As a Bosnian, tbh i dont really care if they block anything, our politicians already blocked everything! This wont make any changes...😂😂
@martinpuljic1683 жыл бұрын
Istina, usrali su ono sto se nije moglo usrat
@peripheralmaster32653 жыл бұрын
upravu si
@K.Maroon3 жыл бұрын
@nino noni Can you explain yourself?
@dubravkatinodi77763 жыл бұрын
Vaša flota će moći ploviti ispod njega. Znate da smo ga samo radi vas podigli za nekoliko desetaka metara.. 🤗
@dinoiftic56153 жыл бұрын
Tard
@leonpavlic43843 жыл бұрын
I have been crossing those borthers for the last 18 years. The bridge is more than necessary for people that have nothing to do on the Bosnian territory. The way police handles the border crossing in summer is shamefull. It can create 10 km of car lines on both sides. The bridge is absolutely necessary!
@nebularspace3 жыл бұрын
@@Plank-cn1we Da, I’m a half Croat living in the USA and I see this bridge as necessary and justified
@Mynipplesmychoice3 жыл бұрын
As an American you have my American blessing. You should use this as a stepping stone to invade and claim what is rightfully yours. Some people should know when, they are conquered. So conquer my Crustacean friend!
The reasons given against the bridge are very ridiculous, coming from an Indian with no conflict of interests. Which bridge or dam doesn't raise environmental concerns? Plus at half a billion dollar, it's not costly for the impact it'll provide.
@richard_from_england3333 жыл бұрын
@@Mynipplesmychoice Chill, no one is invading anyone here.. This is a non issue
@miken45913 жыл бұрын
The bridge will NOT block Bosnia or its ships in any way. It’s planned height is high enough for ships to travel below.
@bluebox20003 жыл бұрын
Given the long bridge and all the new highway, tunnels and viaducts that must be built, you have to wonder why they just didn't build a 4.5 km tunnel under the Neum Corridor. I'm sure they could have come to an agreement with their neighbor, Bosnia.
@fapmashina13 жыл бұрын
@@bluebox2000 This is abandoned option since several international studies have concluded all other options other than bridge would be considerably more costly, much more complex, less efficient, ... If you haven’t paid attention these studies are mentioned in this video!
@bluebox20003 жыл бұрын
@@fapmashina1 I paid attention. Much longer road tunnels than 4.5 km have been built all over the world. Adding the bridge, dozens of kilometers of new highway along with new actual tunnels and viaducts can't be cheap. This very much would seem to be a strictly political decision.
@badatdota28113 жыл бұрын
@@bluebox2000 Because it would be under BiH territory which is a huge minus, you never know what could happen with BiH, this way you have no possible future issues.
@miken45913 жыл бұрын
@@bluebox2000 - a Boring Company EV only twin tunnels would be very cheap. However they would need BiH permission.
@flamurtarinegjakyt37453 жыл бұрын
I've crossed those borders something like more than 10 times, this bridge would make it much easier.
@rogerhudson97323 жыл бұрын
So it's the EU's fault, before 2013 the Neum corridor was passed with a wave of the hand, now the EU border has to be made strong against migrants.
@MrSarajevoxxx3 жыл бұрын
Maybe you gonna avoid border but you will drive longer
@flamurtarinegjakyt37453 жыл бұрын
@@MrSarajevoxxx You would prefer to take the longer way without customs as well if you ever waited 3 hours to cross the border.
@FenceThis3 жыл бұрын
Y'all seem to be speaking from a strict Croatian point of view
@blindtherapper24703 жыл бұрын
@@FenceThis yes
@therealBosnianBallPlayz3 жыл бұрын
I feel bad about that Croats in the past years needed boats to cross to the mainland Croatia. As a Bosnian, I have nothing against this, we should be allies here
@therealBosnianBallPlayz3 жыл бұрын
Ehhh, bridge is a better solution, and they were naturally Bosnian since Ottomans controlled us, and Austrians controlled Croatia, there was a country called Dalmatia, which was later conquered by Venetians and after that, Austrians. There is no reason to blame us, watch this video here -> kzbin.info/www/bejne/b6vckJZ9jM6Klck
@davorbuklijas17773 жыл бұрын
Dosta je pogledati mapu dvije zemlje..nit Bosna može bez Hrvatske nit Hrvatska bez Bosne. Povijest, ratovi, religije su nas podijelili i učinili da ljudi danas broje krvna zrnca, a da je napravit neki DNA test vjerojatno bi ispali bliski rođaci. Ista je to raja. Nek smo dobri susjedi za dobro Hrvatskoj i Bosni.
@Fredrikschou3 жыл бұрын
@@user-kj9fg6bw7c u really wanna open that can of worms again?
@nemamime49223 жыл бұрын
Dal vas dvojica stvarno pisete na eng a razumite jedan drugog na nasem?
@RePlayBoy1013 жыл бұрын
@Tomas Lesko bosnia is too currupted to join the EU
@fapmashina13 жыл бұрын
This bridge in not gonna “block” Bosnia and Herzegovina! This is absurd statement esp. since bridge design details, particularly bridge height (clearence) is agreed upon between Croatia and BiH after very long negotiations and this 55 meters has been specific request of the Bosnian experts alongside some other details! This hasn’t mentioned in this video but it is very easy to find! Also it has to be known that only the worlds most largest ships wouldn’t be able to pass under this bridge although this kind of ships are very rare visitors of all Adriatic Sea although Croatia and Italy are huge tourist powers and with Slovenia also huge cargo ship routes! This so called “issue” is fabricated by some of the Bosnian politicians as a means of showing muscles against Croatian neighbors for the sake of their domestic political agenda although all details of bridge construction have been agreed and signed between both countries long time ago! Also, during the past BiH used this matter as a leverage for the blackmailing Croatia for various concessions! Now they’re gonna be left without this instrument of political blackmails!
@akrnic733 жыл бұрын
All true.👍
@midzocsgo49983 жыл бұрын
As a bosnian i was at first upset because i thought we had ports, after the video i realized that we dont have a port and we are using croatian port so i am now chill 🇧🇦👍🇭🇷
@antep36673 жыл бұрын
@@midzocsgo4998 stari imaju tamo dolje dvje tri barke, ako si ikada bio u neumu prek ljeta znat ces da je tamo uzasna prometnaguzva, of jedne granice do druge, ovo je super za hrvatsku i bosnu
@midzocsgo49983 жыл бұрын
@@antep3667 nikada nisam bio u neumu
@fapmashina13 жыл бұрын
@@midzocsgo4998 That's very sound and rational thinking! Bosnia and Herzegovina doesn't have real port in Neum at this moment but this bridge is projected high enough not to hinder possible sea traffic for at least very long future since building operable international cargo port in Neum would be massive undertaking hardly possible for any of the Ex-Yugoslavian countries and it is also very questionable would it be beneficial or destructive for the local Neum community that is relying on tourism. And BiH and Croatia have state agreements that are making Ploce seaport at disposition to the BiH cargo! But even in case of building large port in Neum, 55 meters is high enough for many ships and there are much more congested international ports that do operate in circumstances of larger ships passing under somewhat lower bridges or in other unbeneficial circumstances like relatively shallow waters, small cargo surfaces etc... Also, let us hope your beautiful country will join the EU someday and then there will be no hard borders between our two countries. 🇭🇷 👍 🇧🇦
@vincemercieca80573 жыл бұрын
I am 100% in favour of the bridge. I was twice in Croatia where I landed in Dubrovnik and had to travel north to the north part of Croatia. I had to wait quite some time to cross 2 boarders in a matter of a few minutes driving. Croatia is building this bridge on its own territory and building the bridge high enough to let most of the ships pass under it to reach Bosnia Herzegovina
@flatvoicegaming3 жыл бұрын
you should visit Rjeka we have beaches that are pretty nice in summer also Dalmacija would be a great place to visit!
@NA-uz7co3 жыл бұрын
Jesus crist, the bridge its or not high enough? I see many coments at this point with, "yes it is" or "not its not" everybody its getting info from no where, why no one tell form where and how get their info? XD
@matthew_turkmen74823 жыл бұрын
@@NA-uz7co I was at Neum (little town in BIH at that part of the coast), that bridge is ten times higher then highest ship that will ever pass through there.
@NA-uz7co3 жыл бұрын
@@matthew_turkmen7482 its your view, so you aint proving anything, no source or link so i cant see if you have any reason at all
@villamara96323 жыл бұрын
@@NA-uz7co hr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neum
@ranakaadventures77253 жыл бұрын
Croatia have every right to build the bridge and conect teritory .
@slav22843 жыл бұрын
no
@mr.klodovik81443 жыл бұрын
@@slav2284 Lol explain how not?
@slav22843 жыл бұрын
@@mr.klodovik8144 bcs its being built over a shared sea aera
@mr.klodovik81443 жыл бұрын
@@slav2284 First no it's not, Second I think noone really cares about bridge and stuff except maybe several people.
@rokovidovic47053 жыл бұрын
@@slav2284 ne seri pametnjakoviću
@illa79303 жыл бұрын
The bridge won't block anything. It's high enough so that world's highest and biggest ships can pass through(even thought they never will because the coast there is useless).
@fapmashina13 жыл бұрын
Exactly that!
@dejancolic46793 жыл бұрын
Hrvatska glumi silu prema BiH,kao i Bugarska prema Makedoniji.Dal bi Hrvatskoj smetalo da je situacina obratna?
@fapmashina13 жыл бұрын
@@dejancolic4679 Kakvu to molim te silu Hrvatska glumi prema BiH?! Nemoj pisati gluposti! Hrvatska i BiH su pregovarale oko detalja dizajna mosta preko DESET godina čime je značajno usporena realizacija istog a konačnim rješenjem višestruko povećana cijena mosta! Da glumi silu zar bi Hrvatska pregovarala i jednog dana sa prvim susjedima da i ne spominjemo prihvaćanje znatno vece visine mosta od 55 metara ispod mosta?! Ta visina ispod mosta je bila točni zahtjev BiH eksperata i ista je ugrađena u projekt, a sve je i službeno dogovoreno i potpisano između dvije država! Imaju li pojedini genijalci iz vaše zemlje predodžbu koliko je to ogromna visina?! I sve to kako bi se nekada, možda ali samo možda za nekoliko desetljeća u izrazito plitkom i majusnom zaljevu Neuma gradila grandiozna luka! Ispod ovako visokog mosta mogu proći svi brodovi osim onih nekoliko posto na svijetu najvećih grdosija koje bi se sada nasukale u Neumu! A čitavo Jadransko more, talijansko, hrvatsko, crnogorsko... jako rijetko ulaze tako veliki brodovi iako su Italija i Hrvatska velike turističke države a uz Sloveniju i zemlje jakog teretnog prometa! Zadnji put kad je u Jadranu bio malo veći teretni brod tih razmjera isti nije mogao uploviti u Trst zbog plitkoća luke već je morao pristati u Rijeci gdje je bitno dublji gaz! A vi palamudite o ogromnoj luci u Neumu! Ovo je umjetno stvoreno pitanje koje forsiraju bošnjački političari za vaše domaće političke prilike kako bi pokazivali mišiće prema susjedima kad već trideset godina ne nude ništa drugo! Napokon, to su prepoznali i u EU jer nipošto ne bi dali 85% sredstava za gradnju mosta da nije sve ranije dogovoreno i čisto! Taj je projekt prošao zamornu višegodišnju analizu od strane EU stručnjaka ali i međunarodnih eksperata koji su se bavili i pravnim pitanjima! E sad, drugi je par rukavica što dio BiH politike igra prljavo ciljajući na emocije i niske strasti dijela stanovnika BiH, što ignoriraju potpisane ugovore, ono sto su sami tražili i što bi najradije nastavili ucjenjivati još 30 godina kako bi imali s čime pokazivati koliko oni vode brigu o državi!
@vedad49483 жыл бұрын
the coast isn't useless lmao, it gives the nation acess to the Adriatic and its ships can acess sea imports and exports.
@leonardosimunovic56583 жыл бұрын
Ehm, no, a usual panamax class freighter (the common freighters arriving a bit more north in Rijeka) are higher than 55 meters, which is the bridges clearance.
@DanhawkKCC3 жыл бұрын
It's really disappointing that even Futurology, which is overall a great channel, had to put a clickbaiting title. Even the video explains the opposite and directly negates the title. Not only is it annoying, but it's also sad. Also, the video failed to mention a couple of important points: 1. "Croatia blocking Bosnia's entrance to the sea" is a low quality propaganda of Bosniak politicians. They didn't bring up that statement because they want the best for the country. They did it in spite. They even tried to get to the International Court of Justice and the European Commission to block the construction of the bridge, but neither the ICJ nor the European Commission took them seriously, since, as already stated, it was just a low quality propaganda. 2. A potential port at Neum is not even a concept. It's a myth, since it's impossible to build a port there. The sea in the Neum corridor is way too shallow for a port and the constructing an actual port there would take a century of digging, to make the sea deep enough for a port. Not a single country in the wider region has the money, labour nor power to do that. 3. People of Neum would also strongly oppose the construction of that mythical port, since the city of Neum is the only city in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which lays on the Adriatic coast and attracts tourists. Building a port there would destroy the tourism of the city. 4. The bridge complies with every law out there and it's big and high enough for any vessel in the Adriatic Sea, to pass under it. Even the largest container ships which go to the largest container port in the Adriatic Sea, the port of Trieste, can pass under it. So saying that the bridge "isn't high enough" is a false statement. 5. The people of Neum Corridor don't oppose the construction of the bridge. They don't even care, since it won't change anything for them. Those who oppose the construction of the bridge are sitting in their comfy chairs in their offices in Sarajevo and have absolutely nothing to do with Neum.
@markthemurloc70113 жыл бұрын
Well said.
@matpk3 жыл бұрын
@@markthemurloc7011 AWFUL MADE IN CHINA BRIDGE
@akrnic733 жыл бұрын
Great analysis 👍👍👍
@toni92793 жыл бұрын
@@matpk It's not made in China. The bridge is paid entirely by the EU and Croatia and not by China at all like in the case of that deep sea port in Sri Lanca or any other Chinese project in the world.
@madkid53603 жыл бұрын
You forgot to mention that Bosnia uses the Croatian port of Ploče for exporting and importing.
@northernstar48113 жыл бұрын
The bridge has now been connected. It will be operational & open to the public in 2022. No ships have been blocked as the biggest registered Bosnian boat is a 12m yacht.
@zeljkothegreekserb3 жыл бұрын
Can't even go to the toillete without Skillshare appearing.
@djespo693 жыл бұрын
Stop saying toilet! You may as well say shit chair. Its a rest room!!!
@rk64833 жыл бұрын
@@djespo69 wueee
@Adi-megatron3 жыл бұрын
I'm bosnian, and bridge is not blocking anything. This stupid idea comes from our stupid politicians. Awesome bridge Croatia! 👍
@NeoclassicYT3 жыл бұрын
Yo! Thanks bro! It's nice to hear truthful voices!
@Adi-megatron3 жыл бұрын
@@NeoclassicYT thrutfull and realistic,
@DataLog2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I'm Croata and the only problem were annoying border crossings. Nobody wants to block Bosnia...
@asimasim86912 жыл бұрын
IZROD !
@sixstring47182 жыл бұрын
Love u both 🇦🇱🇽🇰❤️🇭🇷🇧🇦
@michaelnicholson27642 жыл бұрын
My family and I just drove across the new bridge two days ago while vacationing in the region. It saves a lot of time and will be a boon to the tourist economies of the whole Dalmatian Coast!
@marinodezelak11803 жыл бұрын
As a Slovenian I support the Bridge, it's a very good idea for Croatia. and I think the "Blocking Bosnia from open seas" thing is a non-factor, Croatia already has all control over that by simply not allowing a corridor to the open seas. It's the same thing in Slovenia, don't need any bridge between Italy and Croatia, Our access to the open seas is blocked simply by the territorial waters of Italy and Croatia meeting in front of our coast, and neither allowing a corridor between them for unrestricted access for Slovenia... Same thing for Bosnia, except there it's not Italy and Croatia cockblocking, it's just Croatia on 2 sides.
@jazz1tup3 жыл бұрын
The Croatian bridge's "Clearance below" is 55m. The dimension you should look up for each vessel is "Air Draft" which specifies max. height of a ship above the sea. Even though there are some ships with the air draft of 55-65m, I don't think they will be targeting Neum anytime soon.
@chrisliang69023 жыл бұрын
HMM Algeciras HMM Copenhagen HMM Dublin HMM Gdansk HMM Hamburg HMM Helsinki HMM Le Havre HMM Oslo HMM Rotterdam HMM St Petersburg MSC Gülsün MSC Samar MSC Leni MSC Mia MSC Febe MSC Ambra MSC Mina MSC Isabella MSC Nela MSC Sixin MSC MSC Apolline CMA CGM Jacques Saadé CMA CGM Champs Elysées CMA CGM Palais Roya CMA CGM Trocadero (list of ships above 60m in height) The mast height you have for Algeciras is from the deck, not from the sea, in fact, it's 61m above the sea. There are more than 150 ships taller than 55m, not that most would ever be traveling to the Adriatic sea.
@jazz1tup3 жыл бұрын
@@chrisliang6902 I am not a sailor nor a ship builder, so I tried to decipher those technical terms all by my self. Thanks for the correction!
@ag2smal3 жыл бұрын
@@chrisliang6902 - Although you are right, Neum as a port would be so meaningful that there is no way that those ships would have it on their route, as you mentioned as well.
@FN2166_3 жыл бұрын
The big cruise ships and aircraft carriers will not be able to pass. Some of them were visiting Neum before.
@zlatkozivkovic86943 жыл бұрын
@@FN2166_ Ever been to Neum? The ships with air draft bigger than 55 meters don't have enough draft clearance to go to Neum. And, Neum is not the port feasible to make a container ship port any way.
@honzahalik57503 жыл бұрын
I think they are completely justified to build it. As said in this video its fully in their territory and does not sop any curent traffic.
@amrdaous3 жыл бұрын
Current traffic...yes But if Bosnia wants to build a port and receive their goods directly, the ships are not going to be able to!
@bossboss79413 жыл бұрын
No it is not, there are not defined maritime border with Bosnia and Croatia. Croatians says that they are building on its own teritory, but Bosnian version says that they has access to open sea, including that small coridor under the bridge (UN law). Bosnians are probabbly right, but there are some Croat politicans in Bosnia who represents interests of neighboring country and has veto on desitions to prevent building bridge.
@Antoniobr9113 жыл бұрын
@@bossboss7941 Actually croatian member of Presidency of BiH agreed with bosnian version, it was serbian member Milorad Dodik that agreed with Croatians and blocked bosnian attempts to block construction.
@antel7043 жыл бұрын
@@Antoniobr911 He is not real Croat member he is hiding Bosniak member main problem what dominate bosniak politics constantly pushing thrue the small door and risk unit of BiH.
@winningelevenbosnia3 жыл бұрын
@@antel704 What is a 'real croat' ?
@OO-zg9cd3 жыл бұрын
Bosnia will not be blocked, the bridge is wide and large enough for passage.
@jzk39193 жыл бұрын
Homework is not done - I see.
@untzuntz30003 жыл бұрын
Yeah, nope
@bfFAN2213 жыл бұрын
@@jzk3919 True - because they left out the bit that says Neum waters are too shallow for cargo ships; which even without the bridge, doesn't contribute to anything in Bosnia's favour. Sorry dude, but anyone against this piss-poor "landlock" farce has much more to prove with less said than any of you reacting to us :)
@bfFAN2213 жыл бұрын
@@untzuntz3000 Uhhh, no, yeah actually...
@user-td3tq7vx3i3 жыл бұрын
For example, is it wide enough for battleships or large ships? I know Bosnian government doesn't have a navy but who knows the future? So, I don't really care, i am not even Bosnian or Croatian but it'll block Bosnia one way or another.
@stephchipres31032 жыл бұрын
Should I say this is a good development or what 🤷🤷 It might make things pretty easier
@williamsanita69502 жыл бұрын
people feel leaving their country is the best way to get a secured job or business opportunities, but no because they still have many jobless people in that country they are running to
@williamsanita69502 жыл бұрын
People's mentality have to change about coming to hyped named countries because life might be much more difficult, who knows
@alexissantos64902 жыл бұрын
@@williamsanita6950 For me I lost my job 9 months ago, I'm surviving today with my own personal forex investment
@alexissantos64902 жыл бұрын
I believe any where I am God helping us there must be a means of survival
@alexissantos64902 жыл бұрын
I make good income weekly from bitcoin mining and its been my reliable source for income
@123456789012Chris3 жыл бұрын
It is not true that the Peljesac Bridge will cut off Bosnia from the sea! Even the largest sailing ship in the world, the Royal Clipper, would be able to pass under this bridge without any problems, but she will probably never pass, because the port of Neum is simply too small for such large ships!
@amersabitovic2033 жыл бұрын
It is enough for most tankers.
@ambientad.o.o.62793 жыл бұрын
@@amersabitovic203 Ma koji tankeri u Neumu
@amersabitovic2033 жыл бұрын
@@ambientad.o.o.6279 Plavi, crveni, oni metalik farbe su meni najbolji ...
@ambientad.o.o.62793 жыл бұрын
@@amersabitovic203 Pa Neum je preplitak i premalen za većinu tankera, a i zar nemate Ploče, tamo uredite svojim novcima za primanje tankera i riješeno, ionako Neum nema nikakvu infrastrukturu za tankere.
@jovicalapad3 жыл бұрын
@@ambientad.o.o.6279 A vi vratite Srbske kuće i stanove po hrvatskoj !!
@ivozagreb34323 жыл бұрын
This is an incredibly incorrect and just plain wrong video. Croatia did everything not to block the bay of Neum for large ships and in my humble opinion Croatia did too much because Neum cannot be turned into a harbor - the sea is too shallow there. Then for just being correct, the opposition to the bridge came only from the Bosnian Muslims. Bosnia and Herzegovina is not a state of Bosnian Muslims. It is a state of Serbs, Croats and Bosnian Muslims and only the Bosnian Muslims opposed the bridge. When Turkey built the bridges over Bosporus, they didn't ask anyone for permission, and that is one of the most important sea passages.
@Batman-wv5ng3 жыл бұрын
This was always Croatian land , before the war criminal Tito gave excess to Bosnia’s .
@samurai_11793 жыл бұрын
@@Batman-wv5ng I'm not sure if that's correct. As far as I know, Dubrovnik republic gave Neum to Bosnia (around 1700s) to prevent having a border with Venetia. Since then, Neum is a part of BiH, but it wasn't Tito who gave Neum to Bosnia, it was Dubrovnik.
@Silenceeify3 жыл бұрын
@@samurai_1179 true
@rexgamer82013 жыл бұрын
@@samurai_1179 to turkey not bosnia
@samurai_11793 жыл бұрын
@@rexgamer8201 yeah, you're right, my mistake
@goranbabic26613 жыл бұрын
Of course, the reason why Muslim politicians ( not Bosnian-Herzegovinian, because Serb and Croat politicians in BiH have nothing against) oppose the construction of the bridge is not because it would hinder the access of ships to the future port. The real reasons why BiH Muslim politicians are against building the bridge are as follows: 1. By building a bypass bridge, they will no longer be able to blackmail Croatia (blackmail by occasional closures and traffic restrictions through Neum - what they did in the past) 2. By creating tensions, they want to influence their people and additionally politically radicalize and homogenize them against Croatia and Croats. The construction of the port is absurd because of many reasons: 1. Natural conditions do not allow the use of the port in a way that would be economically justified 2. Building a port would create an environmental disaster 3. The construction of the port requires huge funds (Railway, highway, large warehouses and terminals, etc., and BiH does not have that money, nor does anyone else want to invest billions of dollars in economically unjustified investment 4. The local BiH population is against the construction of the port and support the construction of the bridge, because the bridge means great benefit to them, and the port means the destruction of their economy - especially tourism. 5. BiH has given its consent to the construction of a bridge (with the only condition regarding the height, and which is accepted and the bridge of such height is being built) Etc., etc ... It should be noted that Croatia also offered BiH other solutions, such as the construction of a corridor across the Neum, but this was vigorously rejected by Muslim politicians in BiH without any real reason.
@RainerSinkwitz Жыл бұрын
Consider that Germany had a similar issue with Poland before WW2 -- and it probably was a significant cause of WW2 then (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_Corridor).
@goranbabic26613 жыл бұрын
There is no problems with the bridge. Ask the local people in Neum - all of them support the project.
@himzooglecevac93563 жыл бұрын
Did you drive trough old road on the way to Zagreb after we built highway? All restaurants are closed and villages are dead, because much less people are driving on old road. Neum will be isolated after bridge is done. So for all that people that support bridge, they should be careful what they wish for. Much cheaper options were on table to solve the problem and to connect us with rest of Croatia. And in few years if B&H join EU, bridge will be useless.
@mark8u_9653 жыл бұрын
@@himzooglecevac9356 Bosnia its never gona join EU.
@himzooglecevac93563 жыл бұрын
@@mark8u_965 never say never 👍
@melluzi3 жыл бұрын
@@himzooglecevac9356 Even joining the EU does not necessarily mean joining Schengen. And that is actually the problem.
@himzooglecevac93563 жыл бұрын
@@melluzi yep, I agree, but time will show
@RoScFan3 жыл бұрын
It wont block jack shit. Ive seen the declarations of the ministers of both those countries and the photos of the bridge in construction. Croatia says all current ships going to bosnia will fit. Bosnia says they cant develop in the future.... insane argument from one of europes worst economies. Croatia is supposed to wait for bosnia to develop when they havent developed in 30 y? Bosnia is fine and just being a drama queen.
@jureromic85983 жыл бұрын
Big fact!
@sesvecan3 жыл бұрын
The clearance figure of 55 meters is what was demanded by Bosnian experts. I understand the point but should we discuss the bosporus bridge, too which is only a few meters higher in clearance?
@bayridge35693 жыл бұрын
@@sesvecan 55 meters clearance even the biggest canoes on earth can navigate under that bridge. I mean the biggest bosnian port can accommodate the most giant canoe in the world.
@LucianoMMatias2 жыл бұрын
This week I crossed this bridge. Congratulations from Portugal.
@celolov8783 жыл бұрын
Bosnia will not be blocked, the bridge is large for passage.
@shukilipert10763 жыл бұрын
Respekt za braca hrvati pordrav iz albanije
@markvolf35313 жыл бұрын
Pozdrav iz Hrvatske
@ivankraljevic12 жыл бұрын
Guess who lives in that part of B&H on sea? CROATS!
@kristijanEX3 жыл бұрын
Neum is 97-98% Croat inhabited and the local population supports the construction of the bridge so Bosnia and Herzegovina can't complain.
@oneandonly71913 жыл бұрын
Had suti molim te
@burek96573 жыл бұрын
Who cares what people in Neum think. Its a small town and is not asked what to do at all.
@daz71223 жыл бұрын
@@burek9657 Still going up no matter what Sarajevo thinks.
@osmohusejinovic86963 жыл бұрын
Sve sto ide up moze lako i da se srusi.
@gibusgaming3 жыл бұрын
There are still Serb majority areas in Croatia does Croatian law not apply in these areas?
@Groaznic3 жыл бұрын
The fair thing for Croatia to do is to say, yo Bosnia, we do it like this, we're building the bridge, and here is an empty table, the more money you slap on this table the higher we are able to increase the main bridge span height, it's all up to you bro.
@emizerri3 жыл бұрын
They should respond by blocking its construction
@prostosergik3 жыл бұрын
@@emizerri they did, but who listen to poor Bosnia?
@emizerri3 жыл бұрын
@@prostosergik =( Inshallah, God listens
@dimitriymirovsky3 жыл бұрын
Or maybe Bosnia can send some terrorist to explode the bridge? Just saying. Much cheaper solution then.
@emizerri3 жыл бұрын
@@dimitriymirovsky terrorism = sanctions, which = more expensive in the long run
@bibironibuh31043 жыл бұрын
BTW 98% of population in Neum are Croats and because of this fact their opinion counts as important part of the decision ,plus they will get rid of the traffic jams that run through the city.
@flogsgaming14263 жыл бұрын
*bosnian croats
@sanjakrmek71803 жыл бұрын
How will they get rid of traffic jams in summer? Magic? You know traffic jams happen on borders and the population that lives there cannot simply get rid of it if the border police need to check passports. People in Neum can't impact the speed or slowness of traffic jams other than throwing stuff on the road therefore slowing it down even more. Your point didn't make any sense.
@bibironibuh31043 жыл бұрын
@@sanjakrmek7180 that's why the bridge is for .Different thing if someone goes in or out of BiH, then you have to go trough border checkpoint, simple logic , isn't it!?
@petarjuric58282 жыл бұрын
@@flogsgaming1426 Bosnian Croats are Croats and so are Bosnians if you know history.
@flogsgaming14262 жыл бұрын
@@petarjuric5828 ne seri brate
@renatobegic99833 жыл бұрын
It wont block Bosnia wtf , they have small port in Neum their ships can pass under bridge and 99% of population in Neum are Croats.
@bigbadwulf57853 жыл бұрын
Most Bosnians dont care about this, i feel like this getting blown out of porportion.
@Bosnian.hunter3 жыл бұрын
uredu i sve ali samo da znate da vas boli kurac za ostale nek bosna i srbija umiru vi necete noge podignut i nesto uradit da pomognete ali ok naljutili ste cjelu drzavu bih
@ivanmikulic86713 жыл бұрын
@@Bosnian.hunter Koju cijelu bih?naljutili smo 23% bih,odnosno bošnjačke unitariste,za koje nas boli briga,zovi sejdu komšića pa dignite tužbu😂😂.
@joskocibilic90043 жыл бұрын
@@Bosnian.hunter Što bi to mi trebali napraviti da vam bude bolje? Boli neke ovaj most opasno.🤔
@yusyus23863 жыл бұрын
@@Bosnian.hunter koju drzavu bosna nije drzava vec drzavna zajednica i znas koliko nas boli k sto ste se vi naljutili
@SuzanneU3 жыл бұрын
Having sat for several hours in a bus between the two border check points when a person had a passport issue, I really like the bridge. The bridge won't stop me from visiting Bosnia i Herzogovina on my next trip to Croatia. I loved Mostar, and want to see more of BiH.
@Gold265023 жыл бұрын
yea but it does block bosnia's access to the sea, i think a deal with bosnia would be not only WAY cheaper but definitley way more eco friendly and both would come out of the deal satisfied, he mentioned an idea of a "blocked" tunnel and i think that would've been great.
@saff33563 жыл бұрын
@@Gold26502 it doesn't block anything. bridge is 55m high, and the distance between two middle pylons is 200m
@Gold265023 жыл бұрын
@@saff3356 But in the video itself is saying that it does block it, and bosnia isnt raising its voice for no reason, there must be some truth to that.
@darthvader27503 жыл бұрын
@@Gold26502 Bridge is tall enough for ships to go under it. Bosnia is just using this situation to get some political attention.
@dariogrzinic1443 жыл бұрын
@@Gold26502 Are you dumb? How is a 55 meter tall bridge blocking anything?
@Malac1998aaaaAaaaaa2 жыл бұрын
Our Territory our Rules, and btw Neum is 99% Croatian City even its in "Bosnian" Territory. Bosnia will never have Docks for Ships so its blocking nothing.
@miliba3 жыл бұрын
When driving from Split to Dubrovnik those two border checks wasted a lot of time. So i welcome this project
@ivankaracic73573 жыл бұрын
Bosnia and Herzegovina does not have a port ,they use Croatian port Ploče and have special agreement with it.Small town Neum have acces to shallow waters only.
@Paco13373 жыл бұрын
Just look up who built port in Ploče
@fiditenemini24522 жыл бұрын
@@Paco1337 just look up who built up whole of "bosnia"
@IntroMan963 жыл бұрын
As a Croatian I am happy.
@jukashvili17673 жыл бұрын
Bridge has just been finished and Croatia is connected after 300 years
@LukaMagda13 жыл бұрын
After 75 years.
@LukaMagda13 жыл бұрын
@J J It was given to the Ottoman Empire by the Republic of Dubrovnik to avoid attempts of conquest. That doesn't mean Croatia had been whole at the time. But that part of Croatia was whole and connected 76 years ago, before second yugoslav occupation.
@antoniorsoftware3 жыл бұрын
@@LukaMagda1 You say Croatia was whole 75 years ago, but Istria and Dalmatia was handed over by your fascist friends to Italy. And when Istria was finally returned by partisans led by an actual Croatian born leader you call that occupation ? Obvious fascist right there.
@LukaMagda13 жыл бұрын
@@antoniorsoftware You weren't reading with attention. I said that specific part of Croatia was whole and connected and it was. Istria, Rijeka, Zadar and some of the islands had been handed over to Italy by your yugoslav friends under the Serbian monarch. Your Communist friends were German allies and would had remained German allies if crazy Hitler hadn't attacked your leader Stalin. As for your friend Tito, well there were two. The one before WW2 had nine fingers, the new one had ten and had also been seen playing piano and violin. Skills not easily acquired by poor country boys raised in a north croatian village in those days. Of the two it's hard to tell which was the worse criminal. And yes, I sure call both yugoslav occupations what they were because Croatian people have never wanted them, nor voted for them, nor agreed to them, and not one yugoslav communist government had been elected by the people.
@user-kj9fg6bw7c3 жыл бұрын
@@antoniorsoftware what means "actual Croatian born leader" Who was real Croatian and who wasnt?
@kikiculina27453 жыл бұрын
I am from Bosnia, it does not block us, it can only help us
@crogmmp3 жыл бұрын
Yeahh! Even you guys agree!
@pticaromi9003 жыл бұрын
I am Bosnian and I am very happy for Croatian bridge. All normal people are happy. All is very very beautiful
@serdar91792 жыл бұрын
@Super Duber Da i nakraju uzeti njene teritorije 😎
@serdar91792 жыл бұрын
@Super Duber To je i poenta
@JackupTraining2 жыл бұрын
It's not blocking anything. Ships can pass under the bridge - like in any other place in the world.
@yamahatdm20533 жыл бұрын
ubili ste google translate... 😂😂😂
@V8AmericanMuscleCar3 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣
@CommonCommiestudios3 жыл бұрын
I now remembered the meme that goes "Bosnia: Can I have a sip? Croatia: Yes but only a little sip"
@CommonCommiestudios3 жыл бұрын
@Selma Adela [visible confusion]
@flatvoicegaming3 жыл бұрын
@Selma Adela tell us rn
@ivan-Croatian2 жыл бұрын
I'm from Croatia and I'm very curious, How did you came to conclusion that this bridge will block Bosnia in any way?
@movingforward-walk-and-relax2 жыл бұрын
I just wanted to ask the same question. I think it's just a bit controversial title to get more views.
@florijancindric2 жыл бұрын
Because they are budale teske eto tako su ustanovili da ce taj most blokirati bilo sta.
@danutbe654111 ай бұрын
It will block Bosnia from having a port for trading
@paulallen810917 күн бұрын
@@danutbe6541 Does Switzerland need a port for trading?? They don't and still are the wealthiest country in Europe. Switzerland is not in the EU, neither is Norway and yet those two have the highest average GDP/capita in all of Europe. Does Austria, Hungary and the Czech Republic have a port? No, they're landlocked. Hasn't stopped them in any way. Cuba meanwhile can have all the ports in the world and it won't make a difference for they under an economic blockade and severe sanctions by the USA. Besides, what Bosnia sells (exports) abroad goes to Croatia 14%, Germany 14%, Serbia 13%, Italy 10%, Austria 9%. Bosnia's imports are from these countries: Croatia 16%, Serbia 13%, Germany 8%, Italy 8%, China 7% (2022) What does this mean? If Bosnia sells most of its products to Croatia, Germany, Serbia, Italy and Austria *then all those countries can be reached by land* . Croatia and Serbia are neighbors and Austria and Germany are a day away by car/truck. Italy is the only country which would be faster to trade with by sea. How much more can Italy buy from Bosnia? Suppose Italy wants to buy more minerals/metals. Then that would mean Germany (and the others) will get less and prices will go up. If so Germany can offer *more money* to keep their percentage. This will only benefit trade. The most common destination for the exports of Bosnia and Herzegovina are Croatia ($1.47B), Germany ($1.46B), Serbia ($1.35B), Italy ($1.07B), and Austria ($942M). What country would Bosnia need to sell its products too for a port to be necessary? Egypt? Libya? Malaysia? As for imports to Bosnia *same story* . Only China is a far-away country which requires shipping. If the Chinese themselves knew they could benefit greatly from this trade they'd finance most of the port. When the biggest export and import partners for Bosnia are close to them and reachable by simple road transport why is a port for sea trade so important?
@noodengr3three8253 жыл бұрын
In 2013 I went thru those very border crossings. Overall that went smoothly but I thought at the time " there has to be a better way". Looks like they found it. Lovely corner of Europe to visit by the way
@geoffreytudor56742 жыл бұрын
While I fervently hope the future of the region is continuing stability and prosperity, the Croats are, I think, wise to avoid political border crossings in unifying the two parts of their country.
@tottalynotmark8772 жыл бұрын
Due to its rather unusual shape, it always had problem with connectivity, and therefore was separated into many autonomous regions which resulted in economic inequality, with Central Croatia being as rich as Slovenia while Slavonia was as poor as Serbia. Dubrovnik (and rest if pelješac Peninsula) used to be a rather rich snd prosperous kingdom due to its separation issues with rest of Croatia. Connecting Croatia is a wise move indeed.
@zlatko82883 жыл бұрын
I cross those borders at least once a week when I travel to Dubrovnik with van. Since vans and trucks have to go to separate part of border for customs, wait times are usually between 30 minutes to 1.5 hours. Me and my colleagues can't wait for that bridge.
@ivangregoric26773 жыл бұрын
My colleague and I can't wait.... In English, your name comes second. In Croatian your name comes first.
@zlatko82883 жыл бұрын
@@ivangregoric2677 de ne seri
@Lorens4553 жыл бұрын
Great looking bridge that should have been build long ago! It is not a question of whether Croatia has the right to build this bridge because of course they do. Croatia has the right to build on their territory and connect their sovergn state, and in so doing will connect all of Europe. All European leaders want this too. Like it was pointed out by others, the only opposition was in Sarajevo By incompetent politicians sitting behind comfy desks who are trying to justify their jobs.I think that most Bosnian citizens will agree that the politicians in Sarajevo should be doing a lot more for its citizens then complain about a bridge that I will have zero impact on BiH.
@asterixx68782 жыл бұрын
I have heard that several Bosnian supercruisers and even some aircraft carriers have been blocked. Can somebody confirm this?
@Emanuel-tq3ro3 жыл бұрын
As a Croat I passed few times thru Bosnia and it was very slow because of a big traffic jams, so i think the bridge will be usefull
@ProblemForSolution3 жыл бұрын
@Solve Everything That will and should never happen again. Independence is the way to go, different religions, ethnicities will spark old issues again with ease. I don't want to be associated with serbia or bosnia in any way.
@LukaMagda13 жыл бұрын
@Solve Everything Better to restore Austrian Empire. Make Central Europe great again! We had been one country for half a millenia after all. With Drina river as a natural and historic boundary between the West and the East.
Fact, in those 4.5km Neum area, 97% inhabitants are croatians just like we have a majority in western herzegowina with over 95% croatians living. The borders are today as they were inside socialist republic yugoslawia and yes, they make no sense. If the borders were made as about ethnicity there would be no need for this bridge. Communists took parts of Croatia away.
@TheValyGaming3 жыл бұрын
You might be barely technically correct that those borders are from YU but that's like eating from the toilet and wondering why your meal tastes like piss. The BiH-Cro border has been more or less stable since the annexation of Dubrovnik in the early 19th century. The communists had nothing to do with it. In fact, the fact that you think that it was the commies fault for how the border looks only goes to show how little you actually know. And why would you make borders based on ethnicity? since when does that work? An ethnostate only exists in a bottom of a nationalists crack pipe as a dream, things don't work that way in the real world
@ivangregoric26773 жыл бұрын
@@TheValyGaming who are you to say how things should work? You don't know that much.
@northernstar48112 жыл бұрын
@@TheValyGaming "The communists had nothing to do with it. In fact, the fact that you think that it was the commies fault for how the border looks only goes to show how little you actually know. " The sea side town of Neum used to be part of the "Banovina of Croatia" before WW2 in Royal Yugoslavia. So the Yugoslav communist party was responsible for cutting Croatia into two parts after WW2.
@clansman893 жыл бұрын
6:32 half of that photoshopped port would be in Croatian territorial sea, making it impossible to ever be built.
@sadiqahmed41433 жыл бұрын
Lol I guess Bosnia has a coastline for show
@nemamime5212 жыл бұрын
Granica je malo ispred „luke“
@clansman892 жыл бұрын
@@nemamime521 Nije istina. Odmah ispred Kleka su dva mala otočića (Mali i Veli škoj) koji pripadaju Hrvatskoj. Veloga čak možeš vidjeti prema jugoistoku, a Mali se ne vidi jer je ispod fotošopirane luke.
@mr.gabe53 жыл бұрын
Hello am from croatia (Hrvatska) 🇭🇷🇭🇷🇭🇷🇭🇷🇭🇷
@makimane33673 жыл бұрын
Ma zaboli me
@cropunisher58793 жыл бұрын
@@makimane3367 Ugrizi i moga da i mene boli
@crogmmp3 жыл бұрын
@@cropunisher5879 Uuu hahaha
@ggeronimo44123 жыл бұрын
@@makimane3367 sta si se naljutio
@pja87733 жыл бұрын
I have travelled from Dubrovnik to Split and from Korčula to Split and back again more times than I can count. This bridge is long overdue as being stuck at the Neum border crossing in the middle of summer is not fun.
@nicoislazy3 жыл бұрын
This mans voice makes me calm and also very interested in the subject
@snokehusk2233 жыл бұрын
Just so you know teritory of BiH was once Croatians but BiH never had the cost so thats why we have almost the whole cost. Great video btw.
@snokehusk2233 жыл бұрын
@Travunija Zetic 91' 😋
@pronoob64403 жыл бұрын
@Travunija Zetic u sedmon stoljecu je prva drzava hehe
@petardrmac1323 жыл бұрын
Kaze se coast ne cost i Croatian ne Croatians, ali dobro si im rekao.
@dejancolic46793 жыл бұрын
Ivane nepismen si
@snokehusk2233 жыл бұрын
@@petardrmac132 je je na brzinu san napisa
@petarjuric58282 жыл бұрын
I have passed from Croatia thru Bosnia back to Croatia so many times it sould really make it much easier so iam all for it go Croatia 🇭🇷❤
@silveriver92 жыл бұрын
🇭🇷 🤝 🇨🇳
@aaronmarciano10473 жыл бұрын
I think we all love the part in the video where he’s like “however the project does have some issues”
@zwykyziomek25703 жыл бұрын
and the issues are always the same xD
@fapmashina13 жыл бұрын
Although in fact there’s no real issues but some Bosnia and Herzegovina’s politicians political agenda against their neighbors for the sake of their domestic politics! All details of the Peljesac bridge have been negotiated and agreed upon between two countries! Bridge height below bridge (clearence) of 55 meters has been specific request of the Bosnian experts that has been met upon in bridge design alongside some other details, number and width of passages and so forth!
@TRUBOLAZ3 жыл бұрын
B&H took Neum territory without asking, pretending to be a successor of Otoman Empire!
@matthew_turkmen74823 жыл бұрын
@@TRUBOLAZ de ne seri
@silveriver92 жыл бұрын
🇭🇷 🤝 🇨🇳
@SugarBlood152 жыл бұрын
You know whats funny. The Chinese finished the bridge before European companies made access roads lol. Same thing happened in Montenegro with their highway passing over mountains. And Germans and French and so on complain that more and more European countries employ Chinese for their infrastructure projects.
@MrPerooo13 жыл бұрын
Unnecessary untrue clickbait title which was even explained why in the video. Also a lot of facts are straight up not true, such as the bridge not being high enough and blocking cargo ships. To be clear, this is not a bad video, it just needed more clearance and research.
@natalijasabic89403 жыл бұрын
Jedva čekam most,da se zaletim s ponosom i veseljem u srcu💓
@silveriver92 жыл бұрын
🇭🇷 🤝 🇨🇳
@SL-xg1dy3 жыл бұрын
Fun fact Pelješac Bridge is now completed
@raughboy1883 жыл бұрын
Ok i am croatian i'll make it simple: That bridge won't block bosnia at all so this video is pointless.
@mediterranean48233 жыл бұрын
It is not the Mediterranean Sea, it is the Adriatic Sea.
@flamurtarinegjakyt37453 жыл бұрын
The Adriatic Sea is part of the Mediterranean Sea
@mediterranean48233 жыл бұрын
@@flamurtarinegjakyt3745 No it is not ! Wrong definition. The Medierranean Sea is Mediterranean Sea and the Adriatic Sea is Adriatic Sea! Can you say that the Medierranean Sea is the part of the Atlantic Ocean? Of course that it is a wrong definition.
@flamurtarinegjakyt37453 жыл бұрын
@@mediterranean4823 The Adriatic is the northernmost arm of the *Mediterranean Sea*, extending from the Strait of Otranto (where it connects to the Ionian Sea) to the northwest and the Po Valley. This is from Wikipedia.
@mediterranean48233 жыл бұрын
@@flamurtarinegjakyt3745 I was born in the house which is on the shore of the Adriatic Sea. When I get out from my app now, I need only 10 min walking to be on the beach at the Adriatic Sea and I know very well where I'm and how the Adriatic Sea is located.
@flamurtarinegjakyt37453 жыл бұрын
@@mediterranean4823 I live next to the Adriatic Sea as well (in the northernmost part of it), and my dad was born im the southernmost part of it. I know it very well, anyway you don't need to live here to know it is part of the Mediterranean Sea, it is just geography.
@ivangaric22753 жыл бұрын
An ignorant country is called Bosnia and Herzegovina !? And BiH is a country of CROATS, SERBS AND MUSLIMS . Croats have lived in the disputed part for thousands of years and that part is called HERZEGOVINA . Serbs support the Croatian project and Muslims would like there to be another Ottoman Empire :)
@user-zj3bj5fl9t3 жыл бұрын
You are the one who is ignorant, Germany ,Swiss and Austria is country of Germans and other people but living in their respective states with out desire to be Empires and respecting there states borders, and international water and maritime laws. Bosnia and Herzegovina is in existence for century's and has right to there coast too, with rights to shipment tourism ant etc. When they will develop there cost is there problem, but in meantime it is illegal (according to maritime laws) for Croatia to squash there accesses to open sea with biggest transportation's boats, which this bridge does exactly that.
@TheJanez593 жыл бұрын
Nobody will block anyone ! Why you talking if you dont know the real situation ! Boats, smaller or bigger will easily passed under the bridge.
@petarblazevic19543 жыл бұрын
I spend my summer in Dubrovnik and sometimes you have to wait for hours on the border so the bridge is a good thing
@jansobieski62403 жыл бұрын
Bosnia is 150 kilometers away from this bridge,Neum is in Herzegovina and is populated by Croats and we love the Pelješac bridge.
@tomixtomix85323 жыл бұрын
And Hercegovina is old Serbia
@jansobieski62403 жыл бұрын
@@tomixtomix8532 Vojvodina and Zemun are Croatia.
@tomixtomix85323 жыл бұрын
@@jansobieski6240 Croatia never exist in this region before nazi occupation made by Hitler, and today we have Croatia because of NATO occupation of this region.. Old terrorist minions ... kzbin.info/www/bejne/mpOzY3ive52XaZY They made holokaust for Hitler and today they made etnic cleansing for NATO occupation of this region kzbin.info/www/bejne/fqS0XpiJq8qBbKM Everybody knows what happened with Hitler, and a same thing will be with NATO occupation forces and with NATO terrorist minions.
@northernstar48113 жыл бұрын
@@tomixtomix8532 So why did the Serbian royal family ie: regent Prince Paul, recognise the "Banovina of Croatia"? The "Banovina of Croatia" was bigger than the current Republic of Croatia and included most of Herzegovina.
@jansobieski62403 жыл бұрын
@@tomixtomix8532 You just keep saying that to yourself...
@user-xj3ve7wt8k3 жыл бұрын
I see many people are a little confused. The name of the country is "Bosnia and Herzegovina". Neum is located in Herzegovina. 99% of the people in Neum, Herzegovina are Croats. Although, "legally" Herzegovina is currently part of Bosnia, the policy is oriented towards the EU and NATO, and all investments and money come from Croatia. Because of the war of the 90s, the Croats agreed with the Dayton Agreement that Herzegovina be part of Bosnia, to end the war, and so "Bosnia and Herzegovina" was created. The title of the video is actually wrong, because he is talking about Herzegovina, not Bosnia ( two different regions of the country ).
@storymatters73093 жыл бұрын
Its like saying Dalmatia isn't Croatia o.O The name Herzegovina came form an Herzog who was the ruler of this part of BOSNIA, nothing else.
@user-xj3ve7wt8k3 жыл бұрын
@@storymatters7309 No one ever said that Dalmatia is not Croatia. Drugs are bad, m'kay...
@storymatters73093 жыл бұрын
@@user-xj3ve7wt8k bla bla bla
@user-xj3ve7wt8k3 жыл бұрын
@@storymatters7309 Slow in the brain ?
@kevgriffin70622 жыл бұрын
Utter rubbish. This bridge will not cut off Bosnia from the Adriatic and Mediterranean.
@hrki11173 жыл бұрын
Nevidim di je problem neum je nas ? A da dodu do otvorenog mora moraju preko nase vode i kraj nasih otoka lol inzinjeri brodogradnje iz sarajeva hahahhahahaha
@tweetybird303 жыл бұрын
They have tried to ethnically clense Croats from Bosnia and Hercegovina. They tried make us non existent in BiH. They treated our people porly in the modern history and in the end chose who will represent Croatians in BiH and he's not even a Croat.... So I say, for the first time in my life that I am proud of our president and the decission to finally make a stand against those bullies and cut their funds. They're too gracious with letting them use the port of Ploče but they do it for our people in BiH. 🥂🥂🥂 Long live who ever made that bold decision and said "ENOUGH" to the low lives who run the governement in our neighbouring country!!!
@PatriotRepublikeBiH2 жыл бұрын
Never saw such an bullshit lol Herceg Bosna was never Recognized by anyone like Republika Srpska t(till Dayton agreement) and AP West Bosnia also HVO the Croatian army in Bosnia betrayed the Bosnian Army in Herzegovina also HVO did the most ethnic Cleansing after VRS and West Bosnia go learn some history wanna have my sources en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croat-Bosniak_War
@tomusklisus58053 жыл бұрын
As a person who went on Holliday every year to Komarna The biggest ship i every saw there would fit under the Jadranski most in Zagreb | | A River crossing Bridge in The capital City Bridge of Jadranski Most
@matthew_turkmen74823 жыл бұрын
true
@ranilabeyasinghe3 жыл бұрын
Ah this channel is like Caspian Report 2.0.
@jamesrocket56163 жыл бұрын
I've watched the Caspian Report video before this
@asterixx68783 жыл бұрын
The bridge will block Bosnian aircraft carriers and supertankers. 😂😂😂😂
@brodoslavmilivojev45433 жыл бұрын
Bosnia is too poor to build a port in Neum, the country has a gdp of 13 billion dollars and it is decreasing every year, thus redering it usless for potential investors not to mention that Neum itself is a small town without proper infrastructure for something like a cargo or passanger port
@Mico6053 жыл бұрын
I live in Bosnia and i can tell you this bridge doesn't block anything. There is no cargo port in Neum even tho geographically it would make sense to have one in that location. But geopolitical situation and the fact borders are so messed up in that part make cargo port just a pipe dream.
@ShortHororStories2 жыл бұрын
Bosnia has no acces to sea because the name is Bosnia and Herzegovina, both have their regions and Neum is located in Herzegovina
@florijancindric2 жыл бұрын
I am from that area and your statement that the bridge will block bosnia is such a stupid statement.
@fredrikstadtilian3 жыл бұрын
ok, this is what I call quality content Greetings from Croatia
@MrKukec3 жыл бұрын
BS !
@natasamatijas99453 жыл бұрын
@@MrKukec ?
@djespo693 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Greetings to you from Louisiana. I want to visit. How good is the language barrier? Will they understand me if I ask where is the restroom?
@MrKukec3 жыл бұрын
@@natasamatijas9945 bulshit!
@MrKukec3 жыл бұрын
@@natasamatijas9945 if someone did this to America we would burned em to the ground... guess why !?
@adi13193 жыл бұрын
I dont understand why this video is even made, Bosnian waters are too shallow for ships, we use Port of Ploče in Croatia anyway,
@adamsiroky1613 жыл бұрын
This video is about bridge. That it will bock Bosnia is just clickbait.
@Qingep3 жыл бұрын
This is cool, i hope the best for Croatia and Bosnia
@FromthisInstanceOn3 жыл бұрын
really well presented and researched. I am bosnian and as long as the deal to use the Ploce port is fair, I dont have too many objections in its existence. Neum is better as a tourist town.
@fapmashina12 жыл бұрын
Very rational, normal and fair comment!
@svjetlangavranic70473 жыл бұрын
This doesn't concerned anyone! We-Croatia finally connected our own mainland and that's it. Who does not like it-tough break. Croatia is finally connected!🇭🇷
@flynnjp193 жыл бұрын
Why is a Chinese company bidding and WINNING the contract to build a bridge inside the EU, that is maddness!
@MaxMustermann-gf4te3 жыл бұрын
Why Russians are getting sanctions which countries like croatia have to follow, while Germany and Russia are building the nord stream? This is madness! Eu sucks. Idea was nice. But it always will stay an idea.
@stipebalenovic64972 жыл бұрын
I dont think anybody will have to worry about maritime future of Bosnia and Herzegovina. BiH hardly has any highways, not much of an economy, its all mountains, port potential is laughable (they rent our harbour Ploče). Oh and that area of BiH? Its all Croats living there, we call them Hercegovci as in the latter part of the name: Bosnia and Herzegovina.
@pezzyy992 жыл бұрын
No, this bridge is connecting Croatia, since Yugoslavia has split up!
@paulallen810917 күн бұрын
Whoever claimed anything else in this video?
@willi193913 жыл бұрын
HRVATSKA pobjeđuje, jugoslaveni umiru! O kako je danas lijep i sunčan dan! 🇭🇷🇭🇷🇭🇷🇭🇷🇭🇷🇭🇷🇭🇷🇭🇷🇭🇷
@dalibortrupina4322 жыл бұрын
99% of Neum population are Croats,so the easiest thing would be to give Neum back to Dalmatia,since they are Dalmatians not Bosnians,Bosnia is 180 km away from Neum. You have to travel 180 km from Neum thru Herzegovina to reach nearest Bosnian city like Uskoplje or Livno,where majority of population is,again Croats!
@zarjesve22 жыл бұрын
How this will BLOCK Bosnia? Title is so missleading...
@michaelf70933 жыл бұрын
I went through the Neum corridor, summer 2019. Can confirm that it is a pain.
@briantravelman3 жыл бұрын
I think a lot of Croatians and even foreigners would be happy about this. I think it's dumb that Croatians need a passport to visit a section of their own country, just because Bosnia wanted access to the sea.
@Cristiano-kb8gu2 жыл бұрын
And Neum is populated by 97.56% Croats! They want the bridge!
@matijakovacic33612 жыл бұрын
Bosnia is land-locked. It has no access to sea. On the other hand Herzegovina is not (and hence Bosnia-and-Herzegovina) is not. Please use proper names of things you are talking about. Would you constantly talk about 'Trinidad' when talking about the country named 'Trinidad and Tobago'?
@danyzuhj11 ай бұрын
I'm croatian but my grandparents and parents have a lot of land in Neum in kamenice and im glad they built the bridge less traffic 😅😂
@brunobastasic46663 жыл бұрын
I drive every summer to Dubrovnik from Zagreb and its so annoying to go through border chekpoints just to get to other side of my country. And after all Bosnia woulde probably never build a port beceuse Neum is way to small for that.
@khalidi50443 жыл бұрын
Ne možete mnogo učiniti kada ne dozvolite Bosni da ima pristup moru. Osim Neuma.
@joskocibilic90043 жыл бұрын
@@khalidi5044 A da Vi meni date nešto svoje,kuču ili zemlju ili tako nešto?😁
@Croat9553 жыл бұрын
@@khalidi5044 zapravo je suprotno bosna bi nama trebala dati cijelu hercegovinu
@matthew_turkmen74823 жыл бұрын
@@khalidi5044 što, da damo BIH dio Hrvatske da bi imali širi pristup na more? zašto?
@krasnajaprkusic33892 жыл бұрын
NEUM JE HRVATSKA, ZBOG INTERESA JE BIO POKLONJEN. PA SADA, DRŽIMO MOST. 🇭🇷❤️
@yespeace20003 жыл бұрын
This bridge isn't blockin anything or anybody. It's like saying the bridge on the Bosphorus is blocking Black Sea.
@adrijanpogorelic14003 жыл бұрын
Hrvatske ceste means croatian roads
@simecki42223 жыл бұрын
💪🏻🇭🇷💪🏻 Croats are also dominantly populated on south of Bosnia.
@643240373 жыл бұрын
Nema vas 15 hiljada ukupno lol
@simecki42223 жыл бұрын
@@64324037 kaže Bošnjo koji čini 50% stanoništva vlastite zemlje 😂