FIRST Details On Battlefield 2025 Revealed! ► Huge News Round-up

[@evilrooster9960]

We'll see. Remember boys, NO preordering. Wait till after launch to get it.

[@lfd10noob]

yep

[@chrisuuu393]

I will wait until open beta. If version that is supposed to encourage people to buy game (because thats what beta versions are these days) is gonna be at such a tragic level as 2042 beta, it means that main game will be equally bad.

[@Elu5iV3]

I learned my lesson with 2042. I wasted $110 on preordering it.

[@lfd10noob]

@@Elu5iV3 rip bro

[@lfd10noob]

@@chrisuuu393 will the open beta free? like the Delta Force alpha?

[@NAVYPROUD34]

No specialists is all I needed to hear to get excited

[@spesiell3902]

Remember they said specialists are classes when launching BF2042 DICE is cooked i wouldn't believe their shit until the game arrives

[@PROFESSOR_TV]

that's sad, no amount of beating will make you realize that you have to wait and see

[@someonelikejaden]

I want the next battlefield game to have soldier customization. Everything from head to toe, modernized armor, clothing, apparel, etc. This would be amazing. It’d be even better if we can swap out smaller pieces as well.

[@randomassname445]

No no... We need more than no specialists.

[@Whitect4v]

If you put specialists in bf3 or bf4 they would still be far beyond better than 2042.

[@-Luke--hn5uv]

The fact that they put such an emphasis on BF3 and BF4, and going back to how the games used to be gives me hope.

[@zready20]

Hope they get rid of that clunky running/walking animation, and give us that bf3,4 shooting mechanic.. this cod laser beaming no recoil guns ruins it

[@mikeyplayzwrld]

Guns have little recoil in real life

[@chrisa8863]

​@mikeyplayzwrld guns are also not lasers. Bf4 and Bf3 gunplay mechanics were very skilled based with having to pace your shots to be accurate. Unloading 10-15 rounds at a time without burst firing is absurd for Battlefield gunplay.

[@el1e869]

@@mikeyplayzwrld*some

[@PolishHussarian]

i just want a damn amazing battlefield that is military focused and not focused on trends with hero specialists.

[@benferon6214]

Saw this info on TikTok but you know I was waiting for the ghost gaming confirmation

[@NAVYPROUD34]

That was probably me haha

[@Jonesyful10]

There were a lot of promising things that Vince mentioned here, just have to hope everything works out and they dont let us down again.

[@KingXyroVI]

They'll let us down they always do

[@codyhemphill2368]

With your amount of hope and trust, they just might! Give them a final chance for this next game.​@@KingXyroVI

[@TheAlmightyPrime]

I’m hyped but cautious

[@CalebRemastered]

As we All Should Be..

[@Whitect4v]

How he doesn’t take this opportunity to talk about rent a server, community managed private servers, is concerning

[@dova238]

He’s not going to spill out everything with all the details for the first interview of this game

[@Thanos-sc8lk]

New battlefield should be battlefield 1 in moderen setting with bf4 customization

[@Splarkszter]

DICE NO LONGER HAS THE ORIGINAL TALENT THAT MADE THE BATTLEFIELDS WE LOVED. IT'S A SHELL. AN EMPTY MEANINGLESS NAME. STOP.

[@Jamesonfp]

give this new team one last chance. If they completely squash it, then trash them like crazy lmao

[@albertosgr9]

@@Jamesonfpdidn’t they bring back some of the old devs ? Or these rumors were false ?

[@Splarkszter]

@@Jamesonfp Sure. Let the BILLION dollar company have a "last" chance.

[@Splarkszter]

@@albertosgr9 Anyone smart won't get back on to EA, even less when they left on their own. Corpos like EA just contract randoms for 6 months periods to avoid paying bonuses.

[@venom_snake1984]

Specialists not combing back is the best thing ever. I hated the concept and implementation of it so much in 2042.

[@lfd10noob]

we are so back!

[@MrSilk13642]

Specialists were simply just classes with different names.

[@Patrioto-gy8zu]

@@MrSilk13642 agreed

[@runforestrunfpv4354]

Specialist pick up?

[@chrisa8863]

​@runforestrunfpv4354 that would probably be fine. We had power weapon pickups around the map on BF4

[@justgold4113]

Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah.... Heard it all before. Until we actually see a real Battlefield game, I will remain sceptical and not believe a word of it all. Do I think Zampella is the right guy to deliver an actual Battlefield experience? Yes, but don't get hyped, remain grounded and NO PREORDERS!!!!!!!!!!!

[@jdslater1]

I just want streets and buildings back. had enough of fields with stupid amounts of shipping crates and boxes. and just normal weapons (no lasers) and calm down on flying stuff that makes no sense.

[@OPTIMUMELITE]

No pre-ordering No hype Im going to see what they do. But i cant get hyped just to be disappointed again. Going to wait until we get a full reveal and a full and actual gameplay.

[@ponraul1221]

As good as no specialists is, remember that is the most basic of things that should be in a Battlefield game. The standards of BFBC2, BF3, BF4, BF1 remain; the new game needs to be better than what we've seen in a loooonngg time.

[@rosaria8384]

Yeah. And then the semi-omnimovement that BFV did would have been great as it felt innovative for its time.

[@Dorian_Kellum]

I’ll comment this on every video if I need to: Please just make a good Battlefield game. Don’t chase trends, don’t reinvent the wheel. Classic Battlefield will bring folks back. Bring that BF3 tone with a bit of 2 and 4 thrown in. If you nail it, they will come. A solid Battlefield will dominate this age of multiplayer games. Edit: Oh, and fuck off EA

[@abenormal3070]

like that edit part

[@dremathis5830]

Battlefield 3 and 4 with the graphics of 1 would be great, also dont be like COD. Thats what seriously ruined everything for us fans. We play this franchise for a REASON. If we want to play Call of Duty, we will play Call of Duty. They gained so much love to their franchise by literally taking major aspects with invasion and ground war of Battlefield and yet still couldnt do it right. ONLY battlefield can do BATTLEFIELD

[@diarmuidolaoghaire3922]

Great to hear we are getting a classic BF back based on BF3 & BF4. Maybe there is light at the end of the tunnel after all. Looking forward to the play test. Hope its as polished as Delta Force was.

[@one_eyed_odin]

No specialists No 128 player maps CTE coming back for community feedback So far so good, but I'm still skeptical until I see the goods.

[@jangotherango7250]

128 is not that bad but if they decrease it should be 84.

[@ponraul1221]

@@jangotherango7250 There's no need to increase above 64. Higher player counts means more empty objectives, half full servers, less server options, less squad impact, and inevitably worse map design on average.

[@rosaria8384]

​@@jangotherango7250 72 would be a good middle ground tbh.

[@one_eyed_odin]

64 works stop trying to reinvent the wheel it's suggestions like these that has Battlefield in the state it's in currently.

[@jei3970]

I at least want a option for then 64 players.

[@chrisa8863]

They gotta stop worrying about "outselling" or "competing" with other IP's. Make the game that the fans asked for and the money will follow ffs.

[@rodrigomeldola6538]

I hope they keep the solo vs bots mod and battlefield portal, is so fun to play solo against bots. This reminds me from the old gold days from battlefield 2 offline mode.

[@CNM3]

I agree and I hope they crank it up a few notches by making the AI more formidable like having faster reaction times and using more of the weaponry and gadgets on the map.

[@daymaster1]

I mean I definitely think we need to give props to attempted innovation for 2042. The last thing I want is for Battlefield to be another Call of Duty, just getting stuck in a rut. It's good to shake things up and test the waters. Not everything stuck, but there were some great innovations in 2042! Vehicle call ins, and the plus system are amazing! Portal is great, it should be free to play, but not everything is perfect. I personally applaud DICE for trying to do something new, and falling on their faces, rather than make a generic Battlefield.

[@DeadSpacedOut]

Vehicle Call-Ins are cool, but not great. They cause map design to break if you can just call a Tank in on a rooftop. Plus system was cool too, but the majority of people only used it to mag swap for more ammo. Portal was good though. Not a 2042 hater btw, i'm just saying, none of the innovations really worked super well.

[@thepigglywiggly1625]

I'm probably in the minority, but I HATED the plus system. There were no longer checks and balances to the load out you select when every gun can have short, medium, and long range attachments put on in 2 seconds (within reason, snipers are still snipers, subs machine guns are still sub machine guns etc)

[@dova238]

I prefer the SQ leader call-outs from bf5, it’s shows a sense of bigger responsibility and role for the SQ leader. In 2042 it’s all senseless and u don’t have earn points to access it. And also those callout take up spots from the main spawner from the view of the map.

[@dova238]

@@thepigglywiggly1625I fell u bro u right u can turn an at to an smg and a semi auto

[@UltraSur76]

I agree with wanting to innovate, because as you mentioned the copy paste COD cycle not for me...but the absolute poor state of how 2042 launched that's unacceptable...I've played early access games from indie devs that were in a much better state. Hope they use the community with true alpha & beta play tests, for instance I played in the Delta Force closed Alpha and that seemed damn near finished (with no bugs I recall during playing).

[@roguer6v270]

Community testing is always a great idea...but I'm not sure for a 2025 release probably early 2026.

[@amvhate]

Not having a modern setting wasn't the problem. It was everything else. Need to see how the game is going monetization to see if this game worth playing

[@cyborgofdeath]

so much for continuing the 2042 story verse lol

[@fourpressmedia2674]

Good stuff. Thanks for keeping us up to date.

[@larsjohansen821]

They have said those things before. Just because it's a different person with a past from somewhere else doesn't mean it will happen. We will only know when the game is out

[@jonronnquist]

My entirely subjective view is that BF2 was the heyday. I was young, obsessed and in a diehard clan. 😂

[@edubblesspirit]

I dunno. I haven’t liked vehicles (particularly air vehicles) since BF4 and maybe Hardline. And the destruction or map integrity peaked from BC2 - 4. I don’t think the current studios have the ability to replicate that same feeling and style.

[@vfxswagg1337]

4 was still pretty solid for vehicle control.

[@highlander6573]

Flying jets sucks in 2042, there's not even speed control

[@edubblesspirit]

@@vfxswagg1337 for sure! I think 4 and hardline were the last games with great vehicles. 1 had good tanks but they were kinda easy and got stale for me.

[@Legendary_Levite]

I really don’t want these “natural disasters” in this game. I want to be able to take down a skyscraper!!!

[@terryjones3755]

Sounds promising but we've been promised so much before. at this point I'm past caring about battlefield and will probably use a free trial after release but I don't have much faith In any hype prior to release.

[@jackoff-18]

I would only get hayped after the beta

[@marchinogrimo3446]

2042 beta was better than final release ill get exited after first 100gb day one patch and 30 hours gameplay on youtube by ghost and other content creators

[@jackoff-18]

@@marchinogrimo3446 lmao did we play the same beta ? All that I can remember is it was extremely buggy and didn't run well and I give up after 30 min

[@ALBOHOS]

Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.

[@Brando_000]

BF3 and 4. With a touch of BF1. The artwork at the beginning looked promising. Hopefully we get classic battlefield back

[@ywsx6489]

i liked the 128 player large scale chaos. just gotta make proper maps for it.

[@akiraphantom5]

I'm cautiously optimistic about the next Battlefield game. Having no specialists is a good start but still I'm not preordering it.

[@KingXyroVI]

It's EA so it'll be ass

[@codyhemphill2368]

This sounds really good, now we just have to wait and trust them on their part!

[@streamallday]

they're just telling us what we want to hear

[@BourbonBandit-]

So far so good. Still not pre ordering or buying until it’s actually out. I hope others do the same.

[@OMGitsSparky]

At least they are getting the essentials right. Looking forward to what's to come.

[@SmiteMeAlmightySmiter]

Can we get a well written co-op campaign? After Space Marine 2 pulled it off, I need more.

[@cybersamovar]

in Zampella we trust

[@i-Melika]

Idc till i see pure gameplay

[@Charliecraig2003]

I personally am going to wait for reviews after launch and the overall community before deciding if i should get it myself but here’s to hoping this series can make a true comeback with the next title especially after the failure of bf5 and negative response to 2042 to say the least. Also the next game could be launching in between or after the launch of two of biggest games next year the long awaited GTA 6 the most anticipated game ever and the currently heavily rumoured 2025 cod that is supposed be a direct sequel to black ops 2 set in the early 2030’s.

[@CWood91]

They can do a battlefield 3/4 remake with update graphics and 120 frames. Golden

[@avhound2]

Hey!!! Finally, BF2 gets recognition from you. ❤

[@MurasakiShizu]

remember guys no pre order

[@Lance_Borislov]

Oh god, the easiest thing they could have done was something like this, so don't get excited. Tbh we should all shut the fuck up and wait for failures. Realism. They have fucked us for years my fellow BF knights. Don't get too hopeful.

[@Lance_Borislov]

Feels like a cheater saying they won't cheat

[@ponraul1221]

Exactly they've spat in our face twice in a row now. People should just wait and see and not get hyped.

[@STUDD_MUFFIN]

that image looks like it could be Trevi, an Italian Hill Town Near Rome Umbria

[@therealmrsteve]

Vince made the Titanfall series and the first cod games. I trust him

[@KOT-ANGRY]

Please, BF4 remake and we all will be happy! Point getting via heli fly - taking flags (kills are not allowed), was one of the best experiences!!! Original Metro map (was BEST), all new ones with elevators were TRASH! Shanghai - mmmm ❤️

[@internetuser736]

Ngl kinda interested in this one. Unfortunately got into this franchise at a bad time with 2042 being my first BF. Hopefully it’ll be like the old ones everyone enjoys

[@Dedzigs]

The details of the next Battlefield are getting me very excited!

[@bpaffasbp]

ALL WE WANT IS A REMASTER OF BF3

[@Enthu5iast]

Hype train! Choo-choo-choo! Hop in guys!

[@SamuelHale-fk9ij]

It sounds like they are going to have two versions to me within the same game. Classic mode like BF3/BF4 or Specialists.

[@tinotaylor]

Battlefield on switch 2 would be wild

[@ryanhammond8292]

Of all the battlefield games that I've played 2042 was my favorite, that being said I want to see another like it maybe in the further future

[@ricardomagana6755]

Imagine that concept art is a big 128 player base Battle Royal Battlefield map where the wild fire closes in on survivors... I hope they take their BF Franchise in the realistic route. They can be in the unique category videogame of being a realistic shooter. Battlefield will not beat call of duty at being an arcadey, no recoil, slide cancelling shooter😂 Battlefield needs to stand out as a realistic military shooter. Being realistic adds difficulty and difficult is what is rewarding in a game. Give us a realistic shooter experience that will make COD jealous of not being a realistic shooter. I mean come on, who slide cancels in real life? Pubg is a good example of being tactical and realistic with the mechanics. It may not be COD, but it provides its own difficult yet fun survival experience. Overall, I think Battlefield has a formula to be in the category of a realistic military shooter experience & not follow a path of overwatch with heroes or sweat of duty cartoony shooters... Real recoil can go a long way in shooters, not gonna lie😂 it adds difficulty & makes us want to get better at the game, but that's what makes it challenging and rewarding when landing difficult shots... First AAAA shooter experience??

[@kennyobrienaiti]

BF4 with as many maps, even more desturction and the build mechanics in BF5, but even more

[@jrh8041]

Probably sounds corny but, when i read/when you said the report about “battlefield going back to basics” i got shivers lol. As a die hard bf4 fan if they just remastered bf3 or 4 id be in tears. I loved bf1.. and bf5s movement was good and different. Look at gunfights in bf4.. they just look and feel real as dark as that may sound to be a positive lol. The little poofs of clothing/blood when you hit at enemy (no hitmarker vibration on console also made it more immersive tbh) to the way the enemies ragdoll is even more realistic than the latest entry i found. Fuck even the voice acting. So many different shreiks and screams in bf4 i almost feel guilty sometimes killing enemies lmao Its almost like sometimes ppl think ‘realistic’ means boring. Its rly about the devs knowing how to capture the realism and make it impactful. Doesnt have to be full force levoltuon, just where it makes sense. I wish a group of og battlefield players could just be accommodated to stay with the devs and continuously keep testing it along to the way or something😂 Im rambling. Anyways just bring back the normal battlefield assault medic support sniper and make the movement and maps beautiful and boom.. you have yourself a hit. Easy? It seems like it should be lets just hope they deliver this time.

[@thatplasticbag6953]

we're so back

[@samuelleek8818]

I wish the next game has that nitty gritty feeling with a good solid setting. 2042 didn’t feel as perilous as 3 or 4 felt. One other thing is I kinda miss premium in a way. Hot take as you were paying twice for the game but at least content was steady. Every few months 3 weapons and 3 maps guaranteed. But I also understand that paying AAA prices twice over isn’t consumer friendly which I agree with on that side of things.

[@desy2478]

I’m one of those ‘core’ players who has played since BF2. I would welcome a return to modern era bf3/bf4 remake. I didn’t buy 2042 til it was cheap and actually enjoyed the specialists. It would be better to have traditional classes but give them an extra realistic gadget/ability to choose from. Not wing suits or daft grappling hooks. Bf3 classes dialogue gave them a lot of character without being specialists.

[@TheNapoleonComplex1]

Battlefield 2142 doesn't get enough respect. Titan mode was tons of fun.

[@SamuelHale-fk9ij]

I want to see a FINISHED game this time please EA.

[@disaster4you2]

bigger squads and a strong commander plz

[@stuntboy1717]

I wanted the battlefield game to be set in the Korean War that War hasn't gotten a chance yet

[@ScooterScudieri]

Killer destruction PLEASE!!!!!!!!! 😅❤😊

[@vfxswagg1337]

Can we also get rid of the Call of Duty style movement?

[@Jaap-Relou]

Im not totally agreeing on the specialists statement here. I don’t want them personally but they could have worked if the did them differently. Now it was just half baked, to hyped, to ‘stereotypical’, to goofy, and most importantly not faction specific. This was the biggest dealbreaker for me. Not having factions, well they had in the BF2042 lore but through that out of the window with the game, is just strange.

[@lb2235]

Probably sounds corny but, when i read the report about “battlefield going back to basics” i got shivers lol. As a die hard bf4 fan if they just remastered bf3 or 4 id be in tears. I loved bf1.. and bf5s movement was good and different. i do still prefer a slower movement like b1. Look at gunfights in bf4.. they just look and feel real as dark as that may sound to be a positive lol. The little poofs of clothing/blood when you hit at enemy (no hitmarker vibration on console also made it more immersive tbh) to the way the enemies ragdoll is even more realistic than the latest entry i found. Fuck even the voice acting. So many different shreiks and screams in bf4 i almost feel guilty sometimes killing enemies lmao Its almost like sometimes ppl think ‘realistic’ means boring. Its rly about the devs knowing how to capture the realism and make it impactful. Doesnt have to be full force levoltuon, just where it makes sense. side note. the hitmarker animations are cheesy/immature. when you hit someone i dont want to see a bunch of imaginary lasers shoot out of the hitbox area to let me know i hit/killed them?... takes me right out of the realism and just feels so "video gamey" i dont know..i think they need to tone that way down. Im rambling. Anyways just bring back the normal battlefield assault medic support sniper and make the movement and maps beautiful and boom.. you have yourself a hit. Easy? It seems like it should be lets just hope they deliver this time.

[@GraysonUhlman-ju8dg]

Never pre order

[@kamtrey9552]

They better add a extraction mode

[@favclassisspy9478]

I hope they don't do a complete 180 with the map sizes and they keep some large maps.

[@aiden8834]

7:34 In my opinion I personally feel like Battlefield is COD’s ONLY true competitor

[@Skrutt1984]

Important things to get right!: No futuristic shit gadgets. Grapling hooks, wall hacks, shields etc. Locked classes. A sniper is a sniper, a medic is a medic... Medium sized maps with veriaty and cover. SERVER BROWSER! Squad gameplay with meaningful squad leader tasks. Call ins like in BFV. Not like in 2042. Movement as in BFV. No plus system. Maps as in BF4. Destruction as in BFBC3 but even better. Big DLC with a couple of maps, viechles, weapons etc every season. Gritty setting with realism like in BF1. 64 players. No Portal. It was a good idea but it dont work. Its just full of shit settings to play. Let us start our own servers but with less options. Real single player story, no "war storys". I rather have them to focus on this only and no BR or other shit that takes resourses and time. Do this and its a banger.

[@jockelange73]

Bring back BF2 with the optional expansion packs like Armoured Fury and Special Operations or remake the BF BC series

[@sketchiestscribbles3130]

I have seen a couple people say that the *concept art* is AI. imo I don't think it is lighting seems to line up, and the helicopters and ships look to be models maybe? idk

[@highlander6573]

Cautiously hyped

[@globalmalfunction]

Battlebit did 256 players and it worked fantastically

[@chrisa8863]

We'll see if its Battlefield in NAME only. If i'm a betting man, my money would be on yes.

[@APrawks]

The title is just Battlefield. Are they using Portal within the game? Multiple studios working on this. Is each studio working on remastering a certain edition alongside a new version? He does mention several titles. Just off the top of my head.

[@jaetwotimez]

Give me back firestorm!

[@jei3970]

I at least want a mode with more than 32v32. Maybe 50v50?

[@stewills9711]

Cross platform, with NO aim assist. Keep the realism and differenciate from the CoD style. Don't try to make the combat too fast, get more of a strategic approach to gamemodes, no silly DLC with 'Snoop Dogg' or 'The Boys' and youre on to a winner. One thing I would love to see, more than a 'Battle Royale' is a DMZ type game mode with the option to turn PVP off and play PVE only, kinda like Campaign with Co-Op+ if you know what I mean.

[@purplepanda8805]

No specialists... alright you have my attention.

[@chasethechosenone8478]

I’m excited! I’ve been wanting and waiting for a new battlefield. I’m done with apex legends atm. That’s the only game I can really play right now until the new battlefield drops.

[@jjjuio]

They need to add the insurgency sandstorm team

[@GrandpasGaming]

Good news any bf is a good thing for me

[@alexarcher97]

Suprised bad company isn’t mentioned in their best period that was part of that top line up. Also how many times do they need to learn how to fix a game…bf4 wasn’t immune to this nor was any other game since

[@Hannoyaiba]

I pray for a nighttime tokyo map

[@skimaskman]

Unlike activision, they only cocked up releasing 2042 (& bf5 if u aren't me) so this is their second chance to not fuck things up, let's see how it goes

[@Justin_Time_420]

Please Zampella,....Can you please let the jets and choppers take off from the ground ....Please sir ,..the race for the vehicles is a game in it self :) Bee a player since bf veitnam :)

[@abenormal3070]

vietnam is my favorite in series for it's asymmetric gameplay and epic soundtrack

[@PrasathMGM]

5.53 flying guy

[@SanityEclipse532]

I think 128 wasn't a mistake, it's just that maps are garbage. Some of the maps play really well with 128. Battlefield doesn't need to be balanced and well-paced all the time, sometimes it needs crazy flex slaughterhouse that you will not find anywhere else

[@maxtugger1859]

Can’t say I’m confident they will make a good game.

[@JJones-cl4dm]

I'm not excited because I know they'll blow it.

[@lI_Simo_Hayha_Il]

I am ok with 64p maps, as long as they are open and not meat-grinders... It is ok to have a Metro, but not 9 out of 10 like it...