High Temperature Superconducting Materials

[@AbdolazimHasseli]

The best video I have ever seen about superconductivity.

[@memlafeder]

One of the best video about the subject, but also, this is now my greatest "sleeping pill" tool. I slept 3-4 times while watching it. Absolutely amazing and mesmerizing.

[@spicygolem9167]

A hidden gem. Swell job as always!

[@dog9302]

Would a superconducting powerline shock you? Because electricity takes the path of least resistance any amount of superconducting wire would be less resistive than you so would you get shocked at all?

[@gl0wbot768]

I'm here because I want to levitate and fly around undiscovered at night.

[@Root_T]

alright. 11:41 I tap out. Its late...early.... and I heard about a superconductor that works at -20 C and I just wanted to know. Idk, this is over my head now but I did learn that cooper (spelling?) pairs are not what makes this work. Still confused. Still fascinated.

[@AyaBeernuts]

Amazing video. Nice job.

[@dhruvgamerz4229]

Thanks

[@AllianceGamingTeam]

Thanks for the explanation! I heard that some scientists achieved room-temp superconductivity just recently, is that true?

[@andretate587]

Nice!

[@dalibor1356]

Can you make a video about the new LK99 material?

[@phillipterrell8914]

that material was a load of shit, as I'm sure we all know by now. more a way to push scam companies than an actual scientific discovery

[@NaniuTherapist]

Phonons are not quasi-particles of energy but excitations of the lattice of the solid.

[@dhimanroy1671]

It's the quantum of vibrational energy of lattice. So you may say it's the quasi particle of energy like photon.

[@NaniuTherapist]

@@dhimanroy1671 Okay, but would you call a cooper-pair a quasi-particle of energy? I guess not. What about any other type of quasi-particle? The only reason I posted my comment was to point out something that could mislead someone not familiar to the jargon of the field. I believe you that you know what a Phonon is, but I want people to think about the it as a state of the lattice and not just a 'quantum of energy'.

[@dhimanroy1671]

@@NaniuTherapist Quantum world is very unpredictable and the postulates of Quantum mechanics are so weird that it's hard to accept. The point is, when the theoretical results are consistent with experimental results then we may say; 'yes! our assumption is true'. Quasi particles are just like that. There's no existence but quantisation. You can see that the electromagnetic wave equation is like the equation of harmonic oscillator and then Dirac showed that in harmonic oscillator model energy is quantised. And from it theorists predicted that energy is also quantised. And experimentally black body radiation, photoelectric effect successfully confirmed that energy is quantised by the unit of 'hw'. And any model that can be represented as a harmonic oscillator, whatever it's vibrational motion of molecules or lattice you can say the energy is quantised. So physicists call it as a quasi particle. That means it has no existence but it's like a particle of energy. Particle physicists added the term 'ion' to address any particle. That's why we say photon, phonon, electron, proton etc. Even in standard model there are class of particles like fermion, boson... However, in this video the narrator said "quantum of energy" that's not a problem. But you want to tell that the explanation would be cleared.

[@NaniuTherapist]

@@dhimanroy1671 Fermions & Bosons are not a feature of the standard model, but a feature of nature. Any particle (excluding quarks, anyons and other exotic ones) is either a fermion(ic) or a boson(ic) one, these terms only refer to the spin-statistics of particles, which is either a Fermi-Dirac function with half-integer spin or a Bose-Einstein function with integer spin. The quantm world is not unpredictable, it is just not deterministic. We can give probabilities to the possible experimental outcomes and with very good agreement, since nineteen-hundred. It was not Dirac who first showed how to quantize the HO, but he was one of them who have shown that you can do it algebraically with ladder operators, which is just a more elegant way. Ions are just charged atoms or molecules and the term was suggested by Faraday long before particle physics as we know it with accelerators existed, and also long before we discovered the Photon or the Proton.

[@dhimanroy1671]

@@NaniuTherapist I mentioned 'unpredictable' as 'not deterministic or probabilistic'! I wrote it as you can't find the exact value like the classical mechanics. And also not said that Dirac first showed it but said that 'showed it' in a nice way what you've also wrote it as 'elegant way'. And I know what is 'ion'. But I just tell you that the term "on" is added to denote particles. Here 'ion' has been misunderstood. Actually I wanted to clear that what the narrator said is okay then I replied according to your reply but now I can see it's our misunderstanding! I was wrong about the features(i.e. spin half/integer). Thanks for the correction! However if you're a teacher then try to feel your students viewpoint also. Because your reply seems you're so serious to correct others silly mistakes :v

[@kokfahchong1867]

All superconductive materials have very high specific heat capacity upon reaching superconductivity. At least now we know the missing link between electricity and magnetism which is the photons. The findings of the association between superconductors and high specific heat capacity may again prompt us to believe the important role than played by photons in fostering superconductivity. Precisely, superconductors are strong antiferromagnetic substances that repel away the external magnetic field that we coined as meissner effect. To be honest, we don't think electrons played any important role in superconductivity. It's time to focus on the right thing, the photons. Superconductive substances possess superconductivity characteristics mainly because of its unique nucleus structure that able to stockpile abundant stationary photons at certain low temperatures. Thus, at critical temperature, the specific heat capacity is also at maximum level too. If you are interested in real discoveries, I would recommend you to read my book, The Unification Theory - Volume One and you will be amazed with lots of new, interesting discoveries. In God I trust. .

[@ronmizrahi6085]

What are recent achievements in the field of High Temp. Superconductivity?

[@Snow-ns8gm]

I recently read an article about how researchers managed to achieve superconductivity at room temperature but it was at some ridiculous pressure so not feasible for any applications yet but still interesting

[@chiily9419]

Do more science videos!

[@anagram3629]

I think this video could have used better organization since it kind of seems all over the place

[@equinox5754]

I think I agree

[@samirfakoua]

So is science... especially chemistry

[@thelastfrontier9578]

@@samirfakoua Not really, the organization of science should make sense

[@eavyeavy2864]

The intelcual property of this is why 4 Chinese in Malaysia MH340 was disappear

[@user-dc6wi1xc4o]

The Chinese are going to make superconductors hella expensive by lowering the supply of rare earth metals

[@johnmanni227]

in the 1980 was when tr 3b was built, haha

[@UPAKHOSALA]

What is BCS theory?

[@phillipterrell8914]

it's the Cooper pair condensation idea that he briefly mentioned

[@theanswer9852]

Very interesting subject, but hard to understand

[@dhruvgamerz4229]

It is no a hard subject. it's a interesting subject

[@podunktown2526]

imagine how hard it is to come up with new ideas for stuff like superconductors 😬

[@joelsoncdma]

friend if this quantum lock be invention? (false). The nitrogen freezed Aether nearest magnetic poles inside material...think in this (the material now is magnetic ) AETHER CAN BE PROVED (true). {isso explica porque o imã pode girar em seu eixo magnético...em supercondutividade isso não deveria ocorrer [variação do campo magnético geraria Ed corrent (fomos enganados?)] }. Congratulaitions! like you!

[@jake_runs_the_world]

First

[@gustaurasmussen2959]

Congrats

[@rajat7351]

Congrats

[@jake_runs_the_world]

@@rajat7351 hahah bro 2 years ago, give me a break