i could have told you without 20 years of experience that birds are the animals that strike plains the most, and not dogs, sharks or even elephants
@BroAnarchy2 жыл бұрын
Man, i was going to say... Sharks would be way up there for me. Especially those Sharknados.
@KGisthename2 жыл бұрын
@@BroAnarchy Naive sharks?
@connorawalsh2 жыл бұрын
I mean she did a thorough explanation from start to finish. I learned a lot!
@danh67202 жыл бұрын
It’s a somewhat silly statistic if it’s not presented along with the fact that numbers of strikes are important but have to be weighed against consequences. For example, deer are rarely struck, but it’s a much bigger problem when they are. Basically a small part of the instruction that doesn’t make sense without the rest.
@BroAnarchy2 жыл бұрын
Man getting _paid_ to *_drive around_* honking at birds to leave an airport sounds like my dream job! 🤩🤩🤩
@leo_nidas2 жыл бұрын
These are great details! Thanks for the report. Very informative.
@megha66912 жыл бұрын
Wsj .. thy always come up something more informative. Totally love watching these videos.
@regolith13502 жыл бұрын
“Birds are the wildlife group most frequently struck by aircraft” Well obviously. Birds fly. Planes fly. They’re gonna collide. There isn’t gonna be an epidemic of planes hitting deer or dolphins, is there? Who writes this stuff? This is like saying “food is most commonly eaten during meals”.
@delia_watercolors2 жыл бұрын
If you start thinking like this, you will notice it in every piece of newsmedia and otherwise, available on television, Internet and radio. It is unavoidable.
@BroAnarchy2 жыл бұрын
Lol 🤷♂️
@danh67202 жыл бұрын
There is an epidemic of planes hitting deer in some locations. It’s not as frequent, but hitting deer is a bigger problem per collision.
@khamiskhatib-z9t3 ай бұрын
I am happy to know this channel will help me because i am also an employee of the wildlife department at Abeid Aman Karume International Airport Zanzibar Tanzania
@ReynaSingh2 жыл бұрын
4:03 poor possum
@heidichu98632 жыл бұрын
Wow such a cool topic - I knew nothing about this! Amazing work :)
@sly2732 жыл бұрын
what a informative video, good job wsj.
@scotterickson37302 жыл бұрын
But birds aren’t real
@kevinjenner95022 жыл бұрын
In Japan they fire blank cartridges, set off fireworks and a whole host of similar actions.
@manifold14762 жыл бұрын
Q: How Do Airports Keep Birds From Striking Planes? A: They Don't.
@RobsonFilho2 жыл бұрын
How to mitigate it, *clock kok*
@Alorio-Gori2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for all these Hard Work 💪
@alparslankorkmaz29642 жыл бұрын
Nice video.
@TobiasDuncan2 жыл бұрын
"Aircrafts"
@MeowfaceMusic Жыл бұрын
How about amplifying particular frequencies to deter birds from hanging around?
@fredricknolan39052 жыл бұрын
Remember Shellyburg at JFK.
@jamescallaway737611 ай бұрын
Very rarely do birds strike aircraft, they don't intentionally fly into aircraft! Its the aircraft that tends to strike the birds as they can't out pace or out manoeuvre aircraft due to the speed. Some species such as birds of prey have been known however to attack slow flying light aircraft, microlights hang gliders when they enter their territory to defend it.
@tonysteve58552 жыл бұрын
i have a question
@tonysteve58552 жыл бұрын
waht does mean to have a turbo engine jet aircraft
@bbt3052 жыл бұрын
They just mean a jet engine versus a propeller.
@auro19862 жыл бұрын
how?cutting trees to make airports and runways and birds don't have place to nest
@oquendo00212 жыл бұрын
Omg like that one video where the plane is landing and it runs over a deer and gets stuck on the tire
There's no such word as "aircrafts", it's a singular plural like rice or pasta. You can have one or a hundred aircraft, but not a hundred aircrafts.
@danielm89502 жыл бұрын
I beeped at a bird once too. It was in the road.
@karlriina69502 жыл бұрын
more proof. #birdsarentreal
@krishnasingh25202 жыл бұрын
"Sully" fans put your attendance here ✈️✈️🕊️🕊️
@aarononeal98302 жыл бұрын
The Wallstreet journal needs to talk about Ecosia they are a search engine that plants tress.
@kristofferthordarson10402 жыл бұрын
So you’re telling me that Spirit has a lot of wildlife strikes?
@Royalfaction2 жыл бұрын
Those birds are innocent and just trying to find thier way lol. While playing by the rules of course
@daveselbow91282 жыл бұрын
sending 'snarge' samples to a lab for identification? what a waste of money...
@danh67202 жыл бұрын
Except identifying the bird type helps direct prevention measures and reduces the chance a given aircraft is going to have a costly collision.
@Nill7572 жыл бұрын
How bout some foxes
@luisito63145 ай бұрын
Learned nothing here
@juliez96732 жыл бұрын
Okay yeah the birds are cool, BUT WHAT ABOUT THE REST OF BS W/ THE PORT AUTHORITY AIRPORTS
@pedrolplgm2 жыл бұрын
IN SPAIN. ONLY REPORTS. ROBER SR. GOOD. THANKS. THE END.
@SolracNexus2 жыл бұрын
Meanwhile in the middle east: "How do airports keep planes from striking buildings?"
@AGTsakumis2 жыл бұрын
These types of stories by WSJ are a welcome departure from the usual govt screw-up etc. One question: After a bird strike, why keep the carcasses? Who cares? Just toss them and move on. Seems there's too much to this process.
@TheVermilliaFamily2 жыл бұрын
I believe they are kept to be identified, so they can understand which birds are more likely to be hit. It's especially important if they are endangered species.
@AGTsakumis2 жыл бұрын
@@TheVermilliaFamily Great point. I didn't even consider that. Thank you for that information. Be well.
@danh67202 жыл бұрын
It’s a little odd that they’re keeping that many samples for so long. I do this as part of my job, and if the bird is obviously identifiable, I submit the report and dispose of the remains. If I need to send a sample to the Smithsonian for ID, it’s sent the same or next day. So I don’t quite know why they are storing that many. I suspect it’s a procedure specific to Newark, JFK, and LaGuardia.
@teamtryxgg2812 жыл бұрын
The US has the world's most dilapidated airports and China has the world's most futuristic and modern airports: The Beijing Daxing international airport, Qingdao international airport, Chengdu international airport .. to name just a few.
@Nill7572 жыл бұрын
Get rid of EPA. Presto. New airports, quickly, cheaply. Use state enviro laws
@johnl.77542 жыл бұрын
But that means China airport fees are much more expensive then US airport fees even though average income is much lower. I lived there and wondered why it cost more to fly from China.
@United_Wings2 жыл бұрын
they shoot them😯
@speedplays67102 жыл бұрын
Skeet shooting practice
@danh67202 жыл бұрын
Sometimes, but it’s not the most effective or best way to prevent strikes.
@speedplays67102 жыл бұрын
@@danh6720 dump plastic into the water supply
@dennisthomas87552 жыл бұрын
1st view
@PacoOtis2 жыл бұрын
This false observation is so very common. "THEY" are not in our habitat! "WE" are in theirs! This is very similar to our complaining about the wolves in "our" habitat of Yellowstone! This is completely wrong! What a pitiful species we are! Best of luck to all of us!
@mrepix82872 жыл бұрын
No, humans are at the top and we have the right to do as we please. There are plenty of natural areas for birds to fly to, airports are very small in the grand scheme of things
@teamtryxgg2812 жыл бұрын
If Americans and Europeans watch videos of modern airports and thousands of skyscrapers in China, I'm sure they'll get jealous of China to the point of feeling suicidal. I watch tons of drone videos of cities in China every day. A small city in China is bigger and more modern than New York city, America's biggest city.
@thaveenrubenthiran21902 жыл бұрын
really put in the perspective of how many people are suffering in Shanghai.....thank you for your insight
@teamtryxgg2812 жыл бұрын
@@thaveenrubenthiran2190 I agree with you. What's happening in Shanghai is temporary (or transitory as Jerome Powell insisted).