Fusion 360: Using the Patch Workspace to Make a Dodecahedron

Рет қаралды 31,082

Rob Duarte

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 31

@AG3D-b 5 жыл бұрын

Best tutorial ever, No annoying music. To the point, Not to long, not to fast. Just right!

@PeteLorimer 7 жыл бұрын

Just discovered your channel Rob. Love how clear and straightforward your tutorials are.

@sktyby 4 жыл бұрын

You just saved me hours of confusion! Thanks man.

@Spoif 7 жыл бұрын

Hi Rob. I am new to F360 patches (your video introduced them to me). This a great starter! Thank you very much.

@nickekholm 5 жыл бұрын

What a pro you are. Well spoken and paced. Awesome video!

@wdwdHenry9022 4 жыл бұрын

Thank you. I love your voice and the way you explain things.

@amigodesigns 5 жыл бұрын

For those who may want better accuracy: 116.56505º is a more precise solution. Anyway thanks for your video :)

@RobDuarte 5 жыл бұрын

I think a good early lesson for cad/cam is that computers can give you 5 decimal places of precision for an angle, but that is way beyond the physical tolerances of the tools that would make the objects.

@amigodesigns 5 жыл бұрын

@@RobDuarte I know, and I understand your point of view, but as an engineer seeing a gap of 0.6097mm for a dodecahedron with 1000mm sides is too much, I'm used to the automotive industry which often goes as far as 0.001mm tolerances on bigger panels, 0.6... mm is too much. Probably 5 decimals are overkill, but when doing cad I think that at least 3 decimals are almost a must, at least if you want to have accuracy. Nevertheless that was just a note, what is important from your video is the process and the explanation which still much appreciatted, and I mean it.

@RobDuarte 5 жыл бұрын

@@amigodesigns thanks for the reply. I'm interested to know if there's a difference in the final result after stitching, since it closes the gap. I might try it both ways and intersect them (or use the interference analysis) to see if there's a difference between the two solid bodies in the end. Thanks again

@amigodesigns 5 жыл бұрын

@@RobDuarte I have check it and there is a difference, all the edges except the ones attached to the bottom pentagon have different lenghts. Bottom ones in my case: 1453.085mm The ones affected by the slight difference in degrees with a tiny gap between them: 1452.916 mm; 1452.916 mm; 1453.836 mm; 1454.349 mm and 1453.689 mm. The next ones: 1453.794 mm; 1453.021 mm; 1453.021 mm; 1453.907 mm; 1452.276 mm; 1453.942 mm; 1453.021 mm; 1453.021 mm; 1453.794 mm and 1453.111 mm. There are some little differences, for something that doesn't need to be perfect it would look more than okay. Nevertheless, I think one of the problems could be one once you move point to point the half dodecahedron, you are choosing one of the vertexes of the two edges that aren't aligned, so that increase a bit the offset of that part, maybe with stitching before doing that could help a bit. And no problem thank you for taking your time, as I said the methodology is good and I found it helpful, so thanks :).

@ollebjerkas 3 жыл бұрын

@@amigodesigns Thank you for for this!

@MilanPotterSmith 4 жыл бұрын

Cheers... any idea how to make it parametric like this ?

@vallesan 4 жыл бұрын

Awesome 👍 thank you ..I'm going to 3d print planters molds ..

@TheTranq 5 жыл бұрын

Great tutorial. Quick and no bs. Thanks

@jhow3d688 4 жыл бұрын

If you didn’t want the faces to be equal Can you manually pull on the edges of each pentagram to create the shape you want while keeping the edges and points together?