Sec 122 communication during marriage

[@VikashKumar-yt4wj]

best lecture on law subject on KZbin ❤

[@rinkysingh5162]

Your teaching style is amazing sir jiii

[@VikashKumar-yt4wj]

keep making videos sir and i assure u that one day ur videos are going to viral among law students

[@mandeepkaurmahi0762]

Thnku so much respected sir❤🙌

[@chhavibhatt5848]

Hello, sir! The video ended abruptly and the MC Verghese case did not get complete. Otherwise great lecture, thank you!!

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

Sorry for that

[@chiranjitagogoi8660]

sir i m preparing for assam judicial...hopefully i will succeed thnkq so much for such an exceptional explanation ....n selfless contribution 😊😊

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

Welcome g

[@My_lyf99]

Sir lecture incomplete h 🙁🙁🙁

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

No I think it's complete and covered all aspects of this section

[@My_lyf99]

@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 Okay sir ...I might be wrong 😔

[@LovePreet-xd5eu]

Awsn teaching

[@shashiipriya4913]

Last point you were saying was missed out from the video kindly put those points in the comment box

[@VikashKumar-yt4wj]

sir small suggestion for u., sir actually I saw ur video on 1.5 speed and still understood it clearly. only I want to say u ur videos are lengthy and viewers some time see for little bit short video. suppose u upload 40 min video then by editing and and increasing the speed u can upload and the video will be of 30 minute containing the same content. by doing this u will be able to attract more viewers

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

Thank you g

[@ProPakistani-r4t]

Zabardast

[@My_lyf99]

Thanku so much sir ...🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

[@jayshreegaydhani829]

Thanks sir 🙏

[@PoojaGupta-nq3wj]

Thnku sir😊

[@pritysingh7931]

Thank u sir🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@lawkanya]

Sir ek doubt h. Jo Exception 5 apne bataya ki proof of communication by third person can be testified by third person(16:30) Toh yaha h yeh HEARSAY EVIDENCE nhi hogi kya?

[@sanjeevverma9789]

👌👌👌

[@soumensikder3392]

Sir case law's whatever you says all are important for West Bengal judiciary ? I mean except this case law's any case law need no know

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

Plz subscribe the SCC OR RCR, AND READ IT PROPERLY, IT WILL HELP U TO GET UR DOUBTS CLEAR,

[@soumensikder3392]

Ok sir thank you

[@hemanttiwari5140]

Sir yu provide pan drive course...and hw I get yur compit lature series

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

I never charged for my vedios, it's totally free for those who has ambition in their life to become a judge, so dear it's free and i don't saved the vedios in my laptop after uploading on KZbin

[@sonybhat7528]

sir last m case nhi ho paya , can you expain that in refrence to defamation TJ Ponnen v. Verghese

[@hemanttiwari5140]

How it is cost

[@ananyasingh3937]

Sir, can if the wife tells about this communication to her friend then that friend can go and give evidence in the court? Will it be acceptable?

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

He may but relevancy is almost nil

[@abhirajparab9961]

Sir it looks like video is incomplete

[@prashantkumarsoni7459]

🙏💗

[@AdityaMishra-kd6gr]

🙏🙏🙏

[@s.k4051]

🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@lawcraze1021]

Sir g 6 mint pe jo 2nd and 3rd exception hai plez uski koi example bta dyen wo samjh nai a rahi .

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

The exception section 122 clearly states that the privilege cannot be claimed in certain situations, such as where one spouse is subject to prosecution for crimes committed against the other or against the children of the couple. This was in furtherance of upholding the principle of public interest and maintaining the sanctity of social institutions in the society. The idea behind such a concept is that state would intervene in the bedrooms of its citizens if it believes that privacy is being replaced by abuse and exploitation. In Fatima v. Emperor16 Mrs. Fatima was convicted of murder of her stepson. The session court had admitted the evidence of her confession to her husband on the ground that the alleged murder was Abdullah’s (her husband) son and therefore an offence was committed against him.

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

The exception section 122 clearly states that the privilege cannot be claimed in certain situations, such as where one spouse is subject to prosecution for crimes committed against the other or against the children of the couple. This was in furtherance of upholding the principle of public interest and maintaining the sanctity of social institutions in the society. The idea behind such a concept is that state would intervene in the bedrooms of its citizens if it believes that privacy is being replaced by abuse and exploitation. In Fatima v. Emperor16 Mrs. Fatima was convicted of murder of her stepson. The session court had admitted the evidence of her confession to her husband on the ground that the alleged murder was Abdullah’s (her husband) son and therefore an offence was committed against him.

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

The Indian Evidence Act which applies to both civil and criminal law, finds its application to the Domestic Violence Act also and since it discusses about a matrimonial offence, the protection of privilege under section 122 would not be applicable in such cases of matrimonial offences against the husband.

[@mritunjaykumarmisra2360]

Tumne ek baar pucha, sir ne 3 baar btaya, kitne kind hai humare sir❤❤❤❤❤

[@ujjwalkirti1082]

Sir what if any 3rd person reveals the communication which he had heard when couples were communicating privately without the knowledge that the 3rd person was present there?

[@HarpreetKaur-bl5ks]

In this lecture sir said that if third person heard it is admissible in evidence. Bcoz sec 122 protects the individual and not communication

[@lawcraze1021]

Good Morning sir g 17 mint pe jo during marriage C nay communication suni husband wife ki uski had tak wo hearsay evidence hogi?

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

Extra judicial confession /admission overhead by c

[@lawcraze1021]

@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 thankx sir g

[@lawcraze1021]

@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 Sir ek point or bta dyen ye extrajudicial confession or admission hai kekin jab c court mein aye ga to uski evidence to hearsay evidence kahin gay?

[@harpreetsinghkahlon2827]

Extra judicial confession is in the nature of hearsay but has a evidentiary value in court