Has This Archaeologist FOUND The Tower of Babel?

[@MarcelinhoTheRock]

Dr. Douglas Petrovich It's incredible

[@IlluminingThePath]

Thank you, Marcel.

[@MarcelinhoTheRock]

@@IlluminingThePath thanks a lot, doctor, i wish that Someday you arrive in Brazil to lecture in archeology, i hope your books get translated to portuguese to The Glory of The Lord.

[@IlluminingThePath]

@@MarcelinhoTheRock You are welcome, Marcelinho. I would love to come to Brazil to speak about my discoveries. Hopefully a Christian group there will invite me some day. I also would love for my books to be translated into Portuguese. Yours for the King, Prof. P

[@MarcelinhoTheRock]

@@IlluminingThePath i emailed you Doctor, thanks in advance.

[@rotaryenginepete]

Archeologist Joel Kramer already found it

[@IlluminingThePath]

What Joel Kramer evidently does not understand is that the Babel of Genesis 10 and 11 is not and CANNOT be the same site as the Babylon of Daniel's day. This is archaeologically impossible when you identify the proper outward movement of people just after the confusion of language at Babel, which is the only way to identify the original Babel. You can read all about this when my book is in print. Daniel's Babylon was not an occupied site at the time. Cheers!

[@Shivey-Caroline-7-23]

Very interesting, thanks for sharing'

[@OnASeasideMission]

What? Someone found archaeological remains I the Middle East??? That's bloody amazing. GIGO Genesis in, Genesis out.

[@bookofrevelation4924]

Could Job have been Jobab, son of Joktan, and have been Melchi-Tzedik? That would make the Divisions made during Tower of Babel even more interesting in reuniting properly through the Holy Spirit today.

[@itmaster3805]

the timing is about right

[@WeTheLittlePeople]

No way the Temple of Eridu is the Tower of Babel. He can't account for how the language dispersed from the location or the event that caused it.

[@Caseydog3]

So what about the Tower of Babel exactly???????????????

[@itmaster3805]

He just showed very strong Scientific Archeological evidence that there was a dispersion of people groups from an area just like Genesis ch 11 said there was a dispersion. Gen ch 11 fills in the reason why.

[@arfermo853]

Hence racism and suspicion of those of another tongue

[@itmaster3805]

@@arfermo853 That is just human nature, we are, at heart, capable of much evil

[@arfermo853]

@@itmaster3805 what was Gods purpose at the tower of babel? And why did he do it . And what is the outcome today?

[@itmaster3805]

@@arfermo853 Gen 11 tells you why, you should read it. Modern Mankind has "rebuilt" that tower. Becoming more of one mind Rejecting our relationship to God Becoming wise in our own eyes Every thought of man was for evil Revelation ch 4 and the rest tells how God will tip mankinds "tower" over again

[@roblangsdorf8758]

It would be interesting to see a map showing the step by step spreading of the world's population from the tower of Babel over the first 1000 years after the flood.

[@marianolaferte6333]

The spread of the indo European peoples can give you some insight, although I believe it comes after what's mentioned in the video

[@chorgzent.3978]

LOVE DOUG ROCK

[@navion1946]

You can see the remnant of the Tower of Babel on google earth just a ways south Eridu. So yes he found it.

[@barefoot3662]

The tower of babel is in tybet there are 6 videos on this subject with evidence it was bult with red brick asphalted to gether it was bult on a plane that was seventeen thousand feet above see level it was toller then mount everest the chinees and the indeans still walk around it. Watch you tube video tower of babe found.

[@hglundahl]

No, he hasn't. The Zigggurat of Eridu is dated to 5000 BC, as I recall his content, and that date, is, according to my tables: 2182 BC 70.704 pmC, so dated 5032 BC By contrast the real beginning and ending dates of Babel are (Biblical and carbon, the former obviously the real ones, the latter useful for finding your way in archaeology), these: 2607 BC 43.438 pmC, so dated 9507 BC 2556 BC 51.761 pmC, so dated 8006 BC If you tell Doug Petrovich this, I think he can tell you what _other_ Archaeologist found the City of Babel in the 1980's ...

[@EYESWIDEOPEN00]

Who dated it, you? Im guessing not. Do you know if everything you have been told across the board is the truth? No you don't. Have we all been lied to before, and are we all still being lied to about everything today, yes we are, constantly. So that creates all sorts of problems

[@hglundahl]

@@EYESWIDEOPEN00 _"Who dated it, you? Im guessing not."_ I have done these RE-dates. My method is, take a Biblical event (or otherwise historical with good chronology) with a carbon date attached, check the discrepancy or the kind of extra years the carbon date involves (the instant "age"), calculate the carbon 14 level in the atmosphere back then, you get a thin grid of dates, then fill in intermediate probable carbon levels for intermediate real years, then calculate carbon dates for those years too, and now you have a more dense grid. You are BASICALLY asking me to distrust my own work, because I don't know the guy who did it ... duh!

[@hglundahl]

@@EYESWIDEOPEN00 One more thing. Before you ask me how I knew what carbon levels went with what age implications, there actually are carbon 14 calculators online. I use them.

[@itmaster3805]

It would be very interesting to see his response.

[@endooi5476]

@@hglundahl Carbon dating is nonsense, completely unscientific and based on a lot of assumptions.

[@hglundahl]

0:49 Late Uruk expansion ... What about Europe even to Spain and Ireland getting people from the Neolithic Anatolia, which has a cross-over with Mesopotamia?

[@kennethswenson6214]

Have you found The Tower of Babel (specifically and precisely)? No. Have you found a civilization that "could" have produced a Tower, yes. Another problem the "Uruk Period" is just on the knife edge time period for when the world was Created, assuming the Two thousand and twenty-four years that have transpired in the CE. The Uruk period (c. 4000 to 3100 BC; also known as Protoliterate period) existed from the protohistoric Chalcolithic to Early Bronze Age period in the history of Mesopotamia, after the Ubaid period and before the Jemdet Nasr period. So not enough time would have passed from Creation to have The Flood, the "Ice Age", and The Tower of Babel.

[@EYESWIDEOPEN00]

You haven't worked out one of the main reasons why the US invaded Iraq yet im guessing. You didn't hear about a certain city being found in Iraq either? Or a certain Tomb of a king being found, just prior to the invasion? Did you at least hear about the Iraq museum being cleaned out of most of its artefacts? Clay tablets with the earliest story written called the Epic of Gilgamesh and so on? Yeah so all that is in Iraq, including Uruk

[@kennethswenson6214]

@EYESWIDEOPEN00 First, thanks as always for the extra knowledge and clarification. The "dispute" is not whether or not the Uruk "existed" or even if they, in fact, constructed The Tower of Babel. The "problem" is that the Uruk civilization existed at or around the time of the 4000 BCE Creation. There just is simply not enough time to say that Uruk is true, and the Creation, Flood, Ice Age, and Babel all happened before 1 CE.

[@jjones2582]

@@kennethswenson6214 - Were did the Uruk timeline come from? Last I checked we didn't have any verifiable calendar date beyond about 2300 BCE?

[@rons4297]

So there was no written language pre-flood? Ya right

[@2l84me8]

No. We understand how language changes over time and it didn’t happen because humans were getting along so well that a fearful god had to deliberately interfere with them.

[@thomaslorenz_eu]

You have to look closer to the source, not at the outflow of the rivers. Upper Mesopotamia, not Lower Mesopotamia which is so incredibly low that a tower could not even with the greatest fantasy reach heaven ... (34 meters above sea level).

[@sjl197]

Given that around the time that Mesopotamia was flourishing, the civilisation in the Yangtze of eastern China was independently advanced with unique pottery and weapons, while on the other side of the globe entirely, the peoples of northern southamerica had already formed advanced novel agriculture and construction. Given those, I’m gonna suggest that the Tower of Babel might be just a bit inaccurate.

[@customsongmaker]

Perhaps your timeline is inaccurate. The first alphabet arose in Canaan; whether it was Phonecian or Hebrew, it was based on Egyptian characters. But the Mayans also had a phonetic alphabet. If it is discovered that the Mayan alphabet shares a common origin with Phoenician, would you reconsider your position?

[@KenJackson_US]

@@customsongmaker This archeologist, Dr.Petrovich, has made the strong case that the oldest alphabet is Hebrew. There were several stone carvings in Egypt with Egyptian hieroglyphs that have been know about for over a century but which no one could decipher. He demonstrated decisively that they were indeed paleo Hebrew!

[@customsongmaker]

@@KenJackson_US That's correct. And Moses himself is the most likely person to have developed the first alphabet, since he was one of the few privileged in Egypt who learned to read and write. He also went to Canaan, and before that to the wilderness where the proto-Hebrew has been discovered. And the Israelites were the first population who had need of widespread literacy, and in fact were commanded to read and write.

[@KenJackson_US]

@@customsongmaker Moses certainly used it to write the Pentateuch. But I think Dr.Petrovich showed the subject matter of some carvings probably is about and by the sons of Joseph. I wonder if the idea of a character-per-consonant wasn't given to Joseph in a dream.

[@customsongmaker]

@@KenJackson_US That is also possible, and it would be exciting to find examples of it in Egypt.

[@chrisanderson9157]

You mean the Washington Monument don't you?

[@boxelder9167]

Perfect comment! 👍

[@Kysushanz]

Where is the tower???!

[@itmaster3805]

it fell

[@boxelder9167]

In front of the reflective pool in DC.

[@itmaster3805]

@@boxelder9167 good symbolism

[@MysteriousTony]

So.....the answer is no?

[@stsplmb]

Always

[@CiscoWes]

Comment found below: @navion1946 6 days ago You can see the remnant of the Tower of Babel on google earth just a ways south Eridu. So yes he found it.

[@rons4297]

Word

[@kevinburke1325]

No, the answer is yes. He said they clearly found it in the video. Watch the video.

[@vivarussia753]

Answer no ! What was the question?

[@billcook4768]

So, no, he hasn’t found the Tower of Babel.

[@sjl197]

Wait, are you suggesting that the bible doesn’t unequivocally tell us exactly about all of human history? Huh.

[@porcine83]

@@sjl197 Has anyone ever suggested that? I believe the Bible is completely accurate in all that it records, but it doesn't purport to "tell us exactly about all of human history" only select parts. It contains a lot of history, including the beginning and a number of specific events along the way, but isn't a history book. You may not accept it as true, but misrepresenting it is intellectually dishonest.

[@jamesphillips3115]

It’s so easy to for the devil to fool people when you let others do what you should. Words have definition that bound meaning and the word tower in Genesis means pulpit. The people hated Gods authority which was Shem Noah’s second born had received. Shem is the word name or authority so the people built a pulpit and made their on shem or authority so they could do as they pleased against the Gods laws.

[@Mikemenn]

No. It's fictional.

[@HollyFrench-j9x]

❤

[@JustMe-mn5hk]

Wow that's just amazing! We've got beer and pottery! Proverbs 137:9 ... what an awesome loving God! You Swindle 6 million dollars out of Kentucky and this is all you got to show for it? Let me know when your amusement park goes bankrupt I need a good deal on some Lumber!

[@TJforChrist]

I saw something on this not too long ago. Looks like they've actually found it.

[@kirkhere2711]

Click bait. Just a pottery lesson.

[@johnmichaelson9173]

Ridiculous claim, smh.

[@toneloke7489]

Genesis is not history, it's mythology

[@debranewsome9853]

@@toneloke7489 ⬅️🤡

[@jagone5672]

These guys TALK AND TALK! WE KNOW THE TOWER OF BABEL IS I. THE AMERICAS!

[@jamjams690]

me being a facts person and a person using commonsense, they didn't build the tower of babel out of bricks, they used stone first in pre historic times, they didn't even know how to make bricks when Babel was built plus why not start this tower on a mountain, most of these think this so called tower is in Iraq in the middle of the desert with mountains surrounding it, Which make no sense at all

[@jagone5672]

Shows how little you know. Research geopolymores.

[@USAnatureandpeople]

People didn’t had built from the stones because they were so much more advanced

[@skydivingcomrade1648]

You were not there.....the oldest known book says it was bricks, not stones. You're given people who were not there not credit than the historical documents. The Bible is a historical document as well as poetry, other styles of writing.

[@gordon2945]

It makes perfect sense

[@porcine83]

They did know how to make bricks (virtually the same process as the pottery) and they didn't have stones in that area, or they might have used them.

[@brianwilson6950]

all nonsense fairy-tale