How Bernard Arnault Ruined Fashion

  Рет қаралды 216,482

Fashionlover4

Fashionlover4

Күн бұрын

Changed up the format for this vid as I did not have much stock footage, not sure if I like taking up the whole frame with my face but oh well. I'm very curious to see the general response to this video, I always feel like I've missed stuff but at least I try. Enjoy.
The truth behind Raf Simons' success in the early 2000s on Patreon,
/ fashionlover4
SOCIALS: linktr.ee/hotf...
Main Sources:
www.telegraph....
www.forbes.com...
www.theguardia...
www.vanityfair...
www.thefashion...
www.businessof...
• Why Objectivity Has Be...

Пікірлер: 704
@understitchYT
@understitchYT Жыл бұрын
Hot take: bernard arnault has been on the verge of crashing big name luxury brands for maybe the last 20 years. The reason luxury was luxury in the 90s was because it FELT untouchable. The prices were actually more accessible than they are today, but they FELT exclusive. Arnault popularised luxury goods to the point where they are now very saturated in the market, but at the same time lowered the quality of the goods. They are more costly and worse quality now than in the 80s or 90s. By over exposure and underdelivery of these brands is causing the brands to lose value to their initial customer and it's undoubted that that has started to come through to the mass market already. I think itll eventually see less and less sales until they change their focus to be away from never ending growth and aquiesce to just making quality goods again to stop cheapening the brands
@Devananta-Rafiq
@Devananta-Rafiq Жыл бұрын
Good take tbh
@Philosific
@Philosific Жыл бұрын
You and youtuber are clueless on LVMH. Its arguable that LVMH has actually done more to preserve high fashion than anyone else and hence why they lead the market with their brands. Its not a coincidence. Fashion was cheapen by America. It was called Accessible Luxury and was pushed by social media. If you actually take a look, LVMH doesnt own an “accessible” luxury brand. No LVMH brand does discounting. Arnault is very clear that he believe luxury is for those who can afford high quality. Further, if you took time to actually look through, LVMH doesnt outsource its supplies. They own all the facilities that source their supplies and ingredients for their brands. They literally bought the manufacturer that supplies Tiffany’s just last week. This is for the specific purpose of meeting their quality standard and gives them full control over that. Both of you are clueless.
@understitchYT
@understitchYT Жыл бұрын
@@Philosific Sorry, but I think you may have misunderstood. The percieved accessibility of the brands comes from a cultural awareness of the brands and how many products are sold/seen in public. The prices, as I mentioned, are higher, so they are, in theory, less accessible, but yet they FEEL so much more. What he did was make the brands famous, he made them more for the average person than they were before. Today everyone wants to, and many people do, own a Louis Vuitton, or other, bag, whereas in the 80s it was something only those interested would invest in. What LVMH (and others, not just them) have done is make luxury *culturally* accessible, which reduces its exclusivity and therefore its perceived value to those who were the original customer. This is why brands like Roger Vivier and Loro Piana have also seen an increase in sales, because those original customers are unpersuaded by the fame of the big names now. In regards to them not outsourcing, you are half right, LVMH owns nearly all of their production line and really was a leader in that regard, but each individual business outsources to another to get what they need, a good example is that Thelios makes all the sunglasses for all the LVMH brands, so Louis Vuitton outsources sunglass production to Thelios. They all run independantly and charge each other for their services, so it is not done in house.
@TheCul8
@TheCul8 Жыл бұрын
@@Philosific”no LVMH brand does discounting”… Calvin Klein ???
@hishamziard8473
@hishamziard8473 Жыл бұрын
@Finesso the irony. We got nothing in Australia rn. Even dion lee is based in NYC. Gots to show some love for whatever we got left in Australia
@guezelguese8738
@guezelguese8738 Жыл бұрын
Speaking of the quality of luxury goods dwindlin in recent years, Arnault harassed a goup of french journalists for showing that lvm bags weren't produced in France like what they claim but they were fabricated in a factory in romania with low wage salaries.
@lafeil
@lafeil Жыл бұрын
I agree
@curlyhairdudeify
@curlyhairdudeify Жыл бұрын
And the materials made in China...
@pa5666
@pa5666 Жыл бұрын
So many bags now say "Made in China" that they are absolutely crazy to charge the prices they are. This is how brainwashed the consumers are in still buying their products. You can argue that they buy it simply because they can afford it, but when is enough enough?
@jillianmaloney3798
@jillianmaloney3798 Жыл бұрын
By harassed do u mean blacklisted? I used to work in the industry, ppl kill over “get” gigs too. Killary Clinton isn’t the only one out their suiciding ppl.
@rivkahhaubner7498
@rivkahhaubner7498 Жыл бұрын
Your comment about taking fashion as seriously as we take food, shelter, and water brings me to a point on the importance of fiber in clothing. Most people have no idea what their clothes are made of. A majority of clothing is made with harsh chemicals and plastic. It’s interesting that the same people who will refuse to eat anything nonorganic are willing to wear the furthest thing from organic. It demonstrates how differently we view clothes versus other essentials.
@joannafraser2789
@joannafraser2789 Жыл бұрын
Molly Mae
@silverhawkroman
@silverhawkroman Жыл бұрын
Not even clothes, everything. Limited time and money make humans go coocoo which is why we're in such a shxtter nowadays
@RAVENJOHN-yo7is
@RAVENJOHN-yo7is Жыл бұрын
read Walden he touches on this in the book
@Angelina6518
@Angelina6518 Жыл бұрын
I’ve only worn natural fibers.
@i.1213
@i.1213 Жыл бұрын
This comment made me think… you’re absolutely right.
@wearlucinda
@wearlucinda Жыл бұрын
Your point about LVMH basically controlling the fashion media is so important. It upholds the brainwashing, for lack of a better word, that these brands have intrinsic value and are worth the high $$$. I hope that as we go into this recession, people care less about designer brands and consume less. I've been consuming fashion media (from magazines to the internet) since I was in elementary school, and I still am trying to unlearn some of these hyper-consumerist ideas we've all been fed.
@-lavender-777
@-lavender-777 Жыл бұрын
❤️☺️
@Sansaar1331
@Sansaar1331 Жыл бұрын
Pure Mk ultred
@ellehoods1745
@ellehoods1745 Жыл бұрын
Reading fashion articles wether in print or online lately has been just shopping lists! The covers are so incredibly boring now that with that and word salad that roughly describes the pieces briefly there's nothing of value anymore to take from it. It's incredibly tired everywhere I look! There is no more authors voice or personality. I miss looking forward to articles from particular journalists. There is no personality in runway, on paper, or even advertisement anymore.
@MsLS8
@MsLS8 Жыл бұрын
unfortunately, there is for example China - full of people where brand so imprinted into the way of life- arguably perhaps due to lack of good education and critical thinking- young people idolise the actors and hooked on shows where these brands invest lots of money - which result in huge long queues in front of branded stores… I hear now stories where lots of young Chinese get themselves into huge debts and struggle to live without parents’ help ….how about the bloggers who ‘advertise’ the branded stuff and if they don’t have sponsors such as the appropriate wealthy ancestors or husbands - have side jobs (often murky - prostitution etc)
@user-zc9zt2vl5s
@user-zc9zt2vl5s Жыл бұрын
All these rich people who own these companies are satanic pedophiles. I've been seeing the pattern and it runs also throughout other industries like music, entertainment (hollywood), financial institutions, academia, adult entertainment, sports, etc. These people are pure evil and sick. Fashion is dead, along with hip-hop, and politics and so many other things. Life is getting so corupted with social media and technology. We need to go back to the simpler days.
@Melbnolan
@Melbnolan Жыл бұрын
Arnault destroyed and continues to destroy the brands in this space. His latest acquisition, Tiffany has already lost its heritage and heart. You can see it and feel it in their ad campaigns and stores.
@michaelbruno1330
@michaelbruno1330 Жыл бұрын
Yes i agree! Whoever thought jay z and Beyonce should be in Tiffany ad needs to be fired!
@p10rambo
@p10rambo Жыл бұрын
gatekeepers are funny
@henpiaoliang
@henpiaoliang Жыл бұрын
I’m looking forward to the next trophy Tiffany decides to ruin!
@Gilbertify1
@Gilbertify1 Жыл бұрын
Tiffany is granny brand anyway
@emajjabowen6748
@emajjabowen6748 Жыл бұрын
@@michaelbruno1330why shouldn’t JayZ and Beyoncé be in the ads? I’d like to understand what you’re trying to say.
@bluepearlgirl-emelie
@bluepearlgirl-emelie Жыл бұрын
Not only fashion but all makeup brands have been scooped up by Estee Lauder. Corporations kill all things cool, innovating and progressive. All we are left with is homogenized crap that is over priced with no style. All of these corporations are all interlinked and it is one huge circle jerk that removes any chance of true style!
@bjklein444
@bjklein444 Жыл бұрын
Didn't Estee Lauder buy Tom Ford for 2.8 billion recently? I'm watching to see if they start merging lines or stay with identifiable distinction of brand lines? 💄
@SerenityChaos1975
@SerenityChaos1975 Жыл бұрын
EL own many but not all cosmetics, there are still lots of indie brands that are more popular than ever and the quality is amazing. Many cosmetic companies, even indie brands can have their products made by Italian manufacturers, Hermes have recently launched their own brand, there are also a lot of brands owned by celebrities and celebrity make up artists. Estée Lauder do own a lot of the popular fragrances also, which would be the main reason they acquired TF, sadly. The quality will only diminish now, like everything else they have purchased.
@bjklein444
@bjklein444 Жыл бұрын
@@SerenityChaos1975 This is very true. The lowered quality of high end and cosmetic counter brands are making it really difficult to make exclusivity and high pricing worth the purchase. Several of the indie brands are of good quality and is creatively branded. "Boutique" marketing like Sephora is popular for a reason. People still like "hands on" sales and marketing campaigns for cosmetics and fragrances though.
@CogMarks
@CogMarks Жыл бұрын
Estée Lauder reformulates the fragrances it buys. They generally come off as being watered down.
@bjklein444
@bjklein444 Жыл бұрын
@@CogMarks youth dew was the original perfume? It was strong and (I believe) obnoxious? Very few others, I really didn't care for... the fragrance market is volatile (pun intended). Marc Jacobs, Ed Hardy, along with some of the original design houses like Chanel, had the best consistency in the fragrance lines.
@TheSympathize
@TheSympathize Жыл бұрын
A lot of these brands are going to end up in the toilet, because the unlimited growth model absolutely necessitates a decrease in creative risk-taking, a reduction in the use of quality material, and reducing the cost of labor by utilizing a smaller, overworked, cheap labor force. You can only squeeze so hard before these conglomerates squeeze these brands dry until the illusion of luxury and art fades away to reveal a commodity that is unrecognizable from its origins. Case in point being Chanel increasing the costs of its handbags for example, while clients have grumbled that there’s been a noticeable drop in quality.
@mcd4370
@mcd4370 Жыл бұрын
It’s wild Chanel had three price increases in 2021 when their quality continues to decrease. They are selling low quality imprecise machine made goods at Hermès handmade prices. A brand like Hermès has incredible handmade craftsmanship but clearly isn’t as big as Chanel as a brand. Chanel has become very commercial. Even their Haute Couture shows look commercial. People who always wanted the classic Chanel flap bad no longer want to buy it because of the low quality and increasing prices. It’s just not worth it.
@piscinaiv7937
@piscinaiv7937 Жыл бұрын
it's funny too because now that they've gotten a large swathe of the market accustomed to paying higher premiums, they actually allow positions for competition to come in with an ACTUAL premium product, at the inflated cost required to make something with actual quality now being more accepted by customers. For me indie/cottage brands will always be more interesting.
@pa5666
@pa5666 Жыл бұрын
That type of growth model is whats ruining the economy as a whole. The elite in charge are so detached from reality that they don't realize it's approaching the breaking point.
@pa5666
@pa5666 Жыл бұрын
@@piscinaiv7937 I wholeheartedly agree with you. The only people still buying from these brands have no style or taste and rely solely on the name to make them feel good. It's horrible how low these houses have sunk.
@Mandroid45
@Mandroid45 Жыл бұрын
I want to believe you but i don't. With current media and capitalism people consumers with no real interest in fashion will continue to support these brands
@tentimetex
@tentimetex Жыл бұрын
His model is vertical integration to achieve economies of scale. When you bought a brand like Dior for example, you were buying the Craftsmanship of French artisans, who made the products in France by hand in ateliers, the European quality materials, the Dior know-how and history and the brand image. Now, you are just buying the brand image and nothing else. He buys independent houses, vertically integrates them (so that basically most of the products for all the brands just come from the same factories in Vietnam, he just slaps a different brand name on them), and creates economies of scale. It has made him rich but also destroyed everything that was good about these products. It was a huge opportunity that he spotted: ''China and new markets in the East are opening up. I can expand the product ranges by slapping the brand on lower quality products to make way more money. These brands are too small and dont have the capital to expand enough to scale to meet this demand. If i buy them up, i can just get rid of the costly French work shops with expensive French workers, make everything from the same factories in Asia and just put the brand names on the products accordingly, i'll increase profit margins AND take advantage of the huge markets opening up in China and the East, which are thirsty for these kind of products''. Yeah.
@pa5666
@pa5666 Жыл бұрын
You summed it up perfectly. I feel like buying vintage is the way to go now. Most of the pieces coming out of these brands today are tacky anyway. I can't believe how well Gucci did with their awful looking clothing. Nouveau riche taste, yet was trendy enough to also influence old money to buy. It's like the whole world is hypnotized.
@karigrandii
@karigrandii Жыл бұрын
The last point is so good. Don’t just consume social media and media. Read books. Make up your own world, not just what tiktok and yt people say.
@user-bf3yh6ue7p
@user-bf3yh6ue7p Жыл бұрын
Idk some youtube people like this one are pretty good
@MisterWebb
@MisterWebb Жыл бұрын
This yt person is here to tell you to go take a flying leap
@user-zc9zt2vl5s
@user-zc9zt2vl5s Жыл бұрын
All these rich people who own these companies are satanic pedophiles. I've been seeing the pattern and it runs also throughout other industries like music, entertainment (hollywood), financial institutions, academia, adult entertainment, sports, etc. These people are pure evil and sick. Fashion is dead, along with hip-hop, and politics and so many other things. Life is getting so corupted with social media and technology. We need to go back to the simpler days.
@angelachanellehuang5663
@angelachanellehuang5663 Жыл бұрын
Forgot fashions
@LathropLdST
@LathropLdST Жыл бұрын
😂😂 sweet summer child. Books are no panacea and can only take you so far!
@teamskdm1
@teamskdm1 Жыл бұрын
luxury houses are just expensive fast fashion at the end of the day . thats why so many designers are leaving the big houses to start their own labels.
@krista7031
@krista7031 Жыл бұрын
This is so interesting as someone who's rly into fashion and is a business student- fashion rly starts to feel so fake from the business perspective of branding to make more money.. i love the creativity and beauty, but trends cycles will keep going on and on wasting so much resources, and to make more money. Unfortunately most ppl in the creative side of fashion don't have the business knowledge to grow and keep companies succesful to the extent these business people do, and the result is this. I wish more people studied business theory just to understand how the biggest organizations in the world work.
@fashionlover4
@fashionlover4 Жыл бұрын
I agree, from what I've heard from some fashion students, they are barely taught much business which I think is an absolute shame and really not setting them up for success. Art is hard as it is to be successful in.
@hiwelcometochillis2579
@hiwelcometochillis2579 Жыл бұрын
Actually this big corporations (LVMH French fashion and Kerig the ones that own saint Laurent Balenciaga and Italian fashion etc)persecutes small new businesses... they have their ways to take them off the spot
@GoBizBaz
@GoBizBaz 4 ай бұрын
​@@hiwelcometochillis2579almost like big sharks devouring small 🐟
@user-pb3cg9qb4w
@user-pb3cg9qb4w Жыл бұрын
One thing I do like about this business model/arnault is that I believe it allows for Haute Couture to continue at most houses with a great budget even if it’s extremely unprofitable.
@fashionlover4
@fashionlover4 Жыл бұрын
There are some seemingly positive aspects to the model for sure, you could also mention the LVMH prize for young fashion designers, although I personally feel like haute couture would still continue if the model changed and could even become more profitable if people are start valuing artisanal clothing again. Therefore, I don't feel like I can attribute haute couture as a positive benefit of this current business model but rather a tradition that these brands must uphold to keep their heritage.
@davidpachecogarcia
@davidpachecogarcia Жыл бұрын
Another excellent video bro! 🖤 One thing I’ve noticed in the past few years is hiker/sustainable fashion becoming an exploitative niche in fashion. I’m a huge Patagonia fan and always thought their stuff was semi expensive but justified because they’re using more sustainable methods to produce products, lifetime warranty, and extremely generous return policy. So then comes Nike and other larger brands who are charging more for their hiking/“sustainable” products. Which doesn’t make sense in my head because of all the outsourced working conditions we alway hear about them and the amount of product they flood the market with. No way are their methods more expensive with the amount of factories they own and business they get. But I’d be a hypocrite if I if I said I don’t own some of their pieces. 😔 I guess the difference being is that when I put on a Patagonia product on I never question if it will hold up to the elements…unlike Nike which is pure aesthetic.
@twocancan
@twocancan Жыл бұрын
@dafinkarnik counterpoint: Patagonia offers lifetime warranty and free repairs. That's what justifies Patagonia's high price for me. I also prefer Patagonia's more classic styles because I know I'll still be able to wear them 10 years out over Nike's overly trendy styles.
@bobhob35
@bobhob35 Жыл бұрын
As a watch owner and enthusiast this really makes sense. LVMH owns Hublot and Tag watches and both brands have become overpriced and stale in their design language in the last 5 years. To the extent people in the watch community now openly mock people wearing them. Tag Heuer in particular has a fantastic heritage of motorsport in past collections to draw on and yet the latest big hype realise is a watch with Mario Cart pictures on it for £26,000. It’s shameful 😢
@Carmen-rb1pl
@Carmen-rb1pl Жыл бұрын
That is so true! Highly agree with that😢
@birdie4263
@birdie4263 Жыл бұрын
Wow, that is embarrassing 😳
@Devananta-Rafiq
@Devananta-Rafiq Жыл бұрын
This aspect makes the Japan or even Antwerp's way of doing fashion business are somewhat more interesting for me. Their work are not screaming greed or devalued the art form for profit sake.
@fashionlover4
@fashionlover4 Жыл бұрын
Interesting Japanese fashion does come off very well made and made with substance, however Japan is a very consumerist society mainly because of how they sort of idolized the US post WW2 and their culture. Artistically made things can also be exploited unfortunately, I think limited quality does wonders when it comes to making things truly special.
@MisterWebb
@MisterWebb Жыл бұрын
@@fashionlover4 How is Japan any more consumerist than Europe or the US? If the Japanese were influenced by the Americans, shouldn’t Americans be more consumerist than the Japanese?
@emismith4655
@emismith4655 Жыл бұрын
@@MisterWebb he never said it was.
@Shordy9.09
@Shordy9.09 Жыл бұрын
I love this guys view point. Over consumption isn’t cool honestly enjoying art or falling in love with the things you already own
@SPACEDOUT19
@SPACEDOUT19 Жыл бұрын
if you want to see true over consumption to the point of debt, look at fragrance community. its downright sad, and there, people are persuaded to spend more easily
@princessdyn
@princessdyn Жыл бұрын
Buying secondhand/vintage fits my beliefs of sustainable fashion, conscious consumption, focus on quality of trends, and originality. Instead of playing the Hermès game or buying expensive LV bags, I found bags from Delvaux and Mark Cross (Belgian and US heritage from 1829 and 1865) for under $50 - 500 that still look perfect though they were made in 1980-1990. Such quality is rare and I can't wait to give them to my daughter in 20 years 😊
@nimityaka
@nimityaka Жыл бұрын
I have few leather bags of Belgian brand Mazarin. They’re are 10 years old already and I still have them, they’re unkillable 😂 I don’t see the point of buying super expensive bags rather than to impress people.
@michz9304
@michz9304 Жыл бұрын
Really enjoyed your commentary on this topic! I was at the YSL museum in Marrakech a few weeks ago and being there made me remember why I fell in love with fashion as a teen - and why I fell out. There was this video showcasing the history of ysl and the stories behind the clothes and it was so touching - real art! And then it got to the current age and yeah... That's why I fell out. Feel the same way! New sub here :)
@blacksocrates1
@blacksocrates1 Жыл бұрын
Is it a stretch to say this phenomenon has affected almost all consumable mediums of art? Tv, movies, music...everything seems increasingly bereft of real artistic expression. Instead, I feel there is just some checklist that is checked off by market analysis to produce things for massive consumption. You cannot have real art without taking artistic risk!
@rowancoyote8330
@rowancoyote8330 Жыл бұрын
This was an almost impossibly good summary of why the fashion industry has been in decline for a few decades now. As someone who has worked in fashion and media for those decades, I have to congratulate you for doing such a fantastic job. Nailed it.
@cheers6043
@cheers6043 Жыл бұрын
Only thing I’ve ever liked Bernard for is helpin Galliano’s rise as a designer. His neoliberal model for the fashion industry has really made me sad tho, it’s kinda why my passion for fashion has been dyin a bit.
@cheers6043
@cheers6043 Жыл бұрын
Great video also and I haven’t even finished it.
@User61918
@User61918 Жыл бұрын
Keep your passion brodie. Dgaf about these conglomerates or industries. There’ll come a time when grassroot art/fashion has it’s place at the top. As time passes more and more people will be less inclined to buy from these weird ass soulless fashion houses.
@jonnyfendi2003
@jonnyfendi2003 Жыл бұрын
Yes and they still own John Gallianos name. I wish John would leave Margiela and LVMH gave John his label again. Can you imagine!!
@nasc1008
@nasc1008 Жыл бұрын
@@User61918 truth in this
@michaelbruno1330
@michaelbruno1330 Жыл бұрын
@@jonnyfendi2003 actually they sold the Galliano label a while ago
@cassiejacobs4197
@cassiejacobs4197 Жыл бұрын
Every family has that one person who will break the family's financial struggle, I hope you become the one 😊
@popsarah7805
@popsarah7805 Жыл бұрын
I'm looking for something to venture into on a short term basis, I have about $6k sitting in my savings
@christopherhobb7702
@christopherhobb7702 Жыл бұрын
Obviously trading in bitcoin is very volatile and risky to trade that's the reason most traders trade with a company
@christopherhobb7702
@christopherhobb7702 Жыл бұрын
Now is the best time to purchase and invest in Bitcoin stop procrastinating
@markdamascus7878
@markdamascus7878 Жыл бұрын
I advice everyone to start investing and never rely on just salary. No billionaire made it through salary
@popsarah7805
@popsarah7805 Жыл бұрын
I'm new to this Bitcoin trading, how do I get started with the help of a professional
@Jessiestyle
@Jessiestyle Жыл бұрын
you speak the truth! Having worked for a few larger fashion conglomerates it's risky to have a youtube...and I had to make a choice to speak my mind and have a youtube or obey the company
@czyh
@czyh Жыл бұрын
the thing you said about buying used bad garments at the end of the video is so true, for the last 2 years i have in my mind where i want to be in how i dress but ive been stuck in a loop of selling stuff i dont like anymore because my taste change, and then buying new stuff that i dont like again. i just bought some lanvin curbs and when they arrived i didnt even know why i bought them. the silhouette is cool but not effective at all if youre not trying to look like a hypebeast who wears tight lanvin text tshirts
@fiftyclown
@fiftyclown Жыл бұрын
Stop making choices like spending £500 on hype shoes and find a designer you love and spend that money you clearly have on runway pieces and runway pieces only. Problem solved
@saul1491
@saul1491 Жыл бұрын
@@fiftyclown buying only runway doesn’t mean your tastes don’t change. your tastes do change.
@fiftyclown
@fiftyclown Жыл бұрын
@@saul1491 Your " taste " isn't supposed to drastically life alteringly change every few months, if it does you're a victim of the micro trend cycle overconsumption effect the brands u buy from perpetuate. The more u spend on clothes the more u actually have to think about it. Most people don't think 4 times before buying a garment bc like OP said, you can "sell it on", everything is disposable apparently
@fiftyclown
@fiftyclown Жыл бұрын
@@saul1491 His taste didn't change lol, he subconsciously bought something with no character, based on trends, doesn't resonate with his self expression without thinking about it properly
@karigrandii
@karigrandii Жыл бұрын
Buy only second hand/thrift and dont spend hundreds on a piece. Hold only a limited amount of clothes and limit how many you can buy a year. Only buy things you think you need not want. I know the urge of wanting somthing really bad but if you just dont buy it you will forget it, because you lived life without it so why couldn you not do that now?
@BlueAlien1313
@BlueAlien1313 Жыл бұрын
Mcqueen brought life, excitement, and moving art to fashion. No one wanted to go to other fashion shows. They all wanted front seats at McQueen's I am really suspicious about his death. Look at his brand now. Not the same. Another designer that rule the 80s died suspiciously as well.
@gustavvigolo4480
@gustavvigolo4480 Жыл бұрын
The reason why is called the "Vebel Effect" it goes against normal demand, as the desire for something grows the more expensive it is. "Luxury items" have this effect
@brakh777
@brakh777 Жыл бұрын
quickly becoming one of my favorite youtubers each and every video has been super thought provoking really helping me understand more than just the world of fashion
@fashionlover4
@fashionlover4 Жыл бұрын
Thank you! gonna try do more videos that relate fashion to the rest of the world and other topics!
@kion1435
@kion1435 Жыл бұрын
love your content & recs!! i have an interview with dior this week and i was already second guessing about working under such an enormous parent group… idk if i should take this vid as a sign lol
@him4690
@him4690 Жыл бұрын
Gain insight ND grow ur ting maybe
@kion1435
@kion1435 Жыл бұрын
@@him4690 ty! maybe you’re onto smth……😳💪🏼
@saul1491
@saul1491 Жыл бұрын
go for it i reckon. it’s an interview, and it would surely be cool to see how it’s run. you can’t exist without indulging in the system
@kion1435
@kion1435 Жыл бұрын
@@saul1491 dude you’re right! reading your comment helped me realize my career path a bit better :)
@fashionlover4
@fashionlover4 Жыл бұрын
Best of luck, I understand that it's hard to exist without somewhat participating in the current system. Get insight, experience and contacts and maybe down the line you can join or start something you believe in more.
@ruzzelladrian907
@ruzzelladrian907 Жыл бұрын
Bernard Arnault said that Apple isn’t a luxury brand. I think he’s just jealous that Apple has super high profit margins on their products. Profit margins only luxury brands like Hermés can pull off. There’s somewhat of a hasty and bitter aftertaste to his comment. He underestimates Apple’s luxury position, because Apple doesn’t shout luxury to people, and that’s by design; to not scare people away. Arnault’s products are dependent on being exclusive and expensive. Sell too much in the market and risk saturating the exclusivity of the brand. Apple can sell as many as they want without diluting its brand. Because the “luxury” experience is in its software user-experience. It’s not just the tangible product that is the “luxury” aspect. It is the access to the services and the infrastructure that Apple built. And the price of admission is $800 - $1000. You can’t make calls, browse the internet, and listen to music on a $1500 Neverfull tote bag.
@ruthwezeman6700
@ruthwezeman6700 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for making this, it’s so important. Also, I recommend the book “Deluxe: How Luxury Lost its Luster” by Dana Thomas, it’s really a good read on the same theme.
@lonnylegeam
@lonnylegeam Жыл бұрын
You gotta do one on Francois Pinault as well. He too owns a lot of fashion brands too.
@JB-pd3ir
@JB-pd3ir Жыл бұрын
Yes, please on one on him also.
@anthth
@anthth Жыл бұрын
Yes please
@mrsmith8224
@mrsmith8224 Жыл бұрын
It is shocking to me when people are buying LVMH collabs and believe it is something woww They do zero research and have no idea that these collabs are selling tricks of LVMH
@davidweissner3489
@davidweissner3489 Жыл бұрын
I've covered photo and video of the New York Fashion Week runways from about 2004 through 2019 and I stumbled on your KZbin Fashionlover 4 post and learned a lot of what I did not know. Thank you for letting the industry know what was going on behind the scenes. If you have time, please let me know what you think of my runway show videos. Over the years I have noticed changes. I posted them on KZbin as an online archive and I am still working on it.
@malpertuis.
@malpertuis. Жыл бұрын
This is heartbreaking! I just checked and they own guerlain - maybe that explains why they stopped putting any energy into their classic scents - all the bottles, all the same. They used to put so much in the symbolism of the bottle and toppers. Now its all for the new releases and the vintage dont even get parfum releases. sorry. rant over - thank you for this enlightening video xo
@ponta419
@ponta419 Жыл бұрын
I really enjoyed your video and I didn't know how much Bernard Arnault had an bad effect on fashion. Im french and actually i was born in the same city as arnault did but its far different now from when bernard arnault was younger. This city (Roubaix) now is the poorest city in france because all the textile factories closed from the decision of lvmh and others. People lost their jobs and basically this city never got better economicaly.
@bonita-u9ve
@bonita-u9ve Жыл бұрын
Factories closing all over not only in textiles in France but most importantly Europe all traditional crafts ,lace ,buttons knitwear handbags and haberdashery ,garments etc all moved to Indonesia and China . A big loss to manufacturing which took an upturn after the war and now all those people have passed on .Which means no jobs any more only sweat shops .Any baton ; passed to the person who rescued and saved these companies from liquidation doesn't necessarily pass the finish line first
@ponta419
@ponta419 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your comment im really impressed how much people is aware about this issue
@Lucretciela
@Lucretciela Жыл бұрын
"It was only a small business of 1,000 people" How incredibly out of touch
@remittri
@remittri Жыл бұрын
Sooo true. Still I really love the work that is done by designers at these big houses even these days but now that I've got a job and can occasionally afford a couple pieces, man I realized I get so much more joy out of learning to make my own items and working up to quality materials and purchasing goods made by independent sellers than this high fashion crap. Think about how much gorgeous material you can buy with the prices they charge for these things -- the upmark is not worth it. On another note it does make me sad how creating for yourself is so far far far lower than what fashion houses design. People who teach you how to craft, usually have no style at all. They don't even know what it is. -- You go look for patterns or tutorials or embroidery files and guess what it is? The ugliest, frumpiest people telling you how to make the ugliest frumpiest things from poodle and baby yoda fat cotton quarters. Come on! Why is there THAT much of a disconnect? I suppose they're still better than the LV neverfull dior scarf girls...
@remittri
@remittri Жыл бұрын
Oh yeah, and it's funny to me all these y'all semi-communist kids in the chat. The world is made of money. You're a cog in the money machine as well, just cause you spit a little of your disgust at suited businessmen trading the world away doesn't make you "above" it all. I agree it's bitter but it's not sunshine and rainbows in the 90s fashion world either even though it sure feels that way. There's nothing but conglomerates these days because independent designers don't need them anymore. The internet makes you free.
@bonita-u9ve
@bonita-u9ve Жыл бұрын
Yes preach !!
@fashionlover4
@fashionlover4 Жыл бұрын
Great points! I've been there too and have just gone to making my own patterns but I know that all takes a lot of work. I would recommend modeliste studio for unique and well made patterns although they don't usually include the whole pattern just like an interesting sleeve, so you still have some work to do. In future, when I start up my own brand I had the idea of selling full patterns to the clothes for people to make them themselves.
@TriggaTreDay
@TriggaTreDay Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂 so true.
@JoMomma
@JoMomma Жыл бұрын
Thank you for reminding me why I didn't purdue a career as a patternmaker in the _fashion_ industry!
@jerrywright5411
@jerrywright5411 Жыл бұрын
I'm curious about the relationship of the top brands in the fashion and the Natzis. There's a lot of dark money that runs through it all.
@victoryspirit
@victoryspirit Жыл бұрын
kering is the reason why hedi slimanes reign at saint laurent was cut short. selling off the the beauty line to l’oreal, cheapening the brand as well as never reestablishing the couture line at saint laurent were all reasons why hedi left. such a shame to see what could’ve been more fall apart so sudden.
@cindypappas253
@cindypappas253 Жыл бұрын
I would hire you in a heart beat to work for our brand as an advisor! You are terrific, and a completely decent human being! Thank you again for this information breakdown.
@deeringkendrick8388
@deeringkendrick8388 Жыл бұрын
Arnault's business strategy is to create a fashion monopoly. He buys the competitors, thereby stifling the competition. Capitalist never like to compete. Some LVMH brands are clearly preferred, and get most of the company's resources allocated toward them, while others have their creativity held in abeyance.
@cc.s3850
@cc.s3850 Жыл бұрын
Make your own clothing! All you need is a sewing machine, fabric, threads, etc and paper to make a pattern .... I started with 12 to make my own things and became a seamstress. I worked 38 years in the textile industry. I still make most of my clothing myself!
@layadaya
@layadaya Жыл бұрын
this!!!
@surpriseimblack
@surpriseimblack Жыл бұрын
Can you support yourself doing that?
@pa5666
@pa5666 Жыл бұрын
I wish it were that easy. I simply have no talent for that type of work, but that would be a dream for me if I could.
@RomeoFinance
@RomeoFinance Жыл бұрын
Wanna start making my own clothes while selling some under my own label one day
@imarip9781
@imarip9781 Жыл бұрын
@@pa5666 the only way to become good at it is to practice
@tzegoh333
@tzegoh333 Ай бұрын
My mum is a CEO, and so she is the ideal target consumer for these luxury houses, and even she said that these fashion brands are now so common that it's like shopping in " insert equivalant mid-price store in your hometown".
@Darth_Bateman
@Darth_Bateman Жыл бұрын
We’re headed for cyberpunk dystopia aren’t we?
@bluepearlgirl-emelie
@bluepearlgirl-emelie Жыл бұрын
I had to freeze frame it when you mentioned that he was going to pass the business down to his 5 children.. Just take a look at how they are dressed in that family portrait! How can you run all the fashion houses in the world and have suits that fit that badly and be dressed so boringly! We are in big trouble if these kids are the future of fashion!!
@sarahberney
@sarahberney Жыл бұрын
My thought exactly!
@TheFakeyCakeMaker
@TheFakeyCakeMaker Жыл бұрын
I don't fashion, I don't why people are so big into it, I don't get what people are looking at or seeing but I understand business and this video is brilliant because not only is it completely on point regarding business and marketing but it's really helped me to understand even just a little about what fashion is and why it's important. Great stuff.
@seamlab8870
@seamlab8870 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely right. Glad I listened. I also decided to not pursue fashion. I’m an independent seamstress. However I think every industry is being run like this. I don’t understand people running after these logos in order for their prestige to somehow rub off … and giving these huge corporations much more money than they are worth. Just one comment is for you to choose a blank background or something a lot tidier, I almost disregarded your video due to my eyes bleeding j/k.
@SerenityChaos1975
@SerenityChaos1975 Жыл бұрын
It’s my understanding that Hermes is the only luxury brand because of the quality of materials, they only accept the best leathers, they grow their own silk and vetiver and their leather items are hand sewn using traditional saddlery techniques. The rest are fashion brands, you did say that at the end. 😊
@cindypappas253
@cindypappas253 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this amazing information breakdown. With the Balenciaga scandal, this breaks down the industry for me in an easy to understand format. The flow charts have been incredibly helpful! From Ohio!
@Cho0segoose
@Cho0segoose Жыл бұрын
So this is the guy that Kanye is always dissing
@EricCRO
@EricCRO Жыл бұрын
I think you conclusion and recs is great. This is what I do, and I’m glad you mentioned it. But again, most consumers don’t want to do what we both believe. They want Gucci they are not fashion and art people
@papa_puff
@papa_puff Жыл бұрын
95 million and profited 500 million totally not sketchy
@fashionlover4
@fashionlover4 Жыл бұрын
That happened over a couple years after acquiring the company. He did not acquire the company for *80 million and sell some of its assets for 500 million straight away but over the next couple of years of sustaining them and cutting jobs. Admittedly though I should have clarified that fact!
@Alexandre-xz6jm
@Alexandre-xz6jm Жыл бұрын
@@fashionlover4 all you say is « ohh im poor, capitalism is bad »
@Justcetriyaart
@Justcetriyaart Жыл бұрын
Honestly it's not like the designers and workers actually get paid that much... and it takes so much time, knowledge and money to launch a whole brand especially with this current media scape that the ai makes it harder to do
@fashionlover4
@fashionlover4 Жыл бұрын
Sure, however designers aren't taught much in terms of business skills either, they're not being set up to start and run their own businesses. AI if anything could be something that levels the playing field for smaller brands that can't afford to hire more workers at first.
@mariazamora6824
@mariazamora6824 Жыл бұрын
very interesting video! Even though YSL is under another big conglomerate, I feel better that my first luxury purchase bears that brand's logo (it was a used bag) and is not under LVMH. actually, I remember when I started researching which bag to get, I saw/read a lot that said YSL has excellent quality bags and they were on the "cheaper" end of the prices. Obviously YSL was never unheard of, I have to say that in the few years since I've gotten my bag, their popularity has grown quite a bit and they're prices are really starting to rise. I'm absolutely NO expert, but I'm starting to feel like Dior is becoming the new Chanel (esp with the plethora of quality issues from Chanel's recent bags) and YSL is becoming the new LV (good quality for more accessible pricing).
@mariazamora6824
@mariazamora6824 Жыл бұрын
@Fashionlover004 um...ok?
@emmaphilo4049
@emmaphilo4049 Жыл бұрын
I like fashion/aesthetics but I find the fashion world disgusting....
@MotorbikeDesign
@MotorbikeDesign Жыл бұрын
Interesting that it is even legal to have such a monopoly. There are several examples in history where companies where forced to split up. One of the most famous examples was the Standard oil by Rockefeller, which was forced to split in 1911. I work as designer in the watch industry where there exist several big groups, where LVMH is one of them. It is sad to see many of the family companies loose control and taken over by groups. I feel the creativity within the companies changes significantly and the identity becomes empty
@Demi1369
@Demi1369 Жыл бұрын
Lose not loose. Lose control vs. loose change.
@lclc42lc
@lclc42lc Жыл бұрын
You shouted out Business of Fashion ( which i love) as an objective and trustworthy site. But BOF The Debrief, said that LVMH does have a minority stake in the site. The Debrief also assures and guarantees their audience that the news, takes, and conclusions are independent, but you can never be too sure. Either way, thought you should know. In the video you cited a vanity fair article that called Francois Pinault a « white knight» In my opinion he’s just the lesser of two evils. For a while, Tom and Dom basically turned Gucci into a conglomerate and acquired brands like Alexander McQueen and YSL. After Tom and dom did the heavy lifting, Francois with Kering came in and took over them all according to agreement. Pinault may not have been as conniving and money hungry as Arnault, but he was lazier. (Which I can respect, work smarter not harder I guess.)
@fashionlover4
@fashionlover4 Жыл бұрын
Interesting I didn't know thanks for letting me know. I said that they were trustworthy as I know of someone who I trust that worked there and vouched for their rigorous fact checking process. White Knight isn't meant to be a good thing, it's just a term for a person or thing that comes to someone's aid.
@dorian51.
@dorian51. Жыл бұрын
Litteraly what kanYe has been saying for years , glad someone else is talking about it !
@davidcantor293
@davidcantor293 Жыл бұрын
As a client advisor at LV... the quality is awful . Unless you get to the high priced ready to wear or exotics and hard sided...... dont even bother.
@u.m.9339
@u.m.9339 Жыл бұрын
Because of this influence, somebody is buying everything, my interest on labels is nearly vanished. I don‘t like it anymore to give my money to almost one person to make him more and possesive. Now these labels for me look cheap in a way… not special. Dagobert Duck Style…
@lizbethdane
@lizbethdane Жыл бұрын
I really appreciated this video and the time/research you took to make it. It's not important to me that everything you said is true in an absolute way, I more appreciate being pushed to think about this in a way I had not before. Thanks!
@amberspecter
@amberspecter Жыл бұрын
Conspiracy theory: He is the son of the coffee expert Buzzfeed featured a few years ago. Change my mind.
@koanzx1
@koanzx1 Жыл бұрын
i don't know anything about fashion and it is not really my domain, but i can tell you that what you described is happening in every field of life, in every industry. Late stage capitalism basically, very few big companies controlling everything and extracting all value soullessly. We can even imagine that eventually one big company willrun the whole world, if we stay under the same economical system. Something like amazon is the prime example of that.
@discoteo
@discoteo Жыл бұрын
Impressive video, I didn't expect it to be as deep and well-researched as it turned out - thank you, and keep it up!
@sciagurrato1831
@sciagurrato1831 Жыл бұрын
Regardless of his background or education, Arnault remains the exemplar par excellence of someone who is only interested in himself and his net worth. He would not be able to design his way out of a doghouse.
@vassilok
@vassilok Жыл бұрын
These mega fashion brands apparently the burn clothes that don’t sell. Like literally incinerate them. Interesting video subject.
@cherylberk4593
@cherylberk4593 Жыл бұрын
Great video, your analysis is spot on.
@FranciscoSilva-dd5pq
@FranciscoSilva-dd5pq Жыл бұрын
Totally agree. The other day I was shopping and I've noticed that the same brands I used to buy just have higher prices, bigger logos and lower quality. The lack of taste and quality is pandemic at the social media generation.
@flohough1870
@flohough1870 Жыл бұрын
Really a great video, I learned a few things I didn't know about Arnault and LVMH. Agree 100% on how we need to be more aware about how these things are made and how we're being fed a lot of crap to get us to buy stuff.
@lirshalev1231
@lirshalev1231 Жыл бұрын
Very interesting pov! Instant subscribe ❤️ I totally agree about product quality going down and prices going up especially for LV buy other brands too Thanks for sharing 💫
@itsmelilas
@itsmelilas Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for the content you're putting out there ! I don't know much about fashion & I mainly consume mainstream media so it's really nice to have some critical point of view as well
@stormzybanksy
@stormzybanksy Жыл бұрын
fantastic video. well-reasoned and researched, and you are very articulate and well-spoken which makes this an easy watch.
@lme4339
@lme4339 Жыл бұрын
Have you read „Gods and Kings“? I think you would love it. It’s about Alexander McQueen and John Galliano.
@jacksonlang6605
@jacksonlang6605 Жыл бұрын
I currently go to fashion school and this entire topic along with seeing the likes of Raf Simmons leave his company and seeing how many designers that we all look up to go away over the years has genuinely really disheartened my interest in pursuing fashion as a whole I hope it gets better
@diannshoemaker6419
@diannshoemaker6419 Жыл бұрын
The truth about Couture, was they were once small, Boutique Houses, DEDICATED, SOLELY, to extrodinary creations for the VERY RICH. Couture is ALWAYS HAND MADE, sewn.. They do NOT work off flat patterns, like a home sewer would. EVERYTHING IS SCULPTED ON THE BODY. This takes, ACTUAL PEOPLE. Numerous fittings, as the creation progresses. But it fits like NOTHING ELSE. The body is NOT FLAT. Little, ACTUAL Couture, happens, TODAY. These fashion houses are merely nunning off fumes, of the LUX Brand, THAT WAS. As well as their reputations, names. THOSE FUEL TODAY'S BRAND. MOST OF THIS STUFF, IS OFF THE RACK. Mass produced. In China. Just like stuff from Target Now, MERELY a business, it was inevitable that they would get greedy. Which, considering the demand, and current markup, which is obscene, should have been unnecsessary. Sadly, too much is never enough. The complaints coming in, on handbags, ALONE, are terrifying, for someone who thought, for $5 GRAND OR MORE, they were buying an investment piece. To me they seem no better than, OR ACTUAL, FAKES.Who the hell knows, what is happening, with the clothes? Arnault has been the driving force, behind this. PROFIT AT ALL COSTS. BUT few care, when people who SEEM rich, are screwed.. Sadly, there is SOMEWHERE, a middle class woman... who saved up for THIS bag, for one small touch of luxury. He screwed her, TOO. .
@rebeccaboudreau7589
@rebeccaboudreau7589 Жыл бұрын
Fascinating! I’m a designer but I’ve found zero inspiration by couturiers for over 15 years…..now I know why the lack of real creativity has been so prevalent. I have been getting inspiration from historic clothing in different cultures in the past, where real craftsmanship and personal artistry was the foundation of personal style
@suyang4505
@suyang4505 Жыл бұрын
So much for showcasing individualism when huge conglomerates dominate the fashion industry
@fabergeegg1722
@fabergeegg1722 Жыл бұрын
Great video and really informative. My mother doesn't like things that have the designer's name on them. She said people are paying for the name instead of seeking quality and elegance. My mother said, if they want me to wear something with the designer's name all over the purse, jewelry, etc. then they should pay me. She said back in the 40s, and 50s, you didn't have the designer plastered all over an item. The items were so elegant, timeless, and the items were such high quality, that you didn't need to ask, is that expensive or is that from a luxury seller or designer, you just knew it and no questions were needed. It just was. BTW, Bernard Arnault sounds like a horrible bully! Designers don't want him, and he forces himself in the company by savvy, slick, cunning, manipulative business tactics, and of course, using his is money and power. I love history and if you think about it, those designer houses are landmarks of history in their own way, and many played a role throughout history. This is tragic!
@AlexHider
@AlexHider 3 ай бұрын
Sure, many fashion brands run out of money due to their creatives not being business oriented, but the solution wasn’t to completely give up on creativity and surrender the brands to the business sharks…..
@pvtghost117
@pvtghost117 Жыл бұрын
Was high fashion different at all before though? Maybe the artist's intention has been to express themselves but for the consumer it has always been about the status it brings to them, i doubt the consumer cares or has cared at all about the artistic vision when buying the product.
@sindisiwemajola1108
@sindisiwemajola1108 Жыл бұрын
You are doing great! Thank you, lad. I once a high-end fashion goer, but since '16, I was just hitting rock bottom in being nostalgic to inventors and Avant-garde innovators I once read about in my early childhood times. But anyway, thank you. Let's talk more
@wilfredmarrero891
@wilfredmarrero891 8 ай бұрын
I can spend the whole day watching your material. been a fashion designer since age 11. been a fashion designer en miami for the last 18, you have great point and I agree in most of you opinion. I eat fashion like my bday cake... thanks again.
@a916LEX
@a916LEX Жыл бұрын
Very sad times we are living in.:(
@redfullmoon
@redfullmoon Жыл бұрын
Asset management and funder/investor holding companies have ruined a lot of brands and products. The incentives of investors to extract as much profit as possible means skill and quality of work goes down. A lot of the luxury products out in the market are basically overhyped because of the name's legacy but are now of lower quality.
@SlidinAway
@SlidinAway Жыл бұрын
Thanks for a good well thought out video, and for giving me another way of looking at fashion👍
@pri.sci.lla.
@pri.sci.lla. Жыл бұрын
Since everything happened with Elon musk and twitter, Bernard is now the richest person in the world
@leguan1
@leguan1 Жыл бұрын
1:46 Fashion maps
@IrishAnnie
@IrishAnnie Жыл бұрын
It’s not about fashion anymore. It’s about being the wildest, most dismal looks ever. Apocalypse. They look like costumes from the movie DUNE.
@jaydasilva_
@jaydasilva_ Жыл бұрын
Arnault doesn't need to buy it if the owners owners of these brands decide not to sell it to him.
@jakecavendish3470
@jakecavendish3470 Жыл бұрын
I met him on a beach in Spain once. He was carrying a suitcase of socks, sunglasses etc and kept trying to sell me them. Got to admire the hustle even if he was annoying
@miguelpadilla5582
@miguelpadilla5582 Жыл бұрын
Been waiting for this one for a while
@Dennis0824
@Dennis0824 Жыл бұрын
The hunt for profit in the fashion industry will ultimately be its undoing. You are correct; prices are increasing while quality is declining. The luxury brands are no longer providing the value that their prices dictate. As this trend continues, the influence of the luxury brands will decline and many of them will eventually cease to exist. The good news is that decline will create the space for new and innovative designers which will create a number of niche markets instead of the big conglomerates we see today.
@yotube1ful
@yotube1ful Жыл бұрын
Dude! You’re one hell of a smart dude. I sincerely believe you can be or do whatever you want. You have the smarts. I don’t know how talented a designer you are or could be but from this vantage point journalism would be well served by your talents. You’re convincing in your argumentation. Authoritative without seeming cocky or overly opinionated. Well researched but deliver with a sense of conviction buoyed by a deep grasp of the subject matter. Your narrative had the ring of “truth.” Whilst I underhand that the matter is highly subjective, it nevertheless came across as something you deeply believe and thus came across as truthful. Genuine. Success with whatever you do in the end. You’ll be great at it. This I believe.
@lme4339
@lme4339 Жыл бұрын
15:28 I completely left fashion industry for several reasons, but exploitation and lack of creativity and meaning are some of them. Now, I work in the tech industry and work with companies which have products which have a positive impact on the world in my opinion like an app helping MS patients. I am so much more happier, but sometimes, I miss fashion.
@olivegrove2615
@olivegrove2615 Жыл бұрын
R.M.Williams is no longer owned by LVMH. He's likely to have sold of other brands as well.
@acearch5ive
@acearch5ive Жыл бұрын
Excellent reporting. You have really done your home work and for the most part I would agree that conglomerates and their marketing strategies have dulled the edge of the fashion . I would like to point out one more thing that I think has added to Fashion's demise, well, two or three things: With the advent of the internet, fashion magazine's are quickly becoming obsolete and with it so has the printed page. Those beautifully designed pages and their layout, have become mediocre to what they were once. We have been collecting fashion magazines from the 1930s on and the art inside, the photography, the styling and the art direction were almost always noteworthy and most importantly fed our dreams. Another phenomenon that has taken over our society in the last 30 years is our obsession with Celebrity Culture. Anna Winter among many others has dedicated her magazines to celebrities. Well, for the most part celebrities simply are not all that interesting and their taste and style even less so. Designers, except a few, really are not concerned about creating a message that resonates for the next season. They are not interested in inventing a new approach to style and allure. They dedicate themselves to Product and then hope that some stylist will have the talent to put the pieces together so that it all looks like something new. But they rarely do so I guess "Stylists" are also partially to blame. Our whole culture suffers from internet fatigue and mediocrity. Its not just Bernard Arnault although he personifies the machine that has changed the business of fashion.
@frankiefurbag9030
@frankiefurbag9030 Жыл бұрын
He isnt the only one. The little old lady a vogue will not let anyone move forward. Just sits on her perch and no one can move up.
@tmcblastyoutuber2869
@tmcblastyoutuber2869 Жыл бұрын
I can definitely tell you that I plan on buying the Kering group to bait Arnault in which I want to merge with lvmh into lvmh kering in which I have 51% stake in the company.
@silviacarolinalangowski8442
@silviacarolinalangowski8442 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, because I completely agree with you! The only luxury brand I will be investing in will be Hermes because of the quality and tradition of how they manufacture their products.
@panachejp
@panachejp Жыл бұрын
yo wheres your jumper from? also nice gaudi poster
How Fashion Needs to Change To Get Better
20:54
Fashionlover4
Рет қаралды 47 М.
How Marc Jacobs Ruined Heaven
15:43
Fashionlover4
Рет қаралды 183 М.
Spongebob ate Michael Jackson 😱 #meme #spongebob #gmod
00:14
Mr. LoLo
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
when you have plan B 😂
00:11
Andrey Grechka
Рет қаралды 66 МЛН
Do you choose Inside Out 2 or The Amazing World of Gumball? 🤔
00:19
Как подписать? 😂 #shorts
00:10
Денис Кукояка
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Is The Luxury Goods Bubble About to Burst?
20:24
Patrick Boyle
Рет қаралды 973 М.
Balenciaga Got What It Asked For
19:44
Fashionlover4
Рет қаралды 58 М.
Why Fashion Needs Peter Do
16:02
Fashionlover4
Рет қаралды 194 М.
Why Pharrell is the Perfect Choice For Louis Vuitton
10:57
Fashionlover4
Рет қаралды 67 М.
The Problem(s) With Heliot Emil
23:07
Fashionlover4
Рет қаралды 65 М.
Prada: Fascism and Fashion
25:05
Bliss Foster
Рет қаралды 244 М.
How TikTok & The Pandemic Changed Fashion
14:04
Fashionlover4
Рет қаралды 43 М.
How Glenn Martens Saved Diesel & Y Project
19:35
Fashionlover4
Рет қаралды 71 М.
Why Rich People (sorta) Don't Wear Luxury
17:55
ALEXANDER
Рет қаралды 2,2 МЛН
How Louis Vuitton Got Humiliated Trying To Acquire Gucci
16:50
Logically Answered
Рет қаралды 299 М.
Spongebob ate Michael Jackson 😱 #meme #spongebob #gmod
00:14
Mr. LoLo
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН