This is almost beyond commnication in its beauty and magnificence. The whole thing is enhanced by the extraordinary production, with the great philosopher seated solemnly in his black suit with white shirt, and the lighting almost Rembrandt-esque. The man's animation, his LOVE OF WISDOM, comes through here in an "eternal now." He actually looks younger here, at eighty-nine, than he did when I met him 1976, at age seventy-six. We met in the university cafeteria for half an hour. In my youthful naivete, I wanted to know what he thought about something or other. I'll never forget what he suggested: "Don't try to UNIVERSALIZE this." He had brought his wife to the week-long visit. The dean remarked privately that his spirit seemed to sag when she had to return home. He wears his wedding band on his right hand--either she died or there was a divorce. I think his remarks here are partly inspired by grief; and yet also by the "consolations" that this very deep philosophy provides. At one point, during the seminars, in a reply to someone's question, he made the gesture of a warrior pulling back the string on a bow. This profound, embodied and all-encompassing spiritedness breaks through time and space, then, now and forevermore.
@waltershumer4211 Жыл бұрын
That's incredible well said!
@jdzentrist8711 Жыл бұрын
@@waltershumer4211 Thank you 😊
@kenneth1767 Жыл бұрын
Thank you, I was wondering how old he was while listening to him speak of having lived through both wars. The joy and then the loss, all one - of the same river.
@philoofsophia8993 жыл бұрын
Been waiting for this to be re-uploaded. Thank you so so much. I've fallen HARD in love with Gadamer because of this channel.
@spiritualneutralist25973 жыл бұрын
When I grow up I want to be Gadamer.
@filosofiaeducacion40512 жыл бұрын
Me too
@anasuyaa2 жыл бұрын
Why
@Impaled_Onion-thatsmine2 ай бұрын
Get a phd when your 60 in league of legends? Which literally defined all science and post bachelor study as unlawful methodology of ontology and not truth value....this guy is seriously overlooked and should have been studied extensively in that program we made in canada?
@hugobertacchini35692 жыл бұрын
Es ist großartig Gadamer zu hören!❤️ Vielen Dank für ihre Bemühung und liebe Grüße aus Valencia Spanien!
@g.slothouwer9983 жыл бұрын
Such a shame that this kind of speech doesn't exist anymore, on the radio or in a podcast.
@sibanbgd1002 жыл бұрын
Sure it does. You just need to search for it
@michaelconnolly39902 жыл бұрын
At least it exists here.
@skalitstudio2208 Жыл бұрын
@@sibanbgd100name drop some podcasts please!
@YM-cw8so Жыл бұрын
Don't generalize everything with your own ignorance
@edgarh787911 ай бұрын
@@skalitstudio2208The Nietzsche Podcast by essentialsalts is my absolute favorite philosophical Podcast. In Episode 5 he also focuses on Heraclitus!
@romans91843 жыл бұрын
lovely video ... my favorite line is from 18:20 "with quotes, one can prove anything" ... indeed!
@cheri238 Жыл бұрын
This is so interesting. Thank you. ❤️ I have not heard of Gadamer before.
@robford32112 күн бұрын
@cheri He is only the most important of Heidegger students although Arendt is perhaps better known to general public
@mazyar_ Жыл бұрын
Ein großartiges und informatives Interview
@juanjuan-xr5vc3 жыл бұрын
You are doing a great job with this channel. Keep up the good work! Greetings from Chile.
@AlexanderKoryagin3 жыл бұрын
Simply beautiful!
@robertb1138 Жыл бұрын
Thanks much for providing this.
@thomassimmons1950 Жыл бұрын
TS Eliot's Four Quartets is perhaps the poetic expression of this.
@jurijsrjabokons75092 жыл бұрын
Heraclitus was a favorite Philosophers amongst various modern philosophers.
@Kurolicht3 жыл бұрын
Gracias!
@Aes0n2 жыл бұрын
Brilliant.
@uniphcommunity.thewhitetower Жыл бұрын
An enlightening view from a great philosopher!
@kenneth1767 Жыл бұрын
Those observant moments when the fire of Heraclitus ignited passion in the eyes of Gadamer. With hindsight Tolkien could have added Gadamer to the memorable characters in his epic tale.
@Dr.Bercest3-c9e Жыл бұрын
Turkiyeden selamlar. Sizi kutluyorum bilgeliginiz her zaman beni içten mutlu ediyor. Bu kadaryorum bilgisine bagli olup hala devam etmenizi ayrica tebrik ediyorum. 21. Yüzyılin en iyi felsefesini yapan adamdır 🙌🙏🌹🇹🇷
@das.gegenmittel Жыл бұрын
What a gift
10 ай бұрын
Greatfull
@myla6135 Жыл бұрын
Wonderful. His view on opposites existing together reminds me of Chinese cosmology and the forces of Yin and Yang which always go together. Life and death, wet and dry, love and hate. You can't have one without the other yet we (in the modern world in the West) seem always to want to get rid of one and cling on to the other. A hopeless task.
@lokeshparihar76722 жыл бұрын
what is the title of book which he is reading?
@ShmaerkWards2 жыл бұрын
It's just called "Die Vorsokratiker", a collection of all the Pre-Socratic writings in one book. I think it has been around for several centuries in the German-speaking world actually. He speaks of it with some contempt which is probably down to the interpretative annotations: The book gives an introduction to each of the Pre-Socratics, biographical bits, and explanations of their central points, but of course these explanations/summaries are debatable sometimes. Still, it gives you the writings of all the Pre-Socratics in one book, in both Greek and German, so it is naturally very handy. There will be something like this in English, too. Hope that helps.
@XD226 Жыл бұрын
27:08
@czarquetzal83442 жыл бұрын
So Nietzsche got his idea of 'eternal recurrence ' to the conception of fire by Heraclitus.
@sibanbgd1002 жыл бұрын
Oh, if only it was so simple
@czarquetzal83442 жыл бұрын
@@sibanbgd100 owwws? As if you understand the video.
@sibanbgd1002 жыл бұрын
@@czarquetzal8344 This video? Why do you think that I don't and even if I don't what does that have to do with Nietzsches eternal recurrence?
@czarquetzal83442 жыл бұрын
@@sibanbgd100 see? You don't get the point. Paradox of ignorance. I can't help you with that
@sibanbgd1002 жыл бұрын
@@czarquetzal8344 I'll give you an unironic benefit of the doubt and presume that you are right about my ignorance. Would you be so kind as to tell me what I'm missing?
@aleenanixon1111 Жыл бұрын
🙏
@jimtzikis Жыл бұрын
I have the impression that he reads the greek text in Erasmian pronunciation.
@darrylthomas8152 жыл бұрын
I wonder what Gadamer thought of Schopenhauer...
@darrylthomas8152 жыл бұрын
LOL, I just saw the lecture on AS...
@iallalli52232 жыл бұрын
Heraclitus! Ubiquitous. That is I of Me. That is I of you, your real Self. I am whatever I am. Moses said, I am who I am, God. When you say, Aah, that's I of you. When you say, Uuh, that's I of you. Come to I of you, then you'll see, that Aah and Uuh is the made of the same I of you. There the sky is the earth, so whatever everything is the nondual I of each people. Never birth never die, the movement in the nonmovement, the light of Life. The Transcendental and the Ubiquitous! Return to Me, the I of your real Self. Ahu!!@
@jdzentrist8711 Жыл бұрын
Vedanta rocks
@Dreadwinner Жыл бұрын
😎
@dan0203503 жыл бұрын
✌️
@allsgodisall87872 жыл бұрын
The One I Am Presence in all (diversity) that is.
@dharmapalsharma2679 Жыл бұрын
🌺🕎🕉️☪️☯️🛐🔯☦️🌺 Ausgezeichnet 🌺🌺🌺
@tomato10407 ай бұрын
10:00-04: Yah,🤓everything, everyone is🙏 ONE=mc2☝️Grand🌕Mosaic & WE=mc2 are the👣pieces 🧩in the💓puzzle putting back together the broken💔 pieces in our lives in shy🪭😔places, like😔little🐟coy🐠fish chasing crumbs when the "Bread🍞of🥪LIFE=mc2"🧬is🏹👀 really♾️Infinitely🌌, N🎯W⚛️eternally♾️set⚖️right🇮🇱B4🤲US🇺🇲😂!
@drjohnswilkins3 жыл бұрын
Obscure? I heard of him when I was ten.
@michaelconnolly39902 жыл бұрын
I think he is referring to the meaning of Heraclitus' thought as obscure, not Heraclitus himself.
@drjohnswilkins2 жыл бұрын
@@michaelconnolly3990 That makes a lot more sense. But is that simply because we only have apothegms rather than a coherent argument?
@pectenmaximus2312 жыл бұрын
I heard of him when I was implanting in the uterine wall. Top that!
@drjohnswilkins2 жыл бұрын
@@pectenmaximus231 Well, I *first* heard of him in Plato's heaven before I was conceived.
@ShmaerkWards2 жыл бұрын
@@michaelconnolly3990 Correct. Gadamer calls him "der Dunkle". Literally, this means "the dark one". But in German, Dark can also be used to express something like Incomprehensible, Mystifying, Impenetrable, Elusive, Hidden. So it's Obscure in the sense that his thought was mystifying and hard to grasp. I think Heraclitus had been referred to as "the Obscure" in this sense ever since Antiquity. So yes, if Gadamer had meant Obscure as in Unknown, then he'd have called him something entirely different, "der Unbekannte" or something.
@2msvalkyrie529 Жыл бұрын
Suggestive ?!? Pronounced with German accent ? Is that German ? Thomas Mann would not approve !
@baskerbom44722 жыл бұрын
What a fool. Heraclitus is not about all is one. What Heraclitus means is that everything is one through a binary opposition, and it is the binary opposition that is the core of Heraclitus works, not the oneness.
@tarhunta21112 жыл бұрын
That's what he's saying.
@pectenmaximus2312 жыл бұрын
You’re the fool writing comments without watching a whole video. Gadamer makes precisely the point you think he somehow missed (and he makes it about 10 times with examples, including suggesting that most commenters misinterpret the river as being about flux when it is about opposition in unity).
@baskerbom44722 жыл бұрын
@@pectenmaximus231 well, i guess to some extend we are all fools.