How India Helped Bangladesh Get Independence From Pakistan | History Documentary

[@HikmaHistory]

Do you think the Bengali desire for autonomy could've been achieved without full independence? For Full Modern History Playlist: kzbin.info/aero/PLiPhmAD3I2Jz6goEJlQ1zh6KkbeBWZ2pP

[@leahcim38]

O R I Sea Bang Da Lesh Bang that leash

[@ajzmn3538]

Geographically, the existence of Pakistan as two separate territories divided by hundreds of miles is absurd. No way would this arrangement last, even with the most generous fulfilment of Bengali autonomy.

[@HikmaHistory]

@@ajzmn3538 Good point, but break it down for me - how did the distance affect them practically ?

[@HikmaHistory]

@@ethanmcconkey100 Taking both realism and idealism into account - I like that!

[@nyannero3262]

In 1956(new constitution) and in 1970 both times Bengalis tried to negotiate for autonomy rather than full independence. There was a growing separatist movement as time went on but even Mujib tried to do negotiations right up until 25 March,1971. So ultimately this wasn't possible since West Pakistanis were fearful of losing their influence over East Pakistan as a whole. There are even conspiracies Bhutto actually wanted the East to be gone, since under a pure democracy it would be the East who would have more power every single time.

[@Observer01-qn8eg]

Pakistan just needed resources of Bangladesh and not Bengali people. I even hear Pakistanis say ‘Bangladesh would be a military base for us if we didn’t lose it’ and it pisses me off when I hear them say that shit. Bengal is not yours, and not India’s. Illegal occupiers are always illegal occupiers!

[@abdullahassaffah]

They do make statements like we want the land not people

[@Observer01-qn8eg]

@@abdullahassaffah correct me if I’m wrong but Bengalis in Pakistan are not allowed to have Pakistani passports and they get dumped in slums of Karachi. While Pakistanis in Bangladesh can get Bengali passport, I know some Pakistanis born in Bangladesh Chittagong and they are well looked after, multi lingual and respect us enough to learn our language too just like we already know their and it didn’t need to be forced.

[@JacobNoir]

​@@Observer01-qn8egThey are allowed to have passports. But u should know that Karachi is destroyed, and not only Bengalis live in the slums. This includes other muhajirs.

[@theathiestcrusader]

Sorry, sir. Bengal IS India's territory. We have treated Bengalis with respect. Bengalis are integral to India. Maybe not Pakistan, but definitely, India. Bengali people in India fought for the independence of our country, gave India its national anthem and Bengalis are, for all practical purposes, Indians who clearly understand India as a united entity and know the potential of the country which they do focus on.

[@Ardeshirbae]

​@@theathiestcrusader maybe that's why West Bengal became one of the poorest state while it was the richest even in the British era

[@budgetgaming3093]

Iam a Bengali and a Bangladeshi And I thank our great leaders of the independence struggle and all the heroic freedom fighters who risked their lives to free us from the tyranny of the west Pakistani monsters. Long live Bangladesh Joy Bangla Bangladesh Jindabad

[@pravahsaxena3537]

But Bangladesh 🇧🇩 is becoming like Pakistan 🇵🇰 now.

[@cubicqe]

@@pravahsaxena3537 WE ARE MUCH PROUD OF IT. ALL WE WANT IS IMRAN KHAN ON BOARD. AND WE GOOD TO GO.

[@cubicqe]

@@pravahsaxena3537JOY BANGLA PEOPLE ARE INDIAN ESPIONAGE WORKING WTH RAW SINCE 1971 TILL NOW. AKHAND BHARAT NOT GONNA BE A REALITY SORRY GUYS. POOR INDIRA........MAULANA BHASHANI WAS RIGHT !!

[@MohammadAliAhasan]

Sheikh MUjib is murderer of Million Bengali People. He murdered Millions of people under his rule from 1972-1975

[@Azrael1st]

I am Bangladeshi and I think Pakistanis are our brothers.

[@bigsarge2085]

Thank you for covering this.

[@muazzamshaikh2049]

One peculiar fact is that while the operation searchlight was instigated against the Bangladesh movement as a whole, the Bengali Hindus were specifically targeted. Pakistan's imams declared Bengali Hindu women to be "war booty"; and Pakistani fatwa were issued legitimizing Bengali Hindu women as spoils of war. Women who were targeted often died in Pakistani captivity or committed suicide, while others fled to India.

[@sajO5754]

Total bullshit....the truth is that.... THE THREE MILLION LIE Mujib was puzzled to be addressed as "your excellency" by Mr Panth. He was surprised, almost shocked, when I explained to him that Bangladesh had been liberated and he was elected president in his absence. Apparently he arrived in London under the impression that East Pakistanis had been granted the full regional autonomy for which he had been campaigning. During the day I and others gave him the full picture of the war. I explained that no accurate figure of the casualties was available but our estimate, based on information from various sources, was that up to "three lakh" (300,000) died in the conflict. To my surprise and horror he told David Frost later that "three millions of my people" were killed by the Pakistanis. Whether he mistranslated "lakh" as "million" or his confused state of mind was responsible I don't know, but many Bangladeshis still believe a figure of three million is unrealistic and incredible. Serajur Rahman Retired deputy head, BBC Bengali Service The entire allegation of genocide and the figure of three million is central to the whole argument. I think we should discuss this first in detail and see if you accept or reject this before we move onto the 300'000 killed. This figure of 3 million has been questioned by many others such as the daily New Age editor Nurul Kabir, the New Age special correspondent British journalist David Bergman , Social media activist Dr Mina Farah, and many BNP leaders such as Gayeshwar Chandra Roy, Nazrul Islam Khan, Ruhul Kabir Rizvi, Nilufar Chowdhury Moni and Fahima Nasrin Munni, among others. The question of the story of 3m goes back to Gen Yahya Khan, President of Pakistan (1969-1971), who is said to have wanted to kill that many, according to Robert Payne, author of Massacre: The Tragedy of Bangladesh and the Phenomenon of Mass Slaughter (Macmillan, 1973). Sheikh Mujib’s interview with the then BBC journalist Sir David Frost on 8 January 1972 is where the mix up between 3 lakh (300'000) and 3 million is mentioned. In his excellent 2017 article, “Myth of 3m killed & 200,000 raped in 1971,” Dr Junaid Ahmad contends: “The repeated claims of 3 million killed and the rape of 200,000 Bengali women were stopped after a tripartite agreement between Pakistan, India and Bangladesh in April 1974. During the regimes of General Zia, General Husain, Mohammad Ershad and later Khaleda Zia, the Bangladesh government was more pragmatic and made friendly overtures to Pakistan. However, the present government of Hasina Wajid of Awami League continues to use this exaggerated lie of 3 million killed to hatemonger if not to evoke the baser emotions of its electorate to cultivate support and also to court favors from India. Even basic arithmetic, which seems to be beyond the grasp of the Bangladeshi establishment, shows the unabashed absurdity of the 3 million killed and 200,000 women raped myths. To illustrate, perhaps at the expense of disgusting my readers, the Army action in East Pakistan started on 26 March and lasted till 16th December, 1971 - a total of 262 days. This implies that about 11,450 Bengalis would need to have been picked-up, killed and buried every day. When compared to the 2nd World War for instance, the 6 million Jews killed by Nazi Germany in 6 years comes to only 2,740 killed every day - markedly less. Both the figures of the daily killings are fantastically preposterous and defy common sense.” Upon his return to the newly independent Bangladesh, Sheikh Mujib reportedly ordered a 12-member committee, on January 29, 1972, to find out the exact number of the dead. After nearly completing the work two years later, the commission came up with a number in the neighborhood of 58,000 to 65,000. The commission’s work, however, did not proceed for reasons unknown and mysterious. According to Zoglul Husain of the UK, “Around 1972-73, the Bangladesh Red Cross Secretary (of which Gazi Golam Mostafa was Chairman) was given the assignment by Mujib to study the number of death in 1971. After about 9 months of study, when three-quarters of Bangladesh was covered, they found about 60,000 dead. Mujib then asked them to stop counting and destroy the papers, and they did it accordingly. Since then, no survey was done.” Former KGB agent Yuri Bezmenov explains how the Bangladesh war was engineered by India and Russia kzbin.info/www/bejne/a3rXYq2Xp66BrJIsi=M5eh-1gTC_CMpum- Watch from 1:01:19 If for some reason the links don't work you can Google "Mujib's confusion on Bangladeshi deaths" and you should come to a load of websites and articles on the issue. www.eurasiareview.com/05022020-bangladeshs-war-dead-the-controversy-of-3-lakh-300000-versus-30-lakh-3000000-3m-liberation-war-martyrs-oped/ www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead//article59782867.ece www.theguardian.com/world/2011/may/24/mujib-confusion-on-bangladeshi-deaths medium.com/@ancientpakistan/debunking-the-myths-of-1971-bangladesh-bd0f2829377d

[@tmdimplementer]

No !!! Razakars and Pakistani Army targeted all Bengali Women that time be it Muslims, Hindus, Atheists, Secular, Poor, Rich or Tribals. There are documented Records of Rape and Captivity of 3 million Bangladeshi Women and illegitimate 1 million Rape borne babies.

[@saadsalman6641]

@@muazzamshaikh2049when you don't find the proof of the alleged rape victims, this is the best way to support your claim by fabricating the stories that either they died in captivity or committed suicide or fled to india.

[@lotcam4046]

​​@@saadsalman6641 cope

[@muazzamshaikh2049]

@@saadsalman6641 when people can't accept the fact that Pakistan Army is a bunch of cowards who can only attack women, they post such comments.

[@saadsalman6641]

93000 were not soldiers. Soldiers were 28000; remaining were officers and staffs in civil services

[@sajO5754]

THE THREE MILLION LIE Mujib was puzzled to be addressed as "your excellency" by Mr Panth. He was surprised, almost shocked, when I explained to him that Bangladesh had been liberated and he was elected president in his absence. Apparently he arrived in London under the impression that East Pakistanis had been granted the full regional autonomy for which he had been campaigning. During the day I and others gave him the full picture of the war. I explained that no accurate figure of the casualties was available but our estimate, based on information from various sources, was that up to "three lakh" (300,000) died in the conflict. To my surprise and horror he told David Frost later that "three millions of my people" were killed by the Pakistanis. Whether he mistranslated "lakh" as "million" or his confused state of mind was responsible I don't know, but many Bangladeshis still believe a figure of three million is unrealistic and incredible. Serajur Rahman Retired deputy head, BBC Bengali Service The entire allegation of genocide and the figure of three million is central to the whole argument. I think we should discuss this first in detail and see if you accept or reject this before we move onto the 300'000 killed. This figure of 3 million has been questioned by many others such as the daily New Age editor Nurul Kabir, the New Age special correspondent British journalist David Bergman , Social media activist Dr Mina Farah, and many BNP leaders such as Gayeshwar Chandra Roy, Nazrul Islam Khan, Ruhul Kabir Rizvi, Nilufar Chowdhury Moni and Fahima Nasrin Munni, among others. The question of the story of 3m goes back to Gen Yahya Khan, President of Pakistan (1969-1971), who is said to have wanted to kill that many, according to Robert Payne, author of Massacre: The Tragedy of Bangladesh and the Phenomenon of Mass Slaughter (Macmillan, 1973). Sheikh Mujib’s interview with the then BBC journalist Sir David Frost on 8 January 1972 is where the mix up between 3 lakh (300'000) and 3 million is mentioned. In his excellent 2017 article, “Myth of 3m killed & 200,000 raped in 1971,” Dr Junaid Ahmad contends: “The repeated claims of 3 million killed and the rape of 200,000 Bengali women were stopped after a tripartite agreement between Pakistan, India and Bangladesh in April 1974. During the regimes of General Zia, General Husain, Mohammad Ershad and later Khaleda Zia, the Bangladesh government was more pragmatic and made friendly overtures to Pakistan. However, the present government of Hasina Wajid of Awami League continues to use this exaggerated lie of 3 million killed to hatemonger if not to evoke the baser emotions of its electorate to cultivate support and also to court favors from India. Even basic arithmetic, which seems to be beyond the grasp of the Bangladeshi establishment, shows the unabashed absurdity of the 3 million killed and 200,000 women raped myths. To illustrate, perhaps at the expense of disgusting my readers, the Army action in East Pakistan started on 26 March and lasted till 16th December, 1971 - a total of 262 days. This implies that about 11,450 Bengalis would need to have been picked-up, killed and buried every day. When compared to the 2nd World War for instance, the 6 million Jews killed by Nazi Germany in 6 years comes to only 2,740 killed every day - markedly less. Both the figures of the daily killings are fantastically preposterous and defy common sense.” Upon his return to the newly independent Bangladesh, Sheikh Mujib reportedly ordered a 12-member committee, on January 29, 1972, to find out the exact number of the dead. After nearly completing the work two years later, the commission came up with a number in the neighborhood of 58,000 to 65,000. The commission’s work, however, did not proceed for reasons unknown and mysterious. According to Zoglul Husain of the UK, “Around 1972-73, the Bangladesh Red Cross Secretary (of which Gazi Golam Mostafa was Chairman) was given the assignment by Mujib to study the number of death in 1971. After about 9 months of study, when three-quarters of Bangladesh was covered, they found about 60,000 dead. Mujib then asked them to stop counting and destroy the papers, and they did it accordingly. Since then, no survey was done.” Former KGB agent Yuri Bezmenov explains how the Bangladesh war was engineered by India and Russia kzbin.info/www/bejne/a3rXYq2Xp66BrJIsi=M5eh-1gTC_CMpum- Watch from 1:01:19 If for some reason the links don't work you can Google "Mujib's confusion on Bangladeshi deaths" and you should come to a load of websites and articles on the issue. www.eurasiareview.com/05022020-bangladeshs-war-dead-the-controversy-of-3-lakh-300000-versus-30-lakh-3000000-3m-liberation-war-martyrs-oped/ www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead//article59782867.ece www.theguardian.com/world/2011/may/24/mujib-confusion-on-bangladeshi-deaths medium.com/@ancientpakistan/debunking-the-myths-of-1971-bangladesh-bd0f2829377d

[@soloist7880]

well it was around 36000

[@rickfresher]

Lol how much was it during black September 🤡🤡🤡🤡​@@soloist7880

[@r.b6170]

The figure varies; I've heard it said the an estimated 35,000/40,000 were soldiers; 93,000 was the figure for the total number of captives, soldier, civil servants and their families, etc, ....

[@muj970]

Keep lying 😂

[@rid71k]

Thank you for covering my county's history

[@t.r.s.eakamuneebatif9173]

Oh dang, this is a FRESH comment section lol. Before the arguments start, how is everyone today?

[@crazychicken8290]

good

[@leahcim38]

My Neck Is Sore.. And Maria my ears too.

[@alexhubble]

Great thanks! I'm only here for the videos...

[@chairmanmeow7297]

Just got discharged from the hospital. Drugged up. 🥴 hurting

[@t.r.s.eakamuneebatif9173]

@@chairmanmeow7297 Hope you feel better dude. Must've been painful

[@dhavaldesai6202]

You forgot the raps of Bengali women and how Pakistan wanted to change the race of bengal by this raps specifically hindus were targeted more

[@sajO5754]

Total Indian bullshit 😅

[@tmdimplementer]

All type of Bengali Women were raped by Pakistani Army and their Razakaar Militias.

[@cubicqe]

NOPE. MUSLIM WOMEN WERE THE MAIN VICTIMS. "BIRANGANA" YET MUJIB COULDN'T SAVE THEM FROM THE SOCIETY. MAJORITY OF THEM WERE UNALIVED BY THE HUSBANDS / FAMILY MEMEBERS, BY THEMSELVES OR SIMPLY BECAUSE OF POVERTY & LACK OF FOOD ( BECAUSE THEY GOT KICKED OUT BY THEIR FAMILIES ) . I KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO THERE BUT YOU CAN'T. MOST HINDUS AT THAT TIME COULD EASILY ENTER INDIA, BUT MUSLIMS COULDN'T.

[@SamBroadway]

I am 61 years old. I do my best to learn something new everyday. I am thankful to Hikma History for making it another successful day. I probably only had knowledge of maybe 10% of this information shared... 👍👍 This is a really good channel

[@HikmaHistory]

Very glad to hear that Sam!

[@sajO5754]

Here's something thst most Bengali and Indians don't mention. THE THREE MILLION LIE Mujib was puzzled to be addressed as "your excellency" by Mr Panth. He was surprised, almost shocked, when I explained to him that Bangladesh had been liberated and he was elected president in his absence. Apparently he arrived in London under the impression that East Pakistanis had been granted the full regional autonomy for which he had been campaigning. During the day I and others gave him the full picture of the war. I explained that no accurate figure of the casualties was available but our estimate, based on information from various sources, was that up to "three lakh" (300,000) died in the conflict. To my surprise and horror he told David Frost later that "three millions of my people" were killed by the Pakistanis. Whether he mistranslated "lakh" as "million" or his confused state of mind was responsible I don't know, but many Bangladeshis still believe a figure of three million is unrealistic and incredible. Serajur Rahman Retired deputy head, BBC Bengali Service The entire allegation of genocide and the figure of three million is central to the whole argument. I think we should discuss this first in detail and see if you accept or reject this before we move onto the 300'000 killed. This figure of 3 million has been questioned by many others such as the daily New Age editor Nurul Kabir, the New Age special correspondent British journalist David Bergman , Social media activist Dr Mina Farah, and many BNP leaders such as Gayeshwar Chandra Roy, Nazrul Islam Khan, Ruhul Kabir Rizvi, Nilufar Chowdhury Moni and Fahima Nasrin Munni, among others. The question of the story of 3m goes back to Gen Yahya Khan, President of Pakistan (1969-1971), who is said to have wanted to kill that many, according to Robert Payne, author of Massacre: The Tragedy of Bangladesh and the Phenomenon of Mass Slaughter (Macmillan, 1973). Sheikh Mujib’s interview with the then BBC journalist Sir David Frost on 8 January 1972 is where the mix up between 3 lakh (300'000) and 3 million is mentioned. In his excellent 2017 article, “Myth of 3m killed & 200,000 raped in 1971,” Dr Junaid Ahmad contends: “The repeated claims of 3 million killed and the rape of 200,000 Bengali women were stopped after a tripartite agreement between Pakistan, India and Bangladesh in April 1974. During the regimes of General Zia, General Husain, Mohammad Ershad and later Khaleda Zia, the Bangladesh government was more pragmatic and made friendly overtures to Pakistan. However, the present government of Hasina Wajid of Awami League continues to use this exaggerated lie of 3 million killed to hatemonger if not to evoke the baser emotions of its electorate to cultivate support and also to court favors from India. Even basic arithmetic, which seems to be beyond the grasp of the Bangladeshi establishment, shows the unabashed absurdity of the 3 million killed and 200,000 women raped myths. To illustrate, perhaps at the expense of disgusting my readers, the Army action in East Pakistan started on 26 March and lasted till 16th December, 1971 - a total of 262 days. This implies that about 11,450 Bengalis would need to have been picked-up, killed and buried every day. When compared to the 2nd World War for instance, the 6 million Jews killed by Nazi Germany in 6 years comes to only 2,740 killed every day - markedly less. Both the figures of the daily killings are fantastically preposterous and defy common sense.” Upon his return to the newly independent Bangladesh, Sheikh Mujib reportedly ordered a 12-member committee, on January 29, 1972, to find out the exact number of the dead. After nearly completing the work two years later, the commission came up with a number in the neighborhood of 58,000 to 65,000. The commission’s work, however, did not proceed for reasons unknown and mysterious. According to Zoglul Husain of the UK, “Around 1972-73, the Bangladesh Red Cross Secretary (of which Gazi Golam Mostafa was Chairman) was given the assignment by Mujib to study the number of death in 1971. After about 9 months of study, when three-quarters of Bangladesh was covered, they found about 60,000 dead. Mujib then asked them to stop counting and destroy the papers, and they did it accordingly. Since then, no survey was done.” Former KGB agent Yuri Bezmenov explains how the Bangladesh war was engineered by India and Russia kzbin.info/www/bejne/a3rXYq2Xp66BrJIsi=M5eh-1gTC_CMpum- Watch from 1:01:19 If for some reason the links don't work you can Google "Mujib's confusion on Bangladeshi deaths" and you should come to a load of websites and articles on the issue. www.eurasiareview.com/05022020-bangladeshs-war-dead-the-controversy-of-3-lakh-300000-versus-30-lakh-3000000-3m-liberation-war-martyrs-oped/ www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead//article59782867.ece www.theguardian.com/world/2011/may/24/mujib-confusion-on-bangladeshi-deaths medium.com/@ancientpakistan/debunking-the-myths-of-1971-bangladesh-bd0f2829377d

[@theathiestcrusader]

Furthermore, Bengalis were mostly not recruited by the Pakistani army to form the razakars. The Bengalis with an Islamist background were recruited but most of the Razakars were non-Bengalis, particularly the Biharis of East Pakistan.

[@afrozairin8438]

Many Islamist Bangalis were Razakars

[@smallcube-zn2mm]

@@afrozairin8438 search photos of razakars and you'll rarely see any Islamists among them

[@ruggedindividual708]

About time you covered Bangladesh! Where are all my Bengalis!!!

[@HikmaHistory]

Couldn't agree more!

[@cubicqe]

@@HikmaHistory 😂TRY TO COVER THE REAL HISTORY OF BANGALDESH & WHAT'S GOING ON NOW IN BANGLADESH LET'S SEE HOW YOU DO THAT 🤣

[@Hi5Ripon]

Bengalis joining Pakistan in 1947 was the final nail to the coffin after centuries of humiliation

[@Observer01-qn8eg]

We didn’t join Pakistan, we had no voting rights. Our language was being banned along with our script and though we were happy to speak Urdu and Hindi too, Urdu was being forced on everyone. People who even spoke bangla were killed by Pakistan. That’s what caused the uprising. I don’t know why Pakistanis deny their US backed genocide against Bengalis even today, but it happened. They marched through schools, colleges and universities massacring people, then blaming India.

[@Type_I_9]

​@@Observer01-qn8egYeah, tell that to your countryman

[@saadsalman6641]

@@Observer01-qn8eg Bengali was official language in Pakistan. Did any party asked for language rights in 1971 election? you have to fabricate history to provide justification once you get separated

[@Observer01-qn8eg]

@@saadsalman6641 look up Bengali language movement, it is what made Pakistan recognise it as an official language. I didn’t fabricate anything, son! Pakistanis do, every time. Bengali uprising is what demanded the Bengali independence. 😂

[@Observer01-qn8eg]

@@saadsalman6641 did I also fabricate a story about Pakistans mass genocide of Bengalis??

[@Crabby303]

Great stuff, succinct but accurate coverage of this momentous piece of history. Nice work!

[@HikmaHistory]

Much appreciated!

[@EnderGrad]

Imo, I think you should alter the title slightly. People can get real heated when it comes to that topic, because people automatically assume it invalidates all sacrifices made by Bangladeshis

[@muhammadalimalik337]

Slight correction on 3:05. Pakistani government was dominated by the pashtuns at that time with dictator Ayub Khana and subsequent Yahya khan both belonging to that ethnicity. Currently however the nation is Punjabi dominated

[@HikmaHistory]

Yes both leaders were Pashtun but the majority of the administration and civil bureaucracy were Punjabis. Of course the leader is the most important (especially when they are a dictator like Ayub) but they can't do their job without lower and mid-level admins.

[@dante666jt]

"let's make a province in the eastern part of India separated miles apart, with newly formed muslim territory. What could go wrong?" ~ Jinnah (probably)

[@tafheemyeasir1606]

Bengali Muslims played a large part in the creation of Pakistan

[@smallcube-zn2mm]

@@tafheemyeasir1606 well Bengali Muslims didn't have any better way , Bengali Muslims first proposed United Bengal but "calcutta dadababus" rejected that If they proposed independent BD in 1947 then BD would face the fate of hydrabad , So they had to join Pakistan as the only option

[@EnderGrad]

Bangladeshi here. Overall, one of the best videos regarding the Liberation War. I've come across many videos about that conflict. Most of them were, unfortunately, very lopsided. A lot of them even missed the reasons as to why the Bangladeshis were so disillusioned with that time's politics. If any one of my foreign friends wants to know a summary about the war, I will refer them to this video.

[@HikmaHistory]

Thank you for your feedback and kind words! With conflicts, I find that the causes or context is almost more important than the actual conflict itself - hence why I dedicate substantially more time to the context than the actual war.

[@McVaySwifty]

An under-covered country, nice work!

[@HikmaHistory]

My brother!

[@jeremyhodge6216]

This explains everything that I always wanted to know about the relationship of these two countries 🤔

[@orkuokhan6171]

Total support and love to India. Still stop playing with us with the barrage in the Gange.

[@MBasu-km8by]

Apologies for that. India has often treated Bangladesh unfairly, that is very true.

[@thelunatiK]

What barrage

[@travis8895]

Wow India is awesome

[@travis8895]

Bangladesh too

[@isaacfoster2820]

I've been waiting for this a long time

[@HikmaHistory]

Hope it didn't disappoint

[@AAS-cm7bb]

​@@HikmaHistoryChange the title man😢

[@r.b6170]

Between 1947 and 1971 Pakistan did have 4 prime ministers and one president of Bengali ethnicity-east Pakistani origin. However, the fact that the office of Prime Minister in Pakistan amounts to very little is a separate point.

[@in_tasin]

All Bengalis united for their freedom under the leadership of the greatest poet of politics, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, and his ideology and values can never be erased, no matter how hard they try.

[@ghazanfaryaq6776]

All the major players of 1971 suffered a terrible ending, and so did their kids.

[@tafheemyeasir1606]

If you look back in history, some of the main problems the protestors had during the language movement were government jobs and representation. The Chhatra Union and others who fought cultural preservation and bengali nationalism were only fringe parts of the movement who later came to power in Bangladesh and their participation was amplified

[@in_tasin]

Thank you for highlighting the true history of Bangladesh despite the global conspiracy to defame the "Poet of Politics," Bangabandhu, and to rewrite history.

[@Khalistan999]

Another great video

[@CARL_093]

Thanks hikma history

[@WoodsLesnik]

Do current Muslim Bangladeshis have any grievances towards Hindu Bangladeshis? Superb video.

[@YakrifZee]

Bangladeshi Muslims believe hindus are over represented in the positions of power. They are also accused of being the foot soldiers of the BJP-RSS led hindutva regime.

[@tafheemyeasir1606]

Hindu Bangladeshis are overrepresented in Academia and government jobs and this fact is used to justify anti-hindu attacks

[@abdullahassaffah]

Because of that We ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the land - it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind) The Prophet ﷺ mentions in a clear Hadith, ” أكْبَرُ الكَبَائِرِ: الإِشْرَاكُ بِاللَّهِ، وَقَتْلُ النَّفْسِ، وَعُقُوقُ الوَالِدَيْنِ، وَقَوْلُ الزُّورِ، - أَوْ قَالَ: وَشَهَادَةُ الزُّورِ” (Translation: the greatest of sins are: associating partners with Allah, killing an innocent soul, disobeying the parents and to lie/give a false testimony.) These verses from the Qur-an and Hadith are clear and transparent in expressing the severity of killing an innocent person. To oppose these Ayaat and Ahadith is a clear misinterpretation and misunderstanding of the Qur-an and Hadith.

[@Khalistan999]

Hikma can I do a video on humyuns exile in Iran and how he regained his thrown thank you

[@londonbudgetgardner5205]

Excellent video Untold story For over a hundred years, the Bengal Muslims fought for independence from British Raj. Other minority Muslim population in India could not achieve this for example, Kashmir, Gujarat or Hyderabad Muslims. Yet immediately, the East Bengal was handed to a cunning Punjabi overlords. Now the Bengal Muslims have a second hurdle, which they handled cunningly. 95%, of the fighting of the 71 war was done by Bengal fighters. But because the Pakistan Army (in the East) surrendered to the few Indian pioneer brigade, it gave the impression, that India 🇮🇳 defeated Pakistan 🇵🇰, which is false. Since independence, India 🇮🇳 has been a neighbour in ‘bad faith’, always trying to sabotage the process of Bangladesh 🇧🇩.

[@23uncbball]

Wish the best for bangladesh 🇧🇩

[@AshikJonathan]

Bangladeshis don't want the best it seems

[@smallcube-zn2mm]

@@AshikJonathan Bangladesh's neighbor don't want good for Bangladesh , Deshis themselves know what's good for them

[@bloodxdevilldurjoy6718]

@@smallcube-zn2mm this why India gived electricity and food too Bangladesh.

[@smallcube-zn2mm]

@@bloodxdevilldurjoy6718 ahh yes "gived" you people donated us while lacking money to build toilet? all the sweepers and cleaners in my area are from India

[@bloodxdevilldurjoy6718]

@@smallcube-zn2mm listen Delhi has some toilet issue but you can't judge hole India for Delhis condition. And tell me why lodsheding started when India stopped giving electricity too Bangladesh

[@onikkobe]

Thanks for making a video about my home country Bangladesh 🇧🇩 🐅 excited to see what the interim government can do. Inshallah we can be successful 🙏

[@stormshadow5283]

India should barge in through Bangladeah and strive to create a zone around Bangladesh's border region that is autonomous for the Hindu people of Bangladesh and other Hindu Bengalis that fled to different states of India during Partition. India should also impose an air, sea, road and rail blockade thus, denying any supplies to the kanglus out sufficiently enough so that they unalive themselves due to lack of food and other basic supplies before further encroaching and decolonising more areas of "Bangladesh" from them and then giving it to Bengali Hindus. Other parts of Bangladesh like the Chittagong hill tract areas should be made independent and given to the native Chakma Hindu-Buddhist peoples while the area bordering Tropura should be re-incorporated into Tripura state creating "Greater Tripura". That is how you deal with this ilk. There will be so much of empty land in B'desh that Hindu Bengalis who fled during partition to India and present B'deshi Hindus can easily reclaim their lost lands and heritage. Finally, the decolonization of Bengal will be complete.

[@jobedakhan]

​@@stormshadow5283thanks for showing how much of a pile of filth most of the Indians are

[@zohayerhossain55555]

​@@stormshadow5283India is hanging goat head and selling dog meat.People of seven sisters know that.

[@JJDelft]

​@@stormshadow5283That's just colonization but then under Hindus lmao, this can't be serious

[@HikmaHistory]

Thank you man! Am I correct in thinking you're frequently in the Livestream chat with me and Syawish?

[@Ace_Of_Bace]

Congratulations, Brother, for doing such an amazing job for such a long time!

[@HikmaHistory]

Thank you very much bro!

[@sammoh6746]

Granddad fought in navy for this 🤍

[@sohamdhoptey1466]

Most killed in East Bangladesh were communists, intellectuals and Hindus. There was also racial hatred for the Bengalis. This racial hatred for exacerbated due to them not being a martial race.

[@mohammadsaqib622]

Please make a video of Bengal Sultanate and Subah e Bengal

[@PMMagro]

Ethnical creation states like Pakistan and Lebanon have built in serious issues.

[@Nothingchangedmuch]

Moral of the story : Never indulge into politics with extremists

[@onishomar489]

The tragedy of Muslims in India

[@TeddyBelcher4kultrawide]

I’m khan now

[@platinumofthesouth9557]

Sheikh mujib was selfish and also his clan. He didn't declare war nor independence. It was Ziaur Rahman who declared war and independence. But the Awami league that is of his daughter and his previous party changed history.

[@pravahsaxena3537]

He was instrumental in the partition of india 🇮🇳 and had played a role in the Calcutta riots of 1946 which led to the partition.

[@platinumofthesouth9557]

@@pravahsaxena3537 so you liked the partition? Where the 1650 Bengal borders were changed by the British? The British came,they looted and left a country by dividing it on basis of religion instead of a nation state. Many Bengali people's hearts still cry out for the historical land.

[@Haq1585]

জয় বাংলা 🇧🇩 Joy Bangla ❤

[@baddudecornpop7328]

8:15 check out the dude with the zoomer haircut. A man way ahead of his time😆

[@zohayerhossain55555]

❤ from Bangladesh

[@stormshadow5283]

India should barge in through Bangladeah and strive to create a zone around Bangladesh's border region that is autonomous for the Hindu people of Bangladesh and other Hindu Bengalis that fled to different states of India during Partition. India should also impose an air, sea, road and rail blockade thus, denying any supplies to the kanglus out sufficiently enough so that they unalive themselves due to lack of food and other basic supplies before further encroaching and decolonising more areas of "Bangladesh" from them and then giving it to Bengali Hindus. Other parts of Bangladesh like the Chittagong hill tract areas should be made independent and given to the native Chakma Hindu-Buddhist peoples while the area bordering Tropura should be re-incorporated into Tripura state creating "Greater Tripura". That is how you deal with this ilk. There will be so much of empty land in B'desh that Hindu Bengalis who fled during partition to India and present B'deshi Hindus can easily reclaim their lost lands and heritage. Finally, the decolonization of Bengal will be complete.

[@zohayerhossain55555]

​@@stormshadow5283India is hanging goat head and selling dog meat.People of seven sisters know that.

[@jobedakhan]

​@@zohayerhossain55555bro this dude is just a scum, leave it.

[@smallcube-zn2mm]

@@stormshadow5283 I can bet that you were sweating violently while typing like monkey and your mind was flying in some hypothetical hendovta fascist state type dream

[@ratulrahman7494]

As a Bangladeshi whos grandfather literally fought for before the partition of BI at the direct action day, kolkata, 1971 was mostly a lie. Its true what Pakistanis (especially punjabis) did extreme racism and economically deprived us, around three lakh people died, but what sheikh mujib did after 71 far exceeded everything. 5 lacs of biharis were killed, their women were raped, their property confiscated, and mujib legalazied this with abandoned property act. Rampant corruption caused famine which led to the extermination of mujib in 75. The truth is that after 71 we became the colony of india befor that of punjabis and now of usa. Lets see what happens in the future.

[@SafavidAfsharid3197]

Are you east Pakistani?

[@parjanyashukla176]

​@@SafavidAfsharid3197 They are Hindus 😂😂

[@abdullahassaffah]

Majority rape were down by Pakistan bangladesh also did the crime but minority faults were on both sides but Pakistan government were overall the main bad here

[@orkuokhan6171]

Biharis merited it. It's their fate. They supported P-a-k-i-s-t-a-n.

[@orkuokhan6171]

​@@SafavidAfsharid3197Bangladesh, not t-e-r-r-o-r-i-s-t-a-n.

[@mrt9555]

Not even 30% of the video is about india yet you titled the entire video after them, completely ignoring the entire 9 months of sacrifices made by the Bengali nation during the war and the 24 years of political movements prior to that.

[@Broplan]

Here i can see hindus from india supporting this war meanwhile they are massacring muslims in india😂😂

[@jaytaylor629]

John Malkovich

[@abhinavpatil759]

It's very strange to make a video about this while barely mentioning the mass murders, ethnic cleansing/genocide, and other war crimes committed by the Pakistani armed forces and their collaborators against the Bengalis.

[@mrt9555]

The video isnt even 30% about India, so I'd suggest changing the title to "How Bangladesh got Independence from Pakistan". And a few points: 1 - Most razakars were Biharis, not Bengalis. 2 - Mukti bahini didn't lack leadership, they were led by Bengali army officers (Osmani, Khaled Mosharrof, Ziaur Rahman, etc). They lacked training, not leadership. 3 - You didnt mention that in the 1965 war the East Bengal Regiment was awarded the most gallantry awards but West Pakistani newspapers barely publicised or recognised this. 4 - India never won a war against Pakistan before this one which was with the support of Bengalis and they still cant take all of Kashmir from Pakistan.

[@pravahsaxena3537]

Your 4th point os not correct. India 🇮🇳 had prevented Pakistan 🇵🇰 from capturing all of kashmir in 1947 and 1965.

[@mrt9555]

​@@pravahsaxena3537All of the kashmir wars ended inconclusively with a ceasefire and no surrender from either side, even though india is 4 times larger than pakistan and has a 6 times higher population.

[@magma9000]

🇵🇰♥️🇧🇩

[@orkuokhan6171]

No, forget about it. Don't need this.

[@JacobNoir]

​@@orkuokhan6171Yeah 🇵🇰🫸🇧🇩

[@JacobNoir]

​@@orkuokhan6171Since ur so happy about that

[@nyannero3262]

Please cover the 1974 famine in Bangladesh as well. A dark part of our history

[@MessiForever-q9l]

🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿 🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿 *Popcorn for everyone who is here to see the drama in the comments section*

[@unknownkingdom]

Pakistan has never won a military battle in ita entire history

[@kaiserwhence2468]

Even tho sheikh mujib became popular during and before war After liberation,his policies became more and more autocratic and he was going for total communism ,which would have been disastrous,imagine a new norty korea/china there He lost most of his popularity near 1975 due to his policies ,even today we mostly know him as another dictator Kinda like Stalin,who was hailed as a hero during ww2 but was a tyrant non the less

[@abdullahassaffah]

The stalin communism is false in fact munibur Rahman declared once he gets the country under control by the next 5 years he wants to have the first election in the country so he wasn't going for communism even ziaur Rahman the next president continued with many of his policy despite being against his with various matters. The main criticism is his secular ideology where he refused to declare a 90% muslim country as a Islamic country because of his secular ideology to support kafir where he undoubtedly lost muslim support and rightly so the liberation was dine by a army of 90% muslim and a minor 10% in fact less but somehow they were a major cause of liberation when they were not so his secular ideology was a mess

[@kaiserwhence2468]

@@abdullahassaffah what does election has anything to do with communism? Communism is an economic term Not to mention that election would only have "One party" and just before assassination mujib was about to make that one party decree,"bakshal" party Like Chinese one party election with only one option I wouldn't call that an actual election

[@kaiserwhence2468]

@@abdullahassaffah the main problem was he going for bakshal But yes I agree ,he was going for extreme secularism like china or USSR Which caused his assassination

[@ivannaharmoni]

​@@abdullahassaffahDude Mujib was aiming for North Korea type government. That is what happened

[@HikmaHistory]

Yh that's one thing I found fascinating in my research - unfortunately it was outside the remit of this video.

[@lordvenom4419]

Inshaallah, wallai, Soon again Bangladeshi will pay the tax to Pakistan again, Alhamdulillah..!

[@crazychicken8290]

mmm

[@uncensoredwiz162]

Interesting facts: from 1947 to 1971, Karachi,lahore and specially Islamabad was developed and built only by the east Pakistan's money! All the development for West Pakistan were developed by East Pakistan's money. All the major export used to go from east side but the money used to go to west side. Whole Pakistan's 80% was reserved for west side and 20% for east side. During 1965, bengal regiment saved Lahore and a officer from bengal regiment known as Ziaur rahman ( he was the most finest and successful of Bangladesh), was in the kehm karan front and infiltrated almost 10-15 km inside indian punjab and stayed there for the rest of the war and no west Pakistan soldier dared to enter india during that war.... Basically Pakistan treated east side as their colony and wanted to impose their own culture on Bengali people. But wish Pakistan bright future ❤

[@wazukyan7696]

the language is not bengali but Bangali . bengali is what the british called it

[@kshitijbhamre8179]

Moral of the story - Never mess with hindus and never underestimate hindus. They can brought you especially prophetic believers on their knees. Second thing is that 1965 war was not stalemate. It was won by India under leadership of great Lal Bahadur Shastri. Indian troops reached upto the Lahore and Indian tri colour flag hoisted in lahore. After Tashkent accord India came to there real position.

[@orkuokhan6171]

Never mess with Hindus but the Britishs and the real Muslims submitted the hindus but the Muslim were cooler and treat them as equal. Never mess with true muslims.

[@JacobNoir]

1965 war was a decisive Pakistani victory- The telegraph The Australian says that Pakistan won too. Pakistan gained more land than India. U Hindus were begging on ur knees against Pakistanis to the point ur govt cried to the UN and then had to put a ceasefire

[@kshitijbhamre8179]

@@JacobNoir what a joke 🤣. Australia, USA and UK were allies of Pakistan. It was cold war politics. That's why they stated this fake news. Even many Pakistani intellectuals like Najam Sethi accepted and told the fact that pakistan lost 1965 battle comprehensively. It is for the moral of pakistani people books and other things showcase it as a victory 🤣🤣🤣🤣. What a pathetic country man. Never mess with hindus bro 🤣. Even if you aren't believing then watch Pakistani historians KZbin videos on this. It will give clear idea to you. How hindus kicked off pakistanis in 47, 65 and 99.

[@kshitijbhamre8179]

@@orkuokhan6171 It doesn't matter good Muslim or bad Muslim. Because it's a fact that whenever Muslims faced hindus in one to one battle (without any treachery ) Muslim got defeated always. Even in today's era hindus are way superior than muslims. Also Islam always lost in ideological battles. But unfortunately brothers and sisters from pakistan whose ancestors were hindus are not accepting this ultimate truth.

[@kshitijbhamre8179]

​@@JacobNoir What a joke 🤣. See US, UK and Australia were alies of Pakistan because of cold war tactics. They were funding pak army as well. Because of this they stated such fake news that Pakistan won n all 🤣. But in reality pak lost the battle with humiliation. Even many Pakistani military officials and intellectuals accepted this fact. Pakistani intellectuals like Najam Sethi accepted that India beat Pakistan comprehensively in battle. You can also check out pakistani KZbin history channels for this. That's why it's stated fact that in 1965 Pakistan get kicked off by Hindus.

[@Nom_AnorVSJedi]

India helped Bangladesh 🇧🇩 gain independence. So why are Bangladeshis so anti-India? Why the ingratitude??

[@memesforcomrade7666]

Simple reason we love our freedom and want to remain independent. Indian policy makers want to undermine Bangladeshi independence so that's why we are anti-India

[@wannaknowwho25]

USA also helped France to gain its independence from Nazi German but they or their leaders didn't sell their nation or overly fantasize about USA. now think about for a bit you might get your answer.

[@Ariyan_1709]

Because you guys try to interfere with our internal politics too much. For the last 16 years we gave you everything and you guys flood us on rainy days and don't give us water in summer. Even most Nepali people hate Indians. You guys are very bad neighbors.

[@jithinpoliyedathmohanan7237]

Because we tied ourselves and our national interests to a very unpopular leader who was dictatorial and ruthless to opposition, who oppressed her population so much that they start to hate her deeply and by extension India.. yeah we should learn state craft better, hope our policy makers and advisors learn

[@FermentedOuroboros]

Many Indians believe that Bangladesh is there's to do what they please with.

[@AHKhan-po4fc]

India didn't help Bangladesh out of generosity or with intention of well being of people of Bangladesh। Everything they did was for their own interest। So Bangladesh has no obligation to stay silent on India's injustices towards people of Bangladesh today।

[@KrishnkantSingh-qk8tk]

No country does any act out of generosity. India did the same and wasn't wrong in any way

[@AHKhan-po4fc]

@@KrishnkantSingh-qk8tk Then asking for anything more than gratitude from Bangladesh is unwarranted

[@nurulhudavijapurwala4936]

In geopolitics there's no friends and there's no enemy. Everything for the personal intrest.

[@theawesomeman9821]

I went to college with a Bangladeshi girl and she was no fan of India. Despite the fact that India helped her country become independent, she was never grateful for it. She pointed out that India didn't help Bangladeshis out of altruism but because it planned to conquer parts of Bangladesh which was only prevented by the Soviets and Americans telling India not to. The fact that plenty of Indian politicians and pundits openly talk about wanting to incorporate Bangladeshi lands into India, I cant blame her for having a negative view on India.

[@milfbangerbhabhilover9771]

She is high on facebo propoganda

[@shashwat7089]

Trust me, India didn't give a single shit about something as insignificant as Bangladesh. Also, what a real way of showing hate towards india, where in 20-50 million of that country's illegal immigrants have come here in the last 3 decades. India never laid a hand on Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Maldives etc, why would they ever on such a waste pit? If they wanted it, they would've taken it in way earlier, and there was no pressure of the soviets. Soviets actually helped India in the 1971 war. Really, no one cared about Bangladesh after 1971, their people are just morons.

[@shbhmmn]

She was islamist, many islamist in Bangladesh hate India because of Hindu

[@shbhmmn]

@@tafheemyeasir1606 brainwashed kanglu can't get beyond his muh India interfering in BD narrative. You do know how bangladesh Hindus went from 30% to 8% in just 70 years. Not to mention Non-AL government supporting insurgents of NE in 90s ( right after independence like Namak haram and supporting those who massacre Bengali Muslim in Assam lol)

[@gurunaathsivakumar534]

India is a secular nation

[@timberplankwkood-mi5km]

This is why nationalism is the bane of muslim ummah. Both the Bangladeshi and Pakistani muslims wanted a state of their own however after the establishment of the state, nationalism soon tookover. The pakistani nationalism made peope arrogant which caused oppression toward bengalis and as a byproduct of pakistani nationalism the bengali nationalism was born..what did we achieve? Nothing except more divide.

[@Jcaeser187]

I don't know which of the 3 is dirtier

[@lordvenom4419]

Among three india, Bangladesh and Indonesia, India is dirtiest

[@awkwardness378]

I can help 1- Your name 2 Your comment 3- The dirtiest Your mouth. No need to thank me ,ur welcome byeeee😚😚😚😉😉

[@SuperAltamish23]

Any Pakistani who has read the true history of the 1971 War knows that the Bengali people loved Pakistan and they wanted nothing more than equal treatment and respect. Most of the founding fathers who created Pakistan were from the Bengal region. Even Mujib had love for Pakistan and supported Fatima Jinnah till the end. May Allah bless the Bangladeshi people.

[@munimahmed7877]

May you the people shut up? Wether the Bengalis (including the leaders) loved to be exploited or not - that we Bengalis do not know of; have seen several evidences against it, but one must note: history is not black and white and it is written by the victors. And the truth of the matter is, the west found out about 400 years ago that the mixing of the church & state is a terrible idea and history has reaffirmed it time and time again. Too bad that the Islamic world is yet to realise it. Biggots.

[@saadsalman6641]

In 1948 Urdu was not made official language. First constitution was implemented in 1956 and Bengali was made official language along with Urdu. Even it was Khwaja Nazim uddin (from East Bengal) who had proposed Urdu to be National language, seconded by Muhammad Ali Jinnah. Language riots in 1952 were happened in East Pakistan. They had clashes with their police. Even Governor General was Bengali speaking. There was no involvement of West Pakistan in that incidence.

[@lotcam4046]

If you(Pakistanis) are not responsible then you shouldn't be in the govt, as if you can't take the failure of your management then you are not in the management, Fleeing from responsibility in govt is of those who do not want to govern,

[@JacobNoir]

​@@lotcam4046We have no power against our government, doofus. Dig deeper about Pakistan then u will actually get something through ur hallow skull

[@absaly]

bangladesh was liberated from india and Not pakistan

[@smallcube-zn2mm]

Bangladesh was never even part of bndia , it was formally part of British raj then Pak then became independent

[@sahilthakur7336]

Jihaaaaadiiii spotted 😂😂😂

[@nurulhudavijapurwala4936]

When you read history from Qur'an 😂

[@kc4276]

Lol wut?!

[@HashiramaSenyu]

Punjabis were racist, but their racism is quite less now than it used to be. Mainly because of the breaking away of bangladesh. Many people think that bangladesh broke away for good. It was just that the manner in which this happened is wrong. Pakistan should have given bangladesh autonomy the movement mujib gained a majority. Regarding the language issue, the bengali language should have been arabized and it's script changed from sanskrit to Arabic and then made a national language apart from urdu. This would have strengthned the bond between the 2 nations even if bangladesh would have lived Separately. The problem is that leaders in pakistan were high on the opium of secularism and western values esp that idi0t ayub khan and Yahya being the pro max version of ayub. 1971 made pakistan realize that in order to keep the nation together it was necessary to use Islam as the glue to bind the nation together. Hense a new constitution was drafted with Islam as the state religion.

[@dreamerachiever576]

Bengali cannot and should not be arabized, it's origins lies in Sanskrit and is a form of prakrit, is a sister language of maithili I believe that is in its own way unique and should be kept as such, arabization would mean distortion of the language and also that it would cause further resentment amongst people. As it has also led the ethnic languages and infact scripts to fade away Besides the structure of Bengali language is radically different and therefore arabization without significant changes to Bengali language is nearly impossible As Arabic is Semitic language and Bengali indo Aryan Which would further make things weirder and uncanny in the longer run Another pertinent difference in my observation would be that arabization of so many different countries in Africa and middle East has led to native languages on the brink of extinction

[@HashiramaSenyu]

@@dreamerachiever576 I wonder that. You should visit central asia. Before their accession to the russian empire they all had arabic script in their languages like the Tajik, Kazakh, Uzbek etc... but the Russians changed their script to Cyrillic and it made the civilizational relations between these two spheres to form. Rn those countries can't decouple from the Russians. Infact they are happily and prospersusly living with this system.

[@dreamerachiever576]

​​ I believe invasion is one reason for this influence in central Asia But also Bengal too was invaded So let's rule out this possibility Bengali is first radically different from its much compatible indic languages such as Hindi. The lack of retroflex sounds make it more unique as retroflex sounds exist in Hindi and sanskrit but not in Bengali And I think to prove its incompatibility it's not there in Arabic either way Bengali is not even compatible to devanagiri script, let alone arabic script

[@dreamerachiever576]

​@@HashiramaSenyu also for turkic languages being compatible with Arabic script You might have noticed that turkic languages have pharyngealized sounds or guttural sounds, quite similar to Arabic that's in my observation is one of the reason why it's arabization was much more easier and people never found it repulsive

[@physicscal2142]

Why do you prefer culture and language of Arabia which is not even your birth land, and hate your birth land culture of bangali.

[@abdullahassaffah]

Problem is people go to extremes with mujibur rahman either making him bad or good he had his positives and negatives like all democratic leaders

[@riyadougla539]

Absolutely true

[@Gazaslayer1]

19:19 Pakistanis in 1971 we won the war . Pakistanis in 2000 we didn't surrender we gave Bangladeshis independence willingly Pakistanis in 2024 the surrender was not 93k but 34k saaar 😂

[@orkuokhan6171]

Pakistan clearly lose to Bangladesh. The contrary would mean to destruction of the whole region and no more Bangla culture.

[@JacobNoir]

​@@orkuokhan6171Yeah, the mukti bahini and India had outnumbered east pakistani forces. They even surrounded them and that's how Pakistan lost east pakistan

[@MidniteProphet]

This video is completely wrong because now they are literally destroying sheikh Mujib statues and are closer to Pakistan then India both countries are Muslim at the end of the day and Hindu-Muslim tensions have only been getting worse

[@orkuokhan6171]

Sadly yes, Bangladesh is no more what it was during it prime.

[@gurichoudhury1668]

This is a great video.