Game Changer? Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8 Contemporary DG DN

[@firehorseweddingphotograph3995]

Great lens. I have had it on my S5 for a few weeks now and a commercial shoot yesterday. Superb results, photo and video. It’s perfect for events and portraits 👌

[@encoreflix2377]

I'm looking to get it to replace my 20-60 on my S5 and be my workhorse lens. Not a lot of reviews out comparing the two.

[@robertcudlipp3426]

We all differ. For me, that extra 4,not 2, mm at the wide angle end is very important. Yes, the price appeals, however I try to purchase lens for life. Were I to seriously contemplate purchasing this lens , would also need to get a wide angle prime, such as the Samyang 22/2.

[@jiffijoff9780]

"Game changer" seems to have become the tech word of the year already. According to the amount of game changes I'm wondering if there are any standards left at all that are even possible to settle until they get changed by next game changer...... 🙈🙈

[@NaturweltQuellental4964]

👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@bryceporter5484]

i realize I am kinda off topic but do anyone know of a good website to stream newly released series online ?

[@Princeton_James]

Everything is a "game changer".

[@craigcarlson4022]

I appreciate the way you go into detail on its image quality attributes including considerations of micro contrast and bokeh, close range versus far off range.

[@sigmaphoto]

Thank you for the excellent overview. Very fair and comprehensive.

[@VoidShepherd]

I wish they would release more of the contemporary line for, MFT I have the 56mm 1.4 and the 30mm and they are some of the best glass I have owned.

[@firstmile]

Wow. You're great. You explain important things that all of those other reviews leave out.

[@theartofphotography]

I appreciate that!

[@Sintsoij]

Great review! I’m curious how you think this lens compares to the Tamron 28-75 2.8. Similar price and specs but 5mm more on the long end.

[@Dir.IvanoRobustellini]

sigma have better manual focus and sharper

[@dericsanchez4081]

Definitely looking to grab one of these once the issues are resolved and they start shipping.

[@evenios2831]

ordered one i got a few primes on the sony but NO zoom yet and i needed a good walk around lens i can go out and about and take scenery shots BUtT also if i meet someone interesting be able to take some decent portraits all with one lens and i think this will do just great! and open up more options!

[@wilson_law]

Why has this channel slowly moved to camera reviews? A few years ago when this first started it was all about ("The Art of Photography") composition, lighting, different techniques, etc. Why has this changed!? I subscribed because of learning, not for the reviews, and certainly not for squarespace. You used to say camera gear is not more important, instead learn how to shoot light how masters of photography do, now... its....

[@dyz2102]

Gear videos have massively more views. It’s good to keep a balance.

[@wilson_law]

@@dyz2102 yes i understand, but porn gets quite a lot of views too 🤔. i know its harsh and i dont mean it that way, but you get the idea.

[@aeskellion]

I really like the new thumbnail design you’ve got going on.

[@HDBnB1]

The *4mm, not 2, on the wide end is a pretty big deal but still looks like a really good lens.

[@lomarvgc1580]

I would love if sigma could do the 16-35 alternative soon

[@jimwlouavl]

Nice review with a practical emphasis. I’ve been a Sigma fan for 40 years.

[@misahorna]

I love to see another fellow left eye shooter 👁️ I've been here often I respect Your work!

[@PaoloInselvini82]

Sir you are one of the best reviewer on KZbin you are clear, direct to the point it's a pleasure to hear you.

[@theartofphotography]

I appreciate that!

[@TheLAinME]

I had this for a few weeks on a Leica SL2S. Super disappointed about corner sharpness compared to Nikon’s Z zooms (evens the f/4 24-70), so I returned it. Lovely handling though.

[@Reno_T]

Interesting first look. I just feel strange that there is no mention of the strongest competitor the Tamron 28-75 F2.8 🤔

[@gabrielhaggebrink6700]

Hah, came to the comments to find this discussion. Same here. Might be to maintain Sigma early access privileges or something like that, but I must admit it somewhat eats into the credibility of the reviewer, at least when it's such an obvious omission. What else is not being said?

[@nidibouphotography]

I don’t really like gear reviews, but it is always a pleasure watching yours.

[@DCFotographs]

For landscape, the tamron is sharper?

[@joergkampers_photography]

1:37 "trade-off is 2mm"?? Guess we are talking 4mm ;-) which could be significant. Nevertheless a great review. I preordered mine a couple of weeks ago.

[@Daniel_Zalman]

I was looking at the sample images on DPReview. Honestly, for the price, the image quality is shocking. Very sharp and very pleasing bokeh (not top of the line bokeh, but really pleasant). I actually found the bokeh to be nicer than on Sigma's 24-70 2.8. The lens is sharper than the Sony 24-70 GM ver. 1. Yes, SONY's newer 24-70 is better, but it's also approx. 2.3x more expensive.

[@Mraz75]

I guess a game changer for Sigma lens users only. That was why he did not say anything nor compare to Tamron. Because in Malaysia we do look at Sigma lenses for camera and they are very good. I rarely hear people use Tamron here. Although the price is affordable here. But Sigma has a good branding here. Well i just love this lens just don’t have the money yet 😅

[@Qwiv]

No comparison to the tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 sony, which gives you 5mm on the back and??

[@connorkasnik]

Very nice video! Just picked up my first Sony camera switching from Canon and was looking around for some full frame glass. I have used the 18-35 1.8 for EVER when shooting video and was sad when I couldn’t use it. I love sigma so I went with the 24-70 2.8 art just because I have had good luck and no BS with the art line. BUT I was seriously looking at this 28-70 as a option and I still things it’s a fantastic value for money lens that many many people should keep there eyes on 👀

[@scottparis6355]

Interesting; good price. (I'm just not in the market for any $2000 lenses.) I do kind of wish more of these mid-range zooms were just a little longer -- 85 or so maybe.

[@CarlosDavidFoto]

24-105mm is worth looking at

[@residenttouristprod]

I have the Panasonic Pro 24-70mm f2.8 and enjoy the results on my S1 series bodies. However, for travel and lightweight carry use on my diminutive and yet powerful S5, I am looking for a M43 alternative. This is the use case for me as both systems offers small and LW solutions with compromises with the Sigma resulting f2.8 on a FF sensor.

[@CodyStoner20]

I have (and LOVE) the 24-70 2.8 DG DN Art lens for my S1 and in comparison this is impressively small. I would definitely miss the extra 4mm on the wide end though.

[@DavidChiriboga]

I’m about to purchase my first pro full frame camera(Sony A7C), Im contemplating this as my first lens for general usage. I checked out the 24-70 Art Lens at the store and it feels a bit heavy/bulky for causal usage. Would you say the size and weight of the Art Lens is overkill for an amateur like myself’s general usage. Not sure how much I would really need that 24mm. Thanks for any input!

[@CodyStoner20]

@@DavidChiriboga I don't think the 24-70 is too big but I have it on a Panasonic S1 which is a pretty big body. If you don't think you'll miss the extra 4mm on the wide end and want something more compact (the size alone might make it a better match for the a7c) than the 28-70 might be the way to go. Plus you'd have an extra couple hundred dollars to spend on filters or whatever. Either option is gonna be pretty solid though.

[@DavidChiriboga]

@@CodyStoner20 Ok, awesome. Thanks so much for your input! Makes sense.

[@tash_views]

Good price. But there are way too many "ifs" and "buts". Like for all the things you said are the pros for this lens, there is something faulty as well. So game changer it is not. If anything, the canon rf 28-70 f2 might be but that lens is way too expensive.

[@Blackmachismoo]

I want one for z mount

[@BootStrapTurnerVideography]

Have the “Art” edition of the lens. I recommend just another $200 to get the Art edition, although it is much heavier.

[@muqeemulhaq3568]

Night sky/milkyway/astro-photography with this lens?

[@HSNG10]

How is this a "game changer" when Tamron did this with their excellent, light and affordable 2875F2.8 years before this Sigma?

[@YoungBlaze]

Well, ...brand loyal

[@istvanjanosi9961]

Exactly. Thumb down

[@Donbros]

This is useless release imo. I really don't like sigma lens releaseas these days. Its nothing interesting or new. Samyang tamron and of course sony all release awesome lenses, while sigma makes more metal versiom of alreasy made ones and not better - sad. Hope they make some wide angle zoom to redempt

[@Daniel_Zalman]

How's the autofocus?

[@WildOutdoorLiving]

Their 24-70 f2.8 Art lens is $1100 for reference. So $300 difference for reference.

[@connorkasnik]

That was my thinking to! I went with the 24-70 Art. But it’s a heavy lens so I can totally see why someone would want the convenience of this nice contemporary one for travel and hiking and what not

[@limagepicture9023]

@@connorkasnik get the Sony 24-105 F4. Superb stalilized zoom Lens.

[@priyadarshinifilms5472]

1100 - 900 = 200

[@TheFresh831]

Clearly you can’t count!

[@DavidChiriboga]

@@connorkasnik Exactly why I’m contemplating this as my first lens for my A7C. Not sure the 24-70 is too practical for causal usage/travel for an amateur like me. However I don’t want to skimp on any quality, hope this is a good choice 🤞🏼

[@wadeduvall7026]

Contemporary is so good! Time to dump my Art glass :'(

[@jakejamesdougal]

Investing in the more budget C line makes sense if you prefer it, but if you already have the A glass it would be nonsensical to dump it, unless you're swapping out DG HSM for DG DN for e-mount. While this lens looks great I won't be swapping my 24-70 Art DG DN for it.

[@wadeduvall7026]

@@jakejamesdougal Don't worry, I'm mostly joking. I do a lot of hiking so the extra oz sting a little bit.

[@jakejamesdougal]

@@wadeduvall7026 Haha that's fair, as a fellow outdoorsman photog I feel that pain. Good for the biceps though...

[@DavidChiriboga]

@@wadeduvall7026 I’m about to purchase my first pro full frame camera(Sony A7C), Im contemplating this as my first lens for general usage. I checked out the 24-70 Art Lens at the store and it feels a bit heavy/bulky for causal usage. Would you say this is the best bet for someone like me? Thanks for any input.

[@thatsreallyamoon]

@@DavidChiriboga did you end up making the choice? Considering swapping my Sony 24-105 F4 for this lens for the A7c. I hate wide angles, so that 28mm is absolutely no problem. Just care more about compactness now... And that aperture lol.

[@BizzleByron]

Yeah I’ll stick with the trusty Tamron - it’s on my body 75% of the time.

[@rogeriogomesosorio4755]

Hello. Great video, as always. Can I use this lens with my sony A6600? Thanks.

[@Michaelpai1230]

Yes but factor in the crop factor for field of view.

[@Raymondey]

28 minus 24 is 4 (not "2" as you mention twice) 😶

[@huongvechanhphap5674]

How much forr itM Tkss!

[@tykimikk8605]

rather get the tamron 28-75 2.8 though

[@leonarddavis8449]

Game changer, no. I like the Rembrandt lighting.

[@Jack-qn6vy]

Thanks for the heads up on the issue Sigma reported with the 28-70. I actually had just received one in the mail that was covered by the serial numbers referenced by Sigma. I am returning the lens for that reason, but in the brief time we spent together I would say it was more of a love affair than a negative relationship ;) For people who are interested, it is so light and small, it felt like the 35-70 zoom lenses of the old days. I was not put off by the plastic compound, and it felt pretty solid. Much easier to carry than the 24-70 options. I did feel a little more limited without the extra wide reach of a 24, but then again I also felt limited at the 70mm range, so you might say I’m just lazy! This lens and the 45mm by sigma tell me they are on to something good - that is, lenses that are optically good, don’t break the bank, and chart new territory in the never ending attempt to balance performance and cost with size and weight. This may be the best lens that I’ve ever instantly returned!

[@CarlosDavidFoto]

A lens that has existed in many forms for decades is now a "game changer" ? Ugh.

[@AlGollas]

Are you using this Sigma 28-70mm lens for this video? What focal length are you at in this video?

[@YoungBlaze]

maan , this lens is sold out everywhere, even sigma doesnt have it lol edit Noww i see why its not available due to the sigma fixing the issue lol cudos to sigma

[@sinisalomikko]

So it´s a good budget sigma lens. What´s the "game changer" ? :D

[@weiguovisuals]

why is this lens out of stock everywhere

[@llStixxll]

Because of the recall that he mentioned at the start of the video.

[@kendrarivera2355]

does it work on my a6000 camera?

[@yourmommashouse]

Yes

[@wilcurran3377]

It extends when zoomed, sorry but I'm out.

[@peterferry1646]

Not for me I m not a sony nore a L mount shooter.

[@punkrachmaninoff]

Honestly I can't decide which one would make more sense for me, this or the new Sony 40mm 2.5 G... Or both!?

[@jaimecabrera482]

I got both and I’ve found use for both lenses in different situations.

[@jeffzanin5503]

28-24=4

[@theartofphotography]

Thanks for the correction Fibonacci…

[@arturodfabela]

Hola precioso :)

[@yourmommashouse]

I don’t get it, the 24-70 isn’t much more money

[@raksh9]

The 28-70 is smaller and lighter than the 24-70. It's a decent tradeoff if size and weight are important.

[@DavidChiriboga]

I held them both in my hands, and as a non profesional, I’m leaning towards the 28-70 because of its size and weight for casual usage. Unless someone really convinced me otherwise to get the 24-70. Tough call, but seems more practical to me to get this one.

[@chaoyizhang2360]

@@DavidChiriboga Yeah you are non-professional, honestly 24mm vs 28mm is such a huge difference.