How Physicists Proved The Universe Isn't Locally Real

[@thomascorbett2936]

It doesnt matter if its real or not, we are stuck here .

[@jamiemccartney3242]

😂 enjoy it

[@jamiemccartney3242]

We are real! Even if the deepest of probabilities was true and we are in a simulation, we are still real. Have a nice day and don’t let our temporary knowledge have an affect on your existence ❤

[@scottmatthews1039]

Stopped one minute in, at ‘nuculer’…

[@MaxPower-vg4vr]

Let's now explore how we can apply logic, math, and physics to formalize the relationship between locality and nonlocality in physics within the monadological framework. First, let's define our basic entities and relations: - Let M be the set of all monads (fundamental psychophysical entities). - Let S be a set of "states" or "properties." - Let L be a function from M to S, where L(m) represents the "local state" or "intrinsic properties" of monad m. - Let E be a relation on M × M, where (m1, m2) ∈ E means monads m1 and m2 are "entangled" or "correlated." - Let G be a function from P(M) to S, where G(S) represents the "global state" or "systemic properties" of the set of monads S. Now, let's formalize the idea of locality and nonlocality in physics: - Locality: ∀S ⊆ M, G(S) is fully determined by {L(m) : m ∈ S}. - Nonlocality: ∃S ⊆ M, such that G(S) is not fully determined by {L(m) : m ∈ S}. In other words, locality means that the global state of a system is fully determined by the local states of its constituent monads, while nonlocality means that there are some systems whose global states are not fully determined by the local states of their constituents. We can formalize this further using the mathematical framework of tensor products and entanglement entropy: - Let H be a Hilbert space, where the elements represent the possible states of a quantum system. - Let ⊗ be the tensor product operation, where H1 ⊗ H2 represents the state space of a composite system made up of subsystems with state spaces H1 and H2. - The locality and nonlocality of physics can be expressed as: - Locality: ∀S ⊆ M, ∃{Hi : i ∈ I} such that G(S) ∈ ⊗{Hi : i ∈ I}, where each Hi corresponds to the state space of a monad in S. - Nonlocality: ∃S ⊆ M, such that ∀{Hi : i ∈ I}, G(S) ∉ ⊗{Hi : i ∈ I}, where each Hi corresponds to the state space of a monad in S. Here, locality is formalized as the principle that the global state of a system can always be decomposed into a tensor product of local states, while nonlocality is formalized as the existence of systems whose global states cannot be decomposed into a tensor product of local states (i.e., they exhibit entanglement). Finally, we can connect this to physics by noting that this formalism is directly applicable to the study of quantum entanglement and Bell's theorem: - Bell's theorem shows that any physical theory that satisfies certain locality and realism assumptions will make predictions that are contradicted by quantum mechanics. - Experiments testing Bell's inequalities have consistently shown that quantum mechanics is correct and that the locality assumptions must be abandoned. The monadological framework accommodates these results by allowing for the existence of nonlocal correlations between monads, which can give rise to the entanglement phenomena observed in quantum systems. In summary, by using tools from logic, math (tensor products and entanglement entropy), and physics (quantum mechanics and Bell's theorem), we can formalize the both/and nature of locality and nonlocality in physics within the monadological framework: - Physical systems can exhibit both local and nonlocal properties, depending on the nature of the correlations between their constituent monads. - Some systems may have global states that are fully determined by the local states of their parts (locality), while others may have global states that are irreducible to the local states of their parts (nonlocality). - This formalism is directly applicable to the study of quantum entanglement and the empirical validation of nonlocality in quantum mechanics. This analysis demonstrates the power of the monadological framework to provide a unified and coherent foundation for understanding the subtle and often counterintuitive nature of reality as revealed by modern physics. By embracing a both/and approach and drawing on the tools of logic, mathematics, and physics, we can develop a more comprehensive and accurate picture of the fundamental principles governing the universe at its deepest levels.

[@kevinbissinger]

Yikes these comments are unhinged

[@Anderson_Se7en]

“Real” “space-time” and other terms have such specific meanings apart from general use that you’d almost have to have a lecture on the term “locally real” before most could conceive of the idea. Physicists seem to be the worst of all disciplines at making their concepts accessible to the general public. Or maybe it’s media types who go off only on the most far fetched possibilities for the sake of attention.

[@NondescriptMammal]

Totally agree. Space isn't real! TIme isn't real! The universe isn't real! The universe is a hologram! The universe is a simulation! There is an infinitude of multiple universes! There are ten dimensions! Or maybe eleven! Physics used to be a hard science, now it's more like science fiction for lunatics.

[@fr57ujf]

No discussion of non-locality.

[@curtistolman5830]

This proves the physicists aren't real, they are mathematicians.

[@livehabesha4642]

Lol

[@เทอดชนถนอมวงศ์-ม5ฏ]

Universe is going to change all times.

[@mrhassell]

When observe Mars through a telescope, we’re seeing Mars as it appeared 9 minutes and 18 seconds ago. We’re essentially observing a delayed version of Mars-a snapshot from the past. The average distance between Earth and Mars is approximately 225 million kilometers (about 140 million miles). Since light travels at a finite speed (approximately 299,792 kilometers per second or 186,282 miles per second), it takes some time for the light emitted by Mars to reach us.

[@mrhassell]

I hope someday the "Fluxliner" UFO story, turns out to be real. I could put up with a submarine hatch and sit inside a tin can, for the chance to have a look at Mars in person. Although I don't think I'd be stepping outside of it, with radiation everywhere and -60c weather.. It's an atmosphere, but not one I'd want to spend any time in.

[@MadCorfiotTolis]

Your point?

[@mrhassell]

@@MadCorfiotTolis Herman Minkowski, introduced his concept of Minkowski spacetime, combining three dimensions of space with one dimension of time. Four-dimensional continuum, taking a geometric approach to spacetime, developing "Geometry of Numbers", a branch of math, dealing with properties of an integers point in geometric space. This field has applications, beyond number theory, it's useful in statistics, business intelligence, programming, databases, and optimization as well as solving irreducible complexity issues, and even wouldn't you know it, in reverse engineering. Minkowski's geometric framework, provides an introduction to the Special Theory of Relativity, realised in a similar era, 1905. No technology was required, or needed. Deeply connected to Einstein's early work, is Mileva Marić (first wife), equally going beyond simple or a coincidence, they were students in the same class, same college, Zürich Polytechnic (ETH Zurich), the only female student, studying in the same class as a promising young man, named Albert Einstein. They had a daughter, unfortunately its said she "Lieserl" died early as a child, in 1902, seccumb by scarlet fever. Another story, tells that Mileva's best friend, took her and raised her as her own. They were also gifted two sons, Hans Albert and Eduard. The Annus Mirabilis Papers, with Special Relativity are not conclusively or definitely, a collective work of Einstein and Marić. It's frustrating, hearing the only reason Einstein handed Mileva the prize money of his first Nobel prize, was to nurture and for raising of their children. In reality, it's my opinion he did that, more as an act of fairness, as much as for his two boys. Mileva as a female was unable to receive formal recognition or have her name attributed to their joint undertaken work. I don't buy it. I think it may have played a role in their divorce and left her with a sense of bitterness, to Einstein. To some it is undoubtable, she committed herself completely to working on Special Relativity, possibly more so than Einstein (he was committed to the work 110%), so much her grades suffered and even failed examination on theory of functions, twice! When you commit to something as revolutionary as the Special Theory of Relativity, paving the way, for the groundbreaking concept of General Theory of Relativity, which also undoubtedly wouldn't have ever been started, let alone completed, without her initial input or assistance of his friend Marcel Grossmann, a mathematician not mentioned in the final theory, yet there's this; The first comprehensive version of the General Theory of Relativity, “Über die spezielle und die allgemeine Relativitätstheorie”, published by Albert Einstein, 1916. Only possible, thanks to Mileva Marić, developing the conceptual background in Special Relativity, and his friend Marcel Grossmannn, sharing insight to a unique non-Euclidean geometry - Riemannian geometry, enabling Einstein to develop the theory of General Relativity. Providing a fundamental mathematical framework independent of full realisation at the time, required to support the unique physical suppositions of gravity, the central idea, first delivered and mostly obscured, hardly even known, the genius Marcel Grossmann who mutually published in 1913, the Grossmann & Einstein paper, “Entwurf einer verallgemeinerten Relativitätstheorie und einer Theorie der Gravitation”, or "Outline of a Generalized Theory of Relativity and Theory of Gravitation”. Nobody remembers who placed 2nd or 3rd in a race, but when you look, of course every winner comes with others, hot on their heels, never made it to their height, for many good and sometimes, simply varied reasons. The same is true of academia, some go onto be seen by the world as groundbreakers, changing the World and sometimes by ways never dreamed, in others highlight deeper fundamental truths> I always find the truth, resonates in people, in ways, impossible to describe, deeply integrated in varied aspects of reality, you feel it and know it, pulling strings, finding feelings somewhere deep from within, almost like crying out to be freed, waiting for a moment, recognition. Recognition, can help to build a better understanding the world, by a route of understanding, found in the lives of the people who helped it grown and who have changed it. Their perspective, brings all the elements to focus, given time. Allowing one to absorb many deeper aspects, often missed which are somehow important, how they came to being, or random events became involved. Break into the hallowed halls of knowledge, find the back doors or those less direct, perhaps only because they're a bit less intimidating or even more revealing and telling. It deepens the deepest understanding, for the sharpest mind and I recommend it... so... enjoy half a book!

[@mrhassell]

@@MadCorfiotTolismaybe a better question, which point would you like? I've plenty, none are really points as such, simply observations. Does everything need a point, I mean if you're plotting points, looking deeper into Minkowski space, will reveal a few and even new ways to do different things with them..

[@mrhassell]

The ""point" of the above comment, is simple. The title of the video "The Universe Isn't Locally Real", that... is why, in its most basic sense.

[@kakhaval]

When I see your video it took some time to reach me as well. The problem of designing with zero time is hard, try it

[@RomoRooster]

All points in space and time are connected, light travels instantly through space. Everything is relative, except during marriage when you should avoid relatives.

[@jimharper229]

I couldn't finish watching this. The sibilance is drilling into my brain. The audio is in dire need of de-essing.

[@mekhailhasan]

How can I get in touch with you?

[@kakhaval]

The brain has to have a modelling approach to translate reality. You don't expect to design it any different. You don't need to see your garden at photon level.

[@MrClarencdw]

Ya missed one "nuke-you-ler" in the edit

[@jballenger9240]

25:45 🪐🪐Nudging “…a sew-saw….” 🤨🪐🙃??? Maybe they meant a slide🪐🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️

[@susanwangari3753]

I thought the earth resembles a plate to put food onto and the moon is like a cup or vessel to put the drinks into.🤔 All the universal patterns are not only in nature show but our mother and grandmother watch them when knitting or crocheting, study their patterns and the calculation.

[@mrhassell]

Cheers to that. Pink Floyd wrote an album along the lines you describe. "A saucer full of secrets", wasn't their best but was very interesting and you can see what was evolving, when you listen to it now.. if you can stand it that is. They did many better works but none after, came with such abstract thinking or ideas, that is inspired and although they created many brilliant albums and songs, nothing like that came ever again.

[@JungleJargon]

The universe is a real fabrication, however temporary.

[@JusticeLeGrand10101]

Time is present in every dimension. Time is the energy that makes dimensions possible.

[@IamNothing82]

Time is an illusion.

[@dhfaydan]

Let me think about that 😂😂😂😂

[@santyclause8034]

Physics isn't Philosphy, end of debate.

[@emermbiemeri]

kini kujdes

[@Nnamdi-wi2nu]

The front line of physics and science NOT "physicists prove that the universe isn't locally real." It's a good video not withstanding the slip of tongue.

[@scottmcdonald5237]

😅

[@jackmorrison8269]

Glad all these physicists are actually getting something done for the average human, besides make smaller cell phones.

[@derrickcox7761]

Your brain isnt real.

[@mrhassell]

Nothing is real. Perhaps Its all exactly as they say in the field of AI, an "hallucination".

[@JusticeLeGrand10101]

Time is the fabric of the universe. Gravity does not weave without time. Time is the energy that gives gravity. The energy needed to weave. 22:15

[@JusticeLeGrand10101]

The plan for the universe is formed through time. 33:18

[@JusticeLeGrand10101]

Gibberish! 47:01

[@JusticeLeGrand10101]

Jupiter and its moons? How about Jupiter and its satellites. Only planet earth has a satellite named moon. Read more nonfiction. Dictionary. Encyclopedia. Put down the pseudoscience and study astronomy. Study linguistics. upgrade your vocabulary. perfect your dialect. for example, we are our star! 18:34