How Art Can Save You | Nietzsche's The Birth of Tragedy

  Рет қаралды 71,019

Weltgeist

Weltgeist

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 168
@WeltgeistYT
@WeltgeistYT Жыл бұрын
This video was a LOT of work, so please leave a like and comment (and subscribe if you haven't already...) if you want to support us! And if you can afford it, join us on Patreon where we post exclusive content. Ty for watching! -WG ▶ www.patreon.com/WeltgeistYT
@satnamo
@satnamo Жыл бұрын
You are welcome, Alex!
@shadowlessgam
@shadowlessgam Жыл бұрын
Too many ads
@rhysenfyneix7864
@rhysenfyneix7864 Жыл бұрын
Ooo
@rhysenfyneix7864
@rhysenfyneix7864 Жыл бұрын
9o
@sonjia619
@sonjia619 7 ай бұрын
I would like you to know this video helped me so much in understanding my journey i have been called to. I clearly see the good and the bad in a much more brighter light. Your video has helped me tremendously. I look forward to watching more on dyoneses to get a better understanding on the whyn
@hardwoodthought1213
@hardwoodthought1213 Жыл бұрын
‘Man is not an artist; he is a work of art’
@Fr33_K3y
@Fr33_K3y Жыл бұрын
Both. We are an abundance of super position.
@michaeldamato9466
@michaeldamato9466 Жыл бұрын
Or he's a piece of work lol.
@Dino_Medici
@Dino_Medici 9 ай бұрын
THE COSTLIEST MARBLE THE NOBLEST OF CLAY
@sporeolegy
@sporeolegy 3 ай бұрын
We create because we are created ~ Tolkien
@leonnox3462
@leonnox3462 Жыл бұрын
Birth of Tragedy has been the most difficult work of Nietzsche for me to understand so I'm glad to finally see your analysis.
@stanislavstoimenov1729
@stanislavstoimenov1729 Жыл бұрын
Really? Not "Thus spoke Zarathustra"? How strange...
@charlesring9579
@charlesring9579 Жыл бұрын
@@stanislavstoimenov1729 Zarathustra? Really I consider On the Genealogy of morals most difficult. But I read that first and Zarathustra last, probably has something to do with it.
@shinybeast8946
@shinybeast8946 Жыл бұрын
@@stanislavstoimenov1729 "...Zarathustra"is a walk in the park compared to "Beyond Good and Evil."
@m1ar1vin
@m1ar1vin Жыл бұрын
Would love a DEEP dive on Dionysus!! awesome videos you guys are putting out there, please keep it up
@soniab4876
@soniab4876 Жыл бұрын
I agree, it's such a complex and ample subject that becomes a whole "motif" that echoes throughout most of his works, it's definitely worth it
@m1ar1vin
@m1ar1vin Жыл бұрын
@@soniab4876 100%, I hope they do this. Particularily because Nietzsche himself is a hyper intelligent human, and yet didn't succumb to Socratic rationality. I haven't quite understood yet how he came to that, though I belive his various illnesses might have played a part in that.
@charlesring9579
@charlesring9579 Жыл бұрын
@@m1ar1vin Its a very autistic thought process, in my pov as autistic. Or maybe its just similar to my personal (and obviously inferior) way of thinking
@SeraphimVolker
@SeraphimVolker Жыл бұрын
I'm loving the Nietzsche content you've been putting out. I think you're the most reliable channel for fleshed out, meaningful, Nietzsche inspired videos.
@lurking_shadows49
@lurking_shadows49 Жыл бұрын
Nice to see a good summary of Nietzsche's works, especially for those who don't have the time to read all of his books.
@Индоевропљанин
@Индоевропљанин Жыл бұрын
Please do make a deep dive video on Dionysus. I loved every second of this video, one of the best youtube videos I've seen. Keep up the great work, I love your channel.
@WeltgeistYT
@WeltgeistYT Жыл бұрын
Thank you
@sondre5174
@sondre5174 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your work weltgeist. Always a delight to see you post a video on youtube.
@jmiller1918
@jmiller1918 Жыл бұрын
Best sustained look at Nietzsche's first book that I have encountered. Bravo!! So many riches in this video that a second (and possibly third) watch is mandatory.
@honestexpression6393
@honestexpression6393 Жыл бұрын
I wanted to comment exactly this.
@cecilcharlesofficial
@cecilcharlesofficial Жыл бұрын
"...in the augmentation of which the subjective vanishes to complete self-forgetfulness." This is why Alan Watts hits so hard, because he's talking about the above, but in language we all enjoy hearing. When academics use jargon to describe satori, it really makes me wonder if they've ever touched the magic, or if they're just re-wording the accounts of other people who have.
@gregpappas
@gregpappas Жыл бұрын
Congratulations. This may be your finest to dates. Neitzche’s self critique could have lead him to found modern Stoicism. If life is suffering but you rejoice, you are exactly where Epictitus starts. Please continue your outstanding work. Consider stoicism and modern stoicism as a topic. Again thank you.
@jakepokemonman1227
@jakepokemonman1227 Жыл бұрын
Love your channel. Been watching for a year or so now. I'm glad minds like myself still enjoy philosophy! Ill be watching keep up the great content.
@thabangofficial
@thabangofficial Жыл бұрын
I may be too quick to liken them, but Dostoevsky sounds like Euripides? That being said, I'd like a thorough understanding of the Apollonian and the Dionysian. I seem to follow most of Kant's, through to Arthur's, and then Freidrich's thoughts up until that point. It would be nice to get directed to a source of enlightenment regarding the two ideas.
@hardwoodthought1213
@hardwoodthought1213 8 ай бұрын
Can you expand on the Euripides/Dostoevsky point? An interesting comparison I’ve not thought of
@sigvardbjorkman
@sigvardbjorkman Жыл бұрын
5:51 The bees gather sweet honey in good order that then spontaneously start to ferment as if by some magic force, and upon consuming the alcohol it starts to, in a way, “ferment” the psyche as well with this magic.
@chrisfarley839
@chrisfarley839 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your hard work and labor in putting this video together on Nietzsche's Birth of Tragedy! I have so waited for this topic to be covered! I think it his one of his most underrated. The Apllonian and Dionysus principles are fasciating and are worthy of an in depth conversation. Thank you again!
@whatsinameme5258
@whatsinameme5258 Жыл бұрын
Brilliantly done
@WeltgeistYT
@WeltgeistYT Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@noahssircharge
@noahssircharge Жыл бұрын
Please do a video on Dionysus.
@OscarCuzzani
@OscarCuzzani Жыл бұрын
Thank you for a wonderful analysis of Nitzsche's work on tragedy.
@emZee1994
@emZee1994 Жыл бұрын
There is a tonne of value in Schopenhauer's ideas, but one idea I can never accept is that the essence of reality is suffering. Nietzsche is correct in saying that this is a terrible metaphysics
@franzwilde89
@franzwilde89 Жыл бұрын
Terrific video. A deep dive into Dionysus would be great
@WeltgeistYT
@WeltgeistYT Жыл бұрын
Thank you
@canisronis2753
@canisronis2753 Жыл бұрын
Well done, as usual...had me looking for the Thank$ button!
@WeltgeistYT
@WeltgeistYT Жыл бұрын
Much appreciated. We’ll unlock that soon
@denispanteleev6110
@denispanteleev6110 Жыл бұрын
Good day sir. Love your channel. Would you make video about François de La Rochefoucauld?
@WeltgeistYT
@WeltgeistYT Жыл бұрын
Great suggestion!
@dorsahatefi8882
@dorsahatefi8882 Жыл бұрын
A video on Dionysus will be fantastic! Thank you so much for your wonderful content.
@WesleyRosenberg
@WesleyRosenberg Жыл бұрын
Do a deep dive on Dionysus!
@LordEriolTolkien
@LordEriolTolkien Жыл бұрын
''Euripedes trousers, you men' a deez trousers...'' I'll get my hat.
@gracefitzgerald2227
@gracefitzgerald2227 Жыл бұрын
Great voice. Loved the video
@davidowen4816
@davidowen4816 Жыл бұрын
Definately worth a read, especially the later edition with his observations and critiques. The prosaic and aphoristic style of his later works is absent here but is still a joy to read. If I remember correctly this edition was dedicated to Voltaire.
@thomassimmons1950
@thomassimmons1950 Жыл бұрын
Bloody Brilliant representation-theory of the case. BRAVO 👏!
@sigvardbjorkman
@sigvardbjorkman Жыл бұрын
Amazing piece of work!
@iamone_
@iamone_ Жыл бұрын
I’m glad i found this channel.
@WeltgeistYT
@WeltgeistYT Жыл бұрын
Welcome aboard
@TheExceptionalState
@TheExceptionalState 10 ай бұрын
Wonderful weaving of the different influences uniting themselves in the writing of Nietzsche. Thank you! 🙏
@WeltgeistYT
@WeltgeistYT 10 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@wun_73
@wun_73 3 күн бұрын
I think the one part that is lefted out is the importance of the idea of Sublime from Kant in Nietzsche work
@himanshusinha9635
@himanshusinha9635 Жыл бұрын
I really love the work you are doing out there, keep going please. These videos are so very helpful. I always wanted to read Nietzsche's works, only to realize when I started reading those,they were beyond my comprehension, but after seeing your videos I feel all the more excited to pursue philosopical knowledge. Thank you and lots of love❤❤❤
@gerson_19
@gerson_19 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for providing such a detailed analysis on The Birth of Tragedy. I was hoping you could elaborate further on the concept of Dionysian in Nietzsche's philosophy. I am interested in gaining a deeper understanding of this aspect of his thought and any additional insights you can provide would be greatly appreciated, @WeltgeistYT
@afareus3353
@afareus3353 Ай бұрын
I think that in this book (which is the only one I've red from Nietzsche) he describes undescribable, therefore it can be for some people hard to understand, but once you somehow had knew much of the things that are discussed there, or even rather than knew I would say experienced, yet before you went to read it, then it is just astonishing work that express something really deep, trully metaphysical! For me it was literally a pleasure to read it and to be honest this is besides Plato the first classic philosophical work I've ever read so I didn't have this 'philosophical' preparation. But how could it help anybody to rationally know all that history of philosophy if he never experienced that dionysian anguish and intoxication? If one doesn't know these things from his own experience then it must be very hard or even impossible to understand..
@TheShamelle
@TheShamelle Жыл бұрын
So fantastic. I can't thank you enough for this.
@honestexpression6393
@honestexpression6393 Жыл бұрын
Best video on philosophy and art that I have seen till date.
@jman7826
@jman7826 Жыл бұрын
It appears to me that In the time since Nietzsche’s own plastic art has become increasingly Dionysian, through movements such as abstract expressionism, while music has become increasingly Apollonian, given the emphasis on clear cut lyrics that tell the listener how they should feel throughout the work, common in the modern “single” format. This change itself could be seen as a Dionysian movement, in that the older boundaries between the media have become increasingly blurred.
@markoslavicek
@markoslavicek Жыл бұрын
What about instrumental music?
@garrycraigpowell
@garrycraigpowell Жыл бұрын
I disagree. Plastic art is totally cerebral and rational, with a few exceptions, since 1900. Initially jazz was Dionysian, with Armstrong, etc., but became increasingly cerebral and conceptual. Pop music in the sixties had a strong Dionysian element, viz. The Doors and The Stones, but with the advent of electronic pop - music literally made by computers - has also become sterile and cerebral, even as it purports to be Dionysian. The Dionysian impulse remains - we see it in raves, for example - but I see no art, or almost none, rising to the challenge. Literature is moribund, and I say that as a novelist myself. Hardly any contemporary writers are worth reading. Even fewer have even a Dionysian streak in their work.
@markoslavicek
@markoslavicek Жыл бұрын
@@garrycraigpowell Why would you describe Apollonian as sterile? It has a negative connotation somehow, and its impulse is of equal aesthetic value as that of Dionysian.
@garrycraigpowell
@garrycraigpowell Жыл бұрын
@@markoslavicek You're right, that was hurried, thoughtless writing. Obviously you need both, and there is much Apollonian art that I admire, like the music of Bach or Mozart, or the architect of Palladio or Christopher Wren. What I meant was that art becomes sterile when it's purely rational, and divorced from feeling and intuition. I think that's true of much contemporary art in all fields. However, you're right that order and reason are in themselves not harmful, of course. Only if taken to excess - like the Bauhaus, for example.
@markoslavicek
@markoslavicek Жыл бұрын
@@garrycraigpowell I guess it all depends on how we define Apollonian and Dionysian. Rational/intuitive is surely a good perspective, but I also like to add form and content, visual and audible (if we discuss 'primary senses' to which those impulses aspire), and of course, spatial and temporal. Finally, I like to draw an analogy with pre-Socratic notions of Being and Becoming. Apollonian would in that case be the form, the material, that which is, whereas the Dionysian being the flux, the change, the energy. Cosmologically speaking, space and time form a unity called 'spacetime'. There cannot be Becoming without Being because if nothing material exists (the spatial), change cannot be detected. The change is only change if it changes 'something'. Equally so, if there is no temporal element, Being cannot exist because it is nullified into a singularity of a moment. And so, the temporal and the spatial - the Apollonian and the Dionysian - coexist in reality and are divided only through our senses and interpretation. Greek theatre was a fusion of these two aspects of art because it included both the spatial/visual (masks, stage, scene, architecture) and temporal/performative (acting, singing, dancing). A feast for eyes and ears. By the same reasoning, sculpture is always an Apollonian medium and music is always a Dionysian one, but any medium can aim to express different instincts. I like your examples of 60s pop music and electronic raves of today. They are surely Dionysian in the way we consume them (ecstatic frenzy at the concerts for example). The other example mentioned in the original comment - the abstract expressionist painting - while visual and 'unchangeable', aims to capture the frenzied movement and chaos. Basically, any art medium is able to express both impulses, bound only by limitations of the medium itself. This is where theatre has an advantage - it contains more than a single medium and is able to represent both static and dynamic forms of expression. That's why we easily categorise Mozart as an Apollonian composer even though there is nothing static about music as such. Unless... we talk about music of La Monte Young, for example. Or even Mortan Feldman. Some of their pieces are extremely 'static', which would make them way more Apollonian than any Mozart's movement. They say architecture is frozen music, but no - frozen music is the music of La Monte Young. In a similar way, meticulously calculated integral serialist pieces like those of Stockhausen or Xenakis are as rational as it gets. Again, Apollonian by definition, but their sound result appears to be entropic and Dionysian. This is why I like to imagine electronic music as an Apollonian art form, for it is a direct result of human rationality and artificial (not instinctive) achievement. And yet, those dance raves are Dionysian as a final product. We could apply the same to visual arts - dynamic sculptures, multimedia installations, etc. Apollonian by medium, Dionysian in expression. In the end, I guess one should differentiate Apollonian and Dionysian when it comes to categorisation of an art genre, and Apollonian and Dionysian when it comes to a particular work of art. I don't know if this stream of thought make any sense to you, but this is how I see it: Apollonian and Dioynsian as a continuum within which we can find both clear cut categories as well as overlapping and merging impulses.
@moussaa3145
@moussaa3145 Жыл бұрын
Great video as always, its a pleasure watching this channel, thanks for your effort.
@unitedtomato5444
@unitedtomato5444 Жыл бұрын
Here I am watching the video before reading the book 😅 Thank you for the amazing video!
@zoef3689
@zoef3689 Жыл бұрын
What a coincidence, I just started diving in to „The Birth of Tragedy“ a few days ago. Thank you so much for this video, it’s definitely helped me understand better what I’ve already read and further prepared me to continue reading! :)
@hero9402
@hero9402 Жыл бұрын
So basically Socrates was the ancient "☝️🤓" to the art
@OmarJano
@OmarJano Жыл бұрын
Very inspiring! Thank you
@bontasliviu300
@bontasliviu300 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video, it made me realize why i didnt like this book when i was younger and that it is time to take it up again with fresh eyes and knowledge. Keep up the good work it helps me immensely.
@WeltgeistYT
@WeltgeistYT Жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@bath_neon_classical
@bath_neon_classical Жыл бұрын
This is a great video thank you for your explaination
@WeltgeistYT
@WeltgeistYT Жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@silverorion7271
@silverorion7271 Жыл бұрын
thank you !! these videos are helping me sooo much in my philosophy class
@WeltgeistYT
@WeltgeistYT Жыл бұрын
You’re welcome
@Harrow_
@Harrow_ Жыл бұрын
The late Nietzsche would probably not be so critical of the humanisation of the Gods and the firm focus on the real world of Euripides’ plays, seeing as his main objection with them was that they didn’t oblige to Schopenhauer’s unity of the will, in the first edition of The birth of Tragedy. After he rejected Schopenhauer’s essence of the world, and started embracing this life passionately, I see no reason for the endurance of his Euripidean criticism in these 2 subjects.
@satnamo
@satnamo Жыл бұрын
Art +music=de Dao to salvation 🎉
@septseptsept6246
@septseptsept6246 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing such a brilliant and magistral account of this great book! This is genuinely excellent.
@WeltgeistYT
@WeltgeistYT Жыл бұрын
You're very welcome!
@SocietyOfTheLiftedLorax
@SocietyOfTheLiftedLorax Жыл бұрын
Thank you. A video regarding art would be grateful!
@WeltgeistYT
@WeltgeistYT Жыл бұрын
You got it!
@Calidore1
@Calidore1 Жыл бұрын
I’m also grateful for this. Thank you.
@isabellaandreiscassal3861
@isabellaandreiscassal3861 4 ай бұрын
Hi! how are you? Love your videos, please, can you put references in the discretion in next videos? Thanks :p
@lawxs9114
@lawxs9114 Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much from Indonesia, in my country i have Subculture nietzschean in online, your video so helpfull
@jithinjose8065
@jithinjose8065 2 ай бұрын
Pls do a grand video about it.
@MABTV
@MABTV Жыл бұрын
Please do a Dionysus follow up video 😢😢
@antediluvian2380
@antediluvian2380 Жыл бұрын
muito bom
@LordMisunderstoodSnape
@LordMisunderstoodSnape Жыл бұрын
I love your channel. ❤
@WeltgeistYT
@WeltgeistYT Жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@matheusmgames
@matheusmgames Жыл бұрын
great video, it will help at my studies
@WeltgeistYT
@WeltgeistYT Жыл бұрын
Glad to hear that!
@markoslavicek
@markoslavicek Жыл бұрын
There were some great takes on this channel but I believe this is the best video so far. Pity Nietzsche neglected the Apollonian over years in favour of the Dionysian and thus fell into the same trap of disbalance he accused Socrates and Euripides for. But either way, looking forward to new uploads 🍻
@jeanbaptiste8628
@jeanbaptiste8628 Жыл бұрын
Art isn't a past time, a hobby, or carerer; it's a relic, to a weapons system, that can't yet be built by science or academics; otherwise, an obseleted design. This book, is the internal components guideline, in Nietzsche's sequence of 2-3 2-1 1, with the 2-1, as Ecce Homo. Each has a trap; here, fantasy, is removed, in favor of industry. The family replaced by the household.
@gustavpace9858
@gustavpace9858 Жыл бұрын
Superb video ❤
@karenlouise2156
@karenlouise2156 Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much. It is much appreciated!
@RishiNigamMusic
@RishiNigamMusic Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the amazing work.
@WeltgeistYT
@WeltgeistYT Жыл бұрын
Thank you too!
@conker690
@conker690 Жыл бұрын
The criticism of Euripedies may also be a hold over of from the influence of Schopenhauer. Schopenhauer prefers books that are light on plot and heavy on character, like Tristan Shandy, and thinks works focused on plot and action bog down the works.
@WeltgeistYT
@WeltgeistYT Жыл бұрын
Yes, we’ve done a video on Schopenhauer’s take on literature. Euripides being “less poetic” than the others was a common opinion in Nietzsche’s time though, based on his Greek
@johnny_veritas
@johnny_veritas Жыл бұрын
Left brain (appolonian) Right brain (dionisian
@S2Cents
@S2Cents Жыл бұрын
Deep dive on Dionysus! ..And, Apollo.
@Beautyinugliness
@Beautyinugliness Жыл бұрын
What was Schopenhauers thoughts on dreams, seeing as Nietzsche's Apollonian is essentially conceived of as ideally represented through the state of dreaming?
@emilyjones5472
@emilyjones5472 Жыл бұрын
What about symphonic poems or programmatic music, are those not representational?
@khalsakyshatry
@khalsakyshatry 10 ай бұрын
Over emphasizing the Apollonian over the Dionysian explains Reddit feeling
@stormbreak13
@stormbreak13 Жыл бұрын
The differentiation of music from the other arts as being any more "true" is based on a false premise of thinking that our ears interpret sound waves any more correctly than our eyes interpret light, or our taste buds interpret flavor..
@gerardjones7881
@gerardjones7881 Жыл бұрын
we don't interpret music, we experience it. If its the language of the inner mind, we certainly can't translate that language into English. I can say certain music is moving but I can't define where its moving me to . If its a copy of the will, the implication is the language of the mind isn't english. Its probably very alien to us.
@satnamo
@satnamo Жыл бұрын
Silence is the music of the mind at rest
@stormbreak13
@stormbreak13 Жыл бұрын
@@gerardjones7881 this all strikes me as nonsense- you could just as well say you don't interpret flavor, you just experience it.. but of course there's the secondary reaction of classifications and rules- (is it rock, opera, classical, rap, etc.)- what emotions are elicited by a specific tempo or tone is no different than different emotions elicited by specific colors- just as a fast tempo often evokes certain moods, so do certain colors-- both conscious and unconscious- sound waves are no less material or substantive than light or 'sculptures'- you might say a photograph is merely a sculpture of photons, and a song recorded on a CD is a sculpture of sound- as their coding is literally manifest physically, and then emanated physically through sound waves--
@tcrijwanachoudhury
@tcrijwanachoudhury Жыл бұрын
This reminds me of a line of thought in my degree were looking at called Sonocentrisism vs Logocentrisim. The superiority of sound vs written/spoken/ lanaguge. Theres arguments for both but I think to agree with @gerard point about music. theres a amazing study where random participants are given a series of animation of balls bouncing at various rhythms and speeds, and then a number or sounds to listen to, the study is to observe if there are similarities in the ways we interpate sound when asked to pair the sound and movement animation together, almost ALL participants made the same choice. So while there are discrepancies in the ways we experience pitch, studies like this show how unified our experiences of sound are, the emotional connotations major and minor keys and their equivalents in non western music theory being another sign of this universality of experience. Just a few thoughts. Imo your take is a little too dry and Gerards a bit too esoteric, my belief is that the truth would maybe lie somewhere in the middle.
@stormbreak13
@stormbreak13 Жыл бұрын
@@tcrijwanachoudhury even if there's a high disproportionate percentage of people who react powerfully to music over other senses (which isn't a premise I've actually accepted, but I'll play along for now to make a separate point)- that hardly proves that sound is fundamentally more 'real' or profound or important, as an immutable, universal law- it's just an analysis on a certain group of people in a certain time, reacting to certain stimuli- we know for a fact that many if not all of our senses are dwarfed by at least one other organism In nature- a bears smell for example, or a bats hearing, or an eagles eyes.. depending on the organism, and their setting, they will have a very different experience as to what "sublime" experience is- and it's arrogant and foolish to project an apparent human affinity for music, as a universal law, or anything beyond a temporary evolutionary quirk, that most certainly has both pros and cons-
@emZee1994
@emZee1994 Жыл бұрын
Please do a deep dive on both Dinonysus and Apollo
@pollyshapkina
@pollyshapkina Жыл бұрын
Deep dive on Dionysus please :]
@stewartthomas4193
@stewartthomas4193 Жыл бұрын
Shakespeare.. Measure for Measure.. " The miserable have no other medicine. But only hope. I have hope to live, but am prepared to die " Mathew 7.1- 7.5. Leonardo da Vinci said " The greatest deception men suffer is from their own opinions " Plato shared with us wisdom he learnt from Egypt, wisdom that was a death sentence in Greece, Rome ( Christianity) ..Pythagoras, Socrates and later Hypatia of Alexandria. Plato in his dialogue " The Republic " tells the allegory of " The Cave " Plato starts by telling us of prisoners being held in a sort of underground den, let us examine this den via the geometry of Bernhard Riemann and Felix Klein..Klein bottle..3rd and 4th dimensions. Plato tells us that the prisoners are bound up unable to move their heads, let us examine this bondage via the psychology of Erich Fromm.. socialisation of consciousness.. aware-unaware. Plato tells us that the prisoners mistake shadows for substance, let us examine this mistake via the philosophy of Thales and Kant.. synthetic a priori..not thing in itself. Plato tells us that one of the prisoners is released, let us examine this release via the instructions given by T.Lobsang Rampa..stilling the mind and conscious astral travel..leaving the cave/body. Plato tells us that the prisoners will reject this release, let us examine this rejection via the psychological effects of Stockholm syndrome..Plato quotes Homer " Better to be a poor man, and have a poor master, and endure anything, than to think and live after their manner " Men are not prisoners of fate, but only prisoners of their own minds. Mathew 23 13-31.
@robertroest7619
@robertroest7619 Жыл бұрын
I think Schopenhauer has gotten it right in his metaphysics, yet I agree wholeheartedly with Nietzsches sentiment of affirmation. I’m wondering though, what philosophical arguments does Nietzsche have against Schopenhauers metaphysics? And how strong are his arguments?
@sharoncurran6622
@sharoncurran6622 Жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@chriswest8389
@chriswest8389 Жыл бұрын
I wonder what mr. n would have thought of rockn roll.
@GabbyGibetit
@GabbyGibetit Жыл бұрын
Not just best video of yours, but of videos, i have ever watched on youtube! plz dig deep into dionysian!
@WeltgeistYT
@WeltgeistYT Жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@theplebeian2706
@theplebeian2706 10 ай бұрын
Bookmark: 23:47
@Dino_Medici
@Dino_Medici 9 ай бұрын
Who else listened to Lil Wayne no Ceilings on full blast after this 😭😭😭😭
@furg
@furg Жыл бұрын
This is why I love rap and graffiti. They thrive on the spirit of Dionysus 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
@violante1421
@violante1421 Жыл бұрын
ff11:32 13:06 20:18 40:38 meta 45:44 51:22
@svetlinsofiev1910
@svetlinsofiev1910 8 ай бұрын
so photography is very Apollonian
@CAVEDATA
@CAVEDATA Жыл бұрын
Subjective art vs objective art
@hardwoodthought1213
@hardwoodthought1213 8 ай бұрын
Which side are you on?
@fairwind8676
@fairwind8676 10 ай бұрын
Yea to life!
@anilin6353
@anilin6353 Жыл бұрын
Schopenhauer reads like cluster B personality disorder platonism
@sixevensage7004
@sixevensage7004 Жыл бұрын
Sounds like Nietzsche got full of himself. No longer a philosopher but a critique instead of giving an openmind / freewill to humanity. His first release was not a rigid representation and did not formalize a normalcy and gave self accountability not governed. He gave a reflection to self accountabilty along with Kant.
@jimsteele9559
@jimsteele9559 Жыл бұрын
Great analysis and presentation once again. Yes, a treatment of Dionysus would be good. Camille Paglia has a few things to say I know, but a revisit is needed. The forces of chaos seem way out of control. Could we not use more Apollo these days? I could be wrong. Would love to see what you would put together. Cheers!
@bryanutility9609
@bryanutility9609 Жыл бұрын
Maybe the Greeks only had a primitive harp & sissy little flute.
@ThompsonFranklin-p3u
@ThompsonFranklin-p3u 11 күн бұрын
Davis Larry Hernandez Charles Perez Edward
@svetlinsofiev1910
@svetlinsofiev1910 8 ай бұрын
isn't art inherently dyonisian and science apollonian?
@thomassimmons1950
@thomassimmons1950 Жыл бұрын
Please good, sir...deeper into Dionysus!
@AAA9549-w7w
@AAA9549-w7w 9 ай бұрын
Saying God is dead demonstrates to me clearly that he did not know the principal of what he was talking about. Whether this world is an illusion or not, has to be known. Time and space, as illusions, must be explained as what illusion is. He did not comprehend the "Zoroaster" concept, and he went to his German belief to think of the Uberman. Like most Germans, they think they are special, as Zionist Jews think they are special. Metaphysicoan philosopher and fine art painter
@ikiddoistudio64
@ikiddoistudio64 Жыл бұрын
please dont put moving backgrounds on text
@ralphricart3177
@ralphricart3177 Жыл бұрын
Just add to the tragedy, that according to Hobbes, we are essentially apes, presto, we have our cripplingly disfunctional society.
@6ixthhydro652
@6ixthhydro652 Жыл бұрын
Insane
@subSapiens_
@subSapiens_ Жыл бұрын
How ridiculous Schopenhauer's theory sounds today.. but even in his time, they already knew that there's nothing 'magic' about Music.. Sound, like visual art (paintings) is nothing but waves generated by material instruments, and interacting with your senses (ears/eyes) .. The feelings/emotions are the very predictable product of these very material stimuli interacting with your specific memories, personality, etc.. Music is certainly a human construct, like painting or sculpture or a movie is, and it completely belongs to the Apollonian realm, rather than Dionysian. The two gods are not even comparable, Dionysus is about hedonism, and there's nothing chaotic about that, it's just irrelevant.. There is no chaos actually, in the Universe - it looks chaotic because of our ignorance- , and when Science looked closer, everything looked very Apollonian or rather, Aristotelian - structured, and following the cause and effect principle - .
@python_7179
@python_7179 11 ай бұрын
I disagree. Music is equally Apollonian and Dionysian. Eros is the mediating force. Music is equally mathematical and emotional, intellectual as well as physical. Sexuality and passion are the driving forces of will that gives rise to the creativity of both the Apollonian and Dionysian impulses.
@Victor_Andrei
@Victor_Andrei Жыл бұрын
My fifis!
@WheatleyDarcy-b1s
@WheatleyDarcy-b1s 6 күн бұрын
Rodriguez Thomas Gonzalez Frank Thomas Laura
@Dino_Medici
@Dino_Medici 9 ай бұрын
Why did the birth of tragedy ruin his academic career? Just because the style it’s written in? Hard to contextualize idk what were the norms of academia back then
@hardwoodthought1213
@hardwoodthought1213 8 ай бұрын
It’s a few reasons. Firstly the book was largely rejecting many traditionally accepted positions found in classical studies (such as the Greeks being happy-go-lucky, naive people plundering for the sake of it. Nietzsche argued they were a deeply emotional people capable of understanding their world and place in it. Of that their art wasn’t the white marble we now think of, instead they were very artistically inclined and expressionistic). At the time German scholars relied heavily on the Hellenic interpretation of Greece and used it to inform them; many claimed the Germans were the new Greeks or descendants of them. It’s the same with most academic fields, you suggest something off-base and it’s immediately rejected. The book is also highly speculative (I studied Ancient History at degree level and I always went into with the notion that we can never really know what happened, but Nietzsches assertions at times in the work are very far-fetched). Still the most important book I’ve ever read though. It’s basically an early form of absurdism through an artistic or aesthetic (Schopenhauer) lens.
@Dino_Medici
@Dino_Medici 8 ай бұрын
@@hardwoodthought1213 Hey there. Tysm. Okay I’m getting the bigger picture. Yeah I actually started reading Paglia’s Sexual Personae a few days ago. She has helped me understand what Nietzsche was getting at-The distinction between high classical and Hellenistic Greece. How through Plato in philosophy and Euripides in art, Greek culture went from a Dionysian spirit to an Apollonian one. I’m gonna have to read her section on Dionysus a few times to really understand this genealogy and the aesthetic difference between Aeschylus’s Oresteia and Euripides’s Bacchae. I’ll get there conceptually. If you don’t mind me asking, and to the best of your knowledge. Was Nietzsche the first to make such distinction between pre and post Socratic Athens?
@hardwoodthought1213
@hardwoodthought1213 8 ай бұрын
@@Dino_Medici Paglia is a good author to read in relation to Apollonian/Dionysian (especially as she’s one of the few who pushes it onto contemporary and recent historical figures). And from what I’m aware of, yes. Other thinkers such as Francis Bacon had touched on the Pre-Socratic philosophers (although he largely disagreed with them), but Nietzsche from what I’ve read was the first to create as large a distinction past the simple philosophy of Socrates and those before him.
@uscbro69
@uscbro69 Жыл бұрын
How many ads can yu cram into this thing…jesus
Our culture is sick. Here's why.
40:03
Weltgeist
Рет қаралды 237 М.
Nietzsche and Dionysus: Tragedy and the Affirmation of Life
18:36
Academy of Ideas
Рет қаралды 677 М.
Running With Bigger And Bigger Lunchlys
00:18
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 92 МЛН
From Small To Giant Pop Corn #katebrush #funny #shorts
00:17
Kate Brush
Рет қаралды 69 МЛН
Как подписать? 😂 #shorts
00:10
Денис Кукояка
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Миллионер | 1 - серия
34:31
Million Show
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН
Friedrich Nietzsche: The Birth of Tragedy
12:38
Epoch Philosophy
Рет қаралды 64 М.
Why Nietzsche Loved Thucydides
28:03
Weltgeist
Рет қаралды 90 М.
Why Schopenhauer Hated Hegel
24:42
Weltgeist
Рет қаралды 92 М.
NIETZSCHE Explained: Twilight of the Idols (all parts)
26:30
Weltgeist
Рет қаралды 66 М.
Why Jesus Isn't a Hero | Nietzsche
20:31
Weltgeist
Рет қаралды 152 М.
Freud LIED When He Denied Nietzsche's Influence
1:19:44
essentialsalts
Рет қаралды 14 М.
Why Hypocrisy is So Annoying
26:24
Unsolicited advice
Рет қаралды 48 М.
Why Nietzsche Didn't HATE the Stoics (It's Complicated)
12:00
Weltgeist
Рет қаралды 62 М.
Running With Bigger And Bigger Lunchlys
00:18
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 92 МЛН