Gravitational Waves Explained

[@LeiosLabs]

Man. This makes me want to pick up a paper and start researching again! Wait. That's precisely what my adviser wants me to do...

[@ProfessorSyndicateFranklai]

Listen to your advisor. Do more research. Keep on doing your PHD. Stay on as a Post-doc. Keep on listening to these sublimal messages. Ignore the fact that this is a youtube comment, this is not your advsior paying some bloke on the internet to say this...

[@ROBMCKISSOCK]

maybe you could start researching the space fabric that the gravity waves are rippling, see if you ever find any ! because you won't, it's not real and neither are gravity waves

[@amaris338]

WAIT DID YOU EVER FINISH WHAT YOUR ADVISOR WANTED YOU TO

[@LeiosLabs]

@@amaris338 I got my PhD if that's what you are asking

[@gamerjack1094]

Great video

[@ratulotron]

It's probably the best animation to understand gravitational waves under minutes.

[@radhikagoyal4129]

I love how simple this video is and yet does not gloss over any concept

[@joevarga5982]

I thought it glossed over everything.

[@nosrac95]

This was a very clear, understandable explanation so thank you very much for taking the time to make this video! Keep up the good work

[@mpsSalvadorian]

Finally another one of these type of videos!

[@archmikel7973]

+mpsSalvadorian yes

[@gardedog3902]

+mpsSalvadorian finally another one of these comments

[@mpsSalvadorian]

Hail Satan \m/

[@BigT.Larrity]

Hile Hydar

[@cobravenom1316]

Another one

[@dswif06]

Great video!! And now its confirmed!!

[@dswif06]

+dswif06 Gravitational waves that is!!! lol

[@PigsBeFlying]

+dswif06 No. This video is confirmed

[@frankdimeglio8216]

@@PigsBeFlying Consider the man who IS standing on what is the Earth/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The Earth is blue, AND the sky is blue. SO, overlay THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what is the Earth ! (The BLUE SKY is ALSO translucent !) GREAT. Objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. NOW, we proceed to the next step. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Invisible AND VISIBLE SPACE in fundamental equilibrium and BALANCE IS the MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE in fundamental RELATION to the universal fact that E=mc2 is F=ma. The Earth (A PLANET) involves BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=MC2 IS F=MA. The Earth AND the Sun are CLEARLY E=mc2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE pursuant to what is the BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE !!! Consider what is the speed of light (c), AND consider WHAT IS THE SUN. NOW, think about what is the Earth. Importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black ! Great. Accordingly, the Earth is in BALANCE with what is the Sun, AS the orange Sun represents what is LAVA ON BALANCE !!! Great. (Notice the role and relation of what is the EYElid.) The MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE is universally balanced to/with what is THE SUN AND the speed of light (c), AS E=MC2 IS F=MA !!! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Notice the black space of WHAT IS THE EYE, as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky IN BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what is the MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE; AS E=MC2 IS F=MA !!! The FULL DISTANCE in/of SPACE is truly linked AND BALANCED to/with what is THE MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE !!!; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!!!!! GREAT !!!! Notice that the viscosity of lava IS BETWEEN that of WATER AND the Earth/ground ! The orange Sun is the same size as THE EYE. Outstanding. E=mc2 IS F=ma as what is the BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE !!!! GREAT !!! LOOK at the progression AND THE BALANCE regarding FULL DISTANCE in/of SPACE, MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE !!!, AND A POINT (ALSO c) !!! E=mc2 IS F=ma !!!, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE !!! GREAT !!! It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. E=mc2 is F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE !!! TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=mc2 is F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME DILATION ultimately proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma !!!! INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience, AS E=MC2 IS F=MA ON BALANCE !!!; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY !!! GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=MA; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Accordingly, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution !!! Notice what is the fully illuminated (AND setting) Moon in DIRECT comparison with what is the orange Sun !!! Again, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A given PLANET (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out EQUAL AREAS in equal times consistent WITH/AS F=ma, E=mc2, AND what is perpetual motion, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=MA ON BALANCE !!!!!! GREAT. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma !!! By Frank DiMeglio

[@frankdimeglio8216]

Einstein was a known weasel.

[@torbjorneriksson9304]

It’s fascinating that Albert Einstein predicted gravitational waves in 1918 and it took almost a century, 2016, to prove him right.

[@haghalam0]

gravitational FUCKING waves confirmed, I love that

[@nouhailaamrani3444]

+haghalam0 I KNOW ! it's exciting. like hey kids, i was alive when that theory was confirmed, yessss you bet your ass i was

[@danielbeetsma6118]

+Nine Eleven Sounds like a solid paranoid line of thought, NineEleven. The Aether, hehe.

[@fun2badult]

+haghalam0 Yes Gravitational FUCKING waves!

[@fun2badult]

+Nine Eleven Tesla wasn't a physicist, he was an engineer. His method involves experiments while Einstein's method was all in his mind which have been proven to be true not by his statements, but with solid equations that Tesla would never be able to come up with. Einstein's mathematical equations gave us understanding of the whole universe. Aether has already been proven to be false and was left behind over a century ago

[@starwillow3563]

+Astro Physics Actually, Aether could be considered for just another name for "dark" matter. I'd just suggest googling that and seeing how it works. In fact there is a link to a video about "dark" matter at the end of this video that gives a pretty good definition.

[@graceb2404]

Another great video from PHD Comics! I have thoroughly enjoyed this. I hope there's more physics research videos soon.

[@rickquest6385]

What is pushing those marbles down upon the "rubber space-time fabric?" How can you use gravity to explain gravity?

[@aleksisdeagle4800]

Mind blown.

[@triton6490]

You are misinterpreting what he means. He means anything with mass will bend space time. He was using a simple analogy to portray that. There is nothing pushing it, it just bends space time because it had mass.

[@rickquest6385]

@@triton6490 I would think the analogy of forces like when holding a plastic ball filled with air under water everything will seek it's own level or pressure. But that may bring us back to iether which may be more accurate.

[@rxr2066]

@@triton6490 then why is it space time curvature only one way and not the other way

[@triton6490]

@@rxr2066 watch VSauces video "which way is down" he can explain ig better

[@mayurnawal]

Wow :) This is such a brilliant explanation for a fairly complex problem :) Thanks a lot

[@kusumkantasaxena5440]

Reading various articles trying to gather answer to few questions.This video made easy to grasp in a simple language.Thanx

[@llaauuddrruupp]

I fucking love science!

[@Nihilore]

+llaauuddrruupp explosm.net/comics/3557/

[@nhanchanhung]

+llaauuddrruupp *suddenly

[@vishnu14341]

+llaauuddrruupp YA I BET U DO

[@MouseGoat]

and I love fucking science!

[@nikolabrt]

Even though I'm really bad at physics, I understand gravitational waves much better now. Thanks for amazing explanation.

[@wokewoc]

The answer is YES THEY HAVE BEEN DISCOVERED! i am just so excited i dont understand this very well but i love this, Gravitulations everyone !

[@shreyadandapat9357]

Hey there, sorry to bother but my very close friend has just uploaded his first KZbin video on basics of gravitational waves , it would mean a lot uf you could check it out maybe leave a feedback ❤️ have a good day kzbin.info/www/bejne/gKvUe2p9Zt2Nj8k

[@ZexNobo]

Very nice and interesting, the italian subtitles are perfects also. Good job man :)

[@nodermark8922]

Am I the only religious man who loves science but now gets annoyed everytime there is a new discovery or invention atheists have to start screaming about how religion is stupid or that god isn't real or about how such thing was not written in the bible, quran, etc. Atheists have to understand that these are not science books you can't compare the two. Religions, atleast all the major ones, were never against science and all the instances in which that happened was because it went against the wishes of men who were already misusing religion to gain wealth or power. I love science. I love it very much,because, according to my beliefs, it is gods greatest gift to humanity which can be used to help people and lets and understand and enjoy this great universe. I'm even studying to become a doctor to use it to help people. All I'm saying is that people need to chill, everybody watching this vid is here to enjoy this new discovery so, weather you are religious or not, let other's enjoy this and stop spreading the hate.

[@thenewyorklife206]

+noder mark That's a fine message you've written there, but first and foremost, religion has historically had MAJOR problems with science and suggesting otherwise is pretty much a non starter. Then attempting to chalk religions issues with science up to the leaders of the religion is somewhat pointless as well - as they speak on behalf of your god. They are who all the religious folks look to for leadership from the word of their god. So you can't really whitewash that aspect either. If you want to believe in a god and science at the same time I'll say fill your boots, but science and everything we've discovered about our universe does not gel with anything in any of the major religious books. they provided all the answers and left no room in them for discovery such as this.

[@the80386]

+noder mark humans are emotional creatures. everybody has emotions and so everybody once in a while needs a scapegoat for letting their steam out. for many of the religious crowd it's the atheists. For many of the atheists no matter how unaffected by emotion they claim to be, the steam stills comes out and the scapegoat is the religious crowd. I try to remain positive in general so I see in this back and forth phenomenon as strengthening the fact that we humans, the most emotional creatures are functioning properly.

[@MMOplayeerr]

+noder mark Yeh, We could say God created physics and everything, nobody said science is wrong.

[@RaulZX8]

I agree completely with you. I believe in God and I'm going to start studying Mechatronics Engineering on April. Religion is completely compatible with science. They're not opposites, they're just in different fields of study. By the way, English isn't my first language, so I'm sorry if I didn't write this correctly :P.

[@arandomdude9588]

+noder mark dude, just ignore them

[@shiyu415]

this is so far the best video ever made about gravitational waves !!

[@i_am_ergo]

Great animation. Really fluid and to the point.

[@warrax111]

but disgusting colors, and style of animations.

[@xlint1000]

Nagyon köszönöm azoknak, akik a magyar feliratot készítették! :)

[@dandmarcus]

Someone is getting a Nobel Prize!

[@goliver9991]

+dandmarcus Yeah, Einstein ! XD

[@wdabrilvi]

+Mr.Halogames dead people doesnt get Nobels

[@filipe5722]

+dandmarcus Sadly not everyone who deserves it.

[@VidkunQL]

+Filipe Barroso To divide the Nobel prize among the people who were involved in this, they'd have to hand out sheets of gold leaf and toast with homeopathic champagne.

[@ashishkumarsharma1323]

Yeah they got!!👏

[@talibanshill.0001]

awesome video...great effort made to make such a clumsy topic simplified..

[@afridrasul]

Love 💕 the way of Einstein’s prediction of gravitational waves from general theory of relativity !! to 20th century LIGO experimental gravitational waves detection It’s actually a dream come true for Einstein 🤘🏼🤘🏼🤘🏼🤘🏼🤘🏼

[@Menas_N7]

Thank you for making these easy-to-understand videos! Already subscribed!

[@Erizzl3]

Love how at the time of this writing 40 people disliked this. Those 40 people probably think the world is not round.

[@musik-ym8rk]

this guy probably things everyone who hates a single guy from an ethnic minority is racist. boy dont generalise or stigmatizse pleeeease

[@martinevans8965]

I disliked it because it's wrong. "actually moving in a circle" - no, an ellipse. "not an actual force"..."very weak in the scale of other forces" and finally the reason earth goes around the sun is really the bending of time around the sun, not space.

[@justagenosfan]

@@martinevans8965 because of time bending? how exactly

[@martinevans8965]

@@justagenosfan nice username! You must have had that for years! What I meant was that this video implies that the space is curved, which is misleading because it's negligible. Actually, the rate of passage of time varies with distance from the large mass, which bends the geodesic.

[@justagenosfan]

​@@martinevans8965 but doesnt that mean gravity doesnt exist for objects without momentum

[@MisterD90x]

Very Informative, would love to see more, made the explanation simple enough so anyone can now understand what the subject is

[@makzmakz]

why do mass bend spacetime downward? Why not up? What causes the bending, gravity?

[@hajorm.a3474]

this is used to simplify the image of gravity...in reality it's more like bending the whole 4D fabric of space "Inwards".

[@makzmakz]

Still, bending something in order to produce a force requires a field of some sort? I.e. if gravitation causes the bending of spacetime, what is the field that is dragging the attracted masses "down" or "inward"? If I release a ball on the top of a hill and there is no gravity present, it will just sit there. I mean you can't have gravity to explain gravity?

[@hajorm.a3474]

+makzmakz without gravity, the ball and the hill wouldn't even be formed in the first place, but we can take an extreme case that, what if there is no planets and starts and a universe with just a ball, this ball will have it's own gravitational field and bend the whole universe.

[@hajorm.a3474]

gravity is caused by the existance of mass.

[@juanpablomina1346]

+makzmakz The bending is caused by the stress-energy tensor. If I remember correctly, it means that if you have energy (or momentum), you'll bend spacetime.

[@flameknight7]

this is a brilliant and easy way to explain how gravitational waves work!

[@MrRenoo94]

I still don't know how this is going to help us know the universe better

[@160p2GHz]

+Rayan Hamdan Because it's a totally new medium for astrophysicists to study things. They have basically only used light up until now, and now there is a totally new approach. It's like if you were studying a distant island you couldn't reach by boat and then you suddenly devised a way to measure the way the water breaks around the island by the waves that reach you on shore. Or it's like if you were deaf and had to rely largely on sight for things you couldn't touch, and then suddenly you can hear: you get a lot of new information about what you've been looking at. If you mean what it can be applied to, I think it's particularly useful for heavy dense things like black holes and neutron stars which are still pretty mysterious things in our universe. It would help, I imagine, people learn about other cosmological questions too regarding the nature of gravity and maybe help prove/disprove certain Grand Unified Theories.

[@zaparine]

Light and electromagnetic waves can be blocked by opaque objects. Gravitational wave isn't.

[@tats5229]

+Rayan Hamdan you are in a football stadium with all the floodlights on, and want to know who or what is standing at the other end. You whip out your binoculars (or Hubble Telescope) and are able to see the other end. Now suppose, someone turns off the floodlights, and the entire stadium turns dark. What good is your telescope then? This is where Gravitational Wave detection comes in handy. GWs are emitted by just about every celestial body, and remain virtually undisturbed while travelling through space (i.e. no disturbance from obstructions.). Thus, if we have enough sophisticated instrument to detect these tiny ripples, we can detect any celestial body, very much farther than our present sphere of sight, irrespective of its luminescence. PS: I'm no physicist, so any criticism or correction will be most welcome.. :)

[@crazyduck2265]

+TatS im not sure but gravitational waves works like mechanichal(not sure if this word is correct) waves.So they will be disturbed from other GW. OR am i wrong?

[@tats5229]

Crazy Duck GWs do not interact with matter, which is why it can travel through other bodies without getting disturbed. As for getting disturbed by other GWs, I think you are right and my previous suggestion that GWs can be used to detect any celestial body is wrong. We'll only be able to detect and study large celestial bodies like Black Holes, Supernovae etc. moving at considerable fraction of speed of light (hence, ruling out planets etc.) These strong GWs however will not be disturbed from the smaller GWs. They will give us an advantage because we can't actually "see" Black holes, or dark matter, and GWs from them can provide us data to understand them more...

[@adityajoshi617]

This is an absolutely beautiful and well explained video

[@lazeppelini123]

so studying space is basically studying stone in the jelly :P

[@larrymuana2260]

Awesome illustration and explanation!! Thank you

[@nischaldhungana7014]

So wait doesn't the light travel in space-time? why doesn't it get stretched and compressed as other things that are part of space time?

[@RJBenish]

Excellent question. I think you've hit on the "thinking error" that as yet afflicts the G-wave establishment. What makes the LIGO enterprise so suspicious is that they sometimes say, yes, the light wave gets stretched, too. But they never provide a coherent PICTURE of what they say happens. Hand-waving. Not gravitational waves.That's all they've got.

[@albertsharipov627]

It's because the gravitational wave moves relative to the light very slow. The light that gets strechted doesn't make the measurement, but the light, that follows the stretched light into the stretched space now has to travel a longer path. It's that light, that gets measured.

[@iceseic]

This is the answer i come up with. Ripple and distortion only happen when there's an object with a mass, and based on general relativity a light didn't have mass and only stored energy. So there you have it

[@dextermorgan6881]

I have this for my presentation tomorrow thanks

[@AndersonQueiroz_v]

They did it!

[@aditeayah]

This is one of the best video i have been so far

[@rodricksmith4284]

so are gravitaional waves 2d or 3d

[@qantj]

+Ahmad Yh 4D, 3 spacial and one time.

[@ethanJ496]

+qantj vulpis as long as you don't include quantum mechanics...

[@qantj]

illusiwind Pretty sure there isn't a quantum mechanical description for gravitational waves.

[@bboyHarrypotter]

+qantj vulpis Yes there is. One mathematically consistent description is string theory. ncatlab.org/nlab/show/string+theory+FAQ#RelationToGravity physics.stackexchange.com/questions/54317/in-what-limit-does-string-theory-reproduce-general-relativity

[@KooriGraywolf]

+Ahmad Yh They are 3D, the expand in all directions. But it is hard to visualize them this way, so it is easier to show the graphs in 2D.

[@LittleKooool]

There is so much about the universe that we don't know and there will be much we would not be able to know ever. The video proves how limited human mind is to understand the vagaries of this utterly complex universe. The fact that we are in awe with the detection of anything new, shows how little we know about the universe as yet and how much more we are to discover in future. This is why we should be humble enough to accept our limits and be skeptical of even the science, not just religion(which is obviously for the sheeples) and spirituality. To know that you don't know is the best thing you could know.

[@philgecko]

WHAT U HAVE TO SAY BOUT THIS, JESUS??

[@wille3573]

I can only speak for Catholicism, but this is great news. People seem to think we outright deny science when that cannot be further from the truth. The Pope himself said that religion and science can go hand in hand. For example, take evolution. We do not deny it, but instead see it as God working his way up through creation until he gets to his best creation: humans.

[@philgecko]

nah bible is the real deal, and it says 6 days. It also talks about a boat with unbelievable storage capacity... bible doesn't lie.

[@guccimane2226]

+phil d What a fucking idiot. This has nothing to do with religion you sick obssessive idiot fanatical atheist. Get a damn life. The greatest scientists were theists.

[@philgecko]

u jesus dude?

[@philgecko]

I feed everyone

[@bishoz67]

Thank you. I had a vague-ish idea - now I have a slightly less vague-ish idea. But I did learn something!

[@danstrike6687]

"There's not an actual force pulling the planets around [an orbit], just a bending of space." Um...

[@justagenosfan]

isn't it rather that the curvature creates a force

[@joelgrayson4648]

@@justagenosfan The curvature of spacetime creates acceleration and the illusion of a force. However, gravity is not a force (outside of classical physics).

[@sshreddderr9409]

bs, makes no logical sense. spacetime is a mathematical coordinate system. It's not a physical thing. When people say spacetime, they really just mean physical space. Space cannot bent, that makes no sense. That's just some mathematician confusing math objects with physical reality. Space is a void filled with a uniform super fluid that is infinitely compressible. This should be obvious given that wave behavior is an emergent property of pressure equilibrium being disturbed and pressure affecting the fluid in all directions equally. There is no way to overcome this argument alone. If I asked a physicist to explain why fluids produce waves and why waves have a sinusoidal shape, the answer would be that the motion is caused by the setup of what makes a fluid a fluid, meaning a sea of particles that have their own density and that seek pressure equilibrium. This is logical deduction. So by logical induction, if space can wave, it must itself be a medium maintaining pressure equilibrium, otherwise you are braking causality. And notice how this suddenly makes all of physics intuitive. and a field is just a mathematical model of a fluid, also not a physical thing. There is just a single force, which is the mediums pressure. Electromagnetism and gravity are just specific ways in which pressure can affect things. Energy conserves because the fluid has no resistance, and energy is just a quantity of fluid impulse. Electrical charge is also just mechanical fluid pressure. There are no point particles at all, and all of physics can be explained just with fluid mechanics. All that is needed is a fluid with the attributes I mentioned. Notice how this makes intuitive sense of many weird physics concepts. For example, the reason why global entropy in the universe increases is because the entire universe is trying to regain pressure equilibrium, and its coming closer to it over time. Energy has to be spread out evenly because it is just a moving pressure imbalance. A volume of space with more energy in it is denser on average than one with less energy, so it has to spread out to globally reduce pressure.

[@hongsu4868]

The cartoon explanation is very clear，thanks

[@AdiDavid10]

OMGW THEY HAVE BEEN DETECTED!

[@psibarpsi]

Did you really write "Oh My Gravitational Waves"? 😂

[@justagenosfan]

@@psibarpsi no he probably meant "Oh My Governor of Wyoming"

[@yannhugo6258]

Next month, views will have exploded in an exponentiel way! Congrats to the LIGO's team, and thank you for this nice video, very usefull :) And by the way, Bruce Allen from the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics in Hannover said, when he first saw the recording, he said "Oh! It's an injection, obviously!" haha!

[@Daniel-rk2qz]

ur like the only video i understood about this shit

[@bhaweshkumar7128]

Very nice and simple explanation.

[@Joshualalalala]

GRAVITATIONAL WAVE IS DETECTED!! :D :D

[@aorusaki]

Amazing video man!

[@forte2337]

Half Life 3 confirmed!!!!!!

[@justagenosfan]

yup

[@DecaixX]

This channel explain things better than Ted Ed But both are bice channels! Thank you for subtitles! Im from Argentina

[@bboyHarrypotter]

I love this video, but why does everybody have to use that damned ball on a stretched fabric/sheet analogy for gravity? The analogy itself is partly based on gravity!

[@chanakyasinha8046]

This is how their ugliness shows in making us understand, they just can't speak up the exact thing, i mean why you are putting analogy, you need the understand the science in purest form not analogous, how will the student apply it in real world with partial understanding., 😭

[@jahvongrey5663]

Hopefully this is one step closer to explaining Black Holes, that's the day I'm waiting for.

[@vaultdweller123]

still don't get it xD

[@Peterpan2355]

gravity waves pull everything to the centre of the Earth in precise manor that can be measured, yet it says space gets bent and distorted by gravity, I don't get it either.

[@bisconect]

Thank your for the intuitive graphical explanation!

[@siamrafsan8391]

gravitational wave is real

[@ZarlockGE]

All I know about gravitational waves, I learned from this video.

[@gamerfiend11]

Science is truth... Sorry religion, you had me for a while, I've finally seen the light..

[@amthegame0089]

+james butler poor soul

[@amthegame0089]

+james butler Remember the same guy that proposed gravitational waves years back once said "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind"

[@judinkinds8307]

+amthegame00 i'd rather be lame then

[@harimahmed2260]

Religion and Science are intertwined

[@comptino621]

Religion is failed science.

[@rahulsangwan9542]

What a description...thank you!

[@marcoros90]

Great Video! Simple and efficient! Which software do you use to create this kind of videos? Thank you!

[@anjalisharmapusa299]

Thank you. It was very accurate, easy to understand and complete.

[@andreysantiago]

Thanks for the explanation!

[@hddsaaeethjkugdddfjkkgd]

I really love your videos, unfortunately i'm Italian and I don't understand english too much, can you add subtitles in your other videos?

[@lukasevans5706]

Great video!!! very well done!

[@IMarkeybhoyI]

Great explanation

[@Alchemist_171]

Excellent video. Thank you.

[@faisalalkhedhrawi7311]

this is brilliant

[@rnidess]

Superb explanation!! Thanks.

[@sb-hf7tw]

2:20 smart data analysis technique Use of STATISTICS here too in LIGO, wowwwww!!!!!! Great video 👍👍👍👌 🙏👁️‍🗨️💬

[@etienneleroux6253]

Probably no simple answer to this question but - when you say the distance, however minuscule, changes.. whether it's compressed or extended.. what is extending/compressing? are you saying that the molecules/atoms that make everything up actually move apart / come together when one of these waves pass by?

[@nathandines22]

Well explained!

[@devyanijoshi5265]

Thank you so much! this was very useful!

[@khalidal-javid4263]

The best awesome thing simply explained.keep up.

[@nicolaerodideal9718]

Hey guys. I have a question here. As the theory states, if there's matter at the center, which causes all corps to move around that matter, and it seems like they're attracted to it, What is the reason that those corps seem to spin around forever and never lose energy ?

[@Norman_Peterson]

I finally understand. Fortunately there are those who explains things in a way suitable for ignorant like me. THANK YOU!!!

[@bobinikoloff8110]

Awesome video .. keep the good work .. I subbed ! ;)

[@yiradidudu419]

Great video! What is the theme of the soundtrack? and the author? Congratulations. Thanks

[@aztecemerald6514]

Thank You! I sorta got it before but not enough that I could explain it to someone else. Now, I think I can. Nice Job Dude! :D :)

[@tvrteja8837]

absolutely well explained, thanks a lot yaar...

[@ronc2010]

Can't wait to hear about the new discoveries this new method of measurement can bring us. Bravo! And long live Science!

[@gnadig665]

Great! When can I pre-order your " Gravitational Waves for Dummies" book?

[@arthurbrant]

Loved this video!

[@andredeliz2983]

This is monumental.... Does anyone know if this in someway correlates with parallel universes?

[@ronz91]

awesome video! thank you!

[@adrianaslund8605]

Are gravitational waves their own thing that travel through space? Or are they more like pertuberances on whatever the universe is made of linked only indirectly to it's source? Like the ripples that might radiate out of where a rock hit the surface of water in a pond.

[@sshreddderr9409]

the universe is a fluid medium. Light and gravity waves are just 3 dimensional pressure waves inside that medium. There is only one force, which is pressure. An easy way to logically prove this is that wave behavior is an emergent property of a fluid which every physicists would agree with if he bothered to think about it, so by logical induction, the fact that space can wave means that space is a fluid medium, the same fluid medium that light waves travel through, which is why gravity affects light. Of course, this also means that electromagnetism can affect an objects weight, the issue is just the scale. Another way to drive this home is that unlike shown in textbooks, magnetic fields look like toroidal flow fields consisting of two polor vortices which form the toroidal field shape. The vortices are golden ratio spirals, which can be seen under a ferrocell, but this is generally neglected. The golden ratio is the answer to how sunflowers can achieve the highest seed density. It's the solution to ideal compression of equally shaped seeds. So the magnetic field showing this spiral is proof that space has to be a uniform medium.

[@borrow0987]

It's a pity that there's no Russian subtitles, so I can't show this video for my friends who don't speak English. But it's even worse that I can't create my own subtitles to it, like I can do on "Kurzgesagt - In a Nutshell" and make the video availiable no-English Russians. But the video's awesome, explains a lot. Thank you! :)

[@ahmadis4]

What about if we are talking about planets on a different level than the source of the waves, how does it work if they are at different levels?

[@jeevanix]

Please explain it in 3D model. If you want to create such depressions in 3D model, space needs to be sucked up continuously or permanently.

[@shubhashish5788]

I have a question , Imagine a large stable body present nearby 2 colliding black holes , the gravitational wave present near the BHs will be very high before the collision, and it will cause the body to suffer space distortion causing it's distance from the BH to decrease and increase with a frequency . Keeping in mind the large masses also do distrot thr own space time fabric massively . Can we say that due to the gravitational wave of a high strength , it will react with this body's own distortion and at the moment the distance decrease it will pull it with such a high force that everything near by will ultimately collapse into the BH even before the two have collided ,and effectively increasing the collision speed of BHs .

[@JayQuiambao]

Thanks! I now SOMEWHAT understand why this discovery is such a big deal.

[@shantanukene4596]

I read an answer which states that earth would explode into many pieces if it loses its gravity.. If acc to this video gravity is not necessarily the force which pulls things towards itself then what exactly is the force called that is keeping the earth from exploding apart?

[@Relaxoxoo]

"It is not permitted to the Sun to catch up the Moon, nor can the Night outstrip the Day: Each (just) swims along in (its own) orbit (according to Law). (The Noble Quran, 36:40)"

[@hoffy1973]

great video. Thank you.

[@Viper550ful]

Well they are detected! Exciting news. 11 February news conferences in BOTH Italy and the US.

[@douglashagan65]

The distortion ripple effect is off by two degrees need to read adjust the disc from the rotor in order to centralize the ripple effect in the fabric of the universe this enables me to get through the dark matterhole which gets me into about 50 parsecs into the next galaxy

[@lucasbarreira2957]

what I don't understand is that space is stretched and compressed but it is just one part , what about time ? like when gravitational waves pass through does time also vibrates ?

[@ThomasKundera]

Actually space-time does.

[@md.saifulislamfaisal6546]

very well explained, thanks alot .. :)

[@rushiljohar4206]

I'm fascinated.

[@greghawkins1025]

The Gravity has Gone & Grabbed me & Gripped me Greatly & its Groovy!!!

[@unvergebeneid]

Is it really more difficult to tell when a very long tunnel changes in length compared to a short one? Of course you might get more noise in the data but I would expect the fundamental difficulty to depend on the length difference you try to detect in relation to the wavelength of the light you're using, not in relation to the length of the tunnel the light goes through.

[@CptSukumoki]

+Penny Lane The change in frequency of light is proportional to the total distortion of the space the light has to go through, aka: Δρ∝Δf Where ρ is the spacetime density and f is the frequency of light. (This isn't exactly how it works, but it's an easy way to think about it.)

[@unvergebeneid]

Ali As Oh, you are right. That's something that I in principle knew already. I somehow didn't connect the dots. Thanks!

[@ahmadaudi7340]

the best explanation :) thank you