HMS Prince of Wales construction time-lapse and float-out

HMS Prince of Wales construction time-lapse and float-out (December 2017)
Aircraft Carrier Alliance Video

[@gyuri8515]

Top 3 Mysteries of all time 1. Bermuda Triangle 2. Area 51 3. My youtube recommendations

[@RottenFlesh-we6nu]

Underrated

[@someoneonyouryoutubee2947]

Underrated

[@roifpramudia]

Underrated

[@alan_isvz]

Underrated

[@liachan1472]

Underrated

[@Overneed-Belkan-Witch]

Future generations will see Starship construction time lapse

[@Pheonix-gb6qu]

I’m 13 right now so if I’m still alive too which chances are definitely zero 😂

[@mohamedelhaddade6371]

nah they won't

[@r.sharpe1206]

No

[@EconomyElk]

We will go extinct before we get anywhere near that

[@noobary]

@@EconomyElk Scientists estimate that the earth will die out in 5 billion years

[@daksapramana3860]

When you were sank by the planes in the past, so now you bring planes everywhere you go.

[@9zero187]

Lmao that's harsh

[@4nix591]

Yea, the battleship Prince of Wales was torped by the Japanese off the coast of my country lol

[@professionaldisappointment1654]

@@4nix591 that should teach them ablut the importance of air superiority

[@winniechua4585]

@@4nix591 oh yes singapore was meant to defend it but got sunk on the way back to the uk

[@RNS681]

@@winniechua4585 it wasn’t on its way back to U.K. it just got there

[@nevek20]

Imagine how good it feels to finish one of these ships and see it sailing...

[@luckzo3892]

Then imagine watching it sink or hearing that it got destroyed after spending 2 years on it

[@noelstefanson9600]

I mean or you do like with Vasa skeppet, Gustav Vasas, (greatest swedish King) priced ship. It wasent finished during his lifetime but still sunk on its maiden sailing, but it was all built by hand.

[@FatherDinny]

true

[@JV-bj4kx]

*And German U-406 sinking it*

[@mozartssidepiece9544]

nevek20 sure, but imagine being the unlucky sap that had to drive it and make sure it doesn’t break into quarters in the middle of the sea

[@randomizer3777]

A man has fallen into the river Start building your rescue aircraft carrier

[@professory4320]

HEY!

[@mrp111]

@lynxmehdi68 sail to the rescue

[@yukishi2746]

New AiRCraFt CarrIeR EacH sOld Separately

[@yukishi2746]

LEGO®️

[@avify3369]

Background and noise not included

[@emoclem1579]

Imperial Japanese navy: you again

[@crazywarriorscatfan9061]

I see your a man of culture

[@aaronsanceda4085]

"Im back bitch! And this time history will be turntables"

[@pops7249]

@@aaronsanceda4085 IJN : who are you HMS POW : i bring the name of the ship that you sunk in ww2, now i am here for revenge Time machine in nutshell

[@NukaWorldOverboss]

Shimakaze kill this shit 3×3 610 mm Torpedo byby

[@emoclem1579]

@@aaronsanceda4085 imperial Japanese navy : hold my yamato

[@gingervsginger7305]

THAT'S SOME LARGE ASS LEGO'S

[@clovmations2660]

*HEY!*

[@riemer4589]

See yall again in 10 years when it is in my recommendations again!

[@okman7933]

Riemer I hope I see you make an original comment in 10 years

[@bluefoxy6478]

If.

[@devon5154]

its been 4 months since this comment so this is incorrect *See yall again in 4 months when it is in my recommendations again!*

[@bigjoewld]

@@devon5154*6*

[@mohamedshakaal1545]

F**k You What If We Die and Go To Jannah💕

[@smufr9277]

i seriously don’t believe they built this in 4 minutes and 18 seconds

[@tyrstone3539]

I know right?!! Thats british engineering 4 u

[@clovmations2660]

The UK sure knows how to build

[@deatheye_9764]

They built her faster than them claiming land

[@jaybdub77]

Yeah, took at least 5 min.

[@ton4196]

🤣🤣🤣

[@ConfusedAdmiral]

"Let us not repeat Failure again" - HMS Prince Of Wales

[@filipdrucker4990]

Wdym? What failure?

[@eshkhasderon7769]

Did you mean the battle of Bismarck,prince of Wales and Prinz Eugen and hms hood

[@eshkhasderon7769]

And the prince of Wales sink?

[@Joe-ss9is]

@@eshkhasderon7769 That was actually the Hood, the PoW [Prince of Wales] survived the battle and sank due to air strikes by Japanese planes (I think) alongside the HMS Repulse a couple of years later

[@houraisanproductions5879]

Ahh I see you're a Shikikan of culture as well

[@Soonerfrk11]

As an American, it is very cool to see y’all get your SECOND! I’m not here to bash. Only here to say thank you for building this ship. The U.S. and it’s allies need to remain strong and loyal to each other. The HMS Prince of Wells does just that. Bravo!

[@sfullernj]

Exactly my American friend. Brothers in arms

[@Phianhcr123]

Uk: we just made a really big carrier US: *cute*

[@phoenixwyvern355]

@Ryūjin Grad USS. Iowa: Hi ^.^

[@NanoJakeian]

@@phoenixwyvern355 Japan : HoHo yamatooooo takes 100 Planes to sink

[@lycanthr0py961]

*Laughs in Gerarld Ford*

[@leoa-b8094]

@@lycanthr0py961 laughs in free healthcare rather than excessive amounts of ships

[@madhie-kun8614]

What about KMS Bismarck-chan???

[@Hopesedge]

UK: "And we dub it, the prince of wales" Germany & Japan: *awkward silence* UK: "May it avenge it's predecessor." Germany & Japan: *panik*

[@clovmations2660]

*World War 3 Intensifies*

[@hasanok1964]

The ship's pipes burst. Engine room Off The ship was scrapped. UK: Panik

[@marabouu]

Gopro seller: how many cameras do u want Camera man:yes

[@jaemesuaxie6272]

My fellow shikkikans Assemble.

[@shimrarin2660]

Prince of Wales cv variant XD

[@GM-zk8ge]

i see you are a man of culture as well

[@MyAngelReimu]

SHI~ KI~ KAN!!!~

[@rafael_pinto]

HMS Prince of Wales Retrofit

[@hwpo7834]

I knew I would find AL players here

[@seansabhaois]

Whatever the future holds for Prince of W. & QE these ships are amazing achievements & are fitting tributes to the British men and women who helped to build them. The armchair experts, mostly foreign I gather, will always point out the shortcomings of design and intended purpose. These carriers have largely been built according to British designs, using a range of skills & technologies, both foreign & domestic. Oh yes, not forgetting using Chinese built cranes. (Before some of our foreign friends get their knickers knotted. Just saying 😉👍)

[@SG-hv8wj]

Wait what they have to be british because the same ones are in belfast and they have to be british

[@oddandoddities3885]

Yeah but they're already obsolete

[@somebodyelse5820]

Imagine needing a ramp to launch planes from a diesel aircraft carrier.

[@Joopyter724]

@@somebodyelse5820 it is catapult compatible we are not cavemen and it is a conscious decision to make it a ramp Same with the diesel Just pull your finger out your arse and think for a minute And then piss off and stop complaining about a country the size of a single state having a worse navy than the USA

[@firstordersaint7659]

@@Joopyter724 To be honest I agree, and when they're taking the piss out of us trying to build a new aircraft carrier I say that building two at one time is pretty good especially for an island nation that is the size of a single US state.

[@grahamhaxell239]

Awesome! Really need a third carrier as Ark Royal!

[@chrislewis8714]

While I don't disagree in principle, if more money were made available I would bolster the Frigate and Submarine fleet with it rather than carrier #3.

[@therealunclevanya]

Yes, but, smaller and more like a Royal Marine multi-purpose amphibious assault ship-aircraft carrier similar to the Spanish Juan Carlos I

[@danielwhyatt3278]

More Frigates and subs first, then we can look at another career.

[@patrikpotocki6255]

Would it be called King of Scotland then? To make the trio 😂

[@pizza1540]

We have to make sure shes good at hunting Modern Enemy Destroyers

[@tommycundy]

Say what you want about the Royal Navy and even the capability of these carriers, but this is an engineering triumph - something we should be proud Britain can still accomplish!

[@niuchajianfa6222]

lol and it breaks down

[@tankourito5419]

@@niuchajianfa6222 Pretty much every warship in existence has broken down at some point.

[@niuchajianfa6222]

@@tankourito5419 are you brits? do you really not see the state your country is in?

[@thejeffinvade]

I see it's stealthy already, making mist as it sails.

[@LAV-25A2_56]

Good thing.

[@alexandercarder2281]

That’s just level 4, wait till you see her in level 62.

[@SierraDelta-]

The British weather gives it a 10 percent boost in mist production

[@mistarnoob1495]

Ps: it may encounter a Bismarck in the mist

[@Joopyter724]

The british weather follows it

[@orukuroch.3355]

Wait I thought she was supposed to wear a red uniform and holding a sword?!?!? This video is clearly a lie

[@Monarch683]

Orukuro San I see you are a shikikan of culture as well

[@hanselsihotang]

And she doesn't have a shoulder-length blonde hair too...

[@moekachina5852]

OH C'MON!!!

[@squirtlemaster9390]

Hms Prince of wales is a Battleship or Battlecruiser but it helped Hood to attack Bismarck

[@toadkillerdog4282]

Yeah but they name new ships after old ones.

[@Ferikai0]

Yea they did

[@namespacestd131]

Hms prince of wales was a king george v class battleship, she and hood engaged bismarck and prinz eugen in Battle of Denmark Strait

[@calvinnickel9995]

It was sunk near Hong Kong in 1941.

[@starm1lo384]

@@calvinnickel9995 Fact check: British Malaya, since was pretty sure she and Repulse were sent to Singapore for defensive battles against the Japanese

[@unknown-lr4tx]

KZbin algorithm does it again.

[@Clint_Beastwood87]

tugs are underrated and real mvps since the very beggining of the large ship building.

[@lanefe1]

Another great feat of engineering at Rosyth.

[@johngraham3198]

They. Only. Put. Her. Together. It. Was. mostly. Built. In. Govan and other yards they have never built a ship they need to get that statement right

[@anonymous3700]

J S I'm Scottish and I can assure you no need to worry about us getting Independence until about 2050!

[@anonymous3700]

@M ZAKRIA Yeah I thought there'd be a few problems, since they've built it so fast compared to the HMS Queen Elizabeth.

[@johngraham3198]

It was built on govan and only put together at roysyth they seem to forget that

[@alexandercarder2281]

It was built in the only place great ships 🚢 can be built. Scotland 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

[@KitchenFSink]

Britain: *Starts investing in Royal Navy* Rest of the World: *panik*

[@davidty2006]

Also Britain: has very little ground force. Rest of the World Kalm

[@snuggles3277]

Britain: and after we have built these 2 carriers which are nothing compared to carriers built by the likes of china and the US, we ran out of money so we can't build enough ships/equipment to create a proper carrier strike force :D rest of the world: laughs

[@alexalbrecht5768]

Snuggles China still lacks proper carriers or fighters. Both are outdated Soviet knock offs

[@davidty2006]

@@alexalbrecht5768 mate our British carriers are apparently using F35B's that we could buy a entire Normandy Invasion force for a carrier full of them.

[@alexalbrecht5768]

Davidty 2006 and?

[@qrayka213]

Ilustrious : wales? Prnc of wales : what? Ilustrious. : You so thicc now

[@houraisanproductions5879]

Agreed

[@marktorrez7380]

That was so cool to watch how they put that ship together that was very impressive WOW!!!

[@Afc1987]

I worked on the hms prince of Wales proud to be part of it .i was at that dock yard .

[@gunshipzeroone3546]

Should do the video reverse as we can no longer afford it now and now we only getting half of the f35b.

[@minjaejun2829]

A glimpse recommendation from korea Firstly, I admire your NHS. Your country spends 6% of your whole GNP on NHS, thus providing free healthcare to all citizens. South Korea has a very efficient(but not as good as yours) health care system. If GB manages to make the NHS a bit more efficient, your government can easily fund your carriers

[@arandomyoutuber6634]

@@minjaejun2829 the nhs is fucking shit now. waiting times are forever.. my friend sat in the waiting room for 7 hours with a broken arm. no painkillers at all aswell.

[@harryfisher9922]

ARandomKZbinr yeah the nhs needs more investment by the government but if boris keeps paying millions for his Tory cronies they’ll never see that much needed capital.

[@arandomyoutuber6634]

@@harryfisher9922 I dont see why you are blaming this on Boris. Just because you dont like him doesnt mean he is the cause of all problems. the NHS waiting times and crap has been a big problem for a very long time

[@bulletproofguy5112]

@@minjaejun2829 we can already fund our carriers.

[@nathanr.9507]

I prefer Prince of Wales' previous incarnation

[@nathanr.9507]

I never said the old one was better

[@ingurlund9657]

@Benito Mussolini I'd love the battleship prince of wales. Cover her in missile systems like Reagan did with the iowa battleships in the 80s and she's the ultimate escort. Then when you want entertainment you fire the big guns for guys like me. :)

[@roman648]

We should have kept At least one, HMS (Battleship) from the era. Sad because they’re obsolete now.

[@SG-hv8wj]

Yea

[@leotran9259]

Roman true. They should of at least kept HMS vanguard for tourist which can gain money for the economy instead of scrapping it which just leads to losses economic wise.

[@erikbynum1]

He’s absolutely gorgeous guys!! Shoutout from America!! Keep Charging!!!

[@dc4460]

Impressive maritime engineering build, so much time, effort and skill comes together for the final part when she ties up alongside.

[@splatoonistproductions5345]

She’s honestly a beautiful ship, I one day hope to pluck up the courage and join, maybe one day I can serve on her

[@Andrew-is7rs]

What a beautiful ship

[@thesillyseal284]

Not as beautiful as china. Long live China.

[@apleknight411]

the silly seal okay buddy

[@thesillyseal284]

@@apleknight411 china has(is) big gay.

[@esdsohx1196]

@@thesillyseal284 is*

[@thesillyseal284]

@@esdsohx1196 no fuck that I'm gonna correct a sentence that has the word "china" in it.

[@johnriggenbach2999]

Awesome video....thank you...

[@shafiulalam1698]

Thanks everyone for their hard work

[@STEERCARTEL]

Video upload in January. KZbin : NO. . After 10 months. KZbin : This is it chief.

[@ronc9413]

Amazing how something so big can be constructed in sections and then the pieces fit exactly together. Wonder what would happen if there was a discrepancy of say 1-2 in deck or hull plating between sections?

[@pritibeohar2774]

Ronald Chan good

[@pritibeohar2774]

Ronald Chan right

[@Then.72]

That’s what happens when you learn Mechanical engineering & get your Advanced city & guilds

[@shipchannel9893]

great video

[@Azaelys1237]

I find this very satisfying to watch

[@yannik3452]

Looks nice in fog

[@alexandercarder2281]

That’s the ships cloaking mechanism.

[@watt6248]

"Wait, is that how they make boats?" "Always has been."

[@endyender1703]

From the mist, a shape, a ship is taking form!

[@aldrinmilespartosa1578]

Us: we have the state of the art electro-magnetic catapults, do you need it ? England: nah im good

[@bulletproofguy5112]

The uk had state of the art electric launch system in development already, we would have used that.

[@StewartWalker-hy1eo]

@@bulletproofguy5112 the Yanks think they are the Gods of carrier technology but when they discover that they only copied the UK and made the vessel larger and then but stupid nuclear reactors onboard they get upset. But the UK invented the steam catapult, angled deck , Optical Landing System , armoured deck, first welded carrier, STOVL , Radar & started the electric launch system called EMKITS/EMCAT

[@makethatabakersdozen9655]

Beautiful British engineering 😢

[@blitz2973]

"How many times do we have to teach you this old man" Some ijn ship idk lmao

[@Yamatry]

I like the Battleship more. But this one is also pretty cool!

[@user-wy4ug5wo4x]

Does this ship sink at once after being hit by an ammunition dump?

[@silvergemteam]

argentine air force in the background* ok i can do it

[@antonytye3484]

do what? actually take off? last time there were two aircraft carriers in the area they didnt do anything to them and these will be more powerful. with stealth jets not harriers and type 45 destroyers, Argentinas poxy underfunded air force that has hardy changed since that humiliating surrender to a smaller force, wouldnt get near them, another quick and easy victory, not that you could take the islands anyway, they are actually defended now, those 4 typhoons could decimate argentinas entire air force and the there are 1000s of troops stationed there not 60.

[@kurousagi8155]

The Argentine Airforce is in pretty poor condition. They’ve only got 36 converted A-4ARs as fighters and 27 IA-63 ground attack jet aircraft in inventory. Their readiness rates are pretty bad since Argentina’s military budget is about on par per capita in comparison to other Latin American nations, but their personnel pay is much higher.

[@silvergemteam]

antony tye they atack the HMS invencible 2 times with crapy planes edit:s

[@silvergemteam]

Kuro Usagi they got more than that like you know SEM the same plane upgraded (and not coverted) think what they can do only think if the old version of the plane the SUE hit the invencible, imagine what the SEM s can do

[@antonytye3484]

@@silvergemteam They didn`t sink HMS Invincible though did they, failed attacks against an old aircraft carrier nearly 40 years ago is no basis for confidence in success now, with an updated version of a 70s aircraft, and that is your reason for saying "Think what they can do, only think" like its so much that we cant even imagine the power of these updated 70s jets and should be in awe. The Type 45 destroyer can track 100s of tennis ball sized objects simultaneously, and the Jets on these carriers are completely new and radical, they are stealth jets with BVR capability, that can pass their fired rockets to another jet to control and another, the Falklands is manned with 1000s of troops and Radar systems, with a full islands comms network and nearly all the local men are now trained reserves of the Falkland Island Defense Force, there are 4 Typhoon/Eurofighters on the Island which can be boosted by many many more(even if the carriers just transport them down and off load them), Submarines and warships permanently on enrollment in the region and prior warning is a certainty as is the political will to defend, all these things were not there before, and you still couldn`t hold the islands when you had a military junta with the military controlling budgets. This time you couldn`t take them never mind hold them. You live in cloud cuckoo land if you think those old junkers could get near one of these, why would anyone even have a carrier if such old aircraft can destroy them with such ease that you profess?

[@badaladaladala8662]

May God bless her PRINCE Of Wales

[@worldman3218]

Warships are usually referred to as feminine. It's naval tradition dating back from the beginning of the colonial era.

[@worldman3218]

@Jonny Sandtrap dude are you high!?

[@calvinnickel9995]

@ Johnny Sandtrap You do realize that the colonial era predates US independence and that they were _your_ colonies. Admiralty Law doesn’t govern anything regarding what pronoun ships are referred to by.

[@cyanoticspore676]

@Jonny Sandtrap *Why are you talking like this* ?

[@whyyoumadbro2370]

World Man Except Bismarck, the only warship to be referred to as 'he'

[@danielbrown5008]

Right weird thing is i was in air cadets and went to rosyth where this was being made nd it was so cool to look out the window every night watching them build this it was just outstanding

[@LinkTheFusky]

such an awesome building timelapse then... Comilla comes

[@viceversa5197]

Glory to the Queen, makes me proud.

[@SpaceMonkeyBoi]

Britain sure knows their boats.

[@deciodepaulamachado5527]

Uma arte a construção deste barco ... para a guerra e para a paz ...

[@dodyhulkprawato]

Wow, beautiful

[@ussvincent1119]

What if there was a carrier named the Hood II

[@alexwright6816]

Hood ll electric boogaloo

[@mrridley8967]

The name Hood was been struck due to the fate of the battlecruiser hood. No new ship can be called hood as a sign of respect to the crew that where lost and the ship.

[@lifesimulator3964]

USSVincent 11 Nah, just call it “Hoodie”

[@mrridley8967]

@@lifesimulator3964 that could work

[@archiescriven6178]

No what we need is HMS Boaty Mcboatface

[@danielwhyatt3278]

Wait a minute! I didn’t know she has already been christened? I mean, I knew she’d already begun basic trials but still!👍🏼 NICE

[@djjoniej.jimenez7142]

What a huge aircraft carrier ship!!! I amazed the way it filmed with a fog. A Scary ship.

[@michaelgodbee122]

Does building ships like that cut construction time

[@alexandercurtis4427]

Man, If only you guys still had the old one (or any of your battleships for that matter)

[@someguynamedav7947]

Alexander Curtis man it hurts to know that even the Warspite didn’t escape the fate of being scraped ( She did try to escape though )

[@SG-hv8wj]

Do you mean for a musain because I agree

[@Chris-m-m02]

@@someguynamedav7947 warspite was in such a bad state that saving her wouldve been 10x harder then actually scrapping her, yes it is a shame that she was scrapped but preserving such a large vessel is very expensive and we should be thankful that even a light cruiser survived (belfast)

[@davidsmith3919]

What a beauty

[@ryanm.191]

The sheer size of this thing is incredible

[@jman42s]

It’s amazing how long ships take to build even in the modern day.

[@bennytsb5719]

The channel is called ‘save the royal navy’ but there’s nowhere to dock both carriers at one time!

[@Theocurrie]

GamingVlogs I don’t think strategically you would want to have two of your big naval assets in one place at the same time, they would be like sitting ducks.

[@Alucard-gt1zf]

GamingVlogs Plymouth can sock both at the same time...... sorry to tell you that and also while not military Dover would also be able to dock both

[@SG-hv8wj]

Yea were not amrica we dont want a pearl harbour

[@user-re1dg1xm7b]

Aghhh i'm late 1 year later to know this vid exits

[@Iamthefriendlyguy]

Bruh Im two years late ;-;

[@lepiper]

Bruh

[@greycatturtle7132]

Amazing

[@maximilianhoch2508]

Actually saw either queen elizabeth or prince of whales under construction from a distance when I visited Scotland, not a bad sight :)

[@entprizegaming4693]

God bless the royal navy

[@Jude19]

What a beauty! Hopefully one day my country can have a ship like this, Tamil Eelam ❤

[@SerialSnowmanKiller]

Kinda strange to name an aircraft carrier after a battleship, but I dig it. Beautiful ship.

[@jim2lane]

I have a question. At 1:12 it shows a tugboat pulling the stern section into the drydock. My question is, how did the tug then get back out of the drydock? 🤔

[@admiralmallard7500]

Fair point. Probably had to rethink that manuver

[@matth2kk]

I don't even know what I'm doing here I have a math test tomorrow

[@xolove0024]

Now we need HMS Hood Aircraft Carrier

[@mrridley8967]

Hood as a name has be struck due to the fate of the battlecruiser hood. No new ship can bestow the name Hood as a sign of respect to the lost crew and the ahip

[@CompatibilityMadness]

@@mrridley8967 I give Brits few hundred to a thousand years, and they will name new ship "Hood". In name of the ship that went down in WW2 of course. It's simply a matter of perspective.

[@juanbrea6267]

@@CompatibilityMadness bi

[@SG-hv8wj]

Why like why do we need one I dont get it like why dose it have to be called hood why not vengeance or endeavour

[@SG-hv8wj]

@@mrridley8967 Mayer prince of wales sunk and a lot of men on her died and on many other ships we have today so ur wrong their

[@nozyspy4967]

I dunno, there's something about this way of building ships out of giant Lego blocks that lacks soul, its very clinical. Seeing old photos of ships rising off the slipway as a skeleton then being sheathed in steel is much more beautiful to behold.

[@admiralmallard7500]

Very impressive

[@pakinpoolkaew3933]

From WW2 battleship to revived aircraft carrier

[@PatrickPanzerschreck]

I expected a other Prince of Wales which got me wondering why this video looks so modern😂

[@ssamm1608]

I expected it to be a reconstruction of the previous HMS Prince of Wales which was the ship that was sinked by the Bismarck back in WWII

[@PatrickPanzerschreck]

@@ssamm1608 Prine of Wales didn't sink. It accompanied the HMS Hood which got struck by a magazine detonation through Bismarck. The HMS Prince of Wales got away.

[@ssamm1608]

@@PatrickPanzerschreck oh right sorry i got it confused with the hood😂

[@PatrickPanzerschreck]

@@ssamm1608 😂😅

[@Wessex90]

The irony of an aircraft carrier being given the same name is that the WWII battleship HMS Prince Of Wales was sunk by Japanese air attack in the South China Sea just after Pearl Harbour 😔.

[@thesouthforlife]

Now that is a cool battle boat

[@zyadaldafoor6123]

What's the music called/name?

[@Radictor44]

The UK is AWAKENING - Once again becoming a global world leader!

[@Steve-gc5nt]

We never stopped. Granted we use soft power these days but we've never not been influential. Even with the god awful politicians we've had the last few decades.

[@giorgosgeorgiou8501]

I Like... 🇨🇾🇨🇾🇨🇾🇨🇾🇨🇾🇨🇾

[@eduardolteanu6847]

Haha look at you Cypriots😂😂 You only have onions 😂😂

[@ok_255]

@@eduardolteanu6847 Stfu,commie piggy xD

[@giorgosgeorgiou8501]

@@eduardolteanu6847 Έχουμε ότι θέλεις φίλε μου... 🇨🇾🇨🇾🇨🇾🇨🇾🇨🇾🇨🇾🇨🇾🇨🇾🇨🇾

[@giorgosgeorgiou8501]

@@eduardolteanu6847 Έχουμε και σιουσιουκο της βρακας φίλε μου... 🇨🇾🇨🇾🇨🇾🇨🇾🇨🇾🇨🇾🇨🇾🇨🇾🇨🇾🇨🇾🇨🇾🇨🇾

[@giorgosgeorgiou8501]

@@ok_255 🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗

[@sawfather06]

Holy crap that thing is huge I wonder if it has the magnetic catapult like the newest us carrier

[@Dan-di2qj]

Nope, the F35-B doesn't need one, although it has apparently been build with the option to fit one later if needed.

[@arghyahazra5597]

Salute to the workers

[@chonkyboiwithamustacheanda257]

Prince of Wales!? _Azur lane?_

[@posu1882]

I see you're a man of culture aswell.

[@PatrickPanzerschreck]

@@posu1882 This is getting out of hand, now there are two of them...

[@khuutznetsov]

Silence degenerate, I may be American, but this fine piece of British engineering is better than any "anime tiddies" you may feast your eyes on

[@chonkyboiwithamustacheanda257]

@@khuutznetsov Are you white?

[@weebpatrol448]

5oviet shush normies

[@buster117]

China: hold my supersonic missile

[@jonathancorbyn8203]

Prine of Wales:Hold my sea ceptor missile.

[@esdsohx1196]

UK: hold my intercontinental ballistic shit.

[@alexwilson9682]

Great music

[@chriskaer]

impressive.

[@aprplayercat7762]

Wait isn't That HMS Queen Elizabeth What the heck

[@adamgriffin8197]

AprPlayer Cat sister ship of HMS Queen Elizabeth

[@igorvyacheslavtherussianmu3142]

THEIR ARE TWO CARRIERS IN UK ONE QUEEN ELIZABETH AND THE OTHER PRINCE OF WALES

[@SG-hv8wj]

They are different ships of the same class or more simply pw is a clone of qe

[@yungstallion2201]

Uk: we have the third best carriers in the world, our mighty navy is back Us: I have 11 of the 1st and second best Uk: then are you winning son? Us: yes dad I’m winning

[@jonomoth2581]

@mohamad ikram it's not to do with royalty, it's going by the fact that most Americans are descended from European emigrants, of that a large share British. Also with the fact that Britain ruled the colonies before the war of independence and America speaks English. although a lot has changed Britain is America's closest cultural ancestor

[@fumikonakazawayugumu6119]

I confused this with the Battleship HMS Prince of wales from the title but i was confused at first because it looks so modern and then i realized that they meant the Aircraft Carrier

[@pedrooyarvide7426]

Woow q navío para más grande, es un portaaviones?

[@assintec]

Brasil tem tudo para construção de belos navios comerciais e militares. É uma pena política corrupta em nosso país.

[@SG-hv8wj]

?

[@alex_nemo_]

Большому кораблю - большая торпеда. 😈

[@slav4111]

Или пкр=)

[@jean-marccousin9367]

Un Légo géant!

[@duckmaneuvers]

I like the "aircraft carrier" label sticked to the side of the stern as if it's like a scale model part sold separately from a hobby shop lol

[@gonzalezag]

*Takes years of making* *Sails for an hour and sinks* The one construction worker: oops I forgot to put in the last screw...

[@justaglitch9387]

Lol

[@TrangleC]

You'd think that even modern military ships would get a little more armor than those 1 inch thick steel plates they make civilian ships out of. I thought they would at least put some torpedo protection bulks over the regular hull, or something. This is basically just a regular container ship with an aircraft hangar on top. Can't even compare it to a modern oil tanker, because those have double-hulls and thus probably a better chance to survive a torpedo hit or even just a collision.

[@TrangleC]

@123 456 They are still pretty much helpless, not just against modern submarines, but also against mines and a bunch of stuff coming through the air. Anti ship mines evolved too, since WW2. They aren't some cartoonish looking steel ball with spikes, swimming through the water or being tethered to the ocean floor with chains anymore. They sit on the ocean floor and are basically undetectable and even if the carrier's support fleet could move slow and methodical enough to search the whole ocean floor in front of the fleet by sonar, which they can't, all they would see is some barrel shaped object laying around. You can't evade every piece of junk laying around with your war fleet and you can't stop the fleet every time there is some old crude oil barrel laying around, to blow it up, even if you could constantly search the ocean floor. Modern subs are basically just as impossible to detect and stop. Not just the most modern Swedish, German or Dutch high tech super submarines manage regularly to evade all detection and counter measures during war games and exercises, but even diesel-electric submarines from developing countries have successfully snuck up on US carrier groups repeatedly. I once read an article about some 40 year old Chilean submarine unexpectedly surfacing in the middle of a carrier group. There is a declassified, old informational film about submarine hunting made by the US Navy available on KZbin. In that they all but admit that it is next to impossible to find a submarine, unless the sub makes dumb mistakes or is in such bad mechanical shape that the propellers start making undue noise, but even then it can be hard, depending on the surroundings. That video is old, from the late 60s or early 70s, but the principles explained in it haven't changed. No new ways of searching for submarines have been added to the cook book since then. Sure, submarine hunting equipment got better, but so did the submarines. There is a reason for why people say that in the ocean, there is only submarines and targets. And then there are new torpedoes. That new German torpedo has a 100 mile range, all electrical propulsion, which basically makes it totally quiet and undetectable, can receive satellite guidance, has some fancy new sonar that apparently can not only detect a surface vessel by the noise small waves make when they hit the hull, but even tell how big the target is and can make pretty good, educated guesses what kind of ship it is, just from that. And it has some advanced artificial intelligence algorithm stuff going on, which enables it to understand when somebody tries to fool it with counter measures. Apparently it can also operate in ambush mode, basically mimicking a mine. Its long range allows it to do more than just run straight at a target, like any other torpedo, but it can make outright attack plans and maneuver smartly to get to the target. It can determine where the target is moving, then run parallel to it, overtake it, loop around and put itself into the path of the target and then play dead and sink to a certain depth to wait there till the target runs over it, to attack it from below and shenanigans like that. I assume other modern torpedoes will be able of doing similar things, even though that German one to my knowledge is the only one yet that has an all electric propulsion and that kind of range.

[@bennytsb5719]

Also it’s far more than an inch of reinforced steel, it has got basic protection and shielding along with modern sensors and a fleet of support.

[@messerschmittbolkow5606]

You are so right, they should have build in this capacitor like active protection like the US did in some of their ships.

[@TrangleC]

@@bennytsb5719 Sorry about the delayed response, but I never got a notification about your comment. You can clearly see what the ship is made of in this video. There are no reinforcements and it definitely is just a single sheet of thin steel. There is no magical wonder steel that is way stronger than the regular rolled steel sheets they make any civilian ship out of. The best steels that exist currently are powder steels and they are maybe 10 to 15% tougher than regular steel and very, very expensive, which is why they are currently only used for small, important parts of aircraft and medical equipment like MRE machines and stuff like that. That ship would probably have cost 4 to 5 times as much as it did, if they would have built it out of powder steel. Hardly worth the money for a 15% increase in material performance, especially since whoever constructed this ship obviously didn't care enough about making it tough to even give it a double hull, like on an oil tanker.

[@TrangleC]

@@messerschmittbolkow5606 What capacitor like active protection? Never heard of it and I don't see how a capacitor could do anything to protect a ship from torpedoes or sea mines.

[@andrewgraham6006]

Wish these vids were a thing for older ships would’ve loved to see construction / repair of warspite Yorktown or Yamato In hd

[@alxndrmzksm8387]

When are we getting a new HMS Illustrious?