This is huge. I was just about to implement a bunch of Fortiswitches and needed this exact feature. Thanks for sharing. I plan to put this in a lab soon to test.
@saikenjkd Жыл бұрын
My local SA mentioned this was in the pipeline last year, and I'm thrilled to see it's finally available! This will certainly enable me to begin integrating FortiSwitches into data center environments.
@DannyMaas Жыл бұрын
Good to see you're back. Smooth shave too! I can't spend too much time on every What's new document, and am very dependent on guys like you highlighting these things. Hope you'll put it in a lab video as well.
@g04tn4d0 Жыл бұрын
Yeah! Welcome back to KZbins! Looking forward to seeing your new content. You're awesome!
@ztech-consulting Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for your videos brother 🙏
@buraksahin7297 Жыл бұрын
thank you so much for the video Mike ! nice shave btw
@serverch Жыл бұрын
absolutly Nice shave :) Thanks for the videos Mike your Content your Time and effort!
@RCSubmarinevideo Жыл бұрын
Welcome back! It has been a dry spell of not seeing/learning from you.
@vabello Жыл бұрын
Although I don't have FortiSwitches in my environment, it's great to see this as an option being deployed. One of my gripes with the FortiGate/FortiSwitch design was inter-vlan routing having to use resources on the FortiGate. I'd prefer the option of performance that a layer 3 switch allows if it makes sense to do. Like you said, if you don't need the security features or app visibility between VLANs, this makes a lot of sense.
@FortinetGuru Жыл бұрын
Indeed
@Technospyder1 Жыл бұрын
Been looking forward to this for a long time. I do make use of a lot of fortiswitches at a bunch of different locations and that the traffic needs to go back to fortigate was always annoying.
@EverydayMania11 ай бұрын
in the process of ripping out a cisco stack and swapping it with Fortisiwtch and implementing Fortilink. So glad to see new content from you! Is there a chance you can expand on this a bit and discuss how we can get VLAN's on separate interfaces talking to each other? (IE. VLAN 66 on a Fortilink interface passing traffic to the Hardware switch interface VLAN 82 on the same 100D)
@TheDervMan Жыл бұрын
Ohhh that’s cool. Not sure I have a need for it, but none the less it’s a great feature to have. 👌🏻 99.999% of the network traffic for us is internet bound so this isn’t applicable to our network, but who knows what’s around the corner.
@FortinetGuru Жыл бұрын
That is common. The use cases are definitely specific to a lot of datacenter approaches.
@jhippl Жыл бұрын
ill implement it on my next site refresh, hopefully by then they will have it in the gui
@80andybrown809 ай бұрын
To be fair I love Forigates but the switching is a pain in the ass. Luckily most of my deployments have either Dell or Cisco cores that handle the nice stuff. Hopefully they get there but its going to take a lot before I change my mind.
@suprovsky Жыл бұрын
i hope you feel better Mike, nice shave :)
@FortinetGuru Жыл бұрын
The air is so cold
@tech-2-co-uk6 ай бұрын
Trouble is its only supported on the 1000, 2000 or 3000 series from what I can tell.
@ThisIsEduardo Жыл бұрын
Awesome stuff !❤
@sajkoPL10 ай бұрын
Correct me if I'm not mistaken but it is only available in 1000 or higher switches? According to FortiLink Matrix.
@networkrealm155 ай бұрын
Have you got the answer. Is it only support model above 1000 ?
@disasstah7 ай бұрын
So is this the death of Trunking or are the fortinets simply just automating the processs for us?
@FortinetGuru7 ай бұрын
I wouldn't call it the death of trunking in general. Just more efficient applications.
@PloumS Жыл бұрын
@FortinetGuru11 ай бұрын
dab!
@FortiBytes Жыл бұрын
Good video beat me too it!
@FortinetGuru Жыл бұрын
More perspective and opinion is always welcome :-)
@BrianColeman1 Жыл бұрын
5 minute video and he doesn't even address where his beard went