The Puckle Gun: Repeating Firepower in 1718

[@user-ns3vs3bp3e]

I still think if they’d advertised it as “you can shoot 9 Frenchmen a minute” they’d have sold a lot more

[@justsomedogwithaphone9223]

i'd buy ten!

[@kvakerbillduck9500]

Ten frenchmen?

[@markwebb7320]

@@kvakerbillduck9500 LOL!!

[@Zowson]

*i'll have your entire stock*

[@kritizismmusics9737]

Exactly

[@borealranger9763]

"Ian, fetch the cubegat. There are Turks about."

[@oliverperryman7953]

cubegat hahahaha

[@t17389z]

I need to use cubegat in conversation

[@TatarProductions]

Damn the guy is angry about gallipoli and canakkake

[@dietmarwolf79]

In large British cities now more than necessary!! 😂😂

[@fuggoff5277]

the best Solution if you want to make them running Circles

[@Andrew-sv3ck]

Imagine breaking into someones house to steal their TV and you just see some guy at the top of the stairs with a Puckle gun

[@omkr0122]

'I say old boy! Put those items back there where you pinched em will you?' - Guy with Puckle gun

[@jamescooper7878]

whit square bullets! XD

[@liambird2053]

>Buy musket for home defense >Finally one night I hear a crash >Dawn my powdered wig and petticoat >musket is ready to fire >my home surround sound is also primed and ready to play “the royal hussars” >hit play >”TALLEY HO LADS” >run downstairs and into my living room >two men are carrying my tv >put a baseball sized hole in one >The other attempts to drop my tv and run >”AFFIX BAYONETS GENTLEMEN” >charge after him >Jam my bayonet into his anus as he tries to climb back through a broken window >call police >I have tea ready for them

[@OfficialReckM8]

I SAY, BE YE A CHRISTIAN OR BE YE A DIRTY TURK? SON! FETCH ME MY SQUARE BARREL! I'LL PUT THIS MISERABLE DEVIL OUT OF HIS MISERY! HO!

[@chrisreid5745]

Psh pull out a m1911 and kills the homeowner with ease

[@danielhathaway8042]

We had a gunsmith here in the Pacific Northwest who made several of these after he’s saw one at the Tower of London. He brought them to several of our black powder events. They are a very interesting firearm to shot.

[@billwilson3609]

They had both guns on display at the tower when I was there in December of 1985. Bought a postcard featuring those on my way out and have been using it since then as a bookmark.

[@truenomads1508]

Any chance I can get contact info for said gunsmith if I were looking to commission one or three?

[@barret-xiii]

What amazes me most is that the gun is named after its inventor, yet it looks pretty much exactly as you'd imagine something called a "Puckle Gun" would look.

[@higofyp]

"Is he dead, Jim?" "Yeah that guy's _PUCKLED_ "

[@jalin8039]

So very puckled

[@MadGunny]

There should be a name for that phenomenon, I feel like it happens all the time, where some random unique thing has the most perfect name by chance like that.

[@ganii1804]

literally looks like the word puck

[@halfknight6706]

@@MadGunny Right? How else Is James Earl Toilet gonna get the credit he rightly deserves?

[@lindybeige]

It looks like something from a century later.

[@lewiscaine8330]

Lindybeige on Forgotten Weapons, a dream come true. Beige lives matter.

[@bobveinne2439]

I am quite late to the comment if I must say myself, but it's nice to see you on other videos.

[@crabbit8346]

@@bobveinne2439 Yes

[@Spookspek]

There's even something 40k-futuristic about engraving a rhyme on it.

[@crabbit8346]

@@Spookspek No aquila tho,

[@crossed6577]

10:42 BFG division beat drops

[@colek988]

I came here from that video

[@cianbarry9207]

I just came from that video

[@williamhayes2479]

I came here from that video

[@shool2103]

I came here from that video

[@Ahmad-oi9cu]

I came here from that video

[@frankconrad8561]

Man, the craftsmanship that goes into these pieces just blows my mind considering the era its coming from. It looks immaculate!

[@terryjacob8169]

Eighteenth century English gunsmiths were highly regarded craftsmen.

[@DasSeltsameExemplar]

In musket era the only way to get multi shot gun, is to have double barreled musket with 2 flintlocks. Ofc if you wanna achieve multi shot in non complicated way

[@_munkykok_]

You should have seen Jesus

[@planethopper335]

Is this Puckle gun an actual gun manufactured in the 1700s or a modern copy?????

[@6thmichcav262]

@@planethopper335 4:50 he explains it is part original and part reproduction.

[@jackp8583]

I had no idea flintlock tech reached this degree of sophistication. That's real life steampunk!

[@thexbriannova]

And before the usual steampunk time period too...

[@kabob0077]

Look up the Ferguson Rifle and the Belton Flintlock.

[@nooneshome8746]

Clock punk to be exact.

[@PsychadelicoDuck]

Take a look at his video on the "Collier Repeating Flintlock Revolvers". A century later, handheld, surprisingly similar, and the inspiration for the early-modern revolver.

[@tysontitus3332]

Should be called the steam puckle gun

[@smugly6793]

“Hey, you know cannons? “ “Yeah?” “Ok and you know revolvers?” “Yeah.” “Ok, so hold that image in your mind, but get ready to spin it....”

[@許進曾]

Well we got revolver cannon like the M39 it's not to far fetch. That monster are use on jets and fire about 1000 20mm rounds per minute.

[@mweston25]

Smugly this pre dates revolvers by 120 years.

[@FatGreasyMeat]

@@許進曾 your English is Terrible 😂

[@許進曾]

@Jackie Tearie sorry English is not my first language. Could you please tell me which part need fix.

[@Fernando-sd6xt]

@@許進曾 Don't worry, we can understand you well. With practice you'll become perfect. I've certainly seen worse English from native speakers, to the point that I couldn't understand them. If it helps, a grammatically better way to say what you said would be: Well we have* got revolver cannons* like the M39, so it's not too* far fetched*. -That- Those* monsters* are used* on jets and fire about 1000 20mm rounds per minute.

[@coaxill4059]

Ottomans: "Why would you do this?" Puckle: "Because puck you!"

[@thog7653]

Phenian Oliver “Because puck you thats why!”

[@cosmicraysshotsintothelight]

He probably called the square 'bullets' "pucks". Maybe that is where the term originated. :-) Puck you, TURKey!

[@ErTunga209]

Still hurts I presume :D

[@cosmicraysshotsintothelight]

@The Defender What's your problem? You can puck right the puck off, puckhead.

[@cosmicraysshotsintothelight]

@Piss Muffin She would always say "Don't!... Stop!... Don't!... Stop!... I could never tell what she puckin meant. Don't Stop or Don't stop. It is really pucking confusing. Naaahhh... I knew what she meant.

[@MobyTheLion]

"they have square bullets. SQUARE BULLETS"

[@tiago4158]

i thought he was sarcastic, specially because he was looking so serious when saying it. I kept laughing and laughing and he didnt say that it was a joke which made it even funnier smh

[@KptKritical]

Ever seen the hexagonal cannons? They're pretty sweet and a tech marvel for their time

[@klad2860]

i have found you

[@MobyTheLion]

@@klad2860 NOOOOOOOO

[@voiceofreason1208]

They hurt more. 😂😂

[@brandowag3]

There are approximately seven features that are beyond it's time by many decades.

[@morganpriest7726]

Namely the fact that it has numerous rounds but without the several barrels and it’s severe weight

[@CruelestChris]

@@morganpriest7726 We have examples of matchlock revolving rifles with a single barrel dating back to at least the 15th century, that's not advanced at all.

[@morganpriest7726]

CruelestChris 15th century?!

[@CruelestChris]

@@morganpriest7726 Yeah, the cylinder is a very early firearm innovation, it just wasn't really popular prior to the invention of the percussion cap because of a phenomenon called "row ignition" where the spark from the flash pan sets off more than one chamber at once.

[@Nyx_2142]

@@CruelestChris "row ignition" was an issue even in the American Civil War with some of their revolving rifles. Though the term used then was "chain fire."

[@aghaabbas6845]

When the Navy turned him down he should've started selling these to the Ottoman pirates

[@MB-yk1qk]

@daichai He could have become a pirate himself, killing two birds withe one stone!

[@dannya1854]

If the Navies wouldn't even buy it, no chance in hell pirates are gonna buy it even if they worked for the Sultan himself.

[@eusuntIsaac]

He probably didn't like the Ottomans or even muslims that much, which is why he designed the gun that way.

[@Jackerlus1]

Probably would have been chucked in the Tower of London for his troubles

[@stukablyat6266]

I just discovered that he did ottomans had used them against Emirate of nejd

[@skeltonslay8er781]

“Hey, you know how cannons suck?” “Yeah, you can only fire them once before needing to reload” “Yeah, but what if we just put like six mini cannons together, and made em spin” “Genius dude”

[@marcpomaville9429]

"we gonna buy these and revolutionize warfare?" "No."

[@TheAsdffaaa]

@@marcpomaville9429 a thousand years later: Gau8 avenger

[@jonathanoriley8260]

@@TheAsdffaaa *_BRRRRRT_*

[@EllAntares]

@@TheAsdffaaa less than 300

[@9.5.9.5]

@@TheAsdffaaa math 100

[@Dave_tda18]

Hungarians and Serbs with glowing eyes: -*I WILL TAKE YOUR ENTIRE STOCK*

[@mehmeterenozulku1221]

Greeks too

[@guydives1246]

@@mehmeterenozulku1221 pretty much all of europe*

[@thehasslon633]

„Of square Bulletin“

[@Tom-2142]

@Bozkurt postuna bürünmüş yobaz AraB devesi uh, Hungarians wouldn’t need Austrians to force them to fight Turks, Turks occupied most of their country, they were fine with killing them.

[@Tom-2142]

@Bozkurt postuna bürünmüş yobaz AraB devesi Yeah? Tell me then, let’s see what you have to say.

[@9DarthHideous1]

Dude, as a 3D artist, this channel is a godsend. The closeups and the description of the firing mechanism is *excellent* reference material.

[@DaClean]

Nice

[@jackflannigan5749]

Yes

[@bretdouglas9407]

You can make cool weapons for arma3

[@uiopuiop3472]

Nice, now you can make cool weapons for arma3

[@rickschuman2926]

As a 3D artist, I wonder if you could render a demonstration of the Puckle in action.

[@PW.6060]

That's actually a genius design for the time! Basically a giant revolver.

[@anzaca1]

Genius? He made it capable of firing square bullets. Which cannot be rifled.

[@Beefyrulz]

Hey this comment is 2 years old, but what if Revolvers are actually just smaller Puckle guns?

[@onsesejoo2605]

@@Beefyrulz This reminds of the Russian/Soviet Nagant M 1895 where the cylinder moves forward to seal the chambers and which used the unique cartridge where the case extends over the bullet.

[@Michael-zj3cn]

Don't be mean op is a boomer

[@paulleach3612]

@@anzaca1 Square bullets were for the (ahem) heathens.

[@oneeco]

The words on the back of the gun is the most badass design choice I've seen. Bioshock-like almost.

[@IndigoAlkali]

"Defending King George, your country and laws Is defending your selves and Protestant cause." I agree, with an engraving like that I could totally see it featured in Bioshock Infinite.

[@skeltonslay8er781]

Imagine this thing as a gun in bio shock 2.

[@greenaum]

@@skeltonslay8er781 You'd need to be a Big Daddy to carry it. 9 rounds a minute, though, you can melee faster than that. Probably rocket spears or anything from the grenade launcher would be more use against pirate skiffs, and quicker to fire. Still that's the 1960s. Maybe the Puckle Gun will turn up in Bioshock 4. You'd fight people infected with mutated Bubonic Plague that gives them the ability to launch bees and shoot lightning from their fingers. At the end, you have to start the Great Fire Of London in a bakery, to wipe the plague out.

[@user-vgrau]

@@greenaum main character of Bioshock 2 is literally a Big Daddy

[@dennisholt7253]

Engravings have no tactical advantage

[@lancejensen9750]

Crazy how the chambers look like hollowpoint pistol bullets. It really makes the whole "cylinder" look like a speedloader

[@Google_Does_Evil_Now]

"Think how many soldiers you can buy for the price of one of these guns" was probably one of the reasons they didn't go with it. It looks like a beautiful telescope.

[@許進曾]

He should add a sniper scope on it so it can be use as a small sniper cannon.

[@battleoid2411]

@@許進曾 this is in the early 1700s. Scopes were not really a thing yet

[@alimertc]

@@danielaramburo7648 Or even a pistol type, It could be very usefull in close quarters. Just hold it in the general direction and than pu-pu-pum. It could have make those "line up"'s obsolete, where people would be rushing to get close in open fields. That would be interesting.

[@thomasvandevelde8157]

@T A euhm, sadly enough, yes that was precisely the logic in those days. Soldiers in the British Army held maybe 2 sets of practice shooting (and that was volley fire) a year, if they had any shooting experience at all before being sent to the battlefield. This was because the gunpowder, together with the musket, was seen as an accessory to the pike/bayonet-formation. It was only with the reforms of Frederick the Great the firearms horrible capacity was fully unleashed: under his reform, Prussian musketeers were drilled relentlessly, and mercilessly, to the point of perfection. A standard company of Prussian line-infantry was expected to fire AT LEAST 3 volleys a minute, and this was for greenhorns. Veterans got off up to 5 volleys a minute, which is... Completely insane, if you ask me, but it shows how much changed between 1718 and 1788. In Frederick the Great´s opinion the musket was clearly the deadliest weapon of all, capable of mowing down everything, from bears to armoured men, including their horses. So it was only to obvious to change the primary weapon from bayonet/pike to musket, and the bayonet-charge to finish off the job (if needed at all). And by 1798 a small Corsican general applied the same logic to the most powerful firearm he could find: Cannon, arranged into batteries instead of singular, fired by a battery commander/observer, firing volleys of death over many battlefields. I believe this Corsican/French general lost only 8 out of 70 battles? :-)

[@Oblithian]

just think of what a lovely grenade launcher this would make.

[@Liesmith424]

I have a concealed-carry Puckle Gun for self defense.

[@JackClockerinos]

Ban assault Puckle guns!

[@davidphillips2249]

dueling pistols

[@dndboy13]

sex machine dont you have an combination aztec pyramid/trucker bar to go to.

[@modelmagician3743]

Liesmith Lol i where mine in my trousers

[@modelmagician3743]

Liesmith Lol

[@chrisball3778]

Puckle's design seems a sound one. No doubt it was an extremely expensive weapon for the time, but his suggested uses as an anti-piracy naval weapon and for the defence of strategic positions like bridges sound like sensible and well-informed applications of the technology he developed. One possible factor in the commercial failure of the Puckle Gun that I've not seen discussed is that he was very unlucky in the historical moment he chose to begin promoting it. 1720 in England saw the peak of the 'South Sea Bubble' and its associated stock mania, during which assorted chancers and charlatans took advantage of an explosion of popular interest in the stock market to encourage people to buy into numerous crank business ideas, with the predictable results of the 'bubble' eventually bursting and thousands of people losing huge amounts of money. The landmark non-fiction classic 'Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds' by Charles McKay (first published in 1841) contains a direct reference to the Puckle Gun being considered part of the 1720 Stock Mania- it briefly describes a series of satirical 'bubble' playing cards made at the time, including the following passage, which itself quotes one of the cards: "One of the most famous bubbles was 'Puckle's Machine Company, 'for discharging round and square cannon balls and bullets, and making a total revolution in the art of war.' It's pretensions to public favour were thus summed up in the eight of spades: "A rare invention to destroy the crowd Of fools at home instead of fools abroad Fear not, my friends, this terrible machine They're only wounded who have shares therein." A great many of the businesses promoted during the 1720 South Sea Bubble and stock mania were blatant, outright con jobs. 'Extraordinary Popular Delusions' even describes one that sold shares as "A company for carrying on an undertaking of great advantage, but nobody to know what it is," whose owner apparently sold several thousands of pounds worth of stock and then immediately fled the country. It seems possible that Puckle's gun was widely seen as just another of these scams, blinding many to the advantages of his design. All this leaves me with the impression that had Puckle first attempted to promote his gun at almost any other time in history, he might have had a better chance of being taken seriously. If it weren't for that unfortunate historical coincidence, the revolver might well have become an established weapon of war a hundred years or more before Samuel Colt. It's also noteworthy that Puckle's gun was described as a 'machine' back in the 1720's- whilst it might not match the modern definition of a 'machine gun', it was definitely considered a 'machine gun' at the time of manufacture.

[@hengineer]

that's actually fascinating. I had no idea about that little tidbit.

[@Snagabott]

I will not say that you are necessarily wrong, but remember... he did actually secure funds for his company and managed to manufacture weapons. That may not even have been possible were it _not_ for that mania. And mania or not, the navy _did_ try them and didn't like them. That could be because they were ultra-conservative idiots, that the prototype version they saw had some teething problem that poisoned their minds against the gun or that the test didn't allow for proper training in their use... but it could also be as simple as them first being intrigued, then looking at the price tag and then all simultaneously turning around, going "Ooopsi daisy, would you look at the time!?!"

[@Acorn212]

I need to get a hold of that book, sounds like an interesting read.

[@savagex466-qt1io]

Well said Chris Ball. To me ( what do i know lol ) this seems like a great weapon for the purposes he mention. However id only sold to one man ? Regardless of price, how come this weapon was not popular ? I know the Brits never cared about the price of there huge ships, whats wrong with a expensive new lil cannon ? Im just wondering how come this weapon never took off ?

[@glasslinger]

The gun also had a severe problem with the slightest wind blowing the priming powder away causing a misfire. Many of the old flintlock designs had this flaw. The gun might have been successful if percussion cap firing was available.

[@MrPink-qf1xi]

As a Turk I must say, this is really hilarious and I am kind of honored. Great gun, it looks awesome.

[@eustacebagge5499]

Yep, take pride of the fact that your ancestors were scum of the earth for hundreds of years.

[@_munkykok_]

Kudos to the sense of humor 👍👍

[@stevejohnson6593]

Filthy humans of X region, we have a special for you! - some warlord of every era

[@ComicGladiator]

You're obviously no square. ... Unlike the bullets designed for you :P

[@TheGallantDrake]

@@stevejohnson6593yeah… that’s about how it works.

[@Michael_Smith-Red_No.5]

I believe the Death Star also had a problem with small craft, as its Turbo Lasers were too slow to track them. Perhaps some of these might've helped. Have a nice holliday, in whatever form it comes.

[@Michael_Smith-Red_No.5]

They did, but Lord Vader was told that the rebel fighters were too fast for the Turbo Lasers to track. It was an attempt at a comparative joke, which was apparently too slow to evade Turbo Lasers.

[@BurnTheNuance]

FlymanMS How'd that work out?

[@BurnTheNuance]

Bunnyshooter 223 Ha?

[@politedog4959]

BurnThePope Tarkin specifically ordered all TIE fighters to stay in the docks. Just your clichee villain having a sudden rush of shit to the brain.

[@manictiger]

Funny how an Abrams of today can move a turret so fast that it'll break your leg if you're standing on the tank, but the turbo lasers can't track an X-wing. Plasma injected lasers (or something like that) that can destroy an entire planet? Check. Faster-than-light travel? Easy-peasy. Basic hydraulic motor technology? Impossible!

[@LumpMietek1]

this thing is remarkable, looks like straight out of some steampunk fantasy but it actually was a thing.

[@Catcrumbs]

It even pre-dates peak steam by some time.

[@rileystanley7402]

Ya...

[@Mr-Trox]

You could throw this into a steampunk setting and it wouldn't look out of place. Maybe make it the equivalent of a MK. 19 though, since the typical Steampunk era has Maxims and Gatling guns.

[@SHARDK2]

"9 rounds per minute." Meanwhile in Assassin's Creed Rogue: _BRRRRRRRTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT_

[@theowlfromduolingo7982]

Ishi 123 A10 today: *BRRRRRRT BRRRRRT BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRTTTT BRRRRRRRRRRRRRTTT BRRRRRRRTTTTT BRRRRR BRRRRR*

[@oj3774]

Assassins: no you cant just betray us and do what you think is right Shay: haha puckle gun go brrrrrrrttt

[@goofytycooner5519]

The Puckle gun is a primitive semi automatic weapon. Assassin's creed Rogue: Did you say *M134?*

[@thetoniotchannel1345]

@@oj3774 shay: haha luck I manufacture myself

[@goonigoogoo5868]

your comment is stupid and childish

[@simhthmss]

"The second ammendment only applies to weapons from that era" ok then, I will have 20 puckle guns.

[@kfl611]

one for the right hand and one for the left hand, and the extras for the other sides of the ship and home.....

[@willfakaroni5808]

Good luck trying to reload them

[@someguy3766]

There are two representations of this gun in media that I am aware of, both video games: Empire Total War and Assassin's Creed Rogue. In both games this thing essentially functions as a slow-firing low capacity machine gun. In reality, it seems to be more of a repeating swivel gun, that has to be manually reset after every shot. Still way ahead of its time in terms of capability but definitely not a pew pew machine. :P

[@17Scumdog]

The puckel guns on Empire! So many Mughals slain! Takes me back

[@lordwintertown8284]

While it say 1 year idk how long for it could be nearly 2 years old but there's also now the game Atlas which sees this weapon as a placable weapon on shoreline fortifications (just not vessels yet). Hm the ones in Rogue seem to hVe been sped up an had larger cartridges instead of 9 you could have up to 24 shells.

[@sweetpurple8812]

@@lordwintertown8284 i could see them having innovated on the design and made better guns if they had adopted them and seen success

[@BigWheel.]

It's like an auto loader on a tank, but in field peice form then?

[@DatBoiOrly]

also in assassins creed IV blackflag

[@FredDude27]

I don't know much about production methods of the time, but this thing looks like it was very expensive to produce in 1718..Or even 1818 for that matter.

[@CarnalKid]

Fredrik Häll Shit, looks like it'd be expensive to produce even now.

[@rubenskiii]

It was expensive! That's why almost nobody bought it :D The amount of brass...precission made parts, grinding,etc,etc.... This piece of art must have cost atleast "half a ship"

[@pingun96]

Not a cheap gun to make many of, thats for sure. Probably why only a duke bought it, big, fancy, expensive. Nobility in a nutshell.

[@jeanpablodelizdavila3456]

Ruben de Jong fun fact: the gun was hard to aim, had an poor flintlock mechanism and too to long to shoot

[@boxhawk5070]

It sure looks badass though!

[@banymany7444]

"How big do you want the revolver?" "Yes..."

[@antonstefanov2146]

Yes

[@trit2580]

Big brass

[@dimsum3329]

Y e s Umm..okay what type of bullets? S q u a r e

[@JoeStracke]

Never get tired of seeing this uninspired wit on every single KZbin video.

[@theowlfromduolingo7982]

BanyMany looks quite handy to me

[@milangrala6990]

10:10 The clip that everybody remember

[@somerandomguy711]

LMAO 🤣🤣

[@Eternal_light85]

Turk rounds and healthy friendly rounds

[@eloryosnak4100]

I'm a Turk. I heard the first part of this and just went: "ah. Us again."

[@Turi6070]

Yine biz :3

[@Macorian]

Well, it was mostly people from the Maghreb. Now, let's not forget that the British Empire itself was largely built upon piracy.

[@theenglishman9596]

@@Macorian The British empire was largely quite benevolent unlike the Turkish rulers

[@Sundara229]

@@theenglishman9596 To whom? Did you already forgot the fate of india? That was one major fuck up.

[@Oblithian]

hahahaha

[@karlkruger7310]

I would imagine ,if the magazine was loaded, the gun would balance perfectly.

[@brendanhere.6400]

Yeah, Karl. I contemplated the same, as one fires, one "lifts" the shoulder just a tad and compensates.

[@dosmundos3830]

as you fire from a ship and your gun gets lighter it would self aim at your target if it's still coming closer lol

[@andrewdesroches8669]

Ya good observation i agree

[@GeoFry3]

If it was loaded it would probably balance better.

[@tolkienfan4815]

👍

[@HerrHeltcel]

Fantastic point.

[@MoabYoda]

I was thinking the same thing when he showed it was front heavy. I instantly realized it was balanced when loaded.

[@DavidThomas-sv1tk]

And like early airplanes (well, all airplanes, but it's more obvious in) 2-passenger tandem planes: you put the variable load (the passenger) right under the support. The lead ball/shot in the Puckle would be really close to the pivot point. Perhaps it balances perfectly when half loaded. i.e. a little back heavy when fully loaded and a bit front heavy as we see it here, unloaded.

[@kaunas888]

Beautifully made...and it looks so modern...more like about 1860 than 1718 in appearance.

[@uber7mm290]

The Puckle Gun is probably balanced with the barrel horizontal, when all nine chambers of the cylinder are loaded with powder and ball.

[@ForgottenWeapons]

Good point.

[@KincadeCeltoSlav]

I HAVE TO KNOW! What is the Inscription say...I read ".....defending yourselves......"

[@ralach]

"Defending king George, your country and laws, is defending your selves and the protestant cause" i think edit: yeah ian reads it out at the beginning of the video (missed it the first time around >< )

[@KincadeCeltoSlav]

ralach I Heard that at the begging, but didn't realize the whole thing was Inscribed around the Rim of the Cylinder! Wow! Thanks Guys!

[@GrumblingGrognard]

yea, they don't make'm like that anymore; esp for military spec. ;-)

[@peterpeterson4800]

Putting a 3 cm big hole into a boat or person every 7 seconds and being able to do that 9 times must have been amazing in 1718. I imagine it would be even better balanced when it is loaded by the way.

[@_munkykok_]

Yupp, plus imagine going for square bullets

[@fireaza]

I imagine that checking the religion of your target before you decide what ammunition you needed to use was a rather awkward exchange... "I say, good sir! By what religion do you place your faith in?" "I do declare that I am Christian, my good fellow!" "By Jove! Jolly good then! T'would appear that I shan't need to change the bore of my repeating Puckle firearm! I say, be a sport and stay right there while'st I rotate the chamber of my repeating Puckle firearm to a fresh projectile! For I plan to shoot at you post-haste!" "My word! That is rather rude of you! Would you not you agree, old bean?"

[@freedomofpeach9790]

BLAM!

[@JRhodesZA]

Died @ "Old Bean" lmao

[@Gottaculat]

Whites get round, brown get square. Seems simple enough to me.

[@DLBBALL]

Goattacular Not all Middle Eastern people are brown. You should know this.

[@TheCaptainSplatter]

More like blam blam blam blam.

[@rablindsay6726]

Everyone gangsta till Britain pulls out the automatic square bullet cannon

[@reinplat]

"A 1718 Puckle gun". "Hey, just what you see, pal."

[@patrickharding4831]

"Hey you can't do that" [After a minute and a half of loading priming lining up bore with barrel and winding it into battery, then aiming]: "Wrong"

[@sweetsour6783]

@@patrickharding4831 LOL

[@KroryykDB]

This was a brilliantly made weapon for the era, this is almost alien technology when compared to what they had.

[@MaartenvanRossemLezingen]

Yeah this thing looks like it's from the 1800s rather than the early 1700s. I wonder if there were any more advanced guns made in between this and the Gatling gun.

[@Taxandrya]

the fafchamps machine gun

[@mrdojob]

This basically uses the very first fully contained cartridges. Bullet, propellant and "primer" all ready to go but not only that, it was mechanised for speed without reloading after every shot. This is basically a revolver without the cylinder but EXACTLY the same concept and a shitload more powerful.

[@brianmiller9365]

It has a cylinder. You swap out cylinders Clint Eastwood style (Pale Rider) instead of reloading the one cylinder when empty. *BGM.41

[@acbradley4024]

No, it wasn't. It was a simplistic weapon even at the time, look up the Kalthoff Repeater for a real marvel.

[@alackofcaring9662]

a breach loading light cannon. in 1720. BRITIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!!!!!

[@AreroniumPlaysL]

k

[@tommcmahon14]

Stephan Kinder 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

[@beachcomber2008]

Spelling.

[@chrismiddleton398]

This is the most beautifully engineered gun I have ever seen. A pleasure to see. "He did his math."

[@_munkykok_]

*Meth

[@deadherron]

Fun fact John Montagu was the earl of sandwich, yep the guy who invented the sandwich 🥪 (what a guy)

[@b226tj]

Wonder if he likes corners *Square bullets intensify*

[@יובלעקיבא-ד6ט]

Well, you gotta spend them gambling earning somehow

[@jeremypearson6852]

I think someone would have invented that eventually

[@elijahsellers3727]

So I wonder why we don't have Montagus for lunch today

[@Nutty31313]

He probably didn't invent it, I've heard accounts of people putting other foods between slices of bread since the Romans, but he probably popularised it and gave it the name.

[@BlarghMeow]

Probably wouldn't be too hard to convert it to fire pickles

[@filmandfirearms]

A pickle Puckle

[@jason60chev]

Aunt Bea's Kerosine Cucumbers!

[@MrGaryGG48]

Now it looks like a very serious, technical discussion went completely off the rails... really, a Puckle Pickle Powered Perpetrator??? ;^)

[@jason127x99]

Gary Goodlund libtards will get their hands on this gun and try to make it fire Dildos rounds in the coming up civil war.

[@theyellowentity9668]

You should have a look at a video we’re this guy used a confetti cannon to make a gun that shoots 3D printed dicks.

[@enzowarren9832]

This is actually my daily carry. It’s perfect for CCW.

[@Poleson]

Is that a puckle gun in your pocket...??

[@Colddirector]

@@Poleson ... Or are you just happy to see me *shoots square load*

[@pauljohnson9445]

Saw one guy in Walmart. He was ankle carrying one.............

[@davidc4983]

1911 ccw carriers be like:

[@b226tj]

For some reason I feel compelled to buy this and a brand new revolver, and show the advantages and disadvantages of older equipment.

[@ownage11445]

Impressive piece of engineering especially for it’s time. I’m sure this would’ve have been a game changer if the British Navy and even the British Army implemented it.

[@_Twink]

Wilhelm Schikard invented the first mechanical binary calculator in 1623. Technology was a lot more advanced then most people give it credit for.

[@amckittrick7951]

​@Abu Hajar Al Bugatti are you saying that British, Swedish, and German tech has always been ahead...because that's simply not true.

[@ComicGladiator]

@@amckittrick7951 It certainly has been for the past 500+ years.

[@amckittrick7951]

@@ComicGladiator yeah, that I'd agree with that

[@Bovrinox]

I can just imagine a 1700's Rambo, wielding one of these in each hand! hahaa

[@sleepinggolem4595]

How the he’ll wold he hold on

[@misterrogerroger5537]

@@sleepinggolem4595 2nd guy would follow him, furiously cranking

[@BlueTeam-John-Fred-Linda-Kelly]

Rambo with a powdered wig... I'm ok with that as long as it's badass.

[@dudeusmaximus6793]

Fascinating. I can't believe they were doing that kind of metalwork that early. It looks like late 19th century. And the thinking behind it is quite advanced for the time. Looks like they might have been a bit more modern than we give credit for.

[@HodokPo-babam]

it's just that the history was changed a little and the dates were shifted. If they had told me that it was the end of the 19th century, then I would have believed it!

[@felautumn9534]

@@justforever96 It's a shock to him because he doesn't know his history.

[@Blox117]

@@justforever96 so only clocks? how did they machine them? with water power?

[@akaroth7542]

@@Blox117 water power and belts, then steam and belts. You'd have a central shaft then the machines could be looped onto it and gear ratio'd down to what was needed. Belt turners from the 20's still do a decent job. Useable for real manufacturing today? No, but they were for back when they were made.

[@MegaCasey09]

Cast steel not machined... there wasn't electricity lol

[@andrewjackson4424]

Either I’m far too high, or this is the most beautiful weapon ever made

[@ddogg14]

nah bro we vibin, its beautiful

[@lumethecrow]

Why not both?

[@mikeytodd7]

Lets put weed in it and light it with the striker and suck it out the barrel. We could get 9 people high per minute.

[@luciano_luna1941]

That would be the Aug

[@rodfast8196]

Don t worry, you re not too high. It is beautiful

[@VictoriaAlfredSmythe]

i have never heard of anything so "what?" as square bullets. that is insane

[@vileindividual]

I was amazed at how it cycles to the next round. What an amazing piece of engineering from the 18th century

[@barrybend7189]

And done by a lawyer no less.

[@DanH34]

Steampu(n)ckle. On a more serious note, I could see these things taking off if percussion caps had been available at the time.

[@GabrielCarvv]

On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note On a more serious note

[@qwerty13380]

@@GabrielCarvv Congradulations, you earned the title of moron.

[@ivanpetrov5255]

The moment I saw those cover plates my thought was "Did he made a system for opening those or is it done by hand?" That is why I love guns - they are always a marvel of human imagination and engineering.

[@vrokhlenko]

If this level of machining was achieved in 1720 - I am speechless.

[@_munkykok_]

It was achieved in 1717 already

[@McLarenMercedes]

The "machining" as in manual craftsmanship itself is impressive. The problem was always going to be mass production and this weapon is way too complex and time-consuming to ever be anything but a rare niche weapon during the 1700's. Here's the main problem: This complex weapon was made by specialist gun smiths and cost a fortune. Why? Because it was all personal, manual labor. The age of industrialism only started in the 1760's and even then it mostly revolved around *textile manufacturing* and spinning machines. Those were powered either by a large water wheel in a river or early steam machines. No, the real industrial revolution was the 2nd Industrial Revolution of the 1870's. You see at this time we saw a very important invention called *machine tooling* and the electric machine. The machine tooling is the "machining" you're thinking about. Mass-produced cheap steel was also very important and there was none before the Bessemere process in the 1860's. Thanks to the electric machine and machine tooling you could now mass-produce previously complex and time-consuming larger and smaller parts with milling and lathe machines. You could also build giant factories (thanks to the cheap steel) anywhere. This is also when the population went from majorly working in agrarian trades (farms, crops etc) and work in industrial production. But there were no milling and lathe machines powered by electric machines in the 1720's. Ergo the Puckle Gun was developed at a time there was no industry and no possibility to mass producing it. Every single complex part had to be cast or manually shaped with manual hand-tools. In short. This was an industrial age design which unfortunately pre-dated the 2nd Industrial Revolution by some 150 years. So no level of "machining" at all.

[@mickles1975]

That is a beautiful machine. Everything should be made from brass if you ask me.

[@BurnTheNuance]

mickeybill We'd have incredibly expensive, structurally unsound buildings. Would be a beautiful, yet incredibly scary world. Sounds intriguing.

[@mickles1975]

Ok not everything. But brass decorations would be nice.

[@bigburd875]

mickeybill how bout we brass plate steel instead of chrome plating it?

[@dave-cj5gb]

+Teddy Roosevelt the steel would corrode quickly because of galvanic corrosion

[@Daliaxez]

steampunk before steampunk was even alive

[@maxwellmortimermontoure7274]

Can't wait for it to be dead again.

[@theusher2893]

Charcoalpunk

[@anonymus5637]

@@theusher2893 Powderpunk

[@stockloc]

@EnglishXnXproud Steam punk was made by Gen X

[@emperorfaiz]

@EnglishXnXproud OK boomer

[@atvheads]

@ 5:30 With the chambers loaded, it probably balance even better.

[@santallum]

Totally !

[@eb1247]

Exactly what I was thinking when he said that

[@TheMrBigShot96]

This is seriously one of the coolest and most interestingly designed guns I've ever seen! And it's over 300 years old!

[@GreggGiles]

The engineering on this is extraordinary for the early 1700s... I kept asking myself if perhaps he really meant early 1800s, it just seems so unreal that such high levels of machining and metals were even in existence in 1718...

[@FullWrath1000]

Amun Ra you mean late 1700s

[@felautumn9534]

@@justforever96 It was only like this in a tiny part of the world. Most peoples were still using swords, even besides their muskets at the time. Flintlocks were one shot pistols, not multi shot. This is incredibly advanced engineering for the time and most things didn't catch up until the 1800's. Watches existed, but they were for the upper echelons of upper class and society so for most people at the time, they didn't exist in society, they existed as a novelty you got to see from the richest and must influential people.

[@Joji-cx5ml]

Look up Jaquet Droz writer automaton.

[@marcpomaville9429]

Dude it was 1719 not 1019

[@sol2544]

You have to admit, it does look elegant. Many other "prototype" or "unused" advanced guns like this looked very bare bones or homemade. This one looks well crafted, with its smoothly operating revolver mechanism, the built in gas seals, and the mechanism snapping down in place once you prepare to fire each shot. Surprised it didnt go far, it definitely has looks to it.

[@_munkykok_]

You just have to imagine other people/companies wanting to sell their stuff instead, or price differences, or any kinds of outside factors. Same as in any other era. => It's not only about what's good, but also about competition, pricing, economic incentives to do other stuff, etc. Let alone corruption, malevolence, politics and so forth... (#ProgressNarrative vs #Reality)

[@lando8913]

Impressive! Beautifully made too. I love how back then people were true craftsmen and really put a lot into everything they made, all by hand of course.

[@evlkenevl2721]

"With a name like Puckle's, it's got to be good!" -Earl of Sandwich

[@MRB1157]

Does anybody remember this from Empire Total War?

[@williamfaulkner346]

yeah

[@Argacyan]

Jawohl

[@RobotGoose]

If you managed to lure your enemies (like cavalry) into the range of them and made all units fire at the same time, they'd absolutely shred anything very fast.

[@Argacyan]

Jimmy De'Souza They were given too short a range to be effective presumably in an attempt to balance the game; unrealistically short if I remember correctly.

[@umjackd]

The game totally gave me the impression that they were more common than they actually were.

[@SeekerNJWC]

At 11:30: "... that EVERYONE knows about, but ..." Apparently everyone but me - never heard of it. Fascinating. Hats off to Mr. Puckle.

[@kingcobra7183]

Puckle Gun? Ah, great choice for *Home Defense*

[@ortuignis3782]

9 rounds a minute?

[@codysing1223]

Only need to shoot it once, they won't know it takes awhile to reload. One look and "I'm out"

[@xmo552]

I'd bust across the room ♂️

[@kingheart9555]

If someone got hit with that size of a round, they would be tomato soup. You would have to scoop them up with a shovel.

[@niklasmolen4753]

@@kingheart9555 It should probably be seen more as a mini cannon.

[@lettuceman306]

Regarding the ad Ian reads at the beginning, "passes" and "places" actually rhymed in the English of the time - they both had the "a" sound "pass" still has today. This also applied to other words, like "plate", "fate", "face", "gate", "late", etc.

[@oliviersavard8676]

Thank you for today's old English lesson, seems like it's just the French a (you pronounce it "hey" in English but in French it's "ha") which would make sense as French was more popular back then in Europe than it is today

[@Gigas0101]

Nowadays you know someone wants to own one of these just so he can yell "get pucked". I love this gun, ugly and beautiful at the same time.

[@kuttinkuddy3905]

puckle gun? it wouldn't make me "puckle" ha ha!

[@bigtime9597]

@@kuttinkuddy3905 Oh puck off!

[@funkydozer]

Ugly is in the eye of the beholder. I think it's nothing less than stunning.

[@teatonaz]

Ugly? Don't see that in any way,... in less you are meaning ugly in it's usage to kill people ?

[@ajeje1996]

The ingenuity behind this design is absolutely incredible. I was gon a joke about how I conceal carry it every day, but man, look at this beauty...

[@TheAcdcninja]

This is so beautifully engineered... It’s amazing to see really well planned and crafted mechanisms regardless of the application.

[@specialagent1868]

It would have been interesting to see this design with percussion cap ignition since it seems like the flint was the major hurdle

[@JohnW-yv6yp]

“The founding fathers could never imagine repeating firearms in 1789.” Sure bro, sure.

[@JohnW-yv6yp]

Mointz Yes it’s ironic, that’s why I had quotes and the sarcastic sure bro, sure. The quote is what anti gunner say.

[@davidc4983]

9 shots a minute versus 6000 from the modern mini gun...

[@JohnW-yv6yp]

@@davidc4983 And citizens who aren’t rich af cannot own miniguns, we’re fighting for the rights to own basic ass semi auto rifles. And that’s not the point, the point is people say all they knew were muskets. If they saw this thing from 80 years earlier, they could predict weapon advancement.

[@davidc4983]

@@JohnW-yv6yp are we talking about the same people who, in their own lifetimes, would pass laws which prohibited loaded firearms in the home due to safety concerns? I'll grant you that the semi auto debate is fuckin retarded, but let's not pretend the founders were opposed to regulations either. I suspect if they thought about what firearms would like like in the future at all, they probably assumed, like the puckle gun, anything too dangerous would also be all but impossible for the common man to attain

[@JohnW-yv6yp]

@@davidc4983 You weren’t allowed to keep a musket loaded if you lived in town because the things were not as safe as modern firearms they could go off. They did not ban any firearms, there were new firearms being developed at the time. The purpose of the 2nd amendment was so that people could fight the government, taking away all infantry type rifles is therefore counter logical.

[@MrRussian19]

"The second amendment never took rapid firing guns into account, all they had were single shot muskets!!" Guns 60 years earlier:.....

[@argon7624]

Yea, but it'd kinda be like acquiring a Bofors cannon today.

[@hunternelson3018]

@@argon7624 everyone should be able to own a bofors gun, if they have the money.

[@tb5884]

@@argon7624 completely legal during the founding Father era

[@yunghambean7774]

@HalibetLector not doubting, but is there a link to this cause that’s funny af

[@CarrotConsumer]

@HalibetLector Hamilton, Madison, and Jay.* Not every founder supported The Federalist Papers. Many were opposed.

[@victoriaevelyn3953]

the square bullets to be fired at Turks made me chuckle

[@TheCaptainSplatter]

Its because the ottomon empire at the time pretty much had the whole middle east, so makes sense to just say Turks instead of muslims.

[@rentabullet4048]

Alucard Hellsing it actually suprised me that ottomans were raiding engliah coasts i heard that they raided iceland but britain!

[@grahamlopez6202]

IT'S A PUCKLE CHUCKLE

[@matspurs1629]

don't think so maybe British colonies

[@iac4357]

0:01 This poem is what's inscribed around the gun's Dial Face.

[@DIY_Miracle]

I'm sure every Empire Total War fan has been waiting for this.

[@smokedoofman4763]

Seymour Skinner Gotta leave the plains for some target practice

[@seanflannery9069]

Seymour Skinner yes I have...

[@cinemacritic9571]

yes

[@olvustin6671]

Does that thing have extra dmg against Turks?

[@SeanFication]

"I'm your Puckleberry"

[@cymond]

Thanks dude, now I'm craving Puckleberry pie!

[@slaphappypappy3782]

😂 LMAO you tickled my funny bone with that!!!

[@Martin.Wilson]

Nice one!

[@HellhunterAshworth]

It would have been nice to seen it in action even if the 'Puckle Gun' used was a recently manufactured one; for made demonstration purposes, etc.

[@Ukraineaissance2014]

Here you go kzbin.info/www/bejne/bp-3ooltpJede5o

[@BlatentlyFakeName]

That's a tiny one. I bet this full size one does some serious damage, considering it was made for sinking small boats.

[@matthiasice]

For it's era and such limited production and (assuming) also limited testing, the mechanics of this thing are SURPRISINGLY well thought out

[@LoneWolf051]

this is truly the defintion, of Steampunk Artillery

[@yetanother9127]

Nah, steampunk would be the Dynamite Gun. This is more clockpunk :P

[@ВячеславСкопюк]

steampunk would be steam cannon(it's a real thing)

[@Taolan8472]

Proper Steampunk would be this weapon, but with a steam-powered mechanism that actuated the cycling process automatically. You'd have a water jacket behind the cylinder with a hose connecting it to the ships' main reservoir to receive power.

[@caminoprojectUS]

this is more sail punk than steam punk. predates steam ships by a fair bit (roughly 100 years).

[@barthoving2053]

The principle of steam power was known a long time. However for most of that time their was no reason to develop it because the power of some humans or a couple horses was enough. Take this gun, having this system steam powered would make it bulkier, more complex and thus more unreliable and would require even more precise craftsmanship for only maybe a little advantage in rate of fire.

[@arpioisme]

no acog attachment? can my magpul magazines fit inside it?

[@ragnarokstravius2074]

Can I attach a bayonet for Close Quarter Combat if needed?

[@lazy1451]

Fits Magpul MOE part just fine

[@florisroding6157]

tactical camo paintjob, flashlight mount, and a silencer would be great as well

[@ragnarokstravius2074]

this will be the best tacticool gun ever.

[@arpioisme]

can i have a concealed carry permit for this?

[@deezynar]

It's a pity that he didn't sell more of them. He would have made improvements with feedback from customers.

[@Brad-nh8bb]

If he did sell more, warfare would have evolved differently. If they were widely adopted, some country would have optimized their use on the battlefield. Imagine how portable field artillery would become; Advancing troops flanked by batteries of Puckles which start a number of volleys toward the defending troops line. Cavalry begins to position during the barrage and attacks immediately afterward. The foot soldiers would just be needed for cleanup.

[@willfakaroni5808]

@@Brad-nh8bb these are preindustrial times, mass manufacturing these things would be infeasible, not to mention rough terrain

[@MeatGuyJ]

Ottoman pirates: "Ha ha, time to steal from the British Empire!" British Ship; "Get Puckl'd"

[@MrMalthusMusic]

The level of craftmanship is truly delightful. Thank you for sharing this oddity with us :)

[@RedcoatT]

I've known about this gun for a long time, but I was unaware how sound and advanced the design was

[@jeffbenton6183]

It seems to me that the only reason it didn't catch on was that mass-production wasn't sophisticated enough to make this affordable.

[@hexaquras9374]

First huge ass revolver

[@adamfrisk956]

Not first

[@althebest1655]

hey nice kancolle profile pic

[@gihrenzabi7271]

@largol33t1 Didn't the civil war era Remington pistols have quick change cylinders?

[@williamdaniels1113]

There’s actually one of these on display at an old Royal Navy shipyard on the Montague estate down in Beaulieu, still owned by the current Lord Montague

[@wach9191]

This must be the one of best looking weapons I have ever seen.

[@zbeshears6945]

The craftsmanship of that weapon is amazing to me for being so old

[@militaryhistoryIG]

Reminds me of the M1895 Nagant, the way the cylinder moves into the barrel to create the seal.

[@bennyboyy7]

Man this deserves more credit i think. Not a fast gun these days but back then, seems like he thought about everything for that gun.

[@DarkMattered]

In my opinion, Puckle was a genius, inventing a gun with repeating action offered a great advantage on the musket line battle field

[@righttorecord3538]

No, it didn't. You could equip 500 infantrymen with muskets for what this thing cost. They would put 1000 rounds a minute on target while this thing put 30 rounds a minute on target.

[@white0devil0]

How many videos are going to be from Institute of Military Technology? Sounds like that place would be a gold mine for Forgotten Weapons.

[@ForgottenWeapons]

Seventeen. :)

[@white0devil0]

Forgotten Weapons Awwwww yeeeaaaah

[@chunglii8]

I just came

[@matthayward7889]

Forgotten Weapons now that's the kind of Christmas present we can all enjoy...

[@Akabane011]

Indeed.

[@thelaughinghyenas7962]

Wow, I never saw one of those before! Thanks.

[@danielgoodman3578]

Thanks for showing it, explaining how this thing works, and clearing up the common 'machine gun' misunderstanding!

[@Markworth]

Cube shotgun slug has been tested. Works fine, but I'm not sure it would provide much difference in damage unless you care about what shape bullet wounds you're generating. It seems a bit of a shame that this weapon wasn't more popular. Ridiculously impressive given the technology at the time. Given how viable it seems in theory, I'd like to know just what about it made it so undesirable.

[@sparkplug1018]

Generally speaking, militaries don't like change. We've done it this way for decades and it works so were not changing now. Thats the short and sweet of it. You saw that mindset in WW1 with the machine gun, Generals still doing charges into full auto fire. Because it had worked before. Saw it with the Navy in WW2 berating the usefulness of air power over battleships. Militaries can be rather slowly changing organizations. And the more "new" or "radical" the idea the less they seem to like it.

[@sparkplug1018]

Pekka Rastas Im sure that also played a role in it.

[@creature3628]

+Pekka Rastas Aye I think this reason would be the most likely factor for it not being adopted. It'd be extremely difficult to keep that ammo stored conveniently all while keeping it dry. At sea, you can't really expect that; especially in harsh weather conditions.

[@acolyteoffire4077]

not to mention the fact that THAT much brass/extra cylinders to reload this quickly is a fair amount of weight that would reduce the speed of the ship and less room for food etc.

[@VengefulLeprechauns]

It's just incredibly expensive. That much brass, plus the very detailed craftsmanship, requiring thousands of hours for every gun, simply wasn't practical on a large scale.

[@invicta1313]

Just wondering: At what point in this video were you going to mention the fun fact that Samuel Colt almost certainly stole his revolving cylinder design from the Puckle Gun? That seems somewhat relevant.

[@ForgottenWeapons]

He did not. His inspiration came form the Colliers, and he probably was not aware of the Puckle.

[@invicta1313]

Forgotten Weapons All right...I can admit when I'm wrong. Touche. BUT...didn't Colliers patent his revolver in England, the first year he moved there, while the Puckle was on display at the Tower of London? Sooo...if Colt was "inspired" by Colliers, and Colliers was "inspired" by Puckle, then aren't we only talking about degrees of separation?

[@ForgottenWeapons]

Ultimately, it all goes back to those Chinese hand-cannons. :)

[@invicta1313]

Forgotten Weapons -- And they stole it from the dragons. Aren't we all a bunch of bastards? lol

[@Jeffrey314159]

Forgotten Weapons Indeed, the Chinese invented everything, this we know because Multiculturalists tell us so!

[@byv4480]

This seems very highly engineered and advanced for its time. Also seems to work quite smoothly. I have to imagine that the cost was the only thing that kept this from taking off, because it is AWESOME!

[@milandrobnits7078]

Do you want to know the truth? There was forgotten catastrophe in 15-17 century, after what a global and hightly advanced civilisation perished, so quite big technological gap happened too: stolenhistory.net/threads/renaissance-cannons-mysterious-and-misunderstood.1417/

[@e.s.6275]

​@@milandrobnits7078 a set of inconsistent evidence is by far not enough to make such sheer claims like "a highly advanced civilisation perished". I read it through; even the train of thoughts is hard to follow. Yes there are some mismatches in the officially claimed chain of inventions - however, there are simpler ways of explaining things. Occam's razor first bro!

[@thedemolitionsexpertsledge5552]

@@e.s.6275 forget it, they’re probably a bot

[@FoardenotFord]

This is amazing - it looks like an extremely large caliber Gatling gun. I can’t believe this came out in 1718. Also, it might be the most Steampunk weapon I’ve ever seen….