LAWYER: Congress FORCES Breath Tests for ALL Drivers?!

[@Trilobite45]

Mandatory breath tests should be conducted for every Congressman to be allowed into any Govt session. We have way too much legislation that must have been created by drunk lawmakers.

[@MrGizmo60]

I love it, and while we're testing them we need to strap them down with a lie detector. LOL

[@KittyDad]

Hey Trilobite, I’d like to amend your proposal. I’d add “or impaired” in addition to drunk. They surely do all kinds of drugs, LOL. They should be tested for those, too! Maybe BEFORE any alcohol testing. Well, except for Barbara Botox and Nancy Piglosi of California.

[@ethanlewis1453]

The drunker they are, the more they won't know if the bribe is really worth it or not.

[@johngibson2884]

I wrote my comment and read yours basically said the same thing

[@percussion44]

100% this. As the guy below says, mandatory drug and alcohol testing before any gov't official can take part in official business. Comparing the potential damage of a piss drunk behind the wheel Vs a group of lawmakers substantially impaired...it's not even close.

[@rateyesmertz3785]

They ought to pass a bill into law that requires congressment both state and Federal to take a breathalyzer before they can cast a vote.

[@skankhunt3624]

State and federal Congressman? I think they should start making people take a breathalyzer before they post comments.

[@rateyesmertz3785]

@@skankhunt3624 If people like you had their way you'd make them submit to a full body cavity search before they posted.

[@9L252AL]

It's important to know which lawmakers sponsored this and who supported it.

[@skankhunt3624]

@@9L252AL do you support people driving under the influence?

[@9L252AL]

@Skankhunt36 No, I don't. However, I also don't support the erosion of our liberties via AI, Compliments of Congress. There's too much spin-off on this.

[@leeretaschen231]

This is not about reducing drunk driving or keeping you safe. This is about surveillance and control.

[@kathystoneburner4947]

Bingo! Who drinks and drives more than the entitled in America. Its nothing more than more B.S. control.

[@patroot2536]

100%

[@bladerunner1680]

Yup.. they can kiss my butt! Not doing it.

[@pcoc8694]

A Rhode Island councilman was passed out cold in this car he tried to say he had sleep apnea. Reilly told officers there were no drugs in his car, the officers said they found crack laced with fentanyl along with other drug paraphernalia while searching his car. There was also a crack pipe beside him.

[@missmmann9133]

Idk I didn't hear that one but I know Paul Pelosi recently hit someone on Martha's vineyard while he was bombed. It isn't about drunk driving. It's all about control.

[@sonnyinaz]

anyone in congress that passes a bill like this needs to be removed from congress.

[@williardbillmore5713]

You mean like Mike Johnson and John Thune?

[@sonnyinaz]

@@williardbillmore5713 interesting question as they are polar opposites..

[@BadMonkeyMike]

All police, CIA, FBI, DEA, ICE and all other government officers should have mandatory breath test before reporting for duty, and then every 4 hrs while on duty. Judges should do this before taking the bench, and congress and the senate should also have mandatory breathalyzer test every 4 hrs while working.

[@levitezoe1804]

Where do I sign

[@OGKenG]

Well. Since the majority of cops don't drink before work...

[@jl123ist]

​@@OGKenGthat's why he said every 4 hours during the shift as well

[@OGKenG]

@@jl123ist So, what reason would you tie up resources and conduct this kind of nonsense? Do you have any validation of reasoning to justify this? Is there some long history of cops showing up drunk or drinking on duty? Or (and this is more self-evident), is this a retaliatory suggestion because some lawmaker floated a bill?

[@jl123ist]

@@OGKenG there have been cases of officers drinking on the job for a long time. I've even seen one of them do it myself. And yes it is also in retaliation of their garbage they shouldn't get to do it to the American public unless they are subject to it themselves.

[@jamesbrinkman9332]

It all started with the Patriot Act. If you give up your freedoms for safety, you deserve neither.

[@Blgtn43]

Yep

[@joeskeptical4762]

*A lot of people handed over their freedom and their rights like scrap paper, when the coronavirus BS came along. Telling people how many parishioners can attend a house of worship? Who can run a food store and how many people can enter? How we vote?*

[@austinnewhart2959]

Sounds nice, but what have you done?

[@gordonwalley1116]

You deserve what you tolerate

[@svnbit8408]

​@@joeskeptical4762we used to joke that church in an airplane was ok

[@sparklander]

They ought to mandate all politicians get mandatory cognitive tests.

[@mobilemechanics6565]

Good luck on that theyll cry ablism ie guy who stroked out and got elected anyway in Pa

[@mobilemechanics6565]

😂

[@jsivco3sivco785]

@@mobilemechanics6565 --- Unfortunately, Fetterman is my US Senator! 😯

[@totallyjonesin]

@@mobilemechanics6565 You really think he was 'elected'?

[@starastronomer]

​@@jsivco3sivco785 My condolences 🙏

[@knightingale9833]

I work for a school bus company, last year they implemented these Lytx cameras on all their buses that have AI algorithms that constantly tells you you’re doing things wrong, it has this annoying speaker on it with a shrill female voice they everyone at the company (except the higher ups) has come to hate. And the major problem with it is it’s wrong 90% of the time. It tells you you’re following the vehicle in front of you too closely when you come to a stop sign or a red light, it’s even said that when we were on an empty road, it tells you you’re speeding whenever you pass an exit on the highway because the GPS shows you as being on the street next to the on or off ramps, it’s claimed we’ve ran stop signs where there were no stop signs, and most hilariously when we’re at the company base it picks up the stops signs on the buses that are parked there and tells us we ran through them. What makes all this not so funny though is it send a real-time message to the office taddling on us. Implementing crappy AI algorithms like this into every car in the country is not gonna go well, especially if people start getting traffic tickets mailed to them for things they didn’t do. Everyone will be getting them, constantly.

[@SquirrelDarling1]

Trucking companies were putting this garbage in their new fleet trucks too. It’s absolutely terrible! But being truck drivers, we found a way around it. A simple piece of paper slid over the lens and a stupid Covid mask was enough to defeat the system and return our driving, plus our privacy to us. Now this was two years ago, who knows what new “improved” junk they’re putting in the new trucks now since I quit driving.

[@avgjoegeek71]

They should make it mandatory to do a complete financial and personal audit of anyone running for Congress - then do it every quarter while they are in office. Have to explain where every dime they receive is accounted for.

[@kelvinvann1969]

💯

[@billyyank5807]

Lol go learn about financial disclosure. They do have to report things. Go look it up. You can go look up every congress member. Duh. The fact you don't understand it just shows you know nothing. Lame take on your part.

[@mysteriesoftherealm]

@@billyyank5807 They are all covering for each other. The systems they have to report to are inadequate and abused and run by their families and friends who ALL steal from the public. Asking cookie monster to guard the cookies doesn't make sense does it? Their system makes dam sure honest folks don't get in , you must be stupid to even write or think that there is anything fair about a bunch of criminal reporting to each other. CLOWN!

[@SvendleBerries]

@@billyyank5807 It needs to be done independently. Seriously, if we cant trust our politicians and the people that work for them, what makes you think we can trust their record keeping? Its the same crap when police departments investigate themselves and find they did nothing wrong. We cannot trust our public servants anymore. We need to stand behind them and watch everything they do like an alcoholic taking a piss test. Full transparency, no exceptions. If they refuse, then that will be taken as their resignation and they will get thrown out into the street like the bums they are. Our public _servants_ need to stop exhibiting behavior above their station.

[@mg-by7uu]

Well considering no one even knows the majority of their money comes from the billions in bribes they all take from corporations each year it wouldn't matter

[@margaretnorton4067]

Only politicians should have mandatory daily breath tests and weekly drug tests . They should also have IQ tests and polygraphs regularly. They should be audited constantly. The results should be posted publically

[@ridge6496]

I agree

[@Michael_Bradburn]

So let it be written, So let it be done.

[@phrack420]

Truth

[@tacvolun3570]

Yeah I think everybody would agree to that except for congress itself

[@iamtheoffenderofall]

Polygraph? You know pathological liars will ace those things, right?

[@BlessedJourneySunAngel]

It’s not about drunk driving…it’s about control

[@udrinkit]

Yep. Fits right in with 15 minute cities.

[@Bill-sp8kb]

"You'll own nothing and be happy". "Santa" Klause Schwab

[@drunkwolf2477]

dont forget money, how much do you think its going to cost to have somthing like this installed? then every month you have to take it in for maintenance? not to mention all the hidden fees of owning one even though you are forced to? My brother had to have one of these on his car from a dui and let me tell you, if they force this on the public its going to be a huge money maker, just like the smog scam on cars.

[@Davidd-xf7sy]

That is a fact

[@starastronomer]

Comrades, it's all in your best interest. Trust your government 😳

[@Ccontryboyy]

We have given these ppl way to much power.....

[@captainjimolchs]

No, we haven't. They usurped it.

[@williardbillmore5713]

Why are you so afraid that you won't have the freedom to drink and drive? Do you drink and drive that often, now? What else are you trying to hide?

[@Ccontryboyy]

@williardbillmore5713 no I don't t drink and drive, nor do I drink..

[@williardbillmore5713]

@@Ccontryboyy AA? Okay now I understand.

[@MrGizmo60]

Wow, considering that 84 of our legislators have been caught for drunk driving in the past year, we need to replace ALL of them! We hire them to conduct commerce for the country, not create laws that violate OUR rights! Such hypocrites!

[@skankhunt3624]

Which right would this violate?

[@gregorywhite4345]

4th Amendment

[@JRBendixen]

The 84 number is not right. And he is lying. If you do not get the full text read out loud and a source, its a lie.

[@MrGizmo60]

@@JRBendixen Uh oh, your demorat is showing! Only 'they' can accuse without proof, so I say to you, "if I gave you a list of the names not one of the accused would step forward. I said they were CAUGHT I didn't say convicted or prosecuted, oh, didn't you know? EVERYONE from the president on down to the lowly government clerk, has immunity in one form or another. Guess who doesn't...US! Open your eyes. Oh and here is another good one 19 have been ACCUSED of writing bad checks...71 cannot get a credit card due to bad credit rating, so yes, and I ask... who voted the criminals be in charge of the nut house?

[@carlt6932]

​@@skankhunt3624 The right to travel.

[@pappaflammyboi5799]

All laws should be applied to all politicians first for several years, before it can be applied to the general public.

[@mattwitte4859]

Yes great idea along with mandatory fiscal laws requiring them to report all tax spending directly to the public.

[@apostlewoody]

Excellent idea !!

[@WARDADDY72]

Yes I support.

[@tekman2011]

agreed

[@tekman2011]

especially Congress, since they actually MAKE LAWS

[@kater.7563]

My car has “lane assist” in it, which almost killed me. I was able to finally disable it and it is permanently off! When I brought it into the dealership after the above incident, they gave me a bulletin from Mazda, stating it was a “known” problem. Cars do collect data on your driving. Cops need a search warrant to tap that information. My car shows the current speed limit, BUT it also picks up speed limits from the signs on the service road. At one part of I-29, where the actual speed limit is 65, my car states it is 25mph. That is why I cannot do one of the insurance company discount plug ins.

[@GenXPertChannel]

That not really how the data presents of queried- your GPS coordinates and speed are recorded, but the speed limit data represented in your on-screen nav system GPS is not tied to the data collection at all. If you want an insurance company to monitor everything you do to save a couple bucks, go for it. The amount of data your car stores is truly amazing, but correlation to speed limits isn't one of them.

[@curlyfries5095]

Yeah, go ahead, sign up for those insurance data gatherers to save a bit of money . . . Temporarily that is. Your rates will skyrocket when the data is processed.

[@bojohannesen4352]

My first experience with lane assist was with a loaner from the work shop. It literally changed lane into another car, because of a shadow on the street while driving under a bridge.

[@UtubeMyAccountName]

My question is why no lawyer ever challenges the Constitutionality of these laws. This is a literal violation of both the 4th & 14th Amendments.

[@dknowles60]

because 99% or lawyers vote dem and dems are mean and nasty

[@robertabbott6736]

it has to be put into effect then it can be challenged

[@kevinroberts781]

​@@robertabbott6736 it is in effect. Manufacturer are already building the systems. It needs to be challenged right now. Don't wait until you force all car mfgs to go bankrupt due to no one buying your trash.

[@baldisaerodynamic9692]

@@kevinroberts781 i do not disagree with you....but its not mandatory until 2026. i still dont see why it cannot be done before car companies install this trash. and just another reason to not buy a ford

[@mobe1776]

They never read what they vote on.

[@hollibuchanan6433]

These politicians who came up with this BS are a threat to public safety! We need to get rid of everyone of them! This is outrageous and totally unconstitutional!

[@waktosha7378]

Yeah...... We need to second amendment them!

[@sammgold1603]

Commercial liens

[@John_Doe27]

@@waktosha7378 okay fed

[@waktosha7378]

@@John_Doe27 ???

[@daveassanowicz186]

Where in the Constitution does it say you have the Right to drive?

[@GenghisKhan311]

We need to start following and recording our representatives constantly. Immediately tired of them writing laws that don't apply to them.

[@strongkafir2711]

So, if I sanitize my hands before I get in my car what happens?

[@aslkdjfzxcv9779]

youre not tired of it.

[@Fkay396912]

If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.

[@dead2802]

​@@strongkafir2711just answered your own question.

[@joshm3342]

What happens when vehicle is used for overnight camping, and you drink a few beers, and start the engine to charge battery or heat up vehicle before going to sleep? What happens when doing oil change or repairs, and have a beer (NOT going to drive on public roads) and re-position vehicle on private property, as needed for the work?

[@phillipwenzel1067]

what about having sex in said vehicles?

[@Mediocre00Rebel]

First the RESTRICT ACT, now the dystopian future hidden inside the "infrastructure" bill. Never trust the government if they say theyre doing something for "national security reasons."

[@mah7961]

Usually stuff like this is hidden or reworded as some new invention or feature. And often people fall for it without reading the fine print. Like when those new smart thermostats cam out in early 2010’s. Of course people were stoked about controlling their air conditioning from the cellphones or pc. And had eco friendly systems in place. Of course in the fine print it mentioned that once you sign on the power company can have direct access to the thermostat and over ride any settings at anytime for what they call saving power on the grid. Now you have Biden pushing the ev cars on everyone.

[@sammadison1172]

Well it only wins if people buy them. I'd boycott purchasing a car with this type of surveillance, but I don't know how many others would. Certainly they'll repeal this requirement real quick if it starts ruining EV sales.

[@letfreedomring43]

No don’t trust the government they say ANYTHING..

[@ohnoao9847]

"The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the Government, and I'm here to help. " President Ronald Reagan

[@threeball8740]

Mean while you're taking advice from a government official

[@jameshanna8762]

The really scary aspect of this law is the precedent it makes for spying on citizens in places where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy. If they can install mandatory monitoring systems in our cars, then they could just as easily 'justify' installing monitoring systems in our homes. This law needs to be strangled in the crib.

[@BadMonkeyMike]

Apparently you no longer have reasonable expectations of privacy 😢

[@danielstadden1149]

You have no right to privacy, your supreme Court took care of that.

[@jameshanna8762]

@@danielstadden1149 We still have the right to privacy. Just because a government violates our rights doesn't mean the right goes away. Rights can't be taken, only infringed.

[@__Salty]

@@jameshanna8762 Agreed

[@danielstadden1149]

@@jameshanna8762 Who gave these rights? Might makes rights.

[@jamescallon2455]

How about drug and alcohol test for all government employees?

[@nicoleking772]

They ALWAYS exclude themselves

[@RedEd1969]

Just elected government officials

[@dead2802]

This will be used against folks politically, racially, voicing an opinion not popular, smoking or drinking a soda or eating, criticizing some official, whats considered overuse of AC unit, swerving for an animal, unpopular religious view/belief, driving thru a pothole, music wrong kind or too loud, singing/humming/talking to yourself, improper placement hands on wheel, braking to slowly/swiftly, accelerating to fast, stranding an oponants kid on a dangerous location, purposely causing a vehicular accident, for glancing in rearview mirror, etc goes 4ever. Wont make it a week! Has Nothing to do w safety. just control, causing accidents, payback, stealing vehicles, supplying free labor, to what? Thought crime? Of course. The 2 already using this crap; Ford and ? Boycott. Put em out of bs! So sick of this control/crap.

[@billpennock8585]

I assume this part of the law will be challenged to the Supreme Court Level eventually. Hopefully they will make the car manufacturers recall all vehicles to disable or remove these devices

[@williardbillmore5713]

Why are you so afraid that you won't have the freedom to drink and drive? Do you drink and drive that often, now? What else are you trying to hide?

[@billpennock8585]

No but a person close to me had to drive with an interlock and it is extremely difficult and dangerous due to the distraction. Also it’s an invasion of privacy and assumption of guilt.

[@williardbillmore5713]

@@billpennock8585 The person close to you who had to drive with an interlock was really you wasn't it, Bill... Now I understand. Only your car will know you are guilty of trying to drive drunk and the car assumes nothing. It will start when you are sober and it will not when you are drunk. Most cars will not start unless you push down on the brake pedal when you turn the key as a safety precaution against the car lurching forward. Same thing. No invasion of privacy ...no assumption of "guilt". It is a machine. It performs according to it's program.

[@ablejohnson]

We need to ban high capacity congressional terms!

[@danialphaomega]

Or 1772

[@thinkcasting3182]

Buy drive trains from wrecked cars now. They'll be worth a fortune in the future to swap out these Minority Report engines and trans.

[@ashersdad1755]

​@Think Casting hell yea, and if you cant you better learn how to fix your old cars now

[@brion_aiota]

@@thinkcasting3182 this is just the first step, once it’s in effect their next logical step will be to try and incrementally make that illegal

[@GrimGianni]

This isn't about drunk driving, it's about government sticking their noses into the lives of the citizens. This will be used to enforce laws outside of drunk driving, and will leave citizens with no place to have privacy whatsoever. This is another step of tyranny against the citizens, and should be opposed on all fronts. ANY company that abides by this should be boycotted to the fullest extent.

[@trevordsouza2420]

It is about big business! We have to pay for this crap?

[@stevengagnon4777]

This is what I see. They are going to limit mobility and monitor what you do. The open highways are essential for a free poeple. This technology will essentially give a government agency absolute authoritarian control of free movement.

[@frankvandalen6524]

One more thing. Driving is not a privilege! It's a right. You pay for the road. You pay for the equipment you use on the road. You pay, and you pay! And what you pay for is your right to use. We have traffic rules and regulations, but those are for the safe and effective flow of traffic. And nothing more.

[@myprivatewar]

​@@stevengagnon4777traffic lights do the same thing...on a lower level....

[@marquisdelafayette1929]

This is about out of control lobbying (MADD). They claim to be “against drunk driving “ but have lobbied for people already convicted of drunk driving to (in lieu of having a suspended license) be required to install breathalyzers. So you are required to install it… you aren’t allowed to take a plain suspension. When you follow the money you see that MADD quietly invested in these companies that monitor and install these devices which they then lobbied courts to reverse their original laws requiring suspensions and force install these devices instead. They have now increased these businesses revenue by billions in a few years.

[@Budman_4044]

We had a state congressman that wanted to lower the BAC level to .05. He got arrested for a DUI not long after his proposal.

[@svnbit8408]

My dui lawyer got caught drunk with cocaine. I got off and I'm sure he did too it's a damn racket they all trade favors in the court room.

[@theelvisguy6933]

Commercial driver’s license holders are held to .04%

[@jakdrpr2106]

Typical

[@lanthanumlanthanium6373]

It's always the one's that oppose and scream the loudest that are most guilty.

[@AngriestAmerican]

Elliot Spitzer was praised for his new Prostitution laws. He was caught with a $5k a night hooker.

[@bladerunner5810]

Is there any effort being made to take this to the Supreme Court and squashed as unconstitutional?

[@Fkay396912]

If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.

[@lrmackmcbride7498]

We don't know how it will work or be used. The supreme court refuses to hear cases about potential violations. Until it is in place, don't expect a challenge.

[@williardbillmore5713]

That is what people like you said about seat belts and air bags. Ha ha ha ha

[@SymphoniasStories]

This law should be taken to the Supreme Court. It's practically illegal search.

[@_LVC]

They are too busy , they're busy with cases like a dog toy that resembles a jack Daniels bottle, that's a real thing 🐕‍🦺

[@harrygearhart4520]

Not the Supreme Court in place now!

[@samuelwilkinson6487]

Do you actually think anybody in positions of power are gonna help us? The answer is no no their not. The general public is on there own.

[@allussin2076]

We need to protest

[@_LVC]

@@allussin2076 ok set that up

[@dorianward4909]

The Federal Government needs to be slashed back to the few powers enumerated in the Constitution. Any unconstitutional law must be abolished and the authors of said unconstitutional removed from office. Abolish qualified immunity for all government employees.

[@kellychristus2496]

You've clearly never read article 1 section 8 clause 18 and didn't pay attention to what the Marshall Court stated in McCullough v. Maryland.

[@Seadog..C5]

Well hello, that's what Ted Cruz was advocating for. But nobody heard Ted Cruz because blah blah blah Trump

[@Seadog..C5]

@@kellychristus2496 Convention of states

[@duxdawg]

@@Seadog..C5 A CoS with the libtards running the table?? Do you want us to lose what few rights we have left??? Now is definitely NOT the time for a CoS!

[@WhydoIsuddenlyhaveahandle]

​@kellychristus2496 Sounds like you never read it. Congress is only authorized to do very specific things, and the federal government is further restricted by the 10th amendment. An Article V convention, which we are over halfway to declaring, overrides anything the federal government or the Supreme Court says anyway. They have absolutely no input whatsoever in such a case.

[@stevenbingham3061]

How in the hell has this not blown up??? I'm seeing this video 8 months from it's release and this is the first time I'm hearing about this. This NEEDS to be repealed!!! Everybody should forward this to the ACLU and complain to their congressman!!!!

[@TeddyBism]

People are sleeping...... as long as you don't mess with their lil bubble. Then everything is possible... then it's too late when they finally wake up......

[@BradleyLoomis-wq9yf]

Yes this is 💯 CROCK OF 💩!!!

[@spaghettilibro]

Everyone was watching Johnny Depp and Amber Heard ...

[@Pax-vobiscum]

The analogy of cooking the frog in a pot of water comes to mind

[@jsj297]

ACLU lmao that’s cute 😅

[@1JamesHamilton1]

I just saw this for the first time. Just imagine if someone is trying to get away from somebody who is trying to kill them. However, this law needs to be challenged before the US Supreme Court. Unlawful Serch and seizure. I hope the Supreme Court would squash the police state.

[@rjstegbauer]

Maybe there will be settings for "fleeing an abuser" or "medical emergency" that can be activated when necessary?

[@Fkay396912]

If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.

[@1JamesHamilton1]

@rjstegbauer yeah can you just imagine, Wait a minute before you kill me. I need to find my selector switch and then find the fleeing a murderer setting on my selector switch. Or telling your loved one, don't bleed too fast. I can't get the selector switch to work 😫

[@joshm3342]

The Supreme Court is the handmaid of the police state.

[@Jaxmusicgal23]

@@1JamesHamilton1 I know right these are all the things I’m thinking I’ve had a stalker… I had friends be attacked by somebody while they’re trying to get in their car at Walmart… They got away because they were able to immediately pull out and get out of the parking lot . What if you have to do a breathalyzer every time you drive or the car shut down because it reads your behavior improperly as being drunk when all you are scared for your life…. This sounds like such a danger to everybody…. I don’t trust a computer to be able to supersede my decisions . I am a grown human being. I can make my own decisions as an adult about what I’m safe to do and what I am not. This idea that we are all overgrown children that can’t think and feel and react and make decisions for ourselves is exactly the issue we have . Are there people that are overgrown and they do not act responsibly? Of course … If we’re concerned that increasing, we should do something to help society that problem, not legislate laws to prevent people from being able to do every day things and use the tools they have in their lives, whether it be a car or something at their house and have to be constantly watched by everybody to make sure we “behave”… We are not a society of children and the sooner we start pushing back and telling the government to F off and then we are adults that can handle our own lives and they need to back off… We need to stand up and the way we do that is by refusing to buy those cars for as long as we can… scared the crap out of them Also, if it does cause problems for you, you need to sue the government if you get an accident because of one of these stupid cars, whether it’s your car or someone else’s The government and demand that federal law because it is unconstitutional and dangerous … We also could start calling the Supreme Court and demand this law as unconstitutional .

[@99savage1]

Aren’t these congressmen/women the worst offenders of road laws? I remember seeing a video of a lady listing off an ungodly amount of charges only to reveal the crimes were all committed by these people. They need to be held to higher standards but it seems they never will…

[@stacyw.1863]

'Rules for thee. Not for me.'

[@mschlund1]

Yes, but remember the laws don't pertain to them

[@3sc4p1sm]

Lol quit acting like u didnt know the gov was becoming tyrannical. Keep paying ur taxes and get over it george washington

[@rampagingshrew3191]

No, it's everyone

[@Saltee323]

No! They are constantly held to a much lesser standard. The Covid lockdowns proved as much. Every Democrat that was in favor of lockdowns, violated them while regular people were arrested. Gov Whitmer had a dude arrested for fishing alone in the middle of a great lake. Yet she and her husband regularly went out on their boat. Pelosi and the Mayor of Chicago getting their hair done maskless. Gov Newsome dining with friends and family at closed restaurants. In fact, if you wanted freedom you had to go to a Republican state.

[@FirstLast-vr7es]

re-vo-lu-tion. It's time. No taxation without representation. In case anyone hasn't noticed, our "representatives" are such in name only.

[@HEllis-qu5nn]

Then you have to support candidates that dont take any corporate money and want to take money out of politics. No dark money and low caps on donations. If you cant buy politicians then they have to answer to the voters. My guess is that you didnt support these plans and vote for Bernie Sanders. He was the only presidential candidate to want to take money out of politics and rebuke corporations and still is. This is why the media ñies about him...he wants to remove corporate control over our media so they are free to report the truth.

[@darkprinc979]

Oh, they're representatives alright. The real question is who's interests do they represent? Some of them are legitimate and actually represent the American people, but far too many represent other interests, such as corporate interests, foreign interests or ideological interests.

[@Xiaengao]

@@darkprinc979 You're an optimist.

[@darkprinc979]

@@Xiaengao On the contrary, either you're a pessimist or you have unrealistically high expectations. There's no magic button here that automatically makes everything right just because a few of the right people were put into office, and for sure it takes more than elected officials to turn things around. In the first place, it doesn't get to be this bad overnight, or because one or two bad politicians were put into office. The fact of the matter is that our governmental system was designed for everyone to be engaged, and in order for it to continue properly everyone has to have their priorities in order when they go to the voting booth. We ended up in this situation because the American people became corrupted, and in turn voted corruptly. Every person that goes out and votes for politicians that promise them benefits is part of the problem, but just as much are the people that "don't like to talk politics", because they are paving the way for the corrupt voters to get what they want. The only way for this to be turned around is for the U.S to turn from its hedonistic ways and back to God, who is the only source of good in the world. We have to return to the traditional values that used to govern this country, and that can only work if we turn back to the source of those values.

[@CrazyFreeCat82]

We as a nation need to take a stand against these laws!!

[@aaronclark1599]

You can by becoming a state National.. Y'all gotta wake up and do something.

[@TheGhost2612000]

Don’t worry there will be a major decline in new vehicle sales. Used cars will be worth more so stock up now, and buy Uber and Lyft stock.

[@tacvolun3570]

​​@@TheGhost2612000 I can understand buying older/current cars with a day older technology but why uber and lift? why the very regular cars but ones that are more worn out even more used by uber and lyft? And people won't fight against it. People wish somebody else would change it for them. People take no responsibility for making changes so changes don't happen bcause they want somebody ELSE to fight for justice. People Are too lazy to fight for change so instead we just get mad and whine. We WILL just accept what happens. PEOPLE complain, they whine, they want things to be reasonable but people are to lazy to make that happen.

[@boataxe4605]

Yes,vote Libertarian.

[@TheGhost2612000]

@@tacvolun3570 more people will use Uber and Lyft is what my prediction is.

[@jeffreyyoung4104]

We should demand mandatory drug tests for politicians before they enter the building and before they vote!

[@eion-stephenson]

We need an infrastructure bill that monitors politicians and government workers.

[@mustardseedsociety]

And POE LEE ZEZ

[@stevehamman4465]

The infrastructure money and inflation bill money are going to basically California for water supplies. Yes again,, the country has again bailed out Cali with covid money, and two more Bill's after wards. Get a clue ,, wake up America , Cali is draining America.

[@mfgc2610]

A-hem... We the people with our vote ARE the monitors. We just need to vote bye bye to politicians after one term. FJB has done NOTHING in his life except hold a political job.

[@evilspoon5280]

@@mfgc2610 ...the problem is vote fraud. If the democrats dont like the potential outcome, they just cheat to gain and keep power. Our vote means nothing in the face of the mass vote fraud that the democrats have.

[@mustardseedsociety]

@@mfgc2610 Actually I don't believe in "voting". When you "vote", you're just giving consent for evil tyrants to rule over you. And yes, I already know I just triggered a bunch of people. I've heard all the stupid dumb arguments why you need to "vote" and after 30 years of studying this topic, that's the conclusion I've reached. Positive change will NEVER EVER happen because of "voting". The ONLY hope for humanity is obsoleteness of tyrannical strongholds. The ONLY way for that to happen is QUIT participating in the deeds of evil entities. By far the best place to start, is actually very doable and the tyrants won't even bother you {usually} and that is QUIT USING THE PUBLIC EDUCATION SYSTEM !!! By rendering the Public education system obsolete, you have made a HUGE step towards a true freedom and liberty society, as well as a more educated society and more productive.

[@pukeschannel6882]

I mostly want mandatory breath tests for all congress members....every day.

[@leifnerheim5552]

Every 30 seconds.

[@MrPhlypc]

Thiis is real and drug test like athletes.

[@perkins1439]

You mean blood test most of them mfers are on cocaine and breath test wouldn't pick it up

[@billbarham9401]

And that information needs to be published daily for the American public to see.

[@PLA5207]

we the people who abide freedom, are obliged to make congress reverse this vile legislation. also, boycott all companies making these vehicles.

[@spaceman7582]

Amen 👍💪

[@craigherbert200]

That might be their plan they already don't want us driven

[@thewaywardwind548]

> YES! All Congress critters who voted for this bill should be fired by the voters in the next election. > Won't work. ALL vehicle manufacturers will be required to comply with the law. I suppose we could all refuse to buy new cars and limit our purchases to used cars only. That might put the manufacturers out of business. But the problem is not the manufacturers -- the problem is the Congress and the President.

[@carbide1968]

ford is packed with unsold f 150's now wait to we stop buying them in mass. yes im pissed they abide instead of fighting this. 80k for a snitch truck?

[@PrimericanIdol]

​​@@thewaywardwind548 Here's the thing. If they're insidious enough, they'll impose super high taxes on older vehicles, or ban them outright. Japan has done something similar where if a car is 5 years old or older, it's taxed to heaven and back.

[@woodsrdr]

If government was concerned about our safety and not revenue, there would be a cop outside every bar offering a PBT to everyone that leaves the bar. Instead, they set up down the road, watch people get in their cars and drive away before stopping them and offering a PBT... Neither government nor policing has EVER been about our safety.

[@craig6430]

Like Ronald Reagan said, "The worst thing that you can hear is, we're from the government and we're here to help."

[@benjaminromberg2091]

He also said, the problem with government is government!

[@Mikgwerd]

...And then he proceeds to raise the drinking age to 21 (while not remembering doing so).

[@jackiekostiw5298]

I always liked Reagan. I was 7 thinking “He’s a nice guy”.

[@srobeck77]

unfortunately those welfare mommas and illegal immigrants are happy to see the gov giving them freebies

[@Fkay396912]

If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.

[@brokentombot]

Imagine driving down a rough road dodging potholes and the Feds shut down your car.

[@anonnnymousthegreat]

Or someone trying to run you off the road in a road rage situation.

[@bondobilly9369]

California.......

[@jrag1000]

Or a deer, or need to avoid another car or pedestrian.

[@redlisab]

Any and every single one of them would kill their own mothers for a dollar.

[@ct7999]

Imagine your in a situation where you need to leave your home let’s say to get to work and your car won’t start because you used mouth wash. Or let’s say your pregnant wife starts going into labor right after you lay down for bed and your car won’t start because you had just brushed your teeth 😢

[@davewilhelm2508]

Why do those in government always want to watch us? It's really creepy. Lawsuits need to be filed

[@redlisab]

Because *they* are really creeps!

[@RalphJones-oy7te]

It's illegal the supreme court already ruled video surveillance on private property is a constitutional right violation!! A vehicle is private property!! So if a government agency camera is illegal on private property then I 100% guarantee that a breathalyzer is violating them same rights!! Always stand up for your rights!!

[@DelawareHOG]

To control us, China comes in all the tools are in place. 😮

[@jonathanstatham88]

No one is going to actually stand up. They never do.

[@catangelcarpenter5390]

They are chronic narcissist's. So disgusting. Let's stop this somehow.😮

[@craigsawyer6453]

It is appalling that they think our freedom is something to play with. This idea was not well thought out. Besides the disregard for our rights, mechanical things beak and malfunction. Electric "self driving" cars have taught us that software can do things that lead to accidents. If you were shaky from a large cut, loosing blood, and were trying to get to the hospital, this would not be a good idea. Imagine washing your interior windows with a window cleaner that has alcohol as an ingredient... In an emergency you would not be able to move your car. I often "straighten" the curves so my passengers are more comfortable and my lane departure alarm goes off. How would this system react? What happens when your vehicle gets old and the thing breaks? Boeing found out the hard way that software does not fix every problem, adding more complexity to an already complex machine is not smart.

[@Fkay396912]

If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.

[@legalizefreedom451]

We need new politicians that understand how creepy this is. They always use "safety" to monitor us.

[@N-Lee]

Big Brother...He loves us and cares about us.

[@hypsyzygy506]

Corporations should be permitted to harm people without consequence? Or should government legislate for public safety?

[@Mediocre00Rebel]

Whenever you see them do something for "national security reasons" be suspicious and concerned.

[@legalizefreedom451]

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety" ~Ben Franklin~

[@robinreed1691]

This is so creepy

[@mantralife6620]

They should make it mandatory for police officers, Congress, senate, doctors, lawyers, judges and more before they go to work each day

[@8REI-]

I agree... including an average Joe.

[@TrueBlue2024]

That’s a great idea, it should be tested and validated on those groups of people for 2 years while they weed out the software bugs.

[@WubiWatkins]

Exactly if you work in the public you get tested its really easy

[@2strokinit527]

All goverment workers down to the local dog catcher!

[@kennethflores-hv7uf]

Make it for everyone and I’m down with it.

[@Nordalh7]

I'm old enough to remember when it wasn't illegal to not wear a safety belt. Then they passed a law that you could get a ticket for not wearing your safety belt if you were pulled over for something else. Then later on they passed a law that you could be pulled over for not wearing your safety belt just by itself. It's definitely a slippery slope.

[@MrGizmo60]

When we were told we had to have a license to drive, and we complied, we all fell under the states control thru "Compelled performance" But any contract must also contain an "Implied benefit" as well, so what is the Implied benefit? There is none, so there is no contract. And the proof is at UCC 1-308 which states " you cannot be forced or compelled to enter into any contract without knowing first the Implied benefit or the compelled performance of that contract.

[@mikefarmer4748]

Seat belts and maximum speed limits. The federal government takes taxes for transportation then puts strings on it to dole some of it back out to the states. Other than being useless and easily bypassed, this will be unconstitutional.

[@bamahama707]

Soon it will be illegal to breathe.

[@SuperSushidog]

@@bamahama707 That's ridiculous. It will only be illegal to exhale - without paying the appropriate CO2 emissions carbon tax, of course.

[@southernflatland]

​@@SuperSushidog They already charge people to sleep, it's called rent. If you own your own property, it's called property tax. So yeah, it wouldn't surprise me if they started charging people to breathe one day...

[@raccoondon488]

What if you have to slam on the brakes on a lonely country road because a crazy deer jumps out in front of your car but the stupid monitoring system deems that as reckless driving ?

[@joshm3342]

Yes. I was in Australia in 1987 driving a rented car at night, when a kangaroo jumped across the road in front of me. I just avoided hitting it, but to a monitoring system, it would have looked like I randomly braked hard at 60 mph, then continued on.

[@augustusgarton58]

I know what I would do if it was deer season, and not "Wabbit season"😂

[@stephend9899]

Hold these criminals, accountable to their own laws.

[@Recken1]

We need to hold them accountable to the Constitution and abolish their stupid laws.

[@LEK-we2hh]

🙈😂

[@James-m2y2d]

time to vote them out of office this our is congress who swore an oath to protect our constitutional rights are we kidding ourselves

[@eileennavarrete9459]

For every law they make against the citizens, we need to make laws against them. Start with them giving themselves raises without citizens consent.

[@KattD.]

Why keep making laws for the same garbage the people keep voting back in the first place? 😂 The entire government need to fear it's people, not vice versa. Only way to fix all this bullshxt is, "We The People" need to FIRE THE ENTIRE GOVERNMENT and start from scratch. Also, need to cut the government in half, set term limits for them all and everything needs to be cut off the moment they are done. We the people should not have to pay for they're security once they are done, voted out, retired, etc etc etc. And we need to have a civil war against all the libturds on top of it. The demoncrappic party are the main cause of all this mess. And George Soros and his family need to be taken care of too 🎤 drop

[@supme7558]

They have to drive new cars to hello it will affect them once enough go to jail then will go back to how it was in the 70s how it should of stayed ...madd is a joke

[@drivenmad7676]

This is AI based. Much kike everything else.

[@raymondready7496]

Everyone stop paying taxes. Everybody. Buy silver with your savings and bury it. Everybody.

[@nedtaylor1983]

Good idea but it will never happen.

[@jimtedesco]

That is the real question, did congress exempt themselves from this law? I'm betting yes they did.

[@lorirommel519]

Well, since they have drivers to chauffeur them around, this law won't really affect them. They can imbibe to their heart's content, since it's never even their turn to be the designated driver. Considering the ridiculous legislation that they've been producing, I think they've been exempting themselves for quite some time.

[@lifeinlimbo2186]

Damn right they did

[@DanMcD80]

How many gun grabbing dems have private security details with guns?!?!

[@jeffreypelaske841]

We will pay for the congressman's personal driver so they wont have any data to explain during election. this is the same as how politicians get their accounts to make their tax returns look great before they release them for election.

[@jimtedesco]

@@jacquelinel1618 They don't collect shit, they only fling it!

[@DarkVixxen]

That is terrifying... "Public Safety will always be the alibi of tyrants." -Albert Camus

[@chrisfisher1100]

"WE" Should pass a law that requires Congress, the house the senate ALL to read every page, and every word, on every bill, law, etc... And then required to pass a "Reading and Comprehension" exam... in order to be ABLE TO VOTE ON THEM...

[@Kimm_Berlyn]

YES!!!!

[@mg-by7uu]

They just pass the laws their corporate employers tell them to. Otherwise the billions in "lobbying dollars" they take annually would get cut off

[@JonJaeden]

Read? Make them write it out like the Bible required the king to do ... Deuteronomy 17:18-20

[@One-way]

Read PUBLICLY… let’s see what is really in these laws

[@waaynneb1808]

I propose that EVERY law that Congress passes is FIRST effective for those in Congress (..for let's say, 4 years) BEFORE it can be used against We the 'ORDINARY' People. I suspect that a LOT of laws would be rescinded/ nullified.

[@ralphquinteros7564]

Fat chance of that since Congress makes the laws in the first place!

[@MrPitbull117]

“Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety” -Benjamin Franklin

[@arjayla]

Once you need to 'break the law' in an emergency is when you will feel the injustice of this intrusive system.

[@kevincasey7892]

The danger level of this is off the charts despite the privacy violations imagine if you’re fleeing a criminal will it limit your speed? Will it decide you’re impaired and stop your car in a dangerous area? Can a bad actor hack and kill your car? What if you’re sick attempting to get to a hospital? How long until your willingness to give up your rights affect mine?

[@basanistes359]

Nothing about this shit is good. We will all be slaves if this type of thing continues.

[@jimr3751]

And or trying to miss all the potholes in your town because they haven't fixed them in a long time.

[@daleallen7634]

@@basanistes359 : Bad news: We're already there!

[@thomasgirty6397]

and how will this work on a MOTORCYCLE ???? or will they ban bikes???

[@Fkay396912]

@@thomasgirty6397 Pre-2026 & Classic cars are about to Sky rocket in value . Huh? If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.

[@mudpuddle8805]

Benjamin Franklin once said: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

[@SAMSON12321]

You do realize that NO ONE ever gave up anything involving their rights, OUR RIGHTS ARE BEING FOCIBLY REMOVED UNDER THREATS OF ARREST/JAIL/MURDER... so please stop posting this claim...

[@winstonjohnson455]

@@SAMSON12321 It's each individual's choice, you either choose to exercise your "rights" or you choose not to. Government cannot take away your "rights", however, they can make you wish that you hadn't exercised them.

[@SAMSON12321]

@@winstonjohnson455 You have had so many of your rights taken away by the government it is not funny. Everything from PRIVACY to GUN OWNERSHIP to IDENTITY etc taken by way of executive orders/LIES/so called lawmakers. There is no end to the excuses being used to force you to take a Syringe full of dangerous chemicals due to a supposed pathogen. Laws about gender and sexual identity being passed to force people/children to accept someone elses sexual confusion, children subject to sexual talk/transition/adult behavior, Parents threatened to have their children taken from them if they complain or will not accept this alternate sex lifestyle etc

[@jeradblazek677]

​@@winstonjohnson455 Or sometimes make you regret exercising your rights....

[@carey_metv]

I have that bumper sticker on my jeep Liberty and am proud of it!

[@deedewockenfuss3889]

Not a freaking chance that I would submit to this kind of ABUSE. ALL of us need to stand up and REFUSE TO COMPLY with government officials who REFUSE TO COMPLY WITH THE CONSTITUTION.

[@fictitiousnightmares]

Do you have a cell phone? Then you already submit to this 'violation of privacy'. And you obviously have no clue what is and is not in the constitution or you wouldn't say ignorant inaccurate statements like that. Here is a little fact for you, just because you 'think' something is in the constitution or you 'think' you have a right does not make it true. Just like 'thinking' an election was stolen doesn't make it true. Facts matter in reality, believe it or not. And how exactly is implementing technology to prevent impaired driving (which is a privilege, not a right) ABUSE? LOL Such snowflakes I swear.

[@mfgreviews5028]

@@Itsmeandadd Unfortunately half the country will comply and happily support government overreach in the name of "saving democracy." The government is not the problem. The problem is half the country happily supports bigger government.

[@KM-wf9yx]

Amen! Hell No we won't do it, we will make them do it though! Oh all of this chit is going to be turned on these evil demons! It's going to be hysterical! Hella comedy for us to watch as they "Go to Jail, Go Directly To Jail! Do Not Pass Go, Do Not Collect $200.00 Dollars"! Let's send these Bastards to China, we do not want China in our country, if they want it, they go! Let's start shipping them off to China! Since when have we signed up to be China, We caught them selling our country to China, isn't this what this? No, no, no, no, no they don't!

[@tulw2728]

The seat belt laws had the very same reaction. But it has proven to have saved millions of lives and still continues saving lives. I support this bill a 100%. If you are drunk, you have just put yourself OUT OF SERVICE.🤠🤠🤠🤠. Neeeeeext!

[@helenbrooks4787]

Exactly, and that includes Covid Communist laws. The Covid crap worked so well, I would bet my car that there will be a new "disease" coming out between now, and the 2024 election.

[@handynothandsome261]

*My brother is an attorney in Maine, and I’ve warned him about what is happening re: social control and the digital cashless currency- and his reaction was an audible sneer, after which he told me it was all “bull snot,” and “none of that crap is actually happening,” like I’m a dumb ignorant kid.* *Not that it matters, but I’m an educated medical professional with two degrees- so his reply was stunning in its brazen arrogance and utter ignorance.* *I simply said “You seem quite certain- but if your “certainty” comes from what you see on TV, I suggest not watching ANY TV “news” any more, because it’s making you ignorant,” and I advised him to start opening his eyes (and his mind), and looking around a bit more.* *He won’t, of course.*

[@LTPottenger]

Our gov is owned by china and takes its orders from them.

[@toddnelson7324]

There are SO many, too many people who don't WANT to open their eyes and see what's really happening, they're too afraid of what they'll see

[@sammvoyager]

@handynoth I was told there's bounties being placed on Attorney's heads that hold to that creepy life draining mentality

[@efirce]

Until people push back on these criminals in charge, nothing will ever change.. this is nothing about drunk driver's, it's called surveillance..

[@shamaynygren8465]

Agreed. We The People have the power!!

[@tigerlily2941]

But I mean who wants to actually put forth the effort.

[@unclebobsoups8859]

Yes, probably another tactic to turn off our automobile if we exceed our allotted mileage.

[@Ayannah33]

Yup

[@tominmtnvw]

Ah, a whack job conspiracy theorist.

[@AltCoinInspector]

The deaths caused by drunk drivers are a much lesser concern than the complete demolition of our privacy and rights by insane politicians, bureaucrats, and authoritarians.

[@ablejohnson]

That's right, don't murder our freedom! Lol!

[@SheSoIndigo]

And they know that. This has nothing to do with dwi and everything to do with control 😒 when will they finally give us the label we are now. Communists...

[@Godwins47]

EXACTLY!! This is just beyond crazy insane!!!!!!

[@memyname1771]

The deaths caused by drunk drivers are a much lesser concern than my complete disregard for your right to life!

[@ashersdad1755]

Right or those same politicians letting killers out of prison early

[@RadioSilence-vs5hn]

We need to do a home and office inspection to look for under age kids trapped behind hidden walls or in basements. Also a audit of all their bank accounts. WE need to redistribute their excess money. NO POLITICIAN SHOULD EVER BE A MILLIONAIRE!! These crooks need an attitude adjustment.

[@jayrowe6473]

OK, let's do it.

[@danielstadden1149]

They're in the basement of the pizza parlor.

[@dianneestell6554]

You're one hundred percent correct

[@theclowninghasbegun3442]

​@@danielstadden1149or in a Disneyland dungeon

[@stephend9899]

Give me one minute in a cage ring with of these commie usurpers.

[@michaelanthony1797]

LYFT drivers taking drunk drivers home from bars will have to stop so that they are not penalized.

[@californiacavemandastardly6538]

I hope everyone protest this like they did Bud Light and Target.

[@Argonnosi]

How? If every new car sold in the United States from 2024 onward has these mechanisms built in, how do you protest them? How do you protest them in twenty years when these are the only cars available for majority purchase?

[@nicoleking772]

The time to protest was BEFORE the Democrap run House, Senate and WH PASSED this law. It is NOW law. Remember that in 2024

[@VeeTwoPointOh]

@@nicoleking772 this is republican shit stop lying

[@hoosierhyperwatch5884]

​@@nicoleking772 this can be taken to SCOTUS. It's unconstitutional.

[@alanblevens1104]

Argonnosi, the same way people protested Detroit in the 70’s, Which in turn prompted new laws to resolve the problems.

[@GunfighterOne]

What they fail to mention is unless you're a member of Congress, a family member of a member of Congress, a wealthy political donor - or otherwise politically well connected. It'll just be another law foisted upon the peasants of this land.

[@lornelthaltmer]

rules for thee but not for me

[@gabrielcontreras8754]

You mean the politicians like Nancy Pelopsi's husband?

[@ct7999]

Just disable the device and keep on going once the car is yours you can modify it, it’s not like it’s their car that they control what’s in it.

[@bnalive5077]

KTA

[@DozerfleetProd]

@@ct7999 : They'll make it illegal to tamper with those systems. "You will own nothing..." - Schwab

[@erocoptics5642]

It has nothing to do with drunk driving it's all about control

[@nickd.4512]

Its the same way for truck drivers. They moniter us all day everyday. Companies put cameras everywhere, its ridiculous

[@crspcritter]

Yup -

[@Fkay396912]

Not as an employee, as a Private Citizen--->If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.

[@merlin_XY]

What if the car pulls over to the side of the road on a road with no shoulder. Or the car stops when you are being tailgated or in heavy traffic, or going fast. This is crazy.

[@Fkay396912]

If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.

[@joshm3342]

My ignition cut out once just as I entered a long freeway bridge (no shoulder), but I coasted until I had a place to pull over. I was lucky.

[@christiansmith8618]

It’s a step by big brother that leads to the next step. I’ve driven vehicles with lane detection devices. They don’t recognize road construction, weather conditions, avoidance of potholes or debris. Thanks for the video

[@Hugh_Manitee]

All members of Congress should be required to have their tax records examined by IRS agents.

[@gmaninatrashcan7144]

Why would you think that the one agency with more guns than the Marines, that exclusively trains their door kickers to raid single family homes would ever investigate the people who gave them that power honestly?

[@basedsalty6970]

Starting with Nancy Pelosi

[@williamsporing1500]

Should be checked by private accountants, not another government agency

[@texasswade8453]

The FBI should be disbanded, if we want a free country.

[@hoosierhyperwatch5884]

Learn about public records. YOU can check that information.

[@starvethebeast6480]

Tyranny comes in many forms.

[@fictitiousnightmares]

Such tyranny! You realize driving is a privilege and not a right, correct? Also, learn what tyranny is because nothing about this even resembles tyranny. A bill was passed with majority votes and both parties involved in the process per our system of creating laws in the United States of America and it is affecting a privilege of Americans and not a basic human right or a Constitutional right for that matter. It is not unjust or oppressive government power, it is not handed down by a single ruler with absolute power, and it doesn't come from the office of someone with absolute power. English words have meaning and you should learn what those meanings are before using them or you may just expose how ignorant you are. The reason our country is so screwed right now is because of the lack of basic education like this and people becoming outraged and divided over shit that isn't true.

[@jefflilyea4669]

They need to check the Congress and Senate for drugs

[@kaseyd-ri4vg]

This is unreal. Thanks for sharing this power grab . The 4th amendment needs to stop this violation of privacy.

[@DerekDudage]

Our rights don't exercise themselves. We must exercise them for them to be applicable.

[@tylerbailey470]

The constitution is a piece of paper it cannot fight our fight it's a guideline for us to know where we and the government should stand it also reminds us we not only have the power but the duty to abolish tyrannical government. We have to fight that fight bot a piece of paper. If we dont get out of the mindset that we're just protected without doing it ourselves that piece of paper will be burned in our faces as if it has already. This government is tyrannical beyond repair now.

[@republicansthatdidntvotefo1605]

No need to stop the law. This law won't stop drunk driving.. Get your motorcycle license🤔

[@jonathanfitzpatrick3962]

​@@DerekDudage dam right

[@Squee_666_9]

​@@DerekDudage Exactly. Problem is most people won't and the government will make the lives of the small percentage that stands up hell.

[@clintmatthews3500]

Whether it's the War on Terror, the War on Drugs, or the War on Drunk Driving it's never actually about what they've declared war on. It's always about using that war to tighten the screws on the general populace.

[@baxterfarmandhomestead7481]

It’s the war on the people! The government has long ago declared war on us. Time for people to wake up and realize it!

[@krane15]

That "tightening of the screws" is the only thing these laws do for sure. All the rest is just theoretical. The War on Drugs was a dismal failure. But what it did do for sure was exponentially increase the number of illegal drugs, grow government and the criminal justice system (CJS). Today, our CJS is Big Business thanks almost exclusively to the War on Drugs. In fact, 2/3 of the people in our jails and prisons are there due to drugs and drug related charges. And all those in these industries thrived because of the WoD.

[@Fkay396912]

Euphemisms. It's a War on all of US! If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.

[@PatriotOne1]

I hope this law will be declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

[@hamptonlawfirm]

You and me both!

[@jaygee2995]

This country is becoming nazi Germany.....

[@JRBendixen]

It will not bc. It does not exist. He lied.

[@purebloodstevetungate5418]

@@JRBendixen Before typing you fact check yourself a simple search of the Bill would show you some facts. Since your lazy or stupid or both I did it for you. The policy is outlined in section 24220, titled "Advanced Impaired Driving Technology," starting on page 1,066. The policy dictates that within three years, the Secretary of the Department of Transportation, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, should do the following : "issue a final rule prescribing a Federal motor vehicle safety standard... that requires passenger motor vehicles manufactured after the effective date of that standard to be equipped with advanced drunk and impaired driving prevention technology." According to the bill, this technology should do the following: "Passively monitor the performance of a driver of a motor vehicle to accurately identify whether that driver may be impaired; and prevent or limit motor vehicle operation if an impairment is detected;" "Passively and accurately detect whether the blood alcohol concentration of a driver of a motor vehicle is equal to or greater than the blood alcohol concentration described in section 163(a) of title 23, United States Code; and prevent or limit motor vehicle operation if a blood alcohol concentration above the legal limit is detected." Or a combination of the two.

[@isaiahwelch8066]

​@@JRBendixen : It does exist. I have seen the legislation, and read what he talked about. Which is why I've said that people should simply not buy new cars after 2026.

[@dennistucker9081]

I greatly appreciate this video. This KZbin channel had presented information about this in another video, and it definitely caused me concern. Just so people don’t totally freak out, we do have consumer rights groups, which have often had to file lawsuits against even the government to preserve civil rights. Second, laws can be changed. I realize that takes a lot of work. Fortunately, we have many people in this country who are willing to do the work; thank goodness for them. It is time to support such organizations with our words and our dollars. I applaud the Hampton law firm for their concern.

[@LANGLADA15991]

How about we mandate that all elected officials and government employees must take a breathalyzer test at the start of work, after lunch and the end of their shift? Also, all elected officials must wear a bodycam at all times when they are working at any official level.

[@MetaGuideMedia]

And the body cam has to be live streamed 24/7 every second it's turned off they lose $1,000 towards their paycheck.

[@mikelfunderburk5912]

Piss test as well.

[@missmarya747]

And not tamper with the body cam.

[@michaelsinclair9391]

Yes that's a good ideal , they are no better than us

[@gfy2979]

No, I will just pray to God for their suffering

[@lvlndco]

We need some attorneys willing to work for the betterment of the country and challenge this crap in the courts ASAP!

[@Exxeron-ob3tv]

Hard to come by when the gov pays the other kind higher wages with your money.

[@writheinthedeepfry3859]

Sadly, attorneys are the problem. Over 300 members of congress are attorneys.

[@SteveWhiteDallas]

We need Donald Trump. We need 2% of the adult population to gather outside the Halls of Congress./ There is where we can have an effective, peaceful protest. Just 1% (of 160,000,000 adults) is 3.2 million people. All of Washington DC's 29 police forces + the entire National Guard (336,000) + Every single armed Law Enforcement Officer in the entire nation (

[@tylerbailey470]

This cannot be fixed within the system its corrupt beyond repair. We have to understamd that NOW before they get such an advantage that we cant so anything. They want our rifles badly why do they go after the guns that account for the least amount of deaths? Well thats because thos eare the guns we would use against them in combat The gov is poiring Chinese fighting age men across the border as we speak. Were in for a rude awakening.

[@steyraug96]

Attorneys, aka Lawyers, mispronunciation of LIARS, are not the solution. The law CREATED this mess. We won't get out of it through more laws... Your interpretation on how we WILL correct it.

[@anthonybrink287]

Imagine you are driving in cold weather and this thing decides you are drunk, pulls you over and will not allow you to start the car to use the heater. Insane.

[@thothheartmaat2833]

they say youre drunk if you had breathe mnts or orange juice or literally anything.. its insane..

[@godbyone]

Yes snow icy roads make the seem like you’re driving isn’t good and will shut u down in the blizzard

[@davidgates1122]

This may very well end up taking more lives than it saves.

[@chadwells7562]

@@davidgates1122 That’s not unusual at all, Congress critters aren’t smart enough to understand second order effects

[@cjporterfield1955]

​@godbyone we just will take the breathalyzer out immediately. Rednecks ain't gonna stand for this shit lol

[@larrybalderaz8864]

They must have been HAMMERED DRUNK when they came up with this law

[@101st_AB]

My very first call as an EMT was to an intersection where a driver had passed out at a red light. The local cops had the car surrounded. Just like you mentioned, the poor guy's breathing smelled like he'd been drinking, when in fact he was hyperglycemic. The really sad thing was the cops were disappointed!

[@gabriel4838]

SICK EVIL SOCIETY

[@letsdothis9063]

Yup. They get off on kidnapping.

[@evelynmahoney3569]

They get off even more on inflicting pain and suffering, beating people, tasering, torturing & killing. That's what they're all about.

[@memyname1771]

And, drinking or medical condition, the driver put other people at risk.

[@oceanbytez847]

you two have drank so much coolaid you should probably go touch grass now.

[@Llew70]

This absolutely sounds like a class action lawsuit all the way to the Supreme Court. I volunteer to be named vs US Govt. I took an oath joining the Army and when I was honorably discharged, no one said... oh by the way, your oath doesn't count anymore, so I say this is an absolute violation of my rights stated (not given) by the constitution. This cannot stand.

[@BrandonBuckaudioanarchy]

It's refreshing to encounter someone who recognizes that slips of paper don't grant rights. Your rights are yours from birth. Government can only honor or deny them. And the Constitution is nothing more than a short and incomplete list of them.

[@jeffdo9195]

Constitution grants rights. There is no such thing as " God given rights" if there was every person in every country would have the same rights

[@BrandonBuckaudioanarchy]

@@jeffdo9195 I never suggested anything about any god. Slips of paper don't grant anything. Human rights are yours at birth. Governments can only deny them or honor them. They cannot grant them. When some person or slip of paper grants another person the "right" to do a thing, that's a privilege, not a right.

[@jeffdo9195]

Ok what right do I have at birth that wasn't granted in the constitution?

[@poet7158]

This veteran supports your statements

[@scottberghorn]

The best way to fight this is active non compliance. There are always ways around everything. Sometimes breaking the law is the moral thing to do.

[@rpscorp9457]

Yeah, i can imagine an enterprising young engineer/programmer making a small fortune:)

[@jasmine2501]

Cars absolutely don't need any of this. Remove it

[@SexyThyme]

People will leave thier cars run while they drink.. i have to imagine some alcoholic hillbillies thought of this 30 years ago in some old pennsylvania holler town..

[@illusiveelk2558]

It's as simple as pulling the fuse.

[@bond1j89]

@@illusiveelk2558 Most likely it wont be that easy

[@JohnBash-o5l]

Simple solution. 1965 Pontiac GTO fully restored. Cost you around 80k better than a Tesla. No modern electronics

[@jeffreyshreve1277]

My last job had this system installed in all the vehicles. I was monitored and the car told me when I was going too fast or if I had to sudden stop. I had to deal with a camera watching me and another looking at the road. Every week I had to endure my boss laughing at me every time I swore in Klingon about the traffic. I was actually glad that they fired me because I blocked the camera. I am now happily retired and don't have to put up with that crap.

[@Fkay396912]

If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.

[@marshacole6865]

Anyone that wants to watch someone,, sit in traffic...NEEDS TO GET A LIFE OF HIS OWN..!!!

[@Jay-pw6xt]

We need to apply the same standards to congress. If they dont abide by thier oaths they need to be removed

[@tabuilder]

Who is it that makes that decision, the party in power, The President by executive order, or a Federal Judge? All are "politicians" whose first concern is to remain in power.

[@kurt1391]

I just laugh at people when they celebrate because Republicans win control. There isn't a shred of difference between the parties when it comes to civil liberties. Both want to collect as much data as possible on citizens and hand it over to the Government.

[@quan7umleap]

We live in the Ouroboros's world my friends...there's no way out till the end

[@bornfree3124]

Most don't have an oath, imposters.

[@cdrone4066]

I recommend a shock collar to be used every time they lie.

[@bozobebop5859]

Damn! This is next level, one step closer to 1984. Also, this guy is so damn well spoken lol, I hope I never need a lawyer, but if I did I hope they’re half as good as this dude

[@jayrowe6473]

And we so richly deserve to have our freedoms destroyed because of our laziness in preserving what our Founder fought for.

[@JohnSmith-cf4gn]

I still gotta go with Perry Mason.

[@garybulwinkle82]

@@jayrowe6473 Our mistake was allowing union women to educate our children!!!

[@Blah_Blah_Blaze]

Yea he speaks so clearly I can understand him at 2x speed lol

[@jessebrown233]

It's Russian mind f****** don't be a sucker.

[@bhinken]

Would the price of this added equipment be added to the price of the car being bought.If the person doesn't drink alcohol, why should they have to incur the cost of this equipment .

[@abigailbp9294]

What happens if you run into a sudden snowstorm or heavy rain? Do you sit on the side of the road and freeze to death? What if someone is in labor or having someone drive them to the hospital? This is insane. I'll keep my old car thank you.

[@JRBendixen]

Its bc he lied to you. Its not true.

[@justincase1575]

I’ll keep mine too !

[@justincase1575]

Government overreach at its finest!!!!! You can’t control people’s stupidity. Can’t tell that to politicians like Nancy!

[@cellphone7223]

@@JRBendixen Stop being a troll lildixen.......

[@fifthward1983]

@@JRBendixen it is true , you are just ignorant. probably a democrat, they use the head in the sand ignorance plea.

[@BisonWilliam]

Places like Wyoming have extreme weather conditions. High winds and blizzards with little to no advanced notice, and all of this in a mostly rural environment. A person can be driving along I-80, at 80 MPH, and be hit with a 60 MPH gust of wind. That gust will cause you swerve and have to work to maintain your lane. Will this system recognize that as a deviation from normal driving behavior and shut your vehicle down? What happens if a person gets their vehicle shut down in a rural area without cell service during freezing temps? There are lots of variables that I doubt any of these "officials" have taken into account.

[@tin2001]

Wildlife running into the road or roads with poor maintenance would also trigger a system that bases things on "erratic" driving. Or dirt roads. Dirt roads do all sorts of strange things to car systems designed by city people who've never seen dirt roads. My Hyundai i20 ABS and traction control go mental on dirt roads. Traction control I can just turn off, but ABS has caused some scares when braking simply stops working (until you force the pedal down harder).

[@bananonymouslastname5693]

I honestly have no idea where to start to fight this. Write my congressman who voted for it? My voice as a constituent is muted. I already voted the other way, and it didn't matter. The fact that this isn't on the news is absurd. Why do I have to find out from a lawyer on KZbin when the government is invading my privacy and taking away my rights?

[@jessicablack300]

Exactly. In my opinion they should be required to inform the entire public of the USA in a very public way when this stuff is first proposed. Before it's actually decided on.

[@memesbyme710]

You can try writing if you prefer. However, only about fifty percent of them will actually read your letter and have a response. Call and leave a message instead. They're not gonna answer the phone either. It's very rare that you talk to any of them but it does happen.

[@garretlewis4103]

Because all too many in Washington want control and see us as subjects, not citizens.

[@Pleasiotic1]

Because they know its going to get national pushback.

[@The_Noble_Prince]

Someone's about to get red pilled about the media XD

[@billbarham9401]

Make it a law for every politician and bureaucrat to be monitored 24/7/365 and that information to be published daily for yhe American public to see. How far do you think that will go. It will be the standard " Laws for Thee but Not for Me" !

[@paulwolf8444]

Tyranny always starts with your safety.

[@Ash_95]

Well said.

[@johnbante5594]

Very true

[@Fkay396912]

If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.

[@trainman70005]

I SEE TONS OF LAWSUITS COMING WITH THIS

[@thegamersconclave8709]

Its a Federal Regulation, you as a Citizen, do not get to oppose such a mandate. Its like the Masks, either you do it, or there will be consequences.

[@thermalreboot]

This has to be a violation of both the 4th and 5th amendments. It's certainly a violation of the 9th and 10th.

[@kurt1391]

Most of our laws violate the 9th and 10th. The Constitution is just words if no one takes it seriously.

[@nobody1841]

What could be more private than what goes in and out of our body? Unreasonable...secure in our person's...

[@douglashoward9616]

I've seen three videos where the police openly say. We don't go by that document since 9 1 1. Which is motive.

[@nobody1841]

@@douglashoward9616 that doc (NDAA) does make we the people enemies of the gov. The reps in gov continue to renew it. Pretty much all anyone needs to know.

[@moeheil8839]

The sales of pre requirement cars are gonna skyrocket

[@bamahama707]

Such a law would be illegal and unconstitutional.

[@jameswest9261]

You are guilty until you prove your innocence.

[@maxwellcrazycat9204]

They don't care.

[@Ivan-pl2it]

It is!

[@jakekot1351]

Try doing something about it...pulling teeth as by 2030 "you will own nothing & be happy".

[@Squidbush8563]

That's not stopping them from passing their tyrannical laws that are "for your own good"

[@blong7635]

50% of these items have been installed and in use daily in commercial vehicles for several years now and they malfunction often. It's nice to see the rest of the public concerned about it now that it would affect them. Fight it for sure.

[@evildaddysteve]

Brad, most people are completely unaware of the incremental erosion of our freedoms. It would take a revolution to get our rights restored. There are too many sheeples that will just submit.

[@jayrowe6473]

The rest of the public isn't even slightly concerned. Slothful Americans continue to sleep comfortably inside their cozy little bubble of perceived freedom.

[@BuckEtheAlien]

This needs to go before court before it's even implemented. This is absolutely unconstitutional, not to mention irritating.

[@ChicagoJimmy420]

Hello ,, This became Law a few years ago, It will be mandatory by 2024 or 2026 ,

[@KeweenawPatriot]

Next they'll say they need cameras everywhere on/in your property to stop domestic violence.

[@desireegoulett69]

Go before a corrupted court that isn't interested in protecting rights or individual liberties. The other part of ROE vs WADE was EVERYONE LOST THEIR RIGHT TO PRIVACY....this is clearly a privacy isssue, that in large part has already been vacated.....a right lost or oprression of Anyone is rights lost and oppression of Everyone.

[@MartenKrueger-sx4me]

This is too be implemented January 1st in all new 2025 vehicles....this was the latest I heard ...it was passed in a bill bundle, by Democrats and Republicans...

[@MartenKrueger-sx4me]

​@@desireegoulett69 You are on the wrong, line here ,not talking about taking of life! ....this is about freedom of travel!

[@JimDegenhart]

True bull it. Our congress will want out of this.

[@rondayoung4350]

Leaving women stranded on the side of the road is really safe. How many law suits can come from that. How many people will get murdered because of this? It's insane.

[@RonSafreed]

Ronda, they know how dangerous & communistic/big-brother watching you on the road from point A to point B really is!!

[@maxxcarver5502]

.Things like this will make it a lot easier to rob people. They already have cars that do automatic breaking when something is front of them. The quote on quote peaceful protesters loved that in cars ! Lots of people got robbed because their car wouldn't move!!!

[@Fkay396912]

If they could put a "cop" in your car 24/7, is that Constitutional? In case you committed a crime? That is a blatant 4th Amendment Violation.