First Time Watching 5 Reasons You Shouldn't Mess With The USA

  Рет қаралды 148,822

Yass & Fats

Yass & Fats

4 ай бұрын

#YassandFats #BritsReact #usa
Please like, subscribe and turn on notifications if you enjoyed the video!👊🏻
Support Our Channel Here:
cash.app/yassandfats
PayPal.me/yassandfats
/ yassandfats
Stay Connected With Us Here:
Yass Instagram: / yass_gifted
Fats Instagram: / miss.cdy
Yass & Fats Instagram: / yassandfats
BIG SHOUT OUT TO OUR Y&F LEGENDS MEMBERS:
Mohammed Soliman,

Пікірлер: 1 000
@yassandfats
@yassandfats 2 ай бұрын
Support our channel here: patreon.com/YassandFats 🔥👊🏻
@arthurelliott-ds3eo
@arthurelliott-ds3eo 2 ай бұрын
Do you still think Russia is stronger than America😊
@karenthompson8038
@karenthompson8038 Ай бұрын
I was thinking about when you were looking at that tank that jump scared itself when it fired and I was watching somebody who was talking about “yeah cuz in America are made well..Unlike Russian tanks if you cough too hard it will explode and Russians are leaving their tanks because it’s safer to fight with twigs.”
@heartnsoul9093
@heartnsoul9093 29 күн бұрын
Hey you two! Love your videos! I just wanted to mention one great thing about AI/robots. American police forces and military forces are now using robots to diffuse bombs. That would be a great vid to watch, wouldn't it? Love you both
@je6453
@je6453 22 күн бұрын
You guys stop the videos to freaking much.
@cory5584
@cory5584 11 күн бұрын
Who you think helped Israel develop the iron dome
@sneakyninja3026
@sneakyninja3026 4 ай бұрын
Who's gunna tell them we already have lazers lol
@preppydevildogable
@preppydevildogable 4 ай бұрын
My brother was helping to install directed energy weapon prototypes for the government as a contractor working for Boeing back around 2008. That was 16 years ago. I shutter to think of what we have now.
@thereallyst
@thereallyst 4 ай бұрын
...or Railguns..😂😂
@kevinjolly4584
@kevinjolly4584 4 ай бұрын
Nah, watching Utube is currently russias way of doing research so let’s not spoil everything!
@squidwarddiesel8462
@squidwarddiesel8462 4 ай бұрын
Yep
@Weeks25
@Weeks25 4 ай бұрын
😂
@patrickmosier3674
@patrickmosier3674 4 ай бұрын
the fact we're allowed to see this stuff now means there is secretly better stuff allready
@vagabondwastrel2361
@vagabondwastrel2361 4 ай бұрын
That isn't how the American military rolls. They underplay the statistics when everyone else bluffs about theirs. We will pretend to not see enemy targets ages before we show we can see them.
@amys4392
@amys4392 Ай бұрын
Facts.
@jamesedington9126
@jamesedington9126 Ай бұрын
​@amys4392 absolute fact.
@00Anjie
@00Anjie Ай бұрын
yeah, I heard the public is usually at least a decade behind military tech. So if we know about it, it's because it's old tech now.
@philmaynard7691
@philmaynard7691 10 күн бұрын
Facta
@troyp5359
@troyp5359 4 ай бұрын
Honorable mention to this list is the civilian population, we are the most armed in the world!
@JB-xh5mc
@JB-xh5mc 4 ай бұрын
Y'all can thank Texas for that. Lol
@Weeks25
@Weeks25 4 ай бұрын
120 guns per 100 people… the nest closest country I believe is 38 guns per 100 people.
@troyp5359
@troyp5359 4 ай бұрын
@@JB-xh5mc naw they def help, but I'm on the other side of the country and I don't know anybody that doesn't own multiple guns
@bobbombar6711
@bobbombar6711 4 ай бұрын
Yhe Swiss might be a close second.
@awelch31
@awelch31 4 ай бұрын
True, but not sure that’s such a positive thing there. No military has a chance to even make it to our shores. Personal guns don’t really serve a purpose given an invasion attempt
@tdawg5742
@tdawg5742 4 ай бұрын
Fun fact: 10 US stealth bomber F-117 hovered above Baghdad in 1991 for over an hour waiting for the air campaign to begin. Iraq was the most heavily fortified city in the world and had the highest density of Anti-Air platforms and the Iraqis still didn't know the Americans were hovering above them until the F-117 dropped their bombs on them.
@justicar2747
@justicar2747 4 ай бұрын
Fun fact: The F-117 isn't a bomber, and it cannot hover. The F-117 is an Attack/Strike aircraft, and I believe the word you're looking for is loiter. Additionally the Nighthawk hasn't been in service for some years now.
@tdawg5742
@tdawg5742 4 ай бұрын
@@justicar2747 Correct. Loiter. Cycled
@oDv.
@oDv. 4 ай бұрын
tdawg also, they lied in global media constantly. Well, Obama lied too about having secret missions in foreign nations.
@mrbrianandrewsmith
@mrbrianandrewsmith 4 ай бұрын
None of these are fun facts. I'm a downer, but I hate the fact that we need these in the first place. But we do need them.
@Anubis78250
@Anubis78250 3 ай бұрын
@@justicar2747 They were officially retired in 2008, but some are actually still in service. In fact plans are for them to continue until 2034. Of 59 total built in 2019 the Air Force still had 51, with 12 designated to go to museums. As of 2023 they still had 45, with a new 10 year support services contract. Each year they get rid of a few, but they continue to be used in research and training missions. Saying it's not a 'bomber' is a technicality really. Most people do not make a distinction between bombers and strike aircraft, and the payload of the F-117 in particular is limited to the sort of ordinance that most closely matches the definition of bombs.
@randieandjodistrom854
@randieandjodistrom854 4 ай бұрын
I served in the United States Air Force for 30 years, and the first half of my career was associated with nuclear weapons, including serving as a missile combat crew member for the Minuteman III Inter-continental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) system and as a crewmember aboard the Strategic Air Command Airborne Command Post. In short, there are few who understand nuclear combat better than I. I also consider myself to be a true American. What I mean by that is that it has never been the intent or desire of the United States of America to conquer or dominate any other country. The United States was founded on the principle of demonstrating the power of a free people to be governed as they choose and global free trade. The proof of that statement is the United States could, if it were our intent, to absolutely dominate the world militarily...there's not a remote second--the US spends more on defense every year than the next 10 nations combined. The US's primary interest is to maintain a stable world environment to encourage worldwide trade and commerce as this is in the best interest of all nations, including the United States. I've studied military history, capabilities and strategies for almost 50 years, and I'm a part of that history. The United States has the capability to make any other nation on earth "go away," but has no interest in doing so as is serves no meaningful purpose. I consider myself a military professional, and the goal of a military professional is not to "kill people and break their toys," the purpose of a military professional is to pinpoint and eliminate the source of violence against one's nation and people and restore peace as soon as possible with the absolute minimum of collateral damage.
@headyxfilms1523
@headyxfilms1523 4 ай бұрын
wish you did more explaining then (sorry but not sorry) pat your own back
@bwana-ma-coo-bah425
@bwana-ma-coo-bah425 4 ай бұрын
the US is only as strong as the nations that help it. what war did the US go to alone? Vietnam? Korea? Iraq? Afghanistan?
@bwana-ma-coo-bah425
@bwana-ma-coo-bah425 4 ай бұрын
@@headyxfilms1523 hahahah👍
@deborahdanhauer8525
@deborahdanhauer8525 4 ай бұрын
Thank you for your service❤️🤗🐝
@bwana-ma-coo-bah425
@bwana-ma-coo-bah425 4 ай бұрын
@@deborahdanhauer8525 can I ask you why you thank him for his service? was the US under attack?
@bluflaam777
@bluflaam777 4 ай бұрын
Ruzzia and China has navies that count canoes as part of their naval force. The US is a force to be reconned with.
@Weeks25
@Weeks25 4 ай бұрын
😂 Chinas navy can’t go further the. 1,000 miles from their shore! They aren’t a blue water navy an yes they count every little ship that would be no match for our smallest destroyer.
@jamessasson5982
@jamessasson5982 4 ай бұрын
Says HLC
@oDv.
@oDv. 4 ай бұрын
There are many capable militaries in the planet dude.
@mindyrolston3915
@mindyrolston3915 4 ай бұрын
​@@Weeks25agree. I mean it's ridiculous when you're making an aircraft carriers and you use conventional fuel.😂
@JNJ1983
@JNJ1983 4 ай бұрын
I don't know about Russia, but China includes their Coast Guard ships, boats, gear, and soldiers as part of their Navy, but the U.S. does not. The U.S. Coast Guard and Marines are under the Navy umbrella, but their "kit," as you Brits say, and soldiers, are separate, and their own entity.
@robertlowther6979
@robertlowther6979 4 ай бұрын
What you got to remember about Israel's missile defense system(Shield), it came from the United States, so obviously we know how to get around it
@godiswatching9501
@godiswatching9501 2 ай бұрын
Nuclear bombs burn at the temperature of the sun, if it’s a direct hit, Israel’s “shield” would evaporate, nothing can withstand the heat of the sun, well, not yet atleast
@AalsFireplace
@AalsFireplace 2 ай бұрын
And if a nuke was shot down it would just spread the radio active material further
@Coolrockndad
@Coolrockndad 4 ай бұрын
It's called "Peace through Strength".
@Hmmmmmmmm320
@Hmmmmmmmm320 4 ай бұрын
Fun fact: The Minutemen were American militia men stationed to warn of British attacks during the revolutionary war. They were tasked with being ready on a minutes notice. That’s where the name for our ICBM nuclear weapons come from.
@Sophie-ge7ti
@Sophie-ge7ti 4 ай бұрын
...technically they were British militia warning against British regulars (redcoats).
@oDv.
@oDv. 4 ай бұрын
The British are cummin' !!!!
@mostlyshorts7462
@mostlyshorts7462 4 ай бұрын
And thank god we won 🇺🇸
@PAT8888-is2pd
@PAT8888-is2pd 3 ай бұрын
Technically, the militia involved consisted of any and all that were able to pick up a gun, fire it and reload. Regardless of age or background.
@hunterace9235
@hunterace9235 Ай бұрын
You both have made me very proud to be an American Veteran and Voter! 🫡
@28dirtj
@28dirtj 4 ай бұрын
Aircraft carriers have around 5000 personnel on them. It's literally a U.S. base floating on water. They can see everything on radar for up to 200 miles away. For reference, point blank range in the ocean or sea is like 15 miles. So 200 miles isn't that crazy but no other military yields the radar capability we have. We have the 3 most advanced radar systems in the world and our Aircraft carriers use all 3 in coordination with eachother.
@lenzielenski3276
@lenzielenski3276 4 ай бұрын
5 square acres of sovereign American territory...anywhere we care to put it.
@hookem78748
@hookem78748 4 ай бұрын
Largest air forces in the world: 1) US Airforce 2) US Navy 3) Russia 4) US Army 5) US Marines 6) India 7) West China
@averagemobileplayergfs7383
@averagemobileplayergfs7383 4 ай бұрын
I honestly don’t know about #3 spot with Russia…Especially, after their true “capabilities” shown in the Ukraine conflict.
@SylviusTheMad
@SylviusTheMad 4 ай бұрын
@@averagemobileplayergfs7383 They've been reluctant to expose their aircraft to risk, but even so appear to have lost over 300 planes and over 300 helicopters. The recent loss of that A-50 Mainstay will only make them more cautious.
@mindyrolston3915
@mindyrolston3915 4 ай бұрын
I do not agree with the number three position. Like China Russia likes to lie about their capabilities and what they have
@Rogers_Ranger
@Rogers_Ranger 4 ай бұрын
ARMY 3rd we transport stuff
@Rogers_Ranger
@Rogers_Ranger 4 ай бұрын
Also Army has more 'boats " than Navy so we have the second biggest fleet too.
@MelNel5
@MelNel5 3 ай бұрын
I’m glad to see y’all learning about our military. It’s a very interesting subject, and one that I love viewing as well. I’m a native Texan, USA, and I’m very patriotic (like most Americans). NATO is the envy of the world, and we’re happy to add Finland, and Sweden to the family. Y’all are part of the family too. We ❤ you Brits. Cheers!
@russellgtyler8288
@russellgtyler8288 4 ай бұрын
The USAF is the largest air force in the world. The USN is the second largest air force in the world.
@rcslyman8929
@rcslyman8929 4 ай бұрын
Russia is the third largest air force on paper. Coincidentally, they're the third strongest army in Ukraine.
@CplCheeto
@CplCheeto 4 ай бұрын
​@@rcslyman8929nope, we have more military aircrafts sitting in our museums that are kept in operational order then Russia has in operational service. we keep them ready for the just in case we need them.
@rcslyman8929
@rcslyman8929 4 ай бұрын
@@CplCheeto That's the joke. "On paper".
@edkinj
@edkinj 4 ай бұрын
America made the shield for Israel and we fund it. Yall keep up the good work. Much love from Lawton Fort Sill Oklahoma
@nathanvega6281
@nathanvega6281 4 ай бұрын
Neighbor? From around Sheridan and gore.
@edkinj
@edkinj 4 ай бұрын
Around 79th And Quanah Parker. Small world lol
@nathanvega6281
@nathanvega6281 4 ай бұрын
I used to live at the apartments across the street from tractor supply. Truly a small world.
@bluflaam777
@bluflaam777 4 ай бұрын
I live across from Home Depot ....somehow I feel left out. 😥
@deeziebaby7241
@deeziebaby7241 4 ай бұрын
We contributed funding but had no involvement in its creation
@BryanW-bp3le
@BryanW-bp3le 4 ай бұрын
The U.S. and U.K. have very close ties and actually operate together mostly year round in and around the Middle East and are always training together along with other NATO and western countries.
@PurpleObscuration
@PurpleObscuration 4 ай бұрын
Glad to hear that
@bwana-ma-coo-bah425
@bwana-ma-coo-bah425 4 ай бұрын
and what would happen if the UK did not help the US?
@Sophie-ge7ti
@Sophie-ge7ti 4 ай бұрын
​@@bwana-ma-coo-bah425we'd dump the rest of the tea in the harbor.
@pedromelgar5646
@pedromelgar5646 2 ай бұрын
​@@Sophie-ge7ti yeee!
@MisterRoads
@MisterRoads 4 ай бұрын
I will watch every one of the military videos you make 50 times.
@yassandfats
@yassandfats 4 ай бұрын
Respect! This is all new to us so we got tons of new videos like this coming.
@lasher840
@lasher840 4 ай бұрын
Same
@PurpleObscuration
@PurpleObscuration 4 ай бұрын
Same here
@patrickwest2288
@patrickwest2288 4 ай бұрын
Agree 💯
@beesnestna9544
@beesnestna9544 4 ай бұрын
The Russian SU-57 isn't really a "stealth" aircraft. It has a RADAR cross-section similar to the American F-15 Eagle. It's actually more considered "low observable" than "stealth". In fact, all the SU-57s that Russia has are not official production models but rather "working prototypes" (still in development) which number somewhere in the 8 to 12 range. Hardly an intimidating lot. Stealth technology is extremely expensive to manufacture. Russia has had some serious setbacks with the proposed engines and even more serious setbacks in funding (basically, they can't afford to build them) especially since India (Russia's ally) withdrew funding from the program. After the abysmal performance of Russian weapons systems in Ukraine, India has finally decided to shop for more capable weapons from western allies like the USA and Europe. Russia has a long, storied history of grossly over-exaggerating it's military capabilities and weapons systems. Just look at the MIG-25 Foxbat or Yak-39 VTOL aircraft. Sadly, India has wasted trillions of rupees on inferior, obsolete and dated Russian weapons. Russia has consistently been 30 to 50 years behind western technology (depending on the specific type of technology). Most of the stealth technology that Russia and China possesses was stolen from the USA after one of the F-117 night hawks was shot down over Yugoslavia in 1999, and that was only because of a specific number of operational procedure deviations carried out by NATO on that particular night.😉
@markrichardson6455
@markrichardson6455 4 ай бұрын
The US military tech that is known today is 30 to 50 years behind what is unknown today. Example are lasers and rail guns.
@Etharel
@Etharel 3 ай бұрын
Anti grav, time travel, transportation, space ships, etc. Lasers and rail guns is 1970-1980 and we've already stopped almost all research into rail guns because we have much better/cheaper now.
@FREDRICKG85
@FREDRICKG85 29 күн бұрын
We have so much shit we don’t know about that’s why I feel comfortable not worrying about it, no one‘s gonna mess with NATO💯
@kokomo9764
@kokomo9764 4 ай бұрын
The video did not say that the UK had the second most powerful Navy. It said that the new UK aircraft carriers are technologically advanced. What it didn't say was that these carriers are much smaller and carry fewer planes than US carriers.
@dacbiet
@dacbiet 4 ай бұрын
And they are our most valuable ally/friend so combined with the USA, we dominate the seas.
@Longhauler85
@Longhauler85 2 ай бұрын
And as of right now, at least one of, if not both carriers, has a squadron or so of US Marine F-35's operating on them. The Royal Navy spent time on US Aircraft Carriers re-learning carrier operations in preparation for serving on HMS Queen Elizabeth.
@haveyouhuggedyourreptiletoday
@haveyouhuggedyourreptiletoday 2 ай бұрын
They also were made in conjunction with the US Navy.
@kokomo9764
@kokomo9764 4 ай бұрын
The nuclear missles carry multiple warheads. As many as 10 per missle. Each one of the warheads can be directed to different targets. So, one missle could take out up to 10 cities. Why do people think Israel has some sort of shield that prevents missles from hitting it? Obviously, they do not have anything like that. They have what they call the iron dome, but that is not an actual dome. It is simply a series of anti- ballistic missles that would attempt to destroy incoming missles. All major countries have similar systems.
@Weeks25
@Weeks25 4 ай бұрын
Yeah their iron dome is like 5 different systems that work together to stop incoming missiles. I don’t think understood the different between missiles (or rockets) and a nuke.
@kevinashley478
@kevinashley478 4 ай бұрын
So here you go. What you know we have, our military R&D is about 25-30 years ahead of that. As a Colonel once told me, "If you can think it up, it is probably already old tech to our R&D". And here is something to ponder. In the 70's and 80's there were a lot of UFO reports of bat shaped or boomerang shaped craft that were flying at high speeds and you couldn't hear them. Then, in the first gulf war, we had the B2's show up for the first time. There are a lot of people, myself included, that believe that the majority of UFO reports are actually the USA military testing its new toys. As a USA citizen and veteran, it scares me to think about what we really have. I mean hell, there was a show i watched, where there was biomechanical suits created for soldiers, that would allow them to lift something like 80% more than their max regular capacity. It had sensors that were linked to a program that allowed medics to monitor your vitals, and if you were injured, it would tell the medics the exact injuries. It also had a helmet with a full HUD, that would show your location in relation to other units and your target. Of course, at $600,000 a suit, it was deemed to be cost prohibitive by the DoD. And that was nearly 20 years ago.
@JNJ1983
@JNJ1983 4 ай бұрын
It's likely not a coincidence the U.S. far outscored the rest of the world on number of U.F.O. sightings.
@haveyouhuggedyourreptiletoday
@haveyouhuggedyourreptiletoday 2 ай бұрын
​@@JNJ1983Those suits were awesome and lots of fun. They were environmentally sealed and would allow more than 80% improvements if you pushed them. The biggest drawback to them was not them being cost prohibitive. It was the battery life. They would only run for about 30 minutes. When I got out they were still working on the batteries, but there are other far more impressive projects than that.
@LOLOLOPEZMAN
@LOLOLOPEZMAN 3 ай бұрын
I was Stationed at Fort Benning in 2011. The Paladins shooting their artillery on Saturday mornings was our alarm clock. lol
@brandonlevy8680
@brandonlevy8680 4 ай бұрын
Israel's 'Iron Dome' system was not made to defend against long range ballistic missiles. There are other assets that are incorporated into their air defense, but the actual system is made more for short range ballistic missiles, rockets and various other short range, little warning weapons. It CAN be used for that (ICBM's) as a last resort, but it is the wrong tool for the job.
@vagabondwastrel2361
@vagabondwastrel2361 4 ай бұрын
The short version is that the Iron Dome is just one layer of defense against Missles/rockets
@pauld6967
@pauld6967 4 ай бұрын
To answer her question, the personnel for the aircraft assigned to a carrier are in addition to the crew responsible for the operation of the ship.
@jrpearcey9352
@jrpearcey9352 4 ай бұрын
If you're in the military, every day you come home safe is a good day. The work is intrinsically dangerous. If you're going to put your life on the line, you might as well be fighting for human freedom and dignity as opposed to globalism and slavery. Thanks to all vets and freedom warfighters today.
@SuperChill-cm9wo
@SuperChill-cm9wo 4 ай бұрын
Most nuclear warheads don't hit the groune to explode. They explose in the air/sky.
@normanharris3177
@normanharris3177 4 ай бұрын
They can be programmed for airburst or bunker busting applications. Airburst will cause more fire and shockwave damage as in Hiroshima, ground burst will cause an area to be uninhabitable for decades. Hiroshima was visited just days after being leveled and radiation levels there required minimal levels of protection.
@jeromefriend2409
@jeromefriend2409 4 ай бұрын
It's America we built a gun and made it a airplane. A10 warthog
@MrTwisted003
@MrTwisted003 4 ай бұрын
One thing to take note, to put things in perspective, is most top countries have radar on their jets [or assisted] that can spot an object in the sky well over 100's of miles away. Then also have missiles on those plains that can lock onto those targets with their own radar (or guidance) from as little as 30 miles or less, to 100 and 120 miles away. And when I say "lock on", they will follow you where ever you go, some as fast as 2-4 times faster than those jets can fly, or more. Those "stealth" planes, with a RCS that small, you need to be around or less than 20-30 miles away for radar to see them, as close as your eyes can, practically. If you can see them (eyeballs or radar), either you're too late, or they weren't shooting at you. I'm no pro, so I may be off a smidge in details. And one thing these videos never touch on, is our special ops forces. The ones that could go in and dismantle a government, base, and/or situation before we ever fired a shot.
@oDv.
@oDv. 4 ай бұрын
Russia has been supersonic, we can't achieve that even. Not w/ all these military cuts anyway, we can barely afford defense. if that.
@MrTwisted003
@MrTwisted003 4 ай бұрын
@@oDv. Well, I would hope you're at least an ally of the US... One thing the US has is an over-abundance of military spending. We've got our allies backs though (I would hope), and we not only caught up to Russia and Germany some 80 years ago, in at least the areas we were actually lacking, but surpassed them by miles at a few points in time since.
@miketrusky476
@miketrusky476 2 ай бұрын
@@oDv. look up the Sprint MISSILE, your opinion is 60 years out of date. THE Falcon had a 6 ft launcher, did twice the speed of Sound in that distance. Nike Herc would like to talk with you.
@haveyouhuggedyourreptiletoday
@haveyouhuggedyourreptiletoday 2 ай бұрын
​@oDv. We decommissioned a jet built in the 1970's that was supersonic. I guess you never heard of the SR-71 Blackbird. Beyond that the U.S. has several aircraft and missiles that are currently supersonic. So, apparently your information is 50 years out of date. Yes, I know these things I was an armament specialist in the US military.
@MrTwisted003
@MrTwisted003 2 ай бұрын
@@haveyouhuggedyourreptiletoday she's my favorite bird! My Grandmother worked at Lockeed when she was still with us. Never forget seeing it up close and personal. I was a youngster then.
@axlFoleyBeverlyHillsPo
@axlFoleyBeverlyHillsPo 4 ай бұрын
You Should watch Some the Flyovers before NFL games! Superbowl is this Sunday. Flyovers are The most exciting few seconds before a match! They are so loud and cool!
@daveshereman8764
@daveshereman8764 4 ай бұрын
Peace through strength.
@ccormx
@ccormx 4 ай бұрын
There’s a couple interesting videos that speak on how and why the US has been able to become so dominant. One is “US Enemies are not going to like this” and another called “geography made the US OP” something like that.
@angryoverlanding5955
@angryoverlanding5955 4 ай бұрын
We have the ability to use an “EMP” electro magnetic pulse, which can shut down almost all electronics unless they are specifically shielded against it. EMP is a side effect of a nuclear detonation but can also be deployed by itself as a weapon. Imagine everything in a region that uses electricity stopping. The power grid going down, cars & trucks stopping on the roads and no ability to clear them, not being able to get parts to repair the infrastructure. Then getting nuked 😢
@IdahoRanchGirl
@IdahoRanchGirl 4 ай бұрын
Cars before a certain year wouldn't be affected. But there would be no way to fuel them.
@angryoverlanding5955
@angryoverlanding5955 4 ай бұрын
@@IdahoRanchGirl true, I’m also not sure if it affects vehicles that were not running at the time, but the impact nevertheless would be devastating.
@Badger77722
@Badger77722 4 ай бұрын
@@angryoverlanding5955 Doesn't matter if an appliance (including vehicles) is running or not when an EMP hits, basically if it's got a computer chip in it, the chip gets fried. The EMP creates an induction current in a circuit, which fries the conductors in the circuit, i.e. the semi-conductors in a computer chip short-circuit and get fried. The only way to protect it is to put the device in an environment where the induction current can't get to it, i.e. shielded in a metallic cage so the induction current runs through the cage, not the devices inside it.
@angryoverlanding5955
@angryoverlanding5955 4 ай бұрын
@@Badger77722 Ah, thanks for the information
@haveyouhuggedyourreptiletoday
@haveyouhuggedyourreptiletoday 2 ай бұрын
​@@Badger77722A precomputer car with the battery disconnected would be safe. No circuit. An appliance that is unplugged would also be safe unless it had internal batteries. For EMP to work it needs a complete circuit.
@lucywin8000
@lucywin8000 4 ай бұрын
Are you serious saying “Let me get this straight there are 70 aircrafts on the ship..does that mean they have people in the ship that are ready to battle” 😂😂
@Noneofyourbizniz1
@Noneofyourbizniz1 4 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂
@bobbombar6711
@bobbombar6711 4 ай бұрын
Actually in wartime a normal liadout is 90 aircraft
@btsforever1872
@btsforever1872 4 ай бұрын
@@bobbombar6711 True, I think she was referring to the lady in video statement about people in the ship ready for battle. 😂😂 As if US will spend billions on an aircraft carrier with billions of dollars in military equipment on board without soldiers ready for conflict.
@PurpleObscuration
@PurpleObscuration 4 ай бұрын
In addition to that, a US carrier group will have thirty supply ships and submarines as part of the US carrier group
@Noneofyourbizniz1
@Noneofyourbizniz1 4 ай бұрын
@@PurpleObscuration30? Where do u get that number from? That’s is not true. They will have a supply ship that will go ashore and get supplies and catch up with them. A carrier strike group typically has 7-8 ships and 1-2 submarines at time. Not bo 30 ships
@slugtothechest
@slugtothechest 4 ай бұрын
6:42 Marines are also on some of those boats
@BMF6889
@BMF6889 4 ай бұрын
Marines are part of the Department of the Navy although it has a separate budget for most equipment. For example, the US Navy buys all of the Marine aircraft and allow the Marines to paint "Marines" on their sides. However, the Marines buy all of the supporting ground equipment for those aircraft. While not likely, the Navy does have the ability to take back Marine aircraft to make them Navy fighters. However, the Navy has no requirement for the Marine F-35B and all Marine fighter pilots are trained by the Navy and most Marine pilots are carrier qualified and normally a Marine fighter squadron is deployed with every Navy aircraft carrier that is deployed, but not on the carriers that are in port as they return to their Marine air stations until the next deployment. Also there has been a Marine F-35B squadron deployed aboard the HMS Queen Elizabeth since it has been on deployments. I don't know how long that relationship will last, but it is ongoing as of today. This is likely to continue until the UK has enough F-35Bs to fully support the UK carriers.
@mikebalzano2108
@mikebalzano2108 4 ай бұрын
There’s actually way more than 5, not to mention that the new military branch that the president announced in 2019 it’s called space force and who knows what they have technology these days.
@252reptiles
@252reptiles 4 ай бұрын
6th reason - our civilian population has more guns than most militarys
@kennethsmith6367
@kennethsmith6367 4 ай бұрын
We have guns than our own military!😂🤣😂🤣
@kdsuibhne
@kdsuibhne 4 ай бұрын
American deer hunters are the third largest army. It is an army full of snipers.
@Alrapter
@Alrapter 4 ай бұрын
⁠@@kdsuibhneweren’t hunters the origin of today’s snipers? Don’t know for sure but it is a possibility,
@Sophie-ge7ti
@Sophie-ge7ti 4 ай бұрын
No one is invading the US by land. That's why our enemies are tearing us apart from the inside with propaganda and cyber attacks. Your guns do nothing against this kind of warfare.
@kdsuibhne
@kdsuibhne 4 ай бұрын
@@Alrapter stalkers and gamekeepers were the origins of the British snipers. They were the first military snipers to wear ghillie suits. Our original “snipers” had to be trained. We had excellent shots in the wars prior to WWI, but they weren’t called snipers.
@beardown555
@beardown555 4 ай бұрын
The Brits are close allies with America. We fight together.
@Killerbee223
@Killerbee223 3 ай бұрын
My father was a contractor that supplied the fueling system for the F-117 Nighthawk and also the F-22 Raptor at Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico. I’ve seen some pretty cool aviation shit in my day 👍🏽👍🏽
@charissanomdeplume6475
@charissanomdeplume6475 2 ай бұрын
Lucky…
@swoesteban5570
@swoesteban5570 18 күн бұрын
You hit the nail on the head with that one. This is why Americans tear up when the anthem is played. Remembering the people who have given their lives and will give their lives for America.
@realfeeltalktv6207
@realfeeltalktv6207 4 ай бұрын
UK has a long history of having a formidable navy.
@justinedse8435
@justinedse8435 21 күн бұрын
@realfeeltalktv6207 Yup, in 1776 they were the world's largest navy for the war.
@Asmodai.
@Asmodai. 4 ай бұрын
Iron dome is onky good against slow moving target like conventional missiles and mortar shells, ICBMs like minuteman 3 move at hypersonic speed making them almost impossible to stop
@PurpleObscuration
@PurpleObscuration 4 ай бұрын
Laser beams are real
@Hmmmmmmmm320
@Hmmmmmmmm320 4 ай бұрын
@11:22 regarding Israeli air defense systems. Their Iron Dome is used to defend against rocket and low altitude missile strikes. They also have another air defense system named Davids Sling to defend against aircraft, ICBMS, and other high altitude threats.
@psrandy1
@psrandy1 15 күн бұрын
The Nimitz class is now smaller than the Ford Class. The Nimitz class carries 5,000 sailors and 70 aircraft each.
@broadmeadowluck
@broadmeadowluck 4 ай бұрын
Did you know that SR-71 wasn't equipped with guns because it was so to fast.
@greywuuf
@greywuuf 4 ай бұрын
Think about who built the israeli missle defense system. Hint it was the US, you think we would a tually sell defenses that we dont know how to counter?
@Badger77722
@Badger77722 4 ай бұрын
UK and US aircraft carriers are designed and operate very differently. US carriers displace about 100K tons; UK carriers displace about 72K tons. US carriers operate with what are called "angled" flight decks, where the aircraft landing are at an angle to the way the ship is heading, but aircraft taking off use a separate area that is parallel to the ship's heading; UK carriers only have a single flight deck, which is parallel to the way the ship is heading. US carriers use a steam-operated catapult system to launch aircraft, accelerating the aircraft along the flight deck at high speed to achieve takeoff speed. UK carriers use a "ski ramp" where the aircraft accelerate down the flight deck and use an up-sloped ramp to give them enough lift to take off. Because the aircraft on a US carrier don't depend solely on their own engines to achieve takeoff speed on the short flight deck, much heavier loads and aircraft can be launched from a US carrier. US carriers carry around 5,000 personnel on board; UK carriers can carry up to 1,600. US carriers use nuclear reactors to generate power; UK carriers use conventional steam/electric generators. US carriers operate with up to 90 aircraft (fixed wing and helicopters) aboard during wartime conditions; UK carriers carry approximately 40 aircraft (fixed wing and helicopters). Currently, I believe the US is operating 13 aircraft carriers; the UK operates 2.
@normanharris3177
@normanharris3177 4 ай бұрын
The Ford Class on station in the Mediterranean uses EMALS--electromagnetic launch system. The Nimitz of which there are 10-9 deployed use steam. The Nimitz carriers will be gradually replaced by Ford class ships with the next one scheduled for combat deployment in 2024 IIRC, Funny how nobody mentions our nuclear attack and Ohio Class subs. If China decides to attack Taiwan they will weigh in heavily, If somebody were stupid enough to launch ICBMs at the US, they probably would not live long enough to verify impact. Moscow...12 minutes or less from these platforms. Ever wonder how many subs are cruising undetected in the South China Sea?
@haveyouhuggedyourreptiletoday
@haveyouhuggedyourreptiletoday 2 ай бұрын
​@@normanharris3177Do not forget the Ford is slightly larger than the Nimitz as well displacing 120k instead of just 100k has 6 more CWIS and combat load out is 100 not 90 aircraft. Plus lots more.
@artjensen994
@artjensen994 15 күн бұрын
As am American. I can say we do appreciate it. The men and women of the military are heros. All of them. Not everything is great in the US. But those awesome men and women keep us safe and honestly protect the world
@jonsinclair3997
@jonsinclair3997 4 ай бұрын
There are Lazer weapons now.
@miketrusky476
@miketrusky476 2 ай бұрын
Reagan funded that 40 years ago. Called it "Starwars".
@smallnuts2
@smallnuts2 4 ай бұрын
As a veteran also should of included how man civilians have weapons because of our 2nd Amendment . So if a country did invade we also have civilians who would fight.
@jerryglenn7323
@jerryglenn7323 2 ай бұрын
UK and United States are brothers and sisters. We have been close 150 plus years. Together we are the force for good, and keeping supplies moving worldwide since. We Americans and English are a force for good.
@Animo2006
@Animo2006 4 ай бұрын
So, the main thing about ICBM's (the nukes) is that they go above the atmosphere and re-enter the atmosphere above their intended target. Re-entry into earths atmosphere has these missiles travelling well above mach 10, which is way too fast for anything to intercept them besides laser weapons. They are literally un-counterable weapons unless you have a particularly advanced and powerful laser weapon. The only two countries in the world right now that the U.S. would be most unlikely to use these on would be Russia and China simply because of a philosophy called M.A.D. (mutually assured destruction). This has been in play since the cold war and essentially what it means is that If they fire nukes at us or vice versa, we fire nukes back and we all get destroyed. This is currently the most likely scenario for humanity to destroy itself and has been since the Cuban Missile Crisis.
@karenanderson8830
@karenanderson8830 4 ай бұрын
We're friends with Israel here in the United states. No need to try to break through their defense.
@davidkeese3372
@davidkeese3372 4 ай бұрын
Wow just watched the operation praying mantis video earlier and commented about doing this video. Didn’t realize it was on your list already. Awesome
@striker2588
@striker2588 2 ай бұрын
5:30 The answer to the question does America and the UK share technology is Yes and a great example of this is the Nuclear tech sharing & cooperation that has being going on for over 50 years. 11:00 The Israeli Iron Dome is a short range air defense system specializing in rocket and mortar attacks, but Israel does operate several other longer range systems.
@PappaPurps79
@PappaPurps79 2 ай бұрын
I’m American, but even I know the long navy tradition in the UK. Yes, it’s a small country but through much of the recent 500 or 600 years its Naval dominance made it a superpower through most of the Middle Ages, Victorian, and renaissance eras.
@alexp1873
@alexp1873 4 ай бұрын
Israel Iron Dome is a US product
@davidgk2005
@davidgk2005 4 ай бұрын
The worlds largest navy is china, since they count any boat with a gun onboard 😂 the strongest navy is American. The second strongest is i believe Americas museum fleet of retired warships😅
@davidqueenann3947
@davidqueenann3947 4 ай бұрын
Israel's Iron Dome system is for downing small, short term rockets. They do have a mid-range interception systems, and some US supplied Arrow systems for intercepting long-range missiles, but those aren't intended to intercept ICBMs.
@dwhite849
@dwhite849 20 күн бұрын
The British Navy ruled the seas for a long long time - they still are a formidable force.
@slimteeslim7845
@slimteeslim7845 4 ай бұрын
Is it just me or does she look like a lighter version of nicki minaj 🤔
@TheCowboysrock8
@TheCowboysrock8 4 ай бұрын
😭😭
@golfr-kg9ss
@golfr-kg9ss 4 ай бұрын
I'm a little disappointed about your knowledge of the Royal Navy. That's how the UK become one of the largest empires in world history. It's only since WWII that the US navy eclipsed the Royal navy. With that said one of the things the gets most overlooked about the strength of the US is it's friends. How many of the top 10 economies in the world are allied with the US? China is the only 1 I can think of that isn't. Russia is just outside the top 10 at 11.
@jdwilmoth
@jdwilmoth 4 ай бұрын
But we all know if it wasn't for the Americans the British would be speaking German right now And I don't consider these other top 10 economies allies I consider them a burden I'm sure the US taxpayer is tired of putting the bill to protect the so-called allies
@lucywin8000
@lucywin8000 4 ай бұрын
@@jdwilmoth 👏👏👏
@charissanomdeplume6475
@charissanomdeplume6475 2 ай бұрын
Our allies are part of our strength…undoubtedly.
@jdwilmoth
@jdwilmoth 2 ай бұрын
@@charissanomdeplume6475 yeah as long as we put the bill I know they are not part of our strength they need us we don't need them
@bobbombar6711
@bobbombar6711 4 ай бұрын
The nuke warheads are now 455 kiloton . Also each. Missle can carry up to 12 warheads . Currently all u.s fixed wing aircraft except the a- 10 are capable of carring nuke tripped weopns / bombs . They have nearly finished clearing a combat capable directed energy weapons system for the all the aircraft of the u.s. military
@isaacs9022
@isaacs9022 Күн бұрын
Another reason is our soldiers. They are not conscripts. U.S. military are volunteers, highly trained, well equipped and seasoned. Especially our special forces units such as rangers , green berets, seals, delta force etc. You might want to do a reaction on this. And you might want to check out our newest stealth SR-72 . It does about 6,000 mph, armed and is undetectable.
@jeffherdz
@jeffherdz 4 ай бұрын
F.Y.I. Guys our newest carriers. The Gerald R. Ford class CVN-78 can carry over 90 aircraft. 10 more are planned for the future. costing $12 billion U.S. Dollars each.
@damonbryan7232
@damonbryan7232 4 ай бұрын
To think. No other nation or empire in history has had such a economic and technology advantage. Then not use it for conquests.
@janetjohnson2162
@janetjohnson2162 Күн бұрын
Our new carrier the Gerald Ford is even bigger than the Nimitz
@Christobanistan
@Christobanistan 22 күн бұрын
The Israeli Iron Dome and the US Patriot Defense Missile systems are jointly developed. They use the same technology.
@SN-uv4mh
@SN-uv4mh 4 ай бұрын
England and the United States They are not just allies. But they are brothers and shoulder to shoulder together, no matter what happens to the United States, England will always be on the side of the United States.🇺🇲🇬🇧
@trouble97018
@trouble97018 4 ай бұрын
The stealth planes take out the defenses-then come something REALLY scary. The B-52.
@janetcameron4652
@janetcameron4652 2 ай бұрын
Grandpa BUFF forever.
@ronbusby4596
@ronbusby4596 4 ай бұрын
The military agreement is called "The five eyes" which encompasses The United States, Great Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.
@juanalfaro8816
@juanalfaro8816 Ай бұрын
We also have Texas and Florida who are fully equipped with artillery by its residents.
@jameswebster3276
@jameswebster3276 2 ай бұрын
I was in the US Navy 30 years ago. We were doing things the that are still classified (not know to the public) to this day.
@wellitsjustG
@wellitsjustG 2 ай бұрын
y'all must have gotten torched in the comment from the Operation Praying Mantis video. I watched that and realized you guys just never had a reason to look into it. I can appreciate that you came back on this one and say hey we are here to learn. That's great. Y'all got a new subscriber. Thanks for the content! Also. historically being an Island Empire the UK Navy has been world class. It dominated for probably 200 years if I had to guess and didn't get passed by the US until WW2. There is a rich, proud and potent tradition there the as an American I definitely have respect for. IDK - Iron dome vs minuteman icbm is an interesting matchup, but at the end of the day each middle carries 10 independently targetable warheads. We have hundreds of missles if not thousands. US could litteraly make it rain nuclear warheads. 330KT payload wouldn't need very many to glass the entire country. You think the US doesn't have IRON DOME and Lazers and DPD and railguns and possible targetable EMP weapons? I'm a nobody, but I would bet they do. Ahah!!! the trillion dollar question! Very good- what role does AI play?
@carolynkovacs5412
@carolynkovacs5412 4 ай бұрын
And just think how very young the pilots are, amazing
@hellhound1389
@hellhound1389 4 ай бұрын
We just debuted the Gerald R Ford super carrier. The F22 can't be sold to our allies. We didn't design it to fight the Russians or Chinese we designed it to fight the F15. We've been the superior force since the 70s. We've got the capabilities to take out a satellite from the ground. And we could do that 30 years ago
@ManCheetah294
@ManCheetah294 2 ай бұрын
2:44 "But are they allowed" . Trusting that reaction from the Brits is how we won the revolution haha
@georgiaann4402
@georgiaann4402 3 ай бұрын
I believe I read that the US is now at 11 Naval strike teams. One is in the Red sea with another sitting ready to assist if necessary. We've definitely increased our air/land and sea since 2017.
@davidrowell
@davidrowell Ай бұрын
Great vids! Keep up the good work y'all... Hope the two of you can make it to a visit to Fort Worth where I live to get some awesome BBQ, rodeo and authentic Texas friendliness and culture. FYI I live across town (about 6 miles or so) but can still hear the fighter engine tests at Lockheed Martin. When I was in high school the manufacturing plant was run by General Dynamics... the home of the F16 fighter. Being at GD airshows and seeing the F16 in action drove me to study aerospace engineering in college...
@PartOfTheGame
@PartOfTheGame 2 ай бұрын
Caveat to videos like this: This is only what we've SHOWN we can do. This is the stuff we've admitted to being able to produce.
@georgespicer5028
@georgespicer5028 2 ай бұрын
An aircraft carrier has a crew of over 3000 sailors. They're like a floating city
@kdeez4971
@kdeez4971 4 ай бұрын
You should watch, How geography made the US so ridiculously op. Very informative. 😉
@darylfreeman7185
@darylfreeman7185 22 күн бұрын
We love you guys keep it up,and if you ever come to Texas hit us up
@jnlaf
@jnlaf 4 ай бұрын
It enjoyable watching you guys do these videos,
@hitman456
@hitman456 3 ай бұрын
I was in the U.S. Navy from 1980-1994. My first ship was a Nimitz class carrier. Our crew was from 5000-6000 personnel depending on the deployment mission. A floating city. the length of the ship was around 1100 feet.
@DebiB53
@DebiB53 24 күн бұрын
Sending Love and Peace from an American...❤🤍💙
@user-iq5oj5pt7o
@user-iq5oj5pt7o 3 ай бұрын
I'm a fourth generation vet and the youngest of four brothers who served, my dad and his four brothers served in WW2 and so on going back through my generational history. I went in a week after turning 17 and did 4 years with the US Army, 1st Inf. Before I was old enough to drink. Yeah i see things different than most.
@bariman223
@bariman223 4 ай бұрын
Actually, the numbers have been shrinking for years. ONE OF the reasons is that military vehicles have been increasing in their capabilities while increasing in price.
@kenhutch7727
@kenhutch7727 4 ай бұрын
During the Serbia war, they did shoot down a nighthawk.
@nursekate6772
@nursekate6772 Ай бұрын
The craziest part about all these stats, is that this is just what we're TOLD the US has. Just imagine what we have that is classified!!
@tedsmith1224
@tedsmith1224 4 ай бұрын
The US already has AI controlled F-16 fighter jets it uses for training pilots in dogfighting, They are in the final stages of producing autonomous "Dedicated Wingman" jets to fight along with F-35 and Nextgen fighters.
@PaulsWanderings
@PaulsWanderings 28 минут бұрын
Aircraft carriers don't have much in the way of self-defense capability so they need all of the other support.
@truegrit2060
@truegrit2060 4 ай бұрын
(1:30) well now be have the B-21 Bomber that recently got realist. Also we have the Rapid Dragon program and the Switch Blade program. Just the name a couple.🤔
@maximus11400
@maximus11400 2 ай бұрын
The USA also has the worlds best battle Tank. The M1 series tank is a very bad boy! I know first hand. I drove the M1A1 for 4 years and in the first Gulf War!.
@jaydawg-we6yc
@jaydawg-we6yc 4 ай бұрын
The new technology is particle and laser beam weapons, they will be used all types of drones and anti aircraft systems, you cannot target something travelling at almost the speed of light!
@DRAONWEED
@DRAONWEED 4 ай бұрын
U.S.A. has 11 nuclear-powered super carriers, Each carrier is escorted by a strike group of surface vessels & an undisclosed number of submarines, total weight of the U.S.N is around 3.4 million tons of whoop ass. A U.S. sailor would tell a Russian sailor," hold my beer while I kiss your girlfriend."
@ericurdiales8978
@ericurdiales8978 Ай бұрын
Keep in mind, these are what we’re allowed to know about. Imagine what is under wraps, and classified. You know there are much more classified weapons we keep secret so as not to alert enemy countries that we have them.
@robertkenney6752
@robertkenney6752 2 ай бұрын
We were not ready for WW2 but we adapted quickly. We do not want war. But we keep going home and try to disappear, but we keep getting pulled into war regardless. After WW2 we began to establish overseas bases and created a large standing military. If we must then let's prepare.
@BlackWhirlwindSett
@BlackWhirlwindSett 3 ай бұрын
Depending on the class of US Aircraft carrier there is 3,800-4,500 sailers on board. That is bigger than some small towns in the US.
Smart Sigma Kid #funny #sigma #comedy
00:19
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 23 МЛН
Please be kind🙏
00:34
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 176 МЛН
NERF WAR HEAVY: Drone Battle!
00:30
MacDannyGun
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
Пробую самое сладкое вещество во Вселенной
00:41
Zones of Progress: The Past, Present and Future of Special Economic Zones
19:20
Free Cities Foundation
Рет қаралды 4,1 М.
British Couple Reacts to Top 7 Badass Planes of the US Military
14:49
This is why China Don’t Mess with the US Military
10:46
Yass & Fats
Рет қаралды 16 М.
British Couple Reacts to 10 Most Dangerous Animals In The USA
15:56
ПРЕДСКАЗАТЕЛЬ БУДУЮЩЕГО
1:00
КиноХост
Рет қаралды 4,1 МЛН
THEY WANTED TO TAKE ALL HIS GOODIES 🍫🥤🍟😂
0:17
OKUNJATA
Рет қаралды 4,4 МЛН
Why didn’t Nika like my long and beautiful nails? #cat #cats
0:25
Princess Nika cat
Рет қаралды 132 МЛН
Ақтөре неге студияға келді😳 Бір Болайық! 25.06.24
27:05
Бір болайық / Бир Болайык / Bir Bolayiq
Рет қаралды 301 М.