Ford EcoBoost Engine

Ford EcoBoost Engine
/ fordeu

[@MicroMacroUniverse]

Best engine for 5 years and counting! good job Ford.

[@tegimaghalashvili2046]

hello, for ecoboost turbo engine super fuel will make damage?

[@orangejjay]

@@tegimaghalashvili2046 What are you even asking?

[@itswais77]

Hahahahaha funny one

[@Davido50]

Yes, excellent engine designs. Fords on Gen2 w/ these GTDI engines. 15yrs in production! More experience than any other major manufacturer. *My '22 Edge ST AWD is excellent. My 3rd Ecoboost equipped SUV or truck* . I'm sold on the innovative design.

[@willie9397]

the 2.0L in my 17 escape is a little engine that can and still with only 8000km on it 9.3l /100km with 4wd I expect to hit around 8.5L soon or may be less and when I need to jump on the highway on ramps or pass someone, no problem at all. love it

[@Davido50]

Fords on Gen2 in GTDI engine design. 15yrs in production! No other major manufacturer has more knowledge of this complex engine design. None. I've owned 3 Ecoboost engines in different trucks & SUVs in the USA & they've been excellent. Durable, powerful & reliable in every way.

[@kenj.8897]

Lol

[@hola8520]

Not what the majority of car garages are saying. Absolute trash engines

[@CANDEEIRO]

Great video! I'm studying about variable valve timing. Thanks.

[@cengeb]

Benz just announced a 2.0L Turbo with over 400HP and almost 400 ft lbs of Torque, most powerful production car 4 cyl so far! With great mpg, that 2.0L is the magic size for most uses..amazing The 2.0L is the most manufactured engine size in the world, from all makers. My VW GTI 2.0L turbo is great, latest edition, has improved upper end cooling, to try and cut down on carbon buildup, so far it's working 79,000 fun miles, not a blip of trouble...always getting 31+ mpg AND got 35.1 recently on a long cruise non stopping, best ever with well over 70,000 miles!! Great stuff, I always use at least 91-93 Octane, min is 91 required by VW for that engine..top tier BP most of teh time as it's the cheapest around here, when away I use WaWa or other brands, never had a problem

[@DanielMartinez-ov6pb]

-[-

[@ELP1125]

My Lincoln had the 2.0 L Ecoboost. Nice peppy engine.

[@mikecsiki22]

My 2022 has one. Im amazed at the power

[@kenj.8897]

You will be amazed the longer you own it .😢 Lol

[@megatronprime3008]

another great idea by ford. Well done.

[@ranchurdhimster4955]

Turbos have been around for decades.

[@johnnylee2803]

Ecoboost,good engine,has(203)p.s.and fuel efficiency

[@kevinleavy8565]

I driven an eco boost 1.0 fiesta very nippy petrol engines longevity wise with the earlier versions had some flaws, but for the size it boost it produces and easy on the fuel. the 1.5 very torquie how ever a 2.0 engine should be a power house! They are a popular manufacturer I had driven fords before they are great but i miss their z tec engines and duratec engines they are great sold engines. The ecoblue engines are nice too. keep up the ICE alive ford! all the best!

[@tnitron9750]

Use top tier fuel only to avoid carbon issues in older eco boost engines. USA has too many crappy fuel stations everywhere. Avoid them at all cost . Ethanol is not your friend either. It has 40% less power than regular petrol. Love your vehicle not the few pennies you are saving at the pump.

[@tnitron9750]

P.S. I love this engine!!!

[@kevinswails7707]

Just curious. I have a 2016. Would you use top tier still?

[@reecechess7170]

Mr 44 Ounce if you live in a country where fuel can be crappy, and you don’t know what’s in the local pumps ALWAYS use top tier fuel :)

[@massivemagoo]

Is 2015 old?

[@mattyfresh9698]

Beautiful..ForDale

[@rocket625]

this engine is pretty good so far

[@markusortmaier7174]

Overall good interessting technology. But please change the 1.0 Ecoboost 3 cylinder to a four cylinder engine. It would run much smoother and needs only 0,2l/100km more fuel than the 3 cylinder engine. VW EA211 1.2 TSI (4 cylinder) do run better than the Ecoboost, with the same fuel consumption.

[@dom3827]

VW has other serious problems.

[@jacquesduplessis8944]

How does a 1.0 Ecoboost engine keep getting 14L per 100km with sedate driving?

[@dom3827]

How? it doesn`t. Something must be seriously wrong. Maybe your driving behaviour?

[@jacquesduplessis8944]

@@dom3827 It has the standard auto box not the PowerShift. I heard it uses more fuel to change the gears due to torque conversion maybe? It was my moms car, they gave it back.

[@dom3827]

@@jacquesduplessis8944 hm..than i dont know. Sorry.

[@Ocastia]

@@jacquesduplessis8944 a torque converter will use a bit more fuel than a Dual Clutch transmission, but 14L is way too much for example an Audi SQ5 (2019) Whit a 2.5L Turbo V6 and torque converter transmission uses around 9-11L of fuel, so that is way too much for a 1L Ecoboost Inline 3 or 4 you should expect 5-8L unless you really floor it. Are you by any chance going by the indicator in the gage cluster? Because if that is set to display the momentarily fuel usage it might display that much when accelerating, otherwise I'd check if the turbocharger or injection system is damaged.

[@epiespinoza4941]

How bout the carbon deposit on the exhaust valve?

[@chris63952]

Thats the problem isn't it. All we can really do is use higher quality fuel, and try to keep gas tank at above quarter tank.

[@captainquinnmillspaugh6019]

Epi Espinoza it’s not the exhaust valve that get carbon deposits, it’s the intake valve(s). With port injection the fuel would clean the intake valve on opening, but now with the fuel being injected directly, the intake valve is forming deposits. This can be rectified with a non-vented oil catch can system.

[@dom3827]

EVERY direct injection engine has this problem. That is not a ford specific problem. VW TFSI engines are most affected by this problem according to german car mechanics.

[@tor2919]

Great engine

[@harvijaysinhgraj5917]

Why in india this engine not used in FORD ECOSPORT ???

[@atharv8180]

It is used in india

[@galactic_4240]

EcoBOOM

[@orangejjay]

Definitely makes for a "more fun driving experience." I love it. Wish you would've kept sales going for CARS in North America. I picked up a Focus ST and it's been my favorite car since buying one brand new. I would've stuck with Ford but all you want to release state-side are SUVs and truck/van-like vehicles. Too much for this millennial. I'm shopping for an Audi or BMW for my next purchase.

[@janbojarski004425]

1:13 ok now I hear some hardcore bullshit. Since when is any turbocharger even working at low end? no matter how small you make it, there is still lag, and in reality, if you compare a turboed engine's power and torque, at the rpm at which the turbo doesn't operate, to the NA version of the same engine, the NA will have higher torque and power, of course that is just the bottom end rpm, but isn't that where you claim to increase the torque by adding a turbo?

[@Ocastia]

The size of the turbo isn't that important (Shure smaller is better because of the lower mass) , however the angle of the fins inside the turbine and compressor are much more important, however yes there will always be a bit of turbo lag, even Whit VTG Turbos (Wich most gasoline Ecoboost engines don't seem to use) however you can reduce the lag by lowering the max RPM increasing the Idle RPM setting the software to accelerate much more aggressive than what it should based on the position of the accelerator and by injecting and igniting fuel when the exit valves are open, and that in combination with the Variable Valve timing and Valve travel does end up making those engines feel very responsive and powerful. And Ford never said that the engine wouldn't have any lag, just that it has minimal lag and increased torque over a Naturally Aspirated engine Whit the same displacement both are correct, and them saying that the turbo is optimized for low end torque isn't wrong either, unlike for example the Nissan GTR wich Takes 7seconds to spool up those massive turbos.

[@orangejjay]

Clearly Jandalf is a keyboard warrior who a) hasn't actually driven an EcoBoost vehicle and b) hasn't kept up with today's turbocharger technology.

[@abrosimovoleg6390]

why no ecoboost 2.0 in Russia(((

[@BigEightiesNewWave]

Putin.

[@danielr.8345]

Eco and boost just don’t go along 😂

[@Jeffwolfenson]

Escape 2020 I have has 5 modes with one being ECO and one Sport

[@halohunter5217]

I wasn't that impressed with my rental Fusion's acceleration but then I learned it was only 1.5L... I still prefer the NA 1.6L in my Fiesta though. Lighter weight and feels more powerful at high RPM.

[@fastfordman1965]

The 1.6 is turbocharged.

[@loyal4theway159]

i have a ford with 2.0 econoost with 40k miles so far so good but long term is questionable

[@fookayou8607]

wow Ford are clever indeed

[@janbojarski004425]

I'd rather drive a car that has 15mpg, will need an oil change every 6k miles and will last 1'000'000 miles rather than having a 1L 200hp ecoturbogreenskyactivhomohalal engine that has longlife oil lasting 24k miles or whatnot and will need a full rebuild after 100'000 miles. But hey, that's just my opinion, (and every other car passionate's). and I don't whine about it on Ford's video because I hate Ford, quite the opposite actually, I always loved Fords, it's just what you guys do with this amazing make right now makes me want to cry, I'm fine with having a hybrid, downsized, or electric as an option, what I don't want is having it forced in without an option of something I would like.

[@Hi-db5cd]

Nah. Got 270k miles on it and still no problems. Prolly best choice I made. I don’t know who you drive but an oil change every 6k miles? A car that makes only 24k miles? U probably money-shift very gear. But I respect the opinion:)z

[@covepac]

FORD ECO BOOOST ENGINE CASTEL

[@chriswakefield2020]

ecoboom

[@youtubecrazy6438]

Sorry, but theres no replacement for displacement... I may as well go for a gm inspired v8 that kicks over to 4 cylinder mode under normal driving conditions. Taxes may cost more but on the bright side it will be nicer and last just as long.

[@hansdietrich83]

Hahaha such an american view. Look at the performance of wrc cars and tell me displacement is most important

[@dom3827]

@@hansdietrich83 i agree. Typical 1960`s america thinking.

[@cengeb]

GM disaster? Remember their horrible 4,6,8 debacle, junk remember when GM took a gasoline engine, and sold it as Diesel in the 80's? GM, all junkers, all the time...Even after $60 BILLION bailout, they close 5 factory in N.A., losers, and making junk, no one wants. V8's are obsolete 2.0L Turbo is the most manufactured engine size by all makers, magic size, smooth, powerful 2.0T close to 400HP in lots of stuff..magic. My VW GTI 2.0T gets 33mpg and has done 35.3 on on cruises, with 76,000 miles on it!!! And gobs of torque and pickup with Neuspeed power module, simple plug and play, increases the boost, by keeping the waste gate closed more, great stuff

[@malykan]

Ani słowa o tym jak bardzo będzie wytrzymały. Dlaczego? Wszyscy znamy odpowiedź 🤣🤣

[@boonah5234]

s 這些東西都不能用的我

[@assistantto007]

Check out ECOBOOM on Facebook.

[@epiespinoza4941]

Is not fuel quality is the engine design

[@cengeb]

Lots of direct injection have carbon buildup, cus the gas is not being sent over the valves to clean them, VW solved it on the latest version of the 2.0t by having more cooling in the head area, and supposedly an extra injector to spray some gas across the valves...I always use top tier rated gas, BP mostly around here is the 93 octane cheapest

[@Mace-1191]

The carbon buildup isn't causing cylinder heads to crack cars catching fire etc

[@foggykudzu394]

It's a great engine and here is a tip for an easy fix of an error code with the 2.7 kzbin.info/www/bejne/qJrVp618hd-Lb6c

[@jamiebudamlanbert172]

Ecoboost engines all : 20-100 l/100km, over 100 l/100km. End report. From Ecoboost database

[@thetruth7633]

This is the biggest screw up Ford made during it's existence, what kind of engineering department comes up with and open deck design with cooling slits between cylinders? All the 1.0 , 1.5 and 1.6 ecoboost at work failed before 80K miles. I had the 1.6 VCT before that, unbreakable, even with the flawed piston nock at TDC. 2.0 N/A engine is the best in MK3, but only in a handfull of countries, based on Mazda L series, also in Volvo V50.

[@acrobaticcripple8176]

Give me a diesel any day. These buggers are incredibly thirsty, and the CO2 emissions? Well! Go well though!

[@NurseryEnterprises]

LIES!!!! Where is the mentioning of the fact that the engine needs to be thrown into the garbage can way earlier than most other engines???

[@hungrynapps]

guaranteed to shut down every 10000km

[@lilpeppa117G]

hungrynapps nope 50,000 strong

[@megatronprime3008]

85 000 k's on mine. HAS NEVER MISSED A BEAT. you must be thinking of a Holden or Chev. They are garbage

[@ipaddeluismi3479]

Much more powerful! hahahahahahhahahh fun to drive! hahahahahhaha

[@dom3827]

you cant afford hahahahaha

[@janbojarski004425]

that feeling when ford itself doesn't know which way the crankshaft rotates in their engines. Shame

[@cengeb]

just like VW 2.0t TSI, German ideas copied by others..and other small engines from German ideas

[@MrEpic6060]

All car companies copy each other. But I haven't heard of Ford copying VWs diesels though :0

[@cengeb]

+MrEpic6060 Diesel, is all GERMAN, guess who invented it all? Germans invent all other copy, been like that in everything for hundreds of years...in engineering, electrical, machinery, science pharma etc..all Pharma came out of German chemical companies, Bayer, BASF,Merck, and others..VW first electronic ignition in mass produced cars, first 4we in mass produced cars, the list is endless. Ford was a big fan of Porsche and others...read the history of the old man Ford...Ford is now what about #4 in the world, as they slide further down, barely staying above GM. Pinto....is what Ford is all about

[@MrEpic6060]

+cengeb and without you being emotional, you would have seen it was a joke about your german diesel scandal. Good luck with that

[@pittwm]

+cengeb Yup. This Ecoboost is basically a BMW N54/55.

[@yusufgta4341]

American police Fords like the Ford Taurus interceptor and Ford utility interceptor use 3.5L V6 Ecoboost twin turbos with 300+BHP. Ford Taurus interceptor has 365BHP and Ford utility interceptor having 300+BHP and Ford Taurus interceptor does 0 to 60(100km/h) in 5.6 seconds with a top speed 150mph(242km/h) and Ford utility interceptor does 0 to 60(100km/h) in 6.4 seconds and top speed 132mph. Its crazy American police Fords are using Ecoboost twin turbos.

[@elevatorman5468]

Piece of junk. My Dad used to have a 2012 fwd ford escape with an ecoboost. It had so many problems. Update 2021:Lol. I was way younger when I made this comment. I don’t know why I made this comment. Ford Escapes actually aren’t that bad.

[@dom3827]

like no company has problems.......

[@megatronprime3008]

They are better than a S#!T box Holden

[@dom3827]

@@megatronprime3008 no. By far tze worst brand at the moment in terms of engine problems and failure is by far the VW group.

[@megatronprime3008]

@@dom3827 Yes they are . they have dominated holden in performance for years. It's a fact . i can put the details up here if you like.

[@adamprice9214]

They have overcome all the teething problems new and upgraded engines/heating systems are fine

[@jaystevens3084]

You used to have great improvements now you're nothing Ford. Such a waste