Liverpool fan here, and it's obviously Mourinho. Mourinho came in and did something pretty unbelievable in taking on Ferguson and Wenger and wiping the floor with them for a couple of seasons, then coming back after success abroad and winning it again. You don't have to denigrate Klopp and his legacy of finally winning Liverpool a PL, winning them a CL, 103 out of 105 points over 2 seasons (i.e. having one of the country's greatest ever teams for 18 months) ... all while taking on the might of Guardiola's oil juggernaut ... in order to give Mourinho his due. Mourinho is only definitively behind Pep and Fergie in the PL greatest ever list.
@Dan-cx4cp Жыл бұрын
Facts
@nelsonigwebuike9562 ай бұрын
Not a Liverpool fan
@BigSmokeMUFC Жыл бұрын
Mourinho no question
@eh9296 Жыл бұрын
Mourinho failed to break City's dominance while Klopp succeeded, smashed him every time when he was at Real, United, Spurs.
@EvieWillNotDie Жыл бұрын
@@eh9296false
@the0nlytrueprophet942 Жыл бұрын
@@eh9296He didn’t fail to beat United at their pomp though
@Kaijufied Жыл бұрын
I want to back Klopp here but you can’t argue with what Mourinho has done
@BigSmokeMUFC Жыл бұрын
@@Kaijufied innit
@kenllaney Жыл бұрын
mourinho has the greater legacy, its not just the trophies but the impact and story of his reign. But Klopp is a premier league great too imo
@brandonayong5823 Жыл бұрын
And rory made a killer argument. Mourinho dominated in the mid 2000s came back a decade later in a completely different PL with totally new players and managers and he still did the double in 2015 and also he gave united a European trophy which actually they don't have that many
@Blue_G707 Жыл бұрын
@@Chimera_zathat’s why klopp flopped with dortmund and bottled it 😂 meanwhile Jose did his bits at porto with lower budget back to back European cups & leagues came to prem and dominated klopp couldn’t do that 😂 then went to inter and won the only Italian treble with an aging squad 😂 come on then came back to England and won league and cup double now at Roma won their first European silverware in decades got cheated out on europa league final last year with bad refereeing also won 3 cups with united including a European trophy which klopp could never do because he’s being caressed like a little baby at Liverpool 😂
@joedonovan5875 Жыл бұрын
@@Blue_G707 Premier league legacy* A lot of your good points don't matter there
@owenynwa4eva203 Жыл бұрын
@@Blue_G707since when is wining the Bundesliga over perennial winners bayern a bottle job? Your just chatting sht
@liberalslayer7220 Жыл бұрын
The transfers of DARWIN NUÑEZ - £85.36M (BENFICA, 2022) VIRGIL VAN DIJK - £75M (SOUTHAMPTON, 2018) ALISSON BECKER - £65M (AS ROMA, 2018) DOMINIK SZOBOSZLAI - £60M (RB LEIPZIG, 2023) NABY KEITA - £52.75M (RB LEIPZIG, 2018) LUIS DIAZ - £50M (FC PORTO, 2021) DIOGO JOTA - £45M (WOLVERHAMPTON WANDERERS, 2020) come out at £433.11 million for 7 players so I guess you could be a little bit off the mark.
@kd5973 Жыл бұрын
It’s mourinho but Klopp had arguably one of the best teams ever for about 18 months. 103 points out of 105 at one point. Won the title earlier than any team ever (in terms of game week) and later than any team ever (in terms of calendar year) which is a strange record to hold lol but they were unstoppable for a time.
@solo2873 Жыл бұрын
Agreed, unfortunate for klopp that he has to go against this city reign.
@aidangriffiths5075 Жыл бұрын
Yea, but only one title. That will always come up against him in this debate, regardless of who they had to compete against
@hollowmatic Жыл бұрын
One title… nothing on Jose’s titles and unbeaten record
@liverbot4854 Жыл бұрын
But only one Premier League. He has to win another before being compared imo.
@exfx8315 Жыл бұрын
One of the best teams ever? It was a good team. Probably up there with the City team of 11/12. But not one of the best ever. They had Henderson and Wijnaldum in midfield haha.
@secla_SC Жыл бұрын
As a Liverpool fan, I have to be honest and say it has to be Mourinho. The man won three PL Titles across two stints and that's what gives him the edge. But don't get me wrong, its a close battle. Both he and Klopp have similar stories in that they both took average teams and turned them into Champions and won multiple trophies. Klopp having won virtually everything makes this debate a lot tighter than it otherwise would be. Klopp is an absolute Legend and lets not forget there is still time for him to win more.
@GIBBO4182 Жыл бұрын
Hate to say it…but it’s Mourinho. Klopp has the same number of titles as Claudio Ranieri
@eh9296 Жыл бұрын
As if Mourinho can end City's dominance
@mattvanemden7573 Жыл бұрын
Thats an extremely limited way to look at someone's managerial record when they have won every trophy available to a club side in the last 4-5 years lol.
@obongo96 Жыл бұрын
@@mattvanemden7573 mourinho did that and more. Won the treble with Inter milan and dominated europe back to back with porto
@GIBBO4182 Жыл бұрын
@@mattvanemden7573”premier league legacy” is the question mate
@obongo96 Жыл бұрын
@@eh9296 Won the treble
@siralexferguson4640 Жыл бұрын
Jose 3 times Klopp 1 time Respect respect respect
@bx1896 Жыл бұрын
Jose could outspent the opposition. Klopp can't.
@YeTism Жыл бұрын
@@bx1896Liverpool made a 100 million bid for Caicedo lol
@mezzala1014 Жыл бұрын
@@bx1896I guess Klopp is better than Pep then
@zinan2959 Жыл бұрын
Ah yess because Klopp didn't fork out big for Alisson and VVD Keita and Fabinho and others lol@@bx1896
@bx1896 Жыл бұрын
@@mezzala1014 same level
@Maj1794 Жыл бұрын
Lets not forget Chelseas mourinho broke Arsenal and man uniteds dominance.
@eh9296 Жыл бұрын
Pep's City is much better than those two teams
@Fernandez2023E Жыл бұрын
@@eh9296 no it's not
@path6336 Жыл бұрын
@@eh9296ur obviously a recent football fan. That chelsea team and united team was playing in a harder league.
@dangrifdhsbxjs8424 Жыл бұрын
@@eh9296why are you everywhere in this comment section glazing Klopp?
@roronozoro11 Жыл бұрын
arsenal never had a dominance over pl
@Nate-wh7or Жыл бұрын
Var is not the issue. Its literally still the officials. We all know for a fact more than likely officials bet on the matches through friends/families. They do it in boxing, nba, nfl so idk why we refuse to believe that the referees are still the issue as they always have been.
@sweenbean18 Жыл бұрын
you didn't contribute to the debate at all. Var is the issue full stop.
@Nate-wh7or Жыл бұрын
@@sweenbean18 var is not the issue at all lmao. It's like you guys complain about whatever you please. So when England scored that goal against Germany for instance that went over the line and wasn't awarded do we blame the ref or the lack of var? Other sports use var very well it's just this league.
@chris9964 Жыл бұрын
@@Nate-wh7or They even acknowledged that its the officials making the wrong calls with the "8 officials" comment yet still blame the tech 😂 They forget the VAR official only interjects when officials on the pitch have missed something or got something wrong to begin with, as annoying as it may be when a toe or shoulder is given offside. Yet whether on the pitch or in the VAR room, they're always protected when making the wrong calls week in week out.
@ashwilliams4959 Жыл бұрын
Var is obviously a problem when it keeps giving incorrect decisions but we can't go back because now the refs never get anything right. When refs try making a decision regardless of how small and unimportant, they always get it wrong
@gr0ve384 Жыл бұрын
How is better officials going to bring back the feeling that you get when you score a goal?
@samono7726 Жыл бұрын
Mourinho created a team that lasted 13 years on the platform of elites, and it was in his image that they dominated despite it being under several managers. For example, if you watched the team that won the 2012 UCL, it was like Mourinho was on the touch-line directing play.
@adenihunadewale9214 Жыл бұрын
Facts
@lewislibre Жыл бұрын
That’s a great call. The spine of that team he built stayed for 10 years
@Joe-d4s4x Жыл бұрын
Jose. Easy decision for me. You just have to look at the impact Jose had had on the English game. I put Pep, Ferguson, Jose and Wenger is a category of managers that have had the greatest impact.
@Irish-Gael-sg4lv Жыл бұрын
Sorry but Ferguson is in his own tier ahead of the others and it pains me to admit that
@Mcbikey24 Жыл бұрын
@@Irish-Gael-sg4lvnot ahead of Pep
@moulinyan Жыл бұрын
mourinho did what now?? got an unlimited transfer fund and played fantasy football???
@sandg507 Жыл бұрын
@@Mcbikey24lol good joke
@moulinyan Жыл бұрын
@@ishaanmurarka9082 yes fantasy football, when you can buy all the top players you like and buy the league, are you going to deny that?? klopp won the bundeslga with dortmund back to back, so dont need to hear what he did with porto, you probably started supporting chelsea when they got money now. what did he do with united and spurs??? get sacked?? keep your opiniong you're welcome to it.
@CarlosMartinez-eb5uv Жыл бұрын
In the premier League Klopp is a good manager, a chaser with few trophies. Mourinho is a Winner The headlines, the fuse, the entertainment, the karma and backlash from Jose and Trophies to back it up. Jose is up the ahead of Klopp as EPL greatest manger. no cap. Klopp managed to elevate Liverpool from their years of misery. Jose elevated the entire EPL
@thiagoteixeira6537 Жыл бұрын
Mourinho won it 3 times and Klopp won it once! If you ask me, that's end of discussion! What Klopp has done beating Guardiola by being basically perfect and his points tally in other seasons is extremely impressive, but Mourinho still edges it!
@advenco344 Жыл бұрын
Klopp got 97 points which is more than Mourinho ever got for Chelsea yet still didn’t win the league. That’s why it’s not fair to compare league titles won.
@mrlalalaelmo7454 Жыл бұрын
Klopp could have easily won 3 times, not to mention his team was never as well funded as mourinho’s title winning teams
@thiagoteixeira6537 Жыл бұрын
@@mrlalalaelmo7454 Coulda Woulda Shoulda, we can't bring that into it mate!
@dalewilsonii1945 Жыл бұрын
Mourinho never won a UCL with Chelsea though and Klopp has with Liverpool. That UCL gotta be worth a league title or two itself. Also taking into Mourinhos not so successful stints at United and Tottenham, it’s very close.
@Irish-Gael-sg4lv Жыл бұрын
By your silly logic: Roberto Di Mateo has a greater European legacy than Arsene Wenger because he won a UCL
@jhaych Жыл бұрын
Jose the multiple title winner
@bx1896 Жыл бұрын
How many did he win with Tottenham?
@ergertkurtaj8665 Жыл бұрын
@@bx1896could Klop win with spurs hell nah
@bx1896 Жыл бұрын
@@ergertkurtaj8665 he took over Liverpool without players like Kane, Son etc. Mourinho is no longer an elite manager.
@Irish-Gael-sg4lv Жыл бұрын
By your logic Jerzy Dudek has a greater European legacy than Buffon
@Stiggi71 Жыл бұрын
Mourinho never had to face a pep super team in the prem
@Shrewdy1 Жыл бұрын
Absolute state of this question. Jose has unquestionably achieved more rhan Klopp
@Young1Fendy Жыл бұрын
Argh yes as with the funds Jose has had Klopp could never achieve with same spending power 🤔
@parmaman8551 Жыл бұрын
So using that logic Ranieri must be the greatest premier league manager ever?@@Young1Fendy
@DJYunkHank Жыл бұрын
@@parmaman8551ranieris title win is more impressive than any of mourinhos.....
@ayaanlatif2296 Жыл бұрын
@@DJYunkHankand any of klopps then😂😂 Jose holds the record for 15 GOALS CONCEDED There’s a reason why it hasn’t been beaten yet
@russellward4624 Жыл бұрын
@@Young1FendyKlopp has spent 1b
@rikachu571 Жыл бұрын
By the same logic, if Ferguson's United didn't exist in 2006-09 Mourinho might have won 5 in a row. Klopp's legacy is that he was the best of the rest during Pep's era. Mourinho was THE man during his first stint in the PL.
@mehmetsheza1651 Жыл бұрын
Mourinho was well funded, he can get any player he wants. That is the difference with Klopp.
@sebenfc1982 Жыл бұрын
@@mehmetsheza1651 I don't know why people still believe this nonsense that Klopp isn't funded by his owners, forgetting that Klopp prefers training players over signing them. Klopp has never been a checkbook manager. If he were, he would have gone to a rich club like Madrid with unlimited resources. He chose Liverpool because he believes in FSG's philosophy of buying young and developing them. This is why he extended his contract not once, but twice with Liverpool. No one would extend their contract in a company if they feel their hands are tied. When Rodgers was sacked, two managers were favorites to be Liverpool manager: Klopp and Ancelotti. FSG chose Klopp over Ancelotti because Ancelotti told them Liverpool needed a new spine to be able to perform with the current squad. Klopp, on the other hand, said he was comfortable working with the current squad. This is why, in January, which was Klopp's first transfer window since he came mid-season, Klopp never bought a new player.
@matthewvaughan8192 Жыл бұрын
@@mehmetsheza1651 Not just that but he was up against a City team that may very well be proved to have been illegal
@matthewvaughan8192 Жыл бұрын
@@sebenfc1982 ''I would like to see us take a few more risks in the market. I'll say that much.'' -- Klopp, last year
@abubakrkhan110 Жыл бұрын
Akinfenwa is such a waffler man 😂😂
@VishwadeepShinde Жыл бұрын
If you actually listen to him and not lose focus, you'll understand he doesn't waffle. Maybe you need to have enough patience to listen to what others want to say. There are an abundance of impatient listeners already, watch the video again, you'll get it.
@RichardCranium694208 ай бұрын
@@VishwadeepShindenah he’s a waffler
@dalewilsonii1945 Жыл бұрын
Mourinhos Chelsea legacy is incredible, a shame that his time at United and Tottenham probably hurts how people look at him. Wish he never took those jobs
@rbstickymicky66 Жыл бұрын
He won a europa with utd and did a good job also did decent at spurs and that final he got them to… I guess we’ll never know
@dillsterscouseofficial Жыл бұрын
People forget this when saying he's better than klopp
@ashwilliams4959 Жыл бұрын
It's the same thing as city, when rules don't apply and you outspend all other teams 10fold then it's not respected. It's like a guy on steroids outfitting ordinary competitors, yeah surprise surprise he can lift but its not impressive
@spoots1234 Жыл бұрын
Mourinho has had a huge influence on the EPL. From the beginning at Chelsea, the 3rd title on his return, his media presence, his time at Utd and Tottenham - He's part of the furniture at this point and he'll likely be back again.
@unclebensrice4702 Жыл бұрын
The main problem with VAR is taking away the ability to just celebrate goals (They should remove it for offsides)
@aaronadams9625 Жыл бұрын
It’s quite funny when they use Lampards goals and assist forgetting he had a whole 3 season head start. It’s funny when you think about it because despite having that 3 year head start Gerrard wasn’t majorly far behind in goals and assists at the end of their careers. Gerrard is and was always the better midfielder.
@russellward4624 Жыл бұрын
Playing more years is a positive. Longevity is a talent.
@rbstickymicky66 Жыл бұрын
Gerard was miles behind when it came to goals haha man was dusty in his last year or so was getting pity minutes no chance if he had another 3 seasons he’d catch up. Lamps had like 5, 20 goal seasons I swear
@edwardoemiliano8018 Жыл бұрын
@@rbstickymicky66yeah try to go tackle people by your box and have tons of goals at the same time and tell me how easy is that Sherlock😂😂😂
@aaronadams9625 Жыл бұрын
@@rbstickymicky66according to the PL Website Lampard scored 57 goals more, that may seem like a lot but that’s 19 goals over 3 seasons which proves my point that Lampard starting his career before Gerrard gave him that advantage in the stats. No, he wasn’t dusty Brendan Rodgers played him in a more defensive position/role and at the same time was trying to get him out the team which evidently happened. Lampard majority of the time played in his best position. Gerrard was needed for many different roles and positions and of that he succeeded. Lampard wouldn’t have been able to do that. Will say though either way we were blessed to have seen these players.
@slimbobdiabolical1819 Жыл бұрын
@@rbstickymicky66 Gerrard played RB for an entire season. Then defensive midfield. And in contrast to what Rory said he scored most of his goals when he played in the great Benitez team. Had he played with that level of players for longer he'd have scored more.
@swannnny Жыл бұрын
I'm a liverpool fan, klopp may be the best manager in the league right now in terms of man management and player development etc, but as a serial winner, mourinho is one of the greatest managers of all time no debate, klopp hasn't won enough to be in mourinhos category
@colincolin5696 Жыл бұрын
Klopp done a better job arguably because of what he had compared to Jose but Jose definitely has a better legacy. How many records did he break?
@mbizza8135 Жыл бұрын
Apparently that 7-0 win is record breaking according to Liverpool fans maybe y its an argument in a first place
@bx1896 Жыл бұрын
Mourinho did so well in getting sacked. How often? 4 times?
@billyhoyle2780 Жыл бұрын
@@bx1896all managers get sacked, it’s part and parcel of the job.
@colincolin5696 Жыл бұрын
@@bx1896 what did he do in those years he was in charge tho?
@bx1896 Жыл бұрын
@@colincolin5696 for Tottenham? Nothing.
@joshuaheuvel7547 Жыл бұрын
Jose, and I hate to say it, but its definately Jose, Respect!
@steviewonder0850 Жыл бұрын
Winning trophies with Liverpool is not equal to winning it with Chelsea (especially when Mourinho was there), how many Chelsea managers have won major trophies? Ancelotti won the PL and FA Cup, Di Matteo won the CL(!) and FA Cup, Benitez won the EL, Conte won the PL and FA Cup, Sarri won the EL, Tuchel won the CL, etc. Sure Mourinho is the best manager Chelsea have had in the modern era but it's not just a case of 3x PL vs 1x PL, context matters.
@Anon97123 Жыл бұрын
And who started that? Who instilled that winning mentality in the players? Chelsea hadn't won a title for 50 years before Mourinho. First season 95 points, 15 goals conceded, 1 loss, retained the title, Cup double in the third season. Champions League semis in like all seasons. Then came back 10 years later and won the title in a different era. He's also the best post Fergie United manager. That club is broken. Coming 2nd with them and winning the Europa is as good as it gets with them.
@Stiggi71 Жыл бұрын
@@Anon97123tell me how many prems mourinho would have won if he had to face peps super team
@RuthlessMetalYT Жыл бұрын
I don't care about either Liverpool or Chelsea but I think it's Mourinho without a doubt. Mourinho is probably number four after Arsene Wenger, Pep Guardiola and Alex Ferguson. been watching PL since it started in the early 90's. So I can't talk about anything earlier than that.
@olavjorvik94 Жыл бұрын
Suarez, to me, is THE best 9 of all time. If we remove CR7 out of the equation, as he was RW, ST and LW at times. I rate him above Benz, Lewa, Kane, Zlatan, Shearer, Müller, R9, anyone. Prime Suarez between 2013 and 2018 was unstoppable. There’s a video on KZbin of all his Liverpool goals, it’s an absolute insane watch. Banger after banger. About 2 tap ins in total in the red shirt, rest was screamers and solo raids. Not to talk about his Barcelona run, and then to win the league first try with Atletico, when their lord and savour Griezmann went the other way and lost out. 2 golden boots, against Messi and Ronaldo. All the assists. My all time XI? He makes it in, every time.
@dogsbollocksgenius9480 Жыл бұрын
Better than R9? No chance
@olavjorvik94 Жыл бұрын
@@dogsbollocksgenius9480 by which statistics is R9 peak or entire career better? The stat of thinking back to the good old days? Suarez is close to having as many goals as Ronaldo had games. Add assists and he’s way beyond. Prime Ronaldo was unplayable, but Suarez is better. He just is.
@dogsbollocksgenius9480 Жыл бұрын
@@olavjorvik94 which statistics? Erm how about in his first season at Barcelona he scored 47 goals in 49 games, how about the two world cups and the ballon d’ors? Yeah Suarez was a great striker, R9 was one of the best footballers of all time, even post knee injury his goal record was insane, name me one thing Suarez done better than R9. Ronaldo was faster, he was a better finisher, he was more powerful, he was more skilful, he had everything, you must be a Liverpool fan or something, the fact you think Suarez had a better career than Ronaldo is genuinely laughable
@dasurmel1424 Жыл бұрын
@@olavjorvik94 you could make a case that he was better than cr7 in parts of that period ok. but not better than pele, van basten or r9. football is more than just scoring. or stats. also different times. when f.e. van basten played in italy scoring over 20 goals in serie a was something unknown. in laliga you had lots of players which scored ton of goals.
@ashwilliams4959 Жыл бұрын
R9? What a howler 😂
@robertbaynham2193 Жыл бұрын
Joes smile when Marvin was speaking was incredibly cute, charming man
@y1521t21b5 Жыл бұрын
I'm as _Blood Red_ as they come, but _Klopp_ still trails _Mourinho's_ EPL legacy. There is, however, less in it than many might think as a couple of single-point losses to _Citeh_ attest.
@ingolf82 Жыл бұрын
why is this a debate, Moutinho has won more premier leagues than Klopp, I hate to say that as a Liverpool fan, but it is true, this is not a contest. Now, if we are talking europe though, it's a bit closer, but it's still Mourinho, he won 2 Champions Leagues.
@connorbutler5900 Жыл бұрын
Mourinho wins on both by a long shot
@duydo6924 Жыл бұрын
On the European stage, it's not even close. Mourinho won a treble with Inter.
@kenrahhubchannel Жыл бұрын
Klopp doesn't have a better premier league legacy than Claudio Ranieri
@matthewbanton7077 Жыл бұрын
yeah because Ranieri got 90+ points 3 times didn't he
@kisovalley7234 Жыл бұрын
@@matthewbanton7077 When did Klopp win the PL with a team that should have been battling relegation? Oh yeah he didn't. Guy got bullied out of Germany by Bayern and has won 1 PL in a stupid amount of years with the best ever Liverpool team of all time according to their fans.
@kenrahhubchannel Жыл бұрын
@@matthewbanton7077 Yeah, because Klopp won a title with a relegation team...Nobody cares about your point totals when you finish 2nd mate, go tell that to the kids who are bottlers
@matthewbanton7077 Жыл бұрын
@@kenrahhubchannel when we're talking legacy, they do matter. missing out by a point to the greatest Prem team of all time twice is not something that will be forgotten.
@matthewbanton7077 Жыл бұрын
@@kisovalley7234 if the circumstances of the title come into play, then we should surely also mention that Klopp took Liverpool from mid-table mediocrity to the best team on the planet?
@mark91009 Жыл бұрын
About Rory saying arsenal have players who'll score 8-10 goals instead of 1 out and out striker .. man city did it without a striker .. so that's a good shout
@richiec808 Жыл бұрын
If youre going by legacy its klopp hes built a team and won everything. Mourinhos chelsea team was ridiculous which came at a crazy cost, similar to citys a few years back due to inflation. Also if youre talking about prem legacy then hes got to take the spurs & utd into consideration. Mourinho has had a better career as the porto & inter champioms league wins are crazy but just prem im going klopp
@Kronthedon2333 Жыл бұрын
And klopp hasn’t spent money 🤣 ? Klopp has one PL title . ONE !!!! Claudio rainieri has the same , and that was by far a bigger achievement. It has to be Mou over klopp.
@andrequek1146 Жыл бұрын
Both pep and klopp will never win the champions league with any portuguese team or italian team. Jose is GOAT.
@samono7726 Жыл бұрын
You do realize that the team that won the UCL 2012 is actually Mourinho's machine, and did so in Mourinho's image, right?
@VishwadeepShinde Жыл бұрын
@@Kronthedon2333 Check Klopp's net spend in 8 years. Its somewhere around 350-400 mil pounds in 8 YEARS. Mourinho spent that much in his early PL winning days. There's a difference. Klopp bought VVD and Alisson with that whopping 142 mil pounds of Coutinho's money. I think both are as good in terms of PL strictly. But Mourinho is better if you consider he's legacy outside the PL.
@VishwadeepShinde Жыл бұрын
@@Kronthedon2333Also don't forget Klopp lost 2 PL titles by a single point. Even with city's billion worth of team. Mourinho didn't had to cope the same against UTd and Arsenal.
@scottyh1238 Жыл бұрын
Klopp has won basically nothing outside of Covid times, it's not even a debate. Argue Mourinho with Ancelotti maybe but Klopp frankly doesn't even get in the conversation.
@louisdnd934 Жыл бұрын
Gerrard could do everything Lampard could do, Lampard can't do everything Gerrard does
@MGall_Channel Жыл бұрын
Gerrard was a beast. I hate that we have to base players on what they've won sometimes when really, we should respect their individual talent. Gerrard was the complete midfielder who could play any role in the middle and excel, and that's exactly what he did. Lampard was a glorified attacking mid/centre forward who had a multitude of good defensive mids covering him, along with some of the best forwards to supply. His job was easier. When Lampard played for England, you could see his flaws when playing deeper.
@daveadrian492 Жыл бұрын
That "Special One" press conference alone is a bigger legacy than Klopp's entire career😅
@Newmanator8 Жыл бұрын
Akins take of mou and Klopp made no sense, yes Chelsea spends money for squads but he completely ignored the fact klopp broke signing records with buying VVD and Allison Chelsea first time round was buying players for 20-35m and made a team out of the spending that only bought in 2 players for Liverpool. Same again in 2012 Chelsea bought 5/6 players at 25-40 mill each and made another team to win multiple leagues. Liverpool are yet to do that since they won the league. Cannot compare mou and klopp cause mou is just head and shoulders above majority coaches (pep, Ferguson and wenger being the only 3 who’ve come close)
@dalefrancis9414 Жыл бұрын
I'm seeing persons talking about resources lol. Clearly they are not looking at the actual data.
@ashwilliams4959 Жыл бұрын
😂 clueless chelsea fans
@Newmanator8 Жыл бұрын
@ftclips-qu8sh and what does he do in them 3 years? Stuff that only other managers can dream of. His Porto achievements alone proved how tactically superior his is over his peers.
@Newmanator8 Жыл бұрын
@@dalefrancis9414 I’m going off what I’ve witnessed the last 25 years
@christophermgwadira4400 Жыл бұрын
On first question the lady's answer is rational and thoughtful
@MGall_Channel Жыл бұрын
Even as a Liverpool fan I would have to say Mourinho. Problem with Mourinho has been his inability to adapt to the modern style of play in the prem and his toxic behaviour ruining team morale in recent years that I feel has tarnished his overall reputation unfortunately. That's what's led to several sackings. Klopp will be more fondly remembered through his longevity at a higher level while playing amazing football and having only been denied by a state owned club with 115 charges that have gone unpunished and probably never will be punished. Not based on the Prem though.
@connorjames6226 Жыл бұрын
So sure ? - Klopp made 3 ucl finals with Liverpool - mouriniho never made one with Chelsea
@MGall_Channel Жыл бұрын
@connorjames6226 we've got to respect that he's won it with FC Porto, though.
@maxke597511 ай бұрын
@@connorjames6226 please read the original question, WHO HAS THE BEST PL LEGACY? Nobody talks about CL
@eh9296 Жыл бұрын
If you want to win trophies right now or soon, it's Mourinho(Although he will get sacked in 3 seasons and might lose talents like Salah and KDB) If you want to rebuild your team in the long term, it's Klopp.
@greetingsiamross Жыл бұрын
Spot on. I could see Mourinho having won more PL trophies if he was there instead of Klopp. But I don't think Mourinho would have won a league as emphatically playing free flowing football that Klopp instills like he did in the 19/20 season
@yxngkillua7700 Жыл бұрын
mourinho won more trophies with chelsea than klopp with liverpool, so why does the long term really matter if it's less successful?
@eh9296 Жыл бұрын
@yxngkillua7700 Did he won Champions League with Chelsea?
@justlooking1087 Жыл бұрын
@@eh9296what would a UCL win have to do with his domestic legacy though?
@eh9296 Жыл бұрын
@@justlooking1087Because Klopp built a team that could work in a longer term, consistent enough to be European Champions
@simonmcpartlin6547 Жыл бұрын
All of these great managers, Mourinho, Klopp and Guardiola are amongst the best. But to be honest if you forget this football didn’t exist before the premier league nonsense I rate Brian Clough’s achievements (lets not forget what he did at Derby too)the greatest top division legacy. In 2 years went from also ran second division team to English and then European Champions. And unlike the three mentioned above it wasn’t from a huge financial wealth starting position. Oh and regading Klopp’s legacy let’s not forget that in 2 consecutive seasons he lead a team to 97 and 99 points including at one stage 35 wins in 36 matches. Without the draw in the middle v Man Utd it could have been 36 consecutive wins. Unbelievable!
@rikachu571 Жыл бұрын
The question was specifically PL legacy though in fairness. I'd also argue that the PL changed the game so much that comparing to the pre PL era is almost pointless. I'd agree re Clough though, absolute magic what he did with Forest.
@simonmcpartlin6547 Жыл бұрын
@@rikachu571 Good point I think I lost the plot trying to plug Brian Clough 😀.
@matthewbanton7077 Жыл бұрын
Jose has the greater legacy, but Klopp has had a much harder job. Mourinho never came up against a side as good as Pep's City and had the financial backing of a Russian oligarch
@duckers5120 Жыл бұрын
What have Arsenal shown to convince Rory that they are guaranteed to finish ahead of Liverpool? They have clearly regressed from last season whereas Liverpool have evidently improved. They both have almost identical stats in the league, same points, 1 more goal scored for Liverpool but also 1 more conceded. They also have the better manager. Neither seem complete enough to challenge City in my opinion.
@MrMontgomery Жыл бұрын
The way arsenal controlled city & held them down.
@fitzanderson1980 Жыл бұрын
Your opinion is valid
@duckers5120 Жыл бұрын
@@MrMontgomery Liverpool do that every year to City at their home ground aswell, what is your point? It's about overall consistency, not how you perform against City.
@mainsmain Жыл бұрын
Lampard had more goals, assists and trophies than Gerrard, there's nothing to argue
@waxmax117 Жыл бұрын
Something people seem to forget that legacies can also be tarnished. Klopp's lowest low in charge of Liverpool was finishing 5th(?), Jose has absolutely plummeted 2+ other clubs in the league. Hes gotten sacked what, 3 times? His legacy takes a hit with these events which imo makes it more of a close call than most think.
@Artemis_simetrA Жыл бұрын
Great point there. Jose, whom i absolutely admired even as a liverpool fan, kinda felt sorry for him towards the bitter end of his Premier league days.
@Hala_Madrid_7911 Жыл бұрын
Lol what clubs did Jose "absolutely plummet"? He made Chelsea into a big club so obviously not them. Utd he took to their best league finish in the last 10 years so not them. Spurs have always been a joke club so they don't really count. As far as getting sacked.. Spurs sacked him right before a cup final, that's a reflection of them not Jose. Utd have been an absolute joke since Fergie so that doesn't mean much. Chelsea he was the victim of his own success. Turned them into a big club winning trophies every year so the expectations changed, Roman wanted success every year and sacked anyone who didn't get it. Klopp meanwhile had the good fortune of landing at Liverpool, a loser club who had no expectations so he was afforded the time to build the team how he wanted. Klopp's first 2 full seasons Liverpool finished 4th and 4th, do you honestly think he would have lasted under Roman with those finishes? This is a guy who sacked Ancelotti for finishing 2nd literally 1 year after winning the EPL and FA cup double. So yeah, sacking and what not doesn't mean much.
@3allz Жыл бұрын
In regards to Arsenal needing a striker/goal scorer who will show up on the big occasions, just refer to Salah and how he's impacted Liverpool and their success.
@Mana-vv6vp Жыл бұрын
Obviously Jose, klopps only won one title😭
@poolfans Жыл бұрын
if not for Pep city, Klopp should have 3. 91 and 97 points runner up
@Me-gs3uu Жыл бұрын
@@poolfanswanna a trophy for coming second now 😂🤣🤣
@poolfans Жыл бұрын
@@Me-gs3uu can your team finish 90 just 1 behind Man City this era? 😂 Try harder
@heitlerremlalfaka4063 Жыл бұрын
What the reff association needs to do is implement an automated-VAR system that will give objectiv3 decision wherever objectivity applies, eg: ball crossing line or not. With modern tech, it is no doubt, cameras can be installed at appropriate places, and computers calculate whether or not ball has crossed a line, same goes for offside lines.
@DannyXXXXX Жыл бұрын
Why the hell did Arsenal sell Florian then? Proven goal scorer last season.
@samtrickett5993 Жыл бұрын
To the better team part of Lampard gerrard and the assists gerrard had Owen a ballon dor winner, Torres in his prime, Suarez the 3rd best player of generation arguably he wasn’t always playing with Benteke
@EvieWillNotDie Жыл бұрын
Obviously mourinho? What??
@Irish-Gael-sg4lv Жыл бұрын
The fact is that money matters.. No manager in premier league has done or could possibly do what klopp has done with the mediocre financial resources at hand... He took over a terrible team struggling to qualify for Europa league and built them into Premier league champions plus 3 UCL finals in 5 years. Their net spend has been less than Arsenal, Tottenham, Villa, West Ham, Newcastle. He has achieved miracles at Liverpool
@albibarry2999 Жыл бұрын
I couldn't think you could make me love Akinfenwa even more 😂
@bobinelmazono201 Жыл бұрын
he’s talking crap 😂
@chris9964 Жыл бұрын
I don't see Liverpool pushing City, although they could very well end up 2nd. City just seem to hit a patch of form the 2nd half of seasons that I dont think many squads can match at the moment, plus expect them to get far in Europa League, that Thursday night football is a pain. Whilst I agree with Rory on why Arsenal didn't win the league being games they threw away, you cant deny someone like Ivan Toney would be an upgrade on Jesus, whilst still allowing arsenal to play the way they do with Martinelli/Saka/Trossard/Odegaard. He definitely cant with Chelsea's record against them 😂 I'm sure I've seen Rory talk down Arsenal's "invincible" season so I respect the shamelessness of using it here whilst ignoring he had unlimited budget & still ended up getting the boot. Where were they in the league when he was sacked the second time round? That 2nd place is the biggest myth in football. He signed a lot of those players and would have only won 1 out of the last 10 EPL's with that point tally & its on GD to Leicester. Klopps 'legacy' is still to be determined, if he only wins one league title, it will always be that he only managed the one, If he manages to rebuild this Liverpool side and win it again, it'll be that. Then its if they sustain it like city have in recent years.
@paulcasey4282 Жыл бұрын
Some years it’s just not your year. Today, we were missing Odegaard, Partey, White, Timber, Jesus and ESR. That’s just too many injuries to challenge an awesome Man City. One huge positive I’d say is two years ago if we had that many injuries, we wouldn’t have as strong a xi as we did today.
@MartinKul100 Жыл бұрын
A lot of people saying Mourinho won 3 and Klopp won 1, but Klopp has 3 seasons over 92 points… he has done enough to win more, but he’s been up against the greatest side in Prem history. Then you Mix in the potential cheating from city… I reckon Klopps job; with very limited funds, puts him ahead of José. And btw Chelsea being up against two great teams in Arsenal and United isn’t a good argument; it’s easier to win a league when you have two competitors in and around 80points than one competitor that goes to 95+ points… And also; Mourinho came back to win a league that was so poor that the next season we saw Leicester win it. Klopp has 3-4 seasons that easily wins the league back then…
@minus45 Жыл бұрын
If Mourinho was the one who took over Liverpool in 2016 with financial problems we have he would not have won the league. Klopp built a team that can compete based on his philosophy. The players are not superstars but they are enormous in his system. A good example is the players who have left for greener have failed miserably. What klopp does in Liverpool is moreso a miracle. I hope that one day people will learn to respect him enough
@sidster007 Жыл бұрын
True
@SteveAustin-zv1nn Жыл бұрын
This is about legacy. Achievements. Not speculation. Mourinho achieved a lot more.
@Nostradanus86 Жыл бұрын
Lampard couldn't run back 35 yards to make a slide tackle then get the ball before an opponent or team mate to then ping a cross field ball 60 yards to a players feet before then making a run back towards the outside of the opponents box.
@ststeve5212 Жыл бұрын
This is a stupid question! Mourinho built boys to MEN. His legacy and imprint in that team carried on for years even after he was sacked the first time. The mentality he installed in that team carried the managers that came after him. Surprised no one mentioned his unbeaten home record and only conceding less than 9 goals the whole season. He also won everything in England in his first three seasons 🤷🏻♂️
@lwandilentaphane5719 Жыл бұрын
Conceded 15 goals. Great record though. I don't think it will ever be beaten.
@MM-ul3ns Жыл бұрын
The question should be Klopp vs Claudio Ranieri both only won one premier league title. Let the debate begin. I would argue Raniere, it was a greater achievement to take a team from near relegation to being champions the following season.
@Sahota2002 Жыл бұрын
😂
@MGall_Channel Жыл бұрын
Ranieri was sacked, though. Which makes it a total anomaly. He can't be a better manager if he didn't go further with that Leicester team. Absolute credit to Vardy, Mahrez, and Kante. I think those guys being part of that team at the same time was an amazing bit of business on a dime that shows you can challenge when the right hidden gems are found. I know Vardy came from the lower leagues with Leicester, btw. I think a lot of the big teams were very off colour or rebuilding that season as well, I remember, but Leicester capitalised amazingly well. They still deserved it.
@sayid-ali6524 Жыл бұрын
MOURINHO NO QUESTION!!!
@umanggada8684 Жыл бұрын
Mourinho came to Premier League from Porto and then his Chelsea conceded 15 goals. Nobody has conceded so few since. Legacy just in that one season alone.
@alexischristou3266 Жыл бұрын
Fun fact Jose Mourinho has spent the 2nd most amount of money in transfers as a manager in football history with only Pep Guardiola just ahead of him now, regardless how you rationalize it that is a huge variable for Mourinho's success at Chelsea. No matter how you look at it what Klopp has achieved with limited resources against a manager like Pep who has spent well over 1+ billion in transfers during his tenure at City is a miracle in itself.
@gordazila Жыл бұрын
Mourinho won the champions league with Porto without spending any money
@eh9296 Жыл бұрын
Yeah lol, people say a lot about Pep spending huge money while Mourinho also spent the same and almost nobody talk about it
@alexischristou3266 Жыл бұрын
@@gordazila Im sure they spent money but yeah it was very impressive at the time. That still doesent change the fact he spent fortunes when he went to Chelsea.
@TheInsanePlayz10 Жыл бұрын
@@gordazilaPrem Legacy he aint won it with Chelsea, United or Spurs
@has24hs Жыл бұрын
@@eh9296Jose managed for longer and not always at elite clubs. If you look at amount spent over the number of players purchased: Pep:26 million per player Jose : 16 million per player Klopp: 13 million per player Within the modern CL format , FC Porto is by far the squad with the least transfer value to have won it.
@MrMontgomery Жыл бұрын
Klopp absolutely, he had no money and had to sell players to create value. Klopp won the champions league & premier league with Jordan Henderson
@jamescurrall9341 Жыл бұрын
It depends on what you consider legacy, Mourinho won more that is undeniable so he is the obvious answer but he's also been sacked 4 times for poor performance. No top team plays the Mourinho style anymore, at Utd and Spurs he was called a dinosaur style wise, where most try to emulate Klopp and Pep. Klopp's best teams gained more points in the league then Mourinho's did.
@nishchaychauhan8814 Жыл бұрын
Come on. It's MOURINHO. Jose is iconic.. klopp is just another good manager, but nowhere is he touching the status of a legendary manager like mourinho
@modernhealth2023 Жыл бұрын
I would say it was tougher for Mourinho to win the Premier league back then than it is for Pep right now. I would put forward the argument that in the Premier league, he has a better legacy than Pep!!!! Teams back then were tough and having good players equally. Now Man City has the cream of players alone, sort of a greedy team and the teams of this generation are easier for Man City because they are weaker. I would have loved to see a Pep team play against a team with say Gerald, Carragher, Torres, etc: or Rooney, Christiano, or John Terry, Lampard, Drogba, Cavalho, etc. You guys saw how Pep's Barcelona struggled in the Champions league in almost all meetings with that Chelsea team.
@lukeburton4493 Жыл бұрын
This is between Klopp and Mourinho, not pep
@tlangelanishikwambana8596 Жыл бұрын
How are City a greedy team whereas City never sign players from their closest competitors? 😂😂
@jamesmichaels4979 Жыл бұрын
Klopp won everything at Liverpool. Mourino didn't at Chelsea, united and Spurs. But Jose had been around longer and was at the richest club in the league at the time. Klopp was up Against money at Chelsea, United and City and managed to win everything with 96,97 and 99pts. Mourinos highest waa 95. But Jose won more leagues and been at more clubs
@edwardoemiliano8018 Жыл бұрын
@@JonasRodgersMourinho also had the richest owner behind him when Abramovich bought chelsea in 2003😂😂😂
@21DMN Жыл бұрын
Pep no question
@tobbogun9420 Жыл бұрын
No one ever has ever argued Klopp having a bigger legacy than Mourinho. We all know The Special One is bigger even Klopp, he knows.
@amarthered Жыл бұрын
I think it's always difficult to compare different eras. I'm sure if The Normal One was there at the same time The Special One was at Chelsea, Mourinho's legacy would have been less special. But we'll never know. And if City 🇦🇪 wasn't around, Klopp would have already won three Premier league titles. So based on that it's probably Mourinho, but just because he was a bit lucky Klopp wasn't around
@geob7o Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂, That Mourinho team would have been too physical for both pep and klopp team. They were wounded lions, I don't think much would have changed
@descendingforth Жыл бұрын
Both Rory and Adebayo agreeing on the var just shows how corrupt it is!
@Me-gs3uu Жыл бұрын
Mourinho, EASILY. Don’t even try to say Jurgen Flopp
@RAHULRAMKISHORYADAV Жыл бұрын
3 premier ships for me 1 for him respect respect respect
@eeeeeetp Жыл бұрын
The champions league journey for klopp, the defeat of a centurions and treble winning city side is unbelievable
@dalefrancis9414 Жыл бұрын
City won the treble earlier this year. I don't think you should've included that squad.
@RojoBoxeador Жыл бұрын
Just to be able to compete with the juggernaut of Guardiola is impressive enough. Especially at the pointy end of football where margins are so tight already. It’d be like trying to race Bolt over 100m in a pair of crocs
@Fernandez2023E Жыл бұрын
Jose the 🐐
@DX_2_words_4_ya Жыл бұрын
Two ama,ing managers....but I would say Mourinho as a LFC fan. If Klopp had won those two champions leagues they lost in the final and another league title youd have ro say Klopp...but he didnt. Mourinho for me.
@dalewilsonii1945 Жыл бұрын
Hard to tell since Klopp isn’t finished yet. If he wins another Prem or UCL, I feel it will be him. But as it stands probably Mourinho. Taking into account Mourinhos not so successful stints at United and Tottenham, it’s tough
@connorbutler5900 Жыл бұрын
Mourinho said himself his greatest achievement was finishing 2nd with that Man Utd side.
@edwardoemiliano8018 Жыл бұрын
@@connorbutler5900I don't know how teams with tons of money count being 1st or 2nd as an achievement like that's where you suppose to finish with all that money spent 😂😂😂.....
@connorbutler5900 Жыл бұрын
@@edwardoemiliano8018 so you're saying it only counts as an achievement if you're the underdog?
@edwardoemiliano8018 Жыл бұрын
Duhhhh🙄....it's so obvious!!!! No one said that about Liverpool everytime they finished 2nd...Why?
@connorbutler5900 Жыл бұрын
@@edwardoemiliano8018 first off, I'm pretty sure everyone did give Liverpool the credit when they finished second. Secondly, Liverpool weren't really underdogs were they?
@EnemyAC130Aboverofl Жыл бұрын
On PL alone its Mourinho, however when does financial backing and competition play apart? Mourinho had a blank cheque and didnt have the financial cheats that are City to compete with
@unkul_chi Жыл бұрын
Every team that won the premier league shared the goals across the team, BUT STILL HAD ONE MAN who did a lot of the scoring. Haaland, Sallah, Vardy and the likes are good examples. Arsenal need one
@theach84 Жыл бұрын
Wrong it’s the total amount of goals you score not if halland score 30. Arsenal last year and this year scored the most or almost most goals. 88 goals last year and 23 in just a quarter of this season gone. Plus if that one striker is injured or is off form then the team loses but if we have 4 scorers then when 1 is out the other 3 can score. Plus Defense wins leagues not offense. Midfield is even more Important than the front line. If we get a top scorer then Saka martinelli odegard would all score less goals as they have to change how they play to support this top striker. Defense is priority. I would take another Saka or an inside forward/winger to rotate with Saka and or martinelli. A fit Thomas partey would do more for this team than an Ivan toney.
@Kaijufied Жыл бұрын
What about Man City in 2021/22? They had Torres, Foden, KDB and even Zinchenko in that false 9 role, no actual striker. Jesus was playing on the wing that year
@unkul_chi Жыл бұрын
@@Kaijufied ...an exception rather than the rule
@unkul_chi Жыл бұрын
@@theach84 I didn't say scoring is the only reason that a team wins the league. What you're talking about is an entirely different conversation. I was talking with respect to the question asked in the show. I simply said there's a correlation between a team winning the league and them having one of the top scorers that season, at least since the inception of the league in 1992. It's obviously not 100% of the time, and goal scoring isn't the single or most important reason a team wins the league. There's just a correlation 🤷🏾♂️
@mediacenterman8583 Жыл бұрын
How could you forget Cantona, Alan Shearer, Henry & Drogba? Sometimes you need someone to score three decisive goals in 3 games, instead of a hat-trick in one match.
@imnottellingyoumyname3050 Жыл бұрын
Not even a debate, how can this be a conversation
@WOLFanddBEAR Жыл бұрын
Jose Mourinho. The Special One.
@TradeIQ_Profits Жыл бұрын
Jose obviously...Jose came and said he is the special one...Boom its a trophy after trophy, breaking United and Arsenal dominance...Klopp came to rebuild for years only to win once
@samroberts6697 Жыл бұрын
Wait what?!?! How can it be debated Klopps won a single Premier League 😫
@eh9296 Жыл бұрын
As if Mourinho could win a title during Pep's era
@GOATZELWARDBANDWAGON. Жыл бұрын
@eh9296 Lol talking as if mourinho didn't it in some mickey mouse era he won it during SAF and wenger era
@Fernandez2023E Жыл бұрын
@@eh9296 he would
@BigSmokeMUFC Жыл бұрын
@@eh9296 he did in 2012 causing Pep to run off to his mummy 😂
@Wondering31 Жыл бұрын
@@eh9296pep bought it not won it u oil fan
@James-bb7ix Жыл бұрын
People like to hate on Jose cause of style of football which is wrong. He is one of the elites.
@ShutThePuck Жыл бұрын
Adjusted for inflation, Chelsea spent £1.5bn between 2003-2008, at a time when most clubs weren't even spending a tenth of that. Chelsea bought the league under Mourinho, they deserve credit for staying at the top but Klopp completely reinvented Liverpool under a shoestring budget in comparison to United, City, and Chelsea.
@parmaman8551 Жыл бұрын
Mourinho's 14/15 season is so underrated. He practically broke even with transfers and comfortably won the league.
@kenrahhubchannel Жыл бұрын
Well Claudio Ranieri re-invented the league with no budget at all so has a better legacy than Klopp
@WOLFanddBEAR Жыл бұрын
UTD have spent more than Chelsea and Man City.
@ShutThePuck Жыл бұрын
@@parmaman8551 Once you spend £1.5bn in football, it doesn't disappear, the players are assets which get sold, so you end up spending less to stay at the top if you're competent at buying/selling players. Doesn't absolve Chelsea of having bought the league. You can see it with Arsenal recently and how much they've had to spend just playing catch up. Klopp transformed Liverpool with far less resources, made average players world class only spending big on VVD and most recently Nunez although he's more part of the rebuilding team. Not even a Liverpool fan, I just don't think Mourinho could have done what he did in the Prem without all that money.
@ShutThePuck Жыл бұрын
@@kenrahhubchannel That Leicester title is GOATed, not just in football, in all of team sports history it's one of the greatest achievements
@melohen706811 ай бұрын
theres no problem with the VAR , its the official behind it
@klopptomisticfreeworld8742 Жыл бұрын
It would be interesting to see how Pep would do with Klopp’s resources
@queenv.713 Жыл бұрын
Thot the discussion was about klopp and Mourinho..y are you talking about pep😮
@andrequek1146 Жыл бұрын
Both pep and klopp will never win a champions league with any portuguese team or italian team. Jose is the best of all time.
@Irish-Gael-sg4lv Жыл бұрын
He wouod never take a risk like that. He's been at the 3 strongest clubs in world football over the past 15 years
@jackrodwell4967 Жыл бұрын
Did he just say city was the best team in football history? Its and argument for pl history but to say all time overall football. Just shows it doesnt matter if youve "played the game"...
@MGall_Channel Жыл бұрын
You can't argue they're not up there. They've won a treble and had the highest prem point tally ever. I'm saying this as a Liverpool fan, as much as it pains me.
@tribalpeacock Жыл бұрын
Mourinho is a brilliant manager but it was easier with Romans money. Klopp did it with fewer resources and a magnificent City team.
@mohammedhamza5560 Жыл бұрын
Mourinho had to compete with the invincibles and man united.
@eh9296 Жыл бұрын
@@mohammedhamza5560None of those teams are better than Pep's City
@tribalpeacock Жыл бұрын
@@mohammedhamza5560 The Invincibles weren't all that impressive. Klopp's LFC surpassed their points tally
@rodsitamara Жыл бұрын
@@eh9296 yea right. either way mourinho had two top teams to fight against
@mohammedhamza5560 Жыл бұрын
@@tribalpeacock just coz you surpassed a points tally doesnt really mean you can say they were not impressive. Most of the players in that team is one of the greatest pl players to ever play in the prem
@WheelUpDaBludClart Жыл бұрын
Has to be Mourinho however what Klopp has done overall I.e title challenging and a champions league is more impressive
@nathanb286 Жыл бұрын
Mourinho was great, but Klopp has shaped the modern game and taken the fight to one of the greatest teams of all time in City
@EvieWillNotDie Жыл бұрын
No and doesn't matter in comparison
@jacobhuggins7572 Жыл бұрын
Explain how he shaped the modern game please?What revolutionary work did he do?Mou did that in his time with his defensive styles,what about Klopp?
@m_cy1 Жыл бұрын
I feel like on the VAR question a lot of the issues with the delays would be resolved if say, much like tennis, each team would get a couple of challenges per game to challenge the on field decision.
@diegocadavid3406 Жыл бұрын
Diehard Liverpool fan buts its Mourinho
@kaskovic1993 Жыл бұрын
Without VAR Real Madrid will win 3 cl’s in a row again
@vrant_19 Жыл бұрын
Jose no debate. The impact this man has done in English football was something else that time
@alexnkolemulenga6238 Жыл бұрын
Respect respect respect im an arsenal fan but c’mon mourinho
@wcindola0 Жыл бұрын
"three three on my own three!! " respect josé respect!!😅😂
@senydieng732 Жыл бұрын
Mourinho currently has the bigger legacy but he had a much easier job imo. Mourinho wouldnt have done what Klopp has done at liverpool. Jose cant last longer than 3 years at a club and he cant win unless he has the most £££ (apart from porto). Plus he didn't win a UCL with Chelsea.