Front in the rear of the enemy, Part One | WAR DRAMA

Front in the rear of the enemy, Part One | WAR DRAMA | FULL MOVIE

Рет қаралды 144,714

Күн бұрын

Part Two: • Front in the rear of t...
Based on the novel by Semyon Tsvigun "We will return." The third film in the trilogy (“Front without flanks”, “Front behind the front line”) about the combat operations of a special forces detachment under the command of Colonel Mlynsky in the rear of Nazi troops in 1944-1945.
Year of production: 1981
Directors: Gostev Igor, Glazkov Vladimir
Writers: Dneprov Semyon, Glazkov Vladimir
Composer: Basner Veniamin
Operator: Kharitonov Alexander
Production designers: Volkov Stalen, Voleman Ales, Reska Heinz
Cast: Strzhelchik Vladislav, Nazarov Yuri, Shulgin Victor, Mikhailov Alexander, Dyachkov Leonid, Solodova Elizaveta, Tikhonov Vyacheslav, Khimichev Boris, Butkevich Paul, Lapikov Ivan, Leonov-Gladyshev Evgeniy, Vladimirov Igor, Matveev Evgeniy, Kokshenov Mikhail, Ryazanova Raisa, Zaklunnaya Valeria, Polyakov Lev, Kosykh Ivan, Kobaladze Andro, Mirzoev Tofik, Kuzmina Elena, Ivanov Alexander, Kosykh Victor, Lichman Boguslav, Krampol Jiri, Ananina Valentina, Begalin Nartai, Veyrostakh Mikhail, Bekeris Vilnis, Bielogradski Karel, Giese Horst, Gyuchov Gert , Jelinek Rudolf, Kaplanova Dita, Mainalite Vaiva, Matyushevsky Mikhail, Pitch Harry, Riemann Lutz, Robenkova Yana, Sergeev Filimon, Spols Milan, Tiede Erich, Philip Adolf, Fomin Nikolay, Hasse Hanno, Shveglik Alois, Frichinsky Lev

Пікірлер: 43

@christopherhusbands6481 10 ай бұрын

Thank you again for bringing these films to a wider international audience.

@999soareagle 6 ай бұрын

I am a great fan of these movies: educational, realistic and totally absorbing.

@Anna-xh2mo 10 ай бұрын

Thank you. The heroic Red Army will never be forgotten.

@secretagent86 10 ай бұрын

What a difference between defending your homeland and invading another nation

@sinyachelloff 9 ай бұрын

@@secretagent86 а сам допетрить не можешь, тыковка?

@ОльгаСавченкова-г7и 9 ай бұрын

@@secretagent86 Очень большая разница. Защитник Родины защищают людей будь какой национальности, и мирное население .И как сказал молодой поляк на лошади: ,,пока червона (красная армия с нами ,мы ничего не боимся". А захватчики ,окупанты убивают, захватывают чужие земли, убивают мирное население (детей, стариков, женщин , отбирают у них продукты ,животных, домашнюю птицу (уток, гусей ,кур ,коров ,свиней и тут же режут и жрут, а люди местное население остаются голодными.Окупанты вагоняют местное мирное население с их домов жить на улице ,во хлеву.... Советский же солдат заботится о мирных людях ,о детях....

@alexthewildcard3886 10 ай бұрын

What a gem, hidden behind language, finally brought to light, thank you!

@erroneous6947 10 ай бұрын

This was excellent. Thank you.

@Perl_Kolesnikova1943 10 ай бұрын

Gracias por el trabajo de traducción, hace algunas semanas había visto las partes previas y me quedé con la curiosidad de seguir viendo el resto. 😊

@user-zs2ue9yx3o 9 ай бұрын

Soviet Ww2 movies is very awesome. I haven’t watched properly. But I watched a battle and do a English dubbed

@erroneous6947 10 ай бұрын

I like that the old man was mad at him not for getting the woman pregnant, but for not sending her home to protect her and the baby. Solid culture.

@shahlabadel8628 10 ай бұрын

Solid indeed!

@soumyadiptamajumder8795 8 ай бұрын

The V-1 was a simple, crude, and most of all cheap means of delivering explosives where they did hurt, and it could be fuelled from anything from old socks to liquefied coal and waste oil. V-1 was easy to mass produce, it had a good payload, it was reasonably fast, and it was simple enough to be produced by semi-skilled labour. The warhead consisted of 850 kg of Amatol, 52A+ high-grade blast-effective explosive with three fuses. An electrical fuse could be triggered by nose or belly impact. Another fuse was a slow-acting mechanical fuse allowing deeper penetration into the ground, regardless of the altitude. The third fuse was a delayed action fuse, set to go off two hours after launch. The airframe was designed under the codename Kirschkern (cherry stone) by Lusser and Gosslau, with a fuselage constructed mainly of welded sheet steel and wings built of plywood. Building one airframe took less than a day to construct. The simple, Argus-built pulsejet engine pulsed 50 times per second, following the three-stroke Lenoir cycle, and the characteristic buzzing sound gave rise to the colloquial names "buzz bomb" or "doodlebug" (a common name for a wide variety of flying insects). It was known briefly in Germany (on Hitler's orders) as Maikäfer (Maybug) and Krähe (crow). Its major components included the nacelle, fuel jets, flap valve grid, mixing chamber venturi, tail pipe, and spark plug. Compressed air rather than a fuel pump forced the fuel from the 640 litre fuel tank through the fuel jets which consisted of three banks of three atomizers. These nine atomizing nozzles were in front of the air inlet valve system where it mixed with air before entering the chamber. A throttle valve, connected to altitude and ram pressure instruments, controlled fuel flow. A spring-controlled flap valve system provided an efficient straight path for incoming air. The flaps momentarily closed after each explosion, the resultant gas compressed in the venturi chamber, and its tapered portion accelerated the exhaust gases creating thrust. Maximum speed was 640 km/h, flying between 600 and 900 m of altitude. An odometer driven by a vane anemometer on the nose determined when the target area had been reached. Before launch, it was set to count backwards from a value that would reach zero upon arrival at the target in the prevailing wind conditions. As the missile flew, the airflow turned the propeller, and every 30 rotations of the propeller counted down one number on the odometer. This odometer triggered the arming of the warhead after about 60 km When the count reached zero, two detonating bolts were fired. Two spoilers on the elevator were released, the linkage between the elevator and servo was jammed, and a guillotine device cut off the control hoses to the rudder servo, setting the rudder in neutral. These actions put the V-1 into a steep dive. Initially, V-1s landed within a circle 31 km (19 mi) in diameter, but by the end of the war, accuracy had been improved to about 11 km (7 mi), which was comparable to the V-2 rocket. The RLM at first planned to use a radio control system with the V-1 for precision attacks, but the government decided instead to use the missile against London. So why was this slowish, crude, cheapo flying bomb - the grand-daddy of all cruise missiles - far more successful than the amazing Wunderwaffe - the V-2? Simply because it provided far more bang for the buck. The development programme was made by one single minor aircraft company - Fieseler - and was put from the drawing board to action in less than one year. When submitted to the Luftwaffe on 5 June 1942, the specifications included a range of 299 km , a speed of 700 km/h, and capable of delivering a 500-kilogram warhead. Project Fieseler Fi 103 was approved on 19 June. Milch awarded Argus the contract for the engine, Fieseler the airframe, and Askania the guidance system. By 30 August, Fieseler had completed the first fuselage, and the first flight of the Fi 103 V7 took place on 10 December 1942, when it was airdropped by a Fw 200. Then on Christmas Eve, the V-1 flew 900 m, for about a minute, after a ground launch. In July 1943, the V-1 flew 245 kilometres and impacted within a kilometre of its target, carrying a 850 kg warhead instead of the designed 500 kg. The V-1 was amazingly cheap. It cost only 5000 Reichsmark - only 10% of a G7a torpedo or a Panzer IV tank, and 2% of a V-2 rocket. Some 50 V-1 bombs could be built on the cost of one V-2. Moreover, V-1 did not have the tendency of going haywire once launched nor explode on the launch pad, and it did not require 20 tonnes of potatoes to make the fuel. The V-1 was a shock when it first emerged. The British countermeasures were effective - they put all the available fast aircraft, including new Hawker Tempest, Spitfire XIV and Gloster Meteor jets to intercept the missiles, and all available anti-aircraft guns and barrage balloons - and some 80% of all V-1 bombs were either intercepted or diverted off course. But it means still that 20% - one in five - found their targets. The only effective countermeasure was the Operation Crossbow - aerial bombardment of the V-1 launch sites. This led into launching of the V-1 bombs off aircraft and makeshift platforms. The conventional launch sites could theoretically launch about 15 V-1s per day, but this rate was difficult to achieve on a consistent basis; the maximum rate achieved was 18. Overall, only about 20% of the V-1s hit their targets, the majority being lost because of a combination of defensive measures, mechanical unreliability or guidance errors. With the capture or destruction of the launch facilities used to attack England, the V-1s were employed in attacks against strategic points in Belgium. All in all, the whole V-1 programme cost Germany only a fraction of the V-2 programme and production run of the V-1 missiles was amazingly cheap. In total, 10,492 V1s were launched against Britain, with a nominal aiming point of Tower Bridge. 4,261 V-1s had been destroyed by fighters, anti-aircraft fire and barrage balloons. Approximately 2,400 V-1s landed within Greater London, inflicting 6,000 fatalities and 18,000 serious injuries. The last enemy action of any kind on British soil occurred on 29 March 1945, when a V-1 struck Datchworth in Hertfordshire. After the WWII, the USAAF technical personnel reverse-engineered the V-1 from the remains of one that had failed to detonate in Britain and the Republic-Ford JB-2 “Loon” drone was being delivered by early 1945. After the end of the war in Europe it was in consideration for use against Japan. General Hap Arnold of the United States Army Air Forces was concerned that this weapon could be built of steel and wood, in 2,000 man-hours and 600 dollars. To put this in perspective, a single Boeing B-29 Superfortress airframe (based on program costs) cost about 126 times as much per ton of explosive delivered, not including the much higher costs for injured or killed aircrew, fuel, maintenance, bombs, ammunition, repairs, training and accidents, and despite being reusable, almost never accomplished enough missions to even approach covering just the production costs.

@isharaudayangawimalaweera3642 10 ай бұрын

Lovely job. Thank you very much

@shahlabadel8628 10 ай бұрын

Thanks mosfilm as always. Loved it!

@zenfiragulueva6855 4 ай бұрын

Гасан Алиев 😢😢😢и все герои нашей Родины Вечная память 😢😢😢😢

@andrejmucic5003 10 ай бұрын

I love it! Great film.

@theprofiler8531 9 ай бұрын

For some reason I like Russian wwii movies

@ОльгаСавченкова-г7и 9 ай бұрын

Потому что они про жизнь и про подвиг ,который был на самом деле. А не выдуманная голивудская гадость. Советские люди ,геройский народ.❤

@ericwinnert 9 ай бұрын

Just watched Front Without Flanks. According to Wikipedia this film is the third in the trilogy. The second is Front Beyond the Front Line. Will Mosfilm upload the second one soon?

@geraldhagen2989 10 ай бұрын

Fantastic war movies...

@NataliaNovikova-h3t 7 ай бұрын

Все такие умные, живите на своей земле.

@DarrKernow 9 ай бұрын

Excellent 4 part series! If I may ask a question? Often Colonel Mlynsky is referred to as Ivan Petrovich, this slightly confuses me 😕

@kolasillers7776 9 ай бұрын

Russian culture. Ivan's his name and Petrovitch his fathers name.

@ОльгаСавченкова-г7и 9 ай бұрын

А пусть вас не смущают наши прекрасные имена; Иваном его назвали при рождении ,а Петром был у него отец, вот он и Иван Петрович.❤ А когда человека уважают ,то его называют по имени и отчеству: Иван Петрович ... Отчество -это имя его родного отца (папы и тут за этим кроется величие человека. Иван ,Ваня его зовут родные , а остальные называют по имени и отчеству ,когда у нас человек становится взрослым....

@user-dq9wm4dd8t 8 ай бұрын

Псевдоним😅😅😅😅

@jashandeepsingh6402 10 ай бұрын

That's an interesting movie name (if you know what I'm sayin)

@TomGuideKrakowPoland 8 ай бұрын

thx

@yevgenliubart7658 8 ай бұрын

6.I.2024 Виктор Георгиевич Куликов , друг (1941г.) ст. лейтенанта Грудаова Алексадра Адреевича по военному артилерийскму училищу и который был мужем моей матери Любарт Александры Ивановны .....

@linaa3469 16 күн бұрын

❤❤❤