As a Medieval Warrior, I thought we trained to form up in various formations and drills, but then when the battle commenced we break formation and fight each other individually. Meanwhile arrows penetrate our scale, mail, brigandine, gambeson and plate armor. Also, everything is dark and grim with a blue tint, and I'm wearing a helmet from the year 1066, with a curiass from 1450.
@Liquidsback19 сағат бұрын
Not to mention my arming sword just cleaves thorugh plated Knights like butter.
@cyclo_baz38425 сағат бұрын
@@Liquidsback Arming sword? I did it with a dagger, are you sure you're from the Middle Ages?
@Liquidsback5 сағат бұрын
@@cyclo_baz3842 Ah you are from the Italian school. Tell me who goes your war with the Normans in the South and the Ottomans in the east?
@johnrambo57954 сағат бұрын
@@Liquidsback The celts intervined and send the Ottomans running
@Red-kc2wow23 сағат бұрын
As a roman soldier, I say those "formations" doesnt exist. We just run into each others lines
@PYRESATVARANASI3 сағат бұрын
The Byzantine training manuals are such a classic example of the Roman ability to preserve generations of knowledge. Such a beautiful thing to study such a long lasting tradition of historical preservation.
@Satria-lv8qk4 сағат бұрын
Kings and Generals will never ever dissappoint. It's a miracle we have such great content for free here, I never skip Kings and Generals ads because even though im broke, it's the least I can do. I know we can only hear the narrator in all these videos, but I applaude to the entire team for their hardwork and contribution!
@KingsandGenerals4 сағат бұрын
Thank you!
@Findinavia16 сағат бұрын
The real Roman legacy for me is restoring the Empire in every game the “Byzantine Empire” is a playable faction in or downloading mods that make the empire exist in space
@MrTohawk4 сағат бұрын
excited for Project Caesar yet?
@PYRESATVARANASI3 сағат бұрын
Yes ❤
@SaguntoYT19 сағат бұрын
Hugh quality content as always. By far the best channel dedicated to military history on KZbin. Huge thanks from Brazil 🇧🇷
@quibblequois24364 сағат бұрын
I think it is really interesting how this channel is not just talking about battles and other historical event, but also giving us food for thoughts. I would have never assume that centuries of knowelge would just disapear beacause an entity disappear, but I never really thought about it. Thank you for this video, a really good job!
@AlphariusJingYuan4 сағат бұрын
Kinda interesting how medieval tactics and strategies were based off not only circumstances, but also (mostly) improved templates from earlier times. They gradually improved and adapted accordingly, just like the Romans in 753 BC up to 1453 AD.
@Ccdddttt4 сағат бұрын
Happy Sunday morning!! Amazing work!
@antoniobautista67184 сағат бұрын
People forget that in the West, the Holy Roman Empire was seen not as a new empire, but a legitimate successor of the Western Roman Empire in the eyes of their contemporaries, and the emperors during its height of power (9th - 13th century, arguably 14th century as well) in the West were very aware of their promoted imperial legacy and connections. You could clearly see this in effect with the Ottonians and later developed and improved by the Salians and Hohenstaufen with the system of burgs and the Heerbann. The Ottonians helped establish systematic a defense-in-depth composed of various burgs (fortifications) in vulnerable areas of the Empire, and employed the Heerbann, which was a mixed mobile army with a elite cavalry retinue. The Salians and Hohenstaufen would continue and develop this doctrine, and would increasingly supplement the Heerbann with imperial household troops and mercenaries as time went on. Although clearly not at the level of logistics and mobilization of the former Western Empire, you can clearly see the inspiration and the source for this doctrine from the Dominate era Western Empire with its limes fortifications with their limitanei defenders, and mobile armies of the comitatenses with the elite Scholae Palatinae cavalry forces assisting them.
@samuelmargueret96265 сағат бұрын
Everything is here ... the quality the naration everything is perfect .... plus bringing a topic like this , i would Never though that romans military books inspired techniques for early armies of middel age !!! Content is insane on this channel !!
@Unammedacc8 сағат бұрын
Just the cavalry charges performed by knights were really complex tactics, requirring high training and cohesion ^^ !
@krystofcisar4695 сағат бұрын
true.. its often simplyfied but anyone who ever sat on horse must admire coordination liek that.
@gbendicion70524 сағат бұрын
K&G pumping out Roman videos is amazing!
@georgebest125 сағат бұрын
Incredible quality.
@KingsandGenerals5 сағат бұрын
Thanks
@Earthnevevo42 минут бұрын
I love exploring how the world of Antiquity still influenced the way people conducted society and warfare in ways like this. Thank you so much for bringing this to our attention. o7
@jonbaxter22543 сағат бұрын
K&G with my daily reminder to think about the Roman Empire...
@eondara8519Сағат бұрын
Best comment here 😂😂😂
@TorvusVae4 сағат бұрын
@8:30 Devin says "Ottoman", but what I think you meant was "Ottonian"
@szabolcsmate77903 сағат бұрын
Passed my Roman law exem. I can enjoy roman history again.
@KingsandGenerals3 сағат бұрын
Nice
@andersschmich86003 сағат бұрын
It would be interesting do a video on Persian and Roman influences on Arab armies of the same time.
@alexandrugheorghe56103 сағат бұрын
I'm broke, though grateful to everyone who's sustaining this channel. 🙏🏻
@mrcraftiest3 сағат бұрын
I see 'Kings and Generals' i click
@KingsandGenerals3 сағат бұрын
Thanks!
@KingsandGenerals6 сағат бұрын
🎥 Watch more than 200+ other exclusive videos on youtube: kzbin.info/door/MmaBzfCCwZ2KqaBJjkj0fwjoin or patreon: www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals. Support us on Paypal www.paypal.com/paypalme/kingsandgenerals as well!
@MrTohawk4 сағат бұрын
It has to be said though that the Ottones were real Romaboos. More than the average noble at the time. So it's no wonder they were more aware of roman texts, tactical ones included
@mihajlo789354 минут бұрын
The art of war..maybe is time for the art of peace..salute K&G thank you for greatest videos...
@cyrus_vasileСағат бұрын
as a Roumainean it feels great to hear my country name
@abcdef276693 сағат бұрын
“Roma Vult!”. - Sir Biggus Dickus, Legionary-Knight.
@Faolan034 сағат бұрын
6:53 you put Vienna, the capital of Austria, north of freising, a city in central Bavaria? It's the same with Metz, it's waaay to far north. Still awesome video!
@mikered19744 сағат бұрын
Yeah , Vienna , Austria is under Roman controlled land which later settled by Remnants of Ostrogoths and other Germanic tribes.
@jacobscott14334 минут бұрын
It must of taken some self control not to give Vegetius some spiky hair
@vitorbenevenuto72144 сағат бұрын
Great content as always!
@LogicaetRatio-r8z4 сағат бұрын
Make an episode about the Merovingian period of the Frankish kingdom
@noone47003 сағат бұрын
Excellent video, would love to see more of this!
@Gufupandi09th132 сағат бұрын
After hearing upcoming fantasy show welcome to noxus like they are inspired from Roman empire right.?
@RosierJulio3 сағат бұрын
Un video de las guerras marcomanas
@KingsandGenerals3 сағат бұрын
Will get there
@scottpankonin10685 сағат бұрын
Good summary of Vegitius and how widely and how early he was circulated. I always thought his influence was only much later in the Middle Ages. Great video, That being said, CE/BCE notation is revisionist bullshit. It would be far better to take the more neutral road of omitting AD/CE entirely.
@Musa39620Сағат бұрын
لماذا لم تنزل اخبار عن ح؟؟:_(رب رو(_-&سيا
@markuhler26642 сағат бұрын
So once again the years from roughly 400 to 1600 shouldn't be described as the dark ages but merely as the middle ages. Who would have thought?
@KingsandGenerals2 сағат бұрын
That is why historians exist. To further our understanding.
@reokobalta88394 сағат бұрын
Please use the proper B.C and A.D when referencing dates.
@gingerbill1283 сағат бұрын
Agreed.
@samuelkenney58553 сағат бұрын
To play devil’s advocate here, it’s technically the exact same dating system. B.C. & A.D. just sound cooler.
@tripsaplenty12272 сағат бұрын
Probably redo all of it. Having a year 0 in the middle of timeline really makes no sense.
@KingsandGenerals2 сағат бұрын
There is no year 0 in either system.
@tripsaplenty12272 сағат бұрын
@@KingsandGenerals Then that makes even less sense to go from -1 to 1.
@janlindtner3052 сағат бұрын
👍👍👍
@Mr.KaganbYaltrk5 сағат бұрын
Legions were the best roman armies but respect to the knights
@johnrambo57954 сағат бұрын
I am gonna be real, a Legion would probably loose against a high medieval army
@Mr.KaganbYaltrk4 сағат бұрын
@johnrambo5795 i didnt mean to compare them but yes they would lose to the knights. ANYWAYS Legions were legendary
@rennor34984 сағат бұрын
@@johnrambo5795 Yes. Knights were subjected to a discinplinary initiation process from a young age into both the theoretical and practical arts of medieval warfare, which included studying Roman tactics and warfare, as well the customary laws of their respective realm, ecclesiastical law and the Code of Chivalry - starting from the 11 century onwards. They were taught to fight both in formation on foot, on horseback and individually in duels. Not to mention that beginning from the 10 the centiry, the armor and equipment which a knight would have been customary to wear and fight in would have been more advanced than the best Roman armor at the peak of the Empire or during the fall in 5th century A.D. A Roman gladius (most well known sabre used by the Romans being the Gladius Hispanicus - a peace of technology adopted and perfected from the Hispanic tribes during the Roman Conquest of Iberia) would have ricochated or bent upon a hard contact with the chainmail armor of a knight, while a knights sword could have been able to cut through a Roman shield and penetrate the armor. The strength of the Romans was their discipline ability to fight in formation and arrange a series of defensive or offensive formations to overcome the various situations brought upon them by enemy forces , but in single combat they were relatively weak.
@1peidu4 сағат бұрын
@@johnrambo5795probably because late medieval armies had cannons. This is like debating if Rommel would beat Napoleon: very obviously yes because Rommel had tanks
@johnrambo57953 сағат бұрын
@@1peidu no. Has nothing to Do with Cannobs
@nellym466644 сағат бұрын
Of course a dude named Vegitius was involved in military affairs🤣
@Rage44114 минут бұрын
Ce? You mean AD
@collinsmutethia51982 сағат бұрын
When is the Ukraine war video coming? Am too anxious
@Musa39620Сағат бұрын
خسارت ما بعد خسارت لا يريدون ان ينشرو الفشل
@ВладГусельников-ы1щ29 минут бұрын
Тоже жду. Интересно послушать альтернативное мнение ( даже если оно мне не нравится)
@Lee-vk1xy3 сағат бұрын
Points off for refering to Karl the Great (or Karl der Grosse) as the bastardization of his name i.e. Charlemagne.
@KingsandGenerals3 сағат бұрын
So, points off for using the naming convention that is used in the vast majority of history books?
@Lee-vk1xyСағат бұрын
@@KingsandGenerals Since it violates the standard conventions of English (at least the ones I learned) and wasn't his name, indeed never used during his lifetime, and furthermore is misleading, yes. Although not many ... should have put a smile face on that. One of my pet peeves like people misusing the term "decimate".
@KingsandGenerals54 минут бұрын
Do you have the same zeal about us using Alexander and not Alexandros, or is it selective?
@Lee-vk1xy41 минут бұрын
@@KingsandGenerals Somewhat selective I guess. Alexander and Alexandros are reasonably close but I'd prefer the latter. Karl and Charlemagne aren't as close and the latter is somewhat misleading as it gives people the impression he was French as opposed to Germanic. In general I'd prefer to hear and use names as close to the original as possible although in most cases I'm probably unaware of how they were pronounced. For instance I only recently became aware of the Latin pronunciation of Caesar and will likely mispronounce it a fair few times in the future in spite of that.
@DrKarmo5 сағат бұрын
Anno Domini*
@KevinGomez-kg5jl5 сағат бұрын
💯
@johnrambo57954 сағат бұрын
Both is right.
@slamdunktiger19 минут бұрын
Wow, with they kind of video title….
@PJDAltamirus04253 сағат бұрын
Yeah, even more simplier tactics at visual could be explained by army size. The less men you have at your disposal the less you can do, especially the communication tech available. Lots of things we think as must do make less with smaller numbers and less standardized equipment. Also, the Romans just didn't have to deal with the same times Medieval armies did.
@ankundamwebembezi63583 сағат бұрын
Early medieval armies resembled alot like late roman legionnaires
@Kaiyanwang823 сағат бұрын
Fascinating.
@uria36792 сағат бұрын
Glad more people are starting to realize that legionnaires were the first generation of knights
@KingsandGenerals2 сағат бұрын
I don't think this video comes to that conclusion.
@syahali9795 сағат бұрын
first
@GHAITIsmail30 минут бұрын
Where is the ukraine war video ?
@sergeipohkerova72114 сағат бұрын
As a thought experiment I wonder how a Roman legion in its prime would fare against a Medieval army of roughly equal size. Even with the Medieval army's likely superior cavalry element, I feel like the Roman army would curb-stomp.
@BassPlayer6013438 минут бұрын
Knock off the CE crap. It’s just plain stupid.
@drsm79475 сағат бұрын
When the West Roman Empire stop using pilum or javaline they become weak
@KingsandGenerals5 сағат бұрын
no correlation
@pastorofmuppets93463 сағат бұрын
Im pretty sure comitatenses and plumbatarii etc used em till the end. Ofc their numbers did go down a lot
@AdrianMartinez-ho6db3 сағат бұрын
What’s yalls favorite army before the days of firearms and gun powder? Mine is the mongols then the Spartans then the Romans
@mostar96735 сағат бұрын
The Roman Empire fell after the fall of Rome, the byzantines weren’t Roman’s they were Greeks. I hate that the Byzantines are looked at as the carriers of Roman Legacy.
@dasauce91474 сағат бұрын
COPE
@Eagle-jj5qd4 сағат бұрын
Because they themselves considered themselves Roman...
@damjankrstevski224 сағат бұрын
You are either a greek ultra-nationalist, or simply illiterate in late Roman antiquity..
@Nefferious3 сағат бұрын
That's because they WERE the carriers of that legacy. They might have been (primarily) Greeks, (there weren't only Greeks in the Eastern Roman empire, throughout the centuries it encompassed many other peoples, including even some Latin speaking populations up to a point in time), but that doesn't mean they weren't Romans. To be "Roman" did not mean "speaking Latin and hailing from the region of Italy". If that were the case, most of the notable Roman historical figures aren't really Romans either.