Panasonic 70-200mm f4 Lens Review | Is it WORTH IT?

[@joshuatatro4503]

No need to hate on the tripod collar. F/4 and 70-200mm is great for landscape use, and it's way easier to mount/balance that camera/lens combo on a tripod with a collar in that use case. Focus clutch with real stops in manual mode is nice, too. Agreed the price is bonkers, though.

[@federicosabbatanischiuma1836]

I really like your videos.. but I don’t understand why you think that f4 lenses are not professional. There are a lot of professionals that don’t need f2.8 at all (like landscape photographers)... it doesn’t mean that who does not use 2.8 or wider lenses is not a pro

[@JordanCS13]

Indeed. Also, the tripod collar is very useful for tripod mounted work, as you'd expect....not everyone shoots portraits and events only.

[@fotochips5300]

Federico Sabbatani It is hard to title the lens with f2.8 if f4 already occupied that title

[@orphanuprising]

I do mostly landscapes and I'd still prefer my lenses be capable of wider apertures, especially at that price. Its just a general rule, that the more you spend, the wider the aperture, because it costs more to manufacture a lens with more glass in it. Pumping up the price on an f4 just doesn't quite make sense.

[@FrankDiNardi]

The L mount ALLIANCE!!!!! Freaking love it. I remember the Raw Talk when they first said it and was laughing my ass off!!

[@JohnDrummondPhoto]

Lots of pros use 70-200mm F/4 lenses, especially landscape photographers who rarely shoot at F/2.8 and don't want the extra weight. Canon's 70-200mm F/4L version is virtually as sharp as the F/2.8 at 60%.of the price. See: Thomas Heaton. P.S. That training area for the horse is called a paddock. New York City boy here, BTW.

[@Reportageandart]

Canon markets their 70-200 f4 as a "pro" L lens as well... Not sure why Jared hates L mount so much, they have grown a nice line up of great lenses... God forbid anyone use something different than Sony and Canon LOL

[@Billbeaux]

Do you get a good pump in before you film your vids?

[@uniktbrukernavn]

asking for a friend?

[@AllCarsUnited]

All of the sudden my 70 200 gmaster doesn't seem as ridiculous priced as before

[@Zuzzanna]

I would love that for my a6000 ;) but it's not going to happen

[@xc68000]

So about 1k more to get 2.8, seems about right actually. Lenses from all brands are getting more expensive due to shrinking market for digital cameras.

[@xc68000]

high iso plus great ibis is the 2.8 fetish really a thing still? I mean I get the depth of field argument, but on a zoom compression helps quite a bit. I'm more interested in build quality and image quality...contrast, sharpness at various focal lengths, flare, is the lens weather sealed? Really loving what I'm seeing in the S1 line and hope you continue to do reviews on it...looks like a phenomenal camera. I have a ton of great manual focus glass how about doing a review on how those might work with adapters?

A great looking lens from a build quality and design perspective, reminds me of lenses from the 70's in that respect. At $1697 it's expensive for the specification but the image quality looks excellent.

[@chcomes]

I think that the "pro" moniker, apart of the obvious marketing thing, refers to quality in terms of sharpness, fringing, fast focus, etc etc, all that is not the aperture itself. I bought some non-pro EF glass and I was very disappointed, going back to use better quality glass of higher-number aperture.

[@Thumpr110]

I just came in hopes to hear “L MOUNT ALLIANCE” several times

[@harolsblog]

Tyler, I was about to say the same thing! 😂😂😂

[@chcomes]

BTW, I think that the real-life video for the S1 made for some of the best shots you have even done in these (very good) videos. More about the set-up than the camera itself but anyway.

[@itscaptainterry]

This video was so amazing I put it on 10x speed and already watched it.

[@mcmoose64]

The collar would be handy for long exposure landscapes.

[@jimfeldman4035]

I think the argument for the smaller lightweight mirrorless bodies is better served by the smaller F/4 lenses. They're lighter, smaller, and cheaper. Less penalty these days for cranking up the ISO and the bokeh difference is that big for me

[@matemarijan3795]

You came here for 0:28

[@georgegbo8441]

The 90 mm macro lens has the same manual/autofocus feature never had an issue with it

[@Phantommxr]

I watched this video mainly just to hear you say 'L-Mount ALLIANCE" ... Love it and thanks for not letting me down!!!

[@iKIMshuffle]

Probably a dumb question, would it focus just as fast if I’m using a Leica body? So, I’m currently using a Leica 24-70 and I swear it will not focus in broad daylight. After rigging my Leica, I surely won’t have money for another lens but it’s on sale right now.

[@CosminRusu154]

When you are in manual mode and move the clutch to manual mode, on the camera screen you will have the focus magnifier displayed automatically.

[@unickolay]

Hi! Thanks for review! Does it save focus on the object during zooming during shooting 4K video?

[@MattisProbably]

I shoot my 70-200/2.8 (The Tamron G2) at f/4 basically at all times. At f/4 the sharpness is great, the bokeh is great and you still have enough depth of field to work with. So an f/4 lens does make a lot of sense if you want something lighter. That being said, being able to go to f/2.8 does save my buns pretty often. So if you don't mind the extra weight I'd always go with the f/2.8. I was thinking about getting a 70-200 f/4, like the Tamron 70-210/4, but going from my old f/2.8 to an f/4 seemed like a downgrade more than an upgrade so I went for the Big Kahuna. Didn't regret it.

[@akivabernstein4723]

I love that there isn't an extending barrel.

[@mihalykiss83]

The reason because i watched this video is because i love how he says L-MOUNT ALLIANCE

[@44492611]

Ergonomics aside, wouldn’t the reversed focus ring make the camera more stable as you focus it? At least we don’t have to deal with slide zoom anymore.

[@KeithSklower]

Hi, your two reviews that I watched both portray the Lumix lenses as the only possible choices for the Lumix S series, but as of Aug 24, 2019 the sigma MC-21 converter was/is available and shipping from your sponsor (Adorama), and Sigma guarantees that its 70-200mm f2.8 will work with the mc-21 adapter. Would you have been tempted to do a comparison of the two lenses if you had thought of it? I bought the adapter to use another sigma lens to shoot concert videos ...

[@maku9144]

Nobody: Jared Polin: "L MOOOUNT ALLIANCE!!!" And i love it :D

[@alexflorica2991]

Panasonic Lumix S1 or Sony A7 III, which one do you think is better? :D

[@stevemarson9665]

errr.... it's 'PRO' because of the optical properties .... certified to be within the limits Leica set. If the coming 2.8 is also 'pro' it will weigh a ton if it is going to match the same criteria.

[@walrusgumboot]

Exactly this ^

[@f.feldmeier8248]

A personal question: Do you use your glasses while shooting? Cause in the B-Roll I didn't see them

[@chamodmalalathunga6920]

Is it a bad idea to not to have 30-70mm range in the collection?

[@GermanViking]

I really like your new background!

[@jeffrypalempung9628]

Hey jared , would you mind to review sigma art lens 35/1.2 , i want to know the AF performance compare to Lumix 50/1.4 and sigma 35/1.2 on Sony canera .

[@georgealexb3940]

Came here just to hear him say “L MOUNT ALLIANCE!!!” Hahaha thanks Jarred for not letting me down

[@thesharpercoder]

I think the tripod foot is probably meant for the smaller L-Mount bodies.

[@brian_db]

Not for me, but sure do love the L Mount Alliance gimmick. Coolest effect on KZbin to date.

[@danzbeard]

I agree. f4... pro? 🤷🏻‍♂️That alternative ring option though hahaha

[@kingzozo19]

That AF/MF switch system is very neat with short lens like Oly 17mm because you can zone focus easily for street shooting. But I do not thing that anyone will be using this system with 70-200, most people will probably be angry because they bumped the focus ring accidentally.

[@Digmen1]

I don't understand Jared's "L mount alliance thing" Surely its a good way for lens manufacturers and smaller camera companies to get together.

[@jasonbone5121]

I see "L-Mount Alliance" and I click immediately!!! (what have you created Fro!) You need an "I shoot RAW - L-Mount Alliance" edition shirt.

[@Lofote]

He can't. He is not part of it, only Leica, Panasonic and Sigma, no Fro 😉 but at least he does say it correctly, not like the Zmount which he calls Cmount 🤣

[@walrusgumboot]

Why do you think that a faster aperture automatically means better sharpness and faster focusing??? An f4 lens CAN be those things, just typically DSLR brands make their f4 the affordable option (and cut corners) making it slower to focus, less sharp and generally not weather sealed. That’s not the case with this lens, it’s bloody sharp, solid and weather sealed. But yeah you pay for it. By the way Lumix roadmap shows they’re also making a f2.8 version this year

[@mirnamilicevic9139]

Please do a video of critiquing photos of photographers that are youtubers (from Instagram probbably?) . That would be so interesting!

[@martian-sunset]

I like when you say "I don't know."

[@keithspurlock4732]

Jared, my understanding is that the Panasonic "PRO" lenses are their, "Leica Certified" lenses. Better glass and design in the Leica tradition.

[@mightyenid]

I’ve got to be honest, I only watched this to hear you say L Mount Alliance. You didn’t disappoint :)

[@jcfan1979]

lol same here!

[@tosvus]

Any plan to test it with the s1r? Hearing rumors it's not capable of fully utilizing the resolution of that sensor..

[@luisalejandro7560]

Not true at all, these Panasonic cameras have one of the best quality lenses and image I've seen in a long time.

[@tosvus]

@@luisalejandro7560 Thank you. I know the S1R is fantastic, I own it, as well as the 24-105. The 24-105 is great, though not quite fantastic in my view. However, I read a couple of places that the 70-200 is worse IQ than the 24-105. For now, I ended up buying the Sigma 70-200 EF, as I managed to get a new US version lens for a little over 1000 shipped. Later on, I may sell it and buy a native lens. :)

[@Ira88881]

Damn! Outstanding photos!

[@chanderson93]

Ugh , this is why I'm on the fence about buying the new camera , plus the body alone is expensive, rather wait and buy when I have more lens options!

[@Bismarckp1]

I believe that the pro line are the Leica certified lenses (the kit lens is not one)

[@Iamernestp]

I still use my canon EF 70-200mm F4 non IS lol. price.....price...

[@Zuzzanna]

Me too, mine has IS though :)

[@Iamernestp]

Susanne I 👍🏼👍🏼 great lenses for a very affordable price! I picked mine up in near new condition for $280 USD. That’s an L lens 70-200mm f4 for $280 🤯

[@Zuzzanna]

@@Iamernestp I bought mine used, but can't remember what I paid for it, we have a photo forum here in Denmark, were the members can set their gear for sale. It works perfectly still 😊

[@bestamerica]

' coool nice camera and len... but still problem with blur blur focus and blur blur depth of field... also sometime contrast brightness control

[@roberto-maddaloni]

(11:32) A bit misleading since you're comparing a Full Frame L-Mount lens to an APS-C lens. But you're right about the price...

[@JV-YTS]

🗣L MOUNT ALLIANCE!! (So I bought the Fro Pack Presets and I love them!! The sandlot and waffle house are definitely my favorite at the moment)

[@MaciejUrbanowicz]

I'd prefer to have f/4 because it's lighter and smaller than f/2.8. I travel often and it's better to have smaller lenses.

[@WildBikerBill]

Options are good!

[@RoyEncela]

please add some earth rumbling sound effects whenever you say L MOUNT ALLLIIAAAANCE 😂

[@Wynner3]

I don't work out, but I take long hikes while hand holding my 2lb Nikon D500 with 5lb 200-500mm lens attached. While carrying several more pounds of camera gear in my backpack. Then again, I guess that is my workout

[@BiotikaAnti]

dude , i love your shirt

[@TheGregWallace]

Jared........................Did you get us some pictures at the Philly Naked Bike Ride?

[@NightlyFidelis]

I've clic on the video only for the "LLLL MOUUUUUNT ALIIANCE"

[@ahojahojish]

I love Panasonic colors. I also think Panasonic make great, high quality stuff. Only The only thing is their pricing.....overpriced.

[@guyjordan8201]

How much do you shoot between f/2.8 and f/4 vs at f/4 and above?

[@c0veredinash]

Depends what your subject is guess? Seems like this lense is aimed at landscapes and not potraits

[@actionphotopassion5082]

Lens roadmap is already dead. The only lens that I'm waiting for since announcement is 16-35/4 from pany and we are arriving to fall 2019 and still nothing. Until Panasonic isn't delivering any UWA lens I won't dive into the system and yes I'd like to. The bodies are exactly what I expect, meaning a Sony A-mount body ergonomics, handling and feeling fully mirrorless this time. Come on Panasonic activate yourself with the lenses deliveries and yes you'll sell loads of this system.

[@tcwhite0104]

Omg I had to get my L-Mount Alliance Fix. Not a bad looking lens though

[@onlyonecannoli3952]

I liked it better the first time you reviewed this lens.

[@Scottye-yn8zc]

I would like to see someone use the Sony A7 RIV & 200-600mm f5.6-6.3 G together in a review

[@polymniaskate]

Tbh I mostly watched to see Jared utter his now legendary *L-mount Alliance* and wasn't disappointed :D

[@GavinSeim]

The prices of the LMA lenses are absurd. Now we know why Fuji is taking the attention from Cameras like Panasonic.

[@angelluisphotos4842]

if you put a "PRO" on your forehead you will be a "Jared F2.8 Pro" lmaoooo

[@JoeMaranophotography]

I have some fantastic images taken with the m43 100-400mm and thats f4 at 100mm and its m43 f4 so I think this 35mm lens should be more than capable and worthy of the pro badge ;)

[@fredriksvard2603]

Amateurs carry the industry. A huge chunk of L lenses, leicas, 2.8 zooms or 1.2 primes get bough by consumers who "need" that sort of stuff. Pro to me is dependability. The lens or camera won't break down or glitch or let in dust and so on. Pros are boring like that, they don't have time staring at sharpness charts like amateurs do.

[@bricemyfoto8907]

It would sure be nice to have a 70-200 F4....

[@syanukeshks9198]

I m Learning photography from you 😄😄😄😄😄

[@ronyhosen2566]

sir I have a dream and that's photography..but i have no ability to buy a camera..can you help me sir..please sir,try to fulfill my dream..please sir..I am waiting for your reply

[@4partmedia]

The L-Mount Alliance will one day rule the all of the lands.

[@TomWatkinsTV]

Damn that one sexy lens

[@vladvadim8806]

The only reason I watch his videos regarding L mount lenses is cause of that L mount alliance sound and animation...

[@drewrobertson6286]

No, putting pro on your forehead doesn’t make you a pro photographer, it makes you a pro fro!

[@daliamosesp]

this is stupid you realise canon also do a "pro" series 70-200 at f4 too? there's lots of professional uses for that aperture or even smaller photography doesn't revolve entirely around portraits and blurry backgrounds

[@TorresinhoLFC]

Panasonic's FF system is too expensive. It's good but it's not better than Sony or Nikon or Canon so why is it so expensive? Makes no sense.

[@tomwold8269]

That was a Super Unbelievable sniff and wind tunnel test! WOW! 😃

[@Synthsoldier]

LLLLLL MOUNT ALLIANCE!!!!1!!!

[@MrFirstdance2000]

I am now performing my own FroKnows "L Mount Alliance" at family get togethers and local malls. Babies love it....adults not so much !

[@obsidian00]

Nothing for nothing Jared but I really enjoyed the real world review of the S1R and those photos you took were nothing but HEAT!!! That being said, a F/4 70-200mm isn't...really Pro now is it...don't get me wrong, you can get Pro images but...yeah.

[@ShigekiNakayama1126]

i want

[@muamamu1]

Yo, Jared, you’re constantly ignoring the existence of landscape photographers. f/4 works for them cause they never shoot wide open AND it makes the lens smaller, lighter and easier to carry. That would also explain the collar, you know, cause you shoot landscapes without a tripod rarely, you know?

[@v0ldy54]

For a landscape shooter a lens like that is just stupidly expansive for no reason when you have way cheaper 70-200 f/4 from other brands that are great optics anyway

[@muamamu1]

Paolo Bugnone Backup Sure, but doesn’t take away the PRO moniker away.

[@bwexperiences]

Too much for that glass... nice photos though 👍🏼

[@keloduma]

Yess!! L-MOOOUNT ALLLIIIAAANCE!! I needed my fix

[@PabloRubio]

I use Sony cameras, but just came for the "L MOUNT ALLIANCE" show.

[@stefanlorse2249]

the screaming "L Mount Alliance" Part is awesome *rofl

[@nowornever2504]

There was a funny/witty American Airlines flight attendance about 12 years ago, who would make a inflight PA announcement “One World Alliance” in a deep evil voice...can’t help but thinking Jared was on one of his flight and stole his idea....

[@th3osl333]

" *L M O U N T A L L I A N C E* "

[@MaxRovensky]

EEEELLLLLL MAUNT ALLIANS

[@avigdonable]

How come he’s got afro?

[@jakobroider6014]

i love the af/mf switch on my sony 90mm f2.8 macro

[@leescozzare2174]

Its called a riding arena. :-)

[@HeroShotz]

Mc21 adapter

[@prabijshrestha]

Wow good to hear L-mount alliance again 😃😃

[@peterlemke3468]

Nicely reviewed Jared. I can see your next business card now. Jared Polin Brown Eye Photographer That should get you plenty of work in San Francisco and Los Angeles.

[@robertocordero4682]

Are people soo sensitive that they have to complain about the gun shots he did with the lens? Even when he says he’s not a fan of guns, which I didn’t think he had to say. Soo sad.

[@bigotonbrand]

No one complained, beto

[@robertocordero4682]

Bigotes Bigotes Scroll down the comments and you’ll see who complained.

[@samuraiken5666]

Virtue signaling is a hobby with a lot of folks.

[@j16m02]

I'm really, really tired of "THE L MOUNT ALLIANCE"!! Just sayin:

[@AdamFavre]

It was funny maybe the first two to 3 times. I barely watch his videos yet I see this often

[@DIO.Passenger]

Very heavy, expensive, and F4.

[@ชลวิทย์บรุกกิ้งค์]

FC Form Thailand