How Can We Achieve Unity When You Curse The Companions!? || Sheikh Ahmed Salman

[@gazzy2012ga]

MashAllah ...Smashed it!!!

[@AbdulWahid-yc7pt]

Very logical approach of Shiekh Salman.

[@TouizniStore]

Good continuation🌹

[@clementeen]

Owned

[@RyuFan1999]

More videos from the Shaykh, such an articulated answer MashaAllah

[@siartje]

What was funny is the interviewer accused the Shia for oppressing the Sunnis when they had the power, when the scholar responded he said, "why not keep these issues in the past? "

[@SalimSalhab-s3k]

Top top video

[@harris.est.13]

Well, you can read Safavid history for the Sunni-Shia 'tolerance'

[@swishcheez6021]

i condemn any killing or persecution of innocents that the safavid empire carried out but you do realise there has been mass slaughters of shias by different sunni empires and countries in the past right

[@MohsenHeydarbaki]

پس کو زیرنویس فارسی

[@Sostrong2000]

fitna 😂 hahahahahaha

[@Shazayum]

The whole delusion of this Imam is that he cannot seem to accept that a family member of a prophet could be sent to Jahannam. Where it is clearly the case for many Prophets, Ibrahim and Nuh and Lut to name a few.

[@Shazayum]

Also, Sunnis say Abu Taleb was a kafir because we have reports. There are no reports that he accepted Islam. Umar and Abu Bakr accepted Islam however Shias declare them to be kuffar because of their negative perception, not because there are evidence of them renouncing Islam.

[@Akhbari-14125]

@@Shazayum Their actions are sufficient to say that they were hypocrites who under the mask of muslim changed religion and got power and ruled over muslims. Also they didnt let the people know who were the true successors of prophet and sidelined them.

[@noobsaibot203]

Why don’t you accept then that a wife of a prophet will also go to hell, possibly Aisha or Hafsa, when in the Qur’aan it mentions it explicitly in chapter 66 and was also referencing Aisha and Hafsa in the same Surah?

[@mowhuss2525]

There is evidence that Abu Talib did accept Islam. One of which is the poetry of Abu Talib. Look it up.

[@wakkashussain5338]

​@MuhammadYousuf-pl9on so why did Hazrat Ali name his later children the names of Abu Bakr, Uthman and Umar? Why did Ali (the lion of Allah) not question who the next caliph will be if he was supposed to be and wasnt? Also the only reason why Sunnis have a problem with shia is because they stand there and swear openly at the prophets companions. Sunnis will never accept such insults, so no we can never tolerate the shit that the shites talk.

[@bunooralbahraini2987]

Although it may be well intended, this video again demonstrates Ahmed Salman’s delusion. The example he gives about Abu Talib can only be called silly. We do not have ritualised cursing of Abu Talib. He is respected. Similarly the Muslims have no issue living with say Christians or Jews who believe all our revered figures including the Prophet ﷺ himself are in hell. But their religion does not revolve around cursing, attacking and lying about our figures the way you yourself Hassan have demonstrated. The reality of the situation is you the Twelvers claim Islam yet attack the revered figures of the majority of Muslims, provoking over a billion people. Your religion is obsessed with the sahaba. And who would accept the statement, “I curse your mother ritually but only when you are not around”? The reality is that Twelver Shiism is extremely provocative and is incompatible with humanity (at least the Muslim part), no matter how nice you make it sound or how eloquent your speakers are.

[@nooraldeenaldrees492]

Abu Taleb Peace Be Upon him is RESPECTED? You have a misconception on how to define respect then. You are saying that you believing that Abu Taleb is Kafer is respectful ? it means that he is in hell; he is bad; the person that died protecting the foundation of Islam in his lands. When Abu taleb was protecting the prophet and Islam, Omar may Allah sends his curses on him, on the other hand was busy torturing Muslim. There is no problem in cursing Omar, abu baker, Othman. You just have to believe in the plurality of believe and religion. Omar must not have any immunity, or so does any historical figure. The provoking is what is so called sunni mind hypocrisy. You are saying just because speaking my opinion as Shia about Abu baker and Omar, I become incompatible with humanity??? this is so absured. why don't you say also about the Quran also is incompatible with humanity because it spoke about Aisha and Hafsa in Al Tahreem., and spoke about Zulaikha when she tried to seduce prophet Joseph, and wife of Noah and Lot. This is called history and there should not be animosity in reading history differently. This is what the majority of what is so called Sunnis would refuse to accept, the Plurality of thought.

[@azimjozi7931]

That's why we call your figures idols of Quraysh. We curse them for political reasons not just religious.

[@ibrahimvazirabad1486]

@@nooraldeenaldrees492 Zulaikha tried to seduce Nabi Yusuf, not Aisha

[@Sayeda_zahra110]

@@ibrahimvazirabad1486 Zulekha (sa) Seduced prophet Yusuf (as) due to her ignorance and later she(sa) repented. Whereas Aisha binte Abu bakr (may Allah swt give them both what they deserve thats hell fire) accused , ill treated, forged lies against Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him & his progeny), aisha (may Allah curse her) oppressed the other wives of Prophet (saw) all well these are historical facts. Now where has aisha repented ? Can you provide evidence where she repented? Neither can you prove her innocent from the above state facts.

[@nooraldeenaldrees492]

@@ibrahimvazirabad1486 whats your point Mr.? Can you correlate your point?