If you liked this video, consider giving it a thumbs up. It really helps with the KZbin algorithm. Thanks! If you have any questions, feel free to ask. FSR 3.1 is now available in a few games - community.amd.com/t5/gaming/amd-fsr-3-1-now-available-fsr-3-available-and-upcoming-in-60/ba-p/692000
@thomaseruchie12623 ай бұрын
any image quality difference?
@FrozburnYT3 ай бұрын
@@thomaseruchie1262 A bit less shimmering, seems to have more ghosting and the "haze" effect is still there (not as clear as DLSS, especially in games with lots of detail), plus there's issues like this water 0:55 and the rain looks weird in that game as well. Overall it is a lot better now. Hopefully they improve it even further in the future.
@holland13 ай бұрын
@@FrozburnYT whats your thought on 7900xtx vs 4080 super I have the 7800xt but struggles with single player games at 4k (more demanding titles for most its fine) I know the 7900xtx is better performance wise but is spending 150 more for less performance but better upscaling worth it ?
@FrozburnYT3 ай бұрын
@@holland1 If you can find the 4080 Super for a similar price as the 7900 XTX I'd go for that. You say you want to play 4K games, I assume you also like ray tracing (it's quite good in many games). The reason to go NVIDIA is that FSR is missing in most games (or not updated) same goes for their frame gen, whereas DLSS is almost everywhere and you can update it yourself by changing the file. There's also ray reconstruction in Cyberpunk etc. Definitely go for the 4080 Super if you don't mind the price difference. Better upscaler, better drivers is also a plus. Not sure if you care about Shadowplay but that's also good, they recently released the NVIDIA App, AV1 support etc. The 7900 XTX is quite good for raster, but falls a bit behind in 4K with ray tracing.
@devonmarr98723 ай бұрын
This is a huge win for all PC gamers since the tech is not locked by brand. It's also great that we have several companies pushing their tech so nobody can get complacent with where they are at. Something AMD was criticized for a while.
@FrozburnYT3 ай бұрын
Competition is always so important. We all lose when there's none.
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
😂😂😂 this is another junk 😂😂😂 WTF u talking about kid? What is your GPU if you have one 😂😂😂
@nathanlamaire3 ай бұрын
@@OmnianMIU cry harder in more replies
@devonmarr98723 ай бұрын
@@OmnianMIU I hope making fun of people who are interested in tech makes you feel fullfilled.
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
@@nathanlamaire no i'm not crying with RTX 4070 😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂 You AMDolls still ceying with bugged t@rdeon graphic cards😂😂😂🎪
@arico79233 ай бұрын
I tried fsr3.1 on horizon forbidden west and was really impressed. I can't tell the difference between it and dlss. The frame generation is also very smooth. This is a big win for all gpu owners
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
Oh really?😮 and what about DLSS? 😂😂😂
@arico79233 ай бұрын
@@OmnianMIU the dlss is also good. Slightly better than fsr but AMD GPU owners aren't missing out much any longer
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
@@arico7923 "slightly"? Are blind? Wich is the games you tried for DLSS and FSR? Latest versions of DLSS are something of 🤯 do you know what is DLDSR? The final quality you can get with an RTX is something that radeon cards can only dream
@arico79233 ай бұрын
@@OmnianMIU no I am not blind. You have your opinion and I have mine and I am talking about what I saw in horizon forbidden west.
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
@@arico7923 wich is the resolution do you use? What level of FSR and DLSS?
@theransomgamer3 ай бұрын
It's win win situation can't complain anymore, hats off AMD you won our heart ❤
@blizyon30fps863 ай бұрын
And then you realize most games don’t support fsr frame gen yet
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
Are you really dumbo? 😂 won for what? 😂😂😂 for this pathetic junk?? Wich is your gpu kid??😂😂
@sunsetwave10333 ай бұрын
@@blizyon30fps86 Nothing is worse, right?
@goregejones72483 ай бұрын
@@blizyon30fps86if you have amd GPU then you can use fluid motion in every game
@blizyon30fps863 ай бұрын
@@goregejones7248 not every. I looked it up and most of those were mods
@SethOmegaful3 ай бұрын
Pretty good. Nice work, AMD.
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
Pretty junk 😂😂😂😂 RTX ON 💚
@Bleen_xz3 ай бұрын
@@OmnianMIU fanboy🤡
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
@@Bleen_xz yes, i'm fanboy of the RTX because is the best choice for now, in any price tag. All trashdeon cards on the market at the moment are all obsolete peace of garbage without right support to new gen of games with new engine with RT always on. I'm a fanboy of the best product of the market 😘
@sunsetwave10333 ай бұрын
@@OmnianMIU brother please don't let your autism show so much ;)
@_mato_91453 ай бұрын
@@OmnianMIU Clap, clap sheep guy... 😉
@C0manso3 ай бұрын
Thanks for testing the latest DLSS DLL aswell, not sure many have done this. They tend to just use whatever the game packages. Was it preset E for the 3.7.10 aswell? Apologies if I missed it in the video, but I don't think it was specified. EDIT: I'd be interested to see lower quality presets in another video aswell, such as performance since you're at 4K. I think the lower input resolutions show even further the differences between FSR/DLSS.
@FrozburnYT3 ай бұрын
I didn't swap the preset but yes, 3.7.10 should be preset E by default. I haven't tried lower resolutions or lower than Quality yet.
@croat0312 ай бұрын
After seeing this, don’t understand the fuss about dlss. Will buy AMD card.
@sneakyfart13372 ай бұрын
0:58 the shimmering/ghosting is very bad for FSR, look at water and the particle trails, otherwise FSR is doing a very good job
@paul1979uk20003 ай бұрын
There are a few differences in favour of DLSS but nothing major and honestly, the quality has got to the point that it doesn't really matter to most gamers. With that said, I wouldn't really use upscaling unless the base resolution is 1440p as none of these upscalers look that great at 1080p or lower, but at 1440p or above, they all look competent, but the exception is portable gaming devices with much smaller screens, you can probably afford to lower the resolution, and same with frame gen, For me personally, FSR 3.1 is good enough now with upscaling and frame gen that DLSS isn't a selling point any more.
@erickalvarez64863 ай бұрын
Agreed, they should have "ultra quality" so base render is not 67% of 1080p but rather 80% or 75% and would look better ar 1080p.
@1989rs5003 ай бұрын
Well at 4k with a big screen say 43 inch and above U ll notice DLSS 2 be noticeably better. Thata where I think Nvidias premium still geta my justification nod
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
FStRash still junk RTX ON 💚
@mouaaddahmou649313 күн бұрын
@@OmnianMIUjust stfu, amd is better for gaming
@aapzehrsteurer90003 ай бұрын
If you have an Nvidia card and you want to have the best of both worlds: use ReShade or another 3rd party shader injector to inject CAS sharpening, then just use DLSS in your game. You should basically end up with DLSS with the crispness of FSR.
@Fer-75103 ай бұрын
Well, I can't see any difference now
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
RTX ON💚
@Fer-75103 ай бұрын
@@OmnianMIU RTX is just Nvidia branding, calling Ray Tracing “RTX” is mere ignorance
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
@@Fer-7510 really? 😂😂😂 OK CHAMP 😂😂😂 RTX ON 💚
@Fer-75103 ай бұрын
@@OmnianMIU okay, if you say so … Nvidiot 💀
@Fer-75103 ай бұрын
@@OmnianMIU okay Nvidiot 💀
@stevelo20573 ай бұрын
I cannot tell the difference
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
Yes, because you are another dumbo ret ard fan AMDesperation without an RTX 😂😂😂 and saying bullshit under a compressed video on youtube 🤡 but in real life things changes 🤡🤡🤡 Loser AMD umb
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
AMD esperation fan 😂😂😂😂 get a life poor ign rant 😂😂😂 RTX ON 💚
@stevelo20573 ай бұрын
@@OmnianMIU I am not fans of any Brand, Nvidia fans: RTX on and AMD sucks. Happy? So sensitive 😂😂😂
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
@@stevelo2057 ahahahahahahahhahahahahaha LMFAO yes 😂😂😂 love this♥️ I'm joking of course 😘
@ThePenhalionsPost3 ай бұрын
Nicely done. I've seen a few channels trying to drama it and nitpick but whenI've done a side by side on my own AMD 7900xtx (my gaming pc) vs a 4070 super (on my dev pc) there is no noticable difference in quality anymore. In fact the AMD fsr may be a little sharper to my eyes. Now if AMD can just get the path tracing into their new cards we are golden. I'm looking at you Dragon's Dogma 2 😉
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂 get a life poor fan AMDesperation RTX ON
@Nicolas-di2mz3 ай бұрын
@@OmnianMIU ur so damn annoying you have over 300 comments trashtalking AMD, get over It bud Only NVidia cards that AMD cant catch UP are 4080 super and 4090, the rest AMD is winning It ALL and no one gives a damn about Ray tracing
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
@@Nicolas-di2mz ahahahhahahahaha more crying from another AMDesperation 😂😂😂😂 ok champ, but 80% of people in the world doesn't agree with your trash comment 😘 all trashdeon cards still junk after your comment 💪🏼
@ThePenhalionsPost3 ай бұрын
@@OmnianMIU Yea. Yet everyone, even those trying to trash fsr 3.1 are saying that the image and texture clarity is better with it. Looks like the only person needing to get to spec savers is you. Ouch.
@Storlans3 ай бұрын
I cant really see a difference between DLSS and FSR when its in motion.
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
RTX ON 💚
@leonel28673 ай бұрын
Only particles, but I needed to pay extra attention to notice lol. Big win for AMD
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
@@Storlans 😂🤣😂🤣😂
@viewsan3 ай бұрын
FSR 3.1 has ghosting in the river at Horizon and the air particles leave behind a trail
@Storlans3 ай бұрын
@@viewsan yeah but so does Dlss but it does look better on dlss.
@SaerosXXI3 ай бұрын
What I noticed while playing with FSR and DLSS frame generation turned on is a sort of halo around the character when moving the camera fast. It’s easier to see this artifact in FSR than DLSS, but it’s amazing to have this feature available for any graphics card now and I'm sure it will improve over time.
@noc443 ай бұрын
Am I really see artifacts on HFW's waters on FSR 3.1 or it is just youtube compression?
@lucacrespi883 ай бұрын
No, they are real. I see the same when I switch to FSR in game. FSR tends to blur the frame when you have a lot of fast moving pixels. It's very noticeable when you are moving above water. However, I see a different kind of artifact with XeSS, where the frame goes out of focus around the edges while moving the scene. I noticed the best combination on HFW is SMAA+FSR Frame Gen. No idea what DLSS does, I don't have a Nvidia card.
@HopletSplayserovich3 ай бұрын
yes
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
@@HopletSplayserovichno
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
It called shimmering and it's causing by FStRash. Try DLSS with an RTX in your own pc befare say something foolish
@MDiniz-li5vc3 ай бұрын
1:09 look at the water... wtf is that?
@travislindgren71583 ай бұрын
Nice video 📹 DLSS 3.7.10 Is suppior to FSR 3.1 across the board. I just upgraded from DLSS 3.5.10 to DLSS 3.7.10 on my new MSI RTX 4080 Super 16G SUPRIM X on MSI MEG Optix MEG381CQR Plus Gaming monitor. I'm very impressed with DLSS 3.7.10 🎉 Cheers 🥂 🍻
@RudyChiang3 ай бұрын
when come to play, you never realize whos the better, FSR is already good enough and deliver it good to gamer at this point, the important thing is, now you can play next gen game with under $350usd GPU with higher setting and frame rate, it so comfortable, even tho i use nvidia RTX 4070 Super, i will said, AMD is winner here cus they made it and deliver it for all, DLSS better ? just a slight, all have flaws, if i can go back maybe i will buy RX 7800XT or RX 7900 GRE instead RTX 4070 super ;;_;;
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 poor newbe 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@od1sseas6633 ай бұрын
AMD finally made FSR usable. FSR 3.0 and FSR 2.2 where garbage.
@miteina55553 ай бұрын
not really, fsr is like a cheat tool for an apu. Mine, it almost doubles the fps in max setting. outpacing gtx series gpu.
@Tschippy3 ай бұрын
There is still a big difference between FSR and DLSS...
@Definedd3 ай бұрын
FSR 3.0 and FSR 2.2 were actually identical in upscaling, FSR 3.0 just included the frame gen tech
@Shahzad123573 ай бұрын
The comments has nothing to do with dlss@@Tschippy
@smwfreak16473 ай бұрын
@@Tschippy not really yall kinda over exaggerating it.
@Pjohn33 ай бұрын
Dlss est encore en avance sur le fsr surtout sur la reconstruction des éléments en mouvement
@worldhackscentury14462 ай бұрын
Thanks 🙌
@НищаяБлоха3 ай бұрын
Заказуха от АМД + фейковые комментарии. Технология в релизе уже больше года, но только в последние несколько дней нахлынуло сотни таких видео на всех площадках. Греют почву перед выпуском 8000 серии + сдерживают от покупки 5000, так как они выходят раньше. Ну и ещё, в это же время, подняли цены на RX 7900 gre. Совпадение? Не думаю.
@westyk52sparky3 ай бұрын
dont know what is going on with the water. im not getting on my pc. is it youtube or are you seeing it in game ?
@julianorozaa3 ай бұрын
To be honest, 4K with quality preset is the best-case scenario for the technology. I would love to see how 1080p Performance looks like.
@believehumbly549220 күн бұрын
Damn, FSR3.1 is amazing. Even the FSR3 is good enough for me. Several days ago, I installed the FSR3 mod for the Alan Wake 2 and it felt much better. The olden FSR2 really sucks. You will know what I mean if you try the FSR2 in Resident Evil 4 and Alan Wake2. FSR 3 is good and FSR3.1 is much better. I hear Resident Evil 9 is gonna be announced at the event held by Sony in September. If Capcom still works with AMD, hope they can add FSR3.1 into Resident Evil 9. Too bad AMD is not gonna release a GPU that equals 5080 so I will have to upgrade my 6800xt with a 5080(or 5070ti, if 5080 sucks).
@Saeed_6699-e7x3 ай бұрын
AMD❤
@Jutepest3 ай бұрын
NVIDIA 💚
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 get a life kid RTX ON💚
@Jutepest3 ай бұрын
i get it you are jealous because all amd cards sucks at rtx and even at upscaling you guys waited for fg more than year btw and even when it relased it sucks 10 fps in alan wake 2 enjoj 😂😂
@tajintajun87183 ай бұрын
@@OmnianMIU go buy 7900 xtx and enjoy fsr mate we prefer nvidia thats facts better product you can't do anything about it its fact is better in almost every way even in tdp amd has much higher tdp than nvidia way less rt cores and in rast is almost same compare to 4080
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
@@tajintajun8718 ahahahahahahahah no i don't need junk inside my pc, my RTX 4070 is way better future proof than this t@rd crap obsolete peace of garbage trashdeon 7900xtx LMFAO now i'm play CP2077 in path tracing, i started the game 2 weeks ago, i get around 75fps in QHD + DLSSq +FG + RR, with mod of reshade to lower some colors the game is near to reality. This type graphic can't be cathed by any trashdeon on the market. FACT. Get a life, get a brain, a get an RTX 💚😘
@starstreamgamer37043 ай бұрын
Thank you for such an extensive comparison! To be honest, it was expected that the new version of FSR will still be far from perfect. I guess, it is as far as they can get w/o AI training and hardware acceleration. If AMD want to get FSR quality closer to XESS and DLSS they have to follow the same path Nvidia and Intel are going. Their frame generation tech, on the other hand, is very good. And it provides more frames than Nivdia's FG. Very impressive result. Plus, it works with V-Sync w/o any quirks. I think the best way to play games at high refresh rates is combining DLSS SR with AMD's FG and Reflex. So the owners of RTX 2000 and 3000 series do not loose anything feature-wise. If AMD will add FSR 3.1 to many more games, it is a win-win situation for everybody.
@SebbS823 ай бұрын
I can't see any difference in the video. It looks better than the pixel fragments at FSR 2. DLSS was the best upscaling technology. But FSR 3.1 looks like DLSS in the video.
@miteina55553 ай бұрын
can't see the difference too. if you ask most people, they just dont really care about it. just a bunch of losers who need a justification after spending >1k on gpu 😂
@venusprinzj80943 ай бұрын
@@miteina5555 So its bad to Buy a 7900XTX for 1100€?
@yomaso_real3 ай бұрын
@@SebbS82 Only one I can see a visible difference through the video is the Horizon Forbidden West water looking a bit funky on FSR 3.1. You'd be able to see the differences a lot better in person though because KZbin compression is probably making it a lot harder to see every last detail.
@RX7800XTBenchmarks3 ай бұрын
@@SebbS82 there's differences, but I don't understand why people compare it to dlss. They are using totally different methods. The method fsr is using, I think they are doing a good enough job. The usual fuzz around the player looks to be replaced with slight ghosting, which I would take personally. Temporal stability is much better, in some cases some shimmer is noticeable, but much better than what it was like. Hopefully the modders can clean it up a little next month. Apparently we don't need to wait for official implementation anymore, a simple file change is needed.
@SebbS823 ай бұрын
FSR 3.1 looks much better.
@k1cs1m3a83 ай бұрын
They still very far….
@Yadav-Creation3 ай бұрын
You need to watch again🙂
@k1cs1m3a83 ай бұрын
@@Yadav-Creation i don’t have to i tried both on my card…
@TheTwiix3 ай бұрын
need to get those eyes check x) dlss look alot more clear
@lawrencekallal66403 ай бұрын
@@TheTwiix I’d say FSR3.1 looks as clear as DLSS. In fact, FSR3.1 is even clearer than DLSS in some instances. In Spider-Man, look at the bolts of the metal vest at 8:08 (pause it). They are washed out on DLSS and much clearer with FSR 3.1
@Amr_Dabour3 ай бұрын
Ur cpu temp degree is wow. What is ur room temperature?
@FrozburnYT3 ай бұрын
It's random. Usually 22-24c. The reason my temps are low is because I'm using LLC6, lowest possible voltage I've found for 5.8Ghz and also the PC is in a different room (which is massive) with cables through the wall etc. I have it there so that I don't hear anything but as a result of that, my temps are always low. A nice bonus. That's why I don't bother delidding the CPU or watercooling the GPU. It's impossible for that room to heat up. I often have the AC running there as well so that it cools the whole floor instead of the one in my room blasting me. Then there's the MO-RA3 420 with dual D5 pumps running at 100%. Hard for any CPU to heat up when you have absurd flow rates. GPU also doesn't heat up because it benefits from the low ambient temp + running an open case (like a test bench - a modded Core X9). The 4090 Suprim X also happens to be the most overnegineered 4090 with the best aircooler (usually running at 80%, I don't hear it anyway) with Kryonaut paste but switching to PTM 7950 in a few days. The temps will drop drastically under load (450+ watts) and the CPU is up for a repaste as well (Kryonaut to MX-6 because I want to try that paste) Hope this helps.
@di57inct3 ай бұрын
devs will do anything except optimize their games
@-Rizecek-3 ай бұрын
DLSS looks better while moving.
@RaulMazuchelli3 ай бұрын
not worth the 50% extra price tag
@happybuggy15823 ай бұрын
@@RaulMazuchelliit’s worth
@hericlesgustavo62463 ай бұрын
It is known that DLSS has less latency, and was a little better, but if you use lossless it is a little unfair, as the obligation to use windowed mode compromises the game a little, Windows priority, etc
@BIGCAMERA73 ай бұрын
This comparison doesn't mean much I can't watch things like that while playing games
@Bilal.Hussain.Shaikh3 ай бұрын
Amazing, image GTX series running FSR3.1, or AMD 6000 series card running FSR3.1 Ita a big win for people who has older GPU cards
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
Amazing FStRash 😂😂😂 is really funny 😂😂😂 RTX ON 💚
@asdfsdfsadfasdfsf3 ай бұрын
@@OmnianMIU amazing kid fanboy! keep b@rking and Nvidia will give you a 4090 for your contribution! lol
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
@@asdfsdfsadfasdfsf poor kid fanboy scAMD get mad because all trashdeon are obsolete peace of garbage 😢 but saying without crying 😢 RTX ON 💚
@Sourzz6643 ай бұрын
@@OmnianMIUBruh a new version of dlss has to be made for every new series of GPUs Nvidia puts out which is kinda weird since a mega money company can't make a feature that works on every gpu that they've ever made? Can't say it costs them too much money to make it available to all GPUs because AMD literally did it and isn't as big of a company like Nvidia. Instead of Glazing Nvidia try buying an AMD GPU since you have clearly mega bags of money to waste on Nvidia GPUs for every series that comes out
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
@Sourzz664 WTF you talking about? All version of DLSS ate capable on ALL RTX GPUs! Only FG is exclusively for 4000 series. You are ign orant, get some information and I won't to waste my time with junk people like you💩🤡 If AMD make gpus like I will never buy a gpu from AMD. When radeon was under at I had have a x1600 xt.
@nicane-99663 ай бұрын
Hard to tell with yt comprenssion being that hard.
@rafaelmorales90293 ай бұрын
3.1 + FG vs 3.7 + FG OK ?
@eikbolha58833 ай бұрын
Basicly no difference only in horizon rezo dawn if you playing game you wont noticed but when you looking at wather stream you notice small shinering or actefacts in wather at FSR 3.1 but thats only fifference i could spott well lets just say this is the moment we all waiting for now the DlSS is basicly same thing as FSR and even better FSR boosts even better at AMD gpus im currently bought many games with fsr 3.0 and pick some with FSR 3.1 as well and i can tell you damn this is huge now we anly need to see if amd lear how to make RT works in games and boom nvidia is gonna be done with greedy game, and im not hater or anything but for loooong as time i have have nvidia gpus exclusive togeather with intel CPUs but no more cuz now i have system with Ryzen 9 and 7900 gre and i tell you what im never ever gonna look back from this cuz it was cheaper than competition and what is more importantly is its better a lot in turm of FPS per dolar amd wins but now not only wins by this but now win by performance as welll and i tought i never see this day come but well this is perfectjust cant wait for new games with FSR 3.1
@ro6AXE17 күн бұрын
Bro i wish they bring dlss to amd card look how much better it look bro
@rafaelmorales90292 ай бұрын
FSR 3.1 vs XeSS 1.3 please.
@GT4tube3 ай бұрын
6:50 FSR notice are pixels. DLSS clear good
@nitrogenius2 ай бұрын
amd is really good job but there are still some artifacts can be visible to the naked eye : water here: 1:14
@amerikanec-3 ай бұрын
Какой фса3.1 игры стали фризить на 6600 после доайвера 24.6
@andreasnilsson17973 ай бұрын
why use DLSS with 4090... you want native always 60fps is enough for singel player games
@michubern14442 ай бұрын
8k gaming
@andreasnilsson17972 ай бұрын
@@michubern1444 ?
@michubern14442 ай бұрын
@@andreasnilsson1797 8k resolution is demanding even for a 4090
@andreasnilsson17972 ай бұрын
@@michubern1444 yes but who playes AAA games on 8k ? do you know what dlss is ? what it does with the Res ?
@michubern14442 ай бұрын
@@andreasnilsson1797 what else would you play? fast e sport titles? ;) as i said its very demanding and i think dlss does a great job to keep the frames consistant at 60 fps. i know its not native but you see the difference between 4k and 8k even with dlss quality. i think its the best upscaling atm
@lucgrunenwald77953 ай бұрын
maintenant se serait souhaitable d avoir ce FSR 3.1 incorporé a la sortie des jeux et pas 1 an ou plus après la sortie ce qui a un intérêt limité
@xClanPkSx3 ай бұрын
Except for Horizon FW, i couldnt see any difference
@WhiteLakeOf3 ай бұрын
did someone order more soap while using FSR? 😂
@gicaio85643 ай бұрын
The FSR option is only useful if you don't have an RTX video card.
@JOTIXOXO3 ай бұрын
DLSS is better, it is a frame generator instead FSR that is a frame interpolator
@chacharealsmooth9413 ай бұрын
They are the same. Both generate frames based on previous frames.
@DomitriCervantes3 ай бұрын
mmmmm i still think dlss looks better
@AnimeGovno-xm4ri3 ай бұрын
Disagree
@DomitriCervantes3 ай бұрын
@@AnimeGovno-xm4ri that s ok
@nicaciobenevides11453 ай бұрын
AMD: The party is for everyone =)..... NVIDIA: Security, only these 4 can enter the party =/, the others, get out of here.
@PaytonPreslee-xl3bpАй бұрын
I really cant tell the difference fuck nvidia and their over priced gpu then. Ive own both cards but im leaning towards amd now anyday.🤣
@omarxp90762 ай бұрын
lossless win
@BobCat1983 ай бұрын
DLSS всегда опережает FSR
@ahmedsami51863 ай бұрын
Still i can see a bit of ghosting and noisy effect while moving and fighting scene but i am happy its much better vFSR 3.0.
@reviewforthetube64853 ай бұрын
Its still much worse In person especially with motion but it's a big W! The craziest part is they found a way to allow frame generstion whole using 3.1 I think that's awesome for nvidia guys.
@happybuggy15823 ай бұрын
Non of these games are the games i would play but its good to know old hardware can keep up
@Jasontvnd93 ай бұрын
Yeah that old 4090 struggling away......
@happybuggy15823 ай бұрын
@@Jasontvnd9 it is 2 years old already
@Jasontvnd93 ай бұрын
@@happybuggy1582 it is still the current fastest gpu you can buy regardless.
@sTyLzYo3 ай бұрын
for me FSR looks lil bit blurry and flickery
@NEJJJJJ-t4x3 ай бұрын
Fsr 3 wins all day especially with its fg that doubles fps
@L1ghtbirdy3 ай бұрын
the only thing DLSS does better now is water in Horizon and as far as I know it is because DLSS tries to improve the water model
@rng813 ай бұрын
There's other things too. Look at the reflection in Nefarius's helmet in Ratchet & Clank for example.
@FrozburnYT3 ай бұрын
There's a few other things, it's hard to show on KZbin. Rain is worse on FSR as well and some things in motion are off. Hopefully they improve upon those in the future.
@bloodycorrey3 ай бұрын
DLSS looks much better, sharper and faster.
@SaiyanMan24923 ай бұрын
Ratchet and clank and horizon forbidden west are two of the most unoptimized games ever. They don't even fully utilize your GPU power, that's why they get low performance.
@Silent-19833 ай бұрын
This is RTX 4080 not 4090! 🤥
@FrozburnYT3 ай бұрын
I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion. kzbin.info/www/bejne/qmnWmoufpbh6hKM kzbin.info/www/bejne/ooXaYWt6hc9lppY
@MrKriustallon3 ай бұрын
tdp 320w this is 4080...
@MrKriustallon3 ай бұрын
🤥
@yomaso_real3 ай бұрын
For one, the power usage isn't always accurate as a GPU will rarely have to use its full TDP to achieve the best performance, and secondly the card goes over 320W multiple times so unless they increased the power limit that shouldn't really be happening. Plus the performance is in line with the expected 4K max settings of 4090 with DLSS so there's that.
@FrozburnYT3 ай бұрын
It's an undervolted 4090, which is essentially the same FPS as a stock 4090 while using 100 watts less. I don't ever use this for videos, but since it doesn't really matter here (comparing FSR vs DLSS) I just left the undervolt on. kzbin.info/www/bejne/qmnWmoufpbh6hKM kzbin.info/www/bejne/ooXaYWt6hc9lppY
@upfront23753 ай бұрын
@@FrozburnYT It's smart to undervolt the 4090... you will NEVER experience any burning out issues even in long hours of gaming!
@zaselimgamingvideos3 ай бұрын
If you can't tell the difference then you either need your eyes checked or you are watching the video on the mobile/small screen. Fsr3 no doubt is better than before but compare to dlss (right side of the video) the fsr (left side) still looks blurry and funky. But still its better having something than nothing, its specially good for people who have gpus which don't support nvidia dlss/fg. Its getting there, hopefully its gets there sooner.
@FrozburnYT3 ай бұрын
I can confirm it still has that "haze" effect, aka a bit more blurry than DLSS - how noticeable it is depends on the game / environment. Hopefully they get that sorted out in the future. It is indeed nice to have, better than nothing. Many people with older GPUs can use this, it's not bad at all and has improved. Hard to show the true difference between FSR 3.1 and DLSS on KZbin, despite uploading a 4K 150K bitrate footage. KZbin lowers the quality of the video every time. As a side note, I use AMD's frame gen in Tsushima alongside DLSS because, for some reason, AMD's frame gen has 20+ higher FPS while looking essentially the same. Not sure if that's AMD's frame gen being better or NVIDIA's frame gen is poorly implemented in that game.
@Shahzad123573 ай бұрын
@@FrozburnYTyes in fg department (specialy in GOT) fsr fg wins
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
FStRash 3.1 still trash 🤮 RTX ON💚
@happybuggy15823 ай бұрын
4000 series owner be coping
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
@@happybuggy1582 😂😂😂 pathetic fanboy scAMD keep coping with your obsolete trashdeon 😂😂😂
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
@@happybuggy1582 no, you keep coping poor AMDiscount 😂😂😂 all radeon cards lose against all rtx in new games. Get some information before write disinformation
@happybuggy15823 ай бұрын
@@OmnianMIU it doesn’t matter. Upgrading to this series for an upscale is Not even right. And you shifted the topic to RT bc you know that’s the only value and i can tell you only the premium 70 series+ gets to enjoy it above 60fps. RT is such an early bird tech at this moment.
@OmnianMIU3 ай бұрын
@@happybuggy1582 who talking about upgrading?? Do you know that any version of DLSS is capable on any RTX from 2000??
@nicohofmann65053 ай бұрын
How do you keep your pc at such cool temperatures?
@FrozburnYT3 ай бұрын
Overkill cooling. MO-RA3 420 radiator with dual D5 pumps at 100% speed, plus the PC is in a different room (big) so it never heats up. Open case / tech bench and I often have the AC running there as well since I don't like using the one in my room (too direct for me). It's a win win. I have the PC there for noise reasons so that I don't hear anything but I also get low temps because of it. The GPU is not watercooled but it's Surpim X, the best air cooled 4090 and also the most overengineered 4090 (PCB etc). It's also running at 80% fan speed, which I don't hear anyway.