11:15 -> The outer scale on the cabin altitude selector is not movable. it simply shows the cabin altitude that corresponds with the selected aircraft altitude on the inner scale. For example, when you set the marker to 20k ft aircraft altitude the outer scale shows a corresponding cabin altitude of 6k ft. Very informative and comprehensive tutorial, thumbs up!
@SimulationChannelDeluxe2 ай бұрын
I'm glad you like the video. Yes true, shortly after this tutorial I learned how the scales and aircraft pressurization in general works. Thanks for explaining though :) Cheers
@mikecoffee1007 ай бұрын
A More indepth video is what I needed and there you go this was it Thank You , having me enjoy the 414 even more.
@glennmullis14777 ай бұрын
Thank you for creating this video. I pre-purchased this incredible plane during the beta offering, and I've been actually afraid to load it up. It's far more detailed, advanced and intricate than I first realized after watching videos over the years since it was initially introduced. I appreciate your time in creating this. Thank you so much! I may try to fly it next week after all. 🙂😁
@SimulationChannelDeluxe7 ай бұрын
Glad that my video helped, definitely give this lovely bird a spin :)
@ImpendingJoker7 ай бұрын
If you think this is detailed and intricate, you better pass on the A2A Comanche 250 and the Blacksquare Dukes. This thing isn't even on the same level as those.
@SimulationChannelDeluxe7 ай бұрын
@@ImpendingJoker Hoping that A2A will release more planes, not a big fan of the Comanche personally...
@ImpendingJoker7 ай бұрын
@@SimulationChannelDeluxe Well I am not a huge fan of the Comanche per se' but I am huge fan or realism, and the A2A is bar none the most realistic GA airplane on the market. On the subject of more from A2A, they say they have more in the pipeline but they are notoriously tight lipped around there, so there is no word as to what they are working on or when to expect it to come out. Their Aerostar was supposed to be their first MSFS airplane but they had a gear up landing in the real one they owned and were using for the testing, so when they lost it, they lost the total access they had to the type, so they went with the Comanche 250 instead because they still owned the one that it is based on in real life. This allowed them to record sounds in way that the owner of another airplane would probably not let them do. From my understanding the Aerostar while put on the back burner is still supposed to come but no idea as to when at this point.
@SimulationChannelDeluxe7 ай бұрын
@@ImpendingJoker Yeah A2A's planes are amazing, I owned some in FSX too.Would be great to see them release more of them for MSFS, but indeed there comes very little insight from them. We'll see...
@echobay50407 ай бұрын
Another exceptionally good video. Flying by the numbers and explaining the aircraft systems is great. I look forward to the next one!
@SimulationChannelDeluxe7 ай бұрын
Thanks mate, means a lot to me :)
@HypnoticAbyss4 ай бұрын
My favorite msfs airplane to fly, granted i have not flown many payware aircraft but this one is special to me
@SimulationChannelDeluxe4 ай бұрын
Yes it's awesome :) One of the best GA for sure.
@paulb2677 ай бұрын
Totally enjoyed this very indepth video.
@Despiser253 ай бұрын
I really like this bird, even more on-sale for $20. Thanks for the quality tutorial mate! Im surprised Approach control didn't give you a circle to land on the upwind runway? Its not quite the Comanche but closer than anything else, lol.
@swedishguyflies90774 ай бұрын
Great video. Just got this plane. I would suggest introducing chapter markers in the video so the different parts are more easily accessible.
@SimulationChannelDeluxe4 ай бұрын
Thanks, I'm glad you like the vid :)
@caiquealencar16884 ай бұрын
It seems to be one of the best payware aircraft of all times in MSFS 2020. Extremely detailed, and seems to be pretty fun to fly too. Amazing plane. By the moment it's quite expensive to me, but I'll buy it as soon as possible. Have you flown the FSR500? So good too, I recommend you this one.
@SimulationChannelDeluxe4 ай бұрын
Yes the C414 is definitely a great plane. The FSR500 is on my list, hopefully getting it soon :) Cheers and thanks for watching!
@Kydd0927 ай бұрын
Love your vids, always informative!
@Rikus19784 ай бұрын
The 310 and 414 are very good, although I see that there is a lot of difference between the two in the flight model. The 310 is much more nervous, I don't know if this is the case in reality...
@dengladesmiley54673 ай бұрын
Hello, awesome video. May I please ask you where you for the checklist from? Thanks in advance.
@SimulationChannelDeluxe3 ай бұрын
I'm glad you enjoyed the vid :) This is the checklist I was using: flightsim.to/file/29985/cessna-414-aw-ram-guide-checklist-procedures Cheers!
@Spectre757935 ай бұрын
best module ive purchased so far. PMDG 737800 is next
@b.collar6435 ай бұрын
Hi, great video. When I loaded in with the plane, I can't see the Pilots in the cockpit from the outside. Any thoughts? Cheers
@BerndSchmitt-Martinique7 ай бұрын
... die 414...eines der TOP55 planes im MSFS . Habe mir gerade gestern den Learjet vom gleichen Entwickler zugelegt . Beide haben ein TRAUM-COCKPIT für alle technikbegeisterten Simmer . Bin gespannt, ob du auch den Lerarjet bald mal vorführst ???
@SimulationChannelDeluxe7 ай бұрын
Stimmt, die 414 ist echt top. Den Learjet habe ich noch nicht, steht aber definitiv auf der Liste :)
@Dutchman884 ай бұрын
Der LearJet ist Super 👍 und ein echter Klassiker ✔️
@Rikus19784 ай бұрын
Can you please set in order wich is more realistic? Cessna 310, Cessna 414 or Piston Duke Are there much difference in realism? Thanks!
@SimulationChannelDeluxe4 ай бұрын
I personally only own the 414, but you defo can't go wrong with any of these. The 414 doesn't feature wear & tear / maintanance, so if that's important to you, maybe consider an alternative.
@plaasjapie863 ай бұрын
I purchased it yesterday. Very nice, but my GPS screens won't turn on, all other avionics are on. Avionic bus switch is on. Please help
@SimulationChannelDeluxe3 ай бұрын
Do you use any addon GTN units? Or default
@plaasjapie863 ай бұрын
Have not added or changed any files, default installation @@SimulationChannelDeluxe
@JIMJAMSC5 ай бұрын
Vid made me want to fly the 414 again but she will not start manually or autostart??? Except for a low voltage warning everything appears to be right. Engines just turn over and die. Autostart or on runway they again just die. If I start in air they are both dead. Ideas? Haven't flown since the last big update but before ran great/no issues.
@JIMJAMSC5 ай бұрын
Solution- Setting your fuel before flight using the MSFS method did NOT add fuel to the aircraft. I caught it and using the Ipad? in plane added fuel "both tanks were empty" and both fired right up.
@SimulationChannelDeluxe5 ай бұрын
@@JIMJAMSC Glad to hear you got it sorted :) Enjoy flying her
@bradcfi24 ай бұрын
How to I get the GTN 750 into the C414? I do own the TDS GTN 750.
@SimulationChannelDeluxe4 ай бұрын
The TDS GTN is officially supported. I can't remember now if there was a GPS choice during installation, but there's definitely a way to make it work.
@SimulationChannelDeluxe4 ай бұрын
I just noticed that it's all done in the livery selection in MSFS. There are different liveries for each navigation equipment. In case you still care.
@bradcfi24 ай бұрын
@@SimulationChannelDeluxe Thanks
@cockpitlife7377 ай бұрын
Cool
@SimulationChannelDeluxe7 ай бұрын
Thanks :)
@cockpitlife7377 ай бұрын
Bro next time piper pa 42
@darth_patzer3 ай бұрын
Sadly they never end this plane, so many things are still not working. For example you don't need the magnetos to start the engines. There is a pre-flight turn-around but no state saving and no failure, that doesn't make sense. The plane is always ready to fly. The engines sounds is far too loud. and so other many things...
@Rikus19784 ай бұрын
The 310 and 414 are very good, although I see that there is a lot of difference between the two in the flight model. The 310 is much more nervous, I don't know if this is the case in reality...