these two men also had a tremendous amount of respect for one another, in fact the Romans actually destroyed Scipio's journals after his death because they were so complementary of Hannibal, whom Scipio viewed as a teacher more than an enemy.
@animula69082 жыл бұрын
Hannibal: the o g magnificent bastard
@lostvayne39772 жыл бұрын
That’s actually really cool honestly How do we know of Scipio’s actions without his journals? Did they destroy most or all of them
@martinrosenberger Жыл бұрын
@@lostvayne3977 probably the senate just wrote about how they burned them and they praised Hannibal, because they were scared of figures like scipio, the senate does this types of things, they did the same with Tiberius, which was in fact not a bad emperor.
@denusklausen3685 Жыл бұрын
Wasn't Scipio tasked with razing Carthage later? A cruel way of making him lose the respect. Or am I wrong?
@sic5764 Жыл бұрын
@@denusklausen3685 Different Scipio, that one was the cousin of Scipio Africanus and was called Scipio Africanus the younger
@Azaghal19888 жыл бұрын
To Hannibal's comment about being remembered as the greatest general of all time if not for Zama: I think he has a shot at that even with Zama. His Battles are taught more than 2000 Years after he lost, and even his enemies feared and admired him long after his glory days. Greetings
@cpob20138 жыл бұрын
caesar is the better general. caesar, pompey, octavian, antony, trajan, belassarius, all of them were better generals. hannibal fought 1 war and he lost it. he lost big. sure he had good battles but he couldnt fight a war.
@mohamedyabre26338 жыл бұрын
pompey, octavian, antony, trajan, belassarius better than Hanibal? no
@cpob20138 жыл бұрын
mohamed yabre they could actually win wars
@TheBacknblack928 жыл бұрын
my top 5 1. Alexander 2. Caesar 3. Sabutai 4. Hannibal 5. Napoleon
@cpob20138 жыл бұрын
***** "you know how to win victories, but you do not know how to use them" he could never gain anything from his wins.the entire italian campaign was meaningless.
@BazBattles8 жыл бұрын
Scipio was a badass
@chrishansen4567 жыл бұрын
oof
@coolbear55987 жыл бұрын
BazBattles i
@orbisdux13977 жыл бұрын
BazBattles could of been the first emperor wayyyy before Cesar
@juanmontojo25957 жыл бұрын
BazBattles I
@hydra12597 жыл бұрын
BAZ!
@evertenplaza36738 жыл бұрын
"Oh my god its the cavalry"
@RickyBobby_USA8 жыл бұрын
I know...it would bother me to no end that I had cavalry behind me...maybe Hannibal hoped he would finish off the Romans before they returned...but why wouldn't he be able to see them coming?
@TheBacknblack928 жыл бұрын
+RickyBobby BobbyRicky you can only play with the hand you're dealt. Hannibal was pretty screwed as soon as his elephants veered off course into his own cavalry. He did the best he could in that situation and had his cavalry lead them on a wild goose chase hoping they would take themselves out of the battle like the Roman middle took themselves out at lake trasame. if he could finish off the Romans before the cavalry came back then he'd win. It was the best solution in a bad situation, but even the best solutions don't always work
@MultiGreatNinja8 жыл бұрын
So tracer was the reason why the roman's won that day
@thelurkingpanda36058 жыл бұрын
it was effective in keeping the cavalry (which outnumbered them) off them for the whole battle (until the end) almost looks planned.
@gabemerritt31398 жыл бұрын
+jessie briones I got the joke don't worry
@Daladari7 жыл бұрын
Council; "Ha! No army for you!" Scipio: "Yo! Who wants to invade Africa?" Veterans all together "YEEEEAAAAAHHHH"
@skeptic7817 жыл бұрын
Daladari XIII get rekt senate xd
@milesbeler39747 жыл бұрын
"Let's name it after me when we're done!"
@parthiancapitalist27336 жыл бұрын
That council is called the Senate
@thegrass71996 жыл бұрын
Scipio : look at me I'm the Senate now!
@colonelkernelcob84875 жыл бұрын
Senate: Oh... *F U C K*
@worsethanjoerogan80617 жыл бұрын
It must have been infuriating for Hannibal to win victory after victory, but be unable to finish off Rome because the Carthaginian Senate wouldn't cooperate. He's like "I'm winning, send more troops and money" and Carthage is just like "Nah you got this, we don't feel like spending the money".
@OCinneide6 жыл бұрын
They did send help but it got cut down. Hasdrubal tried to reinforce him but got killed in northern Italy and his other brother lost the war in Iberia.
@fdkfskfkvmk4412547415 жыл бұрын
@@OCinneide Yeah Hasdrubal and his army got destroyed in battle of Metaurus.
@dreamhunterscuffy8695 жыл бұрын
And then Hannibal lost ._.
@timothymclean5 жыл бұрын
Carthage didn't have the money or troops to spare. The problem wasn't apathy, it's that Hannibal was basically the only successful Carthaginian general.
@devvv46165 жыл бұрын
The Roman Senate were also pulling strings against Scipio, good thing he still overcame it.
@Comradcommodore6 жыл бұрын
Scipio is one of the most underrated not talked about people from his time. Defeated Hannibal , fought amazingly in Spain , got offered a crown but he turned it down , volunteered to lead the army cause no one else wanted too , and then in his later years was put on trial by jealous senators. The dudes life is a awesome action movie lol , I hate that no one knows who he is
@danielhercules20619 ай бұрын
Idk if you found it, but there is a pretty good trilogy written by Santiago Posteguillo, Africanus.
@Comradcommodore9 ай бұрын
@@danielhercules2061 I'll check it out 100%
@babaguy048 ай бұрын
Bro replied 5 years later that's crazy
@Comradcommodore8 ай бұрын
@@babaguy04 I'm still alive and trucking lol
@babaguy048 ай бұрын
@@Comradcommodore Good to see take care lol
@506thLittleberry7 жыл бұрын
According to a famous and well respected historian (me), the first elephants veered into their own cavalry because Scipio deployed his secret weapon, the fearsome war mouse, onto the field of battle.
@MalucoLapin6 жыл бұрын
tite-live pretends that romans horns were so loud they scared the elephants.
@mightypsychobat91446 жыл бұрын
Actually... They weren't mice... They might have been tar-burning pigs
@soniabu23166 жыл бұрын
@@MalucoLapin With thousands of men blowing them in unison they very well could be,
@no.53045 жыл бұрын
I have no words. You’ve earned 3 subscribers because I have 3 accounts
@kocakOFarc5 жыл бұрын
this is my favorite youtube comment ever
@LordVarangian8 жыл бұрын
wait what? did the roman cav finally did something?
@TheWoollyFrog8 жыл бұрын
Roman cav? I didn't even know such thing existed.
@Greensiteofhell8 жыл бұрын
Usually they forced broken tribes etc into the cavalry service or hired some from there allies. The early Roman cavalry was nobles and alike.
@TheWoollyFrog8 жыл бұрын
Greensiteofhell Yes, it was a joke to hint at their mercenary and unqualified upper class aspects of it.
@zeus07107 жыл бұрын
hahahaha finally but half of the cav was numidian mercenaries
@omarsherif90867 жыл бұрын
Armin Cal Numidian* Nubia is south of Egypt, Numidia is on the North West of Africa
@rin_etoware_29897 жыл бұрын
As Cicero said, Inter arma enim silent leges. In times of war the law falls silent.
@cr31607 жыл бұрын
Matthew Tolentino Literally translates roughly to "Laws are silent between weapons (arms)"
@myownchannel30506 жыл бұрын
Nowadays Marshall Law
@pijon49246 жыл бұрын
Lol thanks for the clarification I was like "where's the verb!"
@hedgehog31807 жыл бұрын
Honestly Zama is probably my favourite historical battle. There is so much history, and drama and everything jam packed into that one battle. And the entire war. The world would have bern so much different had it gone differently.
@Garrett12407 жыл бұрын
I completely agree. One of the most momentous events in recorded history.
@mayheim65354 жыл бұрын
but not iconic like cannae
@peterongan96554 жыл бұрын
@@mayheim6535 Cannae is one-sided which is boring.
@zaarongaming81743 жыл бұрын
@@peterongan9655 Cannae had one-sided results, but the battle itself was anything but. For most of the battle, Rome was dominating Carthage. It was only once Hannibal's 8000 Libyans trapped the Romans that the tides of battle changed.
@eutropius26992 жыл бұрын
My favorite battle during the Punic wars is the naval battle of Ecnomus Which is STILL the largest naval battle in history
@infidelheretic9234 жыл бұрын
“Elephants are overrated.” -Hannibal (at some point probably)
@markcannon85223 жыл бұрын
😂😂
@Captain_Mercury3 жыл бұрын
Probably after zama
@TheLastYokel3 жыл бұрын
@@Captain_Mercury definitely after Zama XD
@liriani3 жыл бұрын
yeah they were fucking stupid
@robmeehan72084 жыл бұрын
"The elephant threat had now been neutralized." Didn't expect to hear that today, but I'm glad that I did.
@Aravaganthus7 жыл бұрын
Hannibal might have had the most experienced soldiers in human history in his army, but Scipio had the most *motivated* soldiers in human history in his.
@feelthepony6 жыл бұрын
scipio was backed by the state,hannibal never was.
@cpsoup87756 жыл бұрын
@@feelthepony backed by the state? They gave scipio 0 legions, he had a lot of enemies in the senate, if they let scipio gather men it was cause they had the hope that he would die in africa, i think they fear Scipio just look at the end of his life and career, humiliated and exiled from rome. Scipio was a genius just like Hannibal, but both of them where abandoned by their states
@equalssign446 жыл бұрын
Great generals don’t listen to thier governments.
@SuperDeadzombeh5 жыл бұрын
@@equalssign44 that's just asking to lose horribly
@bkjeong43025 жыл бұрын
cp soup Ironically they died in the same year in the same situation; as two old military geniuses surrounded by political enemies and hiding in exile.
@CrackSmonka5 жыл бұрын
Why are there so few videos of Scipio's life and great battles? He was arguably the best general in Rome's history, and he contributed to expand its power more than anyone else even with all the hate he received from his own Senate. Please make more videos about Africanus. Top five in the Generals Hall of Fame for sure.
@bello97402 жыл бұрын
agreed. doesn't get enough love for his contributions
@dyingearth11 ай бұрын
History are written by people with grudges. Scipio had a LOT of enemies in Roman Senate, including one Cato the Elder who always advocated the total destruction of Carthage. It got so bad he finally quit the political life and retired. He got more enemies writing slanders against him than friends.
@danielhercules20619 ай бұрын
Hey, idk if you have found it, but there's a pretty good (and kinda historically accurate) trilogy written about the whole life of Scipio. Africanus, by Santiago Posteguillo
@RyRy20578 жыл бұрын
Sometimes I feel bad for Hannibaby, but then I remember we'd have no Caesar if he'd won.
@obibellowme8 жыл бұрын
Hannibaby😂😂😂
@red_isopat8 жыл бұрын
But would there be a Carthaginian version of Caesar?
@RyRy20578 жыл бұрын
+Gentel Noober Probably not, as the Carthaginians weren't into conquest as much as colonization/tributary states. Hispania was an except rather than the rule. They were content to buy out Saharan people's instead of fighting them.
@akatsukami95788 жыл бұрын
+Gentel Noober: Depends on how much you like Spengler's (Oswald, not that guy who writes for the _Asia Times_) metahistoriical theory.
@maxradke21898 жыл бұрын
but... rome is love... rome is life...
@zecoregamer52888 жыл бұрын
8:29, then the winged hussars arrived
@casparvoncampenhausen52494 жыл бұрын
Nice
@user-wd1tt2qw8d5 ай бұрын
"UM Azctully Winged hussars didn't exist back then 🤓"
@leahcollins80378 жыл бұрын
Literally thank you for this whole series! I've got my GCSE Classics Mock Examination tomorrow afternoon, which is all about the second Punic war and we have to know the battles inside and out. Thanks for the brilliant descriptions, I'm feeling confident going into this now!!
@gaiusjuliuspleaser8 жыл бұрын
Do Carrhae next, please! It's an interesting, unusual battle AND a great story about greed and hubris.
@justsumguy67008 жыл бұрын
They've done one already visit the channel
@gaiusjuliuspleaser8 жыл бұрын
Son of Egypt That was on the Battle of Cannae, against Hannibal in Italy. I meant Crassus' battle against the Parthians.
@obibellowme8 жыл бұрын
Have you read the forgotten legion? It's a really entertaining and informative book and it has a lot of detail about the battle of carhae
@gaiusjuliuspleaser8 жыл бұрын
Noah Borch I haven't, but I will! Thanks for the tip!
@justsumguy67008 жыл бұрын
+Sacha Daenens my bad sorry
@martonk8 жыл бұрын
Praised be the glory of HISTORIA CIVILIS
@TheZod008 жыл бұрын
Keep these videos up dude, they are amazing! I never lose interest even for a second.
@wojciechzakowicz89108 жыл бұрын
I really like that you're so focused on strategy and organization. It's like a 40-minute documentary cut down only to the parts I'm interested in. As far as I'm concerned, you don't need to add anything to your format.
@htf55557 жыл бұрын
Poor hanny. Wanted to be destroyer of Rome instead became its teacher.
@soundgfx71668 жыл бұрын
the roman cavalry finally managed to do something
@jmiquelmb7 жыл бұрын
Hidenori Shimazu Funny thing, it wasn't even Roman. They were foreign allies. Romans were shit at cavalry and ships, but their heavy infantry, logistics and war economy was A++
@no.53045 жыл бұрын
It was mostly the Numidians
@emirabdelkader88685 жыл бұрын
Numidian Cavalry the best of Africa and Mediterranean
@alex_zetsu5 жыл бұрын
It was the Roman cavalry, not their higher quality Numidian counterparts which won the day. Most of the Numidians just persued the Carthaginian cavalry endlessly after the battle or stormed Hannibal's empty camp. The Roman cavalry, when they finally realized what was going on, they only managed to get a small contingent of their Numidia allies back
@neutronalchemist32414 жыл бұрын
@@jmiquelmb Romans higly valued their cavalry. They know it would have fought in numerical inferiority in much clashes, but they didn't count on cavalry to win battles. They only needed their cavalry to prevent the enemy one to surround their infantry and launch a cohordinated attack on it. A task that the Roman cavalry fulfilled much of the times.
@infidelheretic9235 жыл бұрын
This is way more exciting than any fantasy battle I’ve ever read.
@gtabigfan348 жыл бұрын
So, what's next? You finished all about Hanny. I would really like to see about Alexander or Napoleon.
@nikoscarrotkiller19478 жыл бұрын
hanny..i bet nobody ever called him that
@ricericericericericericerice8 жыл бұрын
There are lots more roman battles to talk about. I'd love videos on Constantine's wars. The Milvian Bridge in particular
@Hero1010108 жыл бұрын
+Adolph Hitler Uhhh. What about your exploits, Adolph? The early years of blitzkrieg would also make for an interesting video series.
@DBeiki8 жыл бұрын
Napoleon would be good but i would also love to hear some persian or chinese battles, but it may not be in his area of expertise.
@rexvonrex17678 жыл бұрын
I support the claim for Alexander videos!
@davea998 жыл бұрын
I always get excited when you post a new video
@chewbacca4072 Жыл бұрын
NGL it's really weird going back to some of your older videos and seeing some people as circles. Gave me a nostalgia flashback
@Flyingtart8 жыл бұрын
Best part of the day is when you come home to chill online and see Historia Civilis has uploaded a new video.
@beansbeans99728 жыл бұрын
Take a look at these great generals, Alexander The Great, Julius Caesar and Hannibal. They were all excellent generals, but two of them (Alexander and Caesar) both were rulers or had a fair amount of power ( E.G Caesar as Rome had a senate not a monarchy in his time conquering Gaul). Hannibal didn't have that much power. The leader of Carthage at the time should have seen his victories at Trebia, Trasimene and Cannae, and sent more supplies and men to him. They didn't though, so Hannibal couldn't besiege Rome. I think the leader of Carthage at the time thought that if Hannibal captured Rome and won the war, he/she (I don't know who they were) would be overthrown. If he had the support or was a ruler, then maybe Hannibal would be considered the greatest general of all time.
@ageco.68968 жыл бұрын
Carthage was an oligarchic republic, they did not really have a single leader.
@ageco.68968 жыл бұрын
It means it was a republic however a lot of power was held higher up. Oligarchic meaning lots of power held by a "small" group.
@ageco.68968 жыл бұрын
+Cecil Holstein Ya basically from what I understand.
@TheBacknblack928 жыл бұрын
The oligarchy was extremely corrupt and jealous of Hannibal. the oligarchy ruled Carthage. Hannibal did basically become chief magistrate of Carthage after Zama. His reforms and payment plans with Rome were actually pretty successful. Rome became extremely concerned with how quickly Carthage was getting back together under Hannibal so they basically forced Carthage to send him into exile
@TheAlgorath8 жыл бұрын
Hamilcar Barca was the major force behind the first punic war, yes.
@NetGhoul6668 жыл бұрын
That was more fascinating than every history lesson I had in school. Alexander the Great or Genghis Khan would be lovely.
@mynameisinigomontoya81793 жыл бұрын
Actually Hannibal had hundreds of latins from Italy in his last line that he pressed into service. He kept them in the rear just in case they decided to turn sides and help the Romans so it would be easier to defend against a betrayal with his second line. This was according to the writings of levy.
@giftzwerg73457 ай бұрын
That doesnt really make sense tho, if they betraied him he would be surrounded. It is allso well know that he kee his elite in reserve, somthing he commonly did. Unreliable troops are to be put in front of you or maby in second line. Bc if they betrai you in the first, not mutch changes, more so, unless there is a secret agreemen t( in whitch case you are fucked either way and then it would still be better to have them in fornt of you.) They will have to be ready to fight the romans, bc they dont know / can trust them. so Having them in the middle as cannon fodder / a barrier make a lot more sense.
@justin9088 жыл бұрын
This makes me excited for Lindybeige's In Search of Hannibal graphic novel!
@XXTheMoleXX7 жыл бұрын
Great video and great channel. I think one of the unique things you add to the library of historical analysis here on KZbin is that you are really good at providing perspective for important events/situations that might otherwise be overlooked by someone less learned. For example: the way you described Scipio's success in Spain and his rise through the ranks despite lacking the prerequisites really brings down to Earth (for me, at least) the importance of his commanding abilities during 2nd Punic War. Anyway, keep up the good work.
@hoop69883 жыл бұрын
I agree.
@davemartino49538 жыл бұрын
these videos are of exceptional quality, keep up the fantastic work!
@classycthulhu84497 жыл бұрын
Ex Deo brought me here. For those who don't know, Ex Deo is a Canadian death metal band whose songs mainly revolve around roman history. There latest album, Immortal Wars, is about the 2nd Punic war, with one of the final songs being about the battle of Zama.
@riftbandit2238 жыл бұрын
8:27 that drama build up tho xD lol I was on the edge of my seat.
@ideallyjekyl52008 жыл бұрын
Oh I'm so glad to see another video from you.
@alucardromeo8 жыл бұрын
that fcking war elephant symbol XD
@lactosetheintolerant18126 жыл бұрын
+Corey Messick Except that studies suggest that those who use more "vulgar" language tend to be more intelligent. Also this is compounded by the fact that only the witless think that certain words are inherently "good" or "bad." The only thing that matters to the punch of the word is the context in which is used, and how people interpret them. In other words, fuck off. I hate people language policing over a collection of throat noises apparently being inherently "good" or "bad." That kind of objective morality DOES NOT EXIST in language. If that were the case, then comedy would simply not exist as we know it.
@gianferrepuse88738 жыл бұрын
Goodness I love this! It gives a whole new perspective of ancient battles. It also made me miss playing "Rome: Total War", loved that game
@jakethespaceman98968 жыл бұрын
Romans: Oh, no. We're fighting the most experienced army in history. Roman Cavalry: Cheers, Luv! The cavalry's here!
@--91208 жыл бұрын
You're videos are awesome, glad to see more
@paulduffy45855 жыл бұрын
This is my social life, here at 1am after two hours of reading strangers arguing about a 2000 year old battle. Phone at 4%. Ready to die. When it does I'll be relieved and pissed off all at once. Poor Hannibal. The student had become the master.
@hugohom22807 жыл бұрын
this is thebest video in youtube ive seen it like 10 times
@Alliloux8 жыл бұрын
Wonderful content. Thank you. I'd love to see something on Frederick the Great.
@BeesNTrees476 жыл бұрын
HC everytime i re listen to your work i gain a new layer of appreciation. You can pack more value in your videos in ten minutes than i often get from hour long podcasts. For example, including that tiny tidbit about his army trying to declare him king, thats a very important little detail absent from a very lengthy podcast and here you are pluggin it in with a quick sentence.
@michaelpisciarino53485 жыл бұрын
0:10 Publius Cornelius Scipio 0:53 Landslide Election to Consul 2:30 3:17 The Most Experienced Army in Human History 5:47 Elephants and Cavalry Gone, Infanty Vs Infanty. FIGHT 7:30 Oo. Hannibal Was Ready 8:25 The Roman Cavalry Got The Carthaginians!
@someguy92938 жыл бұрын
So in short this was Hanable's waterloo.
@kucingcat86878 жыл бұрын
Some guy not really, in the battle of Waterloo, Napoleon army were outnumbered and in this battle it was Hannibal's army that outnumbered the Roman army.
@IMPERATOR-EL7 жыл бұрын
not really, the army was really 3 parts, 1 part was hannibals army from italy and the other two were carthages forces, at the begining of the battle the other two parts abandoned hannibal to fight with his part of the army, in reality he was outnumbered
@nickcara975 жыл бұрын
More like Hannibals Leipzig
@TomSeliman994 жыл бұрын
Waterloo is an overrated battle. Napoleon was outnumbered
@fernandoespinosa15964 жыл бұрын
Napoleon lost in Russia.
@ekin42608 жыл бұрын
Great job as always. Zama is one of my favourite battles of all time, and you managed to make it even more exciting than it normally is.
@Ollie22208 жыл бұрын
I love your videos, really have sparked an interest in Roman and other ancient civilizations battle tactics and political scenes. Keep making them :)
@alfinandy16128 жыл бұрын
Omg i was so happy when i saw this at my feed
@magnvsmarcvs8 жыл бұрын
This was just what I needed :)
@mmadddog5 жыл бұрын
Garbage always gets taken out in the end...good work Scipio
@Punicia20 күн бұрын
He used Hannibal’s tactics against him. Hannibal was the better general tired from constant government rejection and troop disobedience. Disrespecting someone doesn’t give you a better legacy than them.
@mmadddog20 күн бұрын
@Punicia I think your in the wrong discussion group,..what i meant to say was,...Garbage=filthy,dirty pile of ___t
@ElectronLord8 жыл бұрын
YES I LOVE THIS CHANNEL
@cmdrfrosty39855 жыл бұрын
Scipio exists Carthage:Why do I hear boss music
@cameronlingo29695 жыл бұрын
Right before the battle Hannibal found a save point, extra health and ammunition.
@samhughes84368 жыл бұрын
Great vid man
@frauleinhohenzollern3 жыл бұрын
I can't believe we know as much as we do thousands of years after this happened. It's incredible
@JoshBruzzzano8 жыл бұрын
You just keep getting better and better. I fucking love this channel
@Derederi8 жыл бұрын
New video!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YAAAAAAAY!!!!!!!
@paulteti7 жыл бұрын
OUTSTANDING! Thanks for the great videos.
@howwwwwyyyyy5 жыл бұрын
He was one of the greatest generals of all time-they still teach Cannae today
@Mingus7188 жыл бұрын
I love this channel so much
@blonded05324 жыл бұрын
3:08 I’d say that if Caesar had any soldiers that participated in all of his campaigns from Gaul to Egypt, they’d be the most experienced army in history,
@casparvoncampenhausen52494 жыл бұрын
He did, the tenth, he raised them in Gaul, they fought there, in the civil war, in Egypt and in the civil war in Africa again, during that time, they mutinied twice due to their term if service expiring (twice)
@Rpgesusgoingin3 ай бұрын
He did he had a lot of them I’ve seen people in documentary’s say they’re some of the most experienced soldiers in history
@Chaz-q2l21 күн бұрын
very helpful video
@TheScott100128 жыл бұрын
2:21 check the spelling of "invasion". Great video btw!
@BroodyQuil8 жыл бұрын
The Senate was very nervous when they wrote the decree.
@TheScott100128 жыл бұрын
+monsterGrey5 Hahahahaha
@SGTRVN18 жыл бұрын
He put that in on purpose, for you nitpickers.
@OHYS6 жыл бұрын
@@BroodyQuil it's not often a reply to a comment gets more likes than the original comment itself.
@paulteti8 жыл бұрын
Outstanding, thanks for the video.
@Blacksmith__7 жыл бұрын
I feel like you should have developed Scipio and Hannibals's relationships with the Numidians and the maneuvering before the battle, although it would've made the video longer. Relevant stuff that makes the battle itself even more dramatic.
@dexterjettster88755 жыл бұрын
this one is my favorite battle on your whole channel
@19maurice668 жыл бұрын
Love the videos, would you consider branching out more into other periods of history? I'm particularly interested in the Napoleonic era, Talavera or Waterloo would be fascinating.
@Grumppant8 жыл бұрын
Another excellent video! Good job!
@tempestandacomputer69518 жыл бұрын
Napoleonic warfare HAS to be something to come from the future from you guys!
@Max-zr7hr6 жыл бұрын
Can't get enough of these videos great job!
@stevenreid22237 жыл бұрын
5:40-5:55 The skirmishers are just like, I'm gonna pretend like this never ever happened.
@maxiritzer90616 жыл бұрын
I thought I would be the only one who noticed it.
@FH_Forge8 жыл бұрын
dude I love these videos, try are everything I hoped I would've learned in history classes. thank you!
@FH_Forge8 жыл бұрын
*they are
@thefrosty19258 жыл бұрын
2 videos in 1 month? The God's are pleased with Rome this day! Praises be to Venus and Mars!
@k0a1a5F0rLife8 жыл бұрын
Best video yet. Keep it up!
@stevecarnall8328 жыл бұрын
That was his father that died at Cannae. His name is publies Corneulious. Scipio is his son.
@moonknightish7 жыл бұрын
His father died in Spain.
@Sebach828 жыл бұрын
Damn, man, these are getting better and better!
@Sebach828 жыл бұрын
I just realized that this is the battle that they were "recreating" in the Colosseum for Russel Crowe in "Gladiator." Isn't it?
@AhrimanVII8 жыл бұрын
Awesome work as always. I don't know if you have the time to do the proper reaserch but could you one day do some videos about the tactics and battles of Tamerlan? ( He arguably had the best army ever in human history) It would allow you to use more of these war elephants symbols ^^
@rolfskytte8 жыл бұрын
Wow thanks for this video. Unique ambience and very good recounting of this historical event.. Good stuff
@saftsuse8666 жыл бұрын
Scipio was the greatest Roman who ever lived. In comparison Cesar was a despot. Scipio could have gone for the throne, but did not put himself before the republic as Cesar did. And to that alone we should honour him. Scipio was the first Roman general to expand Roman territories outside Italy and islands around the Italian mainland when he conquered the Carthaginian territory of Iberia for Rome. But that was not his greatest feat. After the victory over Hannibal he acted forgiving. Many Roman aristocrats expected Scipio to raze Carthage to the ground after his victory. However, Scipio dictated extremely moderate terms in contrast to an immoderate Roman Senate. While the security of Rome was guaranteed by demands such as the surrender of the fleet, and a lasting tribute was to be paid, the strictures were sufficiently light for Carthage to regain its full prosperity. With Scipio's consent, Hannibal was allowed to become the civic leader of Carthage. He was during his lifetime greatly hailed for his intellect. He was probably the greatest proponent for grecophilia, and thus helped bring Greek philosophy and art to Rome. While Cesar conquered a whole lot more new land for Rome, Scipio stopped the Republic from falling apart by stopping Hannibal. And stopping Hannibal wasn't just a military victory, before that he had to defeat the paralyzed Senate. In comparison Cesar brought civil war and devastation to Rome in order to get his will across. In contrast Scipio tried to bring the Romans together. In the end Scipio was betrayed by the Senate. Unfounded charges were put against him that were only meant to discredit him before the public. He ordered his burial to be far from the city of Rome and wrote on his grave "Ingrata patria, ne ossa quidem habebis" - ungrateful fatherland, you will not have my bones. His great intelligence, tactical and strategic understanding, his willingness to fight for what he believed in, his ability to not put himself first, his sense of justice and his mercy - this is the reason I believe Scipio was the greatest Roman leader there ever was. But this is also the reason he is not remembered as such. We tend to remember the big conquerors, the emperors, the dictators, the tyrants. I fear if Hitler had lived in the Roman times we would have celebrated him above Scipio as well. But to me Scipio was the greatest Roman who ever lived.
@johnkim78025 жыл бұрын
@Saft Suse Well stated! You couldn't have said it better!
@charliesaint5 жыл бұрын
@@johnkim7802 This comment was plagiarized from Wikipedia.
@charliesaint5 жыл бұрын
@Águila701 Scipio's legacy is just "sort of putting the final nails on the coffin" of Carthage? How about being responsible for the future greatness of Rome?
@DocterWaffles5 жыл бұрын
@Catch_Me_If_You_Can how was he not
@greenmushroom42588 жыл бұрын
Great as always
@StealthDonut17 жыл бұрын
Well done! This is a great series, sir! I'd like to request you do a video on the Battle of Isandlwana and/or Rorke's Drift, or Cowpens (sometimes called "Little Cannae") and Guilford Courthouse, but any good battle video will do! :)
@danielfalhofaastrup17638 жыл бұрын
Yet another great video!! :)
@Fergus998 жыл бұрын
Those elephants tho, great video as always:)
@killamonjaromon8 жыл бұрын
wow you make these battles sound really entertaining. This video was well worth the wait.
@iigel3526 ай бұрын
Hannibal was an exellent tactician but that was it, while scipio was a multi talented guy who excelled hannibal at basically everything else, especially the grand strategy, leadership, and diplomacy.
@Diogenerate8 жыл бұрын
thank you for making these
@tomcat-ek3bh8 жыл бұрын
Like you have your boy Caesar, I have my homie Hannibal.
@as7river3 жыл бұрын
Your homie Hannibal's got nothing on my boy Caesar. My boy literally destroyed the Roman Republic, something Hannibal never could do.
@ED-wf1pu8 жыл бұрын
Love your videos Keep them coming
@Telsion8 жыл бұрын
where did the skirmishers go? or were they like normal troops but with ranged weapons? bc then you should have added those divisions back as regular infantry imo XD
@ql90668 жыл бұрын
no, they are ranged units, they normally don't have great first line ability xD
@TheBacknblack928 жыл бұрын
They were ranged troops. what use could they have been after they did their jobs? Having them throw missiles during the brawl would hit their own troops. They were probably lightly armoured so sending them into a meat grinder vs armoured troops could cause a mass route.
@ql90668 жыл бұрын
And roman skirmishers were used to desorganizate(idk if this is good spelled) the enemy troops and not to kill.
@Telsion8 жыл бұрын
since the main Roman soldiers also had throwing spears, thats where my confusion came from. everyone, thx for the answers!
@ql90668 жыл бұрын
Telsion lol
@aramhalamech42042 жыл бұрын
What strikes me as interesting when it comes to Hannibal's comment about the battle, is that it is him bragging about his own achievements as well as a huge indirect compliment to Scipio.
@chipaway7 жыл бұрын
Casualties: Rome/Scipio (army of 35.100): 2,500 killed 4,000 wounded Carthage/Hannibal (army of 40.000): 20,000 killed 20,000 captured seems to me like hannibal "got knocked the fuck out"!
@IMPERATOR-EL7 жыл бұрын
i dont believe the sources on that battle
@kittenkat49876 жыл бұрын
Hannibal got Hannibaled.
@raminoramino48054 жыл бұрын
Google that : Battle Of Cannae
@chipaway4 жыл бұрын
ramino ramino i did. what about it?
@african88558 жыл бұрын
Great work and your vids are getting only better.
@TheFancyRoman8 жыл бұрын
Wait... you said "years later", so does that mean that Hannibal lived after the battle of Zama? Wouldn't Rome just kill off the person who won Rome in 3 different battles? Couldn't Hannibal maybe recruit another army? No? I just think that if you lose 3 battles against a general and then finally win, you shouldn't let him live.
@RickyBobby_USA8 жыл бұрын
Wiki that...it talks about his exile and death.
@VMUDream8 жыл бұрын
This battle was the end of the second punic war and they went on to fight a third. So ya maybe killing him would have been a good idea.
@TheBacknblack928 жыл бұрын
he didn't just live, he became chief magistrate of Carthage. Hannibal was only 43 at Zama. the corrupt carthaginian oligarchy was jealous of him but he reformed the system, brought about elections, and set up installment payments so carthage could pay back Rome without completely destroying their economy. The Romans were extremely alarmed at how fast Carthage was getting on her feet and becoming prosperous again under Hannibal, so they demanded Hannibal be sent into exile. They should have been worried, the general that spanked them over and over was a huge threat if carthage got back on her feet. Carthage was basically a defeated client state so it's not like they could refuse.
@TheBacknblack928 жыл бұрын
he didn't just live, he became chief magistrate of Carthage. Hannibal was only 43 at Zama. the corrupt carthaginian oligarchy was jealous of him but he reformed the system, brought about elections, and set up installment payments so carthage could pay back Rome without completely destroying their economy. The Romans were extremely alarmed at how fast Carthage was getting on her feet and becoming prosperous again under Hannibal, so they demanded Hannibal be sent into exile. They should have been worried, the general that spanked them over and over was a huge threat if carthage got back on her feet. Carthage was basically a defeated client state so it's not like they could refuse.
@RickyBobby_USA8 жыл бұрын
Keeping a country poor is still a tactic employed today. Even keeping your citizens poor.
@CampbellMcIntosh8 жыл бұрын
These videos are the best! Keep it up!
@jurjen87038 жыл бұрын
that's some ride of rohirrim shit
@Marcatordu448 жыл бұрын
This is really good video mate : the presentation and the speech are really good ! Continue like that !
@karl_fookin_tanner96058 жыл бұрын
my tiny brain cannot comprehend a 19 year old general leading military campaigns, look at what the 19year olds in this generation are doing...
@ImperatorRom8 жыл бұрын
Think about Alexander, General at 16, King at 20, Emperor at 26, dead at 32 :/
@moonknightish8 жыл бұрын
Scipio was 19 during the Battle of Cannae, but he wasn't a general at the time.
@AnhTrieu908 жыл бұрын
Yes, Scipio was 19 at the Battle of Cannae, and he was just a leader of a unit, not a general. The Battle of Zama happened 14 years after that. So he's 33 at the time.
@malnutritionboy8 жыл бұрын
Johnny Zhu And what the fuck are you doing? you ain't a general boy
@karl_fookin_tanner96058 жыл бұрын
Melting Clocks Looks like I hit someone's sensitive spot
@franzluggin3988 жыл бұрын
Such an entertaining video, again! I wanted to throw in something more unusual, something that might not be covered 1000 times already, as input for what to do next, if you actually wish to continue with something else: The battles of the Thirty Years War, the total shift of focus during the war, a military dominant Sweden, a recently conquered Prague that was held against the Swedish assault that continued until after the final truce was signed.