Habermas on Modernity & Postmodernity (1984)

  Рет қаралды 12,550

Philosophy Overdose

Philosophy Overdose

Күн бұрын

Jürgen Habermas gives the first lecture in a series on the Philosophical Discourse of Modernity and Postmodernity. I added captions to try to make it a bit easier to follow. This talk was given at Cornell. More details will be added at a later date.
00:00 Talk
51:57 Q&A
#Philosophy #Habermas #Hegel

Пікірлер: 12
@Philosophy_Overdose
@Philosophy_Overdose 2 жыл бұрын
Sorry for the re-upload, but the errors were driving me crazy and I wanted to fix them. I will be uploading more in this series.
@flavia56
@flavia56 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the effort and dedication! I love this channel!
@slavenpuric3803
@slavenpuric3803 2 жыл бұрын
"Philosophy Overdose", one question to you: Why your Channel was erased? The profound wealth of early videos, where they are now?
@goranmatic
@goranmatic 2 жыл бұрын
Absolutely brilliant - thanks so much!.. This is easily the best Habermas talk my colleagues and I have seen. One could argue that it offers a truly insightful perspective towards understanding the development of post/modernity as it relates to Hegel, the response of the 'Young Hegelians', and the subsequent works of Niche and Heidegger. Looking forward to your future uploads in this series -
@OOOHerraint
@OOOHerraint Жыл бұрын
Is he still alive?
@Alexander-mr7jq
@Alexander-mr7jq 7 ай бұрын
​​@@OOOHerraintyes and active! 😅
@jorgepalaco5983
@jorgepalaco5983 Жыл бұрын
So amazing, right now I have homework about him. So I gonna to watch this to learn more.
@JonSebastianF
@JonSebastianF 2 жыл бұрын
I spotted a few small errors: 39:17 “that” → “which” 41:04 “inner logic” → “the inner logic” 42:33 “flairing up” → “flaring-up” 42:52 “and neglected” → “and of neglected” 44:31 “to movers” → “to the movers”
@redpad79
@redpad79 11 ай бұрын
what the fukc is wrong with you
@fw2167
@fw2167 7 ай бұрын
At 15:10 you wrote "cultural substances" but it should say "cultural subsystems" instead. The paragraph relates to systems theory, in which science, morality and art each had their own "code" of validity. (That's why Habermas says that those questions were autonomously elaborated)
@jessegordon3891
@jessegordon3891 2 жыл бұрын
brilliant
@goodshortvideos9647
@goodshortvideos9647 11 ай бұрын
no, it's not that brilliant
Reconciling Subjectivity & Substance: Hegel's Critique of Pure Personhood
1:11:28
Rick Roderick on Habermas - The Fragile Dignity of Humanity [full length]
47:34
The Partially Examined Life
Рет қаралды 148 М.
СНЕЖКИ ЛЕТОМ?? #shorts
00:30
Паша Осадчий
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Неприятная Встреча На Мосту - Полярная звезда #shorts
00:59
Полярная звезда - Kuzey Yıldızı
Рет қаралды 2,2 МЛН
Greatest Philosophers In History | Søren Kierkegaard
21:51
Eternalised
Рет қаралды 141 М.
Arthur Schopenhauer's Philosophy - Bryan Magee & Frederick Copleston (1987)
43:28
The Ideas of Chomsky - Bryan Magee & Noam Chomsky (1977)
44:55
Philosophy Overdose
Рет қаралды 98 М.
Oxford Mathematician DESTROYS Atheism (15 Minute Brilliancy!)
16:24
Daily Dose Of Wisdom
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Do We Need Ethical Principles? Richard Rorty (1994)
1:24:14
Philosophy Overdose
Рет қаралды 50 М.
Modernity: An Analysis
25:37
Then & Now
Рет қаралды 59 М.
Hegel's Philosophy of History
43:11
Michael Sugrue
Рет қаралды 427 М.
Socrates' Trial: His Historic Defense in Today's Language
34:21
Legendary Lore
Рет қаралды 915 М.
Martin Heidegger: Being and Time
19:54
Epoch Philosophy
Рет қаралды 222 М.