Haydn - Symphony n°98 - Berlin / Jochum

[@mihalisboufidis8998]

Nur Haydn konnte durch eine unerschöpfliche Quelle musikalischer Ideen und Inspirationen auf diese Weise mit Musik spielen. Danke, großer Meister! Ich verehre dich!

[@eporze]

E.Jochum,un Director injustamente olvidado.Linda interpretacio'n!.-

[@petermerelis]

I think this is my favorite Haydn symphony

[@notaire2]

Echt authentische Leistung dieser typisch haydnischen Sinfonie im angemesenen Tempo. Genialer Dirigent!

[@timmartalogu2282]

0000pppp

[@eporze]

Agrego,despue's de escuchaRLA TODA,excelente INTERPRETACIO'N!!!!!!!!!!.-

[@mikewashington9018]

haydn the true father of the symphony and quartet.god bless him

[@elaineblackhurst1509]

Paternity mismatch x2.

[@matthewzisi300]

Neat to hear the harpsichord playing with the orchestra!

[@sheldonbazinga3985]

Écoutez cette maîtrise, cette science, ce goût exquis... Vous avez bien compris? Alors plus question pour un quelconque chef d'orchestre à l'avenir, de diriger autrement... Même Monsieur Antonini qui confond Haydn et Vivaldi...

[@mikewashington9018]

haydn the true father of the symphony and quartet.god bless him

[@elaineblackhurst1509]

Unfortunately for your little story, there is as much evidence for the existence of a ‘Father of the Symphony’ - ditto ‘...String Quartet’ - as there is for Father Christmas.

[@johnkusske7535]

He's the father of the piano trio too!

[@elaineblackhurst1509]

@@johnkusske7535 …and neither is he the father of the piano trio.

[@johnkusske7535]

@@elaineblackhurst1509 Yes, he was the father of all three. Even though others may have written primitive examples of them, Haydn was the one who gave them life.

[@elaineblackhurst1509]

@@johnkusske7535 A father by definition has to be involved at the *conception,* but by the time Haydn wrote his first symphony in 1757, the symphony was already a teenager of about 17 which means that unless you suspend the universally accepted meaning of the word father, your point is untenable. I’ll just about accept ‘father *to* the symphony’ or ‘foster/step-father…and the like. Just one example will suffice (though there are many more): Johann Stamitz who died in 1757, did so having written about 60 modern Classical symphonies for the fantastic Mannheim orchestra, many in four movements, some with clarinets. Many of these symphonies are fine works, as are those of Holzbauer, Richter, Fils, Wagenseil, Monn, Sammartini, et al. Describing the works of the early symphonists as ‘primitive’ is unfortunate; the work of the Mannheim symphonists was famed throughout Europe, and their new techniques spread around the continent and were hugely influential. Haydn’s contribution to the *development* of the symphony in the second half of the 18th century is greater than any other single figure excepting only Mozart’s last six symphonies, but ‘father’ is a complete nonsense unless you ignore just about every known fact about the birth of the Classical symphony from c.1740. In short, I actually agree with your basic point, just not the use of the word ‘father’.