Petropavlovsk - Random Battle Monster

[@Flamuu]

I genuinely don't comprehend why they felt this ship needed such low concealment values with a 12km radar. The game should be moving away from mechanics that lack counter-play, not towards them. Stream: www.twitch.tv/flamuu Insta: instagram.com/flamugram/ Twitter: twitter.com/flamuchz Discord: discord.gg/Flamu

[@goooooller9353]

This game is just straight up broken and it cannot be denied at this point.

[@Aho0711]

Even funnier now that you mention it, is that the smoke fire penalty for petropav is 9,5 km.......... Nevsky the counterpart that is classed as light cruiser is 10 😂

[@V-V1875-h]

Stealth radar, BB grade AP, tanky, THIS IS BULLSHIT, only 285mm should be able to citadel BBs, not some 220mm puny guns

[@Scotzie69]

Because it's a russisn ship! That's the same reason about Smolensk, Slava and many other russian ships, which never existed in real.

[@vuksy1]

Citadeled DM through the nose somehow last game🤣

[@Youshinaka]

Don't worry, WG will surely slightly nerf the AA in 3 or 4 months

[@Espere]

Soviet bias is a myth.

[@Sky_Guy]

@@Espere An irrelevant point. The Petropavlovsk could fly the Austro-Hungarian flag and still be busted as shit.

[@V-V1875-h]

This ship is so hilariously overpowered I would like to fire the person who sayd this was a good idea

[@tenchi5951]

Maybe increase the pen by 30% so it over penerates german citadel.

[@dinjoe828]

@@Espere Yeah, sure buddy, sure.....

[@seavee2000]

Gosh, these commie chaps were such amazing ship builders. Strange no one ever heard of them-Iron curtain??

[@sleepygryph]

You're right I completely forgot about the Iron Curtain project and how it can render units invulnerable

[@luisnunes2010]

@@sleepygryph Don't give them ideas!

[@hubristicmystic]

They should just have different stats on different servers. In Russia soviet ships dominate, in China Chinese ships dominate, in the rest of the world realistic stats because we grew up in free democratic societies, have healthy egos and value truth, morality and fair play

[@vardansarkisyan3027]

John C and stupidity

[@bertjesklotepino]

@@vardansarkisyan3027 mostly stupidity as you have just seen

[@pranav3848]

Best Battleships in the game: Slava, Kremlin Best Heavy Cruisers in the game: Stalingrad, Petropavlovsk Best light Cruisers in the game: Smolensk, Al. Nevsky Might as well rename the game to World of Soviet Fantasy

[@lost4356]

wait for soviet CV

[@zvxzw]

More and more like WOT

[@ivanvenema5052]

Do some research before commenting

[@sobolanul82]

It's not a problem they add non constructed ships with most of them existed only on papers. For example the German BB line had to be stopped at Bismarck because FDG and GK never existed, only on papers. The problem is in balance department because they add more OP ships. WOWS with only constructed ships it will be very boring because of the few ships.

[@Chrinik]

@@sobolanul82 the problem is that real ships ran into real life and thus naturally had limiting factors. Paper designs dont have that and thus its on to the balancing department to know what they are doing...and they don't.

[@MegTheWarpsmith]

When soviet crusier have much better armour than upcomming "slow US battleships"

[@Ermy1996]

Mobility scooters for americans

[@JainZar1]

My exact thought. If 32 mm plating isn't even heavy cruiser level, how tf does Wargaming expect it to be adequate for a BB?

[@Ermy1996]

@@JainZar1 is not the platin g the problem, there are plenty of 32mm plating bbs. Problme is that are slow and dont fit the meta at all

[@atanassimeonov5138]

Russian ships are made from God's paper and the spread sheet says they are fine! WG are going in the same direction with Wows as they with WoT I stopped playing WoT a while back before 2 years and moved to WoWS but now I'm not having much fun anymore. Balance is off the table for a long time. Unfortunately I think that they are killing WoWS for EU and NA as they killed WoT. Even CIS back in the days didn't like the power that all soviet brings to WoT, I'm sure that they don't like it now as well...

[@fg3893]

the plating absolutely is a problem. Even the fast US BBs have more armor, which is rather ridiculous

[@orangedream267]

I actually vomited at you de-gunning that JB. Absolutely insane.

[@legendofthefall7082]

Jean Bart deserves it. That ship is stupidly overpowered for Tier 9.

[@ya7ioo]

@@legendofthefall7082 yeah lol

[@admiralfloofz658]

@@legendofthefall7082 Althou the guns break all the time so its pretty crap for 1vs1 brawling.

[@ShawFujikawa]

Gonna have to really doubt that you actually vomited, dude.

[@victorvondoom4869]

LegendOfTheFall only when u get good position to catch broadside, if not then she is not gonna do much with a lot of HE spammers rightnow

[@Subha95]

bad long range dispersion, yeah I would like this dispersion on my Bismarck and Gk then

[@onepunchbud1472]

So true... And Bismarck does not have a 9s reload

[@tschagalaga]

@xellossaxon you should check against how many nations germany was fighting. Hitler made bad decisions, thats all... In the beginning of WW2 was the german army rolling over the oponents. Russia was not even prepared for this. And what happend at the french coast was at the end a big loose for the allies, if you remember that the german defense line not even was finished. Guns was missing and all the people there...

[@tschagalaga]

@xellossaxon the t34 was killing the panzer 3 and 4. Therefor was germany in need to do something. Tje Panther was the answer to the t34 problem... But okay, have nothing with warships to do right now...

[@NoFramesPerSecond3924]

@@onepunchbud1472 11s

[@NoFramesPerSecond3924]

@@tschagalaga The German surface fleet was MOSTLY outdated and old, but WG has been going a bit hard on them (yes I am aware that the high seas fleet had very modern ships for its time, I mean the surface fleet of nzi Germany)

[@bufferbuffer7320]

11:30 Good thing we don't have real waves in the game. There's a reason why ships have some freeboard. That thing would have a so bad stability, it might pull a Vasa-stunt when maneuvering in the slightest of swell

[@merobo5066]

@@neonlight1214 iirc parts of the Atlantic and the North Sea are worse than the Pacific for ships with low freeboard, or at least more consistently awful.

[@Gabriel-sdf]

These ships were probably designed for the black sea or something, they don't have wave problems there

[@merobo5066]

@@Gabriel-sdf I guess they are somewhat based on Black Sea and Baltic Sea only designs (whether limiting your heavy cruisers area of operation this much by design is a good idea is a completely different discussion).

[@OslikusPrime]

@@Gabriel-sdf No, these ships ere not designed. Don confuse designed ships with fake WG's dreams.

[@batrastardly4574]

Actually the reduced freeboard only reduces the ships reserve buoyancy. Heavy waves make little difference with all hatches secured. You must be thinking of open boats like a dinghy or a small fishing boat ... or the Vasa. Ships I was on would "submarine" through heavy waves without taking on water. If anything, the lowered freeboard would produce less roll from my experience.

[@paulmayer8782]

I think it should be balanced by auto sinking in storms and stuff...

[@ringowunderlich2241]

guess a hard turn also qualifies.

[@LeonardoFSI]

@@ringowunderlich2241 I would say it doesn't, as this things doesn't do "hard turns". For the rest, I agree. Edit: Also: barrel life is 3 salvos before starting to loose accuracy at all distances.

[@FrigidFriar]

Ludicrous AP, improved pen angles, amazing shell velocity, great accuracy at any *relevant* range, 360 degree turrets, better reload than much worse guns at same tier, good range with ridiculous pen out to max, great concealment, great armour, layered citadel. Good AA. Radar. Hydro. Oh and it's so low in the water it's a tiny target. Downsides: ? It's OP and I'm tired of pretending the Soviet 'design philosophy' is anything other than to be OP with good everything with best armour and best guns. It's not even funny. It has every gimmick as well as being amazing in every stat.

[@vae9430]

Downsides : - very clumsy - radar is 15 seconds - awful dispersion at long range - incredibly bad HE DPM making the ship completely helpless against bow on ships

[@belladesa91]

@@vae9430 way too little. Other cruisers are basically pointless to play now. Radar in 15 seconds? Who gives a shit while u hv 11 SECOND RELOAD guns with 220's penning like 380's...

[@victorvondoom4869]

Va e 15s radar but u can stealth radar lol

[@slenderman478]

@@victorvondoom4869 So fucking what? As a DD you can easily bowtank that radar, he'll get 4k dmg if he's lucky with that crap horizontal dispersion.

[@slenderman478]

@@belladesa91 Except that any other fucking cruiser at T10 will shit on this thing. If you know what angling means, this ship is not nearly as OP as Mr. Russian Bias here shows. It's funny how the entire competetive community agrees on this fact.

[@KaijuAlert]

Insane pen, high velocity shells, short AP fuse, impossibly low silhouette, 360 degree turrets, low concealment, low air concealment, strong AA, solid armour, good hitpoint, stealth radar capability. Once again, Russian ships get all the toys. Why would anyone grind Goliath with this thing in the game?

[@bismuth8394]

Mastodon2 Music I’m wondering whether it’s worth continuing the IJN cruiser line, faced my first petro yesterday in my mogami it was not fun :(

[@g6g401]

@@bismuth8394 LoL IJN cruisers

[@OslikusPrime]

Nah, the right question is, why to continue to play this pathetic parody. I asked myself, and then I realized, that I had enough. I quit.

[@hotpenguin607]

Other nations are fodders to the russian

[@tommeakin1732]

The Royal Navy: The most significant and influential navy the world have ever seen WG: *Haha HE go boom*

[@theogeitondasamphilochos5630]

Remember what happened to brave Russian pre dreadnoughts at Battle of Tsushima which sat dangerously low because of overload and miss calculation...☹️ Yeah, off course I remember it, because I'm Japanese🇯🇵 We won't forget tragedies of our honorable enemies...(｀･ω･´)ゞ

[@Jtretta]

I'm surprised you did not mention the Kamchatka. There is also the fact that a ship by the name Petropavlovsk, Admiral Makarov's flagship, struck a mine and sank in short order. Drachinfel's video on the prior journey is quite an entertaining watch.

[@luisnunes2010]

@@Jtretta Horrifyingly hilarious video!

[@theogeitondasamphilochos5630]

@@b-17gflyingfortress6 Remember USN and RN were still building battleships in 40s and IJN tried to build carriers like crazy as last ditch effort... In the end, we had no chance to win no matter what we did🙃

[@wtpiv6041]

Jtretta Having a small zoo of venomous snakes on board probably doesn’t help. Especially when one gets stuck on a gun barrel...

[@ottovonbismarck2443]

@@Jtretta I was just about to warn you of incoming enemy torpedo boats. That episode on Drachinifel's excellent channel is more of a comedy wasn't it for the actual loss of life. I still wet my pants though ... Now don't throw your glasses at me ! :-)

[@FLUX.2226]

That poor Jean Bart lmao Of course the battle was basically over at that point, but getting both of your *battleship* turrets consistently knocked out by a *cruiser* until they are fully destroyed, I can't help but feel sorry for them.

[@tiaanbekker7703]

The same happened to me in a North Carolina. Had one front turret left. I could Cit a kremlin but could not do it to this thing.

[@TheGreatBoomy25]

But nerf Venezia, and release this thing. What a great company.

[@carson5066]

Nerf a ship that didn't need a nerf and then release a ship like this 🤦‍♂️ GG WG. GG.

[@jlo8863]

Counter Petro is easy than venezia

[@RoydeanEU]

@@carson5066 Venezia needs a nerf though its sap is way to strong, it basickly ignores angling and pens bow in ships it can't over pen so is at a point where a good venzai salvo can one shot a full hp gearing and the gearing can't even turn in since the SAP never bounces

[@matty_mccarthy]

RoydeanEU your kidding it’s DPM isn’t that great with a 15-19sec reload limited with a 50mm pen. They actually neft the turning circle no? Not to mention it concealment problems especially with a cv in the game

[@carson5066]

@@matty_mccarthy they also nerfed the guns, giving it a 21.5 base reload iirc

[@BloodyRulez]

If this thing would move on the atlantic it would go down with the first wave 😂

[@CpActivity]

It wouldnt even get to the Atlantic!

[@OslikusPrime]

Yeah, with the very first wave, caused by leaving slipway.

[@OslikusPrime]

@Nguyen Johnathan You're either blind, dumb, troll or all of that.

[@tschagalaga]

enlighten the people why... do you think this is the first or last ship with low hull going over the Atlantic? kzbin.info/www/bejne/jpeXlmeggbmLZrc

[@weeaboobarko]

Petropavlovsk sits so low in the water they should add a feature where if you turn too fast you capsize and sink, I think that would make for very fun and engaging gameplay

[@imjashingyou3461]

Id say its what a 30k ton cruiser that has less fretboard then a destroyer?

[@LurifaxDK]

Welcome to "the magical adventures of the Russian imaginary navy"

[@n1q0la52]

I had the misfortune of sharing the same flank with an enemy triple Petro division in my GK. I had 3 other cruisers with me and they had a Montana. My cruisers evaporated around me and I pretty much single handedly dealt with the Montana. When I was inevitably killed by them I had 2.8 million potential damage, and they had a combined 6 million. 'Strong' i think is an understatement for the Petro.

[@SaltySaiyan98]

WG made this ship so blatantly overpowered out of spite for the community.

[@ainumahtar]

Nah, just to suck up to Russian nationalism, they don't give two shits about the rest of the world.

[@kaltenstein7718]

"has as much penetration as bismarck's 380mm" why again did i buy siegfried?

[@restarting_krnl]

Stalingrad: I am a very strong T10 Battlecruiser Petro: I'm cheep Stalingrad: I have great ballistics and OP shell velocity Petro: I'm cheep Stalingrad: I have great ammunition performance and improved pen angles, plus it's 305mm petro: I'm cheep Stalingrad: (furious) I have high AF healthpool petro: I'm cheep Stalingrad: DAFUQ DO YOU WANT??? petro: I don't cost any steel

[@H4FF]

I was playing my newly acquired Thunderer the other day, and I bounced every single shot off a Petropavlovsk who was giving me (what I thought should be) a little too much broadside. A more angled Yamato took 3 pens, of course. This ship is a disgrace... I'm starting to consider moving back to WoT, that game may be less broken in its current state actually. Edit: Are we just not going to call this ship Overpowered as fuck now? Because it definitely is.

[@ronchabale]

Ludicrous the way WG continues to introduce super overpowered Soviet paper ships

[@EvoraGT430]

It's why I uninstalled.

[@drskk4652]

Yeah I like playing World of *(cough)* Russian *(cough)* Warships myself. No Stalin wait, I don’t want to go to gulag...

[@dinjoe828]

Waiting for the AA mounts HP nerf.

[@fantomas2574]

Ah ..every time I feel the urge to reinstall WoWS I just watch a recent Flamu Video to get ride of it. Works like a charm. Thank you Flamu.

[@r.awilliams9815]

"But look, it has a terrible turning circle radius!" Yeah, no. They give this ship every possible advantage, and call it balanced because of slightly less than desirable handling. Welcome to The World of Russian Bias.

[@wilhelmmc2]

The very first AP salvo I fired from this ship chunked a not-quite-broadside GK for 12k at 15 km. It's pretty insane.

[@goooooller9353]

This ship is just unnecessary and clearly the most pay to swim scheme ever implemented.

[@randomassdude2734]

@@goooooller9353 heh, you can't exactly blame it on p2w since it is a tech tree ship

[@goooooller9353]

@@randomassdude2734 you can buy doubloons and free XP this ship so it's p2w. There is no legit argument for this ship in it's current form.

[@randomassdude2734]

@@goooooller9353 yeah, but everyone can still get it whenever they want just by going through the tech tree line, so it isn't p2w

[@jyrlan2596]

@@randomassdude2734 it is because the whales will buy dubs to get it early in its broken state, then WG will nerf it a few months later when the f2p get it. They've been doing this for years

[@mrgummibaer2522]

Yeah that is the problem with the paper ships. There is no way they can acutually sail the seas and i am quite sure that the guns would be unsuable after 2 salvos if at all, since you would need so mutch explosives to get the shells to the speeds they are at in game.

[@Aquifilia]

Lmao now looking back, this ship would have been super useful in terms of doing citadel missions for the PR dry-dock event

[@frijin490]

Yea when Flamu says the ship is fun you'll know the ship is just stupidly overpowered compared to other ships.

[@franciscoreveriano2524]

I never knew that the Russian Navy was the greatest ever. Thanks, wargaming!!!

[@iiishinryuiii]

because their ships sit very low on the surface, so nobody could notice them. Russian are very clever ;)

[@JerichoDeath]

@@iiishinryuiii They sit so low because they are constantly taking on water due to lack of maintenance caused by all the free vodka.

[@johnnyenglish583]

Remember those good old days when we thought that ships like the Stalingrad were OP? 😁

[@Gorillazilla93]

I rmember seeing a Kronstadt for the first time and thinking "what the sweet mother of christ is this OP mother fucker?" while it pounded the shit out of my NC. "A cruiser with 70k hp and strong armour? WTF is this bullshit, a joke?".

[@さもさもさもあ]

And nerf IJN AP DB because of too effective. WG released higher DMG AP DB with heal.

[@repaleonhalo9754]

And then I shoot a Drake, Venezia on their broadside with Ibuki,, shatters and overpens

[@davidrobinson4553]

Balance in World of Warships went the way of the Dodo just like reality and honesty. Keep telling it like it is Flamu 👍👍

[@joshuarickwood3214]

it is truly a wonder how nations with such rich, and long naval histories, and overwhelming superiority of the sea, such as the UK, USA, Japan, Italy and France, all had to make choices and compromises in regards to Guns, Armour, and speed, and never were able to get all 3 in a single ship, but the soviets were. Must be that the soviets just knew how to build better ships and had better naval research than the worlds premier naval powers.

[@Terrados1337]

so that's "bad" long range dispersion? Am I playing a different game? :D

[@LiveGoDaYDaYs]

same lvl with bad long range dispersion on kremlin

[@wtpiv6041]

Stealthy Icytail Definitely not. Kremlin had its dispersion neutered and looks like German dispersion from a pre buff FDG at ranges further than 15km. This thing maintains a decent grouping at range that makes the Kremlin jealous.

[@Terrados1337]

@@wtpiv6041 the soviet super yamato does not need any pity

[@IceCornelius]

I think wargaming hate you for you re honest reviews. Thanks for the info.

[@lmaogottem5984]

idk man this ship seems a little weak for a battleship, i think it needs to have more armor, but to balance it out it should have less AA mount health

[@Jtretta]

So IRL; she would have decks that are constantly awash, her barrels would wear out in a few salvos, she probably would be so overweight she would be a submarine and her 360 turret mechanisms would be a boar to maintain. In short, she would be as effective as her dreadnought namesake in Tsushima.

[@blakehoffer2800]

His stats: 92%winrate Avg 5 kills per game

[@perselmokki]

I think there's a reason why real ships don't have so ridiculously low freeboards: They want to be usable even when sea isn't that calm. I'd imagine this design would've been stupidly limited in real life in ways the game just doesn't model.

[@crazycar4015]

This cruiser is gonna totally violate the new American BBs. To be fair though, anything is gonna roll over the BBs.

[@bluemountain4181]

The new American BBs are just food for the subs

[@brandondaway1]

I cant see anyone grinding that line. Actually I can but unless you're a masochist your not playing those ships.

[@ShawFujikawa]

Petropavlovsk's ability to wreck Vermonts 1v1 probably isn't anything special compared to other cruisers. If anything she'd be kind of bad at it considering her HE DPM is low.

[@LiveErrors]

Kitakami Vs Vermont

[@brandondaway1]

@@ShawFujikawa ice breaker that prevents cits through the bow. Any other ship would be dead 1v1 cause they cant bow bounce 457.

[@anubhavdassarma7230]

Petroplavolsk: I'm here Me: what's the point of hindenburg again? German sighs Ok let's get serious, the Hindenburg was supposed to have the gimmick of the highest AP Alpha dmg but Petro has taken that role too, and with the other nations I don't see the point of hindenburg anymore. It's faster, more tanky, has better guns, 360° turrets and has great AA Why?????

[@RBannwart71]

TYVM, always enjoy ur reviews. I am looking forward to seeing Greyhound, will come this year

[@ProbublyBeni]

2 Stacks of this freeboard for Goliath? HA I take 5 of it for Vermont's freeboard.

[@swenquin]

Ive stopped playing this game as a regular for some time now. And time and again Wargaming dissapoints me by creating these overpowered ships that make no sense what so ever. There is no balance in this game. Its damn sad.

[@swisstraeng]

I just take my secondary GK and that's it.

[@jyrlan2596]

@@swisstraeng same. I play for memes now, not stats

[@HMSPrinceofWales]

Wasn't the Venecia with its SAP concidered to be a "counter" to the Stalingrads 50mm deck armor? WG allways said they didn't nerf the Venezia because it excels with cariers. I feel like I'm onto somthing here.

[@sobolanul82]

WG made Russian tanks in WOT a lot of them overpowered and now I see the same madness in WOWS. A lot of vodka is drinked in WG balance offices.

[@reganmorben9248]

I know I'm a child, but I can't help snickering when Flamu says "Deck Armor".

[@MohdArif-pl3sy]

WG: give me your free XP for limited time OP ship

[@blackdragoon6659]

I am a cruiser player, I bought Petropavlovsk yesterday, I just citadelled Vladovstok It's so fun to play

[@dot-tt3mn]

I feel like more than half of the AP volleys in this video were citadels.

[@andimayer651]

This ship needs a big buff in the current state i guess, maybe 200k HP, 20km torps, or some 30km rockets?

[@matiscouillard1618]

I would suggest cruise missile.

[@coralski9373]

Noticed now.. because of the absurdly low freeboard, it's going to be hard for the new AP rocket planes (the ones that everyone hated on because of their damage pot) to punish, unlike ships such as DM and Stalingrad (t10 cruisers with the most similar playstyles).

[@codyshann]

Gamers: There's no way a rear main turret can make a 360 deg turn in any warship. - WG: Hold my beer.

[@leftcoaster67]

Flamu is Wargaming kicking you off media chats? Just because you're honest and give accurate reviews? Keep fighting the good fight! When Jingles says there's drama, I am like what???

[@imjashingyou3461]

I would love to see someone in real life make a 8.7 inch gun that can punch through BB armor at normal battle ranges. This gun caliber is designed to defeat cruiser armor in real life. Even the exceptional 12 inch guns on the Alaska with the Super Heavy AP only had the punching power of a 14 inch dreadnought gun. And the KGVs (historically best protected ship) would be able to bounce that gun at long to medium ranges.

[@wtpiv6041]

I was on the Budyonny when those containers dropped for the unsinkable sam camo. I ended up getting chappy for free from it. But now I’ll have to grind Budyonny a bit to try and grab Petro. But at least that I means I have something lower tier to play in for a bit.

[@arbCannons3395]

i honestly cant believe youre still playing this game. gotta hand it to you for the commitment

[@JainZar1]

"The AP then, the AP is in a simple word: Magical." -> Read: Complete BS.

[@LuckDragonProxies]

Magical? All I saw was 4k hits on weird angles that dont do crap with selective clips. I own the ship and as an above average player this ship is worse than moskva in all aspects.

[@malovent538]

@@LuckDragonProxies u mean ur shit?

[@Kuolonen]

@@LuckDragonProxies Can't say I've ever citadelled Stalingrand in my moskva at this angle: 1:20

[@eggyolknyc]

Other nations never did figure out the magical power of Putinium powder charges.

[@sergarlantyrell7847]

Like the combo of super-high velocity, no drag, insane penetration, improved pen angles AND short fuse times/low thresholds... Is just too powerful! Most other ships get improved pen angles by way as compensation for them being lacking in other areas.

[@barbarrrossa5730]

Man, should I really grind for it? Last time when I finally got Venezia, WG nerfed it 2 weeks later. On the other hand, Russian ship, so no nerf coming 😎

[@dinjoe828]

Don't worry, the AA mounts HP nerf won't be that bad.

[@kevinreed-jones3179]

WG will nerf the sigma of 0,0005%, so she will be balanced.

[@ShawFujikawa]

Kremlin had its accuracy nerfed twice. So I guess now we have to rely on the Scotsman's fallacy that that's not a _real_ nerf, oh no.

[@derek96720]

@@ShawFujikawa I mean, statistics say it isn't a real nerf. If it was majorly over-performing before and now it's only over-performing, is it really a nerf?

[@cboelcke694]

I have it and it is fine, and is very good at its specific role, but compared to the Moskva or the Nevsky I would put this one at the bottom of the list. Both ships are far more versatile than the Petro, as they both have really good HE (unlike the horrid stuff on the Petro), long lasting radar, AP that punishes cruisers even at range, the ability to play at range due to their dispersion/innate range (especially with Moskva Leg Mod), and Moskva is still the tankiest cruiser at Tier X other than maybe Stalingrad. Petro is really good if you know how to position, as the ship needs to get closer to fully utilize its advantages, cries if a BB angles against it, and you still need to account for your own angling as while it has the best protection of any Soviet CA broadside it isn't something like the Kremlin where you are mostly unpunishable. Petro is a fun ship but I honestly find her contemporaries within the same tech tree to be more comfortable and impactful on a match.

[@steeltrap3800]

In other words, it's another utterly fantastical load of Soviet BS from WG's inexhaustible supply of same. Yawn, what a surprise. Then consider what's being offered for the new USN BB line. I suspect this thing would 1v1 any of those and laugh. Don't know why anyone continues to reward WG for the ludicrous garbage this game is throwing up at them.

[@ainumahtar]

Considering the new US BB's accuracy makes German BB accuracy in wows look good, this ship would probably dumpster them HARD.

[@Noodle5858]

Can we all just see this game as what it is? A retired Soviet admiral's wet dream. How can they take features out of other nations' lines and add them to the already stacked Russian line? It's an all you can eat buffet of broken mechanics. It has all the features that matter when it comes to getting credits and winning. Des Moines has a statistically higher DMP but that doesn't matter when effectively most of the shells are missing or still in the air when you can see them coming from miles away.

[@711jastin]

8:51 Wows today, USSR is the supreme nation, only USSR can defeat itself.

[@postwar142]

Watching you sit there full broadside, dead in the water citadeling that ship and others in the begining, I've never felt genuinely sad for the enemy.

[@giannislenos3377]

Why does everyone turn broadside when you aim at them ? Some kind of event that give doublons?

[@iiishinryuiii]

Because they see the Petropavlovsk so they try to flee ^^

[@matthewblomstrom4190]

*casually destroyers all of the main guns on a Jean Bart*

[@billwales4861]

I now follow the strategy of firing on Russian ships at any range, even if i'm point blank to another nation's ships (secondaries on close until a Russian gets in range). I feel they are the equivalent of 2 tiers higher than shown, so more of a threat. Maybe the dev's would be sent, by Putin, to Siberia if russian ships weren't the best. My 16" BB put 23 hits on a Stalingrad at various angles and ranges and it still wasn't halfway killed ( 9 shell bounces ?), a bunch of over pens and few in between. Again, the game looks good but realism is just not there.

[@JanKowalski-si6sm]

she gots Hindy concealment or vice versa. otherwise WG is spits in our face and says it's raining

[@bikezone8099]

Petropavlovsk: Exists Me: *Cries in Moskva*

[@SPIRIT-117]

I usually check in about once a month to see what's new with WOWS and whether or not this game actually deserves to be reinstalled. In the last year I've seen everything from the Pay2Rico to WeeGee silencing the CCs on upcoming test ships, to fun policing most of the German premiums, the new US BBs look like a joke, and PetroBismol is still a complete floating pile of biased bullshit. At this rate I'm thinking I should cut my losses and try to sell my account to some whale before WeeGee kills the game entirely.

[@tramachi7027]

Its weird...How in the world became the US the Naval-dominant world power and not the USSR? Surely these ships were so good the State Party couldnt turn down any of them? Glad WG brings us these totally balanced (and reasnobale) ships that shows us just how strong the Soviet fleet *could* have been :) Also...The Petro looks like it wouldve been sunk by heavy seas the moment it wouldve stepped outside the Black/Baltic Sea...Holy shit I would have *not* wanted to serve on this thing unless Im guaranteed to be in the Baltic/Black Sea. Because one storm and this stupid thing wouldve been on the bottom of the seas

[@joselitostotomas8114]

Hi Flamu, The build you recommended is a DD Hunter build. Useful when you're chasing down a DD. The hydro also defends you against torps.

[@doodarr1600]

Joselito Sto Tomas I think he knows that. Also it’s more multipurpose than that.

[@quatschkopq186]

6:39 That talent also grants a free auto repair when activated? Didn't know that til now

[@m000Theevilcow]

Curious to see those new AP rockets dmg on those super Blyat cruisers

[@matiscouillard1618]

If you think that this is bad...Slava is coming with the rest of the split line that encourage camping in the back

[@wisedragon5757]

Flamu: why this and that on petropavlovsk!? WG: Russian balance of course! XD

[@petiertje]

This ship would take on water if it would be on a lake during a slightly above average breeze...

[@capt.eddyhim9254]

I can answer your lots of questions with one simple sentence: *THIS SHIT NEVER EXIST*

[@davidweber8417]

Balance comrade. Russia dadada!

[@phillewis1749]

I stopped playing recently, got tired with the unnecessary power creep and huge balance issues (i.e. things like this). Basically the game has morphed into WoT. Videos are great Flamu 👍

[@СергейЮров-б6е]

This game is sick because of adding such OP ship with every new release((

[@o0_ANTI_0o]

Jajaja the most supreme BALANS even outbalances the other smaller balans cruisers

[@rathion2853]

What gets me is all the subtle ways that Russian bias gets into the game. For instance the shooting angles, the profile of the ship, the absent superstructure, etc. Things that aren't apparent in the stats but are still key factors to a ship that like all Russian ships get to exploit.

[@TwoCraZyEyes0]

i think people are exaggerating the strength of this ship, its strong and things should probably be addressed. stealth radar and either nerf the 50mm armor or raise the freeboard. this ship really only does good when shooting broadsides, the HE is ass and long range dispsersion is ass

[@Keanu252]

I whaled my way to this ship and it is stupid fun to play, finally a ship that actually punishes potato power armor broadside cruisers instead of just overpen nickel and dime damage and hey. At least its not another HE spammer

[@kona8832]

New ship: Hello i'm a new russian ship :D Other ships: F**k

[@CalebChapman12]

CSB hear you over the guns and shells bouncing

[@Pilvenuga]

Could you do an AA test in training battle with Petropavlovsk vs 2-3 tier X CVs with AA build, like you used to do years ago?

[@OberstStein]

This ship is just crazy. None of the statistics of this ship make any sense.

[@garyjones9023]

Every time there is a thunderstorm, snowstorm or cyclone the forward turrets should flood and be disabled for the rest of that game. Scharnhorst had that problem with the original bow on sea trials and they had to make the bow higher. A cyclone would sink this physics defying ship every time. Does it take 3 Petros to match the freeboard on a single Vermont??? I just can't imagine why anyone would ever suggest possible Soviet bias from WG...

[@Nightmare_52]

nerfed roosters radar range but this 12km is completely fine

[@amirulhusniazman6614]

14:42 did the back turret just go 360? deym

[@bluemountain4181]

All three turrets can do 360s

[@amirulhusniazman6614]

@@bluemountain4181 that's it..im gonna grind this

[@bluemountain4181]

@@amirulhusniazman6614 Glorious decision comrade! I am as well

[@amirulhusniazman6614]

@@b-17gflyingfortress6 😂 already have ... hope they will make the same on Roon..lol

[@frenchylemon2636]

"the AA is quite powerful" *proceeds to shoot down 0 implacable planes*

[@ainumahtar]

Compared to most ships the AA is strong, it's just that AA basically doesn't exist rn.

[@felipev4693]

There's nothing better than destroying the 2 turrets of a JB.

[@aaronreiche8246]

17:50 I think another question you should ask is how the hell does this gun have 150mm more penetration than moskva despite the guns being the EXACT same! I mean yes, the two ships use different shells but how does it make any sense that one has 20% more penetration than the other. It makes it even more confusing when you look at the shell weights. with the petro's shells being significantly heavier than moskva's. this means while pen would be greater at longer ranges, this is not the case with close ranges. why were the iowa's main battery shells designed for again? so why a significantly heavier shell has better performance at close range compared to the lighter shell being fired by the exact same gun is beyond me! it really feels like WG has been pulling numbers out of their arses lately!

[@imjashingyou3461]

I love how wargamming ignores the fact that layered armor in reality is horrible and bad at protecting the ship. And why historically Russians designed for it was because of their inability to manufacture it. I also like how wargamming ignores the historical poor metallurgy of the Soviets that further made thier designs under protected.

[@Chironex_Fleckeri]

Good points here. For most of the other countries, they've designed fun party pieces for each line. They feel fun and add believable variety. But Soviet ships... it's just a fiction and everyone knows it. I wonder if there is some element of ... the p-word here. Is their government hoping to use WoWs as a recruitment tool for their navy? It really makes me wonder. I know for a fact the USN views it as a way to get Zoomers to carry the torch.

[@ApothecaryTerry]

Freeboard = they should make the game more realistic by making it simply sink in any situation which isn't a calm day in the pacific. I don't know if this was even a paper ship but I'm pretty sure the paper would have had better seaworthiness. It should sink if anyone scores a hit on the water within 5km since the wave would flood the thing.