[@Alex-jy5fo]

The S-500 has a powerful radar detection system. So an F-22 would be intercepted easily.

[@DonVigaDeFierro]

I mean, stealth is not a magical invisibility cloak that lets you just bypass missile defense systems.

[@Petrezen1982]

@@DonVigaDeFierro bypass older defense systems**. Newer radars can see them.

[@greattribulation1388]

Technically every radar can “see” them, but it looks too ambiguous to be confirmed to be a jet. The only way any nation can confirm what it is, is by knowing when stealth aircraft have launched from carriers or seen leaving bases.

[@kgboftheussr3856]

Russia : Releases video of S-500 *India : I see new toys...how much you selling them for :)*

[@greattribulation1388]

You need to do a video on the new laser tech coming out. The one where a pulse a fraction of a second long with a huge range given the right conditions.

[@GeFlixes]

For some reason, Covert Cabal videos always have me in the mood to play ICBM and cover the world in nuclear warheads.

[@sjwarialaw8155]

Oh... I'm always in that mood... ;)

[@FlyWithMe_666]

Respect to the cosmonauts flying on these rockets to space. Doesn’t look too safe.

[@thomassimeon3138]

No Rockets ever used to take humans in space are safe, what's your point? Though Russian rocket engines are considered the best in the world, even the u.s used them for there space missions

[@TheWorldEnd2]

@@thomassimeon3138 The joke ------------------------------------------> _________________You______________

[@vadrak6197]

Doesn't look safe? lol Soyuz is the most safe system in the world for transporting men into orbit. And US still using russian rocket engines for their space program.

[@themax9913]

@@vadrak6197 Not anymore since SpaceX use its own manufactured engines on their own boosters & vehicles, and they did transport astronauts & spationauts (european counterpart) to the ISS.

[@graniteamerican3547]

for anyone who cant get the joke, hes calling the s-500 a spaceship. implying that there is a man inside piloting it. it doesn't look safe because its a missle.

[@Mrgunsngear]

Thanks

[@Steve-Utah]

Need one this Christmas

[@adithyavasudevan4036]

The S10000 is already here. It goes into the Future to check what happens then returns to undo the past.

[@box5319]

These "S" missiles are the reason why america couldn't fine oil in Russia although its plenty over there

[@maidatenpulamea]

And yet a German light plane landed in Red Square making a joke of what, at that time, was the most protected airspace in the world. Trusting russian products is a countdown to failure.

[@peaceiriere2418]

@@maidatenpulamea Delusional Troll

[@maidatenpulamea]

@@peaceiriere2418 go troll the history books u bluepill. The truth will set you free.

[@oculosprudentium8486]

At 2:38 did you see the high speed rod flying across the screen from the right? They are occasionally caught on film and they seem to favor military stuff

[@jackflash128]

2:43

[@omarpatriotsfan606]

Thank you for taking the time to put this together!

[@EasternVikingTradeCompanyJSC]

S-500 was designed to defeat middle range missiles at first place

[@joselee9605]

They could’ve named them using 1, 2 ,3 , 4 etc, but there’s just something about using hundreds that make it that much more intimidating

[@Mike-rt1vh]

F16,18, 22, 35s...

[@digimaks]

It stands for some sort of coding of the system. They started with S-50 systems back in the day, (but it had a nickname instead). There were S-100. For example Syria still has S-250. Remember when Trump has ordered to launch cruise missile strike on Syria - 47 cruise missiles- the quarter of those tomohawks were shot down by these good old S-250. The rest were taken down by S-300 both, by Russian and Syrian defense. Only 7 were not shot down, because they fell somewhere in the desert.

[@mnemonicpie]

No, there are actually 1,2,3 etc... Hundreds just stands for a major update

[@History_Matters]

Finally , I was waiting this video

[@DANI-of3jm]

THANKS AND LOVE SIR SOME UPDATE ON SU 75 IF POSSIBLE

[@krisfrederick5001]

I didn't know I was waiting for it!

[@zerg9523]

Perfect, i can finally get a surplus 400…

[@bombheadgames9565]

What is the blob on a stick for? So that kamikaze drones coming in at 300 km/h at tree-top height have something to spot it by from 10 km away .. This chariot is made for a type of war long since obsolete .. That of high flying large fighter-bombers.

[@Lhasa101]

Does anyone have an idea of what the object is streaking from right to left at approx. 2:42 on the timer is??

[@AdamAdamHDL]

I know how the system really works. Russia developed a stare amplifier. Think of it like a megaphone for facial expressions. So the S-500 detects a threat and then Vladmir Putin stares into the amplifier. Anything is immediately deterred. Planes, missiles, comets. It's been said that entire air armada's just crash as a result.

[@sjwarialaw8155]

Can't argue against that. Sounds like it could be true.

[@dunneemofozilla4596]

Putin still has a lot to live up to. S400 have Stalinium warheads, no one's ever invented Putinium yet

[@FUL0H8]

I can’t wait for the S-600! Hurry up!

[@test-qz4dq]

Im already waiting for s-700 😏

[@chahineyalla4838]

Those modern missiles are so darn fast in their first few seconds of flight... I wonder if they can still improve on that, and how much.

[@bezahltersystemtroll5055]

S-800 will shoot down comets and asteroids 😱

[@giggling_boatswain]

That is why the Russians rolled out the new Abakan missile system for work with ballistic targets at the Army-2021 exhibition. Abakan is the world's first specialized anti-aircraft missile system designed to combat high-speed high-altitude targets with ballistic trajectories. Before "Abakan", no one had created specialized anti-aircraft missile systems in the world. The composition of "Abakan" is as follows: unified multifunctional radar (UMR) for reconnaissance and target designation for the guidance of missiles 98L6AE "Yenisei-E"; up to four 51P6E2 launchers with 9M82MDE missiles; power supply means. Launcher (PU) "Abakan" - from the anti-aircraft missile system S-300V4. Its export version is called Antey-2500. This launcher in "Abakan" is only switched from a caterpillar to a wheeled one. As a rule, caterpillars are not encouraging to potential customers in the Middle East, and this is not least due to the nature of the terrain. The 9M82MDE missile is a modified version of the product also from the S-300V4 air defense missile system. It is sometimes referred to as a "heavy" rocket. If there are several Abakan air defense systems in the grouping, it can be assigned a command post (command post). The performance characteristics of the Abakan air defense system are as follows: firing range at ballistic targets (min / max, km) - 12/40; target height (min / max, km) - 2/30; target speed - up to 4000 m / s; the number of simultaneously tracked targets and missiles aimed at them is 4/8. The maximum height of the hitting ballistic targets of 30 km looks, at first glance, relatively small. However, when individual developers claim that they will make systems with a height of destruction of ballistic objects of 70-80 km, then statements of this kind raise certain doubts. The fact is that at altitudes of more than 50 km, due to the rarefaction of the air, the aerodynamic rudders of the rocket become ineffective. Beyond this border of altitude, there is already a completely different environment. And it is necessary to make for a rocket or shunting engines, and control the product using gas rudders. Technically, it is possible to solve a similar problem. Only the price of the rocket in this case will be completely different. It is noteworthy that the "Yenisei-E" UMR steadily accompanies air objects with a very small reflective surface - about 0.01 sq. m. In the mode of firing at ballistic targets "Yenisei" is intended for search, detection, capture and tracking, recognition by trajectory signs for issuing target designation at high-altitude and high-speed targets to 51P6E2 launchers with 9M82MDE missiles. Another undoubted advantage of "Abakan" (in view of its narrow specialization) is the minimum composition of combat units and vehicles, as well as personnel of the combat crew - 4 people.

[@narmale]

was that audio mute at the 1:00 mark on purpose or youtube censoring ?

[@acidbot6681]

Russian cold launch system for missiles is a work of art.

[@kameronjones7139]

With so few missiles I am not sure how effective it will be. I mean the thaad and pac3 carriers 4 -8 times as many missiles (8-16) per launcher. This is a massive deal when going up against ballistic missile or any other fast target

[@gebys4559]

They do completely different jobs, THAAD targets things moving parabolically whilst patriots missiles have lower range, ceiling and top speed of the target.

[@kameronjones7139]

@@gebys4559 obviously,they are meant to work in tandem when destroying ballistic type targets however you are completely missing the point of what I am saying. I was not comparing the thaad and pac3 I was saying that in there field the s500 is very under gunned when compared to them when dealing with fast targets. That is my point

[@vadrak6197]

Both THAAD and PAC 3 have significant less capabilities than S-500. The latter is significant larger missile because has a lot more range and flight altitude and speed almost twice as much of that of THAAD and that requires a lot bigger booster. The S-500 is a category on its own, between a THAAD and a GMD or S-400 and A-235. The S-500 is also reported to be capable of carrying a variant of the 53T6M missile which is part of the A-235 silo ABM system.

[@kameronjones7139]

@@vadrak6197 oh really? Based off of what statistic are you getting this from? Also you are still flat out ignoring that it only has 2 missiles even if it some how has a significantly higher hit rate (which it hasn't proven to ) it still won't do much because again it had two missiles per launcher

[@themax9913]

@@kameronjones7139 Well, the amount of missiles carried by a TEL is not really a concern, TEL are far from being the most expensive part of an air defense system and you can just assign more TEL to your system for more ammunitions. But the S-500 is indeed intended for a longer range and higher altitude than the THAAD and therefore require a bigger missile, on paper, more launchers per TEL is a good thing but it’s also important to not sacrifice strategic mobility, the configuration of 2 launcher per TEL seems to be a good trade-off for the russian doctrine which favour mobility for such systems.

[@28ebdh3udnav]

When will this available on Amazon?

[@joem0088]

These system are vulnerable to saturation attacks. In 2017 the US launched 59 Tomawk cruise missiles to hit Syrian Shayrat Airfield in syn, at various targets in the same airfield. The same tactic with all missiles aiming at any S400 or S500 main radar and control units arriving at different angles would have taken them out because inferior missiles have vast numerical superiority. Not to mention precision ground artillary attacks.

[@glebskakovsky9475]

Ofcourse every anti-air system in a world now is vulnerable to such type of attack. But when you compare Russia with Syria and doing far going conclusions i can reply that Patriot is absolutely uneffective due to well known cases when they even did not prevented attack and damage. But we both know that in these cases there were real people operating them poorly and standalone system never decides. Russia primarily developed S-500 for it's own defense which is deeply echeloned and S-500 will be accomplished by S-400 / S-350 / Buk / Thor e.t.c with long range radars like Voronezh, satellites, aviation radars like A-50/A-100 to detect and classify targets. Fleed, aviation and ground systems are now all integrated (like USA does) into complex commandment system which adequately protects key infrastructure objects. Ofcourse all that systems are vulnerable and there is count of weapons and military stuff which can be used to win an exact battle, but then nuclear weapons start being used and all tactics crumble into sand, because very much different nuclear ammo type can be used in different combinations neutraling almost every superiority achieved by saturation. It's like F-22 for example. If it will be used against Russia in it's territory highly likely it will be uneffective and destroyed, because of lack of it's main advantage : stealthness . As we change the territory to USA all changes to opposite outcome: F-22 becomes perfect defender in USA's sky, because it's supported by ground and sea anti-air systems, defended by other aviation so has very strong support. Now Russia does not export S-500 and inventing S-550 system, and imho S-500 will not be exported for at least decade. Every standalone system has drawbacks, while power comes with synergy.

[@joem0088]

@@glebskakovsky9475 Thank you for very informative reply :)

[@Sajuuk]

What most of these armchair Generals forget is that stealth is designed to BREAK THE KILL CHAIN, not make the aircraft invisible to radar (which is impossible). The kill chain is the sequence of events and steps necessary for a SAM system to detect, acquire, identify, track and reliably guide a missile to it's target. If ANY of the kill chain steps fail, the target escapes unharmed or undetected. The F22 and F35 are both designed to be very good at breaking the kill chain for current and future SAM systems, and the S-500's radar is no exception.

[@badcampa2641]

It will fill a defence hole or relieve multiple older systems i dont agree with the razmataz

[@malokegames]

And for countering that there is the SU-57 concept, with a complete different doctrine of operation than the F22/35s despite the usual comparisons by armchair Generals. The ideia is that the Su-57 is networked with the S-400/500 to protect an area from these western stealth fighter, making it not a stealth fighter but rather an anti-stealth figther. It's known that the long wave frequency radars can detect (not track) these figthers, but then this information is passed to the airbones Su-57s throught network and they can focus their radars energy on these specific areas instead of dispersing throught wide angles and this will allow to track these fighters within much greater range, enought to start engagement in the borders of the no escape zone of air-air missiles. It's a complex task, but these networking can allow the job to be done by integrated algoritms and AI, making the sukhoi pilot just a platform operator. That's where the real complexity of these S-400/500 systems are.

[@themax9913]

@@malokegames Well, actually, the Su-57 doctrine of usage is fundamentally the same as that of the F-22 (or at least as it was planned, while the F-35 or B-2 were intended to penetrate hostile airspace), both are meant to be operated in an IADS network and do interception jobs that normal air defense cant do efficiently. Your point with large wavelength and the extent of Russian IADS (of which S-400/S-500 are only components) is indeed true and that’s indeed a domain where the Su-57 could shine better than the F-22 since it is supported by a better furnished IADS network than that of the US (which lack the quantity in their homelands despite having a good quality).

[@Sajuuk]

@@malokegames Again, it all depends on the ability of the S-500 and the SU-57 to detect, track and guide missiles onto targets without becoming targets themselves. The SU-57 does not possess enough stealth to act in the manner which you have described without being detected. Furthermore, as soon as it uses it's radar to try resolve long-wave information passed to it by other radars it would be easily detectable, even by 4thGen fighters. This goes for SAM systems using their radars too. This is why breaking the chain is so important, and why the F22 and F35 excels at it. The S-500 might be a very good system but keep in mind the Americans intend on confidently using F35s until the year 2060. That should give you an idea of how effective it is.

[@malokegames]

@@Sajuuk As I said, focusing the Su-57 radar waves to the spot indicated by the long wave radars will make it able to track and guide missiles, it does not have the intention to be "stealth" but to hunt these stealth figthers. And as you said, as soon as the F-22/35 uses it's radar to engage the Su-57 (which they would rather avoid) it would be imediately detectable by the Su-57 or 4thGen fighters in support. I think you still did not understand the russian networking concept involving S-400 and Su-57s. Oh, and don't forget that confidentiality is the repice for failiure, that's just propaganda bs and not what really guides military decisions.

[@NATO_9870]

Make a video on the F18 Growler up against Russia’s air defences.

[@TheJoeSwanon]

@Drew Peacock I wonder if the electronic warfare suite on a B-52 is comparable to the growler?

[@mitrovdan]

Maybe covert "butt hurt" cable can make a video explaining to you how the Iranians took over america's top notch Sentinel drone in mid flight and landed it on their airbase. I know such news doesn't get the deserved attention cause it really showed how good the US army is but again, maybe CC can do a video on this matter, bett the Growler would make the Russians go crazy.... without a doubt

[@oneaboveall1751]

S-500: Surface-to-air missile S-1000: Surface-to-space missile S-2000: Surface-to-galaxy missile

[@Mike-rt1vh]

S-2000 ready for when Elon gets to mars

[@GegeDxD]

If we know the S400 system is the best in the world, we could only imagine for what capable is this beast.

[@djavoizkrsaful]

😂😂😂😂😂😂 Yes for sure! 😂😂😂😂😂😂 🤡

[@jonv.6213]

PFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF AHAHA

[@GegeDxD]

​​@@djavoizkrsafulYes, that is according to the experts between who Americans too and you can laugh all you want. How's Ukraine doing, by the way?

[@djavoizkrsaful]

Till now 300k ATACAS greetings!

[@flavioribeiro1039]

Um excelente equipamento bélico, o melhor do mundo da sua categoria!

[@Noname_NoID]

4:07 Emm... 77N6 is the anti-ballistic missile, 40N6 is anti-aerodynamic targets missile. There are two types of missiles on the S-500. 4:45 Frag warhead is a shit agaist ballistic targets because of Patriot is shit. It's a wrong logic. 9М96 has frag warhead and it have anti-ballistic capabilities, for example. Also 77N6 much more similar to 53T6 than 56T6.

[@aniksamiurrahman6365]

This is scary, yet impressive.

[@overlordgaming752]

So would the S-500 be integrated into existing S400 sites or would they be separately installed into their own specific sites?

[@sadheedhumar1359]

Probably separately for now. That's to increase the range covered by aa

[@Mr.T-SI]

S500 is the top end of the spectrum ,its not one do it all. S350 ,S400, S500 will work together not replace each other russian SAM typicaly also use multiple missile types for wide range of threats, same as BMD ,Thaad ,Patriot or Aegis Standard are complimentary, but here the presenter suggests that Aegis SM can't shoot down Aircraft because it can intercept missiles.

[@Monbar38]

No he suggests that at certain level if you want to for example be able to be very good at shooting down Medium or Intermediate range ballistic Missiles and also have capability to at least try and engage ICBM's in some part of their flight - you have to gear the system towards this rather than trying to also have it capable of shooting down airplanes etc. Which can be done using others systems. Aegis SM also uses different rockets to engage different targets. They share the same launcher and radar - which to some degree also has to reduce effectiveness on some spectrum of targets. It's unlikely that you will use Standard missiles to deal with quadcopters for example. You will want some rockets to be able to at least attempt to target and destroy Longer range Ballistic missiles (more than SRBM) in some phase of their flight. For quadcopters or even some planes you will use different system/rocket. Comparison to Aegis is a bit unfair, since the ship has limited amount of defenses available to it. S-500 will likely be deployed around Moscow, couple of very important targets and maybe - if the conflict draws for long enough it will be deployed to Syria. Doubtful that it will be used (just like S-400 was not), but it will serve as a training exercise to Russian soldiers to counter possible Ballistic threat from Israel (unofficially obviously). Really - Covert Cabal is saying what you're saying. He does say that it will be deployed among S-400, S-350 or S-300. But there seem to be a lot of comments that suggests that people didn't watch till the end of the video, because you say what he says and you say that he should have said the same thing. The only criticism I could levy is that he focused mostly on S-500. But it was response to all those nonsense videos on how fantastic/trashy it will be against F-22, F-35 and B-2. Which as you both say will not be the main target of the system.

[@masaharumorimoto4761]

S500 Day!!!! I dunno if I should be poppin bottles or diggin a shelter in my Canadian outback LOL.

[@omegaomega3]

why shelter? unless you live on a flying island you should be safe from the s500 lol

[@brexshit7168]

I bet it will be just as successful as the 300 and 400 hahahaha

[@domdolittle]

Interesting video, but it failed to summarize the true meaning of the S500, which is an additional system principally designed to work in tandem with earlier models the likes of S400, S300, and even other types of Russian defense systems, so when it is analyzed on its own it is bound to miss the full potential of such powerful designs, probably with the added bonus of keeping the West guessing what they are facing, or would be or not, in case of full spectrum conflict... Good luck with that !

[@keithadams812]

This system is great until it's turned on... But I wouldn't stand near it for too long