The work you have done it’s incredible! It leads to even deeper studies and GREAT wisdom, that unfolds and reveals the mechanics of our existence and the TRUE reality of everything! Thank you!!!!! (If that “thank you” can be enough).
@MozALoser9 жыл бұрын
I'm just in the beginning stages of learning Hebrew. Sooo interesting. It is the pure language as Elohim said it is. There is so much depth of meaning. Like a DNA strand. You see the surface but yet there are strands upon strands to make the whole.
@aquillafleetwood81805 жыл бұрын
Google, the Northern Cross, by Aquilla Fleetwood, youtube!
@ancienthebreworg13 жыл бұрын
@Axxeeellll1992 You're welcome and thank you. Yes, I wish more would understand Hebrew from this perspective, it would help much in Biblical studies. Unfortunately, most are simply learning the language from a Modern Hebrew perspective.
@ancienthebreworg14 жыл бұрын
@YahwehFills There are only two ways YHWH Elohiym can be understood/translated. One is "YHWH of Elohiym" and the other is "YHWH the Elohiym." In Genesis I used the first, but in Exodus I used the second as I am leaning toward that understanding of the phrase at this time. If the :YHWH of Elohiym is correct, then it implies that YHWH is part of the Elohiym, if the YHWH the Elohiym is correct, then it can imply that YHWH is the Elohiym, or one of the Elohiym.
@randyallen84405 жыл бұрын
God bless you brother thanks for your teachings any wisdom pray for Israel
@ancienthebreworg15 жыл бұрын
Yes, I completely understand and do admit that the idea of Hebrew (or more accurately Semitic) being the oldest language is not easily defended, but there is some interesting evidence of this in the Hebrew Bible when we look at the names prior to, and after, the Tower of Babel account. Prior to the account all the names listed in the geneologies are Hebrew/Semitic. Only after the account do we find non-Hebrew/Semitic names. Of course, this evidence is dependent upon the accuracy of the text.
@aquillafleetwood81805 жыл бұрын
Google, the Northern Cross, by Aquilla Fleetwood, youtube! The Semitic language came from God.......
@Ahveddo10 жыл бұрын
I have enjoyed this Gen 1.1 teaching.thnx
@lazarusrajkumarm83034 жыл бұрын
Excellant explanation..thank you
@jamiestone91583 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/bpTclpJ-lsyNes0
@Brother-Joshua11 жыл бұрын
I find it interesting that you choose to equate the idea of fattening with the word filling in this context. To me fattening or fatten seems more related to the word expand or than to the word fill. Though filling is related to expand in a sense of causality, fill a balloon and it expands. however if you use the word fill to explain it, you leave out the thought that elohim contributed to the existence of earth sky etc..
@YahnatanBenAhav14 жыл бұрын
Excellent video series. :) I have a question for you in regards to the Mechanical Translation of the text of Genesis 2. Within this chapter the title/name “LORD God” is found in most English versions. However, I realize that in Hebrew this is “yhwh elohiym.” It appears that this is using the construct state that you discuss in the videos...
@ConsideringPhlebas13 жыл бұрын
Interesting stuff. The etymology part is particular fascinating. Regarding the word 'earth,' it's quite possibly of Semitic origin, or maybe older. The Arabic word الأرض (al-ard) is even more like the English than the Hebrew, but obviously it's a close relative. Edenics uses the example of 'road' which is also notable. Russian, for example has дорога (doroga), which is obviously similar in its root letters to the Arabic طريق (tareeq) and Hebrew דרך.
@ancienthebreworg14 жыл бұрын
@YahwehFills The Hebrew word Elohiym does not mean "God," but "mighty one" or "mighty ones." A mighty one is anyone or anything that has power and authority. Even Moses was an Elohiym, as are the angels. Therefore, it is very possible that the Elohiym are the angels (but not angels like we think of angels, that is a Greek concept of the "messengers," the literal meaning of the Hebrew mala'akiym.)
@ancienthebreworg15 жыл бұрын
In addition, I do believe that Biblical Hebrew evolved out of a Proto-Semitic language, similarly to Aramaic, Moabite, Akkadian, etc. But, I am pretty convinced that this proto-Semitic language is the origin to all other languages. Interestingly there are some very compelling similarities to it and Egyptian, Sanskrit and the Indo-European languages.
@aquillafleetwood81805 жыл бұрын
Google, Night Signs, by Aquilla Fleetwood, youtube! This can be read in Hebrew Word Pictures too, as long as it agrees with scripture! Yah, is written near the North Star!
@VictorLepanto11 жыл бұрын
I think connnecting "ha'aretz" to plate tectonics seems a bit far fetched to me. The connection to pottery is more likely. You use "the earth" the make pottery after all. As for the Earth (Ha'aretz) being "void," many Israeli newspaper readers would say Ha'aretz is still void. Forgive my corny puns.
@HojoOSanagi10 жыл бұрын
Some English words like Sack come from Hebrew by way of the Greeks borrowing the terms from Semitic peoples whom they regularly traded with and lived among, where Greeks and Phoenicians traveled throughout the Mediterranean. Sakkos, the Greek term became the Latin Saccus, then the Old English Sacc and modern Sack.
@jamiestone91583 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/bpTclpJ-lsyNes0
@YahnatanBenAhav14 жыл бұрын
@ancienthebreworg Oh okay. I suppose YHWH the Elohiym would make more sense from the traditional understanding. But if it was "of Elohiym," who/what is the other Elohiym?
@YahnatanBenAhav14 жыл бұрын
...You indicate this in your Mechanical Translation of Genesis 2. You translate this “YHWH” [He exists] of “Elohiym” [Powers]. I am curious, is there any significance in the “of” here? What is the meaning of these two nouns together? I know you do not major on interpretation, but what does the language itself indicate (if anything)?
@stephenzhao5809 Жыл бұрын
0:43 all those little broken pieces are called. ... as a singular as ostraca one piece of that fragment is in ostraca and all of the fragments are called ostracon I think I might have that backwards the ostracon is singular ostraca is plural. 👍1:03 interestingly what is the earth now did the ancient understand this I don't know is this a clue that the Hebrew language is divined or comes from Elohim itself I don't know but what is the earth but tectonic plates thay're like broken pieces of ostraca all over this globe it's almost like trying to take a broken piece of pottery and put it together and you have all these fractures in it. 1:26 4:55 Genesis 1 1 is a summary of the entire creation story the entire creation story is about Elohim filling up or fattening the sky and land it's a summary it identifies the entire story in one sentence [I really think more than that you mentioned above. It is also a decription of Metaverse The Primordial or House of God in the beginning then before]
@deborahbetty5815 жыл бұрын
Yes, I have read thatr as well; like Adam becoming/=> Ptah (:Egyptian) =>Alorus (Chaldean). (Secrets of the lost races; Rene Noorbergen, pg 11). All the 10 pre-deluvian patriarchs are translated into Egyptian and Chaldean language in subsequent order of (linear) time.
@jamiestone91583 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/bpTclpJ-lsyNes0
@johnnytilson88314 жыл бұрын
What's your thoughts on fixed earth not a spinning globe?
@YahnatanBenAhav14 жыл бұрын
@ancienthebreworg Hm. Very interesting.
@HojoOSanagi10 жыл бұрын
Over is similar in many languages. Over, yfir, ueber, super, hyper, sobre, sur, upari, upairi, ver, for, virs, etc... Uber/uper is thought to be the Indo-European root.
@Brother-Joshua11 жыл бұрын
exclude the word "or "after the word expand in the second sentence, it's a typo
@wayman2915 жыл бұрын
Interesting perspective, However I do belive that at times ethnocentrism plays a role in how we view ourselves, culture, and contributions to the world. Due to this I am not able to make the leap and say Hebrew is the oldest language. When I was in Africa, they told me all languages derived from the Egyptians. So I give credit where credit is due. Every culture and belief system participates in this sort of thing. I have seen the videos...lol
@aquillafleetwood81805 жыл бұрын
Google, Night Signs, by Aquilla Fleetwood, youtube!
@dds577 Жыл бұрын
“Land” in Hebrew is “Ereṣ (אֶ֥רֶץ)”, whose parent - root is “Raṣ (רץ)”, which means “fragment” or “bar”. Is this accidental? No, it isn’t an accident, since “Eretz (אֶ֥רֶץ)” can mean “land”, in contrast to Sea, or “fragment”, in a sense of regional, or the entire world.
@nasibsingh25657 жыл бұрын
In Sanskrit, the word used for earth is "DHARAT" means , which wear you like a mother bear a child, all the word , like ERAD , in Arbic or HARRAT in hibru , or ERATH" is the root comes from Sanskrit.because , non of these languages have the letter DH , in it
@jamiestone91583 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/bpTclpJ-lsyNes0
@darrellblanchard23627 жыл бұрын
it's not surprising that alot of english/anglish comes from hebrew. the word saxon comes from isacson
@aquillafleetwood81805 жыл бұрын
Google, Night Signs, by Aquilla Fleetwood, youtube!
@thegoodlydragon74523 жыл бұрын
Terra isn't backwards for Earth, it's just the Latin word for it. Why would the English word for earth come from Hebrew? English is a West Germanic language and earth is an old Germanic word.
@thegoodlydragon74523 жыл бұрын
Words like jubilee and hallelujah are acknowledged as coming from Hebrew because they actually do. The only Hebrew words in English are those that come in as loanwords. Any word of old Germanic stock, that can be directly traced back to the Anglo-Saxons when they first settled England, is not of Hebrew origin! Likewise, the reason why the dictionaries are mentioning Sanskrit is not to say that the word actually comes from Sanskrit, but that the English word and its Sanskrit cognate have a common ancestor in the language called Proto Indo-European (ancestor of all Indo-European words). I liked your videos on Biblical context, but the fact that you're making these egregious blunders, when as a scholar in this sort of thing you should know better, makes me seriously question your credibility. Dude, you're a hack.