DIY Biohacking: Do(n’t) Try This at Home

[@freethink]

Should biohacking be enabled or restricted?

[@yuvalperry6688]

I think it should be regulated and licenced

[@arunyadav_96]

Offcoarse right now it should be strictly restricted. I believe you would never give a gun to a 8 year old. Would you..

[@MT-dh5mw]

arun yadav lucky his not an 8 year old right!

[@MT-dh5mw]

If you Google his info he is an accredited scientist. He seems pretty cool and apperantly knows what he is doing. I see no reason why he can't capitalize on his research. We will see in a few years what promises or problems manifest.

[@arunyadav_96]

@@MT-dh5mw yeah but what he is selling right now can be bought bought by anyone.

[@epicinstrumentalmusic7967]

"You always imagine that doctors will be there for you, or scientists will be there for you, or somebody will be there for you. But, a lot of times it's just not the case"...... "Be your own hope"! Very well said!

[@pixelperfectpravin]

Got tears in my eyes

[@quintuple_lained]

He is entirely right, I'm currently forced to biohack my body with hormones because my countries medical system is gatekeeping me from getting them the official way

[@michaelhansen9403]

No one is coming, it’s up to us.

[@theHUMANAUT1]

The big thing is...this tech WILL be used. We just need to make sure it's available to everyone not just elites and rich

[@RealestDave]

The enlightened elites have probably have had access to this for decades.

[@ooooneeee]

That's the problem with every new tech pretty much. Access for poor people who may actually need it the most is often low.

[@pablovaldes2397]

finally I can use my money to get giga-chad genetics, and those poor people said you have to work for your body's physique, HAHA

[@jesseyemichell7610]

Vaccines.

[@dontfeelcold]

@@jesseyemichell7610 cool story bro

[@fritzdeuces]

Dude's got a phd, worked for NASA. That's not ur regular DIYer. I feel like he may be qualified.

[@unlockwithjsr]

You don't need a PHD to use CRISPR

[@CommonCentsRob]

Yeah, now anyone can take a common germ or virus and turn in into a useful ultra-communicable, biological warfare agent. Good idea... real good idea.

[@carsonhunt4642]

CommonCentsRob Same way free speech was dangerous and always controlled, the public is and can be stupid, and should be controlled just by the top? It’s tough cuz I agree the masses are so insanely stupid. But at the same time I don’t think mass control is good, kills innovation.

[@CommonCentsRob]

@@carsonhunt4642 What are you going on about? Free speech is dangerous? Only to the simple minded who make it obvious they can't defend their views. You think tinkering with deadly viruses by the general public is 'innovation'? Wow. How is my statement wrong or false?

[@carsonhunt4642]

CommonCentsRob The simple minded don’t have their own views. They’re just the sheep. Cnn argues twitter should be banned because people can read “dangerous” things themselves on it, as opposed to just hearing what they’re supposed to hear.. Free speech was never allowed in past history because it “could” cause trouble. My sarcasm about free speech is the same issue you have with crispr. Same argument applies to near any technology actually. Crispr is about the entirety of the human genome, not about viruses. The same way computers are about a million things. Could a bad egg make a bad virus on the computer with ill intent? Could someone use free speech to radicalize a small minority such as a cult? Despite the risks the benefits have always outweigh the cons.

[@astrovicis]

You guys remember when this guy replaced his entire G.I. microbiome because it was failing him?? The man’s a legend and an inspiration. His philosophy on self-healing and his approach to science are absolutely nothing to be in up in arms about.

[@astrovicis]

Rick Mortar what fundamental knowledge of genetic engineering is he lacking?

[@apurvitanna]

@UCDFwNJrMGX0mQmsmZLwQFYQ He's already done similar stuff for NASA

[@somerandommen]

​@Rick Mortar Pretty sure he worked for NASA trying to modify Earth life so that is survives in a Simulacrum of Mars. They wouldn't keep him on for years if you were right.

[@howtoguro]

@Rick Mortar I don't care if he was some shleb who didn't know anything. It's his body and his choice and risk to take.

[@DavidGalvanwiz]

@Rick Mortar and you are...?

[@megan8494]

I love how people are concerned about "bad stuff happening" when cigarettes and alcohol are legal 🫠. Makes sense.

[@Kramerica962]

Not to mention the long lasting effects of all these chemicals they scientists came up with that are pumped into the air and atmosphere on a daily basis. They find new chemicals and plastics in newly born babies everyday. Scientists love to pretend like they are so noble and "safe" yet scientists are responsible for some of the worst destruction this planet has ever seen. Some guy in a white lab coat had no problem creating Agent Orange for the government knowing full well what it would be used for.

[@khuldoonaziz6406]

That is dangerous but then that's how man learnt to light a fire....

[@freethink]

Good point! A lot of progress has come with great risk - and you can get burned literally or figuratively.

[@arunyadav_96]

Yes but once you know the potential of the Fire. You wouldn't light fire near gasoline.

[@rachelalan07]

@@R1L1. Fire and Biohacking are highly different but at the base level, humans took a risk and experimented with something may people warned them against. Sure, bad things happened. But we wouldn't be here without fire. And we are more advanced now so we can try to limit the ill effects.

[@kaorumugen991]

Forks are dangerous if you jam them into your eyeballs, doesn't mean forks should be outlawed. Also, we're all going to die anyway, so... simply living is the most dangerous thing you can do, because it has a 100% chance of resulting in death. Might as well try to accomplish something positive in the meantime.

[@choyoobin]

Using DIY CRISPR to change one or a few specific genes in your DNA (to change a trait about you) is easy in theory, but incredibly difficult in practice. There's a reason why most single gene disorders don't have CRISPR-based treatments yet - it's not only difficult to DELIVER the CRISPR system reliably to your DNA to get a desired effect, but we also don't know about all the downstream and long term effects. Imo its quite important to know how complicated genetics is and those who don't understand this should stay away from DIY CRISPR. Open to discussion :)

[@noslengashi1390]

I'm trying to follow up on his condition at the moment. But there's little to non information

[@Wyrm-xp5le]

if crispr can’t even cure a single gene disease then it means it deosn’t work

[@mtcondie]

I got a DIY crispr kit and I was successfully able to engineer Lymphoma. 10/10, Do not recommend.

[@mr_p950]

i will test on myself soon and i will give the feedback

[@gre3nishsinx0Rgold4]

I think what that dope dude was saying and what Odin is doing is for a noble cause. Also I agree that having a select few that are rich and powerful, and in the most top of the top elites having the only access to something life saving is not a great thing.

[@freethink]

Cool, thanks for commenting! It's interesting to see the reaction in the comments vs our other videos. When we post videos about an innovative, lifesaving technology we often get comments like "but it'll only help the rich and powerful," or "it won't happen for too many years." This is the other end of the spectrum - enabling anyone to potentially get access to very advanced therapies for cheap - but we also see a lot of pushback, with people saying it's dangerous and should be illegal. Perhaps the right answer is somewhere in the middle, as Zayner himself acknowledges, but he seems to see his role as pushing things back towards the cheap/accessible end of the spectrum.

[@theobserver9131]

Maybe we should let anyone who wants to, play with highly radioactive materials too! I'm sure someone will come up with something fascinating and useful! Imagine someone trying to rob your house in the middle of the night, and you could just nuke them! That would be great.

[@tenminutetokyo2643]

I biohack every day via a dozen Krispy Kreme donuts.

[@freethink]

A brute force biohack.

[@icarokaue7334]

crispr kreme

[@uwu-sd4sf]

@@icarokaue7334 it’s illegal that no one’s liking your comment

[@johnjacobjingleheimerschmi2895]

​@@icarokaue7334 The fact that so few have seen this comment thread is proof that there is no justice in this world

[@onlyswedishmeatballs1677]

DKM😂

[@echoliu8671]

I do really like this man. It seems he was trying to save many people's life. I hope he can keep doing what he want. Medical companies must hate him, the profits they want sounds really too much.

[@Zonydeep]

Probably too incompetent to actually hurt himself

[@davidhendersonii221]

@@Zonydeepcorny

[@workinalday4351]

Designer babies would be cool. Make them glow in the dark for the 1st few years of their life so you know where they are, you can save on night lights! Maybe make them bounce so they don't get hurt when they fall. You know the basic stuff!

[@_anthrax101_5]

uhhhh I mean I'm super supportive of genetic engineering but I think designer babies are a pretty unethical concept. IMO it should only be the choice of grown adults to genetically modify themselves.

[@carl3693]

Bouncy-ball babies

[@420roachdoggjr]

Give them 8 eyes so they can see all around them and make their fingers 3 times as long for optimal holding! You know the basic stuff!

[@siladarpasha5613]

Lol dude. You made my day.

[@siladarpasha5613]

Give them spider powers. The future web warriors.

[@imacuser101]

This dude is the business! They should be pushing this tech, getting more people involved! Amazing stuff!

[@mitarravilic2025]

This should be supported for small scale stuff like targeting enzymes. Thought Emporium on youtube already cured himself of severe lactose intolerance using this tech. Imagine for instance, editing genes so you can fully digest cellulose, making any leaf a calorie rich meal.

[@kuldeepsharma8982]

This channel always put something interesting and totally different than normal thinking

[@01020m]

I love this guy for no reason at all

[@brandonholloway69]

“Be your own hope”…. I agree with that statement 100%

[@tainicon4639]

I totally agree with this guys message... but the mistakes made by the narrator in describing this technology (zero judgment or criticism from me you guys did a decent job compared to a lot of science journalism) do highlight the reason why science is elitist. It’s not that the information is necessarily locked away (it is...) but that it it sufficiently complicated that you can’t really understand it without training. Also... He most likely did not transfer himself with the CRISPR construct he made... if I remember correctly he did not load it into a virus. So even if his chemical transfection method worked it probably had an undetectable change in the gene.

[@mr.normalguy69]

Remember kids, the government loves you very much, knows what's best for you and is using your money very efficiently.

[@XantheFIN]

F-35 program went efficiently.

[@mr.normalguy69]

@@XantheFIN Yup, Lockheed Martin is definitely government owned. And so is SpaceX.

[@XantheFIN]

@@mr.normalguy69 You know i referred to F35 program and not to company doing work.. Company was contracted do it. Not by themself. Company didn't or never does paying things for other one out of own pockets more than needed to get buyers. Welcome to industry world kiddo.

[@mr.normalguy69]

@@XantheFIN Government is the demand, F-35 program is the supply that won the competion for a 5th gen multirole stealth airctaft. There was a demand from a customer thus, it was responded with private solution. Welcome to economics.

[@XantheFIN]

@@mr.normalguy69 Nevermind lol.

[@arunyadav_96]

This is very informative. Thank you freethink team for this. Love your stuff.♥

[@Biomeducated]

Agreed!

[@freethink]

Appreciate it! Thanks for watching!

[@arunyadav_96]

@@freethink could you please do a video on Thorium Nuclear Reactors and Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)

[@imanekourati7990]

I like this guy soo much, please let him know that 😂

[@somerandommen]

@Rick Mortar I feel that's what most people say about you...

[@servanttofriend8481]

Me too.

[@rohlay00]

@Rick Mortar addressing the random "idiot" as an idiot is proof that you do care what he thinks about you, because you were upset and called him an idiot. If you weren't outraged in the slightest bit you would not have expressed those emotions.

[@Jack_The_Loser_Loner]

I don’t care about the risks there might be. I would rather die instead of failing. I will go through anything to achieve my goal. There is no possibility of failure because I can’t fail. It’s not me just not wanting to fail, it’s me not being able to fail. Failure is not an option. I will do whatever it takes.

[@Jack_The_Loser_Loner]

If there is bad grammar and bad punctuation deal with it if there is something you don’t understand ask

[@AndrewSlacks]

SKEPTICAL PERSPECTIVE AHEAD: I understand (and personally agree with) the perspective that the FRUITS of this technology should be available to everyone regardless of race, gender identity, religion, sex, creed, social class, etc. That being said, I have a significant issue with the idea that the tools to edit the genome of an organism should be made available to anyone who wants it. CRISPR is in its infancy, it is already incredibly capable and nobody knows how much more capable and easy to use it will be in the future. It is currently within the realm of capability to genetically modify a deadly bacteria/virus and destroy humanity at a large scale. I don't think it's in our best interest to make such a powerful tool readily available. You're required to register your car, register firearms, register heavy machinery, boats, anything that can do damage. I believe every positive application of this technology should be equally available to anyone who needs/wants it, but open access is a recipe for disaster.

[@berkeuslu]

I think he has some solid points. If we have a chance to prevent any disease or all of them so far we know. We should try that

[@freethink]

Glad you liked it! Time will tell...

[@malachigrindle7063]

When John Oliver says you're wrong, you're probably on the right track.

[@sashanealand8315]

this is what we have to do until "public" universities in the US are public again. Right now "science" is only accessable to those who can ace standardized tests and pony up $30k + a years tuition to look at ppt slides. There are a lot of innovative people out there that just want to do hands on science without the bureaucracy, elitism and high pricetag of a university.

[@sithembilexulu2522]

seems like capitalism is the true villain

[@Zonydeep]

Good luck

[@astrovicis]

It’s not just self experimentation that I think Josiah is encouraging...it’s also “a valuable exercise in citizen science” ok they just said it

[@Aika_PDNW]

"We are doing everything for noble cause, our technology would save the world. I tried to make a statement abot how rich get all the medicine and wanted to popularize it. For people's sake... Did i say that we are gonna save the world?" Describe tech, don't describe how important and influential it is.

[@CicadasFly]

Im 100% modifying myself into a super villain..

[@silvermcgallon]

Looking at this production quality, the view count always surprises me. Hopeful that the algorithm will smile upon the channel soon.

[@chimedemon]

Please no...

[@melody3741]

Finally something actually useful instead of just nfc chips that function the same taped on your hand as they do inside your hand

[@chthulu27]

I think he makes some valid arguments. I do think the risk is potentially high, but historically there have always been big risk takers that have made big breakthroughs. It's hard to say what's right here and i think that anyone who says it's easy to declare authoritatively one way or the other are selling something.

[@elinope4745]

I hope to get into this. This is next level self improvement.

[@paulpantea9521]

I remember this guy from Unnatural Selection on Netflix.

[@toasteduranium]

Paul Pantea He reminds me of Rami Malek

[@Biomeducated]

Indeed!

[@MT-dh5mw]

Ooh wow

[@sebastiand1816]

I think I will continue to watch it now.

[@GP-wu1eu]

Imagine all of the underground biohacking thats happening as were watching this

[@hiltonkuykendall9375]

Way more than you imagine. Thankfully, that process is going to no longer be an option in less than a year. Unless you know how to mix poison. Glad I did my bio hacks already for the most part.

[@bletz5732]

Imagine how many involuntary bio hacking experiments are taking place

[@icarus387]

@@hiltonkuykendall9375 How do you get into biohacking? It seems like a really interesting emerging field in the future and I want to learn how to manipulate these tools.

[@castaway3715]

@@icarus387 same

[@fouadmas5413]

2021 world wide MRNA roll out ???

[@panama-canada]

Your body your choice!

[@green8026]

It's not obvious which is the better choice, but my hunch is that it is GOOD that it is available to the public. The bureaucratic pipeline surrounding pharmaceuticals, therapeutics, and the FDA takes way too long, sometimes for good reason and sometimes for not so good reason. Regulations regarding participating in human trials VOLUNTARILY creates many scenarios where people dying of cancers, neurodegenerative diseases, various genetic disorders (like the neurodegenerative Huntington's disease) just have to sit and wait with crossed fingers for a new drug that shows promise to take 5 years to see if 100 people or whatever are positively influenced. The people that will die from this will be few relative to the people constantly dying because of the bureaucracy of the 'official' pipeline. I'm not saying down with regulations, I'm just saying it should be the biggest priority in the world to reduce those regulations to the bare minimum possible to still allow for a high degree of safety. not to mention it creates an opportunity for bioengineering garage startups, something not really possible back in the day; software was the only garage entrepreneurship for the most part that anyone could do. 3d printers made manufacturing and engineering startups possible. and this makes bioengineering startups with a very very very small budget possible. I'm not saying bioengineers using diy crispr kits should be immediately injecting people, I'm saying it seems like a GREAT thing that they could do experiments on live cells and things like that in a petri dish.

[@robgoins3672]

My body, my choice right? Except for when you can’t control the narrative…

[@adventurousloner]

KZbin's algorithm slipped with this vid. This should've been in my recommended. People doing to their bodies what they do their PCs. Yes. Certainly. Science is for everyone. Do not continue to let others create our perception of reality.

[@arzoo_singh]

Too good man . But ,there is problem gene editing is complex and could have undesired consequence . So we should also have tools and mechanism to counter this .

[@benmcreynolds8581]

I'm so okay for Making science so much more available for independent passionate people. I find the current structure of science and control, holding back so much. Science should be happy because it's all just free research for them that "they don't have to be responsible for but can benefit from learning from the outcomes" so imagine human trials, where they don't have to be responsible and still gather insight from? They should love that. It's not going to stop big companies to continue to make Profits. They will always find ways, so idk why they have such a freak out reaction over anything that thinks outside the box...

[@MawoDuffer]

You can bioengineer a short term solution to lactose intolerance. Someone on KZbin did it with genetically modified yeast. Why isn’t this a big thing?

[@Eclyptical]

5:57 I think the Jurassic Park shirt is a little on the nose lol

[@biohackshq4072]

Thanks for the vid! So much to learn about biohacking…currently exploring nutrigenomics, DIY biology, and grinder.

[@ozerune]

We wouldn’t have cars if they were banned due to crashes

[@Zonydeep]

No cars would be a good thing. Hard to imagine since we've been brainwashed by the oil and auto industries.

[@justsomeguy4935]

I think that the scariest thing is that most people won’t have access to (or even care about) disposing their waste properly and there is no way of knowing what kind of effect that could have on the environment. Not to mention intentionally malicious actors who would try and make something to actively harm other people.

[@brettkercher934]

It’s really scary to think about that. I work with Environmental Health and Safety for the research lab I’m at and some of the things the commonly used chemicals can do to the environment is crazy.

[@lukapopovic7956]

It's not always 100% accurate in labs, that's why it's dangerous to even try it in garage

[@marypatten9655]

it is all about being able to make personal choices concerning your own health. remember. it is not what your dr knows that will kill you. it is what he does not know. ie. people with diabeties should not take hot showers or baths. look it up for your self. how many of you with high blood sugar were told about how not to use hot water while bathing?

[@ronnieye7185]

Actually, it’s also illegal in China, that doctor He was sentenced to three years' imprisonment then.

[@zeziliu8493]

This is the truth!

[@Taahmim]

Its really hurt to see only 500k people subscriber for a quality channel which deserve 5m atleast.

[@Pianodaddyy]

People only care about what the media tells them to

[@Pianodaddyy]

I’m sorry, most people lol

[@me_TJ_MrB]

I am just speaking off the top of my head here, but if someone will inject themselves with Black Tar Heroin and roll the dice to die then why not use your brain and body to educate yourself instead. At least this may give you a new love of science and an understanding of the human or the genome that could lead you to a new and productive use of the mind. Not saying go out and try it but if you are about to throw your life away, then at least use it for good.

[@CatDribble]

Great art comes from taking drugs... And so does bad stuff, but people still do it

[@Astech31]

Of course editing your dna can be dangerous…. now here’s your Covid booster 😂😂

[@TheStrangerSpeaks10]

Lol, anybody else notice one of the gals wearing a Jurassic park t-shirt?

[@freethink]

We'd make a joke, but there are people using genetics to try and recreate dinosaurs: kzbin.info/www/bejne/b2jVkqSjbNh4esk

[@TheStrangerSpeaks10]

Freethink “Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could...”

[@TheStrangerSpeaks10]

Freethink The endless struggle between Walt Disney’s views on technology and Mary Shelley’s.

[@dobysaurus]

USA banned CRISPR embryo editing but GM food is legal.

[@lovewenwin]

It went clear over my head, the point that is. Directly over my head.

[@pentegarn1]

The Holy Grail.....the Elixir of Life. The Philosopher's Stone.

[@jacksonmowell3859]

Could you get rid of ADHD with Biohacking?

[@peteratwood6691]

It's good that he's trying to spread it among everyone. It's just that we know so little about what DNA does that changing it can potentially mess you up. Hope people are aware when they buy from him

[@jorgerascon1212]

This is a dangerous premise.

[@chimedemon]

It’s also very idiotic

[@connorshaw-case6030]

one step closer to my army of wasp/spider/rats

[@biohackshq4072]

Biohacking can be described as citizen or do-it-yourself biology. For many “biohackers,” this consists of making small, incremental diet or lifestyle changes to make small improvements in your health and well-being.

[@CatDribble]

We use phones, cars and computers, now everyone tell me how it works :P

[@defeatSpace]

My god, be careful people, for yourselves and the public.

[@Josh-nc6nt]

LMAO!!! Megan Hochstrasser's eye brow HAHAHHAHHH

[@AniMesuro]

What an absolute chad.

[@remy7663]

this guy is such a nerd, i love it

[@Boogra]

Given the absolute shitshow that was the medical establishment over the last three years, I'll take this guy's approach any day. Think on it this way: if the current attitude of the medical establishment was in place in the 1800s, we'd still be back in the 1800s.

[@nicholasfevelo3041]

You can be smart and not wise. Thats this guy. CRISPR still creates unanticipated effects especially with epigenetic traits where many genes work together.

[@nicholasfevelo3041]

@Rick Mortar thousands of years ago this guy would have been the first to try new mushrooms before anyone else in the clan, then die

[@vaisakh_km]

I just saw iron man, and this feels like that

[@unlockwithjsr]

Imaging if Biohacking would have been available even before the Covid-19 pandemic, possibly it could be easier for communities to cure their ill or make themselves immune to the virus before they get it...

[@socrates_the_great6209]

Lol. You dont know what you are talking about!

[@bradleytrudeau630]

There injecting you with crisper and you don’t even know it

[@jarate5922]

or maybe they could stop being lazy fat ass slobs and start getting healthy yknow

[@enigma-minecraftmysteries5001]

@@socrates_the_great6209 honestly I'm not sure I understand, but I think he was saying that maybe by genetically modifying the cells of the immune system we could do something to defeat the virus.... I don't know bro.. I didn't understand what he said. But that's okay, he has his own idea (I think).

[@planefan082]

@@enigma-minecraftmysteries5001 I'm about 90% sure that this person is describing mRNA vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna, etc), which aren't new but simply didn't have a practical use where traditional vaccines didn't work until COVID

[@heeckypi01]

Long time ago, we have people unable to read and write. Mostly elitist and rich people were the ones able to. It’s also deemed dangerous for people of the lower class to have this knowledge. Yes, nowadays many false informations are spread, conspiracies theories going on etc. But is the world really a better place without more people being able to read or write? I think this is a good comparison to what he’s trying to convey.

[@wendilandkammer8368]

Just because you can, does that mean you should? That's the question. The problem with giving open access to technology to the masses is that not everyone has a degree in biometrics or genetic engineering or even a basic understanding of sometimes things go horribly wrong that there is no fixing. Having freedom of choice to do anything to themselves as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else sounds great, on paper. But where we are right now I have no faith in humans being willing to accept responsibility for actions they take without trying to blame someone else when things don't go like what looks good on paper. The evidence for that is everywhere. Even if there was a book size consent form written by the best and most knowledgeable lawyers in the world that stated that a person using the technology accepted full responsibility with out reservation, there would be inevitable lawsuits aimed at finding loopholes because the bottom line is when things don't go the way the want and expectation says it should people just don't want to take responsibilty for their actions. In a hundred years maybe or maybe in a thousand years, but not now.

[@treefrog123a]

Give men back their hair

[@oneandonlymoth]

…okay but what did he actually do when he injected himself? What was he trying to do? I feel like that’s a super important part of the story here.

[@Zonydeep]

Science is complicated because biology is complicated.

[@Being_On_Fire]

i love you josiah bro!! i solute your thoughts!!

[@AymenDZA]

this guy is Clovis Bray in the making !

[@Patrick0900]

Thanks!

[@freethink]

You're welcome, sorry we are just seeing this now! You can email me at [e-mail] and we'll send you a thank you gift!

[@bordeux9126]

Well, not everyone. Most people can access it but it need to be control. Once you have the correct sequence for certain virus or bacteria, you can replicate it and then possibly spread either to an individual or a whole country.

[@niceday2015]

in China it is also illegal

[@chandrasekharlimit4547]

Little skeptic because his attitude, I’d have to do more research myself before coming near it lol

[@brainstormchannelbc1981]

Interesting.. Knowledge is the key New sub

[@calllus9397]

Doing this hurts the field itself by showing such recklessness

[@ItchyKneeSon]

I had no idea Ed Bassmaster has a PhD and worked at NASA. Neat.

[@pouncerminned863]

"would ya look at that? Just look at it!"

[@toasteduranium]

3:32 that lady’s mask didn’t cover her nose what’s the point Also second

[@PizzaGoat323]

She has the cold so her nose is blocked

[@blasttrash]

these days everyone is an expert at masks lol 😂

[@syriuszb8611]

The problem is not with science, the problem is with being restricted hard with anti GMO laws and anti GMO propaganda. Only big corporations profit from those laws and propaganda, since only they can afford to do it: research, grow and scale up. And even if small laboratories achieve something great with this, they are basically blocked by law and stigma. I remember when there was a great bandage created in my country, bandages from flax seeds that could heal wounds that couldn't be healed otherwise, and healed it really fast. TV stations first promoted it, to show how it was great, then lamented, that no one wanted to help to produce it at scale. About same time they attacked fiercely GMO corn and roundup*, manipulating what farmer that talked about it was saying and were saying so much per hectare of the herbicide was used, the farmer wouldn't even break even if it was true. And some time ago I saw, that what they didn't say about that miracle bandage was that it was GMO. And that was the reason no one agreed to work with the researches to mass produce them. For years researches were trying to breed naturally what they had for years, just not GMO. And the GMO version had probably less random mutations than the "natural breed" and probably still is much better at the job than "natural". What TV station did reflects what people say, and I met people who say that our contry kills our inventions, like with the bandages, and are also strongly against GMO. *While I have no idea whether the roundup is bad for environment and our health, the fact still is that it was manipulation.

[@stefanobutelli3588]

9 mins and you don’t tell me what he used crispr on himself for?

[@小伙子真带劲]

As a Chinese I can tell u edit DNA on human is illegal and that guy already went to jail.

[@listenhere2006]

he is an artist

[@tiebeetroottk8501]

Reminds me of that time I was forced to take a vaccine so could get a job or buy food or go outside my house. Good times

[@savagesam43]

I HECKIN LOVE SCIENCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

[@nikkimae813]

If he wants to do it on himself, fair enough. I wouldn't buy a kit from him to do experiments on myself, I'd buy some weed from him though 😂

[@hotbxdkitty969]

you just know he grows it or helps grow it

[@spaeseas.viz7]

he bout to be the first ripper doc

[@AtticusDenzil]

This guy is a true hero!

[@Pianodaddyy]

It’s a shame more people don’t realize this!!

[@lighteningnewspodcast]

tech should be accessible to anyone

[@basher92]

oh i know a biohack! its called EATING lol

[@AlphaHealthYT]

In the United States, germline gene editing is not explicitly illegal under federal law.

[@FunNFury]

I like this guy already...

[@saskuroo]

He's soooooooooooo dope

[@freethink]

Haha, will let him know, thanks for the heads up :)