As far as looks go; the Himalayan easily takes the cake imo. It just looks rough and experienced and freaking cool. Not saying the CF looks bad but it definitely doesn’t appeal to me as much.
@martyn_g3 ай бұрын
The CF is a good looking bike, but it’s a little cookie cutter. They’ve followed a trend rather then create their own look. The RE, looks like a RE, so it stands out
@meoropai2676 ай бұрын
First of all sorry for my broken English. What is your goal? To find for a daily commute? Or an overland ride? Or maybe a daily commute + off-roading weekend? And my opinion, RE Himalayan 450 is the best except the offroad experience. I’ve rode it, for me the power a bit more than expected, manage to put a big smile on my face along my 304km journey, the suspension setup something that we need to address, bring above-average level of comfort yet you still can bring it to the winding road, attacking the corners, and this bike will bring another smile, maybe on your eyes, because you mouth already smile earlier when you got on this bike earlier. P/s : i’ve never rode CF 450MT, and i will never try to do so because of my love towards Himalayan 450 😂😂😂
@markpearson20857 ай бұрын
Looked at both, went for the cf moto after helping a friend pick her Himalayan up of the ground. I know there the same weight but it was heavy even just getting off the side stand.
@martyn_g3 ай бұрын
Off the side stand, turn the bars. With the correct lifting technique you can get a loaded T7 off the ground. Turn the bars, squat, and lift from the bar end closest to the ground. It’s leverage.
@The6rezax5 ай бұрын
Team Himalayan 450 👇
@TwistofWrist7 ай бұрын
I reckon you will pick the 450MT cause you've already had RE before. Plus, twin is better on highways anyway.
@MademotoADV7 ай бұрын
Vaild point! Although the new Himalayan 450 looks very good
@TwistofWrist7 ай бұрын
@Mademototrip If looks is what determine your decision to purchase a motorcycle then nobody would buy an MT-10. Plus we are Asians. We mostly care about cheap, good, fast; not aesthetic. HAIYA! 🤣
@meoropai2676 ай бұрын
RE was better on highway
@TwistofWrist6 ай бұрын
@meoropai267 a single is better than twin on highway? No way.
@meoropai2676 ай бұрын
@@TwistofWrist you can cruise up to 150km/h++ without reaching redline with Himalayan 450.
@tatasth85597 ай бұрын
Honestly it’s apples vs oranges meaning single vs twin cylinder and imo single always win for 1 reason that is mileage.
@MademotoADV7 ай бұрын
What do you mean with Mileage?
@jordanpangilinan5097 ай бұрын
Fuel efficiency of the single cylinder near square engine 30kmpl vs twin cylinder 22kmpl
@tatasth85597 ай бұрын
@@MademotoADV by mileage i mean not only the range the engine give you maybe its just me but i find it weird that a 450 twin cylinder which is also liquid cooled is giving you 22kmpl meanwhile you have RE's 650 twin cylinder which is air & oil cooled also giving you 22kmpl.
@AlexisGarcia-zj8qp7 ай бұрын
120kmph on himalayan 6000 RPM,mt 7000 RPM
@VascoDaGama14986 ай бұрын
@@AlexisGarcia-zj8qp Hi mate! I am a newbie in motorcycling, why is high speed low rpm better?
@twowheelin73617 ай бұрын
450MT sounds heaps better. Switch gear on Himalayan feels cheap. It’s a tough decision🤔Himalayan has a 21” front and 17” rear.
@MademotoADV7 ай бұрын
Sound definitly plays a big part.
@myrtlekenazjanairo94117 ай бұрын
I's go for that CFMoto 450MT. Better quality, better sound.
@slakk50936 ай бұрын
To be fair, we don’t know this yet. CFMoto have a history of electrical gremlins and 450 engine blowing head gaskets, RE have problems with frames and pulling to right
@macp9885 ай бұрын
Everyone praising cf 450. Faster, better off road and motorways, better looks, engine sound. Sure it has some crappy chinese plastic but who cares😅
@martyn_g3 ай бұрын
Everyone also praises the RE, so buyers should ride both.
@paukaya3606 ай бұрын
Go for cf moto. Royal Enfield have issues with chassis broken