Zen Master Seung Sahn (1927-2004) said that 'no mind' meant "...cutting your attachment to thinking," and cultivating a "...great don't-know." Then "...you see that you already have no-mind." This is basically the same idea as shikantaza. In your practice, don't try to attain some special state of mind; just sit.
@captinbdran20 Жыл бұрын
thank you for every thing , i am from Egypt and work as a therapist and you really really help me and my clients throw me , thank you for all videos i love you
@macmcmaster68922 жыл бұрын
Brad san Arigato, ne? I read all the wiki and internet definitions. I decided I needed the Hardcore Zen perspective of mushin. I had come to the conclusion that Shikantaza was close to the mark. We met in St Louis at the Missouri Zen Center, at the turn of the century, the trip your car broke down. Glad you are doing well. Mac
@ThePhoenixcompanies2 жыл бұрын
I used to raise cattle. Sometimes when I got into the pen to sort some of them from one pen to another, the next thing I realized I was done sorting. This left me contented.
@fireatwill81432 жыл бұрын
"Trying to express the inexpressible is a fools errand,... But I've never let that stop me". Jed McKenna 😊
@ayyadhammadipa95022 жыл бұрын
I always think that when Mahayana sutras use the word "no" as in the Heart Sutra or Zen teachings, it means "empty." Thus, no-mind = empty mind = mind that is completely non-separate from other phenomena and conditioned by them, mind that does not set up arbitrary boundaries. I agree with you, Brad, that it may be easy to experience that no-mind in shikantaza.
@JeffStorey-se6ox2 жыл бұрын
Those opening quotes made me think about Toaist principles I've read about like wu wei, the do without effort, kind of like the idea of flow
@odpaws2 жыл бұрын
Mushin , like Dao, to me isnt something that can be communicated in words spoken, written or thoughts because it's mushin. Non Buddhist documentation about mushin doesn't serve to transmit dharma as much as it serves to communicate it in words to non Buddhists. Ironically, in doing so, it obfuscates the concept. That's why koans exist. Saying the word silence isn't silence itself.
@jugsewell Жыл бұрын
The Sōtō school holds that shikantaza originated in China and was transmitted to the founder of Japanese Sōtō, Dōgen Kigen 道元希玄 (1200-1253), by his Chinese teacher Tiantong Rujing 天童如淨 (1163-1228). However, the term shikantaza does not appear in surviving Chinese documents, and most nonsectarian scholars now approach “simply sitting” as a Japanese innovation, based on Dōgen’s idiosyncratic understanding of the “silent illumination” (mozhao chan 默照禪) teachings he encountered in Song dynasty China. Robert Sharf University of California, Berkeley
@JimTempleman2 жыл бұрын
It seems clear to me that when Dogen instructs us, in the Fukanzazengi, to: “Stop the driving movement of mind, will, consciousness. Cease intellectual consideration through images, thoughts, and reflections.” He means it. And this seems tantamount to entering a state of no-mind (mushin) or at least no-thought. Yet most Soto practitioners appear to ‘pay no mind’ to this instruction. The Fukanzazengi states: “In general, a quiet room is good for practicing [za]zen, and food and drink are taken in moderation. Cast aside all involvements. Give the myriad things a rest. Do not think of good and bad. Do not consider right and wrong. Stop the driving movement of mind, will, consciousness. Cease intellectual consideration through images, thoughts, and reflections. Do not aim to become a buddha. How could [this] be connected with sitting or lying down?” - Dogen (2007) Shōbōgenzō: The True Dharma-Eye Treasury. Translated by Gudo Wafu Nishijima & Chodo Cross (2007) Appendix II Fukanzazengi (Universal Guide to the Standard Method of Zazen) Volume I. p. 364
@TukenNuken2 жыл бұрын
The issue with this instruction of "Stop the driving movement of mind" is that it might not be clear what exactly is meant by 'stopping', and it can be understood in exactly the wrong way. The key is not to force anything to stop, but to do the exact opposite and allow things to be, even what you might think of as the "movement of mind". It's important not to add fuel to the fire by trying to force your mind into some state. Deliberately forcing your mind to stop is precisely the "driving movement of mind".
@JimTempleman2 жыл бұрын
@@TukenNuken Yes! The point is to cease one’s attachment to the thoughts, “opening the hand of thought”, and letting go of them. The problem is that very few people know how to do this, and fall into the habit of watching the contents of their thoughts, which leads to entanglement. Hongzhi says in ‘The Acupuncture Needle of Zazen’: “Knowing without touching things, this knowledge is innately subtle. Illuminating without encountering opposition, this illumination is innately miraculous. - in Taigen Dan Leighton & Yi Wu (2000) Cultivating the Empty Field The book: Carl Bielefeldt (1988) “Dogen's Manuals of Zen Meditation” Gives Dogen’s earlier version of the Fukanzazengi which explains how to attain ‘no-thought’: “Do not think of any good or evil whatsoever. Whenever a thought occurs, be aware of it; as soon as you are aware of it, it will vanish. If you remain for a long period forgetful of objects, you will naturally become unified.” (I can vouch that it works, but there are a lot of subtleties that have to be attended to.) Better yet, his article: Carl Bielefeldt (I986) “Ch'ang-lu Tsung-tse's Tso-Ch'an I and the "Secret" of Zen Meditation” (which can be found on Google Scholar) It not only provides the source from which Dogen took those instructions, but it also suggests why Dogen (and others) changed them to something more impenetrable in later editions. The impenetrable version is: ‘Sitting immovably in the mountain-still state, “Think about this concrete state beyond thinking.” “How can the state beyond thinking be thought about?” “It is different from thinking.” which is found in most versions of the Shōbōgenzō, including the Nishijima & Cross translation.
@Rhobyn2 жыл бұрын
The instruction becomes clear(er) once you know/understand the five aggregates model and dependent origination.
@blackbird5634 Жыл бұрын
If you wish to find out more about how and when Zen Buddhism was made into a war-like philosophy in Japan read: "The Japanese Art Of War" by Thomas Cleary. He details the introduction of Buddhism to that country and how this simple, peaceful philosophy was co-opted by the Samurai Class into one focused on the martial arts.
@Veepee92 Жыл бұрын
To say "the samurai class" is a bit of an over-generalisation. Historically speaking it's true that the majority of the supporters of Zen Buddhism were samurai, but a majority of the samurai class had nothing to do with Zen, and there were good number of samurai who derided Zen as a fatalistic philosophy completely unsuitable for the warrior class. The idea of Zen as "the philosophy of the samurai class" was mostly established during the burgeoning nationalism of the late 19th century.
@blackbird5634 Жыл бұрын
@@Veepee92 Again I refer you to Cleary's work on the subject, he makes a much more refined explanation of the theory and the details agree with your assessment.
@altmilan2 жыл бұрын
In economics, there's a thing called Goodhart's law (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart%27s_law) that basically says that metrics cease to be useful once you make them into targets. Maybe something along those lines here too?
@tomnussbaumer2 жыл бұрын
Is it wrong to compare/relate Mushin to a flow state? Like when you become one with whatever you are doing in the moment? I'm quite lucky to get very often into a flow state when working (I'm a software developer) or when performing art and there is no real thinking going on for hours and hours, but the "work" somehow realizes itself ... (and is of higher quality as when I let my mind interfere).
@leetrask18842 жыл бұрын
A "flow state" came to my mind as well from the video. I spend most of my days programming as well. On a really good day, I can hit that flow state and the code just writes itself
@Rhobyn2 жыл бұрын
Takuan Soho is a Zen monk who is well known for his instructions specifically towards martial artists and feudal lords. He might be an example of more... politically involved temples. But he is pretty well known among people into Japanese martial arts. He was also sometimes (fictionally) depicted as a mentor to Musashi Miyamoto. I have some of his writing. Always seemed weird, instructing people on how to use Zen ideas for killing.
@altmilan2 жыл бұрын
Also see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Unfettered_Mind
@saralawlor7802 жыл бұрын
Always always good, thank you 👍
@CaptMang Жыл бұрын
I think of mushin as being in harmony with those things (emotions, ego, discursive thoughts, etc.), rather than being free of them... just letting them be as they are instead and being okay with that.
@fieldstalker24742 жыл бұрын
Do you have videos where you talk something about Joshu :D Its interesting to see what you understand from those koans because I can’t understand nothing
@guyolive10712 жыл бұрын
i was introduced to this concept as a kid from "Zen and the Martial Ats". Kime and Mushin. I found it to be a useful approach to life I still use to this day.
@bennigan882 жыл бұрын
"No Mind" always makes me think of that great training scene in The Last Samurai. Tom Cruise sure got enlightened quick in that one.
@Yeti_Boop Жыл бұрын
He got so enlightened he became a better swordsman in like a month than people trained in it since early childhood. Lol
@cyrilgcoombsiii2 жыл бұрын
love that shirt!
@paulengel49252 жыл бұрын
you should have a poetry contest to choose your successor
@paulsagerman51112 жыл бұрын
The Mushin 'mind-set' may fit well for certain action-oriented situations. Such as waiting to strike the Dokusan bell.
@Spudcore5 ай бұрын
It may not be useful, but it sure sounds profound! :D
@joeg39502 жыл бұрын
Nice acoustic intro! I’ve read a few of DT Suzuki’s books. Like you, I admire his scholarship and knowledge. However, with much scholarly writing, it may not be the best place to increase one’s understanding of a concept that many find difficult on a good day. Shunryu Suzuki is accessible, but I caution a casual reader not to readily say that they understand his content. In the past few years, I’ve attended events where people claimed to completely understand someone’s work without having the honed tools necessary to have sound comprehension of an author’s text. This may sound a little snobby. However, if one does not practice with study and seek out a teacher’s aid, they will most likely go to down a wily path. All the best, Brad! Viva Ziggy!
@markbrad1232 жыл бұрын
Some other Buddhists also teach still Shamata to emptiness dependence because full on omnipresent sensory attention maybe disturbing or empathically suck. No expert on Nis , think he called that Para brahmin.
@juanduque712 жыл бұрын
Buzzcocks are/were the best
@4kassis2 жыл бұрын
OK, these quotes may be a bit wishiwashy, but Dogen has never struck anyone as clear and helpful, Not anyone who would search youtube or wikipedia for information anyways...
@bigd41572 жыл бұрын
Brad Sometimes you are spot on and other times you should just play the guitar.
@mattrkelly2 жыл бұрын
yeah... it might be easier to practice zen if you are not such an intellectual...