"HE KNOWS THE TRUTH!" Pros Analyze ILLEGAL Strike (Usyk vs Dubois)

New Angle of Low Blow - Now we can I Identify the placement of Usyk's Belly Button, confirm if his cup was hit and confirm if the Strike was Illegal or Legal. Joe Cortez, Shawn Porter, Carl Froch, and Johnny Nelson Analyse if the low blow was illegal.
Oleksandr Usyk is a Ukrainian boxer. He won an Olympic gold medal in 2012 and dominated the cruiserweight division. His agility and technical skills stand out. Usyk's move to heavyweight boxing has also attracted a lot of attention.
🥊More Boxing Breakdowns:
• Let's End The Debate! ...
Usyk vs Dubois - Was it a Low Blow? • Frame by Frame Analysi...
Usyk vs Dubois, Fight Breakdown • PROOF! FAKE LOW BLOW U...
Canelo Alvarez vs Jermell Charlo Breakdown • Alvarez vs Charlo: A T...
Timestamp:
0:00 Usyk's Promoter (Krasyuk)
0:13 Joe Cortez (Ref)
0:47 Shawn Porter
2:15 Carl Froch
2:59 Joshua vs Usyk 2
3:21 Luis Pabon Favoritism
3:40 Johnny Nelson
#Usyk #UsykDubois #UsykLowBlow #boxing

[@Shawnjames21]

I stand corrected

[@ClaimerUncut]

A man of integrity 💪 no shame in falling for the optical illusion

[@Shawnjames21]

@@ClaimerUncut damn man.. I really liked usyk. Never thought he would stoop so low to win on a technicality and fallacy.

[@AD-lu8vm]

It was an illegal punch that landed on Usyk's bladder area. Dubois hit Usyk with 20 low blows. Please go and watch the latest video posted on Fight Film showing all of Dubois illegal punches

[@ClaimerUncut]

@@AD-lu8vm The bladder is located beneath the Navel, just above the prostate. My video cannot be refuted I'm afraid, unless at this point you choose to be willfully ignorant.

[@TheGreatest_Ali]

I'm actually surprised to see someone admit they're wrong, good on you Bro

[@stevierico5934]

We know it was a low blow and that Usyk won the fight, why are people on KZbin still going on about it and telling us things we already know? 🤔

[@ClaimerUncut]

Me: Shows an angle proving it's a legal strike, and professional ref stating it was legal. You: we know it was a lowblow. The world true has gone full 🤡

[@killingheros3554]

Because the white guy beat up the black guy...again, that's why.

[@Dpw20001]

​@@ClaimerUncutthere's other refs saying its illegal. Everyone has their bias even refs

[@awabbelghith2885]

You want to convince me you have to show all the angles not just the one that looks legal

[@ClaimerUncut]

Nah mate, get over yourself.. I don't need to convince YOU. And your last words already prove your convinced anyway, but feel free to be willfully ignorant.

[@awabbelghith2885]

@@ClaimerUncut 😂😂😂🤦🏽‍♂️

[@awabbelghith2885]

@@ClaimerUncut 😂😂😂🤦🏽‍♂️

[@ClaimerUncut]

@@awabbelghith2885 confirmed NPC

[@DarkXavia]

Lol Bro you have 🧠issues, who talks like this?

[@Silius-yz6kw]

actually, one more thing I noticed about this particular angle. pro legal activists see it as damning proof of a scoring shot however if you actually look carefully you can see Usyk's navel from this viewpoint. Even post impact you can still see the fleshy top of it pressed between his trunks. Far from muddying the waters it actually turns out to be a cut-and-dry below-the-belt shot the ref correctly ruled. Case closed, Usyk was hit below the navel and this is the best angle to prove it.

[@JamVamDam]

2:14 Carl Froch is the definition of Bitter lol

[@smoorbb]

aye don’t wana bother you but why did the gta IV videos stop u waiting for a Revive update ?

[@ClaimerUncut]

Hey Khal, long time 😁 I'm actually moving my gaming videos to a new channel where I'll jump back on GTA 4 related content, including finishing the game. I'll share a post with a link to the channel when ready, Apologies for all the boxing content!

[@MytonSteel]

This music is Banging 😆🤣 It was unequivocally a Legal Strike and you know why? Because I can see it with my own eyes! Edit: This video is actually quality man, you should have more views

[@z388z]

I found another angle from Usyk's left hand side that's different from the other one from the left, it's more from behind Usyk. Want me to send it to you?

[@ClaimerUncut]

Good man 🫡 yeah send it through (timestamp or whatever's easier) Honestly I think this video puts a cap on it, however I will make more shorts & Tik toks 🤮 related to the topic

[@z388z]

@@ClaimerUncut I posted it to you on X. I'm not sure which frame it corresponds to from the other angles though as I don't have the original video and the person that posted the picture is not responding.

[@ClaimerUncut]

@@z388z Appreciated man, it's probably an angle they showed post fight commentator show, but ppff.. it's clear as day. I still have people in denial in the comments.

[@child_of_Orion]

Froch is realy stupid the Marquess of Quensberry Rules states "Boxers are prohibited from hitting below the belt", but how about if you raise your belt higher which some intentionally do, others unintentionally and in any way, the shorts can't stay static during a fight. So no - this wasn't a low blow, but a legit KO to the glass body of the Ukrainian cheater. He was in a state in which he was unable to beat the count. One other thing: at the time of the punch you CAN'T see Usyk's navel. And in any way, the rule say "below" is illegal, so ON means it's legal. Another great video, bravo!

[@ClaimerUncut]

It's clear to anyone investigating the strike with no agenda, that the strike was NOT a low blow. Additionally Usyk stated "my 🥜🥜" 3 times, so if we atleast know it didn't land in his 🥜 Then we know he lied. Meaning he is a man of no integrity. Appreciate the acknowledgement COO. This channel aims to call out all BS in the boxing and MMA landscape, that way.. It ensures I only encourage subscribers who share the same values as myself. Hopefully we can eventually be a big YT player and take on all who are a detriment to our society!

[@child_of_Orion]

@@ClaimerUncut exactly. Plus, saying the punch lifted the protector is utterly stupid - even if it did, it doesn't mean it'll hurt your groin. Plus, it is not a low blow anyway.

[@ClaimerUncut]

If you were a *STRONG BELIEVER* that the strike was illegal, let me know your thoughts after watching this video. 🥊 LIKE, SUBCRIBE, & SHARE (to friends) Timestamp: 0:00 Usyk's Promoter (Krasyuk) 0:13 Joe Cortez (Ref) 0:47 Shawn Porter 2:15 Carl Froch 2:59 Joshua vs Usyk 2 3:21 Luis Pabon Favoritism 3:40 Johnny Nelson

[@DwayneDaniels101]

From the first video I saw the comments you were recieving, I likened it to you being Blade, and fighting for the humans vs the Vampires. Most people are si*k in the head.

[@FindingTheTruthMinistry]

It was a low blow

[@ClaimerUncut]

You know what you're doing.

[@homeofthecarters]

The initial first contact was low

[@ClaimerUncut]

@@homeofthecarters oh yeah..

[@iamaced479]

I wish Dubois would be more vocal himself about this, closed mouths don’t get fed in this business, we all know why Usyk is silent as he is waiting for the accusations to disappear

[@ClaimerUncut]

I'm guessing he's leaving it with Frank Warren's lawyers to put a case together. The likelyhood is their appeal gets ignored if they're not able to cover the points in this video (including the Joshua fight). The Ref actually puts his hand on his heart out of sympathy for Usyk both fights.

[@iamaced479]

If I was DDD I would be sharing your videos and tagging people to keep it in the publics eye, hopefully Frank has a good team behind him who can put in a good case The whole situation is a mess now especially since WBA have given the regular belt to Charr, I’m wondering if DDD would still be eligible for a rematch, the timing of that move was very suspicious

[@Bumbaclot213]

Why didn’t he raise his voice after the shot in the ring?

[@ClaimerUncut]

@@Bumbaclot213 probably better questions to ask no? He did raise his voice after the fight. What's your point?

[@Silius-yz6kw]

He knew it was a foul. You can hear the cup being hit both from ringside(ask Barry Jones) and in the ESPN version of the fight(kzbin.info/www/bejne/iaGWYYGnndKDfrs). That's probably why he didn't protest the ruling or look the least bit perturbed or outraged as if he was really robbed. His management fed him some bs after the fact and like a company man he regurgitates it.

[@brokenbikeframe]

The only optical illusion is the one shown repeatedly in this video 🤣. You give me the right camera angle and I’ll prove ghosts are real too.

[@ClaimerUncut]

There's a newer video, keep up the same level of sarcasm on that one.

[@brokenbikeframe]

@@ClaimerUncut I mean I’m not being sarcastic but okay 😘

[@oldschoolsaint]

Please provide the source link to the video appearing here. Also, please note that arguments from the opinions of so called authorities is a logical fallacy. Lots of those “experts” are clueless.

[@ClaimerUncut]

Source link, You mean the fight? I've already said previously in your video where you responded by blowing a kiss. You can download the full fight and after Round 5, this replay shows. However.. you can see within THIS video Usyk falls to the ground 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️ Lastly let's not "strawman", You were appealing to authority earlier no? Thoughts?

[@oldschoolsaint]

@@ClaimerUncut that would make me a hypocrite, not a maker of straw men. Please cite my appeal to authority. I’ll look for the clip in question and get back to you. My review of the side and front shots from the video of the broadcast are different than yours. You still think you elbow vs naval analysis is valid?

[@antoniotorcoli5740]

The fight took place under the WAB rules and regulations. Oddly enough ,they do not define a low blow, and they do not recognise the definition of any other organizations. The determination of a low blow is entirely left to the referee discretion.

[@cnwil4594]

That makes sense. I have tried to explain this to casuals.

[@BernhardBernard]

They absolutely do. It says in the WBA rule book that an imaginary line across the navel is belt line

[@pavelhristov562]

Buddy when you are standing and leaning forward the distance between chests and bellybutton are different way more shorten its so simple to get it

[@ClaimerUncut]

Buddy.. Surface level thinking.. You're providing the obvious. Now consider the distance between a stiff belt and the chest? Consider how much he's actually leaning in this clip? Critical thinking.

[@Silius-yz6kw]

It still isn't a scoring shot. Reality remains the same. 2:44 is right when the punch hits the cup(the same spot as seen in 0:22 in the first video from a different angle) where the knuckles are clearly below the waistline. You highlight the moment the punch traveled up the cup and to the waist. You can clearly hear the cup being hit(no amount of video can refute this) and you can pinpoint the exact moment the glove makes contact which is not only below the navel but on the cup.

[@ClaimerUncut]

The glove hits the cup at 2:44. Is this something you're willing to swear on your family for? I'd suggest you watch again, and stop with the nonsense.

[@orestmakar8562]

AJ second fight against Usyk was dirty. Low blows and multiple single and double handed headlocks and illegal upercut atempts were definatelly part of the game plan. As AJ was cought by the ref atempting headlocks and missed his illegal upercuts he was allowed to get away with a low blow upercut due to the ref being possitioned incorrectly. You do not accidentally keep hitting below the belt line. In a way i like seing overhyped boxers desperatelly trying to beat the smaller, shorter man with a shorter reach with everything legal and illegal they can at him and he always comes out on top.

[@ClaimerUncut]

"I like to see overhyped boxers desperately trying to beat the smaller boxer" you're not about truth mate. You're a fanboy, who as I said in my previous response likes to manipulate truth. I say this based on YOUR WORDS. You've gotta be better than this.

[@orestmakar8562]

@@ClaimerUncut In what way do i manipulate „the truth”?. You have your opinion i have mine. I can disagree with your opinion and i can point out where in my opinion you are wrong. Daniel lost the fight in every possible way on every possible level by any metric. Thats a fact and statistics prove it. Daniel landed many unquestionable low blows called by the ref and the comentators. People initially focused on this one low blow as if it existed in isolation. So many low blows thrown by Daniel mean that he was intentionally throwing low blows that later on could be „debated online” irrespective of how they were ruled. If he accidentally hit low once or twice he would try to hit abouve the belt, but he didn’t. Almost every body punch by Dubois was deliberatly low. He did not care about getting a two point penalty because he was loosing on points anyway. He landed half the punches Usysk did. As i have mentioned in my previouse comment (to some other person) to which you responded an argument to authority is an informal logical phalasy. An argument from authority is when someone uses an authority's words and not their reasoning to justify an argument. That person said that you are corect on your assesment of „how indirect lighting works” and accused people that disagreed with you n this point that „they do not know how indirect lighting works”. He did not explain why your argument on lighting is valid and said it is valid because „he knows more about how lighting world” he is a the figure of authority he based his argument on. Bronging up famous people that share your opinion as „evidence” of it being „the truth”, is not evidence and does not prove your argument or make it truth. Reasoning does. It is a very common form of manipulation (argument to authority). Lastly the thing you quoted me saying was ment as a hooking stab at the people that defend raw power over skill and do not give credit where credit is due. In every fight Usyk was underestimated for being not too small, too light, too short, with a shitrer each and yet most „big ans strong” „Goliaths” „Barbarians” „Behemoths”, „Demigods” have to resort to cheep fouls to have a chance at winning. I also find it funny that people defend a fighter that was defeated in every possible way by every possible metric and hang his claim to victory on one of his many low blows…

[@orestmakar8562]

@@ClaimerUncut I am about puting forth my opinion that is different to your opinion in this particular fight. Opinion are like assholes. Everybody has one. 😉 The point of having a discution is to exchange said opinions and see who has better arguments to atampt to get closest to „the truth”. When i said that „i like to see overhyped boxers desperatelly trying to beat the smaller boxer” i ment it as a joke. If you have been following HW discutions you know that modern boxing praises and dogmatically beleieves that „big and strong” is all you need in boxing. Thers an interview with Crawford where an interviewer claims that he could beat Terence -becaue he is physically bigger. I disagree with such expertiese and i like to see their world crimble when big and strong failes to live up to the hipe. I do think that bigger guys are usually overhypes for the sole reason of their physical size. I find it borderline cringe when some experts talk about these „big and strong guys”.

[@ClaimerUncut]

@@orestmakar8562 Yes. Everyone has opinions. However some are rooted in logic where one person offers data, for others to Refuted. There comes a point where if someone confirms that 2+2=4 your opinion of "well I think it equals 5" is invalid. You would have to refute the data. My video shows the punch landing above his Navel, on the belt line. 2+2=4. "well I think it's illegal" is your opinion. Ofcourse conveniently your statement was a joke. If only statements can be so easily detracted by saying "I was only joking". You said what you said, and it exposed the motives in your "opinion". Let's agree to disagree.. Behind closed doors you can self evaluate and be better.

[@denalmazov8278]

​@@ClaimerUncut, stop creating a false sense of certainty by using phrases such as "2+2=4". While "2+2=4" is an absolute mathematical truth, you are using it to give the impression that other, more subjective claims or arguments are equally certain and indisputable, even when they are not. also, I see how you often accuse someone of the "straw man fallacy". However, by saying phrases such as "They claim that 2+2=5, but we all know that's not true," even if the opponent never made such an assertion you are using the Straw Man argument

[@grattanvaz1614]

Definitely alive blow

[@ClaimerUncut]

2+2=4 Definitely = 5

[@saulwest8254]

its pretty clear the whole glove was not above the belly button, I feel this debate about the "low blow" has overshadowed a great performance from Usyk. Really can't wait to see how Fury deals with a fighter who is more skilled than himself.

[@ClaimerUncut]

Trajectory of the strike? Padding of gloves? The video showcasing the anatomy location? Making decisions out of bias doesn't help society.

[@z388z]

First of all, the ABC/EBU/BBBofC rules all state that the belt line is defined as the arbitrary line drawn across the body from the top of the hip bones, not the belly button. Second, as the ref Jack Reiss explained on the DAZN Boxing Show, a shot only becomes illegal if the knuckle-part of the glove is fully below the belt line, that is, shots on the belt line are legal.

[@BernhardBernard]

@@z388z and the WBA rules clearly state an imaginary line across the navel is belt line 🤷

[@saulwest8254]

@@z388z WBA rules "It is critical to know that the waistline is defined as the imaginary horizontal line through the navel to the top of the hips. This is so regardless of where the boxer places his trunks and or protector cup. The Referee should establish the waistline at centre ring in his final instructions." "Any blow that lands below the established waistline is a foul."

[@ClaimerUncut]

Did the referee establish the waistline centre ring?

[@eddielee9212]

Wow even stronger angles now. I now going from 'murky' to 'legal shot'. Well from 'low-blow' to 'murky' to 'legal shot'. The biggest piece is the ref never defines 'what is a low-blow' at fight start, I mean that's just calling it murky from the get go. Great video and edits!

[@BillyDaHustler]

Yeah man, the strike even proves it didn't graze the cup

[@windhunter7590]

Another video that doesn’t understand anatomy. When the back curves and hips turn upward and inward, the distance between the nipples, and belly button decreases. The entire punch at full impact landed below the belly button. ask any figure drawing master, to analyze it for you.

[@ClaimerUncut]

Aah Yes, the figure drawer. Ever heard of Camberwell college of Arts? I drew live anatomy for 4 years. If you think by any measure the entire punch landed belw the belly button, you're not who you say you are. Keep holding on to your lies mate.

[@BernhardBernard]

@@ClaimerUncut yeah, but you've never had your nuts pinched in a protector so you drawing naked people means nothing. 🤣... "Uhh, I went to college for art, I know anatomy" well my lady is a nurse and she does too... She also seen it below the navel

[@sarahX..]

Claimer Uncut said: "Hey Sarah, appreciate the effort and you dedication to the argument, however you've posted a video clip of Usyk after he's laid on the ground, stood up and his corner haven't repositioned his shorts, Secondly, that wouldn't even matter. The video further proves that when he bends forward, his shorts don't move, however his belly button goes under right?" My response: When did Usyk`s corner ever adjust his shorts? I never see any adjustment by the corner throughout the fight... did you? Did anyone? Why are you once again assuming things with no evidence? In my brief video below(yes rushed and amateurish/inexperienced but yet straight to the point showing much better real to life examples) i firstly show the position of Usyk`s tattoo on his back in relation to the top of his shorts. As we can see in the first image of my video a comparison between just before the low blow and just before the ref commences the fight after Usyk got up in round 5. Any difference in the height of his shorts? I think not. In fact Usyk`s shorts stay pretty much the same height throughout the fight. Usyk`s navel will appear in and out of view during the fight(which i have already shown) depending on his body position/movement . His navel is always directly in-line with the top of his protector. My first video from the other day shows this very clearly. I think we can move on from this point. In your latest video here you continue to make assumptions based on Usyk`s elbow position during the low blow. You can make as many diagrams and estimate areas as much you like to suit your argument and assume as much as you like it does not change anything. The elbow example is a *very much* flawed explanation as Usyk`s body position is irregular twisted or contorted. Try getting your body in the same position as Usyk in this instance, look in the mirror, and you will easily see how a slight tilt to the side at the shoulder (especially if accompanied by any kind of bending of the legs or hips) will in fact (especially at certain angles) make the elbow appear closer to the navel than it typically would be. Whilst you continue to assume where Usyk`s `junk` is situated. Your examples are simply off. In the 2nd image of my video i show a shot of Usyk with Chisora after the fight wearing his protector gear *with out* his shorts. Now i want everyone to take a good long close look at this. Firstly notice the exact location/height of his cup in relation to his navel? From the top of the cup to his navel there is not much distance is there. Secondly notice how the cup protrudes? We can see this by the top angle it is not flush. It sticks outward somewhat. The main point i am making here - consider the trajectory of Dubois upper cut, as the cup is indeed sticking out a bit, there is more chance of Dubois glove coming in contact. Even if it merely clips the top of the cup (where it is protruding) Usyk would have really felt it in his lower area (at the very least sending shock waves) which explains his initial reaction and any contact here is 100% deemed a low blow! In the next image on my video we can actually see the cup through his white somewhat transparent shorts. Notice the blue and yellow? In particular the yellow shows up the most - which i have circled in the following image(from almost the same instance in the fight) and we can see Usyk`s navel as well. Now compare this to the previous image with Chisora. Things start to look much clearer now. . No need for any diagrams(even if it is fancy/eye candy) or assumptions, we can now definitely get a more accurate bearing on where the cup protector really is located during the low blow. Lastly notice the final image in my video, captured from this very same Claimer Uncut video here at 2:47 We can see Dubois glove clearly making contact with Usyk`s shorts. In fact his glove clearly looks to be somewhat *embedded* in the shorts at this point(right?) Claimer Uncut is claiming Dubois shot first comes in contact at a higher point. Considering all i have explained and presented this simply makes no sense! It is just not the case! Now have a good look at this final image again where Usyk`s band and shorts are. This shot is definitely *bellow* the navel at this point of first contact and i also assert here that Dubois glove has indeed come into contact with the top of Usyk`s cup. As all my prior evidence shows to be the most likely case considering the true position of everything and including the cup is somewhat protruding. Along with Usyk`s initial reaction very- indicative of being hit in the very sensitive area down low. Bottom line - do we listen to cherry picked opinions from a referee ex-boxer or commentator(also remembering it goes both ways there are plenty of high profiles stating the exact opposite) Do we accept mere assumptions made with diagrams or contorted image examples? Or do we wisely go with damning accurate presentations from *real time* footage and images showing how things really are. Again - the punch is always clearly just below the navel and also looks to have almost certainly come in contact with Usyk`s cup! The rest is history. Here is my video with the accurate real time images as i explained above. kzbin.info/www/bejne/bmG0ZZRmoLijfqM

[@z388z]

You are the biggest weirdo on here, still pretending to be a girl. No one is reading your essays.

[@JamVamDam]

Woah this is a long message! the problem is he has this video kzbin.infohykr-x45eJE which shows in slow motion that on your video 1:02 where you say the belly button is, it is a shadow which in his words "appears and dissapears" and his video shows it does, that cannot be denied. I get what you're trying to argue though. That his belly button isn't as far down as he is saying, but from the new angle we see the exact moment the punch lands which you do not show at all. When the punch lands, he is leaning into his shorts which means his shorts move up. On your video at 1:02 look at the position of Usyks chest. On his video look how far up Usyk's shorts are when Dubois lands? You cannot ignore when the strike lands, focusing on Usyk's belly button when he is standing tall isn't really a strong argument.

[@sarahX..]

@@JamVamDam But i clearly demonstrate where Usyk`s navel is in my first video. kzbin.info/www/bejne/paqtZ2Svl7KhgtE And that his shorts at no time have moved position. Only Usyk himself changes position. If you also check my description of this first video i am the one who first talks about Usyk`s navel *coming in and out of view* in relation to the way he moves / his position. I go into this in great detail. No one else has really mentioned it. This was where i assert usyk`s navel is always basically in line with his band sometimes slightly above sometimes slightly below. Nowhere near as low as Claimer Uncut suggests. Same with the cup. The evidence i provide, everything i explain, in both my videos add up to us being able to more accurately assess where Usyk`s navel is and where his cup is at the point of impact using basic logic and common sense determined from real time footage/images.

[@sarahX..]

@@JamVamDam I see there is also some mix up. I will elaborate to clear it up. In Claimer Uncut`s short video where he shows Froch explaining the location of Usyk`s "belly button" Froch does not state we can see the belly button during this point of impact. In fact Froch simply states the same as myself and others. That Usyk`s "belly button" *can be seen at times during the fight* Claimer Uncut is the one assuming (again) that Froch is saying we see Usyk`s belly button during the point of impact. This is not the case! As i explained already - during the punch, sure, this may very well be some kind of shadow effect or w/e. It doesn`t make any difference to anything! At this point and time Usyk`s belly button is obviously very slightly obscured by the top of his band/protector by a matter of millimeters in relation to his slightly bent position at that time. Again - Froch, not myself, ever state the belly button can be seen during the punch. Whilst during this exact moment say if Usyk were to stand straight we would actually see his belly button. Exactly as we see in my first video footage from just after the blow where he walks upright around the ring, not in any boxing stance, where it typically gets slightly obscured from view.. No shadow effects there. It is plain to see as i have circled his belly button with red. This is also where Claimer Uncut assumes Usyk`s shorts must have changed position and his corner repositioning his shorts etc - which is just guessing and of course we never see anything of the sort. The first image in my 2nd video clearly demonstrates Usyk`s shorts have not changed from before/after the low blow in accordance to his back tattoo location. When ever we se Usyk`s back his tattoo is always the same distance from his band. Strongly indicating the front of his band is also always in line with his belly button(as i have clearly shown) Again - Usyk`s shorts are basically always in the same position which we can quite easily notice throughout the fight.

[@sarahX..]

Moreover the ref was already aware of Dubois hitting Usyk low. Usyk complained several times. I can also show footage/images where we clearly see a couple of Dubois punches(whilst less forceful than the punch in question) hitting Usyk around the groin area on the side of his cup. So after the punch in question, seeing the way Usyk reacts, which is VERY indicative of a low blow or a blow to the cup, the ref THIS TIME simply signals a low blow. Which under all the circumstances is correct. He should have taken points from Dubois but no doubt he would have taken points if there was further indication of another low blow. Dubois is lucky in this respect. The ref gives Dubois a warning and gives Usyk time to recover whilst Dubois had plenty of time to rest too which also needs to be taken into account. As the fight commences Dubois is in a much better position as he is not the one recovering from anything the way Usyk is at this point. Lost `momentum` he says ? Bullocks! He should have capitalized on the situation but what do we see instead? We see Usyk further dominate Dubois even more than before, even after such a blow, and then stop him with a jab of all things. Dubois takes yet another knee. 99% outclassed from start to finish! Meanwhile any attempt to appeal is futile - nothing will ever change. It is the ref`s discretion. The WBA have revised and concluded. I think the best way to deal with this whole situation, so we can just move on, is to meet in the middle just agree that it was borderline and correctly up to the ref`s discretion. It`s done with and nothing will change.

[@Dpw20001]

Clearly low🙄

[@ClaimerUncut]

2+2=5

[@DarkXavia]

I can't believe your comment section man, seems you've upset alot of Usyk fans who refuse to accept their man is a dirty liar.

[@munecoalsuelo]

Great Video, also mix politics whit boxing is disgusting like its happend in this match.

[@ClaimerUncut]

Sadly you'll Find fans only watch boxing for political, nationalistic or racial bias, and that Inturn pushes narratives which ruin the sport. Currently Ukrainian fans who subscribed to my channel when I supported Lomachenko, are showing their true colours, not caring for integrity, but just the man (Usyk) who comes from their own country. They don't care how that effects Daniel Dubois.

[@marnicbros8002]

Both the AJ and Dubois fights. Usyk has no moral compass making signs to God like that.

[@ClaimerUncut]

I'm not even religious, and I wouldn't use God's name in vein

[@BernhardBernard]

😅. GTFO... Y'all are children talking like that

[@AD-lu8vm]

Lol. I would trust Usyk more than Frank Warren and Don Charles. Frank Warren is a proven liar. Don Charles😂 You should try to find out what "Don Charles" real name is. Dubois has a low IQ and will do anything asked by his coach and promoter

[@BillyDaHustler]

Yoo! he faked the groin shot with AJ Too? 🤣 don't care if someone is from my country or share culture, I'm calling them out for their BS

[@FightFanatico]

Most people of all races and cultures are sheep

[@ClaimerUncut]

It's a pigeon brain mentality, the majority of the world sadly.

[@AD-lu8vm]

Anthony Joshua's lowblow was half a glove lower than Dubois's and a clear illegal punch. Even Eddie and Joshua accepted it to be a lowblow and Joshua fanboys didn't start crying about it until now

[@BillyDaHustler]

@@AD-lu8vm Yeah accept the video is slowed down, and we can see it's a legal punch. It's right infront of your eyes.. in slow motion...

[@martinnbafiba1]

Fury had Otto Wallin Joshua had Ruiz Jr Usyk had Debois One punch is all it takes in the heavyweight division. Nobody should be underestimated

[@BernhardBernard]

Thought there was gonna be a breakdown of the 20+ foul line shots also? 🤔 If i got hit low all night and had a chance to do the same thing I would have flooped too... And so would anyone questioning his integrity...

[@ClaimerUncut]

You really need to look up the definition of strawmanning.

[@BernhardBernard]

​@@ClaimerUncutyou literally said you had a video in the works on it... To me... Were you just lying?

[@ClaimerUncut]

You just did it again

[@BernhardBernard]

​@@ClaimerUncutdid you delete my comment directing people into a video proving there were over 20 low blows? That's hilarious 😅

[@ClaimerUncut]

@@BernhardBernard and you did it AGAIN. that's not how life works Bro. You don't ignore the premise of a video or what someone said to you beforehand. I said to look up the term strawman not to ridicule you, but to give you a chance to learn something which can improve your communication. I'll accept you won't change, and simply say.. I don't delete comments. If you spam, or share links (which I've allowed) youtube will sometimes block you. The fact you're sharing a link to refute this video, yet couldn't refute it in your first comment further proves my point on your agenda.

[@Watcherw1]

At the endof the day, all this is to protect usyk from whatever loss may have occurred. It wasn't low, the guy went down, he milked it. You saw aj how he looked at usyk, he knew he hurt him, the problem was momentum, you cant be 100% for 36 minutes, thats why these calls are so crucial

[@ClaimerUncut]

💯 My comment section on every video is insane.. Anyone with an eastern European name are writing essays skirting around the truth. Why they feel the need to defend a man they don't know.. I don't know. But it's borderline insanity.

[@marcusvail6813]

Is it a coincidence that both low blow claims the ref was in both fights?

[@AD-lu8vm]

Is it a coincidence that both Dubois and Joshua hit Usyk with a hard lowblow in the 5th round? That's when Usyk starts to take over the fight and his opponents begin to tire out. Both time he was hit intentionally but the punch was disguised to look accidental. Don Charles came up with his dirty game plan after watching Joshua-Usyk 2

[@marcusvail6813]

@@AD-lu8vm both time. Stfu u clearly don’t know what u talking about.

[@soleknight3212]

@@AD-lu8vm Yeh, they trained all camp to "get lucky" with a low blow fake body shot

[@davewibberley6912]

No just proves he is the only ref that does his job properly ,,

[@DarkXavia]

@@davewibberley6912 Did you watch the video Bro, You still think it was a low blow?

[@mr.pooland2951]

Innocent refs missing out important parts of their jobs and the over exaggeration and misreading of the rules. If someone can please show me where the mention of naval is mentioned in any rules of boxing!

[@npcprototype4831]

0:20 Straight on the stomach, no debate. Get ready for the essays from Usyk defenders again

[@marcusvail6813]

Dude had the belt over his belly button. That shot was clean. The winner is supposed to be a top tier fighter for the heavyweight division with antics like this. Corny

[@grandtommyauto7564]

Lol so many people owe you an apology, but they won't.

[@DrakeyWayne]

Cowards

[@Silius-yz6kw]

One more thing as an aside. Joshua clearly hit Usyk low in that clip(I believe it was in round 5 of their second fight) the British commentators thought Usyk was faking it but they admitted after seeing the replay that it was indeed south of the border(Joshua's glove hit the yellow a clear as day hip shot). Usyk should have worn his Ukrainian trunks at the Dubois fight. 80% of Dubois's glove was on the shorts which would have been the yellow on the Ukrainian trunks. Joshua hit Usyk low so many times in that second fight, some of it accidental(round 11 for instance was a case of his punch being deflected off of Usyk's elbow guard) and some of it was intenntial such as in round 5 and round 10 after Usyk ate Joshua's right hand flush on the chin. And there's also a good video of Dubois hitting Usyk low over 20 times. Usyk doesn't fake low blows, he didn't fake a low blow when Joshua hit him with a mean body shot in round 9 of their second fight or even in round 9 of their first fight(the only instance Usyk initiated a clinch in that fight). He complains when the shots hit the cup or the hip.

[@child_of_Orion]

Usyk fakes low blow and it's a proven fact during his amateur career, as well as a pro. Poor apologist, but the fact is enough of the world saw the ugly Ukrainian propaganda that night and how vile Usyk and his team are.

[@Silius-yz6kw]

He didn't fake the low blow in round 5 of Joshua. Even the British commentators who initially thought it was legit backtracked and admitted it was low when they saw the replay. He also didn't fake a low blow when AJ legitimately hurt him with a body shot in rounds 9 of fight 1 and 2 respectively. Usyk doesn't fake low blows, he makes it known he was fouled so that illegal punches won't be counted as legal blows by the judges. Usyk never complained when Dubois legitimately hit him to the body a couple good ones in rounds 3 and 4 for instance, he did complain when Dubois hit him in the hip and the groin over 20 times.@@child_of_Orion

[@platonic7272]

Soft belly coming up with lame excuses..just admit you conned the referee..the rabbit 🐰 is a fake champion😂

[@ClaimerUncut]

One thing for sure, he's not a man of Integrity.

[@platonic7272]

True integrity is when you tell yourself the truth..but honesty is when you must tell others the truth..the rabbit 🐰 is just a liar...

[@danielstoned]

Why are you so hellbent on this?

[@marnicbros8002]

Strange question with no indication of your interest in the topic. It's in the title and the thumbnail.

[@ClaimerUncut]

It's an unresolved topic and I make youtube videos, if you watched the video, I don't think you'd be asking the question.

[@TheGreatest_Ali]

That's a bit much Bro, he's just trying to show different angles of the truth. Why you so mad?

[@vercingetorixwulf9298]

DD is the real world champion ...... fact .......

[@marcusvail6813]

He was definitely hurt. He dropped fast. That ref changed dobois entire fighting energy with all that stalling. I believe Dubois was cheated. That belt shot was legal.

[@ClaimerUncut]

"That ref changed dobois entire fighting energy with all that stalling" and sadly most follow the narrative that Dubois has no heart. I saw a man fighting two fights, plus having to start over after Round 5.

[@marcusvail6813]

@@ClaimerUncut exactly. There’s usually warning before calling shots low blows. I don’t follow neither fights but this fight was clear. Dobois would’ve fought harder after that if dude gotten up

[@papaguche]

How can you say the man has no hart when he was knocked down three times in a fight then come back to win@@ClaimerUncut

[@jopkins_yt]

What's crazy is I have "Dislikes" enabled and it seems there are alot of evil people who want to shut down the truth.

[@ClaimerUncut]

It's all good bro, dislikes help the channel too it counts as engagement. Let them be mad.