Hovind Sues for $500M, a Movie & a Pocket Knife (feat. Robert Baty)

[@randomname6710]

Hey you guys should go easy on Kent. He is the single most important person in converting me away from creationism and Christianity. Once i watched him it was all immediately clear lol.

[@mathewadams2929]

He is directly responsible for my de conversion

[@loki6626]

Keep up the good work Kent👍

[@musicauthority7828]

Hovind doesn't realize that what he actually says work's as reverse psychology. driving many people away from Christianity. he has proven that he is a sorry SOB.

[@milkenobi]

AND … the more time he spends whacking atheists the less time he spends whacking wives. You’re doing Kent’s victims a services, Paulogia

[@rianmacdonald9454]

never stop an enemy from making a mistake.

[@the_kraken6549]

“Keep your head down and you won’t get whacked.” translation: “Stop disagreeing with me, or I’ll hurl meaningless insults at you!”

[@silverwurm]

He’ll call your mother a hampster

[@the_kraken6549]

@@silverwurm and he’ll point out that your father smelt of elderberries

[@troyshelly9758]

On extreme measures he will fart in your general direction.

[@brotbrotsen1100]

Whacking is something he is expirenced in, he proudly talked about how he hit his 7 year old son for disobedience.

[@inyobill]

Yah, a lesson Kent ignores, but what would he do to make a living if he didn't promote his message to the gullible?

[@vrencan9735]

Congratulations, Paulogia. You're living in Kent's head rent free. 👍

[@bskec2177]

A very spacious apt. Completely unfurnished tho.

[@Paulogia]

so it seems

[@SaltosAxe]

@@bskec2177 To borrow a phrase from Rebecca Watson, it's doubtful he has 2 spare brain cells to rub together

[@timorieseler276]

Exactly what I was going to write! Damn, I wasn't prepared for that... 😂

[@gowdsake7103]

Nothing much else in there !

[@cnault3244]

So Kent spends all that time discussing how the avatar Paulogia uses does not represent how Paulogia actually appears. Kent should be talking about all those caucasian blond blue eyed images of Jesus.

[@empressoftheknownuniverse]

ZING! 🤣

[@psychicandice]

Wow what a great point. It reminds me of a quote from Patrice ONeal who said, “why are religious people self righteous and angry about all sorts of things. What if I’m mad about how Jesus looks like Tom Petty” haha.

[@taylorlibby7642]

Jesus shows a remarkable ability to look like the majority of the congregation wherever that congregation may be.

[@craigr6963]

Maybe Kent could spend some time talking about diploma mill "doctors". Oh, wait...

[@drlegendre]

Kent Hovind thinks that attacking a person's appearance and orientation is equivalent to attacking their claims and arguments. What's really sad about Kent, is that this is literally the best he can do. It's time to start acting like a grown-up, and admit that you've been beat, Kent. Paul's the better man and he's had your number since day one.

[@EnglishMike]

More background on Paul Hansen. He used to be a slumlord, renting out apartments in buildings that were in terrible condition. The city would issue citations and summons for code violations (they really weren't fit for living in), and Hansen would clog up the courts with his sovereign citizen nonsense, one time even going as far as denying his name on the court documents because it was capitalized (a sov. cit thing). So the judge simply declared Hansen not present in the courtroom and ended the proceeding.

[@Paulogia]

ha ha ha ha

[@jeffczermanski2993]

Yep, sounds like that guy is consistent with Kent Hovind's brand of stupid. Too bad he can't trademark that.

[@Fimbulvinter19]

Sometimes it can be so satisfying to give 'sovereign citizens' EXACTLY what they want. So often they haven't actually thought their position through to the end. "You are saying that you aren't the person named in these documents, as his name is capitalized and yours isn't? Ok, then I declare him to be in contempt of court, and issue summary judgement against him."

[@Revanbzn]

Kent is so not prepared for that.

[@kennnnys]

@@Revanbzn haha shots fired

[@swolejeezy2603]

Kent: Courts have no jurisdiction over meeee!!! Also Kent: Please courts give me money

[@Paulogia]

right?!?

[@ObjectiveZoomer]

Guys I don't know why you think there's a contradiction, obviously if the court acts against Kent hovind interest than they have no authority over him but if they want to give him money then they're totally authorized to do that. Obviously

[@Virtualblueart]

The eternal Sov Cit paradox that.

[@Ugly_German_Truths]

@@ObjectiveZoomer Because law does not work the way that you can decide "I will only submit to laws that i LIKE". Obviously there always will be laws many people do not agree with. If we would make it voluntary to submit under those and a court would first have to check off the list to see under what "authority" you willingly "consent", it would be chaos and almost anarchy... If you recognize SOME rights, you have to accept ALL of them being valid on the same basis. Now that does not mean that you could not or should not by democratical means try to overthrow the laws you disagree with, but that is still a different thing from Doctor Spongebrains "i do not accept that i have broken the law, but now will sue you for breaking it yourself" stance. But as it has a lot of similarities to his stance towards "natural law" and how he refuses to accept half of those physical, biological and chemical "laws" based on nothing more than that they would make his whole belief ridiculous, Kent simply does not get reality and how you cannot pick and choose from it.

[@soapygreens1557]

@@Ugly_German_Truths Good response. But, the poster was being facetious.

[@brettvv7475]

Wow, he really is just a terrible person. Simple as that.

[@jamierichardson7683]

Yep, and getting crazier and meaner with every passing day.

[@munstrumridcully]

Just look at his vindictive glee about "whacking" people like Paulogia...a) he seems to think anyone but his flock gives a f---k about getting "whacked" and b) he seems to get off on the idea of "humiliating" his "opponents" rather than, like Paulogia, making actually substantive arguments. What a clown!

[@notwhatiwasraised2b]

think leeches

[@MagereHein]

In other news: triangles have three sides.

[@terryfuldsgaming7995]

Its funny to me that i only ever see satan preaching christianity anymore... Hovind, pat robertson, trump/ the GOP...

[@EnglishMike]

When Hovind and Hansen were in prison, they took a petty criminal from Florida who was awaiting trial under their wing and completely screwed his defense -- encouraging him to reject a plea deal that would have gotten him five years, and trying their sovereign citizen garbage instead. He ended up getting 20 years instead (it was his third strike). Don't feel too sorry for him, though. He managed to get his 20 year sentence overturned recently and was release with time served, but within months he'd been arrested two or three more times, and he's back in prison, completely squandering his lucky break.

[@kenbee1957]

Damn

[@Virtualblueart]

Sounds like he was their little experiment. If it had worked they would prob used that defence for themselves.

[@ИльяИшикаев]

Maybe he tries to make a martyr out of himself. That's the only way his extremely dirty yet seemingly failtastic games make sense. Because otherwise that's just pathetic.

[@stylis666]

You seem to know a lot about this guy. Do you have any other hobbies we don't know about? Like having _a very particular set of skills?_ :p

[@ИльяИшикаев]

@@stylis666 you got problems?

[@dmckenzie9281]

In the early 1980's I was in my late teens and attending an Independent Fundamental Baptist church that went through a sovereign citizen period that ended with the Pastor being arrested for operating an unlicensed vehicle without an operators license. He spent about a month is county jail most of it for contempt because he refused to recognize the courts jurisdiction over himself. He eventually saw the error of his ways. It was some crazy shit.I can look back and say that I was young and gullible.I was out of that church a few years later. It took another 20 years to shed the yoke of religion altogether.

[@drlegendre]

@Sam Bacon Most if these 'soverigns', or at least the majority of the leading personalities, know precisely what they're doing. They're the "... baffle them with bullshit" brigade.

[@MrAghamdi]

Kent seems to be weirdly obsessed with you and your videos. I don't know why but him making a video about a comment on a video you uploaded last year really show what's keeping this guy awake at night.

[@Paulogia]

right??!? no offence, but even I'm not reading my own comments a year after the fact.

[@Virtualblueart]

@@Paulogia Perhaps he feels you are endangering the only thing he cares about: The amount money he can con out of his followers.

[@Ugly_German_Truths]

@@Paulogia why not? If i find a video i commented on years ago or see an old comment being reactivated by somebody else reacting to it, i want to find out what i thought back then... I do not make a cult out of it or anything, it usually isn't much of an intellectual goldmine what i can find, but it's still an object of curiosity and i can't imagine anybody else NOT beign at least a little bit curious about the same.

[@Paulogia]

@@Ugly_German_Truths It's not a rule... I just don't generally have the time. My focus is usually two videos forward.

[@maksimbolonkin]

Maybe Kent is just one of those...

[@HTYM]

When logic fails, make fun of someone's avatar and steal their opening line. 🙄 Hovind isn't even trying at this point.

[@jasa_TheRealOne]

Kent "I understand the law, and I didn't break it" the real world "you don't understand the law, you did break it" ALSO 45 counts of Structuring?!?! Damn

[@MiikeJone]

That's close to a million bucks in cash over a few month long period. Money he conned poor gullible Christians out of. Good people. People that most likely DO live Christ like lives. THIS is the problem with the tax laws that protect, nay, ENCOURAGE the type of scamming pieces of shit like the Hovinds to do what they do.

[@ferociousfeind8538]

45 accounts, which were all affirmed by a jury, I think. It's been a while, but how open-and-shut this case was surprised me, but Kent Hovind's whining about it really _really_ didn't.

[@Ugly_German_Truths]

@@MiikeJone Well half a million, with some days up to four or five deposits or withdrawals JUST under the 10,000 Dollar treshold of which the bank has then to notify the authorities. So it's not even just an accident, it was a conscious scheme. And it did not work out as the bank notified the authorities anyway over this persistent pattern of NOT getting past the treshold.

[@himi6536]

@@Ugly_German_Truths I remember the few times I had to withdraw cash from the bank, the bank wouldn't let me get $9,000 one time. They told me to get $10,000 and then deposit $1,000 back in just to make myself safe from authorities. I wasn't doing anything illegal, but good on my bank to inform me of what I could do to help myself. So, by my experience, anyone doing it even twice would have probably been reported as sus right away. The only other time I withdrew a large amount, it was $11.5k so no issues there lmao

[@Cheepchipsable]

@@himi6536 Which is why structuring is BS.

[@Tovish1988]

This is shocking. Hardworking old fashioned grifters first endorsing then conning one another? While they attack the government with one hand and wield it as a battle-axe in the other? It's as if they arbitrarily endorse then condemn things at will as it suits them . . .

[@Paulogia]

that can't be right 😊

[@Tovish1988]

@@Paulogia hey since you're more likely to see this than a random dm, if you ever want a scientist's help on a project I'm in, not looking for credit or exposure. Undergrad math/physics double, grad in biophysics, work in the chemical industry.

[@Tovish1988]

@bob niblitt Lol thanks but not trying to flex, just putting out there what kind of pseudoscientific claims I might be qualified to help assess or counter.

[@adrianinha19]

When I was little and still going to churh, even "dummy" was considered a bad word. I cannot belive Kent is allowed to call people idiots, stupid, and worse without anyone from his "flock" even batting and eye.

[@inyobill]

As soon as the argument goes insulting, the arguer has conceded that they have no actual credible argument.

[@sunshowerpainting1]

I forget who but I think someone once said that "By their fruits you shall know them." I can't feel sorry for Mr. Hovind. The man is his own worst enemy....

[@truthgiver8286]

calling Kent Hovind an idiot is a compliment

[@phillyphakename1255]

He avoids the four letter really horrifyingly bad words, and so he looks like an angel compared to Emma Thorne who will use an eff bomb for emphasis when appropriate. Kent is Holier Than Thou in the worst possible way, abusing his wifes, not contributing financially to society, seeking retribution on family members, etc. But at least he doesn't swear, so he's a good Christian man.

[@NDHFilms]

Last month, I drove down to the San Luis Valley of Colorado for a vacation. I made a point of stopping by Kent Hovind's alma mater/diploma mill, Patriot Bible University. If you pay $2,000 or so to Patriot, they will mail you a doctorate. Any time Hovind mentions that he has a PhD, that is what he is referring to.

[@andystokes8702]

And if you are not paying taxes $2,000 is easy to find, especially if you are effectively crowd-funded by a gullible flock.

[@kai_plays_khomus]

Ever read his dissertation? It was leaked and is available online. This bullshit is so incredible embarassing, it's literally on the level of a 7th grader whose intelligence is under average. They could just as well do without any dissertations or just piles of blank paper.

[@dingdongism]

@@kai_plays_khomus I think Kent's dissertation would do just fine in a 7th grade essay contest. Middle of the pack, solid C+/B- work.

[@phillyphakename1255]

​@@dingdongismidunno, it's pretty long. You gotta be probably a high school freshman to be able to waffle on so long.

[@empressoftheknownuniverse]

Wow, Prisoner # 06452-017 is very immature about name calling. You should sue him for $64520.17 for ripping off your tag-line. 🤔🇨🇦

[@Paulogia]

I'll look in to that...

[@empressoftheknownuniverse]

@@Paulogia Cool, it's really you. We grew up in the same area, so I really understand and appreciate your channel. Thank you for doing this. 😜

[@nemilyk]

@@Paulogia The crazy thing is you kinda might have a case here... I recall something about an evangelical talk show called that got in trouble with PBS for ripping off the name of their show "Science Friday." I think they called it "good science friday". I'd at least have a 'cease and desist' issued... Then again I'm not sure how the jurisdictions works between Canada and the US...

[@sethhovis6444]

Paul, I appreciate that you took the time and gave the effort to so thoroughly expose Kent Hovind for being a grifter. I can also admire how insulting and infuriating it will be for him to have his personal failures, especially as a father, put on broad display. How could a man with his egomania react otherwise? As a side, you and your time are far more valuable than him. You have done more than enough to convince a reasonable listener. Don't use anymore of your time on him. He isn't worth it. Respect, Seth

[@Ugly_German_Truths]

People will still notice HOvind barking up at Paul's legs like one of these purse sized doggies and demand he take on the "challenge". It's always that way with "feuding" youtube channels, you cannot just refuse to cover anybody trying to always talk about you, even if you can limit it to the minimal "Look, he still has no valid arguments, can we stop bothering with him for another 6 months" videos...

[@1970Phoenix]

I respectfully disagree. Hovind's channels are viewed by Christians, some of whom are questioning their faith or looking or "evidence" to buttress their beliefs. By continuing to interact with Kent, Kent mentions Paulogia's name and channel. This exposes Paul to people who may be receptive to his message (i.e. scientific truth and reality), who otherwise may not have found Paul's content. Kent is a dishonest, arrogant fucktard with shit for brains, but I still think there is benefit in Paul continuing to interact with him.

[@teknicron1080]

The irony here . . . Kent is JEALOUS that his son played the system better than he did.

[@shriggs55]

Kent thinks he's funny.He is not.But he is sure irritating as hell!

[@timeshark8727]

Meh... he's just a sad, crazy old man trying desperately to stay relevant. Just ignore him.

[@shriggs55]

@@timeshark8727 Yeah.I agree.

[@munstrumridcully]

@Kevin McDougall _"his 'comedy' is at an elementary-school-level"_ You mean like his "PhD" "dissertation"? ;)

[@munstrumridcully]

@Kevin McDougall So true! :)

[@michaelrch]

He is funny to his audience. Which is fairly tragic.

[@shadoslacker7409]

Whenever someone points out that "Doctor" Hovind doesnt have a real PhD, he cries ad hominem. But here is he is going on an ad hominem spree about Paulogia's avatar/appearance/voice. Well, I guess nobody expects any better from Hovind at this point. Also - "former evolutionist"? Seems unlikely.

[@thomasdoubting]

Not paying taxes is like showing up to a potluck empty handed and stuffing your face with other peoples food! 😠#*@!

[@autobotstarscream765]

Except in Dr. Yoshi's case, he also sneezed on the food and gave everyone there HOVIND-19.

[@richardstevenson371]

Even better, there is records of his wife applying for financial aid from a hospital on the grounds they had no income.

[@robertcampbell6349]

Or showing up at church and helping yourself to the contents of the offering plate.

[@rev68]

Father suing son. Christian suing christian. It's almost like they are average people and christianity doesn't really alter their behavior.

[@Marniwheeler]

Well it makes some not murder people. Many apologists insist morals are given by God, and without him it would be OK to murder who you want. The fear of an eternal punishment is the only thing that keeps them from murdering. I don't have that fear, and get along fine, but those professional apologists bring it up over and over again.

[@guytheincognito4186]

Voltaire: “Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities, Can Make You Commit Atrocities”

[@guytheincognito4186]

Steven Weinberg: "Religion is an insult to human dignity. Without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion."

[@skade245]

Dominic Mahoney Professional bullshitters. It’s very VERY rare to find someone who would genuinely rape and murder if god doesn’t exist, the ones saying it don’t even believe it themselves.

[@Foz300]

I believe a bold proclamation about being a Christian has nothing to do with actually being a Christian. As you have pointed his behavior does not match the Character of Christ.

[@aarondavis6247]

Prison chaplain here. If I had a dollar for every time an incarcerated person told me that their case was going to change a lot of things when it got overturned, well, I wouldn't have to work for the state anymore!

[@griffinnunnelee7236]

I forget where, but I’m pretty sure that somewhere in the New Testament, it says to settle any dispute you have with your fellow Christians without getting involved with the government. Then again though, this wouldn’t be the first time Kent Hovind has blatantly disobeyed his own holy book

[@swolejeezy2603]

I wouldn’t be surprised if he hasn’t gotten past the first five chapters of Genesis

[@c.guydubois8270]

"render unto god bla bla bla,"...

[@EdwardHowton]

Well, as @Swole there says, it would be surprising if Kent had read any of the bible, because he's functionally illiterate, and I doubt anybody bothered to read it to him since his parents died, because who could stand being near a Hovind-spawn that long. But you're forgetting, Kent doesn't believe the christian-infested US government is christian at all. And he's part of an anti-government cult on top of being in his own religious cult. And the bible (according to Kent) does not say to render unto Caesar what belongs to Caesar, it says "Render unto LOL jk dood all your shit belongs to God fo rizzle lol u don't pay taxes god ain't no square".

[@munstrumridcully]

@@EdwardHowton I love how Kent rejects government authority when the Bible commands that Christians _obey_ the local government. The Bible was used for centuries to justify the divine right if kings

[@EdwardHowton]

@@munstrumridcully It's not the least bit surprising. Libertarians are basically _slightly less insane_ "sovereign citizens" and both groups despise government intervention... except when it comes time to sue the people who have wronged Them(tm) as Individuals Who Are People Who Are Corporations Representing The Person Known As themselves. I used to listen to a lot of that kind of rhetoric for a laugh and it's really nothing new. "I'm a strong inddependant fish what don't need to bicycle and I can stand up for myself to sue you! but WAAAH SOMEONE HUWT MY FEEWINGS DADDY GUBMINT HAAALP" In this case it's particularly odd because who the fuck does Kent thing is going to side with him in his government-based lawsuit against the government? Jesus, one assumes, but even Jesus would think Kent is an idiot, if he existed.

[@luvanime1986]

I practiced tax exempt tax law compliance for decades and saw many church officials trying to structure payment to avoid personal income tax but every time I notified the IRS, they didn't want anything to do with it because the religious right has too much power in government. Preachers will also give numerous sermons whereby they tell their flocks who to vote for certain politicians even though they know it's against IRS regulations and they could lose their exempt status. But again, they know the IRS will never prosecute. Its sick how much privilege religion actually has in this country.

[@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392]

you pple deny the law of biognesis and also deny basic biology that life is biological machine as like car . compose of various parts that are interdependent and if single part is missing the system fails . or if merely a single part the miissing the rest of system it does not work . f0r example human heart liver lung kidney blood brain . etc if one part is missing whole system fails and if merely a heart it does not work either it merely failurs . you need instantaneous generation of human for reason given one part missing the system fails and if merely one part the system just like car it has fuel pump as like human heart and this true it single cell level DNA stores the information , ribosome decodes the DNA ATP powers process , if one part of system is missing such dna you cannot replicate the machinery because information to recreate it store on dna so through its life cycle . without leaving replicates of itself . so it does not exist nor does a copy so bacteria levease existence . but also ribomseome you could not get information out of single cell without it and so sellf cannot replicate and dies of off without leaving replices of itself . ATP powers that process of riboseome decoding the dna with out ithe process does not work . so if one parts missing the system fails and if merely one part it merely degrades such as DNA it cannot do anything on its own . for example a virus is bacteriaphage and DNA and bind to single cell and injects itself the DNA and hijacks the machinery and replicates it self until ruptures the cell . proving DNA on its own can do nothing . so requires instaous creation or it will fail and merely degenerate along with data on mutations causing cancer , expermintes done fruit files and bacteria showed the mutation are merely degenerative to genetic code . and data on human demonstrate mutation are degenerative . such chernoble and fallujah and Vietnam . the mutation merely caused deformities or they died as like in fruit fly and bacteria experiments . life requires instouse creation . because is it system of parts and one part on its own can do nothing and system missing one part can do nothing either . but mutation degenerative meaning that single cell come into existence enough generation and organism the genetic code degenerates over long enough period and goes out existence . so evolution is false the law of biogenesis life comes from life so non life does no turn to life . and something cannot come from nothing so idea of universe created itself is false . anyway evolution is pseudoscience from 19th century used by dogmatic atheist is justify their worldview a assault against but also a political ideology .

[@TaCtiCaL323]

@@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392 Well THAT was a bunch of moronic gibberish. Take your copy and paste kent hovind garbage back to his channel.

[@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392]

​@@TaCtiCaL323 from the 14 to mid 19th century the foundation axiom of science was GOD created the universe and it was designed and orderly . and that by learning about how nature worked we could learn about GOD . then in mid 19th cetnruy it become about how it got that way and historical narratives and forsenics to support that historical narrative . anyway en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Kepler Kepler lived in an era when there was no clear distinction between astronomy and astrology, but there was a strong division between astronomy (a branch of mathematics within the liberal arts) and physics (a branch of natural philosophy). Kepler also incorporated religious arguments and reasoning into his work, motivated by the religious conviction and belief that God had created the world according to an intelligible plan that is accessible through the natural light of reason.[6] Kepler described his new astronomy as "celestial physics",[7] as "an excursion into Aristotle's Metaphysics",[8] and as "a supplement to Aristotle's On the Heavens",[9] transforming the ancient tradition of physical cosmology by treating astronomy as part of a universal mathematical physics.[10] libquotes.com/galileo-galilei/quotes/god I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use and by some other means to give us knowledge which we can attain by them. www.brainyquote.com/quotes/isaac_newton_753055 Opposite to godliness is atheism in profession, and idolatry in practice. Atheism is so senseless and odious to mankind, that it never had many professors. Isaac Newton www.brainyquote.com/quotes/isaac_newton_753055 now then evolution . the DNA code must increase in information as organism get more advanced more information is need so increasing in complexity . becuase if it was stagnant and remained bacteria it would never go beyond a bacteria then evolution is false as there is no means from single to monkey to human . evolution would be false Mutagen From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In genetics, a mutagen is a physical or chemical agent that changes the genetic material, usually DNA, of an organism and thus increases the frequency of mutations above the natural background level. As many mutations can cause cancer, mutagens are therefore also likely to be carcinogens, although not always necessarily so. All mutagens have characteristic mutational signatures with some chemicals becoming mutagenic through cellular processes. Not all mutations are caused by mutagens: so-called "spontaneous mutations" occur due to spontaneous hydrolysis, errors in DNA replication, repair and recombination. so mutagen do not cause mutation they merely accelerate them or intensify them . so question is does mutation add information or cause the loss of it . is increasing the complexity of gentic code or decreasing it stagnant is same as decreasing meaning single does not change from single cell to something more complex but rather stay the same meaning evolution is false . . now we have data on bacteria and fruit files as well as human data . chernbole fallujah and vietname and result is mutation merely cause the lose of genetic infomation resulting in defomtires or the organism dies . now then in 1980s they experimented on fruit files and bacteria the purposfully tried to mutate them . and results was deformites or died and no matter how many gneration they remained the same . the same result we got from fruit files and bacteria as did thehuman that were affect by mutagens such as radiation and chemcial agens ( agent orange ) www.icr.org/article/no-fruit-fly-evolution-even-after-600/ No Fruit Fly Evolution Even after 600 Generations BY BRIAN THOMAS, PH.D. * | TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2010 Many Americans believe that the big-picture story of evolution, as biology professors routinely expound it, is false.1 Basically, they haven't bought into the concept that all life descended from one common ancestor that miraculously sprang into being millions of years ago. And that makes sense, considering there are no real examples of that kind of evolution. If evolutionary biologists could document such evolution in action, they could vindicate their worldview and cite real research to support their surreal claims. In 1980, this search for proof led researchers to painstakingly and purposefully mutate each core gene involved in fruit fly development. The now classic work, for which the authors won the Nobel Prize in 1995, was published in Nature.2 The experiments proved that the mutation of any of these core developmental genes―mutations that would be essential for the fruit fly to evolve into any other creature―merely resulted in dead or deformed fruit flies. This therefore showed that fruit flies could not evolve. Similarly, Michigan State University evolutionary biologists Richard Lenski and his colleagues searched for signs of evolution in bacteria for 20 years, tracking 40,000 generations.3 In the end, the species that they started with was hobbled by accumulated mutations, and the only changes that had occurred were degenerative. University of Bristol emeritus professor of bacteriology Alan Linton summarized the situation: the same results from baceteria and fruit files were also demonstrated on humans when chernbole incident occured the pple who effected got cancer and their offspring badly deformed . along with animals the mutation copying error and deleterious . the loss of information chernobylguide.com/chernobyl_mutations/ also in fallujah the same results from chernoble as demonstrated in fruit files exspermintes they merely become deformed or die . Fallujah birth defects: A toxic remnant of the US invasion of Iraq? kzbin.info/www/bejne/e4Wvi3ile9NgosU as well Vietnam the same results . Vietnam: My orange pain (RT Documentary) kzbin.info/www/bejne/bJLYZ4ygbbB5b80 so life is biological machine composed of parts and system . and mutagen merely intensify the mutation or accelerate them . so it merely speed up the degenerative process . that is what radiation or other mutagen do cause mutation . the are copying error the lost of genetic information. the speed up a eventual extinction of all life . so natural selection select what is already there . speciation merely gives variety within a kind so a dog dog a cow a cow a cat cat etc . mutation are merely copying error the loss of genetic information. so life is biological machine and mutation cause genetic decay . every generation accrues more mutation and genetic deformities and eventually extinction . that is what evidence says the mutation merely cause genetic decay . and eventually existions of life

[@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392]

@@TaCtiCaL323 EVOLUTION IS ATHEIST PROPGANDA Social Darwinism social theory WRITTEN BY The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree.... See Article History Social Darwinism, the theory that human groups and races are subject to the same laws of natural selection as Charles Darwin perceived in plants and animals in nature. According to the theory, which was popular in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the weak were diminished and their cultures delimited while the strong grew in power and cultural influence over the weak. Social Darwinists held that the life of humans in society was a struggle for existence ruled by “survival of the fittest,” a phrase proposed by the British philosopher and scientist Herbert Spencer. Spencer, Herbert Spencer, Herbert Herbert Spencer. The Print Collector/Heritage-Images Aristotle Read More on This Topic biology, philosophy of: Evolutionary ethics …form of evolutionary ethics is social Darwinism, though this view owes far more to Herbert Spencer than it does to Darwin himself. It begins... The social Darwinists-notably Spencer and Walter Bagehot in England and William Graham Sumner in the United States-believed that the process of natural selection acting on variations in the population would result in the survival of the best competitors and in continuing improvement in the population. Societies were viewed as organisms that evolve in this manner. The theory was used to support laissez-faire capitalism and political conservatism. Class stratification was justified on the basis of “natural” inequalities among individuals, for the control of property was said to be a correlate of superior and inherent moral attributes such as industriousness, temperance, and frugality. Attempts to reform society through state intervention or other means would, therefore, interfere with natural processes; unrestricted competition and defense of the status quo were in accord with biological selection. The poor were the “unfit” and should not be aided; in the struggle for existence, wealth was a sign of success. At the societal level, social Darwinism was used as a philosophical rationalization for imperialist, colonialist, and racist policies, sustaining belief in Anglo-Saxon or Aryan cultural and biological superiority. Social Darwinism declined during the 20th century as an expanded knowledge of biological, social, and cultural phenomena undermined, rather than supported, its basic tenets.

[@TaCtiCaL323]

@@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392 The funny part is you think I'm going to read that novel of dog feces you just wrote? I'm processing 59 pictures of the Andromeda galaxy at the moment. Foh with your bs lol.

[@AlexPerez-tt9ru]

Notice how petty Ken is about paulogia. He calls him "pollogia" while he says let's call Paul with no problem

[@EdwardHowton]

I've commented on this before, but I believe the mispronunciation is an intentional cult tactic meant to prevent cult victims who haven't had their curiosity completely beaten out of them from looking up outside references and discovering that they've been lied to. It's easier to misrepresent your betters, after all, if you keep talking about "Paulogia" but your victims only try to google "Polo Geea". Of course, Kent is a complete idiot and an incredible dullard, so the written form is there... but since Kent is functionally illiterate and believes he's the most superior being on the planet, I suspect he assumes his idiot victims can't read either. None of this is gratuitous insults, either; I have a list of reasons for why I think Kent was _at least_ functionally illiterate until the point he went to jail and _possibly_ was educated slightly during those nine years, and one of them overlaps with his low opinion of his cultists, when he had a giant slide projected on the wall behind him that read "A star, our Sun, was born" highlighted in yellow while he was pretending that entire page was about the beginning of the universe. It's a lot like Trump, really. Ever listen to him say 'China'? He sounds like he assumes he's the only person on the planet who has ever heard of the country. A whole lot of similarities with Kent. I could go on. For hours. Seriously.

[@thepresence365]

Well, he's a very petty person. It comes out in every video he makes "responding" to people.

[@Slum0vsky]

'Dr' is a petty person, he's noted for his 'National Pornographic' etc nicknames.

[@Virtualblueart]

IIRC it's a tactic to insta demean and/or irritate or enrage your opponent by refusing to use his/her correct name. He also does this to most of his opponents. I remember him insisting calling Aron some other name or at best Aaron like the bible character. Its a childish stupid thing to do that damages your own credibility and is used by people who believe their target is as vulnerable to these petty tactics like they are.

[@Ugly_German_Truths]

@@Virtualblueart HE calls Aron Ra "A(a)ron Nelson" which was his birthname, that he legally changed for various reasons. To Which Aron Ra replied with the now famous "Inmate #06452-017" as Kent's legally correct name ;-) But then Kent is Doctor DUNNO ... so he has a lot of standards to not pass!

[@MiikeJone]

This was an amazing piece of journalism if I do say so myself Paul! I would love to see more people cover stuff like this.

[@hewasfuzzywuzzy3583]

Ah yes, the straw man argument. I mean, the Hovind argument. See, anyone could start with a straw man argument but I dare Kent Hovind to start an argument with a steel man argument. I dare you Kent!

[@Hollymidlife]

I'm taking this saying from a drama channel I frequent, but it applies here... Kent Hovind is the most bothered unbothered person. But I'm a girl, so consider my opinion invalid...😏

[@Paulogia]

Kent would advise you to "stick to make-up, honey".

[@MythlyInari]

@Walter Melon Bruce was just explaining what she meant in case you didn't understand, no need to be bitter.

[@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392]

i agree your woman that makes you stupid . evolution is pseudoscience from 19th century used by dogmatic atheist is justify their worldview a assualt against butalso a poltical idealogy . for communist and nas1 Social Darwinism social theory WRITTEN BY The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree.... See Article History Social Darwinism, the theory that human groups and races are subject to the same laws of natural selection as Charles Darwin perceived in plants and animals in nature. According to the theory, which was popular in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the weak were diminished and their cultures delimited while the strong grew in power and cultural influence over the weak. Social Darwinists held that the life of humans in society was a struggle for existence ruled by “survival of the fittest,” a phrase proposed by the British philosopher and scientist Herbert Spencer. …form of evolutionary ethics is social Darwinism, though this view owes far more to Herbert Spencer than it does to Darwin himself. It begins... The social Darwinists-notably Spencer and Walter Bagehot in England and William Graham Sumner in the United States-believed that the process of natural selection acting on variations in the population would result in the survival of the best competitors and in continuing improvement in the population. Societies were viewed as organisms that evolve in this manner. The theory was used to support laissez-faire capitalism and political conservatism. Class stratification was justified on the basis of “natural” inequalities among individuals, for the control of property was said to be a correlate of superior and inherent moral attributes such as industriousness, temperance, and frugality. Attempts to reform society through state intervention or other means would, therefore, interfere with natural processes; unrestricted competition and defense of the status quo were in accord with biological selection. The poor were the “unfit” and should not be aided; in the struggle for existence, wealth was a sign of success. At the societal level, social Darwinism was used as a philosophical rationalization for imperialist, colonialist, and racist policies, sustaining belief in Anglo-Saxon or Aryan cultural and biological superiority. Social Darwinism declined during the 20th century as an expanded knowledge of biological, social, and cultural phenomena undermined, rather than supported, its basic tenets. ALPHABET pple are garbage . secondly pualogia is a fatass why is trying to claim other wise . also paulgia is little bitch who spends his entire life railing against something he claims does not exist wasting his time . if he really did not believe in GOD why is wasting his time and every thing is going to heat death of universe all he does in is vain why waste what time he has left . unless he is bitter against GOD you pple are not atheist/agnostics other wise you would not care your satanists . like the communist movement . “My object in life is to dethrone God and destroy capitalism.” ~ Karl Marx for example the ple he hanged out with worshiped the devil . page 26 archive.org/details/MarxAndSatan/page/n24/mode/1up?q=russian Marx did not often speak publicly about metaphysics, but we can gather his views from the men with whom he associated. One of his partners in the First International was Mikhail Bakunin, a Russian anarchist, who wrote: The Evil One is the satanic revolt against divine authority, revolt in which we see the fecund germ of all human emancipations, the revolution. Socialists recognise each other by the words "In the name of the one to whom a great wrong has been done." Satan [is] the eternal rebel, the first freethinker and the emancipator of worlds. He makes man ashamed of his bestial ignorance and obedience; he emancipates him, stamps upon his brow the seal of liberty and humanity, in urging him to disobey and eat of the fruit of knowledge. Bakunin does more than praise Lucifer. He has a concrete program of revolution, butnot one that would free the poor from exploitation. He writes: In this revolution we will have to awaken the Devil in the people, to stir up the basest passions. Our mission is to destroy, not to edify. The passion of destruction is a creative passion. Marx, along with Bakunin, formed the First International and endorsed this strange program. Marx and Engels said in The Communist Manifesto that the proletarian sees law, morality, and religion as "so many bourgeois prejudices, behind which lurk in ambush just as many bourgeois interests." archive.org/details/MarxAndSatan/page/n11/mode/2up made in a poem called "The Player," later downplayed by both himself and his followers: The hellish vapors rise and fill the brain, Till I go mad and my heart is utterly changed. See this sword? The prince of darkness Sold it to me. For me he beats the time and gives the signs. Ever more boldly I play the dance of death.'? this is why said he satanist . him and his ilk

[@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392]

@@Pie3.1 i want to test creation material .

[@Pie3.1]

@@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392 my sincere apologies, I thought you were arguing for evolution....

[@fudgesauce]

It really strikes me how unchristian Hovind is. Do any of his Christian followers call him out for his mockery and belittling of others, and his pridefulness?

[@FirstOfTheYear777]

In their minds it isn’t pride if they’re right. Which of course they whole heartedly believe they are. I’m a former believer and I have been told some incredibly prideful and ridiculous things the person telling me always justified as “I’m not telling you this, God is.” My evangelical parents will readily mock Scientology or any other religion for their ridiculous beliefs while simultaneously not applying the same standards to their own beliefs. It’s crazy

[@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392]

you pple deny the law of biognesis and also deny basic biology that life is biological machine as like car . compose of various parts that are interdependent and if single part is missing the system fails . or if merely a single part the miissing the rest of system it does not work . f0r example human heart liver lung kidney blood brain . etc if one part is missing whole system fails and if merely a heart it does not work either it merely failurs . you need instantaneous generation of human for reason given one part missing the system fails and if merely one part the system just like car it has fuel pump as like human heart and this true it single cell level DNA stores the information , ribosome decodes the DNA ATP powers process , if one part of system is missing such dna you cannot replicate the machinery because information to recreate it store on dna so through its life cycle . without leaving replicates of itself . so it does not exist nor does a copy so bacteria levease existence . but also ribomseome you could not get information out of single cell without it and so sellf cannot replicate and dies of off without leaving replices of itself . ATP powers that process of riboseome decoding the dna with out ithe process does not work . so if one parts missing the system fails and if merely one part it merely degrades such as DNA it cannot do anything on its own . for example a virus is bacteriaphage and DNA and bind to single cell and injects itself the DNA and hijacks the machinery and replicates it self until ruptures the cell . proving DNA on its own can do nothing . so requires instaous creation or it will fail and merely degenerate along with data on mutations causing cancer , expermintes done fruit files and bacteria showed the mutation are merely degenerative to genetic code . and data on human demonstrate mutation are degenerative . such chernoble and fallujah and Vietnam . the mutation merely caused deformities or they died as like in fruit fly and bacteria experiments . life requires instouse creation . because is it system of parts and one part on its own can do nothing and system missing one part can do nothing either . but mutation degenerative meaning that single cell come into existence enough generation and organism the genetic code degenerates over long enough period and goes out existence . so evolution is false the law of biogenesis life comes from life so non life does no turn to life . and something cannot come from nothing so idea of universe created itself is false . anyway evolution is pseudoscience from 19th century used by dogmatic atheist is justify their worldview a assault against but also a political ideology .

[@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392]

anyway evolution is pseudoscience from 19th century used by dogmatic atheist is justify their worldview a assault against but also a political ideology . for communist and nas1 Social Darwinism social theory WRITTEN BY The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree.... See Article History Social Darwinism, the theory that human groups and races are subject to the same laws of natural selection as Charles Darwin perceived in plants and animals in nature. According to the theory, which was popular in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the weak were diminished and their cultures delimited while the strong grew in power and cultural influence over the weak. Social Darwinists held that the life of humans in society was a struggle for existence ruled by “survival of the fittest,” a phrase proposed by the British philosopher and scientist Herbert Spencer. …form of evolutionary ethics is social Darwinism, though this view owes far more to Herbert Spencer than it does to Darwin himself. It begins... The social Darwinists-notably Spencer and Walter Bagehot in England and William Graham Sumner in the United States-believed that the process of natural selection acting on variations in the population would result in the survival of the best competitors and in continuing improvement in the population. Societies were viewed as organisms that evolve in this manner. The theory was used to support laissez-faire capitalism and political conservatism. Class stratification was justified on the basis of “natural” inequalities among individuals, for the control of property was said to be a correlate of superior and inherent moral attributes such as industriousness, temperance, and frugality. Attempts to reform society through state intervention or other means would, therefore, interfere with natural processes; unrestricted competition and defense of the status quo were in accord with biological selection. The poor were the “unfit” and should not be aided; in the struggle for existence, wealth was a sign of success. At the societal level, social Darwinism was used as a philosophical rationalization for imperialist, colonialist, and racist policies, sustaining belief in Anglo-Saxon or Aryan cultural and biological superiority. Social Darwinism declined during the 20th century as an expanded knowledge of biological, social, and cultural phenomena undermined, rather than supported, its basic tenets. ALPHABET pple are garbage . secondly pualogia is a fatass why is trying to claim other wise . also paulgia is little bitch who spends his entire life railing against something he claims does not exist wasting his time . if he really did not believe in GOD why is wasting his time and every thing is going to heat death of universe all he does in is vain why waste what time he has left . unless he is bitter against GOD you pple are not atheist/agnostics other wise you would not care your satanists . like the communist movement . “My object in life is to dethrone God and destroy capitalism.” ~ Karl Marx for example the ple he hanged out with worshiped the devil . page 26 archive.org/details/MarxAndSatan/page/n24/mode/1up?q=russian Marx did not often speak publicly about metaphysics, but we can gather his views from the men with whom he associated. One of his partners in the First International was Mikhail Bakunin, a Russian anarchist, who wrote: The Evil One is the satanic revolt against divine authority, revolt in which we see the fecund germ of all human emancipations, the revolution. Socialists recognise each other by the words "In the name of the one to whom a great wrong has been done." Satan [is] the eternal rebel, the first freethinker and the emancipator of worlds. He makes man ashamed of his bestial ignorance and obedience; he emancipates him, stamps upon his brow the seal of liberty and humanity, in urging him to disobey and eat of the fruit of knowledge. Bakunin does more than praise Lucifer. He has a concrete program of revolution, butnot one that would free the poor from exploitation. He writes: In this revolution we will have to awaken the Devil in the people, to stir up the basest passions. Our mission is to destroy, not to edify. The passion of destruction is a creative passion. Marx, along with Bakunin, formed the First International and endorsed this strange program. Marx and Engels said in The Communist Manifesto that the proletarian sees law, morality, and religion as "so many bourgeois prejudices, behind which lurk in ambush just as many bourgeois interests."

[@fudgesauce]

@@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392 -- It is creationism, not evolution, that posits all functional parts of a creature were created all at once, with all their interdependencies locked in place. Evolution explains how such interdependencies can arise without requiring an intelligence to orchestrate it. Likewise, it is silly when Ray Comfort asks "which evolved first: the male dog or the female dog?" It betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of evolution if you think this is a quandary.

[@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392]

​@@fudgesauce for naturalism to be true . you must beleive something came from nothing . which wrong time space matter and energy came into existence so how can that which does not exist bring itself into existence . it cannot then universe new universe dust gathered together and form a stone either promodial soup a vent or crystal . then caused non life to to life . firstly which one was it ? and how itll prove it ? . as law of biogensis states non lifes does not turn to life . and nobody over 150 years has done so the law of biogenesis is rock solid . and then must a single over countless generation through mutation and natural selection accumilate mutation increasing the information of genetic code from simple to complex and turn from single cell to monkey . but as previosusly mentioned i system ofparts one part missing and whole system fails as like heart liver lung kidney brain blood etc . and if merely one part such as heart it can do nothing as it is a part of system . same with the single cell ATP RIBOMSOME DNA. if any of parts of missing it cannot replicate the cell and merely one part it can do nothing as dna cannot replicate itself . now then evolution . the dna code must increase in infomtion as organism get more advanced more infomation is need so increasing in complexity . becuase if it was stagnant and remained bacteria it would never go beyond a bacteria then evolution is false as there is no means from single to monkey to human . evolution would be false Mutagen From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In genetics, a mutagen is a physical or chemical agent that changes the genetic material, usually DNA, of an organism and thus increases the frequency of mutations above the natural background level. As many mutations can cause cancer, mutagens are therefore also likely to be carcinogens, although not always necessarily so. All mutagens have characteristic mutational signatures with some chemicals becoming mutagenic through cellular processes. Not all mutations are caused by mutagens: so-called "spontaneous mutations" occur due to spontaneous hydrolysis, errors in DNA replication, repair and recombination. so mutagen do not cause mutation they merely accelerate them or intensify them . so question is does mutation add infomation or cause the loss of it . is increasing the complexity of gentic code or decreasing it stagnant is same as decreasing meaning single does not change from single cell to something more complex but rather stay the same meaning evolution is false . . now we have data on bacteria and fruit files as well as human data . chernbole fallujah and vietname and result is mutation merely cause the lose of genetic infomation resulting in defomtires or the organism dies . now then in 1980s they experimented on fruit files and bacteria the purposfully tried to mutate them . and results was deformites or died and no matter how many gneration they remained the same . the same result we got from fruit files and bacteria as did thehuman that were affect by mutagens such as radiation and chemcial agens ( agent orange ) www.icr.org/article/no-fruit-fly-evolution-even-after-600/ No Fruit Fly Evolution Even after 600 Generations BY BRIAN THOMAS, PH.D. * | TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2010 Many Americans believe that the big-picture story of evolution, as biology professors routinely expound it, is false.1 Basically, they haven't bought into the concept that all life descended from one common ancestor that miraculously sprang into being millions of years ago. And that makes sense, considering there are no real examples of that kind of evolution. If evolutionary biologists could document such evolution in action, they could vindicate their worldview and cite real research to support their surreal claims. In 1980, this search for proof led researchers to painstakingly and purposefully mutate each core gene involved in fruit fly development. The now classic work, for which the authors won the Nobel Prize in 1995, was published in Nature.2 The experiments proved that the mutation of any of these core developmental genes―mutations that would be essential for the fruit fly to evolve into any other creature―merely resulted in dead or deformed fruit flies. This therefore showed that fruit flies could not evolve. Similarly, Michigan State University evolutionary biologists Richard Lenski and his colleagues searched for signs of evolution in bacteria for 20 years, tracking 40,000 generations.3 In the end, the species that they started with was hobbled by accumulated mutations, and the only changes that had occurred were degenerative. University of Bristol emeritus professor of bacteriology Alan Linton summarized the situation: the same results from baceteria and fruit files were also demonstrated on humans when chernbole incident occured the pple who effected got cancer and their offspring badly deformed . along with animals the mutation copying error and deleterious . the loss of information chernobylguide.com/chernobyl_mutations/ also in fallujah the same results from chernoble as demonstrated in fruit files exspermintes they merely become defomred or die . Fallujah birth defects: A toxic remnant of the US invasion of Iraq? kzbin.info/www/bejne/e4Wvi3ile9NgosU as well Vietnam the same results . Vietnam: My orange pain (RT Documentary) kzbin.info/www/bejne/bJLYZ4ygbbB5b80 so life is biological machine composed of parts and system . and mutagen merely intensify the mutation or accelerate them . so it merely speed up the degenerative process . that is what radiation or other mutagen do cause mutation . the are copying error the lost of genetic information. the speed up a eventual extinction of all life . so natural selection select what is already there . speciation merely gives variety within a kind so a dog dog a cow a cow a cat cat etc . mutation are merely copying error the loss of genetic information. so life is biological machine and mutation cause genetic decay . every generation accrues more mutation and genetic deformities and eventually extinction . that is what evidence says the mutation merely cause genetic decay . and eventually existions of life so something cannot from nothing non life does not turn to life ( law of biogenesis ) and monkey does not turn to man ( as like is biolgoical machine and mutation merely cause genetic decay and eventually loss of infomation ) .

[@thelegasy]

"Everything's Disney." Oh my god, that just made my day!

[@Katarnis]

So Kent doesn't want to pay taxes but is happy to waist other taxpayer's money in BS court fillings. What a spoon.

[@kenbee1957]

"A forklift, a pocket knife and my underwear....." Sounds like a fun weekend

[@phillyphakename1255]

What's going on at Eric's house, a hydraulically actuated wedgie? And then he cuts the guy down with a pocketknife?

[@osvaldogreco]

I wasn't prepared for that!

[@Unsensitive]

I can only hope they start charging punitive damages to kent for the frivolousness of his lawauits. Then when he refuses to pay, put him in jail again.

[@Ugly_German_Truths]

Even without punitive damages the fees for a 500 million lawsuit that gets dismissed to him having to pay for it, would be horrendously high...

[@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392]

you pple deny the law of biognesis and also deny basic biology that life is biological machine as like car . compose of various parts that are interdependent and if single part is missing the system fails . or if merely a single part the miissing the rest of system it does not work . f0r example human heart liver lung kidney blood brain . etc if one part is missing whole system fails and if merely a heart it does not work either it merely failurs . you need instantaneous generation of human for reason given one part missing the system fails and if merely one part the system just like car it has fuel pump as like human heart and this true it single cell level DNA stores the information , ribosome decodes the DNA ATP powers process , if one part of system is missing such dna you cannot replicate the machinery because information to recreate it store on dna so through its life cycle . without leaving replicates of itself . so it does not exist nor does a copy so bacteria levease existence . but also ribomseome you could not get information out of single cell without it and so sellf cannot replicate and dies of off without leaving replices of itself . ATP powers that process of riboseome decoding the dna with out ithe process does not work . so if one parts missing the system fails and if merely one part it merely degrades such as DNA it cannot do anything on its own . for example a virus is bacteriaphage and DNA and bind to single cell and injects itself the DNA and hijacks the machinery and replicates it self until ruptures the cell . proving DNA on its own can do nothing . so requires instaous creation or it will fail and merely degenerate along with data on mutations causing cancer , expermintes done fruit files and bacteria showed the mutation are merely degenerative to genetic code . and data on human demonstrate mutation are degenerative . such chernoble and fallujah and Vietnam . the mutation merely caused deformities or they died as like in fruit fly and bacteria experiments . life requires instouse creation . because is it system of parts and one part on its own can do nothing and system missing one part can do nothing either . but mutation degenerative meaning that single cell come into existence enough generation and organism the genetic code degenerates over long enough period and goes out existence . so evolution is false the law of biogenesis life comes from life so non life does no turn to life . and something cannot come from nothing so idea of universe created itself is false . anyway evolution is pseudoscience from 19th century used by dogmatic atheist is justify their worldview a assault against but also a political ideology .

[@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392]

anyway evolution is pseudoscience from 19th century used by dogmatic atheist is justify their worldview a assault against but also a political ideology . for communist and nas1 Social Darwinism social theory WRITTEN BY The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree.... See Article History Social Darwinism, the theory that human groups and races are subject to the same laws of natural selection as Charles Darwin perceived in plants and animals in nature. According to the theory, which was popular in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the weak were diminished and their cultures delimited while the strong grew in power and cultural influence over the weak. Social Darwinists held that the life of humans in society was a struggle for existence ruled by “survival of the fittest,” a phrase proposed by the British philosopher and scientist Herbert Spencer. …form of evolutionary ethics is social Darwinism, though this view owes far more to Herbert Spencer than it does to Darwin himself. It begins... The social Darwinists-notably Spencer and Walter Bagehot in England and William Graham Sumner in the United States-believed that the process of natural selection acting on variations in the population would result in the survival of the best competitors and in continuing improvement in the population. Societies were viewed as organisms that evolve in this manner. The theory was used to support laissez-faire capitalism and political conservatism. Class stratification was justified on the basis of “natural” inequalities among individuals, for the control of property was said to be a correlate of superior and inherent moral attributes such as industriousness, temperance, and frugality. Attempts to reform society through state intervention or other means would, therefore, interfere with natural processes; unrestricted competition and defense of the status quo were in accord with biological selection. The poor were the “unfit” and should not be aided; in the struggle for existence, wealth was a sign of success. At the societal level, social Darwinism was used as a philosophical rationalization for imperialist, colonialist, and racist policies, sustaining belief in Anglo-Saxon or Aryan cultural and biological superiority. Social Darwinism declined during the 20th century as an expanded knowledge of biological, social, and cultural phenomena undermined, rather than supported, its basic tenets. ALPHABET pple are garbage . secondly pualogia is a fatass why is trying to claim other wise . also paulgia is little bitch who spends his entire life railing against something he claims does not exist wasting his time . if he really did not believe in GOD why is wasting his time and every thing is going to heat death of universe all he does in is vain why waste what time he has left . unless he is bitter against GOD you pple are not atheist/agnostics other wise you would not care your satanists . like the communist movement . “My object in life is to dethrone God and destroy capitalism.” ~ Karl Marx for example the ple he hanged out with worshiped the devil . page 26 archive.org/details/MarxAndSatan/page/n24/mode/1up?q=russian Marx did not often speak publicly about metaphysics, but we can gather his views from the men with whom he associated. One of his partners in the First International was Mikhail Bakunin, a Russian anarchist, who wrote: The Evil One is the satanic revolt against divine authority, revolt in which we see the fecund germ of all human emancipations, the revolution. Socialists recognise each other by the words "In the name of the one to whom a great wrong has been done." Satan [is] the eternal rebel, the first freethinker and the emancipator of worlds. He makes man ashamed of his bestial ignorance and obedience; he emancipates him, stamps upon his brow the seal of liberty and humanity, in urging him to disobey and eat of the fruit of knowledge. Bakunin does more than praise Lucifer. He has a concrete program of revolution, butnot one that would free the poor from exploitation. He writes: In this revolution we will have to awaken the Devil in the people, to stir up the basest passions. Our mission is to destroy, not to edify. The passion of destruction is a creative passion. Marx, along with Bakunin, formed the First International and endorsed this strange program. Marx and Engels said in The Communist Manifesto that the proletarian sees law, morality, and religion as "so many bourgeois prejudices, behind which lurk in ambush just as many bourgeois interests."

[@bobmudge4836]

“Respected creationists?” Good one!

[@johnmcnairn6822]

wow!!...a lot of suing going on!

[@Fanny-Fanny]

I think that makes Kent a Sewer... ...I'll get my coat...

[@Paulogia]

ha!

[@ltraina3353]

I really can’t stand these people who have personally benefitted from the freedoms the US provides them,, then they don’t want to pay ANY taxes. They can’t manage to give back to the country that was so generous to them. They just leave that to the rest of us. It really irks me that they feel like they DESERVE a free ride. It’s a selfish attitude that I don’t think their god (if he was real) would appreciate!

[@BluePhoenix_]

Kent needs to learn that, no taxes no: Streets Police Firefighters Not any public "free" services No teacheeeeeeeeeee.... Oooh, of course. The evil public schools...

[@Virtualblueart]

"keep your head down and you don't get whacked." Now there is a loving christian message I remember from my youth. One that got me to doubt the whole christian deal.

[@budrome4247]

As someone who identified and investigated structuring transactions for years, I am impressed the govmt actually charged, tried and convicted anyone. Wow.

[@kirkrjb]

all I can say is Kent taught his son well and got grifted out his money

[@Nixeu42]

I'm not the biggest fan of Eric Hovind, but I very much appreciate how poetic that revenge is. Kent physically and emotionally abused the sh*t out of Eric when he was a child, so it's oddly satisfying to see Eric getting one over on his old man.

[@weldabar]

So, scam-artist dad raises a scam-artist son. I didn't know, but it's no surprise.

[@Bill_Garthright]

I hope that the Trumps and the Hovinds never inter-marry. I'm not a big believer in genetic determinism, but that would be just tempting fate! :)

[@Nixeu42]

Given that Kent was an emotionally and physically abusive father, at least when it comes to Eric scamming Kent, I'm kinda cool with it. Especially if he stays within the bounds of the law.

[@guiagaston7273]

Damn I always new he was bad, but that thing about the boy drowning is just too much.

[@kathryngeeslin9509]

He was very cold about it at the time, thinking/acting only for his own business and profit.

[@Nixeu42]

This is the man happily admitted that he spanked his young son excessively, to the point where he was a sobbing wreck, and threatened to do it all day, despite how much obvious pain the kid (Eric) was in, just because he was having trouble sitting still for a dental lidocaine injection. He bragged about how wanted his son to "be more afraid of [him] than anything in the world". Judging by how little his family seems to want to do with him anymore, including Eric and Kent's ex-wife, I don't think that mindset was exclusively applied to Eric.

[@MiikeJone]

Look at the true and righteous Christians fighting over all the money other people donated to them. Such courageous and honest people.

[@Nixeu42]

Honestly? Eric screwing Kent over (assuming that's what you're talking about) is probably about more than just money. If you've seen Logicked's series about Kent, you've probably heard that wonderful little story Kent told about spanking the sh*t out of his son for having trouble staying still for the dentist, and how his son is "more afraid of him that anything in the world", and how Kent wanted it that way. What may not have clicked is the fact that the son mentioned is Eric. Yeah, Kent's an absolute slime bag, and Eric screwing him over is just karma and poetic vengeance, in my eyes. A father utterly terrifying and emotional traumatizing his child like that deserves for that kid to screw them over in the future.

[@greendragonreprised6885]

I don't understand how someone who claims not to be subject to the law can issue proceedings in a court.

[@raymondsanders3584]

Plus he isn’t very Christian when he calls others names and ridicules others like he does.

[@Kevin_Williamson]

Kent really thinks alot of himself. He honestly thinks his silly "whacking" videos have any real effect on any atheist? Like his opinion carries any weight beyond his fan base? Pride's a sin Kent.

[@swolejeezy2603]

Not sure what his academic qualifications are (not that academic qualifications are everything) but he certainly is not an authority on most if not all things he always talks about

[@EdwardHowton]

The only way Kent knows how to enforce his authority is to beat children. Since atheists aren't children, could kick his ass on a bad day, and are out of reach in any case, he resorts to beating up children's _toys_ instead.

[@zacbranagan8939]

@@swolejeezy2603 He's got a doctorate from a Christian diploma mill, or equivalent, and wrote a "thesis" after receiving his doctorate and it is awful.

[@seraphinaaizen6278]

No, he doesn't. He doesn't produce anything for an atheist audience or with any illusion that his antics will convince any atheists. He produces content for his brainwashed, mouth breathing audience that will take everything he says at face value and continue giving him money and buying his products. Hovind is a con-artist. He is arguably the slimiest of all the creationist apologetics and he is certainly the most dishonest (and that's up against some serious competition).

[@munstrumridcully]

@@seraphinaaizen6278 Right? I always waffle between Kent and Ken Ham as the slimiest, most dishonest creationist mouthpieces. Cheers :)

[@SadisticSenpai61]

Huh. The more I hear about what Eric did to salvage his family funds and save the family, the more I respect his business savvy. He's still a despicable grifter, but he's at least smart and is careful to do everything legally. But perhaps the most amazing part to me is that Kent is so morally bankrupt and despicable that he makes Eric look nice. I grew up in a group of fundie evangelical Baptists that would have viewed a lot of Kent's theology as heresy (and they view the NIFB the same way), so I never heard about Kent until after I left Christianity and started getting into KZbin Atheism, which was about 2009-2011. By that point, there were a few times ppl would go over one of his old videos, but overall he was mostly a tiny blip on ppl's radar as he was in prison and had lost most of his following (which had moved on to his son's ministry or to AiG). I do remember going to a presentation from Ken Ham. It was probably around 2006-2007, I don't remember really. I remember Dad wasn't very impressed, but Dad also really enjoys watching nature documentaries (despite being a creationist AFAIK) so he more than likely found Ken's understanding of biology and nature to be childish at best. I believe someone from AiG also came to the Bible College I was attending at the time too. There was a lot of criticism from the students as well, although it was primarily focused on Biblical accuracy. It was the professional evangelist that got the most scrutiny from my classmates - pretty much everyone thought his "sermons" were pathetic, poorly structured, and had little to no basis in the Bible. I guess he heard the complaints, cuz he tried to include more Bible verses in later sermons (he was there for a "revival week") and then got completely roasted by the student body because he took the verses completely out of context and tried to make completely inane points that had almost nothing to do with what the verses actually said. Sorry, I got lost in the weeds there. Preaching to ppl that are actively studying the Bible and learning how to preach (the men anyway, although I bet many of us women could prepare sermons just as well) can't be easy. And we clearly intimidated a lot of the guest speakers - especially if they had to give multiple sermons to us.

[@LisaAnn777]

Out of curiosity if your dad's a creationist does he believe in young earth it old earth creationism where he accepts evolution? And what does he think about the flood, was it a literal event and Noah really had thousands or millions of species on a 500ft boat? I just don't understand how any creationist can accept these huge holes in the theory.

[@SadisticSenpai61]

@@LisaAnn777 He's officially YEC, literalist, etc. But honestly, given how much he loves nature documentaries and scientific discoveries, I suspect a good portion of that is for show in order to keep the peace with everyone around him. Dad tends to keep a lot of his opinions and ideas to himself.

[@LisaAnn777]

@@SadisticSenpai61 I don't understand how anyone can think the flood happened like that. I've heard people like Ken Ham say there were thousands of species on board, but how exactly would those fit? Plus the food and freshwater? Seems a bit crazy to me lol

[@SadisticSenpai61]

@@LisaAnn777 I'm fairly certain my family dismisses the details as "miracle" or whatever. Like I said, I'm not actually certain how much Dad actually believes that stuff. But he grew up in the YEC cult, his wife in is the YEC cult, his kids were raised in the YEC cult, etc... And yes, having been raised YEC, it is very much a cult - even though it may not really seem like it until one finally gets free from it. They're very insular and they've very careful about cultivating their echo chamber and making sure that members have all kinds of tools at their disposal to automatically dismiss anything that might contradict their views - I've been through it myself. It's almost a trained call and respond in a way. You hear the words that tell you an argument over YEC/evolution is coming and you stop listening and just start spouting talking points. The only things you really listen for are key words which tell you which canned answer you should use. And most importantly, you never ever spend time thinking about what "evolutionists" say after the fact. Oh and they also try to keep as much of your relationships within the group as possible in order to put that added pressure on members to keep them from leaving. If everyone you're close to and rely on socially, financially, emotionally, etc are all in that group, you can't openly disagree with that group for fear of being kicked out and having that support group cut off from you. It's not exactly shunning, but it's really not that dissimilar. I've definitely seen pastors encourage members not to tolerate "heresy" in their homes and in their close relationships. YEC cults tend to hover right on the edge of cult behavior. They're not overly controlling or involved in personal lives for the most part (although there's definitely churches that do go down that route), but at the same time they want to control what you think and believe about the world around you and heavily encourage members to limit their "exposure" to "the World" as much as possible. And if you leave the group? Unless you're rejoining the group and admitting you were wrong, they want nothing to do with you. Marrying anyone outside the group is very heavily frowned upon as well - so you'll have pressure from your spouse, kids, in-laws, etc to stay in the group with the threat that you may lose some of the most important relationships to you if you no longer believe. There's a lot of social pressure put on members to conform. It's very hard to walk away when you know it'll mean being ostracized from everyone you know. Remember, most YEC groups insist that you can't be a "True" Christian if you accept evolution. They will often treat members who move in that direction as though they have left Christianity. But there's also some that say it's not a salvation issue. I think my parents would fall into that category, but at the same time they would definitely keep their distance from those who do accept evolution - or at least no longer be quite as friendly/open with them. There would be an awkwardness there and topics that they're clearly trying to avoid mentioning. Kinda like when they interact with Methodists, Presbyterians, and Lutherans: "I understand that you're saved and going to heaven, but that's about the only thing you've got right about Christianity. I'm going to keep discussions as general as I can to avoid arguing." For the record, my parents are General Association of Regular Baptist Churches (GARBC) version of Baptists. They can't stand the Independent Fundamentalist Baptists (IFB or their spin off group NIFB) - after all, those guys are Calvinists! And everyone knows Calvinists are weird elitists, rude, and just generally awful ppl. They are _not_ good representations of Christianity or Christ's love. 😂

[@you2uber220]

Here we got court fee of 2.5% of the sum claimed. This make people think twice before filing 500 million dollar lawsuits... 12.5 million dollar is a pretty hefty sum to pay for filing such a claim...

[@justindoud8842]

I feel like we should just bookmark real quick the New Testament teaches rather unambiguously that you’re supposed to pay your taxes and obey the government.

[@ablebaker8664]

Hovind: "Reality conforms to my beliefs and desires." Reality: "No, Kent. It really doesn't."

[@stylis666]

Kent's life and criminal life in one nutshell XD Well done!

[@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392]

it does you pple deny the law of biognesis and also deny basic biology that life is biological machine as like car . compose of various parts that are interdependent and if single part is missing the system fails . or if merely a single part the miissing the rest of system it does not work . f0r example human heart liver lung kidney blood brain . etc if one part is missing whole system fails and if merely a heart it does not work either it merely failurs . you need instantaneous generation of human for reason given one part missing the system fails and if merely one part the system just like car it has fuel pump as like human heart and this true it single cell level DNA stores the information , ribosome decodes the DNA ATP powers process , if one part of system is missing such dna you cannot replicate the machinery because information to recreate it store on dna so through its life cycle . without leaving replicates of itself . so it does not exist nor does a copy so bacteria levease existence . but also ribomseome you could not get information out of single cell without it and so sellf cannot replicate and dies of off without leaving replices of itself . ATP powers that process of riboseome decoding the dna with out ithe process does not work . so if one parts missing the system fails and if merely one part it merely degrades such as DNA it cannot do anything on its own . for example a virus is bacteriaphage and DNA and bind to single cell and injects itself the DNA and hijacks the machinery and replicates it self until ruptures the cell . proving DNA on its own can do nothing . so requires instaous creation or it will fail and merely degenerate along with data on mutations causing cancer , expermintes done fruit files and bacteria showed the mutation are merely degenerative to genetic code . and data on human demonstrate mutation are degenerative . such chernoble and fallujah and Vietnam . the mutation merely caused deformities or they died as like in fruit fly and bacteria experiments . life requires instouse creation . because is it system of parts and one part on its own can do nothing and system missing one part can do nothing either . but mutation degenerative meaning that single cell come into existence enough generation and organism the genetic code degenerates over long enough period and goes out existence . so evolution is false the law of biogenesis life comes from life so non life does no turn to life . and something cannot come from nothing so idea of universe created itself is false . anyway evolution is pseudoscience from 19th century used by dogmatic atheist is justify their worldview a assault against but also a political ideology . for communist and nas1 Social Darwinism social theory WRITTEN BY The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree.... See Article History Social Darwinism, the theory that human groups and races are subject to the same laws of natural selection as Charles Darwin perceived in plants and animals in nature. According to the theory, which was popular in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the weak were diminished and their cultures delimited while the strong grew in power and cultural influence over the weak. Social Darwinists held that the life of humans in society was a struggle for existence ruled by “survival of the fittest,” a phrase proposed by the British philosopher and scientist Herbert Spencer. …form of evolutionary ethics is social Darwinism, though this view owes far more to Herbert Spencer than it does to Darwin himself. It begins... The social Darwinists-notably Spencer and Walter Bagehot in England and William Graham Sumner in the United States-believed that the process of natural selection acting on variations in the population would result in the survival of the best competitors and in continuing improvement in the population. Societies were viewed as organisms that evolve in this manner. The theory was used to support laissez-faire capitalism and political conservatism. Class stratification was justified on the basis of “natural” inequalities among individuals, for the control of property was said to be a correlate of superior and inherent moral attributes such as industriousness, temperance, and frugality. Attempts to reform society through state intervention or other means would, therefore, interfere with natural processes; unrestricted competition and defense of the status quo were in accord with biological selection. The poor were the “unfit” and should not be aided; in the struggle for existence, wealth was a sign of success. At the societal level, social Darwinism was used as a philosophical rationalization for imperialist, colonialist, and racist policies, sustaining belief in Anglo-Saxon or Aryan cultural and biological superiority. Social Darwinism declined during the 20th century as an expanded knowledge of biological, social, and cultural phenomena undermined, rather than supported, its basic tenets. ALPHABET pple are garbage . secondly pualogia is a fatass why is trying to claim other wise . also paulgia is little bitch who spends his entire life railing against something he claims does not exist wasting his time . if he really did not believe in GOD why is wasting his time and every thing is going to heat death of universe all he does in is vain why waste what time he has left . unless he is bitter against GOD you pple are not atheist/agnostics other wise you would not care your satanists . like the communist movement . “My object in life is to dethrone God and destroy capitalism.” ~ Karl Marx for example the ple he hanged out with worshiped the devil . page 26 archive.org/details/MarxAndSatan/page/n24/mode/1up?q=russian Marx did not often speak publicly about metaphysics, but we can gather his views from the men with whom he associated. One of his partners in the First International was Mikhail Bakunin, a Russian anarchist, who wrote: The Evil One is the satanic revolt against divine authority, revolt in which we see the fecund germ of all human emancipations, the revolution. Socialists recognise each other by the words "In the name of the one to whom a great wrong has been done." Satan [is] the eternal rebel, the first freethinker and the emancipator of worlds. He makes man ashamed of his bestial ignorance and obedience; he emancipates him, stamps upon his brow the seal of liberty and humanity, in urging him to disobey and eat of the fruit of knowledge. Bakunin does more than praise Lucifer. He has a concrete program of revolution, butnot one that would free the poor from exploitation. He writes: In this revolution we will have to awaken the Devil in the people, to stir up the basest passions. Our mission is to destroy, not to edify. The passion of destruction is a creative passion. Marx, along with Bakunin, formed the First International and endorsed this strange program. Marx and Engels said in The Communist Manifesto that the proletarian sees law, morality, and religion as "so many bourgeois prejudices, behind which lurk in ambush just as many bourgeois interests."

[@ablebaker8664]

@@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392 Except... That isn't true. Nobody suggests that life in its current complexity sprang up whole cloth out of a primordial sea. Nobody, other than creationists claim complex life occurred suddenly... period. ...and nobody suggests that abiogenesis happens in current conditions. The primordial earth didn't have an oxygen atmosphere. It was a reducing atmosphere. We've demonstrated that under those conditions amino acids and nitrogenous bases result from the reactions produced... Nothing is required but cyclical changes in heat and these also self-polymerize. It isn't even a rare occurrence. We also know that various sugars and lipids also form spontaneously under conditions present on primordial earth. Complexity didn't have to arise suddenly. All that was required is that lipid vacuoles that form in a priordial soup, envelope a single strand of self catalytic RNA. The chances of a self-catalizing strand of RNA polymerizing spontaneously can be found by taking the shortest known self replicating strand and calculating its combinatorix. That strand is only a dozen nucleotides in length, and it isn't efficient.That probability works out to a certainty that that strand would form multiple times in a single liter of primordial soup, every day... In an ocean of 3.3x10²³ liters. Not merely a certainty it would ever form once. A certainty that shit-tons would form throughout the world's oceans every day. The probability that at least one strand would become enveloped in a lipid vacuole, is UNITY. Inevitable. Once this occurred the strand would be unable to escape the vacuole and would catalyze copies of itself rapidly from nitrogenous bases that diffused into the vacuole. As the number of copies increased the TDS of the liquid within the vacuole would increase creating on osmotic gradient. This would pull water in through the lipid membrane increasing the size of the vacuole and decreasing the surface tension holding the lipid membrane together. This would cause the membrane to either rupture or cleave. It makes no real difference which. This extremely short strand of RNA makes frequent mistakes in self-catylization. That necessitates that as it's making correct copies, it's also making other strands which may either have a different catalytic product, or it could be inert... and any of the strands present could spontaneously conjoin with any other, increasing the complexity of the strands and the probability that it would both catylize something different and increase in stability and efficiency. From these humble beginnings, the complexity of strands as well as their diversity would increase rapidly. THIS HAS BEEN REPRODUCED IN CONTROLLED CONDITIONS... It absolutely does work this way. At this point the only thing it would be able to do is reproduce. It would have all the building blocks present in the environment. The sun and atmosphere would provide spontaneous synthesis of more building blocks. The next thing that would have to occur is that APT or something similar enough to it in function would have to become embedded in the cell membrane. This provides a bioelectrical potential across the membrane which becomes a power source for rybozymes embed in the lipid membrane. As the complexity and diversity of RNA increases, the RNA that's embedded in the membrane increases, the number of chemical processes the vacuole could perform would also increase. Now... so, you don't get the opportunity to misconstrue this. This would all occur while the most basic self-reproducing vacuole was busy making copies of itself... Which means the oceans would become a zoo of diverse descendent strains of the original. These would interact and compete strictly on the basis of thermodynamic efficiency. The process would continue until examples arose with the emergent processes of very simple cells. These would begin to interact more often as they became more populace. Some, would absorb other vacuoles and in doing so, the strains would merge. Occasionally, an absorbed vacuole would even remain intact and inhabit the host vacuole and become functional organelles within the host... We know this has happened at least twice resulting in the absorption of a strain of cyanobacteria, which became chloroplasts, allowing this strain of emergent cell to photosynthethize AND fix carbon into useful sugars that the cell was then able to use both as fuel, and as construction material later as the ability to synthesize cellulose was acquired. It also occurred in the absorption of a strain of primitive Rickettsiae. This resulted in the emergent cell's ability to process and store ATP. We know these events occurred because Chloroplasts and mitochondria each have their own reproductive processes independent of the host cells they inhabit... and their genomes have been cataloged. They aren't organelles that spontaneously popped into existence. They are known species of primitive single celled organism that evolved independently from the host cell and later became organelles within eukaryotic life. Also occurring during all of this were the evolution of virons, viroids and viruses which played an additional role in introducing new, independently evolved genetic chemistry into primitive proto-life. These contributed the ability to produce histones and the ability to fold DNA, which arose as a consequence of RNA based life developing double stranded RNA... advantageous because it has greater long term genetic stability than strictly RNA based genetic processes. None of this requires intelligent intervention. It occurs for exactly the same reason that any chemical reaction produces predictable outcomes... because, reactions that have maximal entropy are less likely to be reversible than reactions that do not. No god is required. Just the heat from sunlight, liquid water, and a reducing atmosphere. This doesn't mean that a god doesn't exist. It just means that a god would be irrelevant as a requirement for the origins if life. Being created is possible, just completely unnecessary. On the other hand, a god creating these complex relationships suddenly out of nothing would require magic. Evidence exists to support every bit of this hypothesis. There are even portions of it that are experimentally reproducible. When was the last time you saw a clay doll animated to life? Do you suppose that primitive stories about clay dolls being brought to life by magic, might just be stories invented by the story tellers of primitive cultures in an attempt to explain the origins of life told by stone age people who had no idea about chemistry and thermodynamics and the mischief that carbon and nitrogen get up to without any help from a god?

[@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392]

​@@ablebaker8664 MY COMMENT PART 1 Able Baker Able Baker 2 days ago (edited) @THE ORATOR OF THE APOCALYPSE Except... That isn't true. Nobody suggests that life in its current complexity sprang up whole cloth out of a primordial sea. Nobody, other than creationists claim complex life occurred suddenly... period. ...and nobody suggests that abiogenesis happens in current conditions. We know these events occurred because Chloroplasts and mitochondria each have their own reproductive processes independent of the host cells they inhabit... and their genomes have been cataloged. They aren't organelles that spontaneously popped into existence. They are known species of primitive single celled organism that evolved independently from the host cell and later became organelles within eukaryotic life. my response fristly there are multple theories of how non life turned to life such as volcano vent or pormodial soup or from outerspace seeded life . or a crystal which one was it ? ., and how are you going to prove since non life does not turn to life ? . all this stuff is historical narrative . historical narrative and then using foresenics to try find evidence to support this historical narrative . real science is observation and experimentation hypothesis experimentation and obervation and confirming for refuting the hypthesis . from 14th century to the early 19th century science axiom was that GOD created universe . that universe was product of desing and order created by GOD . and that it was rational and orderly and we can learn about GOD through learning how it worked that prevailed from 14th century to early 19th century . Opposite to godliness is atheism in profession, and idolatry in practice. Atheism is so senseless and odious to mankind, that it never had many professors. Isaac Newton www.brainyquote.com/quotes/isaac_newton_753055 Atheism is so senseless. When I look at the solar system, I see the earth at the right distance from the sun to receive the proper amounts of heat and light. This did not happen by chance. Isaac Newton www.azquotes.com/author/10784-Isaac_Newton ​ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Kepler Kepler lived in an era when there was no clear distinction between astronomy and astrology, but there was a strong division between astronomy (a branch of mathematics within the liberal arts) and physics (a branch of natural philosophy). Kepler also incorporated religious arguments and reasoning into his work, motivated by the religious conviction and belief that God had created the world according to an intelligible plan that is accessible through the natural light of reason.[6] Kepler described his new astronomy as "celestial physics",[7] as "an excursion into Aristotle's Metaphysics",[8] and as "a supplement to Aristotle's On the Heavens",[9] transforming the ancient tradition of physical cosmology by treating astronomy as part of a universal mathematical physics.[10] libquotes.com/galileo-galilei/quotes/god I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use and by some other means to give us knowledge which we can attain by them. they beleived GOD created universe it was rational and orderly and well designed and it was knowable and we can learn about . we can learn about GOD this axiom prevailed from 14th century to early 19th century in was then after french revolution the war on GOD began . en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Origin_of_Species The book was written for non-specialist readers and attracted widespread interest upon its publication. As Darwin was an eminent scientist, his findings were taken seriously and the evidence he presented generated scientific, philosophical, and religious discussion. ((((((((((((The debate over the book contributed to the campaign by T. H. Huxley and his fellow members of the X Club to secularise science by promoting scientific naturalism)))))))))))))))))))). Within two decades there was widespread scientific agreement that evolution, with a branching pattern of common descent, had occurred, but scientists were slow to give natural selection the significance that Darwin thought appropriate. During "the eclipse of Darwinism" from the 1880s to the 1930s, various other mechanisms of evolution were given more credit. With the development of the modern evolutionary synthesis in the 1930s and 1940s, Darwin's concept of evolutionary adaptation through natural selection became central to modern evolutionary theory, and it has now become the unifying concept of the life sciences. it was used by rich pple to justify captilism . Social Darwinism Social Darwinism, the theory that human groups and races are subject to the same laws of natural selection as Charles Darwin perceived in plants and animals in nature. According to the theory, which was popular in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the weak were diminished and their cultures delimited while the strong grew in power and cultural influence over the weak. Social Darwinists held that the life of humans in society was a struggle for existence ruled by “survival of the fittest,” a phrase proposed by the British philosopher and scientist Herbert Spencer. …form of evolutionary ethics is social Darwinism, though this view owes far more to Herbert Spencer than it does to Darwin himself. It begins... The social Darwinists-notably Spencer and Walter Bagehot in England and William Graham Sumner in the United States-believed that the process of natural selection acting on variations in the population would result in the survival of the best competitors and in continuing improvement in the population. Societies were viewed as organisms that evolve in this manner. The theory was used to support laissez-faire capitalism and political conservatism. Class stratification was justified on the basis of “natural” inequalities among individuals, for the control of property was said to be a correlate of superior and inherent moral attributes such as industriousness, temperance, and frugality. Attempts to reform society through state intervention or other means would, therefore, interfere with natural processes; unrestricted competition and defense of the status quo were in accord with biological selection. The poor were the “unfit” and should not be aided; in the struggle for existence, wealth was a sign of success. At the societal level, social Darwinism was used as a philosophical rationalization for imperialist, colonialist, and racist policies, sustaining belief in Anglo-Saxon or Aryan cultural and biological superiority. Social Darwinism declined during the 20th century as an expanded knowledge of biological, social, and cultural phenomena undermined, rather than supported, its basic tenets. fristly life as now is all we know you cannot claim was simpler because the only life that exist is life that exist now . so there is no evidence for life being simpler then what we see now . and if you claim that life was simpler cannot be proven there is no evidence of that .. you spoke of spontaneous generation this false in 1859 the law of biogensis was dicovered . and nobody has disprove that law life comes from life . so your claim are false they cannot be proven they have over 150 years to do so it could be it would have been done by now . so your narratives is merely speculation . but also life is biological machine composed of varies parts and if one parts missing the system fails secondly RNA you refer to is ribosome weither they managed to do so means nothing . as dna can do nothing on its own it needs ribosome to decode and atp to power the process . to replicate machinery of cell then to split cell without dna you cannot copy the machinery of cell and so the cells dies with leaving a replicate and without being in eixstance so bacteria leaves existence . then without ribsome you cannot decode the DNA . without ATP you cannot power process . the virus is bacteriaphage and dna then binds to single cell then injects the dna hiajcs the machinary of cell and repliates itself till it ruptures the cell . so DNA cannot replicate itself on its own . and so ribosome can do nothing on its own . the single cannot create its own cell wall it is inheirted . without the molecules can react with parts of cells and destroy the single cell machinery destroying the single cell you said .

[@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392]

@@ablebaker8664 ​ @Able Baker MY COMMENT PART 1 you said . Also occurring during all of this were the evolution of virons, viroids and viruses which played an additional role in introducing new, independently evolved genetic chemistry into primitive proto-life. These contributed the ability to produce histones and the ability to fold DNA, which arose as a consequence of RNA based life developing double stranded RNA... advantageous because it has greater long term genetic stability than strictly RNA based genetic processes. None of this requires intelligent intervention. It occurs for exactly the same reason that any chemical reaction produces predictable outcomes... because, reactions that have maximal entropy are less likely to be reversible than reactions that do not. No god is required. Just the heat from sunlight, liquid water, and a reducing atmosphere. This doesn't mean that a god doesn't exist. It just means that a god would be irrelevant as a requirement for the origins if life. Being created is possible, just completely unnecessary. On the other hand, a god creating these complex relationships suddenly out of nothing would require magic. Evidence exists to support every bit of this hypothesis. There are even portions of it that are experimentally reproducible. When was the last time you saw a clay doll animated to life? Do you suppose that primitive stories about clay dolls being brought to life by magic, might just be stories invented by the story tellers of primitive cultures in an attempt to explain the origins of life told by stone age people who had no idea about chemistry and thermodynamics and the mischief that carbon and nitrogen get up to without any help from a god? my response your claim that universe created it self instead of GOD creating it is false because that is thought . and nobody has ever seen a thought before so there is no way universe was not created itself because that is thought and they do not exist . secondl proto lifes does not exist no evidence for it . but also as previous said life is biological machine with genetics it either increases in information as life gets more advanced it need more infomation because if not it remains bacteria . more complexity means more information so its either increasing information or stagnant/declining . research done on bacteria and fruit files showed in lensky expermitnes showed they remained fruit files and bacteria . and i explained what mutagens do they do not cause mutation but merely intensify them ore aclelerate them . when they tempered with crucials devenlopmental gene the organism merely becomes badly deformed or dies . as article said The experiments proved that the mutation of any of these core developmental genes―mutations that would be essential for the fruit fly to evolve into any other creature―merely resulted in dead or deformed fruit flies. This therefore showed that fruit flies could not evolve. Evolution was not observed in fruit fly genetic manipulations in 1980, nor has it been observed in decades-long multigenerational studies of bacteria and fruit flies. The experiments only showed that these creatures have practical limits to the amount of genetic change they can tolerate. When those limits are breached, the creatures don't evolve-they just die. so specific genes if tempered with necessary to change one form of life to another form the results they merely died or become deformed . so are mutation increasing the genetic information or causing the loss of it( or stagnant ) ? . we have data not merely on bacteria and fruit files but also HUMAN DATA . the effects of mutagen such radiation and chemical at chernbole the offspring of pple exposed to radiation become badly deformed or died same with at fallujah exposed to radiation from the munitions of americans they become deformed or died the offspring . same with Vietnam the agent orange produced the same results as chernoble and iraq . the mutation caused them to become badly deformed or deid and pple exposed to radiation and agent orange also got cancer ( mutation cause cancer( mutant cells ) so all experimental data demonstrated that mutation cause the lose of genetic information meaning . million of years ago non life to life and enough generation go by and bacteria die off it seems to me that GOD created all life perfect and if tamperer with certain segments of gene code that would have to tempred with to change one life form to another . the organism merely become deformed or died . so GOD instantaneously created varies forms of life perfect all the genetic information that ever exist existed in originals and every subsequence generation accurs more and more mutation . through natural selection , mutation ( breaking code or deleting it ) epigenetics ( turning genes on and off ) . you get specification . but as does it loses information and all variation that exists in dog kind came from genetic code of originals . that makes sense and eventual end of all life is extinction as the genetic code decays . so it is not bacteria came to being then mutation and natural selection changed from single to monkey to human .but rather created the diffrent varites of life perfect and specification occurred as genetic information was lost and that if mutation temper core developmental genes the organism dies off and this also demonstratd in bacteria and fruit files as well in human . meaning life is fixed to its kind a dog dog a cat a cat .

[@germanvisitor2]

I will say it again: how dare you call Dinosaur Cardboard Cutout Trailer Park a sandbox?

[@empressoftheknownuniverse]

That is a BRILLIANT description...I call fair use and plan to use it fairly often. Thank you!🤗

[@germanvisitor2]

@@empressoftheknownuniverse Please do. I would love if this becomes a thing.

[@robertbaty6336]

Well, as it develops, it does appear Kent is working on an RV park known as Paz Marah RV Park. It has a FaceBook page at: facebook.com/pazmarah.rvpark.5 The Conecuh County GIS on-line property record currently shows it is owned by Mia Vos, one of Kent's former supporters who decided she was not going to be using the property as her second home or otherwise promoting Kent. Kent allegedly bought it, but has not transferred ownership; so it seems. It is right around the corner from the 145 acre conpound; on Route 7 (3988 County Road 7). .

[@empressoftheknownuniverse]

@@robertbaty6336 So, he's expanding his conpound, and compounding his folly. Fascinating. How long until he's so addle-pated in his delusion of power that we'll see another Waco incident? Dark, but a possibility. You did a very good job articulating the facts of the cases. Thank you for your hard work taking on such an obvious charlatan who bilks the simple and needy out of their money. 🤑

[@robertbaty6336]

@@empressoftheknownuniverse There is more to that angel on the story, and I recently posted about that at: facebook.com/groups/kenthovindsworstnightmare/permalink/1675270069308782/ .

[@mikepeters2130]

I love how you gave Kent the last word...classy and simultaneously hilarious! This is another fantastic video and relevant to your goal of educating the masses about the dangers of believing in young earth creationism. I've long wondered if Hovind is as innocent as he claims. Though I'm an atheist, I've had little appreciation for ad hominem quips from other atheist KZbinrs about his incarceration. I didn't see how questionable tax laws were pertinent to the creation vs. evolution debate. This video demonstrates Hovind's deception and flagrant disregard for the law; he bends the rules until they fit his idea of Eutopia. It shows how Kent's confirmation bias rules multiple (all?) aspects of his life. There's no evidence (that I see) he's searching for truths in anything. I believe anyone wanting to listen to Hovind should understand Kent's deep need to defend himself and his beliefs above anything and everything else. This video points this out so beautifully. Thank you, Paulogia, for another great vid!

[@Paulogia]

Thank you, Mike

[@Ugly_German_Truths]

Breaking tax laws and setting himself up in court as "sovereign citizen" (although i think Kent goes by Freeman on the Land, which used to be more a british thing) show that he lacks honesty and integrity in his actions with the government. It is in so far relevant for the Evolution debate as a dishonest Kent is not a good source on reliable information. The rest is simply schadenfreude about a bloviating diehard liar getting his comeuppance for sheer ignorance of his civic duties and trying to weasel out of them like with his whole project being classified as "a ministry" when there is little religious about simply getting evolution wrong and he has yet to either disprove evolution or prove creation.

[@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392]

anyway evolution is pseudoscience from 19th century used by dogmatic atheist is justify their worldview a assault against but also a political ideology . for communist and nas1 Social Darwinism social theory WRITTEN BY The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree.... See Article History Social Darwinism, the theory that human groups and races are subject to the same laws of natural selection as Charles Darwin perceived in plants and animals in nature. According to the theory, which was popular in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the weak were diminished and their cultures delimited while the strong grew in power and cultural influence over the weak. Social Darwinists held that the life of humans in society was a struggle for existence ruled by “survival of the fittest,” a phrase proposed by the British philosopher and scientist Herbert Spencer. …form of evolutionary ethics is social Darwinism, though this view owes far more to Herbert Spencer than it does to Darwin himself. It begins... The social Darwinists-notably Spencer and Walter Bagehot in England and William Graham Sumner in the United States-believed that the process of natural selection acting on variations in the population would result in the survival of the best competitors and in continuing improvement in the population. Societies were viewed as organisms that evolve in this manner. The theory was used to support laissez-faire capitalism and political conservatism. Class stratification was justified on the basis of “natural” inequalities among individuals, for the control of property was said to be a correlate of superior and inherent moral attributes such as industriousness, temperance, and frugality. Attempts to reform society through state intervention or other means would, therefore, interfere with natural processes; unrestricted competition and defense of the status quo were in accord with biological selection. The poor were the “unfit” and should not be aided; in the struggle for existence, wealth was a sign of success. At the societal level, social Darwinism was used as a philosophical rationalization for imperialist, colonialist, and racist policies, sustaining belief in Anglo-Saxon or Aryan cultural and biological superiority. Social Darwinism declined during the 20th century as an expanded knowledge of biological, social, and cultural phenomena undermined, rather than supported, its basic tenets. ALPHABET pple are garbage . secondly pualogia is a fatass why is trying to claim other wise . also paulgia is little bitch who spends his entire life railing against something he claims does not exist wasting his time . if he really did not believe in GOD why is wasting his time and every thing is going to heat death of universe all he does in is vain why waste what time he has left . unless he is bitter against GOD you pple are not atheist/agnostics other wise you would not care your satanists . like the communist movement . “My object in life is to dethrone God and destroy capitalism.” ~ Karl Marx for example the ple he hanged out with worshiped the devil . page 26 archive.org/details/MarxAndSatan/page/n24/mode/1up?q=russian Marx did not often speak publicly about metaphysics, but we can gather his views from the men with whom he associated. One of his partners in the First International was Mikhail Bakunin, a Russian anarchist, who wrote: The Evil One is the satanic revolt against divine authority, revolt in which we see the fecund germ of all human emancipations, the revolution. Socialists recognise each other by the words "In the name of the one to whom a great wrong has been done." Satan [is] the eternal rebel, the first freethinker and the emancipator of worlds. He makes man ashamed of his bestial ignorance and obedience; he emancipates him, stamps upon his brow the seal of liberty and humanity, in urging him to disobey and eat of the fruit of knowledge. Bakunin does more than praise Lucifer. He has a concrete program of revolution, butnot one that would free the poor from exploitation. He writes: In this revolution we will have to awaken the Devil in the people, to stir up the basest passions. Our mission is to destroy, not to edify. The passion of destruction is a creative passion. Marx, along with Bakunin, formed the First International and endorsed this strange program. Marx and Engels said in The Communist Manifesto that the proletarian sees law, morality, and religion as "so many bourgeois prejudices, behind which lurk in ambush just as many bourgeois interests."

[@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392]

you pple deny the law of biognesis and also deny basic biology that life is biological machine as like car . compose of various parts that are interdependent and if single part is missing the system fails . or if merely a single part the miissing the rest of system it does not work . f0r example human heart liver lung kidney blood brain . etc if one part is missing whole system fails and if merely a heart it does not work either it merely failurs . you need instantaneous generation of human for reason given one part missing the system fails and if merely one part the system just like car it has fuel pump as like human heart and this true it single cell level DNA stores the information , ribosome decodes the DNA ATP powers process , if one part of system is missing such dna you cannot replicate the machinery because information to recreate it store on dna so through its life cycle . without leaving replicates of itself . so it does not exist nor does a copy so bacteria levease existence . but also ribomseome you could not get information out of single cell without it and so sellf cannot replicate and dies of off without leaving replices of itself . ATP powers that process of riboseome decoding the dna with out ithe process does not work . so if one parts missing the system fails and if merely one part it merely degrades such as DNA it cannot do anything on its own . for example a virus is bacteriaphage and DNA and bind to single cell and injects itself the DNA and hijacks the machinery and replicates it self until ruptures the cell . proving DNA on its own can do nothing . so requires instaous creation or it will fail and merely degenerate along with data on mutations causing cancer , expermintes done fruit files and bacteria showed the mutation are merely degenerative to genetic code . and data on human demonstrate mutation are degenerative . such chernoble and fallujah and Vietnam . the mutation merely caused deformities or they died as like in fruit fly and bacteria experiments . life requires instouse creation . because is it system of parts and one part on its own can do nothing and system missing one part can do nothing either . but mutation degenerative meaning that single cell come into existence enough generation and organism the genetic code degenerates over long enough period and goes out existence . so evolution is false the law of biogenesis life comes from life so non life does no turn to life . and something cannot come from nothing so idea of universe created itself is false .

[@raymondsanders3584]

These individuals who don’t feel they are citizens and have to obey our laws, should be arrested and deported just like any foreign person who doesn’t come into the country the proper way. Unless they have the paper work to prove they should live here.

[@jamierichardson7683]

Who could you possibly hate enough to torture by moving those assholes into their country?

[@victordelarosa4599]

Oh...He wasn't prepared for that!

[@samuelc.7212]

I havent seen a felon deconstructed so thoroughly since ive watched 60 minutes murder documentary

[@geeman3693]

“Unjustly incarcerated”as all criminals say. Lol. As a retired police officer, I have to say I have never talked to anyone in jail who has told me they were justly incarcerated.

[@codymiller5731]

Kent: the courts do not have jurisdiction over me Also Kent: I'm going sue the court by filing a complaint with the court!

[@daviestj]

It needs to be dismissed _with prejudice_ and this would stop these frivolous lawsuits unless he wants to immediately be in contempt of court.

[@CJFCarlsson]

He probably will get nowhere but it is a nice reminder that going from disagreement to libel and persecution can end you up in unwanted places.

[@travelinghermit]

I just fell in love with this KZbinr for saying "I use software to normalize my audio." I feel like that should be a KZbin requirement lol

[@Tronnyverse]

Is Kent jealous that Paul has a better relationship with his own son Eric? My word, Kent sounds so salty that you would think he dare to disobey god and looked back on the forbidden city. lol

[@empressoftheknownuniverse]

ZING! Very clever and well done. 😜

[@Paulogia]

ha!

[@Tronnyverse]

@@empressoftheknownuniverse Thanks :)

[@danielf.7151]

Your comment made me think: regardles of his opinions on evolution vs creation, Eric seems like a rather chill guy to hang out with. Kent on the other hand...

[@zacharyjohnson1987]

“The Canadian Atheist” sounds like a baller ass wrestling nickname. Paul “The Canadian Atheist”-ogia!

[@Ugly_German_Truths]

and it sounds as if there was only one canadian at any time that could fill this role... so what about Brainy Beaver? Viced Rhino? Shannon Q? Many a canadian is atheist or at least non-theist... are they nothing to Kent? Only his own personal nemesis counts? Poor Kent.

[@Payne2view]

That's "alleged Canadian" atheist don't forget.

[@zacharyjohnson1987]

Robert Payne I like how Paul’s Canadian-ness is in question when I have heard him say “sorry” for interrupting multiple times while co-hosting on The Line. The politeness mind you not the other thing about Canadians saying “sorry”

[@zombieguy4444]

With his signature move: The Rebuttal

[@artmoss6889]

I would consider giving Kent a significant amount of money, IF in exchange for the cash, he and Eric had to wear shock collars that would deliver a charge (e.g., 3000 volts/120 miliamps) whenever they said anything that was even a tiny bit dishonest. Kent and Eric would be monitored 24 hours a day by volunteers from across the country, and these loyal Americans would have absolute authority to decide if either of them deserved a shock. I imagine it would not be uncommon for them to get tapped in their sleep or when silent, because God knows, they might be on the verge of saying something dishonest.

[@drlegendre]

Paul, this is certainly one of your best and most interesting videos - you may have missed your calling as an investigative reporter. Btw, look who's about to break 60K subs? Good on you, sir! Here's love from Minnesota!

[@juniusluriuscatalus6606]

Wow, if even piece of this is true - and I believe it is - I'm amazed how he can have supporters at all. Btw, thanks for clearing all the technical aspects, I would have been a bit confused! Good job!

[@Paulogia]

Our pleasure, Jani

[@Jeartozer]

Gotta love Kent's attempted intimidation tactic of telling atheists to quote "keep your head down, and you won't get whacked". Really showing that love of Christ eh?

[@zombieguy4444]

This is why Sir Sic wears a helmet

[@leepeel7129]

Never heard this "ex-evolutionist" claim before, so, yet another lie.

[@Ugly_German_Truths]

And Kent has not once shown that he actually ever looked into the theory of evoltuion based on not creationist misrepresentations of it... he actually is one of the worst sinners totally getting it wrong whenever he "explains" how it works. The old "and then that blind mammal decided to grow/evolve an eyeball" nonsense no scientist does promote cause it's so clearly nonsensical and against everything we know AND observe. He also does not even get the basic difference between individuals and populations in terms of how evolution affects them...

[@Payne2view]

He is an ex-[thought he knew about evolution but obviously didnt]ist.

[@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392]

my opionion you do not what pride is . pride risen against authority of GOD . that is pride a heart risen up as like cain heart was risen up . usurping GOD authority from GOD over the self . evolution is pseudoscience from 19th century used by dogmatic atheist is justify their worldview a assualt against butalso a poltical idealogy . for communist and nas1 Social Darwinism social theory WRITTEN BY The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree.... See Article History Social Darwinism, the theory that human groups and races are subject to the same laws of natural selection as Charles Darwin perceived in plants and animals in nature. According to the theory, which was popular in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the weak were diminished and their cultures delimited while the strong grew in power and cultural influence over the weak. Social Darwinists held that the life of humans in society was a struggle for existence ruled by “survival of the fittest,” a phrase proposed by the British philosopher and scientist Herbert Spencer. …form of evolutionary ethics is social Darwinism, though this view owes far more to Herbert Spencer than it does to Darwin himself. It begins... The social Darwinists-notably Spencer and Walter Bagehot in England and William Graham Sumner in the United States-believed that the process of natural selection acting on variations in the population would result in the survival of the best competitors and in continuing improvement in the population. Societies were viewed as organisms that evolve in this manner. The theory was used to support laissez-faire capitalism and political conservatism. Class stratification was justified on the basis of “natural” inequalities among individuals, for the control of property was said to be a correlate of superior and inherent moral attributes such as industriousness, temperance, and frugality. Attempts to reform society through state intervention or other means would, therefore, interfere with natural processes; unrestricted competition and defense of the status quo were in accord with biological selection. The poor were the “unfit” and should not be aided; in the struggle for existence, wealth was a sign of success. At the societal level, social Darwinism was used as a philosophical rationalization for imperialist, colonialist, and racist policies, sustaining belief in Anglo-Saxon or Aryan cultural and biological superiority. Social Darwinism declined during the 20th century as an expanded knowledge of biological, social, and cultural phenomena undermined, rather than supported, its basic tenets. ALPHABET pple are garbage . secondly pualogia is a fatass why is trying to claim other wise . also paulgia is little bitch who spends his entire life railing against something he claims does not exist wasting his time . if he really did not believe in GOD why is wasting his time and every thing is going to heat death of universe all he does in is vain why waste what time he has left . unless he is bitter against GOD you pple are not atheist/agnostics other wise you would not care your satanists . like the communist movement . “My object in life is to dethrone God and destroy capitalism.” ~ Karl Marx for example the ple he hanged out with worshiped the devil . page 26 archive.org/details/MarxAndSatan/page/n24/mode/1up?q=russian Marx did not often speak publicly about metaphysics, but we can gather his views from the men with whom he associated. One of his partners in the First International was Mikhail Bakunin, a Russian anarchist, who wrote: The Evil One is the satanic revolt against divine authority, revolt in which we see the fecund germ of all human emancipations, the revolution. Socialists recognise each other by the words "In the name of the one to whom a great wrong has been done." Satan [is] the eternal rebel, the first freethinker and the emancipator of worlds. He makes man ashamed of his bestial ignorance and obedience; he emancipates him, stamps upon his brow the seal of liberty and humanity, in urging him to disobey and eat of the fruit of knowledge. Bakunin does more than praise Lucifer. He has a concrete program of revolution, butnot one that would free the poor from exploitation. He writes: In this revolution we will have to awaken the Devil in the people, to stir up the basest passions. Our mission is to destroy, not to edify. The passion of destruction is a creative passion. Marx, along with Bakunin, formed the First International and endorsed this strange program. Marx and Engels said in The Communist Manifesto that the proletarian sees law, morality, and religion as "so many bourgeois prejudices, behind which lurk in ambush just as many bourgeois interests." archive.org/details/MarxAndSatan/page/n11/mode/2up made in a poem called "The Player," later downplayed by both himself and his followers: The hellish vapors rise and fill the brain, Till I go mad and my heart is utterly changed. See this sword? The prince of darkness Sold it to me. For me he beats the time and gives the signs. Ever more boldly I play the dance of death.'? this is why said he satanist . him and his ilk

[@leepeel7129]

@@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392 Your spelling errors are numerous. Why did you try to put a whole essay into a youtube comment? If you read a bit more widely, you might be able to offer something worth engaging with. Your massive, scatter-gun attacks (including the comment on Paulogias weight, you classy asshole) reveal that you have not thought critically about your beliefs or the beliefs you are trying to denigrate. The bible is just wrong.

[@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392]

@@leepeel7129 acutaly i do i know natural theology the uncaused first cause the cosmological argument , teleological argument , and moral argument . and i also know something cannot come from nothing non life odes not turn to life and evolution is historical narrative supported by forensics to try prove this historical narrative . but actual observational and experimentation contradict it life is biological machine and that mutation are degenerative .( genetic entohpy backed human data as well as data on fruit files and bacterai) . the only reason tihs pass by is because of philosphical shift towards science from christian axiom of GOD created universe it was knowable and understandable the desingand order is product of intelligence and it was rational and knowable as we rational and can learn about through how his creation works . Johannes Kepler From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Kepler lived in an era when there was no clear distinction between astronomy and astrology, but there was a strong division between astronomy (a branch of mathematics within the liberal arts) and physics (a branch of natural philosophy). Kepler also incorporated religious arguments and reasoning into his work, motivated by the religious conviction and belief that God had created the world according to an intelligible plan that is accessible through the natural light of reason.[6] Kepler described his new astronomy as "celestial physics",[7] as "an excursion into Aristotle's Metaphysics",[8] and as "a supplement to Aristotle's On the Heavens",[9] transforming the ancient tradition of physical cosmology by treating astronomy as part of a universal mathematical physics.[10] Contents then philosophical shift called modern histocism ( Building Biblical Theology - Lesson 1: What is Biblical Theology? 16: 00 20:00 kzbin.info/www/bejne/nHKbamx9nstrb7M ) occurred and shift it from how the universe works to how it got that way and universe created itself. then atheism materlist secularist brought up a evolution a very old idea . then darwin showed up then jean bapitst lemark and earnest haekel and fraud the embyoritic followed it evolution history then 7 years later is pictures proven to be fruadulent . the karl marx inspired by darwin wrote his communist manifesto and captilist become facists . and pseudoscience of nzi called sientifc rac1sm .( On the Origin of Species (or, more completely, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life ) this might be usefull here . Social Darwinism social theory WRITTEN BY The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree.... See Article History Social Darwinism, the theory that human groups and races are subject to the same laws of natural selection as Charles Darwin perceived in plants and animals in nature. According to the theory, which was popular in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the weak were diminished and their cultures delimited while the strong grew in power and cultural influence over the weak. Social Darwinists held that the life of humans in society was a struggle for existence ruled by “survival of the fittest,” a phrase proposed by the British philosopher and scientist Herbert biology, philosophy of: Evolutionary ethics …form of evolutionary ethics is social Darwinism, though this view owes far more to Herbert Spencer than it does to Darwin himself. It begins... The social Darwinists-notably Spencer and Walter Bagehot in England and William Graham Sumner in the United States-believed that the process of natural selection acting on variations in the population would result in the survival of the best competitors and in continuing improvement in the population. Societies were viewed as organisms that evolve in this manner. The theory was used to support laissez-faire capitalism and political conservatism. Class stratification was justified on the basis of “natural” inequalities among individuals, for the control of property was said to be a correlate of superior and inherent moral attributes such as industriousness, temperance, and frugality. Attempts to reform society through state intervention or other means would, therefore, interfere with natural processes; unrestricted competition and defense of the status quo were in accord with biological selection. The poor were the “unfit” and should not be aided; in the struggle for existence, wealth was a sign of success. At the societal level, social Darwinism was used as a philosophical rationalization for imperialist, colonialist, and racist policies, sustaining belief in Anglo-Saxon or Aryan cultural and biological superiority. Social Darwinism declined during the 20th century as an expanded knowledge of biological, social, and cultural phenomena undermined, rather than supported, its basic tenets. and their burning books . and in soviet union lysenkoism a lamarkian evolutionist and slew scientist who disagreed with him and banned researched into genetics and single cell . and ever this swayed science everywhere soviet union had influence . the pseudoscience of Lysenko contributed to famine the slew million in 1930 USSR and 1958 to 1961 china . the same policy same result and in early days 1950s the hundred flowers campaign then mao said open your mouth free speech then intellectual who did so where sent to country side . then 1967 1977 the cultural revolution the burning of books and persecution of intellectuals . so yeah the atheist who champion science used as ideological justification and atck against chrisitanity used to capitalism then other such polices who later this theory inspired both nasi and communist who both created their pseudoscience and persecuted intellectuaals and burned books . so ideologies waged war against chrisitantiy and they later become nasi communist and burned books attcks intellectuals . so the propanant of this pseudoscience was dogmatic atheist who cloaked themselves in inteleecutal facade and when it is stripped of as false they will not change their position . who later become communist and nasi . we know that something cannot come from nothing non life does not turn to life and monkey does not turn into a man .. so atheism is wrong the universe did not create itself but rather something created it GOD . so GOD caused universe to come into being and designed it and caused instantaneous creation of life .

[@badger1296]

I love Robert Baty. That man rocks! Good job for calling him up and having him on, Paul.

[@battleboozex]

Great video. Kent Hovind is a real piece of work, it was fascinating to hear about his legal problems.

[@ToyotaChariots]

I didn’t know Kent and Eric were against each other this is wild

[@Ugly_German_Truths]

Eric took anything of monetary value from his dad while he had stewardship over Kent's old "ministry" during his prison stint. How life can get you back when you proudly brag about having beat your 8 or 10 year old son to a pulp over being afraid of the dentist... 20 years later and you hand him the keys to the empire only to find out there no longer is an empire after you come back out of "government housing"...

[@karlgoldsmith8047]

Never forget it's because of Kent that mother of Eric/wife of Kent got to spend a year in prison.

[@Futt.Buckerson]

@@Ugly_German_Truths He also seemed to borrow a lot of material from Kent's presentations, sometimes verbatim. Which makes me wonder... Even if you believe those specific things, I feel like you would want to refresh the delivery. So I guess he's sort of riding his dad's coattails a bit to gain favor from that crowd, is uncreative enough to do a rewrite, or it's just an "if it ain't broke..." kind of thing.

[@Fanny-Fanny]

Superb guest today! Great episode, great guy. More please! ❤❤❤

[@Paulogia]

thanks, FF!

[@Fanny-Fanny]

@@Paulogia wow! You replied to me 😬😬😬. I'm totally star struck and you have made my whole week! Thank you thank you thank you! You've genuinely touched the hearts and minds of many, many people (in a good way - not literally; that would be dangerous, I think!). I'm blabbering now, so I will just wish you a continuing of your current success, and the respect and acknowledgement of one of your many enthusiastic watchers. Cheers!

[@Raiders1917]

(Kent) Hovind is literally the embodiment of petty

[@MasamiPhoenix]

I also found out that Viced Rhino isn't a rhino, Sir Sic isn't a knight, and Prophet of Zod doesn't actually have a head made out of static!

[@Paulogia]

It's been a difficult week for you.

[@seanrichardson7295]

Paul: Small correction, Ridley Scott didn't "create"/write 'Alien'. Technically, Dan O'Bannon originated it, but Walter Hill generally gets a lot of credit for taking the idea that inspired "Dark Star" and making it into the script that Ridley Scott signed on to direct.

[@LordSpongy]

I just want to bring this guest some soothing throat tea with honey.

[@Paulogia]

😊

[@ИльяИшикаев]

Would you like to bring polonium with it?

[@tetsujin_144]

0:34 - Paul Loggia? Are you related to Robert Loggia?

[@scienceexplains302]

Why didn’t Kent have Eric stoned to death? Deuteronomy 21:18-21 ESV “If a man has a stubborn and rebellious son who will not obey the voice of his father or the voice of his mother, and, though they discipline him, will not listen to them, then his father and his mother shall take hold of him and bring him out to the elders of his city at the gate of the place where he lives, and they shall say to the elders of his city, ‘This our son is stubborn and rebellious; he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton and a drunkard.’ Then all the men of the city shall stone him to death with stones. So you shall purge the evil from your midst, and all Israel shall hear, and fear. Colossians 3:20 ESV Children, obey your parents in everything, for this pleases the Lord.

[@you2uber220]

Wow he found a lawyer claiming his innocence. That should be the end of it. No?

[@robertbaty6336]

-- I don't think you will find any real lawyer proclaiming Kent's innocence. The real lawyer on Kent's board of director's (J.R. Hughes - The Bible Believing Lawyer) won't touch it. Brady Byrum is no lawyer. Brady Byrum is no paralegal. Paul John Hansen is no lawyer. .

[@arashink]

Question: if these sovereign citizens say they're not US citizens, can we arrest them for trespassing if they show up on public US property, like, say, a road?

[@richardhanck972]

Unfortunately not, otherwise we'd have way too many _legal_ non-citizens in trouble... however, finding a legit reason to have a SovCit stopped by local LE (traffic violation, etc) is hilariously likely to not end well... ...for them.

[@jmaniak1]

So Ralph wasted 5 years of his life making movie that lies about history and science?

[@Paulogia]

he did. and he's trying to make another one.

[@beth-rg8bm]

Just when I thought he couldn't look any more the bigger fool!

[@kweassa6204]

meh. He must be running low on money, so he needs to generate views. Nobody invites him to debates any more.

[@robertcampbell6349]

Kent doesn't debate. He bullies people.

[@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392]

that because he will win . anyway you pple deny the law of biognesis and also deny basic biology that life is biological machine as like car . compose of various parts that are interdependent and if single part is missing the system fails . or if merely a single part the miissing the rest of system it does not work . f0r example human heart liver lung kidney blood brain . etc if one part is missing whole system fails and if merely a heart it does not work either it merely failurs . you need instantaneous generation of human for reason given one part missing the system fails and if merely one part the system just like car it has fuel pump as like human heart and this true it single cell level DNA stores the information , ribosome decodes the DNA ATP powers process , if one part of system is missing such dna you cannot replicate the machinery because information to recreate it store on dna so through its life cycle . without leaving replicates of itself . so it does not exist nor does a copy so bacteria levease existence . but also ribomseome you could not get information out of single cell without it and so sellf cannot replicate and dies of off without leaving replices of itself . ATP powers that process of riboseome decoding the dna with out ithe process does not work . so if one parts missing the system fails and if merely one part it merely degrades such as DNA it cannot do anything on its own . for example a virus is bacteriaphage and DNA and bind to single cell and injects itself the DNA and hijacks the machinery and replicates it self until ruptures the cell . proving DNA on its own can do nothing . so requires instaous creation or it will fail and merely degenerate along with data on mutations causing cancer , expermintes done fruit files and bacteria showed the mutation are merely degenerative to genetic code . and data on human demonstrate mutation are degenerative . such chernoble and fallujah and Vietnam . the mutation merely caused deformities or they died as like in fruit fly and bacteria experiments . life requires instouse creation . because is it system of parts and one part on its own can do nothing and system missing one part can do nothing either . but mutation degenerative meaning that single cell come into existence enough generation and organism the genetic code degenerates over long enough period and goes out existence . so evolution is false the law of biogenesis life comes from life so non life does no turn to life . and something cannot come from nothing so idea of universe created itself is false . anyway evolution is pseudoscience from 19th century used by dogmatic atheist is justify their worldview a assault against but also a political ideology .

[@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392]

anyway evolution is pseudoscience from 19th century used by dogmatic atheist is justify their worldview a assault against but also a political ideology . for communist and nas1 Social Darwinism social theory WRITTEN BY The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree.... See Article History Social Darwinism, the theory that human groups and races are subject to the same laws of natural selection as Charles Darwin perceived in plants and animals in nature. According to the theory, which was popular in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the weak were diminished and their cultures delimited while the strong grew in power and cultural influence over the weak. Social Darwinists held that the life of humans in society was a struggle for existence ruled by “survival of the fittest,” a phrase proposed by the British philosopher and scientist Herbert Spencer. …form of evolutionary ethics is social Darwinism, though this view owes far more to Herbert Spencer than it does to Darwin himself. It begins... The social Darwinists-notably Spencer and Walter Bagehot in England and William Graham Sumner in the United States-believed that the process of natural selection acting on variations in the population would result in the survival of the best competitors and in continuing improvement in the population. Societies were viewed as organisms that evolve in this manner. The theory was used to support laissez-faire capitalism and political conservatism. Class stratification was justified on the basis of “natural” inequalities among individuals, for the control of property was said to be a correlate of superior and inherent moral attributes such as industriousness, temperance, and frugality. Attempts to reform society through state intervention or other means would, therefore, interfere with natural processes; unrestricted competition and defense of the status quo were in accord with biological selection. The poor were the “unfit” and should not be aided; in the struggle for existence, wealth was a sign of success. At the societal level, social Darwinism was used as a philosophical rationalization for imperialist, colonialist, and racist policies, sustaining belief in Anglo-Saxon or Aryan cultural and biological superiority. Social Darwinism declined during the 20th century as an expanded knowledge of biological, social, and cultural phenomena undermined, rather than supported, its basic tenets. ALPHABET pple are garbage . secondly pualogia is a fatass why is trying to claim other wise . also paulgia is little bitch who spends his entire life railing against something he claims does not exist wasting his time . if he really did not believe in GOD why is wasting his time and every thing is going to heat death of universe all he does in is vain why waste what time he has left . unless he is bitter against GOD you pple are not atheist/agnostics other wise you would not care your satanists . like the communist movement . “My object in life is to dethrone God and destroy capitalism.” ~ Karl Marx for example the ple he hanged out with worshiped the devil . page 26 archive.org/details/MarxAndSatan/page/n24/mode/1up?q=russian Marx did not often speak publicly about metaphysics, but we can gather his views from the men with whom he associated. One of his partners in the First International was Mikhail Bakunin, a Russian anarchist, who wrote: The Evil One is the satanic revolt against divine authority, revolt in which we see the fecund germ of all human emancipations, the revolution. Socialists recognise each other by the words "In the name of the one to whom a great wrong has been done." Satan [is] the eternal rebel, the first freethinker and the emancipator of worlds. He makes man ashamed of his bestial ignorance and obedience; he emancipates him, stamps upon his brow the seal of liberty and humanity, in urging him to disobey and eat of the fruit of knowledge. Bakunin does more than praise Lucifer. He has a concrete program of revolution, butnot one that would free the poor from exploitation. He writes: In this revolution we will have to awaken the Devil in the people, to stir up the basest passions. Our mission is to destroy, not to edify. The passion of destruction is a creative passion. Marx, along with Bakunin, formed the First International and endorsed this strange program. Marx and Engels said in The Communist Manifesto that the proletarian sees law, morality, and religion as "so many bourgeois prejudices, behind which lurk in ambush just as many bourgeois interests."

[@radiofreeutah5328]

Here's the issue with the asset transfer: If Ken has the right to insist that the assets be returned, then the transfer was a fraudulent conveyance. This means the government can still seize those assets to pay his fines as though the "transfer" hadn't occurred.

[@Devilot109]

As an anarchist and thus an anti-statist, I am very, *very* confused by Sovereign Citizen types. They... don't seem to actually oppose the State, just think they have the magic power to not be affected by it by saying so.

[@chartle1]

I bet the flag had fringes. 👍🤣

[@Fanny-Fanny]

Just like my knickers

[@shiranuiraccoon7521]

Hovind goes so low ( and tries so hard ) when it comes to personal attacks that it is almost hilarious. He has the modesty of a 3rd grader, kinda simmilar to his knownledge tbh.

[@Krikenemp18]

"A SWAT team is a *kind* of police group, therefore the words are interchangeable." -Kent "3rd graders do my thinking for me" Hovind, probably

[@fatamsimth]

So fascinating to hear a calm, measured, reasonable voice in contrast with Hovind's, which is the opposite in every way.

[@roberrplatt4214]

I made a bad mistake in my filing and got hit with a gigantic tax penalty, but I phoned them and they were very attentive, and I sent in a correction, and they took everything off no problem. The IRS was competent, professional, courteous, and quick.

[@doranku]

Keep poking Kent, maybe do some colabs with Kent voice impersonators. My favorite is Dr Josh from Digital Hamurabi, you can find his impressions of Kent on Skylar Fictions channel in the older vids.

[@Paulogia]

love Dr Josh for many reasons

[@Slum0vsky]

@@Paulogia Gasp! Are you cheating on Rhino, Paul?!

[@Ugly_German_Truths]

Isn't there this frog that also does a remarkable job of sounding like Kent... or Jordan Peterson or Ben shapiro... talented voice actor that guy.... although he often looks a bit felty...

[@stuartkennedy505]

I await the results with baited breath. Prediction: Kent gets Fck all and son Eric recieves 100% of Fathers awards. I've even wrote a formula 0/500,000,00*100/2=0. although im hoping they wont get that much. :)

[@EdwardHowton]

The question isn't how much fuck-all Kent gets, it's the bonuses that will be paid out to him on top of the fuck all. Like: "will he get jail time?" and "how much jail time will he get?" and "How long before he's arrested for stalking the judge who laughed in his stupid face and trying to set fire to said judge's house at night?" Those are the REAL important questions.

[@stuartkennedy505]

@@EdwardHowton I can only hope that the answer to your questions are more than the results of my prediction. A LOT MORE :)

[@SadisticSenpai61]

I'm hoping the court fines Kent for wasting their time. Hey, a girl can dream!

[@Ugly_German_Truths]

And they even are too stupid to realize that by claiming such absurd amounts all they will achieve is making some lawyer filthy stinking rich as their rates directly depend on the value (not the merit! :D) of the case. 500 million is a good windfall for any legal company and even if he represents himself (which would guarantee an abject failure) the court's fees also depend on such things, so he just will pay obscene amounts for his day in court that he wouldn't have needed to pay if he had even SOME insight into how the world works. Probably will end up in civil bankruptcy as his shitty sandpit isn't worth nearly enough to cover any such costs.

[@EdwardHowton]

@@Ugly_German_Truths From what I've read, the "lawyer" representing Hovind is his anti-government cult leader, the "sovereign citizen" who mentored Kent in the ways of being a stupid fucking idiot. Meaning, Kent is representing himself. Poorly, but that goes without saying, and it's cleverly in _all_ the various meanings of 'poor'. The best question is, was Kent dumb enough to file the lawsuit in one of the states where he's liable -if- when he loses to pay the defense's legal fees. Which really should be standard practice, I think; if you file nuisance lawsuits, you should be punished for it. And considering how much Kent likes beating children, he deserves a lot of punishment himself.

[@Frynge357]

hey. HEY! Pauline-o-gia doesn't work quite as well! I'm freaking out, dude! ;)

[@EdwardHowton]

Paulettegia works though.

[@Paulogia]

ohhhh

[@zipjay]

0:30 How did he ever "get fooled by" evolution? According to Wikipedia, he became a born again christian at the age of 16 and then went on a chistian college where he studied music. So did he study evolution as a teenager??

[@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392]

evolution is pseudoscience from 19th century anyway evolution is pseudoscience from 19th century used by dogmatic atheist is justify their worldview a assault against but also a political ideology . for communist and nas1 Social Darwinism social theory WRITTEN BY The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree.... See Article History Social Darwinism, the theory that human groups and races are subject to the same laws of natural selection as Charles Darwin perceived in plants and animals in nature. According to the theory, which was popular in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the weak were diminished and their cultures delimited while the strong grew in power and cultural influence over the weak. Social Darwinists held that the life of humans in society was a struggle for existence ruled by “survival of the fittest,” a phrase proposed by the British philosopher and scientist Herbert Spencer. …form of evolutionary ethics is social Darwinism, though this view owes far more to Herbert Spencer than it does to Darwin himself. It begins... The social Darwinists-notably Spencer and Walter Bagehot in England and William Graham Sumner in the United States-believed that the process of natural selection acting on variations in the population would result in the survival of the best competitors and in continuing improvement in the population. Societies were viewed as organisms that evolve in this manner. The theory was used to support laissez-faire capitalism and political conservatism. Class stratification was justified on the basis of “natural” inequalities among individuals, for the control of property was said to be a correlate of superior and inherent moral attributes such as industriousness, temperance, and frugality. Attempts to reform society through state intervention or other means would, therefore, interfere with natural processes; unrestricted competition and defense of the status quo were in accord with biological selection. The poor were the “unfit” and should not be aided; in the struggle for existence, wealth was a sign of success. At the societal level, social Darwinism was used as a philosophical rationalization for imperialist, colonialist, and racist policies, sustaining belief in Anglo-Saxon or Aryan cultural and biological superiority. Social Darwinism declined during the 20th century as an expanded knowledge of biological, social, and cultural phenomena undermined, rather than supported, its basic tenets. ALPHABET pple are garbage . secondly pualogia is a fatass why is trying to claim other wise . also paulgia is little bitch who spends his entire life railing against something he claims does not exist wasting his time . if he really did not believe in GOD why is wasting his time and every thing is going to heat death of universe all he does in is vain why waste what time he has left . unless he is bitter against GOD you pple are not atheist/agnostics other wise you would not care your satanists . like the communist movement . “My object in life is to dethrone God and destroy capitalism.” ~ Karl Marx for example the ple he hanged out with worshiped the devil . page 26 archive.org/details/MarxAndSatan/page/n24/mode/1up?q=russian Marx did not often speak publicly about metaphysics, but we can gather his views from the men with whom he associated. One of his partners in the First International was Mikhail Bakunin, a Russian anarchist, who wrote: The Evil One is the satanic revolt against divine authority, revolt in which we see the fecund germ of all human emancipations, the revolution. Socialists recognise each other by the words "In the name of the one to whom a great wrong has been done." Satan [is] the eternal rebel, the first freethinker and the emancipator of worlds. He makes man ashamed of his bestial ignorance and obedience; he emancipates him, stamps upon his brow the seal of liberty and humanity, in urging him to disobey and eat of the fruit of knowledge. Bakunin does more than praise Lucifer. He has a concrete program of revolution, butnot one that would free the poor from exploitation. He writes: In this revolution we will have to awaken the Devil in the people, to stir up the basest passions. Our mission is to destroy, not to edify. The passion of destruction is a creative passion. Marx, along with Bakunin, formed the First International and endorsed this strange program. Marx and Engels said in The Communist Manifesto that the proletarian sees law, morality, and religion as "so many bourgeois prejudices, behind which lurk in ambush just as many bourgeois interests."

[@theoratoroftheapocalypse5392]

you pple deny the law of biognesis and also deny basic biology that life is biological machine as like car . compose of various parts that are interdependent and if single part is missing the system fails . or if merely a single part the miissing the rest of system it does not work . f0r example human heart liver lung kidney blood brain . etc if one part is missing whole system fails and if merely a heart it does not work either it merely failurs . you need instantaneous generation of human for reason given one part missing the system fails and if merely one part the system just like car it has fuel pump as like human heart and this true it single cell level DNA stores the information , ribosome decodes the DNA ATP powers process , if one part of system is missing such dna you cannot replicate the machinery because information to recreate it store on dna so through its life cycle . without leaving replicates of itself . so it does not exist nor does a copy so bacteria levease existence . but also ribomseome you could not get information out of single cell without it and so sellf cannot replicate and dies of off without leaving replices of itself . ATP powers that process of riboseome decoding the dna with out ithe process does not work . so if one parts missing the system fails and if merely one part it merely degrades such as DNA it cannot do anything on its own . for example a virus is bacteriaphage and DNA and bind to single cell and injects itself the DNA and hijacks the machinery and replicates it self until ruptures the cell . proving DNA on its own can do nothing . so requires instaous creation or it will fail and merely degenerate along with data on mutations causing cancer , expermintes done fruit files and bacteria showed the mutation are merely degenerative to genetic code . and data on human demonstrate mutation are degenerative . such chernoble and fallujah and Vietnam . the mutation merely caused deformities or they died as like in fruit fly and bacteria experiments . life requires instouse creation . because is it system of parts and one part on its own can do nothing and system missing one part can do nothing either . but mutation degenerative meaning that single cell come into existence enough generation and organism the genetic code degenerates over long enough period and goes out existence . so evolution is false the law of biogenesis life comes from life so non life does no turn to life . and something cannot come from nothing so idea of universe created itself is false . anyway evolution is pseudoscience from 19th century used by dogmatic atheist is justify their worldview a assault against but also a political ideology .

[@Amoth_oth_ras_shash]

...karma ? sounds like he reaped exactly the sort of morals and 'gratitude' his teachings and parenting inspired.

[@blitoris]

The Hovind's. An entire family of grifters.

[@sbradley7817]

Canadian atheist, disgruntled father, middle aged non-millennial cartoon, and 5G user... Paulogia.

[@Paulogia]

you got me good

[@georgekraft1401]

Kent Hovind's backers prove "There's a sucker born every moment."

[@erictaylor5462]

They really need to change the law to prevent filing these suits that have no merit.