Canon 5D Mark IV or Canon 5D Mark III : Which one is right for you?

[@GabrielLabrecque]

I just upgraded a month ago from Mark III to IV. It might not be worth the money for people on a budget but if you're an enthusiast, it's definitely a fun upgrade to make. The touch screen is totally awesome. Very fast and very intuitive like I would never expect from a niche product like this. It's almost if not as much as responsive as an iPhone. I also wanted to have a GPS for many years but hated the fact that the external one uses the hot shoe. The wifi is also very worth it. I now peacefully sit on my sofa and presort my pictures while watching TV, pixel peeping on my iPad before I transfer the files to Lightroom. I've heard so many rant on the mark IV it's almost convinced me not to upgrade. BUT... it's still way better than the mark III AND and it's a Canon with an EF mount!!! You don't get that with a A7RII, do you?

[@KingHarry]

Mark IV it is. Upgrading from a 70D

[@smokey267]

Man the MK 4 is making the MK 3 look pretty good especially when you consider the age and price differences.

[@chrisp5526]

smokey267 I agree.. I have the mark 3, and was envious when I saw the m4 showing 4K video... that was until I saw the file sizes were ridiculously high, and the crop factor is terrible. I do wish my m3 had gps so I can track where I took my photos, and I wish it had video autofocus, but other than that, I can’t see upgrading the camera. And with the high price differences, it would make the M4 a bad choice. I’m not sure if I would need the WiFi..I assume it makes it better to transfer photos, but direct connect of memory card to computer is very easy and extremely fast.

[@joekerr8584]

Chris P i heard mk 3 shoots 4k now. is that true. is that newer release or just a software update?

[@carloschaviratv]

I bought the Mark iii in December and now I'm looking forward to upgrade to 4K. When I saw that canon released Mark IV, my brain froze for a second. It's was the same feeling when you get a cook gadget but a week later, a better version is released and you just want to turn back time. Thank god, 5D Mark IV didn't change that much and I can move on to a GH4 or just move to a RED and still get to use the Mark III for photos and some cool videos. I hate that canon won't enable this DSLRs to shoot RAW just so you spend much more money for another one who does. Great review, man.

[@da_de]

STOP YELLING AT ME PLEASE! IT'S KIND OF ANNOYING. BUT THANKS FOR THE VIDEO!

[@jcpix8405]

Sticking with my 5D Mark III... Not enough here worth upgrading really. Especially with 5 grand price tag in Australia...

[@SpectrumTheOriginator]

+c0pyimitati0n lmao good one

[@KingOfNewYorkHacks]

+Marek Kunicki I completely agree, I rented the Mark IV for 3 days and shot NYFW and the images were brilliant using higher ISO's , I even tested 32000 and for online purposes they were surprisingly usable and most important the client was happy with all images they requested. Its a definite upgrade for images but I didn't test it enough to comment about the 4K yet.

[@gwengood2353]

Marek Kunicki

[@BayAreaMovement]

+Marek Kunicki agreed. I just bought mines. 👌

[@BayAreaMovement]

+Marek Kunicki agreed. I just bought mines. 👌

[@StephanEilert]

Just got an used 5d mk iii. Im pretty happy with it, dont bother it being a bit old if I can buy if for less than 50% of mk IVs price

[@NaturalGallantBodybuilding]

The autofocus in video mode on the Mark IV is worth it for itself for anyone doing video, if you're going to compare mark iii to mark IV. The autofocus is soooooo handy for self filming situations especially when you don't have a landmark or object to set the focus upon and want to get a quick shot. Something that is even more difficult when you're shooting wide open.

[@elynai]

I have to decide Buy my 1st profesional camara. I think that Canon 5 D Mark iii will be good start. Thank you

[@chrisp5526]

The mark 3 is amazing. The full frame is a must. But what separates it from lesser cameras is the great iso numbers. You can go really high on iso numbers, and get very little graininess. The fact that you can go high on iso and get great picture quality means you don’t need large aperatures to take low light photos; you only need large aperture lenses to have good bokeh now. Sure the mark3 doesn’t have an automatic focus for video, but with the high iso capabilities, just put the aperture of your lens to a high number, and everything will be in focus, with the auto iso increasing as needed to make e correct exposure setting. I do like he gps feature of the new mark 4, bc it will allow you to easily track where your photos were taken, and view them on a map, if viewing them on an iPad. But is t really worth the extra $1,000?-I don’t think so. And as for WiFi, it really doesn’t take much effort to transfer photos without WiFi. As for 4K video recording-besides the mark 4 having it, the crop factor is terrible, and I hear the file sizes make it unusable for non professionals, unless you have amazingly large hard drives. If I was on a budget, I’d get the mark 3. You won’t regret it. It takes amazing photos, is ergonomically amazing, and very easy to use. I hope this helped! But then again, I’m replying to your comment a year late. You must have already bought a camera. If you did, what did you buy?

[@davidg3664]

Chris P thanks for the information, very helpful! I know I am very late but should I stick with the 5d mark iii or should I get the new 90d. My budget is around $1,000-$1,300. I want to invest on lenses because I think it’s more important.

[@cassineslo895]

@@davidg3664 a full frame for the price of a aps c size sensor is always a better option. in this case the 90d vs the mark 3 is really up to wether you're looking into video or photography. if its video then the 90d and if its photography then the mark 3.

[@darylpritchard7896]

I'm not using my camera (5dIII) for video at all, I just wanted a camera to take pictures (not videos) so sticking with my 5DIII for now :-)

[@macleodmoto]

Ive been shooting with the MKII for about 6 years now. Its been my workhorse. I honestly feel like upgrading to the MKIV makes sense for me, would be another reliable work camera that I could trust for the next few years

[@charles3283]

30.4 MP vs 22.4. processing power, wifi, nfc, gps, dual pixel raw, viewfinder 2, 4k, 1080 @ 60fps, hdr video, timelapse, auto focusing in video mode. just to name a few upgrades and you say it's not worth it. getting this camera you wouldn't have to upgrade for a very long time. it is definitely a worthy upgrade especially for those who want the best and not looking to upgrade for a long time. think of it as a long time investment.

[@cnottagejr]

well i was use to taking pictures only on my phone i never use the camera before so my uncle gave me his old camera a canon 400d 10.1 megapixel and i was using that and i learn the camera and i took some great shots. but then i realize my pictures wasn't looking sharp like the girl pictures who lived next door to me. i was using the tamron 18-200 lens that came with the camera and i notice in low light situations the camera didn't take a good picture and i had the iso at the max which was 1600. the camera don't record video and i notice all of this by using another camera that excels in everything that's what i meant by that. what i meant to say was i wanted a camera with a better auto focus and better in low light and can record video when i want to do that. a couple of people told me to go full frame and look at the canon 5d mark 3 and the canon 6d mark 2 i just want to choose between the ywo and call it a day lol.

[@Raj_joshi_photography]

iam a wedding photographer. I switched from mark3 to 5dmk4. It is a fantastic tool. It offers nice slowmo, contimous focus in events like dance, sangeet. better dynamic range than mark 3

[@Vimagez]

do you use 4k? and how does it freeze your computer when you edit due to the large size?

[@FullsendBill]

What about photography I'm interested in photography. Would you go with 6d ii or Mark iv

[@77.88.]

No one is better than you when it comes to good honest information!

[@pinch-of-salt]

Typical Canon trying to play it safe and not kill it's other products. #StepUpCanon

[@HoldFastFilms]

Name one company that deliberately kills their own products? Not defending Canon, BTW.

[@pinch-of-salt]

Sony literally killed their DSLR market at the beginning and then eventually ended up replacing almost all the DSLRs with Mirrorless.

[@michaelandrew83]

Sony is the only company that puts seemingly every single bit of tech in every camera they put out but it has only been like that for a couple of years. And to be honest, sony cameras are a nightmare to use for professional photography. For some reason and I cannot for the life of me understand why, but the internet seems to think that Canon owes them some sort of super camera. They want every single thing packed into 1 camera.

[@pinch-of-salt]

Michael Andrew that's what competition is for. You can't expect half assed products to compete in today's market.

[@michaelandrew83]

Mirrorless is worthless for high speed and event still photography. I am not talking about Video, which to be honest, the Sony a7sii is incredible at for the value.

[@theboxingtutor]

I've been shooting with the original 5D for a couple years now. It makes great photos but there are some limitations, especially in low light. Can't wait to upgrade to the mark iii finally!!

[@do-or-die5822]

my free advise for people who currently own cropped censor :-if you are using cropped censor and want to upgrade to full frame then wait for another 6-7 months for price of 5d mark 3 to fall further and upgrade to 5d mark 3. mark 4 has nothing exciting. no point jumping to 5d mark 4. instead wait for few months and invest in better lenses.if you already have 5d mark 3 then shut up and keep shooting with 5d mark 3. you will be a fool to upgrade to 5d mark 4. it seems canon has just launched 5d mark 4 for heck of it3-4 years after 5dmark 3 and still both cameras look the same. it would have been better if they could have changed some of its design. its funny that cropped censor like 80d has a articulating screen but the full frame version of canon does not have this feature.. I have no clue what has canon been thinking while designing 5d mark 4. Fuji's and sony are constantly coming up with top features but canon is still stuck to ali baba's time..

[@MrDontworrybehappy10]

O think mk iv is just the hook to fool people who can't afford it into buy the 6d mk ii when it will be out...

[@MrKdr500]

"its funny that cropped censor like 80d has a articulating screen but the full frame version of canon does not have this feature" pro bodies need to be rugged & weather sealed the 80D is a cheaper plastic camera. Got nothing to do with the size of the sensor!

[@do-or-die5822]

MrKdr500 I don't see any reason why that screen cannot be provided ..

[@duckisaurus]

Asking you since you seem to have some good advice - looking to move to full frame, but looking at the new 80D and Mark III. 80D is cropped but has more MP + the articulating screen is beyond helpful. Does the overall MP on the 80D makeup for the lost information that I'd get on the full frame on the Mark III?

[@bambiboozle4740]

Yes! Please keep complaining about the specs of the Mark IV, I keep getting higher offers for my inferior Mark III!

[@stefanmodigh7897]

I like how they haven't changed the design. I went from a 5dmrk1 to a mrk3. I just picked the mrk3 up and I new exactly where the basic buttons and their functions were. I can see why they haven't changed the design its so you dont have to fiddle with all these new buttons. 5dmrk1 had that one for about six years, mrk3 for almost 5 years now. They have never let me down. Been shooting with them for private and work. Will sure be looking in to the mrk4 at the store. :)

[@23mclarry23]

I'm going to keep my 5D III, it is really a working-horse, lovely piece of equipment! In my opinion the 5D IV, is not worth the swop if you already own a 5D III, use some money on good glass instead👌

[@carsandconcerts]

For 2021 - I Purchased a 5d Mark iii after seeing your review

[@teamloony]

Another great video Jared. Did you know that in the UK where I live, the 5D MK4 costs £3599?!! It's actually cheaper for me to fly to New York on British Airways (£390 return) and by the MK4 from B&H in Manhattan. I would be saving my self £500. I think I've just talked my self into a mini break to the USA 👍🏼

[@calvinchann1996]

So don't be surprised when they add sales tax to the quoted US price and then customs charge you duty when you bring it back to the UK.

[@teamloony]

+Calvin Chann I'm not sure I'll be making it common knowledge that the camera around my neck is new.

[@sugarcane1984]

I'm a Brit working in HK and was quoted the equivalent of £2500 for the 5D MK4 and £1500 for the 5D MK3. I hope it's legit...

[@calvinchann1996]

sugarcane1984 I doubt it

[@stephentait8734]

or you can just buy it from hongkong for £2331 that's with tax and import charges included

[@richcz3]

I have a 5D Mk II - Amazed by the Mk IV so far. There are so many features that make it an incredible upgrade. The touch screen alone adds immediate value - Pinch zoom, pick focus area, delete confirm. GPS, WiFi - adjust settings/taking pics through my cell phone will be a big benefit to my photography needs. The MK III isn't even on the radar I use my cameras for photos 99% of the time. Video is nice, but not a defining reason for making the purchase. If video is 70% of the reason you're buying a camera, there are much better DSLR's than even the MK III.

[@stephenlewis9436]

Thanks as always Jared for taking the time!

[@paulduffy697]

I would rather save the cash and get more glass..

[@froknowsphoto]

glass is always a good option.

[@Pinoysoundmachine74]

Nah, i'll wait for the 5d mark 10 to come out.

[@beauphomasterpiece3795]

I never looked at your subscriber count before but looking at it now makes me feel you deserve far more

[@beauphomasterpiece3795]

I learn so much from you . Hope you get to 1million soon

[@cmillerphotos]

Thanks for the video! Just saw I can get a factory refurb 5D IV for $1399 and considering upgrading from my 10 year old 70D. Looks like I'm gonna be re-learning my camera again. 🙂

[@mikkirurk1]

2023 Canon 5DM3 costs nothing on ebay. Still takes as awesome pictures as on release day.

[@LifiaTubeHD]

Hi Jared, what type camera you used to record this video ? Can you recommend to me to upgrade my camera video for youtube video. Your answer will safe my time. Thanks

[@cactustweeter2890]

Thanks for your feedback Jared.

[@PaulKretz]

6:29 - You CAN do it on 5DIII! Just not with AF-ON, but One-Shot\Servo switch could be assigned to DoF preview button (the one on the front, beside the lens). Pretty much the same convenience.

[@TonyDo]

Looking to invest in my first full frame! Which will be used 75/25 between photo and video. That said, which would you guys recommend? -Refurb 5d Mark III with a solid lense or two (Roughly 2K for refurb) -Sony A7Rii with a mediocre lense? (Roughly 3K) I don't want to spend 4k+ right off the rip so that throws the MK IV out the window. Not only is the A7Rii more expensive but i'd have to get a lense adapter,and that leaves room for a mediocre lense. Even though the Mark III is almost 5 years old, does it still hang with the newer big boys and is a worthy investment as a first full frame? Let me know what you all think!

[@Mix5454]

The Mark III is still my dream camera, thanks for the update Jared.

[@Sutterjack]

I have two 5D M3's - I bought my last one when B&H dropped the price to $2k before discontinuing them for good. Yes it's 6 year old camera, but the photo and video quality out of it is still very respectable, and it's a proven workhorse. The 5D M3 was a HUGE improvement over the 5D M2. Wish I could say the same for the M4 - yes, I like several updates like the dual pixel autofocus and touchscreen on the M4 and other refinements. But waiting 4 years for this successor that has no articulating screen, and a horrible codec on it's CROPPED 4K video - give me a break! Too little too late. Still love canon glass, but for 4K video I guess I'll have to mount them on a C300 M2-- please Canon, pay attention to what Sony and Panasonic are doing and get your technology up to date!

[@Leonbartolome]

Hey, I am loving your videos and that you share the raw pics, TKS!

[@martinshow5146]

when it comes to cameras, Jared is the Best

[@MrRichz5]

I'm retired and I shoot all the time. I have 2 5D Mark III's and I was thinking of going with the Mark IV but I think I'll stay with what I have. I have a ton of "L" glass too. I'm not making money, only on a rare occasions. There's also the raw incompatibility with my CS6 and Lightroom 6.7 versions. That's a no go because I'd have to go with CC's then. Great video, it helped me decide.

[@shakes39]

Fuji ? Nikon? Switch now or get jobbed again in 4yrs sent back my mark Iv..... Staying with the mkIII for now...

[@devonkrige267]

Hey Jared!! Hope you well. The canon 5d3 can in actual fact do the single focus to af servo option, but the button that would be remapped would be the aperture button for the 5dmk3👍🏻

[@noni_mus]

I think I would want the Canon 5D Mk IV since I need the upgrade from my Canon 40D. I shoot interiors, but I'm starting to shoot more events so I would also like to learn how to shoot videos, too (will get both video guides when I'm upgrading).

[@666vraptor]

So, here is the deal. Right now i own a 5D mk2 and a 7D. In about 2 weeks time im about to upgrade my 7D to a 7D mk2. (I dont know if i should wait a few more months and maybe the 7D mk3 will come out, but thats a gamble) i want to upgrade my full frame too but i dont know what to choose. The 5D mk3 or the mk4. Obviously both are a huge leap farward from the 5D mk2. What do you guys think?

[@KablamoMortsel]

when I upgraded from 5D2 to 5D3 it was worth it (although I still shoot with the mk2 sometimes), but this upgrade is not worth the price difference IMHO, at least not for the kind of pictures I take (I rarely shoot vid). The 5D3 does everything I expect it to do and hasn't let me down (yet), so I'll wait it out until something new comes along worthy of my hard earned cash.

I come from Mark II as second camera (first C300) , Mark IV can be a good to me. Regards from Moscow

[@oscarbalbuena9923]

Mark VII is kinda far away in time buddy. Maybe in 8-9 years. Put down the vodka, is not helping you.

[@frankyvee1]

And that is a four year jump in technology and innovation.. Way to go Canon.

[@mtnman1984]

In March, moved to full frame. Bought Canon glass and adapted it to Sony a7rii anticipating using the 5D mark iv as a primary and the Sony as a backup/video camera. Now, probably going to buy the 5D mark iii and two or three e-mount primes. Why? The 5D was going to be primarily for stills. The card tech and buffer is what gets me. I don't need a huge buffer, but my Sony blows the Canon away with resolution and dynamic range so I was looking for the 5D to have speed. At this price, it shouldn't even be a question. Cards are not that expensive when dealing with a $3,500 body. The mark iii has the same card tech, is within splitting hairs with autofocus, and has a bigger buffer frame count. I can deal with everything else and I'm doing it so I can wait and see what Canon does next. If they continue on the current path, I may go Nikon and I know what it would cost. Don't think it's happening? I watched a guy drop around $8K in my local shop while I was comparing the mark iii and mark iv. He was investing in the Nikon D810.

[@eeflat]

stop yellinggggg wtf

[@ArtsyG3mini]

lmaoo

[@africanhistory]

Good tip,

[@Wes_Jones]

As a hobbyist, I still love my 5dII but it won't last forever so an upgrade is somewhere in my future. I shoot time lapse, landscape and portraits so a good all around camera would be nice. Video is fun to play with but not a requirement. I'm thinking a 5dsr would be a good choice.

[@GeraintHewett]

I am an enthusiast photographer and have multiple cameras for different areas of photography (70D for wildlife/sports, 6D for portrait/landscape and Fuji XT-10 for street) . Would you recommend upgrading the 6D to a 5Dmk3 and why?

[@jermaineparker1959]

Im a Photographer in Philadelphia... i was using the 6D form2 years and upgraded to the 5D IV. I shot a Wedding with the IV the next day and it was almost like day and night... the handling and performance, that is. It was so fun and easy to shoot with, that i ran out of space on my sd card. first time i ever did that. P.S. I would love to meet you one day... since youre here in the same city. Youre like a superstar but I havent run into you yet. Thanks for the video. Peace.

[@Skillow]

I have a 6D right now, 5DMk3 prices dropped and I got interested... Is it worth upgrading? (I still think it would be an upgrade)

[@Mikeybikey88]

Skillow image quality wise: no. But the 5D Mark 3 have much better autofocus. So it maybe be worth it if you shoot moving subjects.

[@Niro989]

Why not mentioning Magic Lantern that have a timelapse option, many other tools and of course 24p raw video (looks like the mark iv will not increase the writing capabilities). You have shirt that says "I shoot raw". the exsitance of Magic Lantern software was missing here...

[@RaadMambles]

I just got a new mark 3 for 400 bucks as a gift. mark 4 is still like 900+ bucks, may as well get a mirrorless at that point

[@SM_zzz]

Hi from Ireland, thanks for putting in the effort to make these videos. 🤙🏻

[@PrageethKumara]

I went with your advice and purchased a 5D mark III which came down to $1865 brand new, instead of 5D mark IV which was about $2820 brand new with discounts here in Sri Lanka..!! Prices are pretty cool ha? As you said I am thinking of lens to buy with the 5D mark III. Should I go with a Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC or a used 24-70 f4 IS L lens? My budget is below $1000.

[@RidingLifesRoads]

I wouldn't upgrade from the 5dmkIII for photography, but if I was buying from scratch I'd go for the 5dmkIV Same as the 1Dx and 1DxmkII, I wouldn't upgrade, but from scratch I'd go for the latest version.

[@RuXTaR]

I have a few reasons why I'm moving away from Canon. I'm a hybrid shooter, need to be able to switch from photo to video and back to photo quickly with good features for both. Canon adding 4K is funny to me without putting in their C-Log and some video features like while-filming zebras and peaking (not sure if it has histogram while filming as well, but in case that's missing, it's missing!) Not to say the 4K is useless, it's useful, but limited, where other cheaper cameras have 4K without these limitations. I worked with the mkiii for 3 years and the quality is amazing in both video and photo. BUT, that was 4 years ago, and the mkiv did not mature 4 years I feel, if you know what I mean.

[@MakenzieRae]

I no joke gasped when you brought up the dual pixel raw technology. I have been sitting comfortably with my 5d mark ii for years (until recently as i've been filming more) and am way behind the game on keeping up with new tech. I had no clue that they were working on that kind of technology. Holy shit

[@imranbmn]

I'm coming from a 60D and I intend to move up to a full frame but is it really worth it to go for the 5dm4 or should I just go with the 5dm3? the m4 is about 15k here is Malaysia while the m3 is 10k brand new and roughly 6-8k secondhand. My heart is telling me that if I want to upgrade, go big but logically and according to my wallet, it's better to go for the m3. Thing is, am I actually losing out on anything if I choose the m3? I know coming from a 60D it'll be a huge upgrade either way. (btw when is the 6dm2 coming out?)

[@shermn8]

Thanks Jared, I just purchased the 5DIII last evening, it is an upgrade as I wanted to step up to full frame; I don't shoot video so the MK III will be perfect for me...plus the MK IV $3499 price tag is too high for minimum upgrades...I have WiFi on my 7ODs, Great post!!

[@d.terrillwilson1575]

I've been going back and forth if I was going to upgrade or not I currently own the 5Ds, and the 80D along with the 5Dmk iii. I also have an a7s. So would you take the upgrade or stay with what you own if you was in my shoes?

[@hangingwithleetv]

The wind tunnel test kills me lol

[@rewind9536]

Comic reliefbwith amongst all these facts.

[@OpenDGuitar]

Staying with 5Diii because it has paid for itself many times over, and I have better video options. If it were less $ I’d upgrade.

[@DMAbCD]

So I am on the fence due to the pixel size difference between the 2 bodies. The 5D Mark 3 has larger pixels but fewer than the 5D Mark 4 that has smaller pixels but more of them. So what is the better photo quality of these 2 bodies with this information?Thanks

[@omeshsingh8592]

I sold my 5D-III in July. The price is a bit higher than I'd like at the moment so considering gettin the 80D in the meantime. How much better is the 30MP sensor than 24MP sensor in the 80D? Would need low light performance from time to time...

[@lim2001burger]

Look forward to the in-depth look on the dual pixel raw functionality - hopefully there are plans to do this?

[@BrendanForward]

I've been waiting for a review like this to come out for the last few weeks - so let me start by saying thank you. There seems to be this preoccupation with saying that Canon didn't catch up to industry leaders like the A7r II or the D810 in terms of dynamic range or resolution. Secondly, the current reviews out there (I won't mention who) have this tendency to mark features such as video crop or the limitations of Dual-pixel raw as deal breakers for those shopping around. For myself, I am astrophotographer who has enjoyed the 70D, 5D Mark III but was looking for something to enter the full frame market for canon that would improve on shadow, and low light noise that was an ongoing issue that had to be addressed in post with my 5D Mark III and 70D. You honestly, yet critically discussed what this camera can do and what it should have done better while not throwing out the baby with the bathwater. For that, I tip my hat to you Jared. Cheers man

[@panzerfaustnl]

The MK IV, but I have already bought the 5DsR. I have seen the 5D IV taking video's, and one thing what is very positive, it doesn't easily overheat. And the images (jpeg) are really good what you take from the 4K stream. And that is one of the reasons why they didn't compress the film stream, JPeG is already compressed. The only drawback is the file size. But he, a single picture of the Hasselblad H5D can be as big as 1.2Gb. In comparison with that, the film files are not that big. But when our friends are ready with the adjustments of Magic Lantern, you shoot RAW film with this camera and you decide if you want to have 4K or not. And how many camera's can shoot film in RAW! The Dual Pixel is as good as on the 80D, it works flawless, no other DSLR is that smooth with focusing in film. What you already noticed is the older card slots, but you can use the newer cards and you notice really a big difference. I have asked my friends @ Canon Netherlands for some comments and they said that the card slot is in fact fast enough.

[@trevorpsy]

Hi Jared. Seems like a couple things (important things) were left out. My understanding is the dynamic range for stills is significantly improved in the Mark IV, and the focusing is quicker and more accurate in the Mark IV. Do I have these things right?

[@zikochadrianbanda480]

Am in love with the review of the Mark IV, I think am upgrading

[@SocietateaAscendenta]

Stick with what you have, people. Enjoy your present camera and let others throw their money out the window.

[@miguelslm]

Hello Jared, which camera did you use to film this video? Love the colors and the quality. Thank you.

[@TheDeanCStone]

I'm waiting for Photokina to make final decision on the 5D MkIV (I own a 5DMkIII, 7DMkII, and GH4 with a Metabones.) I'm planning to sell my 5D MkIII and keep the 7D and GH4. Auto-focus is the highest priority for me, especially shooting video as a stroke disabled my right hand. I'm pretty okay with shooting 1080p, but I have a question that I haven't been able to get an answer to. Is the "Crop Factor" that is present in the 4k video also present in 1080p or 720p modes? I assume it's not, but until I hear otherwise....

[@y-adouradou446]

Hi Jared, I think it's nice comparison but you forgot something in the equation. You should have throw the 5DSR in the battle. Cause the main rival for the 5d4 is not from Nikon, is not the 5d3, it's definitively their own camera 5dsr. People are not gonna drop Canon anyway, so if they have a choice to make to change camera, it's certainly gonna be that one, especially that the price point is exactly the same

[@jliverty]

I'm just going to use this for travelling, I'm having a problem which one I should go with ? I have the money for mk4 but do I really need that ? I'm not full time photographer and publish this and turn it into money, I'm doing this because the state or art, fun and hobby. I have the option go between mk3 + 24-70 2.8 II or mk4 body only with 50mm 1.8 or 14-70mm F/4L , I need your input thank you.

[@joellindfors449]

Better have good lens. a mk4 body equipped with a low level lens is not o good combo.

[@deanevangelista6359]

I upgraded from the Mark ll to the lV, and that is quite a difference, especially now that a refurbished M lV can be had for $2,500.

[@vamshikrishna2703]

In both of them, which camera is better to shoot under the street lights in night and also in dark.

[@sambonoby]

could you pls help me which one is better 5D mark iii or Mark iv or DSR for (concert photography) i shoot on stage so pls kinldy request wait your urgent advise i am already have 5D MARK III AND I WANT TO UPGRADE AND I AM TOTALLY WONDER RIGHT NOW FOR MY CHOICES

[@magnusbruce4051]

I think your overall conclusion makes sense - it's worth upgrading from the mk iii if your income depends on the photos you produce, but if you're an amateur with a low or average income (like me) then it probably isn't worth it. Also, I note that the USA RRP in USD is less than what the Canon store is selling it for in GBP. This means that the mk iv costs just shy of US$5000 if you buy it in the UK through the official store! I'm not planning on upgrading right now, but I think when I do it will be to the mk 3 as it seems better value for money. However, my 600D still has plenty left to give if I treat it to some nice glass ;-)

[@calvinchann1996]

The US price does not include sales tax whereas the UK price includes VAT.

[@angelobarrera41]

I have a dilemma, please help!!! I am venturing in wedding photography and my current gear is a 6D as my main shooter and the T3i as a second shooter. I have 85 1.2 MkII, Sigma 35 1.4 art, and a 17-40mm f4 L. I would love to shoot at full-frame for all my lens. I have a wedding coming up in 4 months and I would like to replace my T3i to 5D but where I am torn is, I can buy a 5Dmk3 now just in time for my wedding shoot or wait longer and miss out on two weddings to meet my budget for the 5Dmk4. Help Jared!

[@jethrobodine4638]

Jared, i have the canon 70D (for wildlife) and 6D. i shoot macro, wildlife and landscapes. would you recommend going up from the 6d to the mark iv or the 5 Dsr 50 mega pixel camera? i do shoot portraits and general photos as well from time to time. I was wanting an all around camera that can do pretty much most things. I could care less about video. Price is not a concern. thanks and great video!

[@babyboy1971]

What camera do you use to shoot these videos? Great work! Love your style.

[@evolvermedia]

What a co-incidence for you to mention upgrading from a 60d to a mk3, cos that's still my go to camera!

[@martintapia9374]

😃👌 Absolutely love your reviews, man‼️

[@PeteRoy]

You made a 14 minute video about cameras and all you do is just talk, where are the examples photos? example videos? why not show us how the 4k video looks like?

[@vikk9596]

I m landscape photographer. i have 5d mark iii, now i m thinking about switch to nikon D810, what do u think ? please suggest me JARED POLIN ?

[@dimitrioszacharopoulos4853]

Hi Jared, just wanted to know something, as I am considering the Canon 5D Mark IV. When using the Dual Pixel AF, if I am correct, we need to use STM lenses right, to take advantage of the Dual Pixel AF? Considering we only have (I think) 3 STM lenses as of 2016, the 50mm f1.8, the 40mm f2.8 and the 24-105mm f3.5-5.6, considering you have worked so much on the camera already, are there any other lenses that can take advantage of the Dual Pixel AF?

[@deborap225]

I have a Mark II, Mark IV can be a good upgrade in my case?

[@CJAnderson]

Love the comments about not getting the newest and best body at the expense of quality glass. Most of us would be better served spending $1-2k on an excellent lens or two instead of upgrading the body we're currently shooting.

[@nxkstmedia7385]

Hey Jared, love your videos man! This one helped a lot.... We shoot a ton of real estate photos and videos. We use a Canon 6D right now and the photos come out amazing but the video lacks when it comes to shooting in low light for twilight shoots and dark rooms. We have decided to go with the 5DM4 because of 4k and 1080p at 60fps video and the autofocus is phenomenal for those close up shots on kitchen sinks, then panning to the whole kitchen. Appreciate the video man!

[@purenupe1]

i disagree that this 5Dm4 is a worthwhile upgrade for current mk3 users. the feature set is to similar, this should be for new cannon shooters, crop to full framers, and or full replacements/ backups. i say if you have mk3 wait for mk4 price drops

[@froknowsphoto]

yea I don't agree with that at all especially since ive used the new camera.

[@michaelandrew83]

Have you used the camera? A blanket statement like that deserves some background, what kinds of photographers? I am shooting a wedding next week and you can bet your house that I would much rather have the 5f4 than the 3. Why on earth why would I pass up on an extra stop of clean DR and noise control?

[@bigfdawg]

ok but can i get a huuhhhhyeah?

[@purenupe1]

+Jared Polin i just have a hard time believing a true cost benefit analysis for the minor updates wouldnt suggest an upgrade. if you dont plan on editing much then maybe the new built in wifi/ NFC can save you some time, but as far as producing images with a discernable difference in quality i would say no way. this is why im saying the camer is purchase is better for those moving from a mk2 or similar or looking to move into full frame for wide angle use.

[@purenupe1]

+Michael Andrew you need for 1 extra stop of DR may be more desireable than most. but in my opinion the act of shelling out $3500 to get images that are 98% the same as those you can create on the mrk 3 with little to no work flow improvement seems wasteful. just my 2 cents

[@sonyp180]

Reference 6mins 40secs... You can remap the DOF preview button on front of camera on the 5Dmkiii to change focus option between alservo and oneshot focus. I have it set so focus is normally in oneshot and when i hold down the DOF preview button it will select alservo mode for as long as its held down.

[@SarahLdk]

I have a canon 600d crop camera with a canon 50 mm 1.8 lens. I want to upgrade to full frame and I was thinking the mark iv with the 24 70 2.8 lens. I photograph kids, newborn, babies, maternity, family and portraits. Was wondering if I should save a little and go for the iii instead. I am not going to use video. I want good and fast autofocus, because most kids (toddlers) are moving a lot. And I want to be able to use high iso without grain for outside on cloudy days. I want sharpness. My only concern with the 24 70 2.8 lens is the lack of IS. But now I don't know if I should go for the iii or iv? Help! :-D

[@Prideofthepacific808]

So basically the 5d mark III for photography, and 5d mark IV for video , not gonna lie that 120fps and 720p is pretty sweet

[@tylersapp4240]

Love the MK IV. Thanks for the video, this is great!

[@layZ2BPnoy]

5D mk IV is a well-rounded & truly amazing camera ... if it came out 2 years ago. At this point, it's only worth an upgrade if you're heavily invested in Canon glass & don't like the performance of adapters onto a Sony camera. Nikon FF has IMHO the best selection of FF DSLR cameras. For mirrorless, go Sony. They're lens selection is finally being expanded & will likely have a more complete line-up by the next year or so.

[@leealexander7538]

I've been shooting with my 5D Mark III for the last few years. Really Great in low light. I shoot alot of weddings, Portfolios, and different functions I don't really do too much video. After listening to this review and seeing it some pics, Not really worth the Upgrade for me at this time especially with the older card format still being used on it. Thanks Jared.

[@Delboy2911]

I've a MK III that I've had from new and am normally an early adopter - I think I'll go the the IV - Looking forward t the full review

[@morbly]

I don't know, I shoot landscapes mostly. It would be nice to have better autofocus than my 6D for the occasional cycling event or other fast moving subject but I don't absolutely need it. The 5Dsr and D810 seem rather attractive to me.

[@HyunRalphJeong]

Still rocking mk i. New canons are just not worth the $$$

[@ChrisWilliams8301]

So my big dilemma is between the 5d mk iv vs the 5dsr, next video?