Why The 9.88 100m Performance Is Definitely Fake

[@DadofVoices]

I was there, officiating the horizontals. Timer is a legit timer and mt sac is strong. They have a good coaching staff so until this is really disproved, I say it’s the coaching :)

[@MLGBRANBRAN]

you capper, you have fornite on ur channel😂

[@YSoAggressive]

You can literally put a timer over the video and it’s not 9.88

[@DadofVoices]

I agree, it’s not a true 9.88 but still fast. It’s the coaching

[@joshuaweghorst7601]

Mt. Sac means business… they have an amazing sprint squad. Don’t count them out if they do something amazing even if this is a mess up 🤷🏽‍♂️

[@BadBrucey]

Suuuuure you were. I was there too actually and I ran a 9.5.

[@joeycarter8846]

When I first saw the time this weekend, I too was in disbelief. Looking at the video, clearly the guy on his left false started....but even so Garcia ran a good race, like many of his other races. But 9.88? The timing mechanism must be checked. If everyone's running "faster" than normal that day, even a 1/10 error can mean a PB...and a possible world-leading time. He needs to duplicate the result....and the Mt. SAC system needs to be calibrated.

[@Brave-828]

Terrence Laird as a collegiate last year ran a 9.80. Why are these dudes going full-on Karen over 9.88?

[@willstuart4504]

Wind aided. Plus, that's Terrance LAIRD!! 🔥🔥

[@televisionadstrailers4326]

Not hating, just common sense from people that study track and field for a living. I watched the video, it was a CLEAR false start(by someone else) , not Garcia. Everybody in the male and female 100m race PR by .3-.8sec, times are not accurate

[@YSoAggressive]

Because he didn’t run 9.88, it did not happen. Not to mention the massive jump in improvement from his last time, it would’ve been around a 0.3 sec improvement. Went from a 10.2 runner to a gold medal threat in the Olympics.

[@lilcourtny08]

Because it's not Matthew Boling, they would have wet ther britches if it was him

[@jamesclapp6832]

Not alot going on in April.

[@namesake7139]

We arguing with the clock now.... If that's what the official time was then that's what the official time was. You all know I have watched meat on TV and the clock didn't match up right? Let's not begin to do this in track and field. Anytime one runs a fast time they must follow it up with a fast time anyway so let's give him a chance.

[@416yaadie]

Usain Bolt ran 9.76 out of nowhere in 2008. Many outside of Jamaica said the time was fake and was wondering if the timing system in Jamaica was adequate. 2 weeks later he went to NYC and shut everyone who question if his 9.76 was real by breaking the world record!

[@jermaineayivoh8263]

The difference being that Bolt was already a 19.7 200m sprinter and the 2007 Osaka World Championship Silver medalist in the 200m before he ran that 9.76 in early May of 2008. His coach had only entered him into 2 official 100m races before that infamous 9.76 run, otherwise people would have realised much sooner that he was capable of running well below 10 secs. Anyways Garcias time was put up on the official iaaf top lists website for a couple of days but has as of yesterday been removed again, so now it’s almost guaranteed that his 9.88 was not real, otherwise the iaaf would have had no reason to remove his time from the top times list.

[@416yaadie]

@@jermaineayivoh8263 Michael Johnson ran 19.32 and. PB of 10.08, Warren weir ran 10.02 once but most of the time at his peak ran the 100m at around 10.2-3 but still ran 19.7. I remember it up this day there was even a bigger uproar. I agree with you when you said it was obvious that Bolt was capable of running below 10 base on what he did on the corner in 07 by beaten gay off the corner when gay had a PB at the time of 9.84. Kenny bednarek ran a wind aided 19.49 at JUCO and many question his time. The man was running 10.1 before plus Ferdinand omanyala ran 10.32 in 2020. Are you going to tell me his 9.77 ain't real? That's even a bigger jump than Bolt and Garcia. If he didn't do it against a top field like that many would have questions his time

[@jermaineayivoh8263]

@@416yaadie Well now it’s official, the people that were responsible for taken the times at the meet admitted that they had issues with the timing and that times are considered as “no time”. So Garcia’s 9.88 is now officially considered not to be legit.

[@equinox2713]

Going from 10.01 to 9.88 is totally possible for some one his talent. I hear most hating on the kid, when in case of the perfect storm happens and all things come together..from the start, all running phases, all things are possible. It's possible but don't say it's not possible if you don't have proof that it's not.

[@tahjwilson5475]

He's not the issue. You do realize everyone in that race ran massive pbs? There might be a possibility of the timer being faulty.

[@LearningFast]

He isn’t going from 10.01 to 9.88. He was running something like 10.16. That is a massive and impossible improvement.

[@equinox2713]

@@LearningFast same thing, it may be massive, but it does not mean impossible.

[@LearningFast]

@@equinox2713 it’s impossible. Full stop.

[@joejet8982]

@@LearningFast he ran 6.46 in the 60M why not 9.88 in the 100M? kzbin.info/www/bejne/gp_NdmiDf5aFrq8

[@ATHLETE.X]

Nice video clip you’ve got there from my channel.

[@MrTwinFraser]

At least they credited your video..... oh wait....

[@ATHLETE.X]

@@MrTwinFraser I know right. Try to ruin my business with a copyright strike but then use my video with no credit given. What a load of crap

[@MrTwinFraser]

@@ATHLETE.X one rule for them and another for you. Seems to be the way the modern world is sadly going.

[@owenobaseki8947]

The IAAF facing major backlash because they scratched only the 100 meter times but none of the other events were scratched

[@TheHuskyK9]

That's how I felt when Bromell ran 9.77s last year until he ran 9.76s in Kenya later in the season. So folks are definitely gonna start paying attention to him now in his next race

[@Michael-tg9cc]

Why would you feel that way about an athlete who’s run 9.84 prior to injury?

[@notyouraveragejoe2777]

He also ran 9.80 last year

[@t.s.9656]

I saw the Total Running Production's video boasting about it and I knew it was fake cause the dude that clearly false started wasn't called back which means the block sensors were screwed up. I bet his 6.45 60 yard is Boggs too.

[@ezzzyb7469]

There isnt block sensors 💀

[@ezzzyb7469]

@Baum Squad yea mostly see those used at big meets

[@matthewschoen5746]

Yah I just saw his 6.45. He clearly false started in it and was never called back. I’m not saying he isn’t capable of this 9.88 I just think he needs to duplicate it if he wants anyone to take this seriously.

[@biglilrichard]

the guy who won wasn't even the false start tho

[@BadBrucey]

@@biglilrichard I think the point is if meet organizers can't detect a false start their timing of the race is pretty suspect as well.

[@smoothnubian]

Definitely fake

[@leonaenichol9166]

No matter the wind, if your legs can't handle 10.9 speed, u wont run it Sir. Gordon.

[@ElAye]

I can't recall which track KZbinr said he'd perform on the 9th at the SAC relays, but I went to see him run and he wasn't there for the 100s. At least I didn't see him. 🙁

[@juanitoe.8415]

The game is changing Jr college runners can run fast too

[@sligon00]

I saw on another channel that it was recorded as a non-performance. Probably the officials blew it , and had to disavow the time, but not the race itself.

[@joejet8982]

if the time is disavow, then the race have to be too

[@Michael-tg9cc]

Well it’s been ratified and placed as a season’s best on World Athletics

[@jherb]

Hey guy's I just run into this Jamaican sprinter Jovaun Gillespie video races: 100m: 9.59s, 9.61s _200m: 19.23s any opinion

[@joejet8982]

Can't be the clock of the detractors above of the official clock...or can it?

[@ezzzyb7469]

Y’all gonna make my boy run 9.7 the hate and doubt more fuel to the fire

[@YSoAggressive]

If you ran at the meet, you know this was completely false. Times all screwed across the board.

[@timn4481]

r u guys supposed to be experts?. the screen clock always appears slow or fast. anyone whos watched track knows this. ..it hasnt been ratified.. you want an obvious error then look at Jake Doran's 10.15 aussie u20 record and the -5.6 wind for Abby Steiner's recent 200m..

[@irvingsamsonsmithdeanda9126]

First you give strikes for videos that are not in your channel and clearly are not your copyright, and then you proceed to use AthleteX's video about Garcia's 9.88??... Fraudulent scrap

[@donshields2379]

I'll keep this to remind me. If he continues to run this time. Strange things happen.

[@threeandahalfpercent]

the distance that he is winning his races by maybe one day he will be running that time without controversy

[@giorgiovalenton3135]

Lol these guys are haters. The tone they show is disrespectful. Who hurt you? Lol

[@wilburhoffman5510]

Reproduce. He can run at our trials or for his country if his mother or father is from another country.

[@franciscocasillas569]

Check world athletics today since y’all think it’s fake 🤣🤣🤣

[@charleymoley7612]

Oh I checked it alright...and you know what I saw?

[@JBookGaming]

Y’all r jus hater’s tbh bro ran a 9.88 idk why can’t u accept it

[@Byronplays44]

Because they will never be that fast in their life

[@naamanbenyamin8823]

The time is legit. He ran a 6.45 60m also

[@BadBrucey]

With a massive false start.

[@MELODICMAJIK]

not officially, by what I've seen his best is 6.69.

[@naamanbenyamin8823]

We will see how he does in his next race

[@naamanbenyamin8823]

Guess we will all know if his time was legit , after this weekend at Mt Sac relays

[@wendigo3140]

This commentary is kinda disrespectful

[@cross6588]

Only because that time probably shouldn’t be respected.

[@wendigo3140]

@@cross6588 why not? WA obviously respects it

[@hennesgregory]

@@wendigo3140 they’re crying that it wasn’t posted officially, so now that it is what’s the next excuse? 😂😂😂😂😂

[@charleymoley7612]

@@hennesgregory Check again...

[@joejet8982]

@@cross6588 Can't be the clock of the detractors above of the official clock...or can it?