Horizon Forbidden West - PS5 Pro vs RTX 4090 - 4k 60 FPS

[@DsLmaNiaC]

This is a video comparison of the Horizon Forbidden West between the most expensive console at the moment and the most expensive graphics card. The game is no Cyberpunk like heavy and it performs greatly on both systems, although it is more detailed and way more fluid as expected on the PC. The issue I have is it does not seem to be totally optimized since as you can see in the into some flowers pop up out of nowhere while this is not an issue on the OG PS5 or on the PS5 Pro. Like or share if you do like the video, consider subscribing for more gaming content and walkthroughs! Thank you for watching!

[@NextgenPL]

Brah hdr settings better set on PC as well as color balance what makes PC looks more appealing but in fact PC is just sharper 😅

[@jacooosthuizen3593]

HDR on consoles are just better.

[@oOFabSleehOo]

For the price and the little difference between the 2 machines, I much prefer the PS5 pro. The gap between these 2 worlds is getting thinner and thinner now, the video speaks for itself.

[@DsLmaNiaC]

In Horizon Forbidden West yes it's thinner than in other games. But there is huge difference on most of them.

[@xenogears5177]

@@DsLmaNiaC For 3x the price of a console that's already considered overpriced, i would hope it would make a difference. lol

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@@xenogears5177 Of course it does. Even the RTX 4070 does make a great difference vs the Pro.

[@apache8165]

Yes the gap is getting thinner. To buy a PC. Your ps5 pro costs 920 with disc. It cant do 4k its 1440p. A gaming 4k pc with 7900xt will cost you less than 1100. You decide😅

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@apache8165 a 4070 can do.

[@nicolascr181]

Guys, I prefer how it looks like on PS5 pro

[@DsLmaNiaC]

It's because the video was recorded via the capture card with more saturated colors. It is definitely missing details and around 40 fps which you cannot watch in KZbin videos since the videos are capped at 60 fps.

[@wingedhussar1453]

Lightning is better and it's not just colirs

[@DsLmaNiaC]

No, it's the saturation, the brightness and the contrast. I check the original recording and it's much better looking than this, in fact it's brighter than the one from the PS5 Pro. Maybe it has something to do with the way Davinci processed the two videos. The first video came from a capture card the other straight from the game on PC. Besides you are missing the point here. Pause at any moment, see the difference in detail and resolution. Everything is more blurry on the PS5 Pro. I may consider to reupload the video once I find out what is wrong with it.

[@wingedhussar1453]

@@DsLmaNiaC i see beter lightning on beging

[@kylemonteza9192]

same

[@TheDiabloZero]

Wow, just the fact that the PS5 Pro is being compared to a 4090 is already a huge leap for consoles.Personally I like the way the ambient light looks in warmer tones on the 5 Pro.And to think that there are still people who say that there are no differences between the standard PS5 and the Pro version, of course there are and they are quite significant. Thanks for sharing

[@DsLmaNiaC]

That is a mistake on my part, it looks better on the RTX 4090 on the original videos but they both look great on the OLED. This game is a prime example of how games should be on the consoles from now on. I mean if you cannot give us good raytracing performance give us that.

[@alvinamana1459]

Not really thats just them showing its to a high end pc. IF I compare an electric bike to a car doesnt mean they are close I could just show you how it looks like compared to a car. The ps5 pro can't even run this at real 4k lmfao how are they gonna compare fake 4k to real 4k? Its just s side by side and its on youtube so unless you pause it to look at details in the 4090 that are taken out of the ps5 pro you can't see the quality difference.

[@alvinamana1459]

Also the differences are actually very minor. They even stated it mostly improve performance. minor ray tracing that the ps5 had just shows up little bit better and shadows that isn't significant that's turning on one minor setting that if turned on impacts your fps anyway.

[@doudymac]

For the price of the 4090, I'll take a PS5 Pro, a 55" OLED TV and a decent surround sound system. 👍

[@DsLmaNiaC]

Yes you can or you can get a cheaper PC.

[@doudymac]

@@DsLmaNiaC True. But with a $700 budget I don't think I can match the PS5 Pro.

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@doudymac you can with a bit more . Besides the price in Europe is 800 euro and if you add the drive and the stand it goes up to 950. For that price or around that price you can build.a better PC. And I am not bashing either system. Anyone can but whatever he likes, if you are happy with what you purchased I am OK with that. But I am telling it like it is.

[@johnpsy4129]

@@DsLmaNiaC No u cant bulid a pc for the same price stop capping.

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@johnpsy4129 it depends on the region you live at and if you are going for used parts or not. The cost of the full Playstation package in Euripe is around 950 euros so you can build a PC for that price or around that price.

[@danielweiss4498]

if a PS5 pro console on KZbin in 4K is no longer distinguishable from an rtx4090 that says a lot

[@DsLmaNiaC]

It is. Clearly.

[@Abduraghmaan17]

People laughed at the PS5 Vs PS5 Pro comparisons, well now you see the differences even with a 4090 aren't really noticeable either 😂

[@daniramdani5038]

no need to upgrade, stick with your og ps5, you won't see the diffrerent 😂😂

[@DsLmaNiaC]

The difference is not minimal. In this game the PS5 Pro is doing pretty well and is still far behind. Please do not mislead people. It is a very good 700 dollars piece of tech and that is it.

[@Abduraghmaan17]

​@@DsLmaNiaCit's not generational because games peaked around PS4/5 you wouldn't be missing out on anything anymore going forward

[@kulickla]

@@DsLmaNiaCthe difference is basically none

[@OG_Daz]

What is the point in this comparison? $700 console vs a $3-4K PC. To be fair, it really doesn’t much look better on the 4090. I’m sure it is, but the difference is small enough to negate the need for this comparison

[@dandy20ana]

surprising that it's the magic of 100% optimization eh?

[@DsLmaNiaC]

The point of the comparison is not to bash one or the other system. It is to show the differences. I wish I had a 4070 to set up a more even and fair comparison.

[@dandy20ana]

@@DsLmaNiaC You wish you had 4070, ok then I'll get you one then I get your 4090. Problem solved

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@@dandy20ana What I actually meant is I wish I had a 4070 also so I can post a better comparison to similarly price products, my second PC only runs a 3060. But thank you for the proposition and for commenting.:)

[@dandy20ana]

@@DsLmaNiaC no no no.. too late for the I'm on my way getting the 4070 and heading next to your house

[@pietroscarpa2384]

The white balance on the 4090 is messed up, everything looks green.

[@DsLmaNiaC]

Yes, maybe I overdid it with the brightness, because I changed nothing else. It's probably on me.

[@pietroscarpa2384]

Otherwise the game looks pretty identical. You can probably play it at a much higher fps on the 4090.

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@@pietroscarpa2384 There is more detail and a better resolution along with the around 100 fps you get on native 4k. If you pause and check you can see it. About the colors, maybe it's something I did, maybe it's something about davinci resolve that does not work with both videos the same way, the original videos I recorded look different and way better.

[@binhnham2512]

@@DsLmaNiaC I definitely see a lot more detail on the 4090 than the ps5 pro. It just looks much more crisp and sharp. I'm sure the difference is an even wider gap seeing it in person than on a video in KZbin. I have both the 4090 and PS5 pro myself, but I don't have the same games on each system to compare. Thanks for showing the comparison. I've been trying to see the difference between my PS5 and PS5 pro, but there isn't a way for me to play them side by side. In most games I barely see a difference. Framerate is the biggest difference I see so far. Hopefully the list of games will get bigger for optimized games or maybe the biggest impact will be in future games.

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@binhnham2512 frames are the most crucial though. Playing at 60 fps should be the minimum today. That is why I disagree with the developers still offering a 30 fps mode.

[@Hiiiiiiiiiiy]

I fucking love this game. It took the place of Kingdom Hearts as my number two most favorite games in terms of lore and story of all time.

[@DsLmaNiaC]

I loved the first one and Alloy's theme always hits me. I haven't completed the second one because I thought it looked awful on the OG PS5 and I just cannot stand 30 fps mode.

[@joaocharro1576]

But is fixed now, the performance mode is great ​@@DsLmaNiaC

[@SpoonyOrbit]

optimization vs some extra pretty. console will always win with optimization

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@SpoonyOrbit that has to do with each game though and this one is doing great on the Pro.

[@xMikeDezzyx421]

The new tech in the ps5pro is amazing, definitely fighting above its weight class, and didnt even change the cpu.

[@DsLmaNiaC]

Yes and no. It still has issues with raytracing but I love the console.

[@wingedhussar1453]

Lmao ps5 pro has better light ing and shaders. Wtf

[@DsLmaNiaC]

You are too quick and eager to jump into conclusions. The clips have been altered for the same amount of brightness, contrast and saturation yet they produced different outcome so maybe this is my fault. Both versions look great like I stated, the game is very easy to run, the game is well optimized for the PS5. If you want I can post a Cyberpunk full path tracing video and then we can talk about shaders and performance for the 2000 system vs the PS5 Pro, so you can see the real differences.

[@OG_Daz]

It has better HDR thanks to garbage Microsoft

[@Gustaviustwinkelberry]

@@DsLmaNiaC from your experience, did the game look better on pc or console? Sometimes some graphical effects get lost in translation when a game gets ported to pc unfortunately...

[@DsLmaNiaC]

​@@Gustaviustwinkelberry Definitely the PC is the way to go. This is my opinion and please know I love both systems. The PS5 Pro is the best way to experience console games, especially if your whole library is on the PS store or you just want to turn on the console and play and is certainly at least 200 euros or dollars cheaper than any PC you can build with similar specs. There are some issues I cannot overlook though. First the cpu is really old compared to even a Ryzen 5600, that means it will hold games from running at 60 fps with full effects even if the graphics card can support them. Secondly, the gpu is not that competent for today's AAA games, especially in the raytracing or pathtracing sector, which is the way to go in several games today and will only increase as time passes by. An RTX 4070 even with the 5600 on blows the PS5 Pro out of the water but it will cost a bit more. Finally, the cost of the games and the subscription. While you can get a lot of games on physical or digital forms, even on very low prices or on sale, you are still depending on just Sony and its pricing and on top of that you have to pay the subscription too. On the PC, you get unlimited amount of games for free or for a very low price.

[@mrX666-s9p]

@@DsLmaNiaC Cope and sethe imagine paying 2k for a gpu to get owned by console

[@JavierArochoVega]

How can this just happened??? The Pro looks better in few scenes!!!😵

[@DsLmaNiaC]

No it does not. You can pause every scene and look at the details, even with the youtube compression it is obvious.

[@JavierArochoVega]

@ It’s something with the warmer color thing!!! I checked well and indeed the 4090 surpass it in most scenes, but not in all of them!!!

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@@JavierArochoVega Yes it is. It's on my end, I should have worked more on the color correction.

[@JavierArochoVega]

@ Do you think that in a 7800XT will look better than on the PS5 Pro and will have better frame rate???

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@JavierArochoVega raster performance with fsr3 or xess which is better and frame generation will be certainly better even in games with raytracing but it seems that the Pro had a better performance in ray tracing because it may have some features from from RDNA4 which 7800xt is missing or just does not have yet. I mostly had AMD cards in the past up until the 5700xt but since the 3000 series launch i always go for Nvidia. They are just better and more fully featured.

[@XCaPTainClipzX]

1:33 Colors on the pro look much more realistic imo. Now ask yourself this, do these minimal differences between the pro and a 4090 justify the $3000+ price tag of a 4090 build?

[@DsLmaNiaC]

Again, there are not minimal differences and it is one game that is not even heavy enough to push the hardware. 60 fps on performance mode vs 100 fps in native 4k is not minimal. Sony has done a great job in Horizon and the God of War games but they are optimized for the Playstation and feature no raytracing implementation. The colors are an issue of the video encoding procedure.

[@XCaPTainClipzX]

. Would you say these differences between the pro and a 4090 are worth the extra $2300 ?

[@TJones4L]

@@XCaPTainClipzX there are enough differences in a 4070 and a pro, no reason to even go up to a 4090

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@XCaPTainClipzX given the outcome you can get in games and the fact they you can play anything with all the sliders to the right yes. No hardware should cost that much but this is the reality. I would just simply say that I would go for a 4070 super or 4070 super ti PC, that difference would make more sense. The point is the video is not to bash either system though.

[@Imposter001]

Theres a big difference your just watching on youtube. If you ever get to experience a 4090 you would understand

[@1stoptech]

I prefer to pay 700 than 4000 just to play games. Thats a scam

[@DsLmaNiaC]

Anything can be considered a scam. Even the 700.

[@giogamer4825]

Ps5 Pro is impressive. Have this game on the Pro, but needs to complete Horizon 1 Remastered first

[@aichan5235]

yea i'd save the $3000+ and get a $700 console lol. I dont see much of a difference.

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@aichan5235 you got a point, I would still go for a PC on the same amount of money, but it is a game that is not pretty heavy and is very optimized for the Playstation and it looks great. If you try something with full raytracing or path tracing you will realize why you spend the extra amount of money.

[@aichan5235]

@DsLmaNiaC if a rtx 4090 build didnt cost too dammm much, sure. People have money to pull on a $700 unit, people dont have thousands to spend on a high end pc. I never cared for ray tracing. I only always cared about fps.

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@aichan5235 I agree but all I am saying is using Horizon Forbidden West to disregard a PC build is not realistic. Using Cyberpunk 2077, Alan Wake II, the Witcher 3, Hogwarts Legacy and basically the games with heavy raytracing is the way to do it. And besides this is not about rtx 4090 vs PS5 pro. I just happen to own them and thought I should make some videos about it just to see how much difference there is. You can make a 4070 build and will still look better than the Pro.

[@dez1820]

I platinum’d HFB on PS5 at 60fps playing it again now on PC with a 4080 Super at ~135fps.. looks close in quality but prefer that higher framerate without compromising image quality

[@DsLmaNiaC]

Good job. There is really no comparison.

[@Hypergangnam]

4090 rig running native 4k is obviously going to look better than a PS5 Pro running performance mode. But the difference was less than expected. Lets not forget. A 4090 rig cost x3 of the PS5 Pro. I would love to see a comparison in a game where the PS5 utilizes PSSR to the fullest. Should be interesting.

[@peterparker5484]

Why the pc version is little bit green filterred ? Ps5 have better colors or it is only settings ….

[@DsLmaNiaC]

It is the way davinci resolve read and exported the videos. There is a green tint in both versions.

[@RR-lb6mr]

4090 definitely is better but the Pro isn't even bad at all, looks really fantastic.

[@jordanh9501]

The fidelity is clearer on the 4090, which is to be expected, but for the price the Pro is doing just fine. Plus why does everyone look like they have jaundice in on the PC version?

[@ProjectStorm]

For those who think PS5 Pro looks better…I ask, why does the Pro image look so pinkish? Look carefully. It’s not natural. Also, anytime the settings for either system are not shown at the start of the video, something might be off. It would be appreciated. No hate, just sayin. Respect for taking time to make this though. I could be wrong.

[@DsLmaNiaC]

The footage is taken from the console running on performance pro mode and the PC running on 4k native DLAA. For some reason the colors are off although I applied the same settings to both, I may reupload but I think anyone that does not just want to take a side can see what this is about.

[@KIGamin_]

Simple answer. Windows HDR is garbage. Everyone knows that lol

[@ProjectStorm]

@@DsLmaNiaC Got you. I know exactly what you mean. Good vid. I too have a 4090 and made vids comparing it to Series X. This is why I tuned in and dropped a like. The quality of the vid is clean but I was wondering if the color accuracy was perfect or not. I will be checking for more of these vids for sure. Some people are out here trying to trick us with Biased intent. I appreciate you keeping it REAL. Much respect! Oh and I like the colors of the 4090 image as the sunset/sunrise lighting seems natural to me. This is why these videos are fun.

[@miggies8140]

Its actually windows HDR thats broken and looks incorrect, so it infact looks worse and blown out.

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@miggies8140 not only that it s something wrong during the encoding process. The game looks great on the Oled.

[@drunkndrivr]

What I notice is the PSSR resolving during movement, compared to the 4090 (is DLSS on?). 4090 is noticeably sharper during movement, with higher res over all. However, the PS5 pro definitely punches far, far above its weight class here

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@@drunkndrivr yes, the Rtx 4090 is running at native 4k with DLAA.

[@blackmy01]

This game does not use PSSR, but instead uses a custom upscaler built by Gorilla Games, specifically for PS hardware. Watch the Digital Foundry video where they discuss the amazing image quality of Forbidden West.

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@@blackmy01 Awesome job indeed.

[@drunkndrivr]

@@blackmy01 that's actually good news then, considering maybe PSSR resolve better

[@raphaelnemenzo265]

both would really look identical tbh until you start seeing the framerate graph running....

[@DsLmaNiaC]

No they would not.

[@kennethwilliams9668]

I have done this comparison with my 4090 and ps5pro. At the exact same time on two lg cx side by side. One a 77in and a 55in. The difference is literally night and day. The fps and detail in the image of the 4090 is light years ahead, i tell you no lie. It is not even close. The fidelity mode on the pro which runs 30 fps, does not touch the graphical fidelity of the 4090, and the 4090 is doing it at 120 frames. The performance mode on the ps5 looks like trash to get to 60 frames, so there is not even a fight there. The pop-in is another issue of its own on the ps5pro, which is not present on the 4090. These two should not be mentioned in the same sentence. The console is good for what it is. But it is far, and i mean far, surpassed by the 4090. I keep telling people that Fidelity is useless at 30 frames. The moment you move on screen is smears and becomes ugly. Superior graphics must be combined with good fps, or else you get a bad experience......

[@DsLmaNiaC]

Exactly my point. But we need to make everything a vs and somehow call the Ps5 pro a giant killer when it cannot really be better than a 4070.

[@kennethwilliams9668]

@DsLmaNiaC I would say 4060 at best, the quality of the image is good but it's still well behind. Like I was saying it doesn't matter how good the image is, if you get sick trying to play it or it's a blurry mess. That's the only problem with consoles, the power is not there for good frames. Which is 70% of the gaming experience.

[@binhnham2512]

Based on many of these comments, you might want to go back and re-edit your video for proper color correction on the PC. I assume the PS5 pro or 4090 have nothing to do with quality of colors as it just reads a digital representation of the color and sends it to the monitor or TV. The quality of the color would have more to do with the monitor/or TV as it takes the digital date and translates it to what we see. As far as the PS5 pro and 4090 are concerned I'm sure the hexcode for the color red is #FF0000 on both. I guess the software itself could also make the difference if the developers changed something in how the colors are coded on each system. That's also a possibility. I could be wrong, but all I know is that the colors look great on both my PC and PS5 pro when I play on my OLED monitor.

[@DsLmaNiaC]

The recordings are fine, in fact the 4090 one has better colored than the PS5 pro one. They are both looking great on the oled. It has something to do with DaVinci Resolve, it reads the two videos in a different way. Maybe the capture card recorded it in a different color space but the obs records in 10 bit always except from the times I am streaming. I will try to fix it if I can but it is what it is.

[@Richdadful]

what the point of comparing a 700$ machine to a PC which has GPU of 2000$ and whole PC might be 6-7 times expensive than PS5 pro.

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@Richdadful just to demonstrate how close or how far it is from each other. The PS5 Pro in Europe costs 950 euro if you buy the stand and the disk drive so it is far from the 700 dollars in the US which I believe is the price before tax. In fact, this comparison shows how well the PS5 Pro can do when compared to the PC on this title.

[@wingedhussar1453]

Because ps5 pro looks better then this 2000 machine lol.lightning looks better on ps5😊

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@@wingedhussar1453 It actually does not.

[@hector-tp3pv]

@@wingedhussar1453no it doesn’t lmao pc just looks way better and in person it probably looks even way better

[@MistaVauros]

Here goes the delusions of grandeur for PS5 Pro owners that think a $700 console is the equivalent of a 4070/4080/4090 😔. If you’re happy with your Pro purchase, cool. However, don’t ever think that console is anywhere close to the level of high-end PC that runs games at NATIVE 4k, Full Ray Tracing, Ultra/maxed settings, all at well above 60fps. STOP IT!!!

[@alvinbates21985]

Why Alloy a Burnette in the 4090 and a red head on the ps4 and 5 😢

[@DEATH_FROM_ABOVE.50]

Nice video! The 4090 is a killer😂 but for 700 dollars, the console it's alright 👍

[@DsLmaNiaC]

I totally agree.

[@DEATH_FROM_ABOVE.50]

@DsLmaNiaC In my opinion, for the console players, the best way to pair the Pro is with an OLED TV. I'm running my 4090 with an OLED 4k 240hz monitor, and I'll never go back to anything that isn't an OLED 🤦‍♂️😅😅

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@DEATH_FROM_ABOVE.50 I have been running mine with the LG 42c2 too and the OG PS5 on another 65 inch for some years now and I cannot go back too. I agree they are perfect.

[@HenkBrandjes]

Ps5 pro for 699 for the win 🥳👍🏼

[@mmanz123]

PC your monitor.. HDR not supported?

[@DsLmaNiaC]

It's HDR.

[@sonyse2t5]

Shows how good the PS5 pro is.....😂 And a testimonial to the programmer pushing the ps5 hardware. The game is from a SONY studio, so I would not expect anything less.

[@InnerFire6213]

so ps5pro is just using mexico filter, other than that they look quite identical

[@yjh1004angel]

Pro fidelity mode what pc ultra settings this is performance mode on ps5 pro not fair.

[@DsLmaNiaC]

The fidelity mode would run at 30 fps and would look bad in terms of the framerate.

[@Hypergangnam]

Since the 4090 probably runs comfortably above 60 frames, it would be very unfair to compare it to 30 frames.. One thing i would love, is to see a game running PSSR though, compared to the 4090.

[@EMC_CO86_0_Z]

RTX was the best Graphics card ever by reviews that’s great for PlayStation

[@DsLmaNiaC]

Great job yes.

[@brichardson342]

Idk why ur trying to even vs the most powerful gpu in the world and a 4070 laptop gpu console. Turn on fps abd u will see why the 4090 is king bec it can run 4k games well over 100fps

[@DsLmaNiaC]

You cannot run all of them at native 4k and 100 fps without activating DLSS or frame gen, but it can run this one easily.

[@mongmanification]

Its not a 4070 laptop gpu. More 3070 ti.

[@allears3867]

PS5 pro has better coloring and the 4090 is a lil sharper

[@iPh1l1pp]

Pc is sharper. But colors are different

[@wg8561]

Looks as good or better on the pro👍👍

[@NOXX1985]

Pro all day hands down

[@RUY2323]

The PS5 PRO is a giant killer!!

[@DsLmaNiaC]

How exactly? It's not.

[@Buccitalksthatish]

Yea but you failed to mention or maybe not understanding those 3Party games aren’t using the full potential of ps5/ps5 pro as you you can see with this games you posted. It only show what that 700$ console is capable of over a 6k and up pc build. Well cheaper now cuz we are years later and new cards are hitting the market. Good video though ps5 pro for the win. Only cuz better fos and little more bush doesn’t justify them thousands

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@Buccitalksthatish Ps5 pro is the minimum way to play. You don't just get a few bushes more with the pcs, you are getting way better resolutions and frames on top of that The PC is on another league. The PS5 pro is impressive too.

[@Buccitalksthatish]

@ you’re gonna have to be more convincing with your approach, I get the caption card and everything else is not showing the full picture but when we look at things here once again, the price of a 4090 upgrade for better resolution and frames doesn’t justify 6K and up for a build. Again, they have a lot of analyst channels out here who show differences and the naked eye can’t even catch unless zoomed in. I get the feeling and understand having better frames and resolution and what everyone else is feeling who move to PC coming from PS five to pro feels different coming from the PS4 to PS five feels different but that’s not a reasonable price versus the price jump going to PC when it’s not that big of a difference that can’t be shown when zooming in only you see differences yes you could see more tracing slightly better textures, more native gameplay, but native and upscaling is not that much different sometimes the other looks better actually and some games when not brute, forcing.

[@Mr.Jones144]

Ps5 looks warmer, only difference i see

[@sirgareth5283]

On my 4090 rig the graphics are visibly better than on my PS5Pro.

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@sirgareth5283 yes they are, I can confirm that. But the PS5 Pro version is looking great too.

[@maxminy5634]

@@DsLmaNiaCI mean it better be. The 4090 alone is 2x the price of the ps5pro entire system.

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@maxminy5634 of Course. Noone expects to perform the same. The comparison is to just show the differences although youtube compression does not help that much. Regardless the PS5 Pro on Horizon Forbidden West or Zero Dawn can easily produce an outcome that is extremely good for a console.

[@sirgareth5283]

@@DsLmaNiaC of course. A very good port for a „small“ console.

[@Tritonal92]

I mean, it better be... it's more than double the price of the PS5 Pro

[@Atum1c]

Pro looks better , why was the raindrops on her face not their on pro - they are on mine

[@DsLmaNiaC]

The colors look better somehow i messed up. The resolution is higher on the PC

[@Atum1c]

@ fair enough bro , nice job though ..obviously pc is better but the pro holds its own

[@SSJBen]

Why does the PC version look like it has a piss filter on?

[@DsLmaNiaC]

It has a green tint on it when I imported it to Resolve. I had to correct it but I missed it in the preview.

[@jetmirbasha644]

rtx is supreme 1:54 see all stars clearly on Rtx

[@DsLmaNiaC]

You can see it in every scene, just pause and watch the higher resolution in everything.

[@adriangamez8400]

Ps5 wins in this comparation

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@@adriangamez8400 Respectable but no.

[@adriangamez8400]

@@DsLmaNiaCno, ps5 wins here… rtx is better, but here, ps5 pro wins… blind

[@vtg1800]

For PS5 Pro Blurry image all side by PSSR but is look good for $700 4K 60fps, I run this games with RTX 4070 Ti DLSS quality, max setting, FG on, I can get 165-200fps in 4K TV more better level of distance then PS5 Pro. I like play in PC now :)

[@mrmoro11tv]

Ps5 pro tint 40 and rtx 4090 tint 60

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@@mrmoro11tv though I didn't touch tint.

[@mrmoro11tv]

@@DsLmaNiaC I see... by the way have you compared Final fantasy 7 Rebirth ps5 graphic mode and ps5 pro versatile mode? Many say versatile mode is graphic mode but 60fps, is it true that there are no other improvements? I am quite interested in ps5 pro and want to upgrade from ps5, do you think it is worth it?

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@mrmoro11tv I have already uploaded a video about Rebirth. I love FF series and especially the FF VII universe. It seems to me that they have implemented the graphics mode in 60 fps. Everything seems way more crisp and clear although It is obvious the game will be at its best form when it comes on PC

[@drongorius]

So the phrase the 4090 killer about pc5 pro were true . Now even more pc casuals will cry .

[@DsLmaNiaC]

That is so not true. Please don't troll.

[@drongorius]

@@DsLmaNiaCthis video actually proves it is true . Too many games lately look and run better on PlayStation .

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@@drongorius No it doesn't. Only if you watch it through a mobile phone you can claim the two videos are equal. If I wanted to bash the PS5 Pro I would compare Hogwards Legacy with full ray tracing effects, Cyberpunk 2077 with path tracing, The Witcher 3 with RT effects or Alan Wake II. I uploaded the video just so we could spot what the difference is, unfortunately I cannot show you 100, 120 or 240 fps which will never be an option on the PS5 Pro and on top of that the video has some colors off. There is no game that looks better on a PS5 than on a PC. Optimization may be better in some games, not all of them and it is very obvious why that happens. The hardware is the same for everyone. Not only you are lacking knowledge about the subject but you also intentionally try to mislead when there is a whole conversation on the video about the color issues. Better stop acting like fanboys and appreciate the hardware and not just the hardware you like.

[@drongorius]

⁠as I said , it does in some games that are optimized properly . The games you mentioned are optimised greatly for nvidia cards . I said in some . We already have games that look better on base ps5 , like ragnarrog, hi fi rush etc. as about 250 fps , you will never see them , no screens for that . The consoles are getting closer and closer to the pc giants , that’s my point .

[@shambler7359]

Prefer the Ps5 Pro version, PC version looks good too, but it looks bland

[@DsLmaNiaC]

It's way more detailed but it needed some color correction because the original video is not like this.

[@ZubaerGaming]

Water looks better in PS5 8:24

[@brenobonfim5749]

4090 has pop-in lol Pro wins

[@bighousemusic628]

ps5 blurry and lack definition 4090 wins hands down.

[@enricogiampaglia97]

Boh, nùn lo so, per la Playstation 5 PRO non delude😅!

[@Arey-w6b]

paly it in 8k it will destroy pro

[@DsLmaNiaC]

The PC is already far ahead in 4k too but the PS5 Pro in this game is doing great.

[@Arey-w6b]

its only in fps bro in graphics rems only little bit but if we use 4090 full potnetial at 8k ps5 pro is crushed

[@DrLecter80]

4090 priece = 3 PS5 PRO :D

[@kennethwilliams9668]

And it showes in performance, trust me

[@Crimsongz]

4090 = PS7 lol

[@jean-guydaraiche]

pc sharpness alot better

[@Zie5934]

Ps5 pro better

[@DsLmaNiaC]

No, sorry it's not.

[@FANTASMAGAMEPLAY2]

4090 IS MONSTER

[@Jura87able]

my 3090 can handle the game at 4k 60 fps too or more fps so my 3090 is a monster too. 4090 is a joke xD😂

[@yjh1004angel]

The price is also monster 😂😂😂

[@tommybull6578]

Windows hdr is doo doo

[@chazman1974]

Lol..wow! Enjoy your pro, but dont be delusional.

[@DsLmaNiaC]

What do you mean? Why do you think I am?

[@0ooALEoo0ximba]

ps5 pro wins

[@1stoptech]

That means that PS6 will look like this 4090 LOL... There will be no more earth-shattering differences. Get ready for the cry babies

[@DsLmaNiaC]

By then we are going to have the 6090 though.

[@1stoptech]

@@DsLmaNiaC And that will be $3,000+ tax so theres that

[@DsLmaNiaC]

@@1stoptech Regardless it's going to be 2 generations behind those graphics cards. Except if Sony decides to surprise people.